Cabais, Jefren Paul A.

04/08/2025
Finals_Lab_Act#1
Sub:CSE_2
BSCS-2B

Applications of Matrix Chain Multiplication

I. Introduction

Matrices are basic mathematical and computer science concepts. As arrays of numbers displayed in

rows and columns, matrices are useful aids for representing sophisticated systems and carrying out

large-scale numerical computations. Their operations and properties—addition, multiplication,

transposition, and inversion—enable manipulation of data across multidimensional space. Since

matrices are often employed to describe and solve systems of equations, they are used in many fields

like physics, engineering, computer graphics, and machine learning.

One of the most frequent and computationally important operations on matrices is matrix

multiplication. If several matrices are multiplied, the number of scalar multiplications needed

depends greatly on the way the matrices are parenthesized for multiplication. While matrix

multiplication is associative, i.e., the result is independent of parenthesization, the number of

operations can be quite different depending on how the product is calculated.

This optimization problem leads to the Matrix Chain Multiplication (MCM) problem, a traditional

dynamic programming problem in algorithm design. It finds the optimal method of multiplying a

chain of matrices by finding the best sequence of operations. The aim of this paper is to discuss the

conceptual basis of MCM and examine its wide variety of applications in various fields, illustrating

its continued relevance in both theoretical and applied contexts.

Matrix Chain Multiplication is concerned with finding the minimum number of scalar multiplications

required to compute the product of a chain of matrices. Let there be nnn matrices A1,A2,...,AnA_1,

A_2,..., A_nA1,A2,...,An, where the dimensions of matrix AiA_iAi are pi−1×pip_{i-1} \times

pipi−1×pi. What is not aimed for is doing the multiplications but determining the optimal way of

parenthesizing the product in order to have the minimum number of scalar multiplications.

Because matrix multiplication is associative, the expression A1A2A3A_1A_2A_3A1 A2 A3 can be

grouped as (A1 A2)A3(A_1A_2)A_3(A1 A2 )A3 or A1(A2A3)A_1(A_2A_3)A1(A2 A3) each

resulting in different computational costs. For example, to multiply a 10×10010 \\times 10010×100

matrix by a 100×5100 \\times 5100×5 matrix takes 5,000 multiplications, while to multiply a

100×5100 \\times 5100×5 matrix by a 5×505 \\times 505×50 matrix takes only 25,000 operations. If

the chain consists of more than three matrices, the number of possible parenthesizations increases

exponentially.

Dynamic programming provides a more efficient solution to this problem. Dynamic programming

breaks down the core problem into overlapping subproblems, solves every subproblem once, and

remembers the outcomes so that the outcomes can be reused. The standard algorithm builds a table to

track the minimum number of operations involved in calculating each sub-chain of matrices. This

approach ensures that the computation is performed in polynomial time, namely O(n3)O(n^3)O(n3),

and has a space complexity of O(n2)O(n^2)O(n2).

Though founded on theoretical grounds at the start, Matrix Chain Multiplication is now used far and

wide across different fields requiring matrix operations as components of more elaborate, advanced

systems.

III. Applications of Matrix Chain Multiplication

In computer graphics, objects are typically manipulated through a sequence of geometric

transformations—i.e., scaling, rotation, and translation. These transformations are generally

represented in the form of matrices and applied to objects by multiplying them with the coordinate

matrices of the object.

Instead of applying each transformation individually to the object, graphics engines combine all the

transformation matrices into one composite matrix. In situations where many transformation matrices

are necessary, determining the best order to multiply matrices to minimize computation and enhance

rendering efficiency is crucial. The MCM algorithm allows for rendering engines to optimize latency

reduction by calculating such composite transformations efficiently. This is especially important in

real-time scenarios like video games, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR), where frame

rates need to be kept high so that user experience is smooth.

B. Scientific Computing and Engineering Simulations

Scientific computing typically consists of the simulation of physical systems with mathematical

models expressed in the matrix format. Some examples are simulating electrical circuits, fluid

dynamics, mechanical stress patterns, and chemical reactions. The simulations need to solve very

large systems of linear equations or evaluate matrix expressions involving scores or hundreds of

matrices.

For example, in finite element techniques (FEM) applied in engineering analysis, different element

matrices are assembled and multiplied to create global system matrices. Fast multiplication of the

matrices can greatly affect the performance of the simulation, particularly when working with large-

scale systems that have millions of degrees of freedom. MCM offers a way of optimizing such

matrix expressions and thus decreasing overall computation time without changing the physical

fidelity of the model.

C. Database Query Optimization

optimization in relational databases. For query processing, join operations of tables may also be

viewed on similar lines to matrix multiplication. Each operation by join processes the rows from two

tables and might be weighted by a computation cost.

Database management systems (DBMS) employ query optimizers to decide how to best execute a

query, and frequently this is done by rearranging join operations to reduce computational expense.

Through algorithms like MCM, optimizers try different orders of joins and choose the one that

minimizes the query's cost overall. This is particularly helpful in data warehousing and big data

analytics involving large databases, where queries may be joining many large tables and performance

optimization is critical.

D. Compiler Design and Code Optimization

Optimization of arithmetic expressions is a very important aspect of code generation in compiler

construction. Matrix Chain Multiplication is immediately relevant in optimizing matrix arithmetic

expressions, particularly in scientific programming languages with matrix operations as first-class

citizens.

For instance, in Fortran or C++-based high-performance computing (HPC) programs, matrix

operations can be translated into series of lower-level commands. MCM-like algorithms are used by

the compiler to determine the most efficient sequence of evaluation. This optimizes memory access

and CPU cycles and finally produces executable code faster.

E. Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks

Matrix operations form the core of machine learning and deep learning, and in both, forward and

backward propagation steps consist of a series of matrix multiplications. For example, in deep neural

networks (DNNs), every layer consists of matrix multiplications between the input features and the

weight matrix of the layer.

optimized back-end linear algebra libraries (e.g., BLAS, cuBLAS), the computation underlying can

still be improved using MCM principles, especially when there are a series of linear transformations

composed together. Reordering these operations can save computational overhead, especially in

proprietary or light-weight inference engines employed in edge devices.

In addition, in training big models like transformer architectures or CNNs, the training time is

usually several days or even weeks. Any increase in efficiency of matrix computations directly

corresponds to huge cost and energy reductions.

F. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Matrix operations are also common in bioinformatics for problems involving sequence alignment,

building phylogenetic trees, and the analysis of gene expression, among others. Such problems

typically involve the computation and comparison of large similarity or distance matrices.

Matrix Chain Multiplication can be used to make dynamic programming algorithm computations

more efficient, like in the Needleman–Wunsch and Smith–Waterman algorithms for sequence

alignment. These algorithms build scoring matrices whose computation can be made more efficient

by using MCM techniques. Moreover, in systems biology, biochemical reaction networks are

represented with matrix algebra, and efficient matrix multiplication is then needed for simulation and

analysis.

G. Robotics and Control Systems

In robotics, coordinate frame transformations play an important role in calculating the position and

orientation of robot parts. They are modeled by homogeneous transformation matrices that are

chained up and multiplied together to calculate the end effector's final pose relative to the base

frame.

When robotic arms possess numerous joints, the number of transformations is high, and minimizing

the multiplication order using MCM becomes useful in lowering the computation time of motion
planning algorithms. This is vital in real-time systems where reaction time is paramount for safety

and accuracy.

Example:

Given four matrices with dimensions:

 A1=10×30 =10×30
 A2=30×5 = 30×5
 A3=5×60 = 5×60
 A4=60×10 =60×10

We want to find the optimal way to multiply them. Naively computing all combinations would
involve trying different parenthesizations:

 ((A1A2)A3)A4
 (A1(A2A3))A4
 (A1A2)(A3A4)

By using the dynamic programming approach to matrix chain multiplication, we find that the
minimal cost is achieved using the parenthesization:

((A1A2)(A3A4))

This reduces the total scalar multiplications required from potentially over 30,000 to around 4,500.

IV. Limitations and Challenges

As extensive as its usage is, though, Matrix Chain Multiplication also has its draw backs. Primarily,

while the dynamic programming method of breaking the MCM problem down exists in

O(n3)O(n^3)O(n3) and is therefore less than ideal in cases of matrices that form a very long chain,
more complicated methods like using sparse matrix forms or heuristic codes could provide increases

in efficiency without sacrificing exactness.

Second, the MCM problem has the implicit assumption that all the matrices used are dense and does

not in itself account for sparsity. In most practical applications, matrices can have large quantities of

zero entries. Sparse matrix algorithms implemented especially for this purpose are usually superior to

generic MCM algorithms under these circumstances.

Furthermore, the MCM algorithm requires complete knowledge of the dimensions of all matrices

involved. In dynamic or real-time systems where matrix sizes may vary based on input data, this

information may not always be available beforehand, limiting the algorithm's applicability.

Lastly, whereas MCM targets the optimization of scalar multiplications, it fails to consider other key

factors like memory access patterns, cache usage, or parallelizability of operations. In contemporary

high-performance computing settings, these are usually equally significant as the reduction of

arithmetic operations.

V. Conclusion

Matrix Chain Multiplication, though originally presented as a textbook problem in algorithm design,

has demonstrated far-reaching application in various areas dependent on matrix computation.

Ranging from enhanced performance in graphics and scientific simulation to database query

optimization and neural network computation, MCM is crucial in making matrix-intensive

applications more efficient.

The importance of MCM is its capacity to lower computational overhead while not sacrificing the

integrity of the end result. By identifying the most effective chain of matrix multiplications, it allows

systems to compute faster and more economically, especially in conditions where computational

resources are limited.

theoretical underpinnings established by MCM still affect optimization methods in research studies

as well as in commercial endeavors. With growing sizes of data and complexities in systems,

requirements for matrix operations with optimal efficiency will continue to rise, guaranteeing Matrix

Chain Multiplication a place as an aid for computational efficiency well into the future.

In an era driven by data, computation, and optimization, MCM reaffirms the strength of traditional

algorithmic thinking to address contemporary problems. It is an excellent illustration of how refined

mathematical intuition can provide significant practical payoffs in real-world systems.

References
Aho, A. V., Lam, M. S., Sethi, R., & Ullman, J. D. (2006). Compilers: Principles,
techniques, and tools (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/compilers-principles-techniques-
and-tools/P200000003702

Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L., & Stein, C. (2009). Introduction to
algorithms (3rd ed.). MIT Press.
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262033848/introduction-to-algorithms/

Golub, G. H., & Van Loan, C. F. (2013). Matrix computations (4th ed.). Johns
Hopkins University Press. https://jhupbooks.press.jhu.edu/title/matrix-computations

Knuth, D. E. (1997). The art of computer programming, Volume 1: Fundamental

Kumar, V., Grama, A., Gupta, A., & Karypis, G. (1994). Introduction to parallel
computing: Design and analysis of algorithms. Benjamin/Cummings. https://www-
users.cs.umn.edu/~karypis/parbook/

Nocedal, J., & Wright, S. J. (2006). Numerical optimization (2nd ed.). Springer.
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (2007).
Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing (3rd ed.). Cambridge University
Press. https://numerical.recipes/

Rosen, K. H. (2012). Discrete mathematics and its applications (7th ed.). McGraw-
Hill Education. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/discrete-
mathematics-its-applications-rosen/M9780073383095.html

Sedgewick, R., & Wayne, K. (2011). Algorithms (4th ed.). Addison-Wesley.