Page 1

1
2
3 Attorney-General Michelle Rowland 1-6-2025 Email
4 [email protected],
5
6 Cc: Service Australian CUSTOMER.COMMENTS <[email protected]>
7 Centrelink Ref 301 602 799V Reply Paid 7800, CANBERRA BC ACT 2610
8
Minister for Health and Ageing The Hon Mark Butler MP
Minister for Disability and the National Disability Insurance Scheme The Hon Mark Butler MP
(Deputy Leader of the House)
Minister for the National Disability Insurance Scheme Senator the Hon Jenny McAllister
Minister for Aged Care and Seniors The Hon Sam Rae MP
9
10 ROBODEBT 3
11 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
12 Re 20250601-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Attorney-General Michelle Rowland
13 -regarding THE THEFT OF AGE PENSION & RIGHTS, ETC, part 15
14 Michelle,
15 I rely upon my previous correspondences to the office of the Attorney-General as well to
16 other government entities, including those published at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati.
17
18 While the numskulls have been acting to so to say get back upon me for daring to expose the
19 TREASON, TERRORISM, etc by suspending my Age Pension payments, let it be clear it will not
20 stop me to expose matters further, as some set out below!
21
22 When on desires to bring down a structure, one can start at the top and slowly work down or one can
23 simply destroy the very basis of the structure and the rest comes down immediately. This in fact
24 proved to be how the September 11 (9/11) building were destroyed, at least as the videos proved it
25 was done.
26
27 In Australia we have our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) which is a
28 “political union” by the former Colonies now “States” and politician and others who are in power
29 generally are interested in what they can achieve for themselves rather than to consider what their
30 duties and obligations are about. Slowly they corrupt the system that few may be aware how corrupt
31 the system has become as after all most people grow up within the corrupt system and as such
32 unlikely will ever become aware they are doing so in a corrupt system. I however wasn’t born
33 within the corrupt system and well more and more realized that what the true meaning and
34 application of the legal principles embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
35 1900 (UK is ongoing violated.
36

1-6-2025 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 When the Framers of the Constitution were debating what constitutional structure a future
2 constitution was to be to be presented to the people of the Colonies, they embedded in it that the
3 Governor-General had to be a person who was selected by the Home Office to the Monarch to be
4 the Monarchs representatives (CEO) of the newly to be formed “political union” the
5 Commonwealth of Australia. They did however consider that in time a person born in the
6 Commonwealth of Australia, being a Subject of the Monarch, could be instead elected by the
7 People. Meaning that the are only 2 valid ways to have a Governor-General that is either nominated
8 by the Home Office to the Monarch or having been elected by the Australians themselves.
9 However, Isaacs Isaacs (himself one of the Framers of the Constitution) somehow managed to
10 railroad the system by PURPORTEDLY becoming Governor-General in about 1930. Thereafter
11 others were PURPORTEDLY nominated by the Australian so called prime Minister and hence none
12 were validly representing the Monarch. We had the absurdity that when Prince Charles became King
13 Charles I understand the PURPORTED Governor-General then invited King Charles to be King of
14 Australia! So, the servant somehow appoints the master?
15 And, as I understand it, we had this numskull of a PURPORTED prime Minister then deciding one
16 of his staff members should be Governor-General even so in my view she is a numskull who seems
17 to lack the competence a Governor-General ought to have.
18 Many will claim that Anthony Albanese was voted for and elected as prime Minister in the 2022
19 federal general election, however, in my view he never was entitled to be then a candidate in this
20 political candidate in the first place where he was in violation of S44 of the constitution. Meaning
21 that any commission as prime Minister would have expired, at least by Section 64 after 3 months.
22 Here we have a PURPORTED Governor-General who was so much up to herself against the British
23 falsely claiming that the British invaded Australia that in itself may underline how brainwashed she
24 was to claim this. Ewe have for long been subjected to that Australia Day 26 January is an
25 “INVASION DAY” and this also underlines how were have the zombies running around braindead
26 to reality.
27 Let us also consider this gross absurdity! Here we had PURPORTED Governor-Generals who had
28 served in the Australian Defense Force and were therefore entitled to their pensions besides being
29 contracted and paid as a Governor-General. The Constitution does require that the payment is to be
30 made to the Monarch as the Governor-General technically is in the employment of the British
31 Monarch. And when the Governor-General leaves the Commonwealth of Australia then he/she must
32 pay the person then being acting Governor-General! Well, that neither seems to happen.
33 As I understood it the Official Secretary (to the Governor-General) (on video) stated (May 2022)
34 that there was an “interim” Government. Our constitution doesn’t permit any “interim”
35 government. The Governor-General is constitutionally the Head of the Government and by right
36 should preside over Cabinet meetings. We often hear about “Cabinet” made certain policy decisions,
37 but let’s have a look at this Cabinet itself, contrary to the falsehood claims by Ministers, does not
38 have any constitutional powers to make decisions regarding any Department for which a Minister
39 has been commissioned as “responsible Minister”.
40 When one watch the video of the swearing in of Anthony Albanese then it relates to the Office of
41 the prime Minister and not at all to the Office of the “prime Minister and Cabinet”. No minister can
42 assume powers regarding any Department/Cabinet without having been formally sworn in for the
43 particular portfolio.
44 While constitutionally we have a “Governor-General’s government” this because the Governor-
45 General ultimately is in charge we nevertheless have been flooded with claims about a “labor
46 Government”, “Coalition Government” etc. Constitutionally Australian electors cannot vote for who
47 shall be in government, as Ministers are, well supposed to be, “constitutional advisors” but in my
48 view in reality are numskulls who lack any proper understanding as to the true meaning and
1-6-2025 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 application of the legal principles embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
2 1900 (UK).
3 Then in 2001 there never was a valid general election and so those purportedly elected never were.
4 This I proved on 19 July 2006 in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka (representing myself) in both unchallenged
5 appeals. Meaning that John Howard while commissioned as prime minister no longer was after 3
6 months (Section 64 of the constitution) and by this for this was in my view simply an imposter
7 pretending to be a Commonwealth official and receiving payments not entitled upon, and so other
8 so-called Ministers. Moreover because of what I consider TREASON to unconstitutionally authorize
9 the invasion of Australian Troops into Afghanistan and subsequently into Iraq he for this also could
10 not be or remain to be a Member of Parliament as others in cahoots with him neither were so.
11 Hence, he neither was in my view therefore validly seeking the 2004 general election.
12
13 Something that also seems to be misunderstood is that AFTER an election (General-
14 election/DOUBLE DISSOLUTION) the Governor-General has to swear in all Members who are to
15 become or remain to be Ministers. As I understood it from a video Anthony Albanese (if he was
16 validly commissioned in 2022 that is) didn’t have to be re-sworn as prime minister because a person
17 who has been commissioned for a particular portfolio remains to be so regardless of any results of
18 any election (General-election/DOUBLE DISSOLUTION) and only those who are allocated a (new)
19 portfolio are to be sworn in. if therefore a person is serving say as Foreign Minister (Minister for
20 Foreign Affairs then regardless of any election outcome this person remains to be the Foreign
21 Minister unless and until the Governor-General commissioned another person as Foreign Minister).
22 Hence, even if there is a change of Government Ministers after an election those who were already
23 Ministers prior to the election will remain so until the Governor-General replace such a person with
24 swearing in another person as a Minister, regardless of a persons’ political associations. Moreover,
25 the validity of any Ministerial appointment doesn’t become law unless and until if ever at all the
26 Governor-General publish in the Gazette the name of the relevant person commissioned for any
27 portfolio. As such, as with the alleged appointments of Scott Morrison to various portfolios that
28 were never published in the Gazette they were and remain non valid appointments!
29 The Governor-General for example could commission me to be the prime Minister, even so I was
30 not a successful candidate and neither a Member of Parliament, albeit restricted by the provisions of
31 Section 64 of the constitution.
32
33 In my view if we had a competent federal Attorney-General than she would have ensured that those
34 who acted in violation of my constitutional rights to receive the Age Pension payments would be
35 severely dealt with. It seems to me we are dealing with an incompetent Attorney-General! It seems
36 to me that she couldn’t care less that the Age Pension payments were for me to purchase food,
37 medication, pay towards medical expenses and other bills and as such I view is totally heartless and
38 not of the kind of person one should have as an Attorney General.
39
40 “John Howard’s masterful blunder”. https://insidestory.org.au/john-howards-masterful-blunder/
41 QUOTE by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka 31-5-2025
42 Regretfully the High Court of Australia of Australia in my view were in on allowing John
43 Howard to go to war in March 2003 this even so I provided the Court with details that such
44 invasion involving Australian troops was TREASON! My Application to prevent the invasion
45 into Iraq on 18 February 2003 was denied by the Registrar (not being an OFFICER OF THE
46 COURT mind you) and my appeal was denied the next day on 19 February 2003. The
47 Registrar then suggested for me to amend my application and I followed his directions and
48 then lodged the application on 18 March 2003 upon which the Registrar again denied it for
1-6-2025 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 filing. I appealed that decision (being a review of the Registrars decision) and a judge then
2 made clear on 19 March 2003 (the day of the invasion) to dismiss my appeal/request regarding
3 the filing of the 18 February 2003 application. Meaning, the 18 March 2003 application
4 remains alive to this day, this as the judge referred to the 18 February 2003 Application and
5 not the 18 March 2003 Application.
6 Not deterred in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka appeals (I represented myself) on 19 July 2006, I
7 raised the constitutional issues again regarding John Howard unconstitutional invasion into
8 Iraq and proved to the Court that the 2001 Federal general election actually was not legally
9 valid at all and so neither the 2004 purported federal general election. I had already in 2002
10 filed a NOTICE OF CONSTOITUTIONAL MATTER which also then was served upon all
11 9 Attorney Generals. I also served each of them with a 409 pages “written submission” named
12 ADDRESS TO THE COURT containing set out of my numerous constitutional challenges
13 also. Neither the DPP and/or any or all of the Attorney Generals challenged any of my written
14 material that was before the Court and both appeals were upheld. Legally by this they all by
15 implication conceded what I had placed before the court! Parts of this case regarding the
16 invasion into Afghanistan and Iraq can be also read in the following document:
17
18 The unconstitutional injustice against David McBride, The gross incompetence of the
19 Attorney General, the unconstitutional covid scam, the unconstitutional suspension of
20 the Age Pension and a lot more!
21 https://www.scribd.com/document/869707647/20250531-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-
22 Attorney-General-Michelle-Rowland-regarding-the-THEFT-of-AGE-PENSION-RIGHTS-
23 ETC-Part-14
24
25 In August 2005 I then also defeated the Commonwealth DPP that the Commonwealth couldn’t
26 rely upon “AVERMENT” as it violated legal principles embedded in the constitution.
27 (Meaning the ATO and/or any other Commonwealth entity neither can rely upon using
28 “AVERMENT”!)
29 The ADDRESS TO THE COURT County Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 &
30 Q1089763 set out parts of the appeals regarding the invasion into Afghanistan and/or Iraq
31 being unconstitutional. In my view the David McBride case was a miscarriage of justice
32 because effectively it was not just exposing murder but unbeknown to him that the invasion
33 was unconstitutional.
34 My now Late wife Olga Hlavka-Schorel and myself were terrorised and even now I had my
35 Age Pension Payments stopped which consider other criminal conduct appears to me to be a
36 conspiracy to pay me back for exposing the rot. Details also exposing the covid-19 scam, etc,
37 are published at my blog https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati. Regrettably the article
38 appears to me to fail to include what I refer to above in its presentation “John Howard’s
39 masterful blunder”. https://insidestory.org.au/john-howards-masterful-blunder/
40 END QUOTE by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka 31-5-2025
41
42 Yes, we had a PURPORTED Governor-General who failed to immediately take appropriate action
43 against those Minister which were acting in violation of the constitution to invade a “friendly”
44 country! And now we had the similar regarding Ukraine where we got as I view it numskull prime
45 Minister’s who had no constitutional authority and yet became involved in a conflict and even
46 supporting one side with weapons, monies, etc, without any Governor-General’s lawful approval as
47 to my understanding no DECLARATION OF WAR was published in the Gazette naming each

1-6-2025 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1 particular country. Meaning we in my view have a dud (PURPORTED) Governor-General who

2 lacks the ability and competence to perform properly as a Governor-General!
3
4 As for any person to be commissioned as “constitutional advisors” I view they are “charlatans”
5 who lack the competence and ability to be proper “constitutional advisers”. After all, if a person
6 goes to a “taxation adviser” you would and could expect the person to have competence in taxation
7 matters and not that this person pretends to be a “taxation adviser” but then needs to consult others
8 how to do the job.
9
10 Something that appeared to be very obvious was that the allocations of portfolios was based upon
11 political factions within the Australian Labor Party as has been in the Coalition, rather than that we
12 have a Governor-General who commission competent persons to certain portfolios for the sake of
13 ALL Australians and not for a particular political party doctrine. After all Members of Parliament
14 are entitled to argue their political causes in the Parliament when acting as law makers however
15 when acting as a Minister, they must be politically neutral as to be able to serve all Australians
16 and not just their political base.
17 Our constitution limits Section 51 legislative powers for the “peace, order and good government”
18 and it seems to me the numskulls in the Government simply haven’t got a clue what that means and
19 neither act accordingly.
20 We in my view have ended up with a highly paid PURPORTED Governor-General which is grossly
21 incompetent to even do the job being paid for.
22
23 Again, refusing a REVIEW of the Age Pension payments suspension may underline the gross
24 incompetence in it all! Keep in mind when finally legal accountability does come around than you
25 may discover KARMA!

26
27
28 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
29
30 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
31 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

32 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

33 (Our name is our motto!)

1-6-2025 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati