Wang Et Al Probio X Relieves Symptoms of Hyperlipidemia by Regulating Patients Gut Microbiome Blood Lipid Metabolism
Wang Et Al Probio X Relieves Symptoms of Hyperlipidemia by Regulating Patients Gut Microbiome Blood Lipid Metabolism
a Department of Clinical Nutrition, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
b Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Health, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
c Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
d Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
e Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
Huan Wang and Cuicui Ma contributed equally to this work. Author order was determined by type of their contributions.
ABSTRACT Hyperlipidemia is a key risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and it is asso-
ciated with lipid metabolic disorders and gut microbiota dysbiosis. Here, we aimed to
investigate the beneficial effects of 3-month intake of a mixed probiotic formulation in
hyperlipidemic patients (n = 27 and 29 in placebo and probiotic groups, respectively).
The blood lipid indexes, lipid metabolome, and fecal microbiome before and after the
intervention were monitored. Our results showed that probiotic intervention could sig-
nificantly decrease the serum levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol (P , 0.05), while increasing the levels of high-density lipoprotein
cholesterol (P , 0.05) in patients with hyperlipidemia. Probiotic recipients showing
improved blood lipid profile also exhibited significant differences in their lifestyle habits
lipidemia, mechanisms of novel therapeutic strategies, and application of probiotics- Copyright © 2023 Wang et al. This is an open-
access article distributed under the terms of
based therapy. the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International license.
KEYWORDS hyperlipidemia, probiotics, gut microbiota, carnitine, lipid metabolism
Address correspondence to Ruifang Guo,
[email protected].
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
T he rapid development of the world economy has dramatically changed people's living
standards and diet structure, and the fast-food diet structure has also led to an obvious
increase in the proportion of high-fat foods in the daily diet (1). A long-term high-fat diet will
Received 2 November 2022
Accepted 20 March 2023
Published 6 April 2023
not only disrupt the balance of lipid metabolism in the body and cause metabolic disorders
(2), but also lead to chronic diseases, such as hyperlipidemia (3), type 2 diabetes (4), hyper-
tension (5), and obesity (6). Apart from being one of the most common metabolic disorders
caused by a high-calorie diet, hyperlipidemia is also an important contributing factor in car-
diovascular disease (7). The main therapeutic drugs for hyperlipidemia are statins, such as
fluvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin (8). However, it is worth noting that long-term use
of statins can cause certain side effects to the body, and the drugs are relatively costly.
Therefore, it is of interest to find alternative strategies for hyperlipidemia.
Several studies have found a link between hyperlipidemia and human gut microbiota,
for example, significant differences in the gut microbiota profile between hyperlipidemic
and healthy individuals (including animals) (9). It is also thought that alterations in the gut
microbiome are an important cause promoting the onset and progression of hyperlipid-
emia (10). Long-term intake of a high-fat diet not only disrupts gut homeostasis, leading
to gut microbial dysbiosis (11), but potentially damages the gastrointestinal barrier and
permeability (12). Moreover, a long-term high-fat diet may lead to the reduction in both
the ratio of gut Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes and the abundance of fatty acid-producing
bacteria, such as Bacteroides, Lactiplantibacillus, and Blautia (13). In fact, the host gut micro-
biota are closely associated with some liver diseases, implicating the existence of an enter-
ohepatic axis, which influences hepatic (fat) metabolism (14, 15). The liver is an important
site for fat synthesis; however, liver cells can synthesize but not store the fat. Therefore, the
synthesized fat is transported into the bloodstream after combining with apolipoproteins
and cholesterols in the form of very low-density lipoproteins (16). The small intestine is
another important site of lipid synthesis, and it is anticipated that the resident microbiota
could play a critical role in the synthesis and transport of body fat.
Wang et al. found that feeding animals with high-fat diets disrupted both the host’s
antioxidant capacity and gut microbiota balance, ultimately leading to the exacerbation of
hyperlipidemic symptoms (17). Sun et al. found that a high-sucrose diet drastically shifted
the gut microbiota in rats, characterized by an increase in the ratio of Bacteroidetes/
Firmicutes, decrease in alpha diversity, and changes in diurnal oscillations, suggesting that
a high-sucrose diet could reduce the level of blood fat via modulating the gut microbiota
community (18). Ke et al. discovered that symbiotic intervention can reverse high fat diet
(HFD)-induced changes in body weight gain, cholesterol, triglycerides, and microbial pop-
RESULTS
Probio-X improved blood lipid indexes in a hyperlipidemia population. Body
weight, height, and work employment were collected and analyzed (Table 1). No significant
difference was observed in the gender, ethnicity, age, height, weight, BMI, work status, mari-
tal status, and education level between probiotic and placebo groups (P . 0.05 in all cases).
There were no significant differences in all blood biochemistry between the placebo and
probiotic groups at baseline. The blood analysis of hyperlipidemic patients showed that the
total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels decreased significantly after
probiotic consumption (paired t test, P , 0.05; Fig. 1A), while the high-density lipoprotein
(HDL-C) levels increased significantly (paired t test, P , 0.05). In contrast, in the placebo
group, only blood HDL-C levels (paired t test, P . 0.05), but not TC, triglyceride (TG), and
LDL-C levels (paired t test, P , 0.05), significantly decreased after the 3-month intervention
period (P , 0.05). However, both groups showed a significant decrease in fasting glucose
(paired t test, P , 0.05). The consumption of Probio-X not only significantly reduced the
body weight, visceral fat, and blood fat of patients, but also effectively prevented loss in their
bone mineral density (paired t test, P . 0.05; Fig. 1B). The analysis of gut mucosa indicators
FIG 1 Probio-X improved blood lipid indexes in hyperlipidemia patients. (A) Comparative analysis of (A) blood indicators; (B) body weight and composition; (C) gut
mucosa indicators. (D) Number of patients that were responsive toward probiotic treatment, evaluated by changes in four key blood lipid indicators. Chi-square test
was performed to evaluate the overall difference between two groups. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein;
TG, triglyceride; *, P , 0.05; **, P , 0.01; ***, P , 0.001 (t test). Pla_0M and Pla_3M indicate before and 3 months after the placebo intervention, respectively,
and Pro_0M and Pro_3M before and 3 months after the probiotic intervention, respectively.
(Fig. 1C) revealed no significant change in diamine oxidase, D-lactate, and endotoxin
in both groups of patients (paired t test, P . 0.05), though it is worth noting that the pro-
biotic group had significantly lower values in the aforementioned indicators (unpaired t test,
P , 0.05).
We further analyzed changes in the four main blood lipid indicators in the placebo
and probiotic groups (Fig. 1D), and our results revealed that significantly more patients
in the probiotic group showed improvements in TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C than the placebo
group (chi-square test, P , 0.05), while no significant difference was found in the number
of patients showing improvement in TG (chi-square test, P . 0.05). These results demon-
strated that the consumption of Probio-X could significantly improve some major clinical
indicators related to hyperlipidemia.
Probio-X improved dietary and exercise habits in hyperlipidemic patients. A
self-administered questionnaire was applied to record the dietary and exercise habits
of the hyperlipidemic patients during the trial intervention. We thus analyzed changes
in dietary and exercise habits in patients showing improvements in TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C.
Interestingly, patients in the probiotic group that showed a significant decrease in TC
(Fig. 2A) also increased their daily vegetable and dairy product consumption, as well as
time of weekly exercise, compared to the preintervention period (chi-square test, P , 0.05),
while those in the placebo group did not show any significant changes in these aspects
after the intervention (chi-square test, P . 0.05). Similarly, patients in the probiotic group
that had lowered LDL-C levels (Fig. 2B) increased daily vegetable and dairy product con-
sumption (chi-square test, P , 0.05), though no significant change was observed in their
weekly exercise time compared to preintervention (chi-square test, P . 0.05). Such changes
were not observed in the placebo group (chi-square test, P . 0.05). In contrast, patients
from both the probiotic and placebo groups showing improvement in HDL-C (Fig. 2C)
did not exhibit obvious changes in their dietary and exercise habits (chi-square test, P . 0.05).
Meanwhile, the patients’ feeling of gastrointestinal wellness was analyzed (Fig. 2D).
Significantly less diarrhea frequency was observed in subjects given Probio-X compared
with those receiving placebo material (chi-square test, P , 0.05), while there was no
significant difference in the occurrences of abdominal pain, bloating, and constipation
between the two groups (chi-square test, P . 0.05). These results together showed that
the improvement in major blood lipid indexes was accompanied by healthier lifestyle
FIG 2 Probio-X improved dietary and exercise habits and gastrointestinal wellness in hyperlipidemia patients. Comparative analysis of habits
of vegetables/dairy product consumption and weekly exercise in (A) patients with normal total cholesterol (TC); (B) low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C)
populations; and (C) high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) remission populations. (D) Comparative analysis of patients’ feelings of gastrointestinal wellness.
Pla_0M and Pla_3M indicate before and 3 months after the placebo intervention, respectively, and Pro_0M and Pro_3M before and 3 months after
the probiotic intervention, respectively.
changes after the 3-month treatment (paired Wilcoxon test, P . 0.05; Fig. 3H), while significant
increases were observed in three of the strains (Bifidobacterium animalis Probio-M8,
Bifidobacterium animalis V9, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P-8) after 3 months of pro-
biotic mix intervention (paired Wilcoxon test, P , 0.05; Fig. 3H).
Changes in patients’ serum lipid profile after Probio-X intervention. It is known
that gut microbiota interacts with the host metabolism and influences the blood metabo-
lome. Therefore, patients’ lipid blood metabolic profile was analyzed by principal-compo-
nent analysis (Fig. 4). However, symbols representing the four subgroups (placebo and
probiotic groups at baseline and after 3-month intervention) largely overlapped on the
principal-component analysis score plot, indicating that the probiotic treatment did not
cause significant changes in the overall blood lipid metabolome structure (Fig. 4A and B).
Then, volcano plot analysis was performed to look for differential metabolites between
placebo and probiotics groups after the intervention, which identified only two significantly
increased differential metabolites, acetyl-carnitine and free carnitine after probiotic inter-
vention (fold change [FC] . 2, P , 0.05; Fig. 4C and D). There was, however, a general
decrease in other differential metabolites identified after postprobiotic intervention (identi-
fied only based on paired Wilcoxon test, P , 0.05; Fig. 4E). A finer analysis of the blood lipid
metabolites based on class grouping (into eight categories: MG, monoglyceride; CAR, acyl
carnitine; CE, cholesterol lipids; FFA, free fatty acids; LPI, lysophosphatidylinositol; PI,
phosphatidylinositol; PS, phosphatidyl serine, TG, triglyceride; Fig. 4F) revealed no signifi-
cant difference in all metabolite categories between probiotic and placebo groups after
the intervention (unpaired Wilcoxon test, P . 0.05).
Changes in predicted gut metabolites after Probio-X intervention. The probiotic
treatment did not seem to drastically modulated patients’ fecal microbiota structure and
composition; thus, we further investigated the mechanisms of regulation of hyperlipidemia
by analyzing probiotics-driven changes in predicted gut metabolites from the MAGs. A total
of 41 gut metabolites were predicted across 337 MAGs (selection criteria: integrity greater
than 80, contamination less than 10, and relative abundance greater than 1%; data not
shown). The gut metabolite, MGB043, was common to the majority of MAGs, while MGB034,
MGB055, MGB056, and MF0059 were predicted to be present exclusively in only one MAG.
A total of 20 gut metabolites were predicted from the MGB database, including the major
metabolites MGB011 and MGB043 (Fig. 5A), while a total of 21 gut metabolites were pre-
dicted from the MF database (MF0103 and MF0067 as the major metabolites; Fig. 5B).
Forty-one significantly differential metabolites between the probiotic and placebo groups
were detected after the intervention (Fig. 5C); nine were significantly enriched (e.g., cortisol
degradation, glycolysis, and pentose phosphate pathway; unpaired Wilcoxon test, P , 0.05
in each case) or deprived (e.g., tryptophan synthesis, quinolinic acid degradation, and galac-
turonate degradation I et al.; unpaired Wilcoxon test, P , 0.05 in each case) after the probi-
otic treatment.
DISCUSSION
Gut microbiota are associated with the host metabolism and may influence the onset
and development of hyperlipidemia (23). Probiotics have been shown to lower blood TC,
LDL-C, and TG, alleviating metabolic syndrome in hyperlipidemic rats (21). This study
analyzed the effects of a mixed probiotic formulation on hyperlipidemia, with focus on
changes in patients’ gut microbiota and their metabolic potential.
Our data supported that the intake of the probiotic mix could effectively reduce the
serum levels of TC and LDL-C, while increasing serum HDL-C levels, in patients with hyperlipid-
emia. Such results supported that probiotic application could regulate hosts’ lipid metabolism.
There are different subtypes of dyslipidemia (e.g., high cholesterol and/or high triglycerides),
which would require different treatment approaches. For example, Yan et al. found that
oryzanol could reduce the TC of serum in rats (24), while Liu et al. found that Tartary
buckwheat protein could significantly reduce LDL-C levels and increase HDL-C levels in
the sera of hyperlipidemic rats (25). Although these functional products could reduce
some of the blood lipid indices in hyperlipidemic rats, only the Probio-X applied to this
could effectively modulate all three important blood lipid indexes, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C,
in hyperlipidemic subjects, suggesting that probiotics are potential functional products
for alleviating hyperlipidemia.
as cancer, kidney disease, gastrointestinal diseases, mental illness, or type I diabetes; (ii) takin antibiotics, pro-
biotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, and immunosuppressive agents within 1 month before the intervention or
during the intervention; (iii) irregular eating habits during the intervention and follow-up period; and (iv) fail-
ure to collect stool and blood samples twice. Forty-three subjects were excluded after the first round of
screening; sixty-nine patients were randomly assigned to probiotic (n = 35) and placebo (n = 34) groups.
After being informed of the specific experimental guidelines and details, three patients withdrew from the
trial; seven patients discontinued intervention for their consumption of antibiotics or yogurt; and three
patients lacked stool samples. Thus, 29 and 27 subjects subsequently remained in the probiotic and placebo
groups. Both participants and researchers were unaware of the group allocation throughout the trial. The
two groups of patients received a daily dose of two grams of probiotic or placebo preparation, respectively.
The placebo preparation comprised maltodextrin, which was identical to the probiotic preparation in pack-
aging and in sensory aspects (e.g., taste and smell). The probiotic preparation contained the placebo material
(excipient) plus probiotics (a total of 3 1010 CFU/g). No patients took any probiotics, antibiotics, or yogurt
during the trial. Patients’ diet and lifestyle information were collected by a self-administered questionnaire
for subsequent correlation analyses. Written, informed consent from legal guardians was obtained from
each participant.
Collection and processing of stool and blood samples. The study was conducted for 3 months,
and feces and blood were collected from all participants at days 0 and 90 after the start of the study.
Stool samples were self-collected by each subject at the specified time point at home using a uniformly
provided sterile stool sampler with DNA protection solution (Guangdong Longhai Biomedical Co., Ltd.,
Guangzhou, China). All patients were given prior training in the fecal collection procedure to prevent
fecal contamination during the collection process. Collected samples were transported to the hospital at low
temperature and were stored in a 280°C freezer before the next steps of sample processing for deep metage-
nomic sequencing.
All patients were asked to visit the hospital after stool sample collection, when blood samples (after a
12-h fast) were taken. All collected blood samples were stored in sterile centrifuge tubes, before centrifug-
ing at 4°C for 15 min at 3,000 g for serum collection. Collected serum samples were stored at 280°C pending
further analysis.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Inner Mongolia People's Hospital (no. 201811002)
and was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn/; registration number
ChiCTR1900026469). Informed consent was obtained from all recruited subjects prior to the study.
Analysis of biochemical indicators. Blood samples were used for monitoring physiological and bio-
chemical changes in the subjects. The analyzed physiological/biochemical parameters mainly focused
on lipid metabolism, namely, LDL-C, TC, HDL-C, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP], fasting serum
glucose, TG, serum uric acid, diamine oxidase, D-lactate, and endotoxin. All biochemical analysis was performed
by the Inner Mongolia People's Hospital.
Fecal metagenomics analysis. (i) DNA extraction. After thawing the fecal samples, two grams of
each fecal sample was weighed and used for metagenomic DNA extraction. The metagenomic DNA was
extracted with the QIAamp DNA Stool minikit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. The purity and quality of the extracted DNA were ensured by a NanoDrop spectrophotome-
The mixture was vortexed for 2 min, sonicated for 5 min, before adding 500 m L of distilled water, vortexed for
1 min, and centrifuged for 10 min (4°C and 1,2000 rpm). Then, 500 m L of the supernatant was accurately pipet-
ted into a new prelabeled centrifuge tube, which was then concentrated and reconstituted into a final volume
of 100 m L with acetonitrile containing 0.04% acetic acid (i.e., the mobile phase B for LC- tandem mass spec-
trometry, MS/MS, analysis).
(ii) Ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrome-
try (UPLC-Q-TOF MS). Serum lipid profile was mainly performed by UPLC Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU
CBM30A, SHIMADZU, Kyot liquid phase were: the column (Water ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 1.8 m m,
2.1 mm*100mm); mobile phases, ultrapure water (0.04% acetic acid) for phase A and acetonitrile (0.04%
acetic acid) for phase B; flow rate of 0.4 mL/min; column temperature of 40°C; injection volume of 5 m L.
The MS conditions were as follows: electrospray ionization (ESI) temperature of 550°C; MS voltages of
5,500 V (positive) and 24,500 V (negative); ion source gas I of 55 lb/in2, gas II of 60 lb/in2, curtain gas of
25 lb/in2; and collision-activated dissociation parameters set to high (47). Qualitative analysis was per-
formed using a self-built metware database, MWDB, identifying metabolites based on retention time,
ion pair information, and secondary spectrum data of the detected substances.
Statistical analysis and data visualization. All statistical analyses were performed using the R soft-
ware (v 4.0.3), and data were expressed as mean 6 SD. Wilcoxon test and t test were used to evaluate differen-
ces in blood indicators, fecal microbiome, and lipid metabolites between groups/subgroups. The chi-square
test was used to calculate the difference between counts. The R package vegan was used for alpha and beta
diversity analysis. The R package Psych was used for Spearman’s correlation analysis. Principal coordinate analy-
sis (Bray-Curtis distance) and principal-component analysis were performed with R. LEfSe analysis was per-
formed with R. Data were visualized with R software.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the Inner Mongolia Science and Technology Major
Projects (2021ZD0014), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31720103911),
the Health Science and Technology Planning Project of Inner Mongolia (202202026), and
the earmarked fund for CARS36.
We declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Zhu Z, Lin Z, Jiang H, Jiang Y, Zhao M, Liu X. 2017. Hypolipidemic effect of 12. Zhou D, Pan Q, Xin FZ, Zhang RN, He CX, Chen GY, Liu C, Chen YW, Fan
Youcha in hyperlipidemia rats induced by high-fat diet. Food Funct 8: JG. 2017. Sodium butyrate attenuates high-fat diet-induced steatohepati-
1680–1687. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FO00089H. tis in mice by improving gut microbiota and gastrointestinal barrier.
2. Zhou X, Li Z, Qi M, Zhao P, Duan Y, Yang G, Yuan L. 2020. Brown adipose tis- World J Gastroenterol 23:60–75. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.60.
sue-derived exosomes mitigate the metabolic syndrome in high fat diet mice. 13. Yan J, Xue Q, Chen W, Wang K, Peng D, Jiang J, Li P, Du B. 2022. Probiotic-
Theranostics 10:8197–8210. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.43968. fermented rice buckwheat alleviates high-fat diet-induced hyperlipidemia in
22. Hou Q, Zhao F, Liu W, Lv R, Khine WWT, Han J, Sun Z, Lee YK, Zhang H. 35. Gessner DK, Schwarz A, Meyer S, Wen G, Most E, Zorn H, Ringseis R, Eder
2020. Probiotic-directed modulation of gut microbiota is basal microbiome K. 2019. Insect meal as alternative protein source exerts pronounced lipid-
dependent. Gut Microbes 12:1736974. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2020 lowering effects in hyperlipidemic obese Zucker rats. J Nutr 149:566–577.
.1736974. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxy256.
23. Holmes E, Li JV, Athanasiou T, Ashrafian H, Nicholson JK. 2011. Under- 36. Burlina AP, Sershen H, Debler EA, Lajtha A. 1989. Uptake of acetyl-L-carnitine in
standing the role of gut microbiome–host metabolic signal disruption in the brain. Neurochem Res 14:489–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00964865.
health and disease. Trends Microbiol 19:349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim 37. Virmani MA, Conti R, Spadoni A, Rossi S, Arrigoni-Martelli E. 1994. L-carnitine
.2011.05.006. uptake into primary rat cortical cultures: interaction with GABA. Brain Res Mol
24. Yan S, Chen J, Zhu L, Guo T, Qin D, Hu Z, Han S, Zhou Y, Akan OD, Wang J, Brain Res 25:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-328X(94)90284-4.
Luo F, Lin Q. 2022. Oryzanol attenuates high fat and cholesterol diet- 38. Yang C, Peng C, Jin H, You L, Wang J, Xu H, Sun Z. 2021. Comparison of the
induced hyperlipidemia by regulating the gut microbiome and amino composition and function of the gut microbiome in herdsmen from two pas-
acid metabolism. J Agric Food Chem 70:6429–6443. https://doi.org/10.1021/ ture regions, Hongyuan and Xilingol. Food Sci Nutr 9:3258–3268. https://doi
acs.jafc.2c00885. .org/10.1002/fsn3.2290.
25. Liu H, Pan LL, Lv S, Yang Q, Zhang H, Chen W, Lv Z, Sun J. 2019. Alterations 39. Truong DT, Franzosa EA, Tickle TL, Scholz M, Weingart G, Pasolli E, Tett A,
of gut microbiota and blood lipidome in gestational diabetes mellitus with hy- Huttenhower C, Segata N. 2015. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic
perlipidemia. Front Physiol 10:1015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01015. taxonomic profiling. Nat Methods 12:902–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/
26. Wastyk HC, Fragiadakis GK, Perelman D, Dahan D, Merrill BD, Yu FB, Topf nmeth.3589.
M, Gonzalez CG, Van Treuren W, Han S, Robinson JL, Elias JE, Sonnenburg 40. Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast sin-
ED, Gardner CD, Sonnenburg JL. 2021. Gut-microbiota-targeted diets modu- gle-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via suc-
cinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. https://doi.org/10
late human immune status. Cell 184:4137–4153.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/
.1093/bioinformatics/btv033.
j.cell.2021.06.019.
41. Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT
27. Lee J-B, Ahn H, Kwaon S-M, Kim M-J. 2022. Research on hyperlipidemia
2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome recon-
improvement and diet fresh convenience HMR product development.
struction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359. https://doi.org/10
The Korean J Food and Nutrition 35:159–166.
.7717/peerj.7359.
28. McFarland LV, Goh S. 2019. Are probiotics and prebiotics effective in the
42. Nissen JN, Johansen J, Allesøe RL, Sønderby CK, Armenteros JJA, Grønbech
prevention of travellers' diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
CH, Jensen LJ, Nielsen HB, Petersen TN, Winther O, Rasmussen S. 2021.
Travel Med Infect Dis 27:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2018.09.007.
Improved metagenome binning and assembly using deep variational
29. Lu D, Yan J, Liu F, Ding P, Chen B, Lu Y, Sun Z. 2019. Probiotics in prevent-
autoencoders. Nat Biotechnol 39:555–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587
ing and treating chemotherapy-induced diarrhea: a meta-analysis. Asia -020-00777-4.
Pac J Clin Nutr 28:701–710. 43. Wu YW, Simmons BA, Singer SW. 2016. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning
30. Lai HH, Chiu CH, Kong MS, Chang CJ, Chen CC. 2019. Probiotic Lactobacil- algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bio-
lus casei: effective for managing childhood diarrhea by altering gut micro- informatics 32:605–607. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638.
biota and attenuating fecal inflammatory markers. Nutrients 11:1150. 44. Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, Banfield
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11051150. JF. 2018. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication,
31. Liu A, Ma T, Xu N, Jin H, Zhao F, Kwok LY, Zhang H, Zhang S, Sun Z. 2021. aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol 3:836–843. https://doi
Adjunctive probiotics alleviates asthmatic symptoms via modulating the .org/10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1.
gut microbiome and serum metabolome. Microbiol Spectr 9:e0085921. 45. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00859-21. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from iso-
32. Chen M, Guo WL, Li QY, Xu JX, Cao YJ, Liu B, Yu XD, Rao PF, Ni L, Lv XC. lates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. https://
2020. The protective mechanism of Lactobacillus plantarum FZU3013 against doi.org/10.1101/gr.186072.114.
non-alcoholic fatty liver associated with hyperlipidemia in mice fed a high-fat 46. Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. 2017. dRep: a tool for fast and