0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 22 views 2 pages A Low Hazard Laboratory Procedure For The Preparation of Polynitrate Esters
The document presents a low hazard procedure for the laboratory preparation of polynitrate esters using a nitration method with mixed nitric-sulfuric acid and dichloromethane. This method allows for high yield and purity of the product while minimizing safety risks through careful monitoring of reaction conditions with a redox probe. The authors emphasize the importance of safety precautions and provide a detailed example of the preparation of 1-Propanediol Dinitrate.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save A Low Hazard Laboratory Procedure for the Preparat... For Later 484 Communications
‘A Low Hazard Procedure for the Laboratory Prepara-
tion of Polynitrate Esters
Cruig D. Mangia, Clifrd E. Keistorttason, Mitchel M.
Rorawo, Anthony P, Maxrana, Michael W. Baas
Thiokol Corporation, Bisham City, Utah $4302, USA.
‘We would lke to report a convenient, low hazard procedure
for the laboratory preparation of nitrate esters of polyols,
This method provides product in high yield and of analytical
purity without resorting to physical methods of purification,
‘This procedure has been utilized to prepare from 24 g up.
10.450 g of nitrate ester. Our method involves the nitration
of the polyol with mixed nitric-sulfuri acid in the presence
‘of dichloromethane. The reuction conditions are monitored
by an Ingold Type 488 redox potential probe!
Dichloromethane solvent is present in these reactions pri
marily to redice the safely hazards associated with the pre-
paration and the products. This is done in three ways
(a) the solvent deercases the impact sensitivity of the nitrate
ester: (b) it removes the nitrate ester from the aitration
medium so that side reactions are minimized: and (c) it
serves a a heat sink in case of too rapid heat eneration.
NOs 1 HaS0g 1 aCla
HO=(CHg)—0H | Ee
(pN—0~(cHH2};-O-NOz
The Ingold redox probe is present in the nitrating acid
to monitor the nitrite ion formation, which could generate
unstable nitrite esters. The theoretical aspects of the wiliza
tion of these probes in the nitroglycerine manofacturing
process have been described by Ohman?, The nitrite anion
can be minimized by starting with pure polyol and can
be kept at a reduced level by using the probe to control
the addition rate of the polyol. The polyol is added to
the nitrating acd at rate which keeps the potential nearly
“Table, Nitration of Polyols
syntuesis
constant, In a typical addition, the initial probe reading
will be near —001 volt und when the addition is complete
ial should be near 0.07 volt, with a temperature
If the potential nears —0.20 volt the reaction
‘may be Out of control and at ~0.35 volt it may undergo
rapid and violent decomposition’,
‘An additional procedure required 1 reduce the nitrite anion
concentration involves the careful preparation ofthe aitrat-
ing acd solution. Ths is easily achieved by the stow addition
oesly prepared anhydrous iti acid (oan equal volume
of cooled fuming sulfuric acid while maintaining 2 constant
temperature. Te trite concentration of this nitrating acid
is determined by a permanganate titration technique’. The
initial value should be near 0.016%, as nitrous acid and
this material should no longer be used for nitration afer
the nitrous acid concentration reaches 005%
With the use of these techniques on a laboratory scale,
several polynitrate esters could be easily prepared (see Table)
with the minimum of hazard and in high yield and purity
The additional advantages of this method, as previously
‘mentioned, include desensitization ofthe product by diluting
in the solvent, maintaining stable reaction conditions with
the redox probe, and the avoidance of unstable side products
sul as nitrite esters,
CAUTION: These nitrate esters should be prepared behind
safety shields in an isolated luboraory, since the prot
tare highly explosive materials. Asa further safety precaution
or minimize transfer of hazardous materials and to mainain
temperature control, we recommend the use of a jackeel,
three-neck flask witha bottam discharge, Teflon stopeoek. All
‘asst glass joints shouldbe Teflon cape wrapped. All washings
should be done in the reaction flask. Experience with these
rections should be gained on «small scale before attempting
them on a larger scale. The following procedure is typical
Payot Yar mp tmp Reng Li Relate Mer
ras races fetta
vo-oneke-on-on tans uns Gatnioy
om
wo-cny-biedn=ct-oh By ae CottaNOn
on
©), ae
im
vo-temn-ou “ ans aaa GMO
wa
+The 18. spocra of the product nitrate eters ae identical (0 those of authentic samples.
Ref §. page 3
«All products gave satisfactory nitrogen analyses (N +0.07%): values were determined on samples as isolated by removing reaction
solvent under redo pressure
Ret. §, page 166
fr cabttienions, considerable material was discarded since she mannitol hexanirate was insoluble in the dichloromethane
© Mannitol hesuniteate was rccrystilzed from ethanol before determination of nitrogen analysis.
Ref 5, page 168July 1977 ‘Communications 485
Preparation of1-Propanedil Dinitrate:
The nitrating acid is prepared by slowly adding freshly prepared
anhydrous nitric acid (200 ml, 486 mol) (0 funing sulfuric acid
1200 mi) while siring and maintaining temperature of less
than IS", After the addition of distilled dichloromethane (1,500,
mi) the mixture iseooled to 12° andthe initial potential reading
‘ofthe Ingold Type 488 redox probe is 1006 volt The 1 3-propane-
iol (760 1.00 mol) is slowly added to the stirred nitraing
mixture at a rate which wil keep the potential as steady as
possible with temperatuc lessthan 12". Aer the (3-propanediol
‘klition i completed, the redox potential is ~204S volt at 10°.
The seat acid is immediately removed through the bottom di
charge stopcock and the dichloromethane phase i washed in
‘the reaction isk with water ($00 ml 1), 10% aqueous sodium
Ccbonate solution (400 mi» 3}, 10% ayueous urea solution (500
mlx Ih and water (500 mlx 3), Thi organie phase is driod over
anhydrous sodium sulfate followed by 4A molecular sieves. The
‘olsen i removed under reduced pressure to give the L3-propane-
iol dinitrate: yok: 1480 186")
CHaNsO, cle. N 1686
(166.1) found 1679
[LR neat an =2990, 2905, 1640, 1288 om
We gravelly acknowledge Mr. Paul Mosher and the late Mr
Witham 0. Brimyjoin ofthe Naval Oninance Station, Indian Heal
‘Marsan for their helpfi discssionsohich le 10 the wse of
the Ingold reo probes
Recived: October 25, 1976 (Revised form: January 28, 1977)
"These redox probes
Now Jersy
* V, Ohman, Sven. Kem. Tidsr. 78 20 (1966) and references
ted thercin, To our knowledge utilization of these. probes
fon a laboratory scale and with polyols other than slyeerine
and diethylene glycol has not been reported
» P. Mosherand W.O. Brimijoin, Naval Ordnance Station, Indian
Head, Maryland: personal communication.
“1M, Kolo, EB. Sandel. EJ. Meshan, . Brokenstein,
Quanciative Chemical Analysis, Ath Edit, The Macmillan Com:
Pung 1969p. 8M,
* T.Urbatshi Chemis and Technolog of Exposces, Pergamon
Press, Oxford 1968
ailable rom Chemapec, In. Hoboken,