Jamieson MarketingAndrogynyEvolution 2007
Jamieson MarketingAndrogynyEvolution 2007
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Popular Music
Abstract
The trend in popular culture away from idealising mature, strong 'men' in favour of young,
androgynous 'boys' can in part be traced to how pop music impresarios such as Lou Pearlma
present sexuality to their huge market of young listeners. During their time under th
management of Wright Stuff, 1996-1998, the Backstreet Boys were the most popular manufac
tured boyband in the world, and as such influenced the sexual development of millions of youn
women and men. This paper examines how, during this period, the presentation and marketin
of the Backstreet Boys, and their youngest member Nick Carter in particular, encouraged quee
readings, and how those subtle queer subtexts in the music and videos may have affected the
(mostly) young, uncritical audience.
Introduction
In five years of active clubbing in gay clubs across Canada and Western Europe
noticed that a common feature of all of them is that you can find straight wo
dancing with the men, ogling the men, and sometimes attempting to pick up so
the men. In talking to these women (some of whom I count among my closest fri
I've discovered that they fantasise about gay men, in part, because it is a safe w
have fun: no matter what happens on the dance floor, they'll end up going hom
their friends because the men are generally not sexually interested in them. But
of these young women are seriously attracted to these men; the stereotypical
gay male body, a staple of homosexual male desire since at least ancient Greece
over the past few decades, become a new standard for masculine beauty in
straight and gay culture. This relatively new type of male sex symbol is sensitiv
afraid to express emotions), soft-skinned, usually blonde, thin (if not emaciate
youthful (which implies a lack of body and facial hair, boundless energy, as wel
certain coy naivete), fashionable and possesses an above-average ability to danc
is, in a word, androgynous, embodying in roughly equal proportions traits whic
traditionally perceived as masculine and feminine.
Most gay men are not androgynous; many androgynous men are not gay. W
is intriguing, however, is how this body type, embodied by celebrities like Leon
DiCaprio, David Beckham, and Orlando Bloom, has become the standard i
entertainment industry, overtaking the dominant type of male sex symbol of
previous half-century - men such as William Holden, Sean Connery and Humph
Bogart - strong, possibly hirsute, hyper-masculine types (Bordo 1999, p. 21). T
245
the reasons for this generational reversal in tastes among straight females are no doubt
many, varied and complex, I posit that pop music, if not the prime instigator of this
trend, has played a major role in perpetuating it, and introducing it to each new
generation of consumers. And one of the principal vehicles for this cultural shift is the
manufactured band.
It is beyond the scope of this paper to address gay culture or pop music in
general, or the role each plays when combined with the other. Though there are few
studies relating specifically to pop music's effects on adolescent sexual development,
general studies agree that mass media consumption does influence youths' attitudes
toward sexuality and expectations about sex (Ward 2003, p. 372; Roberts, Henriksen
and Foehr 2004, pp. 499-502). We can therefore assume that the producers of manu
factured bands do have some influence on the sexual tastes of the youngest members
of society. Continuing from that assumption, what this paper will address is the way
that these producers shape the music, videos and images of their pop stars to create
and perpetuate a market for androgynous (or gay-looking) men among their core
target audiences: young heterosexual girls and homosexual boys.
As a young queer man, I have a secondary, personal interest in this topic. How
did the music I listened to, and the music videos I watched, at the time I came out of the
closet affect my sexual tastes (not to mention the sexual tastes of the many straight
girls I met at gay clubs when I first started going to them)? Or, alternatively, how di
the management teams and creative forces behind pop groups like the Backstreet Boy
that were popular at that time market the music specifically to young gay men, to us
our sexual confusion to enrich themselves? This issue of specifically, and sublimi-
nally, aiming at a gay male audience while not offending the large homophobi
market that also existed in the United States (and still exists, though hopefully it is
diminishing) fascinates me, especially as it worked so well on me. I was a very serious
teenager, who listened only to art music and jazz until I began the process of coming
out; only then did I become interested in popular music at all. I imagine that this subtle
appeal to gay tastes in manufactured pop had much to do with this sudden change in
my musical preferences.
I will focus my examination on the Backstreet Boys, who were created in
Orlando, Florida by Louis Pearlman (who later created *NSync and O-Town) and
were managed, until December 1998, by Wright Stuff, who are Johnny and Donna
Wright (also the managers of New Edition and the New Kids on the Block). I have
chosen the Backstreet Boys partly because, at the time, they were the band I was mos
interested in. Their peak period of popularity, from 1996-2000, coincided with my
coming out. But, on a much more important, universal level, the Backstreet Boys ar
significant because they were the first North American boyband to aggressively
pursue the gay market. (That they were the first, of course, was partly political: only
since the mid-1990s has the political climate in the United States liberalised enough to
allow the so-called 'gay community' to emerge as a powerful economic force,
constituency large enough to be worth actively pursuing.)
Nick Carter, as the youngest, most androgynous member of the band, was the
Backstreet Boy who played the most sexually ambiguous role within the band. Since
he appealed to both of the main groups of fans that the Boys were courting (young
girls, due to his age, and gay men, due to his androgynous body-type), Wright Stuff
made him the front-man of the band, emphasising his youth, innocence and his sexua
ambiguity. They isolated and highlighted him in the Boys' videos, they gave him mor
solo lines in the singles, they even put him on the cover of a gay teen magazine. And
since managerial control over the image, sound and marketing of the Backstreet Boys
is my greatest interest, I will concentrate on the earliest years of the band's popularity,
1996-1998, as they were no longer represented by Wright Stuff, and Nick's special
queer function in the band became less marked, after that period.
It is important to remember that throughout these analyses I am essentialising
the binarisms gay/straight, masculine/feminine, queer/normal, etc. I do this not
because that is how I view the world, or because it is how I believe the world ought to
be viewed. I do it because marketing constitutes essentialism, though an essentialism
based on years of research. As the subjects of this paper are dealing with essentialism
in their marketing of a band and a singer, then so must I to understand them and to
analyse the products of their labours.
Donna Wright are certainly not - the semiotic codes which govern pop music icon-
ography are by now so deeply entrenched in homosexual desire that few producers
could now ignore the gay market, regardless of their personal tastes. Boybands with
pretty members are nothing new, especially in Europe, where the Backstreet Boys
had to first go to build up a reputation and experience before returning to the
United States. What makes the Backstreet Boys special is that they brought this
European formula to America, and thus became the biggest selling boyband in the
world up to that time. But they are also important because Pearlman and Wright Stuff
specifically marketed them towards the gay community, focusing attention on Nick,
his youth, and his androgynous body, rather than on the older and more classically
handsome Kevin Richardson, or Brian Littrell, who is arguably a better singer. By
extension, they also helped the youngest members of the female heterosexual
audience to develop a sexual taste for the androgynous body type of which Carter was
a prime example.
young audience, they must refrain from showing any specific rebelling. The Boys are
probably singing about sex (but possibly not), may well be standing around in a forest
because they're about to do something illicit (or maybe they just like the outdoors),
nice boys don't ride motorcycles (or do they?). The girls can be attracted to these
pseudo-rock stars, the parents can convince themselves with not too much trouble
that the song is all quite innocent.
The song bombed in the US, staying on the Top 40 for only two weeks before
disappearing. However, in continental Europe, where boybands were more common
and more popular, the song did fairly well. So for the next two years, the Backstreet
Boys abandoned their home country to concentrate on the rest of the world.
The next two singles to be released, 'I'll Never Break Your Heart' and 'Anywhere
For You', were both ballads, and, like 'We've Got It Goin' On', both had videos
directed by Lionel Martin. These first three videos share a certain style; they all focus
on the band members as a whole (as opposed to individual members of the band),
there are no discernible plotlines, a sport is featured in each one (basketball, skiing,
beach volleyball, respectively). And though these videos, along with the video for
their fourth single, the fast dance track 'Get Down (You're The One For Me)', are at
pains to present the Backstreet Boys as a single entity, with plenty of group shots, and
no single member yet presented as a front-man, a star, there are already small
indications that Nick is somehow different from the others. In certain scenes on the ski
slopes in 'I'll Never Break Your Heart', Nick is wearing a white turtleneck sweater,
while the other Boys are wearing red. Likewise, in the forest scenes in 'We've Got It
Goin' On', Nick is wearing a white baseball cap, while the other Boys are bareheaded.
In 'Anywhere For You', the Boys are strolling down a beach and playing volleyball,
and all of them except Nick have their shirts off (or at least open) at some point during
the video. Nick's unwillingness to show his chest (officially explained as his mother's
wish to keep him innocent until the age of eighteen) is taken to a ridiculous extreme in
the 'We've Got It Goin' On' video, where a scene of him playing basketball with Brian
has them both in singlets, but Nick has a T-shirt on under his. These all serve to draw
one's eye toward Nick, away from the other members of the band, to emphasise his
difference, and, crucially, his innocence. White being a colour traditionally associated
with purity, it is probably not an accident that it shows up in Nick's wardrobe more
frequently than in the other Boys'. And Nick hiding his body while the other four
flaunt theirs serves the same end more obviously.
In 'Get Down', a new director, Alan Calzatti, brings a new vision to the
Backstreet Boys' videos, eschewing the montage approach to focus on a single scene,
the inside of a disco ball, surrounded by video screens of dancing girls. But the focus
on the band stays; excepting the bizarre appearance of a floating rapper halfway, and
the spectral girls, only the Boys appear. Nick is again presented as slightly different,
this time by doing flips and otherwise displaying his agile body. If the Lionel Martin
videos presented Nick as the most innocent and youthful member of the Boys, this one
emphasises that he is also their best dancer and has the best 'moves' of all of them.
Back to America
first Backstreet Boys video to escape from boyband cliche, and the first one worthy of
a deep analysis.
The most obvious difference between this video and the four previous is that
only the Boys are in it - there are no women in the video, nor are any women
mentioned in the lyrics of the song. Nick's first solo shot is a fuzzy one (which could
be meant to imply fantasy or dreams) which quickly resolves to show him brooding,
with his head down and his blonde hair hanging sensually over his eyes. When he is
singing, Nick is usually shown alone, with the focus going in and out, his head thrown
back and his eyes closed. This is a clear semiotic evocation of sex - in Western culture,
through the indoctrination of Hollywood films, sexual pleasure is often implied by
shots like this one. In a very striking moment, Nick abandons the pseudo-sexual
ecstasy for two words, 'for you', where he looks straight at the camera, directly
addressing the viewer and even pointing at them. This accentuates what Simon Frith
has noted, that 'pop effects are usually explained in terms of identity - the key words
in most pop songs are "I" and "you'" (Frith 1988, p. 167). Though there has yet to be
any serious queer implications (other than the underlying homosocial sexual tension),
Nick is clearly being set apart as the object of desire in the band.
Approximately half way through the video, which takes place at night in a sort
of concrete-covered public park, it begins to rain, and the Boys, who hitherto had been
sitting on a step socialising with one another, decide that this would be a good time to
move to the basketball court. So the soaking wet Boys, now in various states of
undress (except for Nick, who remains fully clothed) proceed to congregate and dance
on the basketball court. Except, again, for Nick. Nick is never shown on the court; he
is always on the bleachers watching the other Boys, who never leave the court from
this point in the video. What is being enacted here, in an abstract way, is a 'fear of the
locker room' and 'fear of sports' scenario, of the type that keeps many gay boys from
participating in organised sport. Nick sits on the sidelines and watches the older,
mostly shirtless Boys 'play' basketball. Regardless of whether or not he has the ability
to play, he does not, because he is afraid of being looked down upon for being
perceived as gay, perception being everything in high school. No matter how good
Nick might be at basketball, he is young, thin, blonde, and androgynously pretty,
therefore he must sit and watch, not participate. Whether he is watching the 'game' or
the players is up to the viewers to decide - queer viewers will likely assume the latter,
and straight viewers, if they even consider the question, the former.
There are other things that add to the queerness of this second half of the video.
Nick's first solo shot after the rain begins is of him fixing his hair, an essentially 'gay'
thing to do. In some group shots, while the other four boys are dancing, Nick is sitting
down, looking at the asphalt, as if willing himself not to stare at the semi-naked wet
men in front of him. With the frequent shots of his hands moving near his face (a
gesture especially notable just before the final chorus), Nick seems to be visually
quoting Madonna's 'Vogue' choreography. This referencing of one of the biggest
subjects of gay diva worship of the 1990s is analogous to the men in the 1950s who
quoted Bette Davis and Judy Garland - it is a calling card designed to be noticed and
appreciated by gay men, and simply passed over as another dance-move by the
twelve-year-old girls who have likely never seen Madonna's 'Vogue' video, and, if
they have, probably do not understand the gay subtext behind it. The penultimate
shot of the video is Nick's alone, and once more he is pictured slightly out-of-focus, his
head thrown back, his eyes closed, but this time, with an intense, almost orgasmic
expression on his rain-dampened face.
It's hard, for me at least, not to view this video as anything other than a paean to
Nick Carter. But it is probable that someone not looking for them would miss all the
subtly queer moments, and so the video works perfectly from a marketing perspective
- gay viewers read it as queer, straight viewers read it as straight, and everyone reads
it as principally about Nick.
What is especially noteworthy about 'Quit Playin' Games' is that this is the song
and video Wright Stuff chose as the first American single after the Boys' two-year
Euro-Canadian hiatus. That they would choose this video, one with a strong queer
subtext, and one that so prominently features Nick, is indicative of their conscious
decision to court gay men, and market Nick as sexually ambiguous. Another strong
indicator of this is their decision to have photo sessions and interviews with not
just teen girl magazines like 16, but also the sole American gay teen magazine, xy.
Indeed, xy's October 1997 issue not only has an interview and fashion spread with
the Boys, but it has a picture of Nick on its cover. Once again, Nick is separated
from the other Boys, and this time, is specifically linked with a something unambigu-
ously gay.
Thus far I have concentrated almost exclusively on the Backstreet Boys' videos
music of the first album bears some comment before some more detailed anal
the music on album number two. It can be confusing, however, defining what
constitutes the first album. There are ten tracks on the Canadian version, thir
the UK version, fourteen on the Italian version and a massive fifteen on the J
one. Most of the tracks were written by songwriters from Stockholm's Cheiro
headed by Denniz PoP and Max Martin, and are very high quality Euro-pop (
also produced songs for Ace of Base, *NSync and Britney Spears, among many
What I mean when I say 'high quality Euro-pop' is not that the songs are part
original examples of the genre, but that the production value of the music is v
- the actual sound of the music is easy and pleasant to listen to, without any
distortion that is a feature of rock music production and pop music which w
to project a rock'n'roll sound image (to sound more 'authentic'). The songs con
familiar patterns harmonically, rhythmically and lyrically, and because of t
fast ones can be danced to on a first hearing, and you know when you're su
to feel the strongest emotions during the ballads via clear musical and
signposting.
The two dance tracks I have already discussed, 'We've Got It Goin' On' and 'Get
Down (You're The One For Me)', are nearly identical in structure. They have a slow
dance beat, a standard verse-chorus form, they both have a 'break' after the second
chorus where the beat drops out and the Boys are left to harmonise alone for a few bars
before the beat is brought back in for the final chorus (which is identical to the
previous choruses, but somehow seems more intense in contrast with the more
relaxed 'break' section). The three ballads are all traditional verse-chorus structures,
complete with final choruses a tone higher, just so they are that much more emotive.
The lyrics of the dance tracks are more explicitly sexual than the ballads, which tend to
deal with love, both requited and unrequited.
Throughout this album, there seems to be no special musical treatment of Nick.
It is likely that the decision to focus on Nick as the star of the band was made after this
first album was produced, especially, as we have seen, as it is not until the fifth video
('Quit Playin' Games') that he is most truly and obviously set apart from the rest of the
group. As we shall see, the music for the second Backstreet Boys album Backstreet's
Back will subtly shift towards this new view of the Boys: no longer a cohesive unit, but
five individuals, with Nick as the star.
In reality, working out which songs are on which album is a decidedly diff
A song that appears on the Italian edition of Backstreet Boys might appe
Canadian edition of Backstreet's Back, and not appear at all on any Amer
Further complicating this matter is the fact that the two-year hiatus
American charts meant that the American edition of Backstreet Boys wa
compilation of tracks from both of the first two albums released abroad, so
are (at the time of writing) only four Backstreet Boys albums available i
compared to the five available everywhere else. This discrepancy infects
videos; when 'I'll Never Break Your Heart' was released in America, two year
release elsewhere, the video was entirely reshot by a different direct
completely different concept.
The Canadian version of Backstreet's Back consists of twelve tracks, fo
the Cheiron studio, one by the legendary producer 'Mutt' Lange (A
Leppard, Shania Twain), and one credited to Brian Littrell. Though only w
third of the album, Martin and PoP's influence on the Backstreet Boys' sou
not be underestimated; the first two singles from the album were by them, an
the first five tracks on the album are theirs.
'Everybody (Backstreet's Back)' was the first single from the album, and, from
anecdotal evidence, seems to be the song that most people first think of when the
Backstreet Boys are mentioned. It certainly has the most memorable video. Set in a
haunted mansion, it is an extravagant paraphrase of Michael Jackson's classic
'Thriller' video, complete with the singers becoming monsters, an intro and outro
with the Boys acting, and an elaborate mass dance sequence at the climax. Though the
Boys themselves are credited with the general idea, the director who brought off this
camp gothic masterpiece was Joseph Kahn. The story (the fact that there is even a
vague narrative is unusual for a music video) is roughly as follows: the Boys' tour bus
breaks down, and their driver leaves them alone in the traditional horror-film aban-
doned castle. Upon falling asleep, all five participate in what they assume to be a
dream, where each of them is transformed into a 'monster' - Kevin becomes Dr
Jekyll/Mr Hyde, AJ becomes the Phantom of the Opera, Brian is a werewolf, Howie a
vampire, and Nick a mummy. In the final main sequence, the Boys (as themselves, not
as monsters) participate in a 'ball' in the castle, which in reality is just an excuse for
some mass dancing. The boys awake the next morning, discuss their dream, and then
are greeted by their bus driver (who now looks like a horror film evil butler cliche
himself), and the video ends with the Boys screaming in fear. Musically, the song
follows the identical structure of the previous two up-tempo singles - it is another
funky Euro-pop dance track, with a break section just before the final chorus where
the beat momentarily becomes less intense (which in the video allows for the
transition to ballroom dancing), followed by the mass dance number when the beat
returns.
As usual, Nick stands out from the rest. He gets to sing the line 'Am I sexual
both times it comes up (which is answered with a falling 'sigh' motive and the wo
'Yeah' sung by the four other boys, a moment that stands out as queer no matter how
you read it), and his mummy costume appears to include some sort of leather bondage
gear, which is a highly anachronistic, sexually charged touch. When the boys come out
of the dream at the end and are discussing their experience, Nick is the only one to
mention anything other than which monster he was, or that he had trouble sleeping.
His line is 'I was a mummy, and there were these two girls .. .' which again plays up
his sexuality, while the others are presented as background, as if it's not worth
bringing up their sexual thoughts. Or, alternately, it plays up his youth; all the Boys
had girls with them during the dream sequence, but only Nick brings it up. Maybe for
the other, more mature Boys, dreaming about girls isn't something they discuss with
each other, it's something they keep to themselves. Or finally, it may be interpreted as
covering up his desire for men - closeted gay men often talk about girls much more
than is seemly, as if to be constantly pointing out just how straight they are. It could be
a case of the lady protesting too much.
Loneliness, the condition of the protagonist before the song's narrative begins, is
itself, though far from exclusively, a very common feeling for gay youth. According to
social worker Paul Gibson, '[g]ay youth are the only group of adolescents with no peer
group to identify with or receive support from. Many report extreme isolation and loss
of close friends' [emphasis mine]. Coming out is a frightening experience, one which
many boys choose to avoid until after high school or away from home altogether.
When a teenager discovers that he is gay, '[j]ust when [he] needs reassurance the most,
those whom [he's] always counted on, [his] parents and friends, become antagonists
to be hoodwinked' (Due 2000, p. 24). Coming out is not always a matter of choice,
however, as other boys may notice his furtive glances in the locker room, in a
day-dream-inducing class, or in any other social situation.
The first verse of 'As Long As You Love Me', which is sung by Nick, suggests
something of this scenario. He's a boy of few friends ('Loneliness has always been a
friend of mine' is the first line of the text), but is willing to, needs to, 'risk' his safe but
unhappy isolation for love. He has been looking - the song is filled with eye imagery
('Risking it all in a glance', 'blind' twice, 'look into my eyes') - and we soon find out
that the object of his affection is Brian. Brian, though he seems more self-assured in the
lyrics he sings than the confused, immature-sounding words of Nick, has also been
hiding a secret ('I've tried to hide it so that no-one knows', he sings). With an
acknowledgement that Brian has a huge amount of power over him (Nick: 'I'm
leaving my life in your hands'), Nick finds the courage to reveal his desire - he's sick
of running from his true self. (Brian reassures him that 'it doesn't really matter if
you're on the run'.) The three other Backstreet Boys, acting as the chorus, only sing
words of acceptance: nothing else matters 'as long as you love me'. Just before the final
chorus, the drum and voices stop for a four-measure recapitulation of the introduc-
tory synthesizer/guitar phrase. It is a reminder at the end of the piece of the begin-
ning, of how the tentative, 'feminine' synthesizer (Nick) has been made whole by the
stronger, 'masculine' guitar sound (Brian).
'As Long As You Love Me' is not only a song with a strong queer sub-text, it also
has a very gay-positive message - one should accept love when you feel it, not try to
hide it, and not care about what anybody else thinks. The fact that this is a love song
which only two singers of the five sing, that no gendered pronouns are used at all, and
that we know (from extramusical sources) that Brian and Nick had a very close
friendship, adds to the suspicion that this gay relationship is being consciously
implied by Martin. Best of all, from a marketing perspective, only people who search
for queer meanings will interpret this song as a gay love duet. Most will hear it as a
love song addressed by the Boys to the listener alone. Gay boys can interpret it one
way, young girls (and their parents) can interpret it in a completely different way;
everyone is pleased, and no one is offended.
The video, directed by Nigel Dick, obscures the queer reading, possibly inten-
tionally. Where the previous two videos ('Everybody' and 'Quit Playin' Games')
emphasised the individuality of the five band members and focused on Nick es-
pecially, this one tries to conflate them into a single entity once again. The scenario is
that the Boys are auditioning for something unspecified before a panel of six beautiful
professional women (to whom all the Boys are clearly attracted). During the verses,
Nick and Brian respectively take centre stage, and during the first one there are a few
scenes where they share a tender moment - Brian adjusts Nick's jacket, they share the
microphone for a single line. But during the choruses the sense of the Boys as a unit is
enhanced: with remote controls, the women are able to turn one Boy into another, and
the whole band is cycled through in this way. Then there is a dance sequence where all
the Boys, dressed identically, perform the same moves. Though Nick again gets more
solo time than the other members, and crucially gets almost the entire opening
sequence to himself, the relationship between him and Brian so strongly suggested in
the song is almost erased from the video.
'All I Have To Give' is the final single from Backstreet's Back. Credited to Full Force, the
song is almost a mirror of 'As Long As You Love Me', with the Boys in the role o
supplicant begging for love, rather than offering their love unconditionally to som
one who has none. It has a very traditional 'feel-good' pop message, that mate
wealth, and especially the lack thereof, cannot stop the power of love. The music i
ballad of average quality, again giving Nick the first solo, followed by solo passag
from Brian, Howie and AJ (Kevin is denied a solo for some unknown reason). Nig
Dick also directed this video, using a concept that he had originally written for
Long As You Love Me'. There are some similarities between the two videos, m
notably the classic style of microphones used. Nick is once more the focus of atten
- he gets the first and last solo shots and a long series of shots at the beginning (as
sings the first verse) where he is the centre of attention. Though all the Boys go
through many outfits, the wavy blue shirt that Nick is wearing in one of his solo scene
is notable for being partially unbuttoned - for the first time ever in a Backstreet B
video, Nick is exposing some of his chest. One assumes that this video is his first p
the age of eighteen, and therefore his mother can no longer prevent him from be
overtly sexualised.
Though the singles and videos are heavily Nick-based, and the 'As Long As Y
Love Me' has a strong queer subtext, the rest of the album is more evenly distribu
among the members. AJ, the 'bad-boy' of the group, gets to take the lead on the m
explicit tracks, such as Cheiron's 'That's The Way I Like It' and 'Mutt' Lange's 'If
Want It To Be Good Girl (Get Yourself A Bad Boy)'. Despite the unwieldy title, th
latter is a good song which has a musical and lyrical edge clearly (one might
deliberately) lacking in the rest of the album. Besides that stand-out track, most
the rest of the album are trite ballads and uninteresting dance numbers, intended
seems to me, to make the rest of the group feel like something more than Nick'
backup singers (and to please the minority of Backstreet Boys fans who don't pref
Nick).
how much they are loved!' we marvel). We don't see them dance in any extended
choreographed sequence, take their shirts off, or act like a traditional boyband should.
What seems to have happened is that, not being content with being the most
popular band in the world, they wanted to be taken seriously as well. They wanted to
write some of their own songs (though these are shunted to the end of the album, or off
it entirely), they wanted to play some of their own instruments (Kevin on piano, Nick
on drum-kit, etc.), they even wanted to direct some of their own videos (Kevin
co-directs the fourth video from Millennium, 'The One'). Musically, this album and the
subsequent one, Black and Blue, are no worse, and may even be better, than the two
which preceded them. This is mostly because Max Martin remains the primary
producer (Denniz PoP died in 1998, and the third Millennium video, 'Show Me The
Meaning Of Being Lonely', is dedicated to him). But the pretentious videos, the
increasing seriousness of the lyrics, the desire to sell their music and not themselves,
and the inability to realise that the essence of their success was in the construction of
Nick as an innocent, but sexually aware, youth, eventually destroyed their fanbase.
Post-Millennium, Nick became much less sexually ambiguous, and, inevitably, much
less youthful: his dress sense became less 'gay', his voice deepened, he gained weight,
he got a tattoo, he grew a goatee, he started publicly having girlfriends.
When it came out, fans of the band's first two albums snapped it up, making
Millennium the fastest selling album in history; two years later, almost half of those
fans responded to The Firm's change in marketing focus by not buying the fourth
Backstreet Boys album Black and Blue (13 million v. 8 million in the USA [Official
Website, 2005]). Nick's subsequent solo album, Now or Never, which was again
helmed by Max Martin, failed miserably in comparison to the other ex-boyband solo
album to come out that same month, Justified, by Justin Timberlake of *NSync. Finally,
in what must have been for them a somewhat humiliating move, the Boys rehired
Johnny Wright to manage them and released a fifth album, called Never Gone, on
14 June 2005 (which has had a fraction of the sales of their previous efforts).
Conclusion
From 1996-1998, the Backstreet Boys rose from nothing to become the most p
music group in the world, and were guided to that enviable position by a numb
people. Johnny and Donna Wright, Louis Pearlman, Denniz PoP and Max Mart
they were the real power behind the band. After the first album of formulaic boyb
pop was created, it became clear that Nick Carter, the youngest, the blondest, the m
agile, most androgynous member was the key to taking the band beyond nor
boyband status to something huge. By writing the hits from the second album
Nick as the featured singer, by dressing Nick in subtly different ways, by keeping
girlfriends out of the media, by keeping his innocence unblemished and his c
firmly covered, Nick was elevated to the status of sexiest and most eligible Back
Boy by the young girls who were the main fan base of the group. But, crucially, Wr
Stuff went beyond that. His boyish, stereotypically gay body-type, his lack of
girlfriends, his appearance on the cover of the gay teen magazine xy, his
friendship' with Brian, and the queer subtexts behind the video of 'Quit P
Games (With My Heart)' and the song 'As Long As You Love Me' all contribute
strong gay following for the group, and especially for Nick.
Queer, straight, or ambivalent, there is no question that Nick was presen
differently from the rest of the Boys. Nick was constructed as the outsider,
youngest and most innocent of the band, and, with wonderful sleight-of-hand, sim-
ultaneously the most sexual. In manufactured pop, according to Simon Frith and
Angela McRobbie, 'male sexuality is transformed into a spiritual yearning carrying
only hints of sexual interaction. What is needed is not so much someone to screw as a
sensitive and sympathetic soulmate, someone to support and nourish the incompe-
tent male adolescent as he grows up' (Frith and McRobbie 1990, p. 375). Nick Carter
clearly plays this role in the Backstreet Boys. He is the youthful, innocent, androgy-
nous boy who needs another person to help him 'become a man'. For his youngest
fans, 'becoming' a man may not have any sexual connotation at all - they may picture
themselves as his surrogate mother, or best friend. Teenaged fans, of both genders, are
liable to see the same things and interpret them sexually.
But, eventually, even the youngest fans grow up and begin to think sexually
about their pin-up idols. If we assume that pop music does influence the sexual
development of its youngest consumers, then it is reasonable to assume that some of
those pubescent straight female Nick Carter fans from the mid-1990s had their ideas of
masculinity shaped by what was essentially a gay male view of the ideal body. It is
also reasonable to assume that for the young gay males who watched, this age-old
stereotype was reinforced, and when Boys switched management to The Firm and
stopped selling Nick as a sexually ambiguous teenager, these gay fans may have
found themselves lusting after someone who was suddenly presented as very
straight.
Though Nick Carter's image was moulded to wrap sensitive ballads and good
dance tunes in a cute, youthful package that girls would feel safe falling in love with
and parents would feel safe buying for their daughters, what may also have happened
is that the team of producers behind the Backstreet Boys (and all the copycat boybands
that followed) have influenced, for some of their former fans, the definition of what
makes a man sexually attractive. While many of them may look at pictures of Nick
from 1998 and cringe, wondering how they could have ever found him attractive,
some may still be attracted to that thin, blonde, androgynous ideal. After all, Nick is
far from the first or last celebrity to look like he did, and the continued popularity of
androgynous boys and men in pop music, film and television means that some of his
fans have just moved on to fancy different, but similar, guys. And for those that have
switched preferences to more traditional ideals of masculinity, the fact that they now
entirely dislike that boyish body-type can probably be attributed to a reaction against
their former infatuations, rather than a disinterested reassessment of male physical
beauty.
For gay people, Wright Stuff's pioneering use of queer subtexts and gay media in
mass-marketing a boyband in the United States may not have had any immediate
socio-political effect. One hopes, however, that by subliminally feeding these queer
images and lyrics, by encouraging an appetite for stereotypically gay male body-type
among straight girls, the straight fans of the Backstreet Boys, other boybands, movie
stars, etc., will be more willing to engage with the queer community, to hang out with
gay boys rather than taunt them, to go dancing with them rather than ostracise them,
and to insist that their governments and politicians treat homosexuals the same as
everybody else. Perhaps that's hugely overestimating the influence that the media has
on youth, or, at least, overstating the longevity of any influence it may hold. But a
generation of girls who grew up lusting after an androgynous boy who sang sensitive
love songs with (or possibly to) a close male friend about accepting love, even when
it's outside society's norms, might well go on to make the short mental leap to
realising that men loving men, and women loving women, is just as acceptable as any
other form of love. And if the American music industry had any role in that particular
generational reversal, then perhaps the Backstreet Boys and Nick Carter will have had
an important social function after all.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Kirsten Yri at Wilfrid Laurier University, and Nicola LeFanu and
John Potter at the University of York for their help and encouragement in the writing
of this paper, as well as the editors and anonymous readers of Popular Music for all
their wonderful advice and endless patience.
References
Discography
Backstreet Boys, Backstreet Boys. Jive 01241-41598-2. 1996
Backstreet's Back. Jive 01241-41617-2. 1997
Millennium. Jive 01241-41672-2. 1999
Black and Blue. Jive 01241-44189-2. 2000
Videography
Backstreet Boys, The Video Hits - Chapter One. Jive 01241-41779-9. 2001