- -

(Communicative Marathi for Nurses - Short

Course) 1st Edition Gauri Brahme install
download

https://ebookstep.com/download/ebook-35039710/

Download more ebook from https://ebookstep.com

We believe these products will be a great fit for you. Click
the link to download now, or visit ebookstep.com
to discover even more!

Be Her Defender Lizuka Myori

http://ebookstep.com/product/be-her-defender-lizuka-myori/

Giáo trình Be Internet Awesome 1st Edition Google

http://ebookstep.com/product/giao-trinh-be-internet-awesome-1st-
edition-google/

I ll Be Your Wife Jho Hyo-Eun

http://ebookstep.com/product/i-ll-be-your-wife-jho-hyo-eun/

Marry Me or Be My Wife Ally Jane

http://ebookstep.com/product/marry-me-or-be-my-wife-ally-jane/
The Way I Used to Be 1st Edition Amber Smith

http://ebookstep.com/product/the-way-i-used-to-be-1st-edition-
amber-smith/

Osez être trois Dare to be Three Dare Ménage 3 1st

Edition Jeanne St James

http://ebookstep.com/product/osez-etre-trois-dare-to-be-three-
dare-menage-3-1st-edition-jeanne-st-james/

长月无 又名 黑月光拿 BE 本 1st Edition 藤 枝

https://ebookstep.com/download/ebook-50797502/

O Menino Que Se Alimentava de Pesadelos Coleção It s

Okay To Not Be Okay Livro 1 1st Edition Ko Moon Young

http://ebookstep.com/product/o-menino-que-se-alimentava-de-
pesadelos-colecao-it-s-okay-to-not-be-okay-livro-1-1st-edition-
ko-moon-young/

如何在二十一世紀反對資本主義 How to Be an Anticapitalist in the

Twenty First Century Traditional Chinese Edition
艾瑞克.萊特

https://ebookstep.com/download/ebook-34828554/
गौरी ब्रह्मे / GAURI BRAHME
अदिती गुप्ते / ADITI GUPTE
सुहास लिमये / SUHAS LIMAYE

Communicative Marathi for Nurses

परिचारिकांसाठी मराठी
लघु-अभ्यासक्रम / SHORT COURSE

संपादक / EDITORS
मेहर
े भूत / MEHER BHOOT
विभा सुराणा / VIBHA SURANA
आन�द काटीकर / ANAND KATIKAR

संकल्पना आणि निर्मिती / CONCEPT & PRODUCTION

मुंबई विद्यापीठ राज्य मराठी विकास संस्था, मुंबई

UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI RAJYA MARATHI VIKAS SANSTHA, MUMBAI
ISBN No.: 978-93-5346-828-6

FIRST EDITION, 2019

पहिली आवृत्ती, २०१९

प्रकल्प समन्वयक / PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR

विभा सुराणा / VIBHA SURANA

ले खक / AUTHORS
गौरी ब्रह्मे / GAURI BRAHME
अदिती गुप्ते / ADITI GUPTE
सुहास लिमये / SUHAS LIMAYE

संपादक / EDITORS
मेहर
े भूत / MEHER BHOOT
विभा सुराणा / VIBHA SURANA
आन�द काटीकर / ANAND KATIKAR

संपादकीय मंडळ / EDITORIAL TEAM

माधुरी पुरंदरे / MADHURI PURANDARE
ज्योत्स्ना भिडे / JYOTSNA BHIDE
सोनाली गुजर / SONALEE GUJAR

कला, मांडणी, चित्रे / छायाचित्रे / अक्षर जुळणी

LAYOUT DESIGN / PHOTOS / TYPESETTING
नागेश सिरसाल / NAGESH SIRSAL
सुभाष गोपाळे / SUBHASH GOPALE

प्रकाशक / PUBLISHER
मुंबई विद्यापीठ / UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI,
राज्य मराठी विकास संस्था, मुंबई / RAJYA MARATHI VIKAS SANSTHA, MUMBAI

ई-पत्ता /E-MAIL
[email protected]

संकेतस्थळ / WEBSITE ADDRESS

https://www.learn-marathi.com
www.rmvs.maharashtra.gov.in

TEXT- CUM WORKBOOK AND 1 FREE DVD ` 500

 प्रस्तावना | Preface
Nursing has always been considered as one of the noble professions and even today is much
sought after, especially in Mumbai. A large number of nurses working in various hospitals in
Maharashtra, especially in Mumbai, hail mostly from South India, viz. Kerala and Tamil Nadu. The
regional language Marathi poses a major barrier for them, especially when dealing with patients
in government hospitals. परिचारिकांसाठी मराठी is a Marathi text-cum-workbook specially designed
for such nurses. It addresses a target group of non-native nurses, who wish to learn Marathi as
beginners, particularly as adult learners, with or without any prior, little/random knowledge of
Marathi. Whether the learners have some prior acquaintance with the Devnagari script or not,
they can start learning the script as well as reading and writing in Marathi.

A first of its kind, this book has been prepared using an integrated communicative approach. It
dedicates itself to serve the sole purpose of teaching Marathi to the non-native nurses and for
them to be able to communicate in Marathi with the native patients, their relatives, doctors, co-
workers and the hospital management. It focuses on understanding the problems of patients and
giving them the right guidance and instructions in Marathi.

The book consists of ten chapters, each with units such as communicative texts in authentic
situations, pattern drills, grammar exercises, learning games, cartoons, answer keys, audio visual
components and an overview of the vocabulary along with its meanings in English. At the end
of each chapter there is a section of subject related information highlighting the specialised
vocabulary needed by the nurses for their routine chores, for e.g. contagious diseases, health and
nutrition etc. In addition to this, a comprehensive glossary from English to Marathi is provided at
the end. A final test has been included at the end to test the written and oral language skills of
the learners. Special efforts have been taken to integrate the communicative approach of learning
so that the learners will be able to communicate in a non-native environment.

Though the book is meant for classroom teaching of approximately 60 teaching hours, self-
learners too can make use of the book with the help of the vocabulary given with the meanings
in English and a glossary at the end. The course instructor may require 6 hours for each chapter.
Regular dictation, additional exercises, tests and extra inputs may be used as per the target group.
The course instructors are expected to use the audio-visual material, provided as free dvd with
the book. Keeping in mind the aim of the target learners, which is basically to communicate,
the instructor should stress on enhancing the speaking, listening and understanding skills of the
learners. The writing skills are not so important for this target group. Hence the instructors are
advised to undergo rigorous teachers’ training for the integrated communicative approach and
may contact the project co-ordinator / editors / Rajya Marathi Vikas Sanstha for the same.

'Communicative Marathi for Nurses' has been designed after an extensive research and a survey
carried out in various government and private hospitals in Mumbai. The content and preparation
of material of the book is based on the data collected from these surveys. It is created solely for
teaching communicative Marathi to the nurses and does not claim to impart medical knowhow.
The book aims to offer general information required by nurses for the daily routine and refrains
from mention of specific ailments and illnesses.

This book has been prepared under the aegis of the project Marathi Language Teaching (MLT)
spearheaded by Prof. Dr. Vibha Surana, Head of the Department of German, University of Mumbai
and graciously funded by Rajya Marathi Vikas Sanstha. The innovative project MLT strives to
complete six levels of courses for teaching communicative Marathi to non-native speakers and
four short-term courses for teaching Marathi to (i) non-native bank employees, (ii) government
officials, (iii) nurses and (iv) rickshaw- and taxi-drivers.

We are indebted to the editorial team of Madhuri Purandhare, Jyotsna Bhide and Sonalee Gujar
for reviewing this book and their invaluable inputs. We thank Girissha Tilak, Kruttika Bhosale,
Shrikant Pathak, Sammati Balgi, Mihir Kulkarni, Gurunath Kalamkar, Gurudutt Kamath, Saurabh
Bhosale, Manish Bawker, Disha Gudulkar for their sustained support and assistance. We are
grateful to Mr. Charuhas Pandit and Mr. Prabhakar Wadekar for the copyright permission of
Chintoo cartoon strips. We also thank Mrs. Sunita Deshmukh, senior nurse of Dr. Bedekar
Hospital for Women and Children and the nurses Harsha Shinde, Namrata Malusare, Shubhangi
Gogavle, Vandana Jadhav and Varsha Gawde for their photos and Mr. Sachin Suresh and Mr.
Rajesh Wadekar for the audio recording and the making of the DVD respectively.

We appreciate and thank all those who have contributed in the making of this book.

Gauri Brahme, Aditi Gupte, & Suhas Limaye

2019
 अनुक्रमणिका
पाठ विषय संवादकौशल्य व्याकरण शब्दसंपदा परिस्थिती पृष्ठ क्र.

१ ओळख अभिवादन, स्वर-स्वरादी काय, कोणता, कुठे, व्यवसायात कोण ७

नाव-गाव आणि व्यंजन कोण, कसा, कशी, कोण आहेत?
स्वतःबद्दल सांगणे, स्वरचिन्हे कुठले, कुठल्या, परिचारिका, सिस्टर,
व्यवसाय सांगणे व शब्द अच्छा, टाटा, ठीक वॉर्डबॉय, डॉक्टर,
इतरांना त्याबद्दल जोडाक्षरे आहे, चालेल, उद्या फिझ़िऑथेरपिस्ट,
विचारणे, शब्द भेटू, नमस्कार, ऑपरे शन
मराठी वर्णमाला विशेष उच्चार व्यवसाय थिएटरमध्ये
सोपे मराठी शब्द वाक्ये अंक : १-२० सहाय्यिका...
प्रश्नशब्द महत्त्वाचे : शरीराचे
भाग व अवयव

२ रुग्णालय रुग्णालय आणि व्यक्तिवाचक सर्वनामे, किती वाजले? रुग्णालयाचे विभाग : २४

वॉर्डबद्दल सामान्य वर्तमानकाळ : कोणता, कोणते, कान / नाक / घसा
वेळ, दिवस व महिना असणे, नसणे, कोणती, कोणत्या, विभाग, बालरोग
आणणे, देणे, ठिकाणे, विभाग...
क्रियाविशेषणे : वर, खाली, अंक : २१-५०, महत्त्वाचे :
जवळ, उजवीकडे, डावीकडे महिने आणि दिवस रुग्णालयाची
रचना – एका
परिचारिकेच्या
नजरे तून

३ तुम्हाला दैनंदिन व्यवहार, साधा आणि अपूर्ण केव्हा / कधी आरोग्याच्या ४६

काय इच्छा व्यक्त करणे, वर्तमानकाळ हवंय, पाहिजे समस्यांबद्दल बोलणे,
होतंय? दिवसाच्या वेळा, दर्शक सर्वनामे कळतंय, पटतंय वेगवेगळ्या प्रकारच्या
ऋतू नामे : लिं ग वस्तूंची नावे, उपचारांसाठी गरज
असणे : रीतिवर्तमानकाळ आजार, महत्त्वाचे : आतले
अंक : ५०-१०० अवयव

४ एक आज्ञा, सूचना, आज्ञार्थी, क्रियापदे व त्यांची कर, करा पेशंटच्या ७०

दिवस सल्ला, नकारार्थी रूपे, करू नकोस, करू नातेवाइकांना,
सूचनांचा विनंती, आभार, विशेषणे नका, सफाईकामगारांना,
परवानगी देणे / कृपया... सहकाऱ्यांना सूचना
नाकारणे, लवकर, सावकाश, देणे
रं ग हळू, जपून, महत्त्वाचे : विविध
१०० च्या पुढील सूचनाफलक वाचणे
अंक

५ आता महत्त्वाची लक्षणे षष्ठी विभक्ती, प्रश्नशब्द, माहितीपत्रके ८६

तब्येत तपासणे व नोंद अप्रत्ययी कर्म, चा, ची, चे, च्या, समजणे,
कशी करणे, चिकित्सा, रीतिवाचक क्रियाविशेषण अनेकदा, पटपट, लक्षणांबद्दल चर्चा
आह?े आढावा घेणे आपोआप, उगीच करणे
महत्त्वाचे : विविध
व्यवसाय
पाठ विषय संवादकौशल्य व्याकरण शब्दसंपदा परिस्थिती पृष्ठ क्र.

६ लक्षणे भूतकाळातली गोष्ट, असणे : होतो / होत नाही, नेहमी, सध्या, काल, वेदना आणि उपाय १०१
समस्या सांगणे, सामान्य भूतकाळ ‘होणे’, दररोज, हल्ली, महत्त्वाचे :
काय त्रास होत आहे कालवाचक क्रियाविशेषणे कधीतरी, पेशंटचे बेड कसे
ते सांगणे कुपोषण तयार करायचे?

७ औषधे व औषधोपचार, वर्तमानकाळ, भूतकाळ फार, कमी, भरपूर, औषधांची माहिती १२०
उपचार आहाराबद्दलच्या आणि नकारार्थी : असणे, किंचित, अत्यंत, आणि नोंद,
पद्धती सूचना, द्वितीया संप्रदान चतुर्थी, जरा, औषध कसे घ्यावे
आहाराबद्दलची परिमाण वाचक विविध खाद्यपदार्थ महत्त्वाचे : पौष्टिक
आवड-नावड क्रियाविशेषण आहार

८ चाचण्या इच्छा व्यक्त करणे, साधा भविष्यकाळ : येईन, बाजूला, मागे, वर, विविध १३६
व पत्र वाचणे, जाईन, घेईन, जवळ, लांब, मध्ये तपासण्यांसाठी,
तपासण्या तपासणी व गुणविशेषण संख्याविशेषण सुंदर, घाण... ऑपरे शनपूर्व सूचना
पूर्वतयारी, दहावा, देणे
रिपोर्ट वाचणे चाळीसावा... महत्त्वाचे :
संसर्गजन्य रोग

९ अपघात पेशंटचा रिपोर्ट कालदर्शक क्रियाविशेषणे आज, काल, उद्या, दुसऱ्या नर्सवर काम १५५
आणि लिहिणे, नातेवाईकांशी चतुर्थी विभक्ती परवा. पूर्वी, हल्ली, सोपवणे,
तातडीची बोलणे, सामान्य रूपे आजकाल, अपघाताचे वर्णन,
सेवा इतर परिचारिकांशी ला आणि ना नातेवाईकांना शांत
संवाद साधणे, करणे,
कुटु ब
ं पेशंटला धीर देणे
महत्त्वाचे :
ज्येष्ठ नागरिकांशी
संवाद

१० स्वच्छता स्वतःची आणि कालदर्शक क्रियाविशेषणे आधी, नंतर, पुन्हा, स्वच्छतेचे महत्त्व, १७४
रुग्णालयातील लगेच सफाईपत्रक
स्वच्छता, पण, आणि, महत्त्वाचे : पेशंटचे
काम करून घेणे स्वच्छतेची साधने स्पंजिंग कसे करावे?
सूचना देणे

११ दृक् श्राव्य १९१

१२ परीक्षा १९७

१३ उत्तरे २०७

१४ शब्दसंग्रह २३४
 ओळख
१

ओळख १

चला, शिकू या :
अभिवादन करणे
आपले नाव-गाव आणि स्वतःबद्दल सांगणे आणि
विचारणे
व्यवसाय सांगणे व इतरांना त्याबद्दल विचारणे
मराठी वर्णमाला आणि सोपे मराठी शब्द वाचणे
आणि लिहिणे
प्रश्नशब्द (काय, कुठून, कुठे , कशा, कोण)
अंक : १-२०

meele 7
 ओळख
१

• हाय, मी सुरेश शर्मा.

• मी भोपाळचा.
• मी डॉक्टर आहे.

• नमस्ते, मी लक्ष्मण शेट.े

• मी मुंबईचा.
• मी वॉर्डबॉय आहे.

• नमस्ते, मी संदीप माने.

• मी नागपूरचा.
• मी सफाईकामगार आहे.

8 Deeþ
 ओळख
१

• नमस्कार, मी चित्रा राजन.

• मी केरळची.
• मी परिचारिका (नर्स) आहे.

• नमस्कार, मी अनिता घोष.

• मी कोलकात्याची.
• मी मेट्रन आहे.

• हॅलो, मी रजनी.
• मी पुण्याची.
• मी स्वागतिका (रिसेप्शनिस्ट) आहे.

veT 9
 ओळख
१

१ आता तुमच्याबद्दल सांगू या.

तुमचं नाव काय? चित्रा राजन ---------------------------

तुम्ही कुठल्या? केरळची ---------------------------

तुम्ही काय करता? मी परिचारिका आहे. ---------------------------

१.१ वाचू या.

नमस्कार / नमस्ते / हॅलो / हाय

तुमचं नाव काय? माझं नाव --------- / मी ---------

तुम्ही कुठले / कुठल्या? मी ----------- चा / ची.

तुम्ही कोणता व्यवसाय करता? मी ----------- आहे.

अच्छा / टाटा / उद्या भेटू / उद्या भेटू या

१.२ रिकाम्या जागी पुढीलपैकी योग्य शब्द लिहू या.

अभिवादन : नमस्कार / -------------------- / ------------------- / --------------------

प्रश्न : ------------------------------------ उत्तर : --------------------------------------

प्रश्न : ------------------------------------ उत्तर : --------------------------------------

प्रश्न : ------------------------------------ उत्तर : --------------------------------------

निरोप घेणे : --------------- / टाटा / --------------- / ---------------

10 one
 ओळख
१

१.३ ऐकू या आणि वाचू या.

स्वर :-

अ आ इ ई
उ ऊ ए अॅ ऐ
ओ ऑ औ
ऋ
स्वरादी उदा∘ :-

अं अः
DekeÀje 11
 ओळख
१

व्यंजने :-

क ख ग घ ङ
च छ ज झ ञ
ट ठ ड ढ ण
त थ द ध न
प फ ब भ म
य र ल व
श ष स
ह ळ क्ष ज्ञ
12 yeeje
 ओळख
१

१.४ ऐकू या आणि वाचू या.

अक्षर सण पटकन एकदम सरळ घर
बडबड फणस लक्ष पळ जग मन
अक्षय, घर बघ. अनय, फणस उचल. पलक, पटकन पळ.

१.५ स्वरचिन्हे.
क् + अ = क क् + आ = का क् + इ = कि क् + ई = की

क् + उ = कु क् + ऊ = कू क् + ए = के क् + ऐ = कै

क् + ओ = को क् + औ = कौ क् + अॅ = कॅ क् + ऑ = कॉ

क् + ॠ = कृ क् + अं = कं क् + अः = कः

१.६ स्वरचिन्हांचा वापर शिकू या.

‘क’ ला काना का ‘क’ ला काना आणि एक मात्रा को

‘क’ ला पहिली वेलांटी ऱ्हस्व कि ‘क’ ला काना आणि दोन मात्रा कौ

‘क’ ला दुसरी वेलांटी दीर्घ की ‘क’ वर अर्धचंद्र कॅ

‘क’ ला पहिला उकार ऱ्हस्व कु ‘क’ ला काना आणि वर अर्धचंद्र कॉ

‘क’ ला दुसरा उकार दीर्घ कू ‘क’ ला ऋकार कृ

‘क’ वर एक मात्रा के ‘क’ वर अनुस्वार कं

‘क’ वर दोन मात्रा कै ‘क’ पुढे विसर्ग कः

१.७ वाचू या.

अ क् + अ क कप
आ ा छ् + ा छा छान
इ ि द् + ि दि दिवस
ई ी ह् + ी ही बहीण
उ ु क् + ु कु कुलूप
ऊ ू फ् + ू फू फूल
ए े ख् + े खे खेळ
अॅ ॅ ब् + ॅ बॅ बॅग
ऐ ै प् + ै पै पैसे
ओ ो म् + ो मो मोदक

lesje 13
 ओळख
१

ऑ ॉ ह् + ॉ हॉ हॉल
औ ौ ह् + ौ हौ हौस
अं ं प् + ं पं पंख
अः ः त् + ः तः अंतःकरण
ऋ ृ न् + ृ नृ नृत्य

१.८ वाचू या.

क का कि की कु कू के कॅ कै को कॉ कौ कं कः
ख खा खि खी खु खू खे खॅ खै खो खॉ खौ खं खः
ग गा गि गी गु गू गे गॅ गै गो गॉ गौ गं गः
घ घा घि घी घु घू घे घॅ घै घो घॉ घौ घं घः

च चा चि ची चु चू चे चॅ चै चो चॉ चौ चं चः
छ छा छि छी छु छू छे छॅ छै छो छॉ छौ छं छः
ज जा जि जी जु जू जे जॅ जै जो जॉ जौ जं जः
झ झा झि झी झु झू झे झॅ झे झो झॉ झौ झं झः

ट टा टि टी टु टू टे टॅ टै टो टॉ टौ टं टः
ठ ठा ठि ठी ठु ठू ठे ठॅ ठै ठो ठॉ ठौ ठं ठः
ड डा डि डी डु डू डे डॅ डै डो डॉ डौ डं डः
ढ ढा ढि ढी ढु ढू ढे ढॅ ढै ढो ढॉ ढौ ढं ढः
ण णा णि णी णु णू णे णॅ णै णो णॉ णौ णं णः

त ता ति ती तु तू ते तॅ तै तो तॉ तौ तं तः
थ था थि थी थु थू थे थॅ थै थो थॉ थौ थं थः
द दा दि दी दु दू दे दॅ दै दो दॉ दौ दं दः
ध धा धि धी धु धू धे धॅ धै धो धॉ धौ धं धः
न ना नि नी नु नू ने नॅ नै नो नॉ नौ नं नः

प पा पि पी पु पू पे पॅ पै पो पॉ पौ पं पः
फ फा फि फी फु फू फे फॅ फै फो फॉ फौ फं फः
ब बा बि बी बु बू बे बॅ बै बो बॉ बौ बं बः
भ भा भि भी भु भू भे भॅ भै भो भॉ भौ भं भः
म मा मि मी मु मू मे मॅ मै मो मॉ मौ मं मः

14 ®eewoe
 ओळख
१

य या यि यी यु यू ये यॅ यै यो यॉ यौ यं यः

र रा रि री रु रू रे रॅ रै रो रॉ रौ रं रः

ल ला लि ली लु लू ले लॅ लै लो लॉ लौ लं लः

व वा वि वी वु वू वे वॅ वै वो वॉ वौ वं वः

श शा शि शी शु शू शे शॅ शै शो शॉ शौ शं शः

ष षा षि षी षु षू षे षॅ षै षो षॉ षौ षं षः

स सा सि सी सु सू से सॅ सै सो सॉ सौ सं सः

ह हा हि ही हु हू हे हॅ है हो हॉ हौ हं हः

ळ ळा ळि ळी ळु ळू ळे ळॅ ळै ळो ळॉ ळौ ळं ळः

क्ष क्षा क्षि क्षी क्षु क्षू क्षे क्षॅ क्षै क्षो क्षॉ क्षौ क्षं क्षः

ज्ञ ज्ञा ज्ञि ज्ञी ज्ञु ज्ञू ज्ञे ज्ञॅ ज्ञै ज्ञो ज्ञॉ ज्ञौ ज्ञं ज्ञः

२ वाचू या.
तो ती ते

कप – cup कळ – pain पाणी – water

ताप – fever गोळी – tablet, pill

हात – hand बाटली – bottle

आजार – illness

आराम – rest

कागद – paper

वास – smell

२.१ खालील चित्रे पाहून शब्द पूर्ण करा.

१. गो----- २. -----त ३. क----- ४. -----णी ५. -----ली

HebOeje 15
 ओळख
१

३ अवयव वाचू या

तो डोळा, ते डोळे ती जीभ, त्या जिभा ते कपाळ, ती कपाळे / कपाळं

eye, -s tongue, -s forehead, -s

तो कान, ते कान ती हनुवटी, त्या हनुवट्या ते डोके / डोकं, ती डोकी

ear, -s chin, -s head, -s

तो गाल, ते गाल ती हिरडी, त्या हिरड्या ते नाक, ती नाके / नाकं

cheek, -s gum, -s nose, -s

तो ओठ, ते ओठ ती मान, त्या माना ते तोंड, ती तोंडे / तोंडं

lip, -s neck, -s mouth, -s

तो दात, ते दात ती कंबर, त्या कंबरा ते पोट, ती पोटे / पोटं

tooth, teeth waist, -s stomach, -s

तो केस, ते केस ती पाठ, त्या पाठी ते ढुग

ं ण, ती ढुग
ं णे / ढुग
ं णं
hair back, -s butt, -s

तो घसा, ते घसे ती छाती, - ते ढोपर, ती ढोपरे / ढोपरं

(internal) throat, -s chest, -s knee, -s

तो गळा, ते गळे ती योनी, - ते कोपर, ती कोपरे / कोपरं

(external) throat, -s vagina, -s elbow, -s

तो खांदा, ते खांदे ती मांडी, त्या मांड्या ते मनगट, ती मनगटे / मनगटं

shoulder, -s thigh, -s wrist, -s

तो स्तन, ते- ती पोटरी, त्या पोटऱ्या ते बोट, ती बोटे / बोटं

breast, -s calf, calves finger, -s

तो दंड, ते दंड ते नख, ती नखे / नखं

upper arm, -s nail, -s

तो हात, ते हात ते पाऊल, ती पावले / पावलं

hand, -s foot, feet

तो तळहात, -
palm, -s

तो गुडघा, ते गुडघे
knee, -s

तो पाय, ते पाय
leg, -s

16 meesUe
 ओळख
१

३.१ अवयव ओळखू या आणि लिहू या.

खांदा, मांडी, बोट, हात, गुडघा, कोपर, पाऊल, पंजा, कान, डोकं, पोट.

meleje 17
 ओळख
१

३.२ क्रिया : अवयव?

१. पाहणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

२. ऐकणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ कान नाक हात तोंड

३. स्पर्श करणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ पाय डोळे दात बोट

४. चावणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

५. चालणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

६. लिहिणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

७. श्वास घेणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

८. खाणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

३.३ कोणता आजार कोणत्या अवयवाला होतो?

१. फ्रॅ क्चर ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

२. िकडणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙
दात नाक कान पोट हात
३. पडदा फाटणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

४. घोळणा वाहणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

५. फुगणे ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

४ वाचू या.

तुमचे नाव काय? – माझे नाव अचला.

तुम्ही कशा आहात? – मी छान / मजेत आहे.

तुम्ही कुठल्या? – मी नागपूरची.

तुम्ही कुठे राहता? – मुंबईमध्ये / मुंबईत.

तुम्ही काय काम करता? – मी परिचारिका आहे.

४.१ मराठीतील प्रश्नशब्द ‘क’ च्या बाराखडीतील अक्षराने सुरू होतात. वरील
संवाद वाचून त्यातील प्रश्नशब्द अधोरे खित करा.

18 Deþje
 ओळख
१

४.२ जोड्या जुळवू या.

प्रश्न उत्तर

१. काय? अ. ठीक, मस्त, छान, बरी

२. कशा? ब. नाव, गाव, वस्तू

३. कुठल्या? क. पोलीस, परिचारक, शिक्षिका, नर्स

४. कुठे? ड. नागपूरची, पुण्याची, कोचीची, दिल्लीची

५. कोणता व्यवसाय? इ. मुंबई, जमशेदपूर, चेन्नईमध्ये

१. ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ २. ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ ३. ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ ४. ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ ५. ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

४.३ विद्यार्थ्यांचे दोन दोनचे गट करून फोटोतील व्यक्तीची वरील प्रश्नांच्या

आधारे मुलाखत घ्या व त्या उत्तरांची वर्गात चर्चा करा.

५ चला, वाचू आणि ऐकू या.

परिचारिका १ : नमस्कार, माझं नाव ललिता शेट्टी. तुमचं नाव काय?

परिचारिका २ : नमस्ते, माझं नाव छाया जाधव.

परिचारिका १ : अच्छा. तुम्ही कुठे राहता?

परिचारिका २ : मी ठाण्यात राहते. तुम्ही कुठल्या?

परिचारिका १ : मी कोचीची. मी कल्याणला राहते.

परिचारिका २ : अच्छा. मग तुम्ही इथे काय करता?

परिचारिका १ : मी परिचारिका आहे.

परिचारिका २ : ओह! मी पण नर्स आहे. चला, नंतर भेटू.

परिचारिका १ : चालेल. टाटा.

SkeÀesCeerme 19
 ओळख
१

५.१ वरील संवाद वाचून माहिती लिहू या.

व्यक्ती १ व्यक्ती २

नाव : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ नाव : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

कुठल्या? : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ कुठल्या? : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

व्यवसाय : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ व्यवसाय : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

मी कल्याणचा/ची

तुम्ही कुठ + ले? तुम्ही कुठ + ल्या?

मी ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ चा. मी ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ ची.

६ वाचू या.
१ एक ६ सहा ११ अकरा १६ सोळा

२ दोन ७ सात १२ बारा १७ सतरा

३ तीन ८ आठ १३ तेरा १८ अठरा

४ चार ९ नऊ १४ चौदा १९ एकोणीस

५ पाच १० दहा १५ पंधरा २० वीस

६.१ खालील शब्द अंकात लिहू या.

शून्य : _____, एक : १, दोन : _____, तीन : ____, चार : _____, पाच :____,

सहा : ____, सात : ___, आठ : _____, नऊ : _____, दहा : ____, अकरा :____, बारा : १२.

६.२ रिकाम्या जागी अंक भरू या.

क) १, २, ३, ___, ५, ___, ७, ___, ९, ___, ११, ___, १३, ___, १५, १६, ___, १८, ___, ___.

ख) खेळू या :

• शिक्षकाने फळ्यावर एक ते वीस अंक लिहावेत व एका विद्यार्थिनीला समोर यायला

सांगावे. शिक्षक एक संख्या सांगतील, विद्यार्थिनी योग्य संख्येभोवती गोल करेल.

• शिक्षक – विद्यार्थिनी : आपण िकती नंबरच्या वॉर्डमध्ये काम करता?

20 Jeerme
 ओळख
१

७ जोडाक्षरे शिकू या.

च् + च = कच्चा ख् + ख = लख्ख ट् + ट = अट्टल
क् + क = पक्का ज् + ज = सज्ज
ग् + ग = रग्गड ठ् + ठ = मठ्ठ

७.१ याच प्रमाणे आता आपण लिहू या.

उदा° अक्कल : क् + क

अत्तर : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

चप्पल : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

अव्वल : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

अय्या : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

सल्ला : ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

७.२ वाचू या.

त् + य = त्य सत्य ड् + य = ड्य घड्याळ द् + य = द्य विद्या
ळ् + य = ळ्य पोळ्या स् + ट = स्ट पोस्ट म् + ह = म्ह म्हण

७.३ याच प्रमाणे आता आपण लिहू या.

क् + य = वाक्य

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ = डॉक्टर

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ = स्वर

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ = पुस्तक

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ = शब्द

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ = रस्ता

७.४ वाचू या.

क् + र = क्र क्रम त् + र = त्र मित्र

म् + र = म्र नम्र र् + ष् = र्ष वर्ष

ट् + र = ट्र ट्र क र् + य = र्य सूर्य

ड् + र = ड्र ड्र म र् + य = ऱ्या सुऱ्या

SkeÀJeerme 21
 ओळख
१

७.५ याचप्रमाणे आता आपण लिहू या.

त् + र = मित्र

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ = ग्रह

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ = बर्फ

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ = कैऱ्या

˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ + ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ = ट्रेन

८ आपले शरीर
चित्राखाली अक्षरे दिली आहेत, त्यांना काना लावून शरीराच्या अवयवाचे नाव लिहा.

१. क – कान २. क – क˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ळ ३. प – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙य ४. द – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙त

दृि�टक्षेप

तो डॉक्टर, ते- ती परिचारिका, त्या- ते नाव, ती नावे

doctor, -s nurse, -s name, -s

तो वॉर्डबॉय, ते- ती मेट्रन, त्या- ते पाणी, –

ward boy / ward boys matron, -s water

तो सफाईकामगार, ते- ती बाटली, त्या बाटल्या

cleaner / cleaners bottle, -s

तो हात, ते- ती गोळी, त्या गोळ्या

hand, -s tablet, -s

तो कान, ते- ती कळ, त्या कळा

ear, -s pain

तो डोळा, ते डोळे
eye, -s

तो आराम, –
rest

तो पाय, ते-
leg, -s

22 yeeJeerme
 ओळख
१

तो आजार, ते-
illness, -es

तो ताप, –
fever

तो वास, ते-
smell, -s

तो कागद, ते-
paper, -s

सर्वनाम क्रियापद प्रश्नशब्द इतर शब्द

Pronouns Verbs Question words Other words

मी – I राहणे – to stay कोण – who मध्ये – in

माझं – mine / my असणे – to be कुठल्या; कुठले सुद्धा – also

– from where

तुम्ही – you भेटणे – to meet काय – what उद्या – tomorrow

तुमचं – your / yours करणे – to do कशा; कसे – how

कुठे – where

शिष्टाचार शब्द
Courtesy words

नमस्कार / नमस्ते – Hello

हॅलो – Hello

हाय – Hi

अच्छा – Ok / Bye

टाटा – Bye

lesJeerme 23
 रुग्णालय
२

२ रुग्णालय

चला, शिकू या :
वॉर्डची माहिती देणे
सर्वनामे
सामान्य वर्तमानकाळ : असणे, नसणे
अंक : २१-५०
वर, खाली, उजवीकडे, डावीकडे
किती वाजले , वेळ सांगणे
दिवस व महिने

24 ®eesJeerme
 रुग्णालय
२

१ आपले वॉर्ड.

मी सिस्टर सुनीता. मी बालरोग

विभागात काम करते. मी लहान
मुलांकडे लक्ष देते.

१. सिस्टर सुनीता कोणत्या विभागात काम करते?

सिस्टर सुनिता --------------------------------- विभागात काम करते.

मी सिस्टर रोझी. मी दंतचिकित्सा

विभागात काम करते. तुमच्या
दातांची काळजी घेते.

२. सिस्टर रोझी कोणत्या विभागात काम करते?

सिस्टर रोझी --------------------------------- विभागात काम करते.

Heb®eJeerme 25
 रुग्णालय
२

१.१ रुग्णालयात कोणकोणते विभाग असतात ते पाहू या.

खालील चित्रे पाहून योग्य जोड्या लावू या.

क ख ग घ

च छ ज झ

१. नेत्रचिकित्सा विभाग (Opthalmology Department) – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

२. अस्थिरोग विभाग (Orthopaedic Department) – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

३. हृदयरोग विभाग (Cardiology Department) – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

४. कान, नाक, घसा विभाग (Ear, Nose and Throat Department) – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

५. दंतचिकित्सा विभाग (Dentistry Department) – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

६. प्रसूति विभाग (Department of Gynaecology) – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

७. बालरोग विभाग (Department of Pediatrics) – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

८. नेफ्रॉलॉजी विभाग (Department of Nephrology) – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

तुम्ही कोणत्या विभागात काम करता?

मी --------------------------------- विभागात काम करते.

26 meJJeerme
 रुग्णालय
२

१.२ आपले शरीर : चित्रे पाहून अवयवांची नावे लिहू या.

१. न – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙क २. ड – डो˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ ३. बो – बो˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

४. ग – गु˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙घा ५. म – म˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ग˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

२ अंक : १-५०. वाचन आणि सराव.

१ एक ११ अकरा २१ एकवीस ३१ एकतीस ४१ एकेचाळीस

२ दोन १२ बारा २२ बावीस ३२ बत्तीस ४२ बेचाळीस

३ तीन १३ तेरा २३ तेवीस ३३ तेहतीस ४३ त्रेचाळीस

४ चार १४ चौदा २४ चोवीस ३४ चौतीस ४४ चव्वेचाळीस

५ पाच १५ पंधरा २५ पंचवीस ३५ पस्तीस ४५ पंचेचाळीस

६ सहा १६ सोळा २६ सव्वीस ३६ छत्तीस ४६ शेहच

े ाळीस

७ सात १७ सतरा २७ सत्तावीस ३७ सदतीस ४७ सत्तेचाळीस

८ आठ १८ अठरा २८ अठ्ठावीस ३८ अडतीस ४८ अठ्ठेचाळीस

९ नऊ १९ एकोणीस २९ एकोणतीस ३९ एकोणचाळीस ४९ एकोणपन्नास

१० दहा २० वीस ३० तीस ४० चाळीस ५० पन्नास

meÊeeJeerme 27
 रुग्णालय
२

२.१ वाचू या.

आमच्या रुग्णालयात एकूण ४० खोल्या आहेत. त्यांपैकी प्रसूति विभागासाठी २७ आणि बालरोग

विभागासाठी १३ खोल्या आहेत. इथे आम्ही १४ डॉक्टर्स, १८ परिचारिका, ६ वॉर्डबॉय व १०

सफाईकामगार असे एकूण ४८ लोक काम करतो.

२.२ वरील परिच्छे दातील अंक शब्दात लिहू या.

१. ४० – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ २. २७ – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

३. १३ – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ ४. १४ – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

५. ६ – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ ६. १८ – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

६. १० – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ ७. ४८ – ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙

३ महिने.

जानेवारी

फेब्रुवारी

मार्च

एप्रिल

मे

जून

जुलै

ऑगस्ट

सप्टेंबर

ऑक्टोबर

नोव्हेंबर

डिसेंबर

28 DeÇeJeerme
 रुग्णालय
२

३.१ सोडवू या.

१. हा सप्टेंबर महिना आहे.

हा मार्च महिना आहे.
पुढचा महिना कोणता आहे?

उत्तर : ᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔ पुढचा महिना एप्रिल आहे.

मागचा महिना फेब्रुवारी होता.
मागचा महिना कोणता होता?

उत्तर : ᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔

२. हा महिना कोणता आहे?

उत्तर : ᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔

पुढचा महिना जून आहे.

मागचा महिना कोणता होता?

उत्तर : ᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔

३. हा महिना कोणता आहे?

उत्तर : ᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔

मागचा महिना ऑगस्ट होता. पुढचा महिना कोणता आहे?

उत्तर : ᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔

३.२ वाचू आणि ऐकू या.

अनिता : नमस्कार, मी अनिता. आपलं नाव?

अरुणा : माझं नाव अरुणा. आपण काय करता?

अनिता : मी परिचारिका आहे. मी बाह्यरुग्ण विभागात काम करते.

आपण कोणत्या विभागात काम करता?

अरुणा : मी शल्यचिकित्सा विभागात काम करते. सिस्टर अनिता, आजची

तारीख कोणती आहे, ते तुम्ही सांगू शकता का?

अनिता : आज १२ तारीख आहे. मार्च महिना.

अरुणा : धन्यवाद. बरं , तुम्ही कधीपासून मुंबईमध्ये राहता?

अनिता : मी फेब्रुवारीपासून मुंबईमध्ये राहते.

SkeÀesCeleerme 29
 रुग्णालय
२

४ जोड्या जुळवू या.

१ क खाली

उजवीकडे
ख
२ वर

३ ग जवळ
डावीकडे

४ घ सरळ

५ च उजवीकडे

सरळ

६ छ डावीकडे

५ शब्द वाचू या व लिहू या.

तो ती ते

घसा – throat सुई – needle कापड – cloth

आवाज – noise खोली – room चाक – wheel

गाल – cheek चादर – bed sheet दार – door

मोजा – sock जखम – wound

पलं ग – cot

१. दा᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔ २. ᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔ई ३. गा᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔ ४. चा᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔ ५. ᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔᳔ली

30 leerme
 रुग्णालय
२

६ वाचू या.

१ : नमस्कार. शल्यचिकित्सा विभाग

(Surgery Department) कुठे आहे?

२ : इथून सरळ जा. शल्यचिकित्सा

विभाग डावीकडे आहे.

१ : हॅलो, जनरल वॉर्ड कुठे आहे?

२ : जनरल वॉर्ड खाली आहे.

६.१ वरीलप्रमाणे संवाद बनवू या.

१. बाह्यरुग्ण विभाग – उजवीकडे

२. दंतचिकित्सा विभाग – डावीकडे

३. वॉर्ड नंबर ४ – ?

४. डॉक्टर सिन्हांची केबिन – ?

SkeÀleerme 31
 रुग्णालय
२

६.२ तुम्ही रुग्णाला कोणत्या विभागात जायला सांगाल? योग्य पर्याय निवडू या.

उदा∘ सिस्टर, माझ्या बायकोची सोनोग्राफी करायचीय.

अ) कान, नाक, घसा विभागात जा.

ब) रेडिऑलॉजी विभागात जा.

क) नेत्रचिकित्सा विभागात जा.

१. सिस्टर, माझे डोळे आले आहेत.

अ) दंतचिकित्सा विभागात जायला सांगा.

ब) फिझ़िऑथेरपी विभागात जायला सांगा.

क) नेत्रचिकित्सा विभागात जायला सांगा.

२. सिस्टर, रक्ताची बाटली हवी आहे.

अ) रक्तपेढीत जायला सांगा.

ब) बालरोग विभागात जायला सांगा.

क) सुविधा विभागात जायला सांगा.

३. सिस्टर, माझ्या भावाला अपघात झाला आहे.

अ) प्रसूति विभागात जायला सांगा.

ब) ट्रॉमा केअर युनिटमध्ये जायला सांगा.

क) नेत्रचिकित्सा विभागात जायला सांगा.

४. सिस्टर, माझा एक्स-रे काढायचा आहे.

अ) मनोविकृती विभागात जायला सांगा.

ब) जळीत विभागात जायला सांगा.

क) क्ष-किरण विभागात जायला सांगा.

32 yeÊeerme
 रुग्णालय
२

६.३ रुग्णालयातील विभाग. योग्य जोड्या जुळवू या.

क. प्रसूती १. Intensive Care Unit

ख. रक्त तपासणी २. ENT department

ग. नेत्र तपासणी ३. Rheumatology department

घ. अस्थिरोग विभाग ४. Gynaecology

च. कान नाक घसा तपासणी ५. Neonatal Care

छ. नवजातशिशुदक्षता ६. Opthalmology

ज. अतिदक्षता विभाग ७. Blood tests

क. _____ ख. _____ ग. _____ घ. _____ च. _____ छ. ____ ज. _____

६.४ पेशंटला समस्या आहे. तुम्ही त्यांना कुठे जायला सांगाल?

(आँकॉलॉजी, रक्त व लघवी तपासणी, ओपीडी, शस्त्रक्रिया, रक्तपेढी)

१. सिस्टर, मला लघवी तपासणीकरता जायचे आहे.

तुम्ही ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ विभागामध्ये जा.

२. सिस्टर, कॅन्सर तपासणी कुठे होते?

तुम्ही ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ विभागामध्ये जा.

३. सिस्टर, माझ्या मुलाचं मेंदूचं ऑपरे शन आहे.

तुम्ही ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ विभागामध्ये जा.

४. सिस्टर, मला डॉक्टरांना पाय दाखवायचा आहे.

तुम्ही ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ विभागामध्ये जा.

५. सिस्टर, ऑपरे शनसाठी रक्ताची बाटली लागणार आहे.

तुम्ही ˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙˙ मध्ये जा.

७ वाचू या.
• हॅलो, सकीना, तू इथे काय करतेस?

मी इथे नर्सिंगचे शिक्षण घेते.

• नमस्कार, सारिकाताई आणि मालाताई, तुम्ही इथे काय करता?

आम्ही इथे सफाईचं काम करतो.

• नमस्कार, डॉक्टर खुराना, आपण इथे काय करता?

मी इथे सर्जन आहे.

lesnleerme 33
 रुग्णालय
२

सर्वनाम

एकवचन अनेकवचन / आदरार्थी

मी आम्ही / आपण

तू तुम्ही / आपण

तो ते

ती त्या

ते ती

ती + ते ते
तो + ती
तो + ते

मी आम्ही आपण

मी मुंबईमध्ये राहते. आम्ही मुंबईमध्ये राहतो. आपण मुंबईमध्ये राहतो.

मी मुबं ईमध्ये आहे. आम्ही मुबं ईमध्ये आहोत. आपण मुबं ईमध्ये आहोत.

तू तुम्ही/आपण तुम्ही/आपण

तू कुठे राहतोस? तुम्ही / आपण कुठे राहता? तुम्ही / आपण कुठे राहता?
मी मुंबईमध्ये राहतो. आम्ही मुंबईमध्ये राहतो. मी मुंबईमध्ये राहतो.

34 ®eewleerme
 रुग्णालय
२

तो ते

तो मुंबई मध्ये राहतो. ते मुंबईमध्ये राहतात.

तो मुंबईमध्ये आहे. ते मुंबईमध्ये आहेत.

ती त्या

ती कुठे राहते? त्या मुंबईमध्ये राहतात.

ती कुठे आहे? त्या मुंबईमध्ये आहेत.

ते ती

ते कुठे राहतं? ती मुंबईमध्ये राहतात.

ते कुठे आहे? ती मुंबईमध्ये आहेत.

Hemleerme 35
Other documents randomly have
different content
of Rome, was the refusal of the pope to grant him a divorce from his first
wife, and to gratify his desires in a dispensation for a second marriage.'
"Ergo: The first cause of the Reformation, was the satisfying an inordinate
and brutal passion. But is he sure of this? If he be not, it is a horrible calumny
upon our church, upon King Henry the Eighth, and the whole nation, as I shall
presently show. No; he confesses he cannot be sure of it: for, saith he, no
man can carry it so high as the original cause with any certainty. And at the
same time, he undertakes to demonstrate the immediate cause to be Henry
the Eighth's inordinate and brutal passion; and afterwards affirms, as
confidently as if he had demonstrated it, that our Reformation was erected on
the foundations of lust, sacrilege, and usurpation: Yet, saith he, the king only
knew whether it was conscience or love, or love alone, which moved him to
sue for a divorce. Then, by his favour, the king only could know what was the
immediate cause of that which he calls the schism. Well! but he offers at
some probabilities, that lust was the true cause. Is Ergoteering come to this
already? 'But this we may say, if Conscience had any part in it, she had taken
a long nap of almost twenty years together before she awakened.' Doth he
think, that Conscience doth not take a longer nap than this in some men, and
yet they pretend to have it truly awakened at last? What thinks he of late
converts? Cannot they be true, because conscience hath slept so long in
them? Must we conclude in such cases, that some inordinate passion gives
conscience a jog at last? 'So that it cannot be denied, he saith, that an
inordinate and brutal passion had a great share at least in the production of
the schism.' How! cannot be denied! I say from his own words it ought to be
denied, for he confesses none could know but the king himself; he never
pretended that the king confessed it: How then cannot it be denied? Yea, how
dare any one affirm it? Especially when the king himself declared in a solemn
assembly, in these words, saith Hall, (as near, saith he, as I could carry them
away,) speaking of the dissatisfaction of his conscience,—"For this only cause,
I protest before God, and in the word of a prince, I have asked counsel of the
greatest clerks in Christendom; and for this cause I have sent for this legat, as
a man indifferent, only to know the truth, and to settle my conscience, and for
none other cause, as God can judge." And both then and afterwards, he
declared, that his scruples began upon the French ambassador's making a
question about the legitimacy of the marriage, when the match was proposed
between the Duke of Orleans and his daughter; and he affirms, that he
moved it himself in confession to the Bishop of Lincoln, and appeals to him
concerning the truth of it in open court."—Vindication of the Answer to some
late Papers, p. 109.
 Note VIII.

They say, that, look the Reformation round,

No treatise of humility is found;
But if none were, the gospel does not want,
Our Saviour preached it, and I hope you grant,
The sermon on the mount was Protestant.—P. 204.

Stillingfleet concludes his "Vindication" with this admonition to Dryden: "I

would desire him not to end with such a bare-faced assertion of a thing so
well known to be false, viz. that there is not one original treatise written by a
Protestant, which hath handled distinctly, and by itself, that Christian virtue of
humility. Since within a few years (besides what hath been printed formerly)
such a book hath been published in London. But he doth well to bring it off
with, 'at least that I have seen or heard of;' for such books have not lain
much in the way of his inquiries. Suppose we had not such particular books,
we think the Holy Scripture gives the best rules and examples of humility of
any book in the world; but I am afraid he should look on his case as
desperate if I send him to the Scripture, since he saith, 'Our divines do that as
physicians do with their patients whom they think uncurable, send them at
last to Tunbridge-waters, or to the air of Montpellier."
Dryden, in the Introduction, says, that the author of this work was called
Duncombe; but he is charged with inaccuracy by Montague, who says his
name is Allen. It seems to be admitted, that his work is a translation from the
Spanish. The real author may have been Thomas Allen, rector of Kettering, in
Northamptonshire, and author of "The Practice of a Holy Life, 8vo. 1716;" in
the list of books subjoined to which, I find "The Virtue of Humility,
recommended to be printed by the late reverend and learned Dr Henry
Hammond," which perhaps may be the book in question. A sort of similarity of
sound between Duncombe and Hammond may have led to Dryden's mistake.
Alonzo Rodriguez, of the Order of the Jesuits, wrote a book called "Exercicio
de perfecion y virtudes Christianas, Sevilla, 1609," which seems to be the
work from which the plagiary was taken.

Note IX.
Unpitied Hudibras, your champion friend,
Has shown how far your charities extend;
This lasting verse shall on his tomb be read,
"He shamed you living, and upbraids you dead." P. 205.

Our author, in the preceding lines, had employed himself in repelling the
charge of his having changed his religion for the sake of interest. His loaves,
he says, had not been increased by the change, nor had his assiduity at court
intimated any claim upon royal favour: and in reference to her neglect of
literary merit, he charges on the church of England the fate of Butler, a
brother poet. Of that truly original genius we only know, that his life was
spent in dependence, and embittered by disappointment. But unless Dryden
alludes to some incident now unknown, it is difficult to see how the church of
England could have rewarded his merit. Undoubtedly she owed much to his
forcible satire against her lately triumphant rivals, the Presbyterians and
Independents; but, unless Butler had been in orders, how could the church
have recompensed his poetical talents? The author of the most witty poem
that ever was written had a much more natural and immediate claim upon the
munificence of the wittiest king and court that ever was in England; nor was
his satire less serviceable to royalty than to the established religion. The
blame of neglecting Butler lay therefore on Charles II. and his gay courtiers,
who quoted "Hudibras" incessantly, and left the author to struggle with
obscurity and indigence. The poet himself has, in a fragment called "Hudibras
at Court," set forth both the kind reception which Charles gave the poem, and
his neglect of the author:
Now you must know, Sir Hudibras
With such perfections gifted was,
And so peculiar in his manner,
That all that saw him did him honour.
Among the rest, this prince was one,
Admired his conversation:
This prince, whose ready wit and parts
Conquered both men and women's hearts,
Was so o'ercome with Knight and Ralph,
That he could never claw it off;
He never eat, nor drank, nor slept,
But Hudibras still near him kept;
Nor would he go to church, or so,
But Hudibras must with him go;
Nor yet to visit concubine,
Or at a city feast to dine,
But Hudibras must still be there,
Or all the fat was in the fire.
Now after all, was it not hard,
That he should meet with no reward,
That fitted out this knight and squire,
This monarch did so much admire?
That he should never reimburse
The man for th' equipage, or horse,
Is sure a strange ungrateful thing,
In any body but a king.
But this good king, it seems, was told,
By some that were with him too bold,
If e'er you hope to gain your ends,
Caress your foes, and trust your friends.
Such were the doctrines that were taught,
Till this unthinking king was brought
To leave his friends to starve and die,
A poor reward for loyalty!

Note X.
With odious atheist names you load your foes;
Your liberal clergy why did I expose?
It never fails in charities like those.—P. 205.

Our author here complains of the personal reflections which Stillingfleet had
cast upon him, particularly in the passage already quoted in Note VII., where
he is expressly charged with disbelieving the existence of "such a thing as
true religion." The second and third lines of the triplet are somewhat obscure.
The meaning seems to be, that Dryden, conscious of having given the first
offence, which we shall presently see was the case, justifies his having done
so, from personal abuse being the never-failing resort of the liberal clergy.
The application of the neuter pronoun it to the liberal clergy, is probably in
imitation of Virgil's satirical construction:

Varium et mutabile semper fæmina.

It happened in this controversy, as in most others, that both parties, laying

out of consideration the provocation which they themselves had given,
complained bitterly of the illiberality of their antagonists. Stillingfleet
expatiates on the unhandsome language contained in Dryden's Defence, and
the passages which he quotes are those which contain the exposure of the
liberal clergy mentioned in the text:
"Yet as if I had been the sole contriver or inventor of all, he bestows those
civil and obliging epithets upon me, of disingenuous, foul-mouthed, and
shuffling; one of a virulent genius, of spiteful diligence, and irreverence to the
royal family; of subtle calumny, and sly aspersion; and he adds to these
ornaments of speech, that I have a cloven-foot, and my name is Legion; and
that my Answer is an infamous libel, a scurrilous saucy pamphlet. Is this
indeed the spirit of a new convert? Is this the meekness and temper you
intend to gain proselytes by, and to convert the nation? He tells us in the
beginning, that truth has a language peculiar to itself: I desire to be informed,
whether these be any of the characters of it? And how the language of
reproach and evil-speaking may be distinguished from it? But zeal in a new
convert is a terrible thing; for it not only burns, but rages, like the eruptions of
Mount Ætna; it fills the air with noise and smoke, and throws out such a
torrent of liquid fire, that there is no standing before it. The Answer alone was
too mean a sacrifice for such a Hector in controversy. All that standeth in his
way must fall at his feet. He calls me Legion, that he may be sure to have
number enough to overcome. But he is a great proficient indeed, if he be such
an exorcist, to cast out a whole legion already. But he hopes it may be done
without fasting and prayer."—Vindication of the Answer, p. 1.

Note XI.

It now remains for you to school your child,

And ask why God's anointed he reviled;
A king and princess dead! Did Shimei worse? P. 207.

The Hind having shewn that her influence over Dryden was such as to induce
him to submit patiently, and without vengeance, to injury and reproach, now
calls upon the Panther to exert her authority in turn over Stillingfleet, for his
irreverend attack upon the royal papers in favour of the Catholic religion.
Upon a careful perusal of the Answers and Vindication of that great divine, it
is impossible to find any grounds for the charge of his having reviled Charles
II. or the Duchess of York; on the contrary, their names are always mentioned
with great respect, and the controversy is conducted strictly in conformity
with the following spirited advertisement prefixed to the Answer:
"If the papers, here answered, had not been so publicly dispersed through the
nation, a due respect to the name they bear, would have kept the author from
publishing any answer to them. But because they may now fall into many
hands, who, without some assistance, may not readily resolve some
difficulties started by them, he thought it not unbecoming his duty to God and
the king, to give a clearer light to the things contained in them. And it can be
no reflection on the authority of a prince, for a private subject to examine a
piece of coin as to its just value, though it bears his image and superscription
upon it. In matters that concern faith and salvation, we must prove all things,
and hold fast that which is good."—Advertisement to Answer to the Royal
Papers.
Dryden, however, like the other Catholics, was pleased to interpret the
impugning and confuting the arguments used by the king and duchess, into
contempt and disrespect for their persons. It was this forced construction on
which was founded the prosecution of Sharpe and of the Bishop of London
before the ecclesiastical commissioners. Sharpe having been defied to a
polemical contest, by a paper handed into his pulpit, took occasion to preach
on the arguments contained in it; and mentioned, with some contempt,
persons who could be influenced by such weak reasoning. This was
interpreted as a reflection on the new converts, and particularly on the king
himself; and a mandate was issued to the Bishop of London, commanding
that the obnoxious preacher should be suspended. The issue of this matter
has been noticed in the notes on "Absalom and Achitophel," Vol. IX. p. 302.

Note XII.

Your son was warned, and wisely gave it o'er;

But he, who counselled him, has paid the score. P. 207.

Dryden here triumphs in the conquest he pretends to have gained over

Stillingfleet. In the beginning of the controversy, the Dean of St Paul's had
spoken dubiously of the authenticity of the paper ascribed to the Duchess. In
his Vindication, he fully admitted that point, and insisted only upon the
weakness of the reasons which she alleged for her conversion. This Dryden
compares to a defeated vessel, bearing away under the smoke of her last
broadside.
The person, whom he states to have counselled Stillingfleet, is probably
Burnet; and the score which he paid, is the severe description given of him
under the character of the Buzzard. Dryden always seems to have viewed the
Answer to the Royal Papers as the work of more than one hand. In his
"Defence," he affirms, that the answerer's "name is Legion; but though the
body be possessed with many evil spirits, it is but one of them that talks." In
the introduction to the "Hind and Panther," he says, he is informed both of the
"author and supervisors of this pamphlet." He conjectured, as was probably
the truth, that a controversy of such importance, and which required to be
managed with such peculiar delicacy, was not entrusted to a single individual.
Besides Burnet, it is probable that Tillotson, Tennison, and Patrick, all of
whom mingled in the polemical disputes of that period, were consulted by
Stillingfleet on this important occasion.

Note XIII.

Perhaps you think your time of triumph near,

But may mistake the season of the year;
The Swallow's fortune gives you cause to fear.—P. 210.
The general application of the fable of the Swallows to the short gleam of
Catholic prosperity during the reign of James II. is sufficiently manifest. But it
is probable, that a more close and intimate allusion was intended to an event
which took place in 1686, when the whole nation was in confusion at the
measures of King James, so that the alarm had extended even to the
Catholics, who were the objects of his favour. We are told, there was a
general meeting of the leading Roman Catholics at the Savoy, to consult how
this favourable crisis might be most improved to the advantage of their cause.
Father Petre had the chair; and at the very opening of the debates, it
appeared, that the majority were more inclined to provide for their own
security, than to come to extremities with the Protestants. Notwithstanding
the King's zeal, power, and success, they were afraid to push the experiment
any farther. The people were already alarmed, the soldiers could not be
depended upon, the very courtiers melted out of their grasp. All depended on
a single life, which was already on the decline; and if that life should last yet a
few years longer, and continue as hitherto devoted to their interest and
service, they foresaw innumerable difficulties in their way, and anticipated
disappointments without end. Upon these considerations, therefore, some
were for a petition to the king, that he would only so far interpose in their
favour, that their estates might be secured to them by act of parliament, with
exemption from all employments, and liberty to worship God in their own way,
in their own houses. Others were for obtaining the king's leave to sell their
estates, and transport themselves and their effects to France. All but Father
Petre were for a compromise of some sort or other; but he disdained
whatever had a tendency to moderation, and was for making the most of the
voyage while the sea was smooth, and the wind prosperous. All these several
opinions, we are farther told, were laid before the king, who was pleased to
answer, "That before their desires were made known to him, he had provided
a sure retreat and sanctuary for them in Ireland, in case all those endeavours
which he was making for their security in England should be blasted, and
which as yet gave him no reason to despair."[272]
It will hardly, I think, be disputed, that the fable of the Swallows about to
cross the seas refers to this consultation of the Catholics; and it is a strong
instance of Dryden's prejudice against priests of all persuasions, that, in the
character of the Martin, who persuaded the Swallows to postpone the flight,
he decidedly appears to have designed Petre, the king's confessor and prime
adviser in state matters, both spiritual and temporal. The name of Martin may
contain an allusion to the parish of St Martin's, in which Whitehall, and the
royal chapel, are situated. But should this be thought fanciful, it is certain,
that the portrait of this vain, presumptuous, ambitious, bigotted Jesuit, who
was in keen pursuit of a cardinal's cap, is exactly that of the Martin:

A church begot, and church believing bird,

Of little body, but of lofty mind,
Round-bellied, for a dignity designed.

Two marked circumstances of resemblance conclude the inuendo,—his noble

birth, and superficial learning;

But little learning needs in noble blood.[273]

It may be doubted, whether the reverend father was highly pleased with this
sarcastic description, or whether he admitted readily the apology, that the
poet, speaking in the character of the heretical church, was obliged to use
Protestant colouring.
The close correspondence of the fable with the real events may be farther
traced, and admit of yet more minute illustration:

The Raven, from the withered oak,

Left of their lodging,——

may be conjectured to mean Tennison, within whose parish Whitehall was

situated, and who stood in the front of battle during all the Roman Catholic
controversy. As Petre is the Martin who persuaded the Catholics not to leave
the kingdom, his preparations for maintaining their ground there are also
noticed:

He ordered all things with a busy care,

And cells and refectories did prepare,
And large provisions laid of winter fare.

This alludes to the numerous schools and religious establishments which the
Jesuits prepared to establish throughout England.[274] The chapel which
housed them is obviously the royal chapel, where the priests were privileged
to exercise their functions even during the subsistence of the penal laws. The
transient gleam of sunshine which invited the Swallows forth from their
retirement, is the Declaration of Indulgence, in consequence of which the
Catholics assumed the open and general exercise of their religion. The Irish
Catholics, with the sanguine Talbot at their head, may be the first who hailed
the imaginary return of spring: they are painted as

——Swifts, the giants of the Swallow kind,

Large limbed, stout hearted, but of stupid mind.

I cannot help thinking, that our author, still speaking in the character of the
English church, describes himself as the "foolish Cuckow," whose premature
annunciation of spring completed the Swallow's delusion. Perhaps he intended
to mitigate the scornful description of Petre, by talking of himself also as a
Protestant would have talked of him. The foreign priests and Catholic officers,
whom hopes of promotion now brought into England, are pointed out by the
"foreign fowl," who came in flocks,

To bless the founder, and partake the cheer.

The fable concludes in a prophetic strain, by indicating the calamities which

were likely to overwhelm the Catholics, as soon as the death of James, or any
similar event, should end their temporary prosperity. It is well known, how
exactly the event corresponded to the prophecy; even the circumstance of the
rabble rising upon the Catholic priests was most literally verified. In most of
the sea-port towns, they watched the coasts to prevent their escape; and
when King James was taken at Feversham, the fishermen, by whom he was
seized, were employed in what they called by the cant phrase of "priest-
codding," that is, lying in wait for the fugitive priests.

Note XIV.

But most in Martin's character and fate,

She saw her slandered sons, the Panther's hate,
The people's rage, the persecuting state.—P. 217.

The conclusion of the fable naturally introduces a discussion of the penal

laws, which unquestionably were extremely severe towards Catholics. By the
fourteenth of Queen Elizabeth, it was enacted, that whoever, by bulls of the
pope, should reconcile any one to Rome, should, together with the person
reconciled, be guilty of high treason; that those, who relieved such
reconcilers, should be liable in the penalties of a premunire, and those who
concealed them in misprision of treason. A still more severe law passed in the
twenty-eighth of the same queen, upon discovery of Parry's conspiracy
against her life, to which he had been stirred up by a book of Allen, or
Parsons the Jesuit, written for the express purpose. It was thereby enacted,
that all Jesuits and Popish priests should depart the kingdom within forty
days; and that those who should afterwards return into the kingdom, should
be guilty of high treason; and all who relieved and maintained them, of felony.
There were other enactments of a similar nature made upon the discovery of
the gun-powder plot. Samuel Johnson (I mean the divine) gives an odd
justification of these laws, saying, that the priests are hanged, not as priests,
but as traitors. But, as their being priests was the sole reason for their being
held traitors, it does not appear, that the Protestant divine can avail himself of
this distinction.

Note XV.

No church reformed can boast a blameless line,

Such Martins build in yours, and more than mine;
Or else an old fanatic author lies,
Who summed their scandals up by centuries.—P. 218.

The fanatic author is John White, commonly called Century White. He was
born in Pembrokeshire in 1590, was educated for the bar, and made a
considerable figure in his profession. As he was a rigid puritan, he was chosen
one of the trustees which that sect appointed to purchase impropriations to
be bestowed upon fanatic preachers. This design was checked by Archbishop
Laud; and White, among others, received a severe censure in the Star-
Chamber. In the Long Parliament, White was member for Southwark, and
distinguished himself by his vindictive severity against the bishops and
Episcopal clergy, saying openly in a committee, he hoped to live to see the
day, when there should be neither bishop nor cathedral priest in England. He
was very active in the ejectment of the clergy, by which upwards of eight
thousand churchmen are said to have lost their cures in the course of four or
five years. In order to encourage and justify these violent measures, he
published his famous treatise, entitled, "The First Century of Scandalous
Malignant Priests, made and admitted into benefices by the Prelates, London,
1643;" a tract which contains, as may be inferred from its name, an hundred
instances of unworthiness, which had been either proved to have existed
among the clergy of the church of England, or had been invented to throw a
slander upon them. When this satire was shown to Charles I., it was proposed
to answer it by a similar exposition of the scandalous part of the puritanical
teachers; but that monarch would not consent to give countenance to a
warfare in which neither party could gain, and religion was sure to be a loser
between them. Similar considerations are said to have prevented White
himself from publishing "A Second Century," in continuation of his work. He
wrote another tract, entitled, "The Looking Glass;" in which he attempted to
prove, that the sin against the Holy Ghost was the bearing arms for the king
in the civil war. His own party bestow on White a high character for religion
and virtue; but the cavaliers alleged, that although he had two wives of his
own, a large proportion of matrimony, he did not forbear to visit three
belonging to his neighbours in the White Friars. He died in January 1644, and
is said, in his last illness, to have bitterly lamented the active share which he
had taken in ejecting so many guiltless ministers, and their families. This,
however, may be a fiction of the royalists; for the death-bed repentance of an
enemy is amongst the most common forgeries of party. White's body was
attended to the grave by most of the members of Parliament, and the
following distich inscribed on his tomb:

"Here lyeth a John, a burning shining light,

His name, life, actions, all were White."
See Wood's Athenæ Oxonienses.

Note XVI.

The Lion, studious of our common good,

Desires (and kings' desires are ill withstood)
To join our nations in a lasting love;
The bars betwixt are easy to remove,
For sanguinary laws were never made above.—P. 218.

When James II. ascended the throne, deceived by the general attachment of
the church of England for his person, and the little jealousy which they
seemed to entertain of his religion, he conceived there would be no great
difficulty in procuring a reconciliation between the national church and that of
Rome. With this view he made a favourable declaration of his intentions to
maintain the church of England as by law established, and certainly expected,
that, in return, they would consent to the repeal of the test act and penal
laws;[275] and this, it was conceived, might pave the way for uniting the
churches. An extraordinary pamphlet, already quoted, recommends such an
union, founded upon the mutual attachment of both communions to King
James, upon their success in resisting the Bill of Exclusion, and their common
hatred of the dissenters. "This very stone, which was once rejected by the
architects, is now become the chief stone in the corner. We may truly see in it
the hand of God, and look upon it with admiration; and may expect, if fears
and jealousies hinder not, the greatest blessings we can wish for. An union
betwixt these two walls, which have been thus long separated, and now in a
fair way to be united and linked together by this corner stone; after which,
how glorious a structure may we hope for on such foundations!" A plan is
therefore laid down, containing the following heads, of which it may be
observed, that the very first is the abrogation of these penal laws, which
Dryden states to be the principal bar between the alliance of the Hind and the
Panther.
"First, that it may be provided, That those who are known to be faithful
friends to the king and kingdom's good, may equally with us enjoy those
favours and blessings we may hope for under so great and so just a king,
without being liable to the sanguinary penal laws, for holding opinions noways
inconsistent with loyalty, and the peace and quiet of the nation; and that they
may not be obliged, by oaths and tests, either to renounce their religion,
which they know they cannot do without sacrilege, or else to put themselves
out of capacity of serving their king and country.
"Secondly, That, for healing our differences, it be appointed, that neither side,
in their sermons, touch upon matters of controversy with animating
reflections; but that those discourses may wholly tend to peace and piety,
religion and sound morality; and that, in all public catechisms, the solid
grounds and principles of religion may be solely explicated and established, all
reflecting animosities being laid aside.
"Thirdly, That some learned, devout, and sober persons, may be made choice
of on both sides, who may truly state matters of controversy betwixt us; to
the end, each one may know others pretensions, and the tenets they cannot
abandon, without breaking the chain of apostolic faith; which, if it be done,
we shall, it may be, find that to be true, which the Papists often tell us, that
the difference betwixt them and us is not so great as many make it; nor their
tenets so pernicious, but if we saw them naked, we should, if not embrace
them as truths, yet not condemn them as errors, much less as pernicious
doctrines. Yet if, notwithstanding all this, we cannot perfectly agree in some
points, let us, however, endeavour to live together in the bonds of love and
charity, as becomes good Christians and loyal subjects, and join together to
oppugn those known maxims, and pernicious errors, which destroy the
essence of religion, loyalty, and good government."—Remonstrance, by way of
Address, to the Church of England, 1685.

Note XVII.

Yet still remember, that you wield a sword,

Forged by your foes against your sovereign lord;
Designed to hew the imperial cedar down,
Defraud succession, and dis-heir the crown.—P. 219.

The Test-act was passed in the year 1678, while the popish plot was in its
vigour, and the Earl of Shaftesbury was urging every point against the
Catholics, with his eyes uniformly fixed upon the Bill of Exclusion as his
crowning measure. It imposed on all who should sit in parliament, a
declaration of their abhorrence of the doctrine of transubstantiation. The Duke
of York, with tears in his eyes, moved for a proviso to exempt himself,
protesting, that he cast himself upon the House in the greatest concern he
could have in the world; and that whatever his religion might be, it should
only be a private thing between God and his own soul. Notwithstanding this
pathetic appeal, he carried his point but by two votes. With seven other peers
he protested against the bill. Dryden therefore, and probably with great
justice, represents this test as a part of his machinations against the Duke of
York, whose party was at that time, and afterwards, warmly espoused by the
church of England. But though the Test-act was devised by a statesman whom
they hated, and carried by a party whom they had opposed, the high-church
clergy were not the less unwilling to part with it when they found the
advantages which it gave them against the Papists in King James's reign.
Hence they were loaded with the following reproaches: "My business is to set
forth, in its own colours, the extraordinary loyalty of those men, who
obstinately maintain a test contrived by the faction to usher in the Bill of
Exclusion: And it is much admired, even by some of her own children, that the
grave and matron-like church of England, which values herself so much for
her antiquity, should be over-fond of a new point of faith, lately broached by a
famous act of an infallible parliament, convened at Westminster, and guided
by the holy spirit of Shaftesbury. But I doubt there are some parliaments in
the world which will not so easily admit this new article into their creed,
though the church of England labours so much to maintain it as a special
evidence of her singular loyalty."—New Test of the Church of England's
Loyalty.

Note XVIII.

The first reformers were a modest race;

Our peers possessed in peace their native place,
And when rebellious arms o'erturned the state,
They suffered only in the common fate;
But now the sovereign mounts the regal chair,
And mitred seats are full, yet David's bench is bare.—P. 221.

This passage regards the situation of the Roman Catholic peers.

Notwithstanding their religion, they had been allowed to retain their seats and
votes in the House of Lords. So jealous were they, (as was but natural,) of this
privilege, that, in 1675, when Danby proposed a test oath upon all holding
state employments and benefices, the object of which was to acknowledge
the doctrine of non-resistance, and disown all attempts at an alteration of
government, the Roman Catholic peers, to the number of twenty, who had
hitherto always voted with the crown, united, on this occasion, with the
opposition, and occasioned the loss of the bill. This North imputes to the art
of Shaftesbury, who dinned into their ears, "that this test (by mentioning the
maintenance of the Protestant religion, though that of the royal authority was
chiefly proposed) tended to deprive them of their right of voting, which was a
birth-right so sacrosanct and radically inherent in the peerage, as not to be
temerated on any account whatsoever." When the earl had heated the
Catholic lords with this suggestion, he secured them to the opposition, by
proposing, and carrying through, an order of the House, that no bill should be
received, tending to deprive any of the peerage of their right. But when the
Test-act of 1678 was moved, which had, for its direct purpose, that exclusion
which that of 1675 was supposed only to convey by implication, Shaftesbury
laughed at the order which he himself had proposed, saying, leges posteriores
priores abrogant. And by this test, which required the renunciation of their
religion as idolatrous, the Catholic peerage were effectually, and for ever,
excluded from their seats in the House of Lords. Dryden intimates, in the
following lines, that this test applied to the Papists alone, and complains
heavily of this odious distinction, betwixt them and other non-conformists.
 Note XIX.

When first the Lion sat with awful sway,

Your conscience taught your duty to obey.—P. 223.

James II. and the established church set out on the highest terms of good
humour with each other. This, as the king afterwards assured the dissenters,
was owing to the professions made to him by some of the churchmen, whom
he named, who had promised favour to the Catholics, provided he would
abandon all idea of general toleration, and leave them their ancient authority
over the fanatics. Moved, as he said, by these promises, the Declaration in
council, issued upon his accession, had this remarkable clause: "I know the
principles of the church of England are for monarchy, and the members of it
have shewn themselves good and loyal subjects, therefore I shall always take
care to defend and support it." This explicit declaration gave the greatest
satisfaction to the kingdom in general, and particularly to the clergy. "All the
pulpits of England," says Burnet, "were full of it, and of thanksgivings for it. It
was magnified as a security far greater than any that laws could give. The
common phrase was, We have now the word of a king, and a word never yet
broken. This general feeling of gratitude led to a set of addresses, full of the
most extravagant expressions of loyalty and fidelity to so gracious a
sovereign. The churchmen led the way in these expressions of zeal; and the
university of Oxford, in particular, promised to obey the king without
limitations or restrictions." The king's promise was reckoned so solemn and
inviolable, that those addresses were censured as guilty at least of ill-
breeding, who mentioned in their papers the "religion established by law;"
since that expression implied an obligation on the king to maintain it,
independently of his royal grace and favour. But the scene speedily changed,
as the king's intentions began to disclose themselves. Then, as a Catholic
pamphleteer expresses himself, "My loyal gentlemen were so far out of the
right bias, that, in lieu of taking off the tests and penal laws, which all people
expected from them in point of gratitude and good manners, they made a
solemn address to his majesty, that none be employed who were not
capacitated by the said laws and tests to bear offices civil and military."[276]
If James, had viewed with attention the incidents of the former reign, he
might have recollected, that, however devoted the clergy had then shown
themselves to the crown, his brother's attempt at his present measure of a
general indulgence had at once alarmed the whole church. This sensibility,
when the interest of the church is concerned, is severely contrasted with the
general indifference to the cause of freedom, into which they relapsed when
the indulgence was recalled, in a party pamphlet of the year 1680-1. "You
may easily call to mind, a late instance of the humanity and conscience of this
race of men here in England: For when his majesty, not long since, attempted
to follow his own inclinations, and emitted a declaration of indulgence to
tender consciences, the whole posse cleri seemed to be raised against him:
Every reader and Gibeonite of the church could then talk as saucily of their
king, as they do now of the late honourable Parliament; nay, they began to
stand upon their terms, and delivered it out as orthodox doctrine, that the
king was to act according to law, and, therefore, could not suspend a penal
statute; that the subjects' obedience was a legal obedience; and, therefore, if
the king commanded any thing contrary to law, the subject was not bound to
obey; with so many other honest positions, that men wondered in God how
such knaves should come by them. But wherefore was all this wrath, and all
this doctrine? merely because his majesty was pleased for a time to remove
the sore backs of dissenters from under the ecclesiastical lash; the bloody
exercise of which is never denied to holy church, but the magistrate is
immediately assaulted with the noise and clamour of Demetrius and his
craftsmen.
"But now, the tables being turned, the same mercenary tongues are again all
Sibthorp, and all Manwaring; not a bit of law, or conscience either, is now to
be had for love or money; not any limits to be put to the king's commands, or
our obedience. It is a gospel truth with these men, that all which we have is
the king's; and if he should command our estates, our wives and children,
yea, and our religion too, we ought to resign them up, submit, and be
silent."—The Freeholders' Choice, or, A Letter of Advice concerning Elections.

Note XX.

Possess your soul with patience, and attend;

A more auspicious planet may ascend;
Good fortune may present some happier time,
With means to cancel my unwilling crime.—P. 224.

The first expression in these lines seems to have been a favourite with
Dryden. In the Introduction to the Translation of Juvenal, he makes it his
glory, "that, being naturally vindicative, he had suffered in silence, and
possessed his soul in quiet."
The arguments used by the Panther in this passage seem to have more
weight than her antagonist allows them. It was surely reasonable, that the
church of England should rest upon her penal statutes and test act, as the
sole mode of preventing the encroachments of her rival during a Catholic
reign, and at the same time that she should look forward with pleasure to a
future period, when such severe enactments might be no longer necessary for
her safety; a time, of which it has been our good fortune to witness the
arrival.
The argument of the Panther, in this speech, is, with the simile of the
inundation, literally versified from an answer to Penn's pamphlet. "The penal
laws cannot prejudice the Papists in this king's reign, seeing he can connive at
the non-execution of them, and the repeal of them now cannot benefit the
Papists when he is gone; because, if they do not behave themselves modestly,
we can either re-establish them, or enact others, which they will be as little
fond of. But their abrogation at this time would infallibly prejudice us, and
would prove to be the pulling up of the sluices, and the throwing down the
dikes, which stem the deluge that is breaking in upon us, and which hinder
the threatening waves from overflowing us." Some reflections on a discourse,
entitled, "Good Advice to the Church of England."—State Tracts, Vol. I. p. 368.

Note XXI.

Your care about your banks infers a fear

Of threatening floods and inundations near;
If so, a just reprise would only be
Of what the land usurped upon the sea.—P. 225.

This conveys a perilous insinuation, which perhaps it would, at the time, have
been prudent to suppress; since it goes the length of preparing a justification
of the resumption of the power, authority, lands, and revenues, of the church
of England, upon the footing of their having originally belonged to that of
Rome. It cannot be supposed that this hint could be passed over at the time,
without a strong feeling of a meditated revolution in church government and
property.

Note XXII.
Behold how he protects your friends oppressed,
Receives the banished, succours the distressed!
Behold, for you may read an honest open breast.—P. 225.

Burnet, in the "History of his Own Times," gives the following account of the
relief which James, either from inclination or policy, extended to the French
Protestants, who were exiled by the recal of the edict of Nantes.
"But now the session of Parliament drew on, and there was a great
expectation of the issue of it. For some weeks before it met, there was such a
number of refugees coming over every day, who set about a most dismal
recital of the persecution in France; and that in so many instances that were
crying and odious, that, though all endeavours were used to lessen the
clamour this had raised, yet the king did not stick openly to condemn it as
both unchristian and unpolitic. He took pains to clear the Jesuits of it, and laid
the blame of it chiefly on the king, on Madame de Maintenon, and the
Archbishop of Paris. He spoke often of it with such vehemence, that there
seemed to be an affectation in it. He did more: He was very kind to the
refugees; he was liberal to many of them; he ordered a brief for a charitable
collection over the nation for them all; upon which great sums were sent in.
They were deposited in good hands, and well distributed. The king also
ordered them to be denizen'd, without paying fees, and gave them great
immunities. So that, in all, there came over, first and last, between forty and
fifty thousand of that nation. There was such real argument of the cruel and
persecuting spirit of popery, wheresoever it prevailed, that few could resist
this conviction; so that all men confessed, that the French persecution came
very seasonably to awaken the nation, and open men's eyes in so critical a
conjunction; for upon this session of Parliament all did depend."—Burnet,
Book IV.

Note XXIII.

A plain good man, whose name is understood,

(So few deserve the name of plain and good.)—P. 226.

These, and the following lines, contain a character of James II. most
exquisitely drawn, though, it must be owned, with a flattering pencil. Bravery,
economy, integrity, are the ingredients which Dryden has mixed for his
colours. Without attempting a character of this unfortunate monarch, we may
say a few words on each of the attributes ascribed to him. Bravery he
unquestionably possessed; but it was of that ordinary kind, which, though
unshaken by mere personal danger, is unable to sustain its possessor in great
and embarrassing political emergencies. The economy of James, being one
great engine by which he hoped to carry on his projects, was so rigid as
sometimes to border upon avarice. His upright integrity, the virtue upon which
he chiefly prided himself, and which was the usual theme of courtly panegyric,
frequently deviated into obstinacy. When he had once resolved upon a
measure, he often announced his resolution with imprudence, and almost
always pressed it with an open disregard of consequences. No fault can be
more fatal to an English king; because the stream of popular opinion, which
would subside if unopposed, becomes irresistible when the obstinacy of a
monarch persists in attempting to stem it.

Note XXIV.

A sort of Doves were housed too near their hall,

Who cross the proverb, and abound with gall.—P. 228.

The virulent and abusive character which our author here draws of the clergy,
and particularly those of the metropolis, differs so much from his description
of the church of England, in the person of the Panther, that we may conclude
it was written after the publishing of the Declaration of Indulgence, when the
king had decidedly turned his favour from the established church. Their
quarrel was now irreconcileable, and at immediate issue; and Dryden
therefore changes the tone of conciliation, with which he had hitherto
addressed the heretic church, into that of bitter and unrelenting satire.
Dryden calls them doves, in order to pave the way for terming them, as he
does a little below, "birds of Venus;" as disowning the doctrine of celibacy.
The popular opinion, that a dove has no gall, is well known. In Scotland, this
is averred to be owing to the dove which Noah dismissed from the ark having
flown so long, that his gall broke; since which occurrence, none of the species
have had any.

Note XXV.
An hideous figure of their foes they drew,
Nor lines, nor looks, nor shades, nor colours true;
And this grotesque design exposed to public view.—P. 231.

The Roman Catholic pamphlets of the time are filled with complaints, that
their principles were misrepresented by the Protestant divines; and that king-
killing tenets, and others of a pernicious or absurd nature, were unjustly
ascribed to them. A tract, which is written on purpose to explain their real
doctrine, says, "Is it not strange and severe, that principles, and those
pretended of faith too, should be imposed upon men which they themselves
renounce and detest? If the Turks' Alcoran should, in like manner, be urged
upon us, and we hanged up for Mahometans, all we could do or say, in such a
case, would be, to die patiently, with protestations of our own innocence. And
this is the posture of our condition; we abhor, we renounce, we abominate,
such principles; we protest against them, and seal our protestations with our
dying breath. What shall we say, what can we do more? To accuse men as
guilty in matters of faith, which they never owned, is the same thing as to
condemn them for matters of fact which they never did."[277] Another author,
speaking in the assumed character of the established church, says, that the
Catholic controvertists have often told us, that "we behave ourselves like
persons diffident of our cause, decline disputes on equal terms, and either
misrepresent their tenets, as appears manifestly in their doctrines of
justification and merit, satisfaction and indulgences; or else play the buffoons,
joking, scoffing, and relating stories, which, if true, would not touch
religion."—A Remonstrance, by way of Address, &c.

Note XXVI.

No Holland emblem could that malice mend.—P. 231.

Emblems, like puns, being the wit of a heavy people, the Dutch seem to have
been remarkable for them; of which, their old-fashioned prints, and figured
pan-tiles, are existing evidence. Prior thus drolls upon the passage in the text:
"Bayes. Oh! dear Sir, you are mighty obliging: but I must needs say at a
fable, or an emblem, I think no man comes near me; indeed I have studied it
more than any man. Did you ever take notice, Mr Johnson, of a little thing
that has taken mightily about town, a cat with a top-knot?[278]
 John. Faith, Sir, 'tis mighty pretty; I saw it at the coffee-house.
Bayes. 'Tis a trifle hardly worth owning. I was t'other day at Will's, throwing
out something of that nature; and, i'gad, the hint was taken, and out came
that picture; indeed the poor fellow was so civil to present me with a dozen of
'em for my friends. I think I have one here in my pocket; would you please to
accept it, Mr Johnson?
John. Really 'tis very ingenious.
Bayes. Oh, Lord, nothing at all! I could design twenty of 'em in an hour, if I
had but witty fellows about me to draw 'em. I was proffered a pension to go
into Holland and contrive their emblems; but, hang 'em, they are dull rogues,
and would spoil my invention."—Hind and Panther Transprosed.

Note XXVII.

The noble Buzzard ever pleased me best.—P. 233.

Gilbert Burnet, well known as an historian, was born of a good family in

Scotland, in 1643. He went through his studies with success; and, being
ordained by the Bishop of Edinburgh, obtained the living of Salton, in East
Lothian, in 1665. While in this living, he drew up a memorial of the abuses of
the Scotch bishops, and was instrumental in procuring the induction of
Presbyterian divines into vacant churches; a step which he afterwards
condemned as imprudent.[279] To measures so unfavourable for Episcopacy,
Dryden seems to allude, in these lines:

I know he hates the Pigeon-house and Farm,

And more, in time of war, has done us harm;
But all his hate on trivial points depends,
Give up our forms, and we shall soon be friends.

Burnet's opinion, or rather indifference, concerning forms, may be guessed at,

from the applause with which he quotes a saying of Dr Henry More; "None of
them are bad enough to make men bad, and I am sure none of them are
good enough to make men good." He was next created professor of divinity at
Glasgow; but as his active temper led him to mingle much in political life, he
speedily distinguished himself rather as a politician than a theologian. In 1672
he was made one of the king's chaplains, and was in high favour both with
Charles and his brother. He enjoyed much of the countenance of the Duke of
Lauderdale; but a quarrel taking place between them, the duke represented
Burnet's conduct in such terms, that he was deprived of his chaplainry, and
forced to resign his professor's chair, and abandon Scotland. He had an
opportunity of revenging himself upon Lauderdale, as will be noticed in a
subsequent note. During the time of the Popish plot, he again received a
portion of the royal countenance. He was then preacher at the Rolls Chapel,
under the patronage of Sir Harbottle Grimstone, master of the rolls, as also
lecturer at St Clement's, and enjoyed a high degree of public consideration.
Having, as he conceived, a fit opportunity to awaken the conscience of
Charles, he ventured upon sending him a letter, where he treated his personal
vices, and the faults of his government, with great severity,[280] and by which
he forfeited his favour for ever. This freedom, with his low-church tenets, gave
also offence to the Duke of York, who was, moreover, offended with him for
some interference in the affair of the Exclusion, in which, if he did not go all
the length of Shaftesbury, he recommended the appointment of a prince-
regent; a measure scarcely more palatable to the successor. At length, his
regard for Lord Russell, and the share which he took in penning, or
circulating, his dying declaration, drew upon him the full resentment of both
brothers. To this, a whimsical accident, in the choice of a text for the day of
the gun-powder plot, happened to contribute. The preacher chanced (for we
must believe what he assures us, ex verbo sacerdotis) to pitch on these
words: "Save me from the lion's mouth; thou hast delivered me from the
horns of the unicorn." This was interpreted as referring to the supporters of
the royal arms; and Burnet was discharged, by the king's command, both
from lecturing at St Clement's, and preaching at the Rolls Chapel. After this
final breach with the court he went abroad, and, having travelled through
France and Italy, settled in Holland at the court of the Prince of Orange. Here
he did not fail, with that ready insinuation which seems to have distinguished
him, to make himself of consequence to the prince, and especially to the
princess, afterwards Queen Mary. From this place of refuge he sent forth
several papers, in single sheets, relating to the controversy in England; and
the clergy, who had formerly looked upon him with some suspicion, began
now to treat with great attention and respect a person so capable of serving
their cause. He was consulted upon every emergency; which confidence was
no doubt owing partly to his situation near the person of the Prince of
Orange, the Protestant heir of the crown. He stood forward as the champion
of the church of England, in the controversy with Parker concerning the Test.
[281] In the "History of his Own Times," the bishop talks with complacency of
the sway which circumstances had given him among the clergy, and of the
important matters which fell under his management; for, by express command
of the Prince of Orange, he was admitted into all the secrets of the English
intrigues. These insinuations of Burnet's importance, although they afterwards
drew the ridicule of Pope, and the Tory wits of Queen Anne's reign, may, from
the very satire of Dryden, be proved to have been well founded. This acquired
importance of Burnet is the alliance between the Pigeon-house and Buzzard,
which Dryden reprobates, believing, or wishing to make others believe, that
Burnet held opinions unfavourable to Episcopacy. James considered this divine
as so formidable an enemy, that he wrote two very severe letters to his
daughter against him, and proceeded so far as to insist that he should be
forbidden the court; a circumstance which did not prevent his privately
receiving a double degree of countenance. A prosecution for high treason was
next commenced against Burnet, and a demand was made that he should be
delivered up; which the States evaded, by declaring that he was naturalized,
by marrying a Dutch lady. The court of England were then supposed to have
formed some plan, as they had attempted in the case of Peyton, of seizing, or
perhaps assassinating him, and a reward of L. 3000 was offered for the
service. Burnet, however, confident in the protection of the prince and states
of Holland, answered, replied, and retorted, and carried on almost an
immediate controversy with his sovereign, dated from the court of his son-in-
law. This active politician had a very important share in the Revolution, and
reaped his reward, by being advanced to the see of Salisbury. He died on the
17th of March, 1714-15.
His writings, theological, political, and polemical, are very numerous; but he is
most remarkable as an historian. The "History of the Reformation," but more
especially that of "His Own Times," raises him to a high rank among our
English historians.

Note XXVIII.

A portly prince, and goodly to the sight,

He seemed a son of Anach for his height;
Like those whom stature did to crowns prefer,
Black-browed, and bluff, like Homer's Jupiter;
Broad-backed, and brawny built, for love's delight,
A prophet formed to make a female proselyte.—P. 234.

The following song, which is preserved in the "State Poems," gives a similar
account of Burnet's personal appearance:
 A new Ballad, called, The Brawny Bishop's Complaint.
To the Tune of—Packington's Pound.

I.

When B——t perceived the beautiful dames,

Who flocked to the chapel of hilly St James,
On their lovers the kindest looks did bestow,
And smiled not on him while he bellowed below;
To the princess he went,
With pious intent,
This dangerous ill in the church to prevent:
O, Madam! quoth he, our religion is lost,
If the ladies thus ogle the knights of the toast.

II.

Your highness observes how I labour and sweat,

Their affections to raise, and new flames to beget;
And sure when I preach, all the world will agree,
That their ears and their eyes should be pointed on me:
But now I can't find,
One beauty so kind,
As my parts to regard, or my presence to mind;
Nay, I scarce have a sight of any one face,
But those of old Oxford, and ugly Arglas.

III.
These sorrowful matrons, with hearts full of truth,
Repent for the manifold sins of their youth;
The rest with their tattle my harmony spoil;
And Bur—ton, An—say, K—gston, and B—le,
Their minds entertain,
With thoughts so profane,
'Tis a-mercy to find that at church they contain;
Even Hen—ham's shapes their weak fancies entice,
And rather than me they will ogle the Vice.[282]

IV.

These practices, madam, my preaching disgrace;

Shall laymen enjoy the just rights of my place?
Then all may lament my condition for hard,
To thresh in the pulpit without a reward.
Then pray condescend,
Such disorders to end,
And from the ripe vineyards such labourers send;
Or build up the seats, that the beauties may see
The face of no brawny pretender but me.

V.

The princess, by rude importunities pressed,

Though she laughed at his reasons, allowed his request;
And now Britain's nymphs, in Protestant reign,
Are locked up at prayers like the virgins in Spain;
And all are undone,
As sure as a gun,
Whenever a woman is kept like a nun,
If any kind man from bondage will save her,
The lass, in gratitude, grants him the favour.

The jest of his being "a prophet, formed to make a female proselyte," was
more cutting, as he had just acquired a right of naturalization in Holland, by
marrying Mrs Mary Scott, a Dutch lady, but of Scottish extraction, being
descended of the noble house of Buccleuch.

Note XXIX.

The hero and the tyrant change their style,

By the same measure that they frown or smile.—P. 235.

It must be owned, that, with all Bishop Burnet's good qualities, there are
particulars in his history which give colour for this accusation. His opinions
were often hastily adopted, and of course sometimes awkwardly retracted,
and his patrons were frequently changed. Thus, he vindicated the legality of
divorce for barrenness on the part of the wife, and even that of polygamy, in
his resolution of two important cases of conscience. These were intended to
pave the way for Charles divorcing his barren wife Catherine, or marrying
another; and so raising a family of his own to succeed him, instead of the
Duke of York. These opinions he formally retracted. Notwithstanding his zeal
for liberty, his first work is said by Swift to have been written in defense of
arbitrary power. Above all, his great intimacy with the Dukes of Hamilton and
Lauderdale, the King and the Duke of York, the Pope and the Prince of
Orange; in short, his having the address to attach himself for a time to almost
every leading character, whom he had an opportunity of approaching, gives us
room to suspect, that if Burnet did not change his opinions, he had at least
the art of disguising such as could not be accommodated to those of his
immediate patron. When the king demanded that Burnet should be delivered
up by the States, he threatened, in return, to justify himself, by giving an
account of the share he had in affairs for twenty years past; in which he
intimated, he might be driven to mention some particulars, which would
displease the king. This threat, as he had enjoyed a considerable share of his
confidence when Duke of York, may seem, in some degree, to justify Dryden's
heavy charge against him, of availing himself of past confidence to criminate
former patrons. It is remarkable, also, that even while he was in the secret of
all the intrigues of the Revolution, and must have considered it as a near
attempt, he continued to assert the doctrine of passive obedience; and in his
letter to Middleton, in vindication of his conduct against the charge of high
treason, there is an affectation of excessive loyalty to the reigning monarch.
Against these instances of dissimulation, forced upon him perhaps by
circumstances, but still unworthy and degrading, we may oppose many
others, in which, when his principles and interest were placed at issue, he
refused to serve the latter at the expence of the former.

Note XXX.

His praise of foes is venomously nice;

So touched, it turns a virtue to a vice.—P. 235.

This applies to the sketches of characters introduced by Burnet in his

controversial tracts. But long after the period when Dryden wrote, the
publication of the History of his Own Times confirmed, to a certain extent, the
censure here imposed. It is a general and just objection to the bishop's
historical characters, that they are drawn up with too much severity, and that
the keenness of party has induced him, in many cases, to impose upon the
reader a caricature for a resemblance. Yet there appears to have been perfect
good faith upon his own part; so that we may safely acquit him of any
intention to exaggerate the faults, or conceal the virtues, of his political
enemies. He seems himself to have been conscious of a disposition to look
upon the dark side of humanity. "I find," says he, "that the long experience I
have had of the baseness, the malice, and the falsehood of mankind, has
inclined me to be apt to think generally the worst of men, and of parties."
Burnet therefore candidly puts the reader upon his guard against this
predominant foible, and expressly warns him to receive what he advances
with some grains of allowance.
But whatever was Burnet's private opinion of the conduct of others, and
however much he might be misled by prejudice in drawing their characters, it
should not be forgotten, that, in the moments of triumph which succeeded
the Revolution, he not only resisted every temptation to revenge for personal
injuries, but employed all his influence to recommend mild and conciliating
conduct to the successful party. Some, who had suffered under the severity of
James's reign, were extremely indignant at what seemed to them to argue too
much feeling for their discomfited adversaries, and too little sympathy with
their own past distresses. Samuel Johnson, in particular, reprobates the
Scottish bishop's exhortations to forgiveness and forgetfulness of injuries.
"And, besides, we have Scotch doctors, to teach us the art of forgetfulness.
Pray you have gude memories, gude memories; do not remember bad things,
(meaning the murders and oppressions of the last reigns,) but keep your
memories for gude things, have gude memories." To this mimicry of the
bishop's dialect, in which, however, he seems to have conveyed most
wholesome and sound council, Johnson adds, that, during the sitting of King
William's first parliament, while his complaints were before them, the bishop
sent to him his advice, "Not to name persons." "I gave, says he, an English
reply to that message; 'Let him mind his business, I will mind mine.' His
bookseller, Mr Chiswell, by whom I had the message, seemed loth to carry
him that blunt answer. Oh! said I, he has got the title of a Lord lately, I must
qualify my answer: 'Let him please to mind his own business, I will mind
mine."—This was very natural for one smarting under sufferings, who
complains, that "while a certain traveller," meaning Burnet, "was making his
court to the cardinals at Rome, he got such an almanack in his bones, (from
scourging,) as to incapacitate him from learning this Scotch trick of a gude
memory."[283] But it is the very character of moderate councils to be
disgusting to those who have been hurried beyond their patience by
oppression; and Johnson's testimony, though given with a contrary view, is
highly honourable to the bishop's prudence.

Note XXXI.

But he, uncalled, his patron to controul,

Divulged the secret whispers of his soul;
Stood forth the accusing Satan of his crimes,
And offered to the Moloch of the times.—P. 235.

In 1675, the House of Commons being resolved to assail the Duke of

Lauderdale, and knowing that Burnet, in whom he had once reposed much
confidence, could bear witness to some dangerous designs and expressions,
appointed the doctor to attend and be examined. His own account of this
delicate transaction is as follows:
"In April 1675, a session of parliament was held, as preparatory to one that
was designed next winter, in which money was to be asked; but none was
now asked, it being only called to heal all breaches, and to beget a good
understanding between the king and his people. The House of Commons fell
upon Duke Lauderdale; and those who knew what had passed between him
and me, moved, that I should be examined before a committee. I was
brought before them. I told them how I had been commanded out of town;
but though that was illegal, yet since it had been let fall, it was not insisted
on. I was next examined concerning his design of arming the Irish Papists. I
said, I, as well as others, had heard him say, he wished the Presbyterians in
Scotland would rebel, that he might bring over the Irish Papists to cut their
throats. I was next examined concerning the design of bringing a Scottish
army into England. I desired to be excused, as to what had passed in private
discourse; to which I thought I was not bound to answer, unless it were high
treason. They pressed me long, and I would give them no other answer; so
they all concluded, that I knew great matters; and reported this specially to
the House. Upon that I was sent for, and brought before the House. I stood
upon it as I had done at the committee, that I was not bound to answer; that
nothing had passed that was high treason; and as to all other things, I did not
think myself bound to discover them. I said farther, I knew the Duke
Lauderdale was apt to say things in a heat, which he did not intend to do;
and, since he had used myself so ill, I thought myself the more obliged not to
say any thing that looked like revenge, for what I had met with from him. I
was brought four times to the bar; at last I was told, the House thought they
had a right to examine into every thing that concerned the safety of the
nation, as well as into matters of treason; and they looked on me as bound to
satisfy them, otherwise they would make me feel the weight of their heavy
displeasure, as one that concealed what they thought was necessary to be
known. Upon this I yielded, and gave an account of the discourse formerly
mentioned. They laid great weight on this, and renewed their address against
Duke Lauderdale.
"I was much blamed for what I had done. Some, to make it look the worse,
added, that I had been his chaplain, which was false; and that I had been
much obliged to him, though I had never received any real obligation from
him, but had done him great services, for which I had been very unworthily
requited: Yet the thing had an ill appearance, as the disclosing of what had
passed in confidence; though I make it a great question, how far even that
ought to bind a man when the designs are very wicked, and the person
continued still in the same post and capacity of executing them. I have told
the matter as it was, and must leave myself to the censure of the reader. My
love to my country, and my private friendship, carried me, perhaps, too far;
especially since I had declared much against clergymen's meddling in secular
affairs, and yet had run myself so deep in them."—History of his Own Times,
Vol. I. p. 375.
The discourse to which Burnet refers was of the following dangerous
tendency, and took place in September 1673.
"Duke. If the king should need an army from Scotland, to tame those in
England, might the Scots be depended upon?
 "Burnet. Certainly not. The commons in the southern parts are all
Presbyterians. The nobility thought they had been ill used, were generally
discontented, and only waited for an opportunity to show it.
"Duke. I am of another mind. The hope of the spoil of England will bring
them all in.
"Burnet. The king is ruined if he trusts to that; for even indifferent persons,
who might otherwise have been ready enough to push their fortunes without
any anxious enquiries into the grounds they went upon, will not now trust the
king, since he has so lately said, he would stick to his declaration,[284] and yet
has so soon given it up.
"Duke. Hinc illæ lacrymæ. The king was forsaken in that matter, and none
sticks to him but Lord Clifford and myself."—Ralph, with the Authorities he
quotes, Vol. I. p. 275.
James II. afterwards revived the plan of maintaining a Scottish standing army,
to bridle his English subjects.

Note XXXII.

And runs an Indian muck at all he meets.—P. 235.

To run a-muck, is a phrase derived from a practice of the Malays. When one
of this nation has lost his whole substance by gaming, or sustained any other
great and insupportable calamity, he intoxicates himself with opium; and,
having dishevelled his hair, rushes into the streets, crying Amocca, or Kill, and
stabbing every one whom he meets with his creeze, until he is cut down, or
shot, like a mad dog.

Note XXXIII.

Such was, and is, the Captain of the Test.—P. 236.

Burnet may have been thus denominated, from having written the following
pamphlets, in the controversy respecting the Test, against Parker, the
apostate bishop of Oxford:
"An Enquiry into the Reasons for Abrogating the Test imposed on all Members
of Parliament, offered by Dr Samuel Parker, Bishop of Oxford."
"A Second Part of the Enquiry into the Reasons offered by Doctor Samuel
Parker, bishop of Oxford, for Abrogating the Test; or an Answer to his plea for
Transubstantiation, and for Acquitting the Church of Rome of Idolatry."
"A Continuation of the Second Part of the Enquiry into the Reasons offered by
Dr Samuel Parker, Bishop of Oxford, for Abrogating the Test relating to the
Idolatry of the Church of Rome."
These two last pamphlets were afterwards thrown together in one tract,
entitled, "A Discourse concerning Transubstantiation and Idolatry, being an
Answer to the Bishop of Oxford's plea relating to these two points."
Burnet himself admits, that his papers, in this controversy with Parker, were
written with an acrimony of style which nothing but such a time and such a
man could excuse. His papers were so bitter, that nobody durst offer them to
the bishop of Oxford, till the king himself sent them to him, in hopes to
stimulate him to an answer.
Several of these pieces seem to have been published after "The Hind and the
Panther;" but it must have been generally known at the time, that Burnet had
placed himself in the front of this controversy.

And much the Buzzard in their cause did stir,

Though naming not the patron, to infer,
With all respect, he was a gross idolater.

The passage particularly referred to in these lines occurs in a tract, entitled,

"Reasons against repealing the Act of Parliament, concerning the Test," which
is the first of six papers published by Dr Burnet when in Holland, and
reprinted at London in 1689. His words are these:
"IX. I am told some think it very indecent to have a test for our parliaments,
in which the king's religion is accused of idolatry; but if this reason is good in
this particular, it will be full as good against several of the articles of our
church, and many of the homilies. If the church and religion of this nation is
so formed by law, that the king's religion is declared over and over again to
be idolatrous, what help is there for it? It is no other than it was when his
majesty was crowned, and swore to maintain our laws.
"I hope none will be wanting in all possible respect to his sacred person; and
as we ought to be infinitely sorry to find him engaged in a religion which we
must believe idolatrous, so we are far from the ill manners of reflecting on his
person, or calling him an idolater: for as every man that reports a lie, is not