SEMESTER-II

UNIT-5

“THE FELLING OF THE BANYAN TREE” by Dilip Chitre

.
About the Poet:
Dilip Chitre (1938–2009) was an Indian poet, translator, and artist known for his poignant and
reflective poetry. His works often explore themes such as identity, existentialism, and the
complexities of Indian life. Chitre’s poetry blends traditional Indian symbols with modernist
thought, and his reflections on life and death resonate with both personal and universal themes.

About the Poem:

"The Felling of the Banyan Tree" by Dilip Chitre is a deeply emotional and symbolic poem about
the destruction of nature and the loss of one’s roots. The banyan tree stands as a symbol of
tradition, culture, memory, and the past. The poem tells the story of how the speaker’s father
removed all the trees around their house in the name of progress. The cutting down of the banyan
tree is portrayed as a violent act that disconnects the speaker from his past and leads to a spiritual
emptiness. It also reflects the tension between modern decisions and old values.

Stanza-by-Stanza Explanation:

Stanza 1:
My father told the tenants to leave
Who lived on the houses surrounding our house on the hill
One by one the structures were demolished
Only our own house remained and the trees
 The poem begins with the speaker’s father asking the tenants to vacate their houses.
These houses were around the speaker’s family home on a hill.
 All the other structures were taken down, but their own house and the surrounding trees
were left.
 This marks the beginning of change and destruction around them.

Stanza 2:
Trees are sacred my grandmother used to say
Felling them is a crime but he massacred them all
The sheoga, the oudumber, the neem were all cut down
But the huge banyan tree stood like a problem
 The speaker recalls how his grandmother believed that trees are sacred and should not be
cut.
 Despite this belief, the father cut down all the trees without hesitation, calling it a
"massacre."
 Specific trees like sheoga, oudumber, and neem are mentioned, showing the variety and
richness of the flora.
 The banyan tree, however, remained—it was so big and strong that it seemed like a
“problem.”
Stanza 3:
Whose roots lay deeper than all our lives
My father ordered it to be removed
The banyan tree was three times as tall as our house
Its trunk had a circumference of fifty feet
 The banyan tree had deep roots, symbolizing its strong connection to the land and the
family’s history.
 The father still gave the command to remove it, showing his disregard for tradition and
emotion.
 The poet gives us a sense of how massive the tree was—three times taller than the house,
and with a huge trunk.

Stanza 4:
Its scraggy aerial roots fell to the ground
From thirty feet or more so first they cut the branches
Sawing them off for seven days and the heap was huge
Insects and birds began to leave the tree
 The tree had long aerial roots hanging from great heights.
 The process of cutting it began with the branches, which took seven days due to the size.
 A large heap of wood was formed.
 As the tree was being destroyed, the living creatures—birds and insects—left, showing
how the tree was once a home to many.

Stanza 5:
And then they came to its massive trunk
Fifty men with axes chopped and chopped
The great tree revealed its rings of two hundred years
We watched in terror and fascination this slaughter
 After the branches, the men attacked the huge trunk of the tree.
 It took fifty men with axes, showing how difficult it was to bring down.
 The tree was two hundred years old, proven by the rings in its trunk.
 The speaker watched the cutting with both terror and fascination, showing the
emotional impact and shock.

Stanza 6:
As a raw mythology revealed to us its age
Soon afterwards we left Baroda for Bombay
Where there are no trees except the one
Which grows and seethes in one’s dreams, its aerial roots
Looking for the ground to strike.
 The ancient tree was like a "raw mythology," a living legend that revealed its history as it
was destroyed.
 After the tree was felled, the family moved from Baroda to Bombay—a city where there
are no trees.
 The only tree left is now in the speaker’s dreams, growing emotionally inside him.
  Its aerial roots still search for the ground—a symbol of the speaker’s longing for
connection, stability, and belonging.

Themes in the Poem:

1. Destruction of Nature:
The poem shows how trees, which are sacred and full of life, are destroyed by human hands in
the name of development or change.
2. Conflict Between Tradition and Modernity:
The grandmother’s beliefs and the speaker’s emotions represent traditional respect for nature,
while the father’s actions represent modern, practical thinking.
3. Disconnection from Roots:
Cutting down the banyan tree symbolizes losing one's history, family connection, and cultural
roots.
4. Memory and Inner Loss:
Even after moving to the city, the image of the tree remains in the speaker’s dreams, showing
that the emotional loss is permanent and lives on inside him.

Conclusion:
In “The Felling of the Banyan Tree,” Dilip Chitre presents a painful story of loss—loss of
nature, culture, and personal roots. The banyan tree, strong and sacred, becomes a victim of
change. Its removal marks the end of a way of life and the beginning of alienation in a modern
world. Through simple yet powerful language, the poem expresses how deeply nature is tied to
our emotions, and how cutting it off leaves a lasting emptiness that continues to grow inside us.

"THE BET" by Anton Chekhov

About the Author:

Anton Chekhov (1860–1904) was a Russian playwright and short story writer, widely considered
one of the greatest literary figures in Russian literature. Chekhov’s works are known for their
deep psychological insight, simplicity, and the exploration of the human condition. His writing
often reflects themes of human suffering, isolation, and the complexities of relationships, all
conveyed through subtle humor and irony. Among his most famous works are the plays The
Cherry Orchard, Uncle Vanya, and Three Sisters, as well as numerous short stories. Chekhov is
credited with shaping the modern short story, focusing on everyday life and the nuances of
human nature.

About the Story:

The Bet is a short story written by Anton Chekhov, first published in 1889. The story explores
themes of human nature, the value of life, the consequences of greed and ambition, and the
futility of material wealth. It revolves around a wager between a wealthy banker and a young
lawyer, in which the lawyer agrees to spend fifteen years in solitary confinement in exchange for
two million rubles. Through the course of the story, Chekhov delves into the psychological
effects of isolation, the changes in the characters' beliefs and values over time, and the ultimate
futility of their bet. The Bet is a powerful commentary on the human condition and the arbitrary
nature of wealth and success.

Summary of "The Bet":

The Bet begins with a conversation between a young lawyer and a wealthy banker at a party. The
discussion centers around the death penalty and whether it is more humane than life
imprisonment. The banker asserts that the death penalty is more merciful, while the lawyer
argues that life imprisonment is less cruel. The two men’s disagreement escalates into a wager,
with the lawyer agreeing to spend fifteen years in solitary confinement without any human
interaction. In return, if he successfully completes the term, he would be awarded two million
rubles by the banker.

The lawyer is placed in a small, well-equipped house on the banker’s estate, where he is allowed
books, wine, and music but has no contact with the outside world. Initially, the lawyer struggles
with loneliness and the challenges of his isolation, but over the course of the years, he begins to
read extensively, exploring literature, philosophy, and languages. The lawyer’s intellectual
journey becomes his primary focus, and he gains a deeper understanding of life, often moving
from one idea to another in search of meaning.

However, as the years pass, the lawyer’s perspective shifts. He gradually loses interest in worldly
pleasures and material possessions, and his focus turns to spiritual reflection. Over time, he
becomes disillusioned with human life, rejecting the notion of wealth and the pursuit of material
success. His intellectual transformation leads him to the conclusion that the things people strive
for—such as wealth, power, and social status—are ultimately meaningless.

Meanwhile, the banker faces his own set of difficulties. Over the years, his financial situation
worsens, and he becomes anxious about the prospect of losing two million rubles if the lawyer
completes the bet. As the fifteen-year term draws to a close, the banker’s fear reaches a peak, and
he begins to consider drastic measures to avoid paying the lawyer. Desperate to avoid the
payment, the banker even contemplates murdering the lawyer to ensure he does not win the bet.

However, when the lawyer is only a few hours away from completing the term, the banker
sneaks into the lawyer’s room, only to find a letter that the lawyer had written. In the letter, the
lawyer renounces the two million rubles, declaring that he no longer wants the money. He has
come to realize that worldly possessions hold no value, and he would rather die than accept such
a prize. The lawyer explains that he has chosen to leave the bet voluntarily, thus rendering the
whole affair meaningless.

The banker, having lost his moral compass and almost committed a terrible crime to preserve his
wealth, realizes that he is left with nothing but his fortune, which now seems hollow in
comparison to the lawyer’s spiritual transformation. The lawyer walks away from the estate
moments before the bet concludes, leaving the banker to reflect on the futility of his pursuit of
wealth and power.
Themes in "The Bet":

1. The Futility of Materialism: One of the central themes of the story is the futility of
material wealth. While the banker is obsessed with accumulating wealth and the lawyer
initially seeks the two million rubles, both characters ultimately come to realize that
money cannot buy happiness or spiritual fulfillment. The lawyer’s renouncement of the
prize underscores this theme, showing that a life devoted to material gain is ultimately
empty.
2. The Nature of Human Suffering: Through the lawyer’s fifteen years of solitude,
Chekhov explores the psychological effects of isolation. While the lawyer initially finds
solace in books and intellectual pursuits, over time, he comes to understand the
limitations of worldly pleasures and the value of introspection. His suffering is not
physical but emotional and intellectual, reflecting on the nature of human existence.
3. Time and Change: The passage of time plays a significant role in the story, illustrating
how the lawyer changes over the fifteen years. The story explores how time can lead to
self-discovery, transformation, and an altered perspective on life. The lawyer’s
intellectual and emotional journey over these years reveals the difference between
youthful ambition and the wisdom that comes with experience.
4. The Corruption of Power and Wealth: The banker, who initially agrees to the bet out
of pride and a sense of superiority, becomes consumed by fear of losing his wealth. His
internal moral decay is a key part of the story, showing how wealth and power can
corrupt a person’s values and lead them to make morally questionable decisions, like
contemplating the murder of the lawyer.
5. The Illusion of Free Will and Control: Throughout the story, Chekhov plays with the
idea that the characters believe they have control over their circumstances—whether it’s
the banker’s confidence that the lawyer will fail, or the lawyer’s initial belief that he can
survive the confinement. In the end, both characters realize that the real control is not in
their hands, but in the deeper, more existential understanding of life.

Conclusion:

The Bet by Anton Chekhov is a thought-provoking and ironic exploration of human nature,
materialism, and the passage of time. Through the characters of the banker and the lawyer,
Chekhov presents a critique of society’s obsession with wealth and the emptiness that often
accompanies it. The story raises questions about the true value of life, the impact of isolation,
and the potential for personal transformation. With its ironic twist and philosophical insights,
The Bet continues to resonate with readers, offering timeless reflections on the nature of human
existence and the consequences of our choices.

UNIT-6

“A WALK BY MOONLIGHT” by Henry Derozio

About the Poet:

Henry Derozio (1809–1831) was an Indian poet, teacher, and social reformer, often regarded as a
key figure in the early Romantic movement in Indian literature. Derozio's poetry reflects a deep
engagement with themes of individualism, nature, love, and philosophical reflection. He was
influenced by European Romanticism and often explored the complexities of life and the
mysteries of existence. As a teacher at the Hindu College in Calcutta, he was instrumental in
shaping young minds and encouraging a questioning of societal norms, advocating for education,
and social reforms.

About the Poem:

A Walk by Moonlight is a reflective and deeply emotional poem in which Derozio describes a
night walk under the moon. What starts as a simple evening stroll transforms into a powerful
spiritual and philosophical experience. The poet expresses how nature, especially the moonlight,
awakens deep thoughts and feelings in him. He discovers a connection between human emotions
and the natural world and realizes that even the smallest things in nature have life and meaning.
The moonlight doesn’t just illuminate the path—it also enlightens his heart and soul.

Stanza-by-Stanza Explanation:

Stanza 1:
Last night — it was a lovely night,
And I was very blest —
Shall it not be for Memory
A happy spot to rest?
 The poet recalls a beautiful night.
 He feels "blest" or blessed, suggesting that it brought him joy and peace.
 He believes this memory will become a comforting place in his mind to return to.

Stanza 2:
Yes; there are in the backward past
Soft hours to which we turn —
Hours which, at distance, mildly shine,
Shine on, but never burn.
 The poet reflects on gentle moments from the past.
 These memories glow softly like distant stars or moonlight—comforting but not painful.

Stanza 3:
And some of these but yesternight
Across my path were thrown,
Which made my heart so very light,
I think it could have flown.
 The pleasant memories were made just last night.
 The experience was so joyful that it made his heart feel light, almost like it could fly.
Stanza 4:
I had been out to see a friend
With whom I others saw:
Like minds to like minds ever tend —
An universal law.
 He went to visit a friend, and met other people too.
 He says that people with similar thoughts naturally come together—it's a universal truth.

Stanza 5:
And when we were returning home,
"Come who will walk with me,
A little way", I said, and lo!
I straight was joined by three:
 On the way back, the poet asked if anyone would walk with him for a while.
 Three people joined him, showing a sense of companionship.

Stanza 6:
Three whom I loved — two had high thoughts
And were, in age, my peers;
And one was young, but oh! endeared
As much as youth endears.
 The three companions were dear to the poet.
 Two were thoughtful and close to him in age.
 One was younger but still very precious to him.

Stanza 7:
The moon stood silent in the sky,
And looked upon our earth:
The clouds divided, passing by,
In homage to her worth.
 The moon is described as quietly watching the earth.
 Even the clouds seem to move away respectfully, honoring the moon’s beauty.

Stanza 8:
There was a dance among the leaves
Rejoicing at her power,
Who robes for them of silver weaves
Within one mystic hour.
 The leaves seem to dance happily under the moonlight.
 The moonlight makes the leaves shine like they are dressed in silver.

Stanza 9:
There was a song among the winds,
Hymning her influence —
That low-breathed minstrelsy which binds
The soul to thought intense.
  The winds seem to sing a soft song in praise of the moon.
 This quiet music stirs deep thoughts and feelings in the poet’s soul.

Stanza 10:
And there was something in the night
That with its magic wound us;
For we — oh! we not only saw,
But felt the moonlight around us.
 The night had a magical effect on them.
 They didn’t just see the moonlight—they could feel it deeply.

Stanza 11:
How vague are all the mysteries
Which bind us to our earth;
How far they send into the heart
Their tones of holy mirth;
 The poet wonders about the mysterious things in nature that connect us to the world.
 These mysteries bring a kind of sacred joy to the heart.

Stanza 12:
How lovely are the phantoms dim
Which bless that better sight,
That man enjoys when proud he stands
In his own spirit's light;
 The poet admires the dim, dream-like visions we see in a deep emotional state.
 He says that when a person is spiritually aware, he sees beyond the physical world.

Stanza 13:
When, like a thing that is not ours,
This earthliness goes by,
And we behold the spiritualness
Of all that cannot die.
 At such moments, the physical world seems to fade away.
 The poet begins to see the everlasting spiritual side of life.

Stanza 14:
'Tis then we understand the voice
Which in the night-wind sings,
And feel the mystic melody
Played on the forest's strings.
 The poet feels that during these spiritual moments, nature speaks to us.
 The wind and the forest seem to play a magical music that we can feel.

Stanza 15:
The silken language of the stars
Becomes the tongue we speak,
And then we read the sympathy
That pales the young moon's cheek.
 In these deep moments, we understand the silent language of the stars.
 We even sense emotions in the moon—like it blushes with sympathy.

Stanza 16:
The inward eye is open then
To glories, which in dreams
Visit the sleeper's couch, in robes
Woven of the rainbow's beams.
 The poet’s “inward eye” (imagination or inner mind) is open.
 He sees dream-like beauty, as if from rainbows—glorious and magical.

Stanza 17:
I bless my nature that I am
Allied to all the bliss,
Which other worlds we're told afford,
But which I find in this.
 The poet is thankful that he can feel joy and bliss not just in dreams or other worlds, but
right here in the natural world.

Stanza 18:
My heart is bettered when I feel
That even this human heart
To all around is gently bound,
And forms of all a part;
 His heart feels more kind and improved when he realizes it is connected to everything
around him.
 He feels like a part of all life—nature and the universe.

Stanza 19:
That, cold and lifeless as they seem,
The flowers, the stars, the sky
Have more than common minds may deem
To stir our sympathy.
 The poet says that even things that seem lifeless—like flowers, stars, and sky—have
power to touch our emotions deeply.

Stanza 20:
Oh! in such moments can I crush
The grass beneath my feet?
Ah no; the grass has then a voice,
Its heart — I hear it beat.
 In such a spiritual state, the poet becomes so sensitive that he cannot even step on the
grass.
 He feels like the grass is alive and he can hear its heartbeat.
Themes in the Poem:
1. Nature as a Spiritual Experience:
Nature, especially moonlight, connects the poet to a deeper, spiritual understanding of life.
2. Emotional Awakening:
The night walk awakens feelings of joy, sympathy, and wonder in the poet's heart.
3. Unity with the Universe:
The poet feels emotionally and spiritually connected with everything—trees, stars, sky, even
grass.
4. Imagination and the Inward Eye:
Through imagination, the poet sees beyond reality and feels the hidden life within nature.
5. Sensitivity to Beauty and Life:
The poet develops a deep sensitivity, where even the smallest parts of nature seem alive and
meaningful.

Conclusion:
In “A Walk by Moonlight,” Derozio beautifully describes how a simple walk under the moon
opens the door to deep thoughts, emotions, and spiritual awakening. Nature is not just seen—it is
felt. The poet finds beauty, meaning, and connection all around him. The moonlight leads him to
realize that even the smallest part of nature holds life and deserves respect. This poem shows that
true wisdom and peace come when we open our hearts to the world around us.

"HOW THE CORONAVIRUS SPARKED A WAVE OF INNOVATION IN INDIA" by

Sreevas Sahasranamam

About the Author:

Sreevas Sahasranamam is an Indian writer, journalist, and entrepreneur with a keen interest in
technology, innovation, and socio-economic developments in India. He has contributed articles
on various topics, including the impacts of technological advancements, innovation in business,
and the socio-political landscape in India. Sahasranamam’s writings often focus on the
intersection of modernity and traditional practices, particularly in the context of Indian society.
His work provides insightful commentary on how global challenges, such as the pandemic, can
trigger significant shifts in local industries and foster innovation.

About the Text

The text, "How the Coronavirus Sparked a Wave of Innovation in India" by Sreevas
Sahasranamam, explores the various innovations that emerged in response to the challenges
posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. It highlights how the people of India swiftly adapted and
responded to the crisis, focusing on the numerous technical innovations that helped tackle the
virus. This period also fostered a frugal mindset, where people found creative solutions to
problems using limited resources.

Summary
This chapter discusses the innovations that spurred India’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Across the country, entrepreneurs and innovators quickly developed apps, robots, and ventilators
to help overcome the crisis. Startups incubated by universities have been at the forefront of these
developments, demonstrating a proactive approach to crowdsourcing ideas and solving urgent
humanitarian challenges.

The pandemic led to the widespread use of new terms like social distancing, contact tracing, and
quarantine, and efforts were focused on preventing the virus from spreading in public spaces
such as airports and bus stations. For instance, a Kerala-based startup, Asimov Robotics,
deployed robots in public spaces to dispense hand sanitizers and educate people about the virus.

These robots were also used in hospital isolation wards to carry food and medicines to patients.
The Indian government launched the COVID-19 tracking app, Aarogya Setu, which uses GPS
and Bluetooth technology to inform people about areas with a high risk of virus transmission.
The app was made mandatory for public use, particularly while traveling. Other services, such as
Practo and Klinic, offered online consultations and home testing for COVID-19.

Low-cost, portable ventilators were developed, particularly for use in rural areas, and public
updates and regulations were disseminated via SMS in multiple languages. Drones were also
employed to monitor public spaces, deliver medical supplies, and conduct temperature checks
using thermal imaging.

In addition to medical solutions, the government initiated a COVID-19 Solution Challenge,

attracting a large number of innovative ideas. A startup incubator called BreakCorona received
over 1300 ideas and 180 product solutions in just two days. A portal named Coronasafe-
Network provided essential details, tools, and precautions to the public.

Themes in the Essay

1. Innovation in Crisis: The essay emphasizes how the COVID-19 pandemic led to a surge
in innovation across India. Faced with the crisis, people utilized their creativity to
develop practical solutions, such as apps, robots, and ventilators, to mitigate the effects of
the virus.
2. Technological Advancements: A major theme is the rapid technological advancements
during the pandemic. Technology played a critical role in combating the virus, including
through robots used for sanitation and medical supply delivery, as well as the
development of tracking and consultation apps.
3. Humanitarian Response and Proactive Solutions: The essay also highlights the
humanitarian spirit during the pandemic. Innovators, entrepreneurs, and startups quickly
offered practical solutions, working in collaboration with the government to fight the
virus and improve public health.
4. Frugality and Resourcefulness: The theme of resourcefulness is evident in how
individuals and organizations came up with cost-effective, low-tech solutions like
portable ventilators, showcasing the importance of frugality in times of limited resources.
5. Collaboration and Crowdsourcing: The essay illustrates the importance of
collaboration and crowdsourcing in innovation. Platforms like the COVID-19 Solution
Challenge and BreakCorona enabled people to come together and share ideas,
demonstrating the power of collective action in solving global challenges.

Conclusion
The country witnessed an extreme outburst in the field of technology, driven by necessity. This
surge in innovation created a wave of entrepreneurial activity that needs to be sustained and
enhanced. The pandemic reinforced the saying, "necessity is the mother of innovation."

UNIT-7

“A DIFFERENT HISTORY” by Sujata Bhatt

About the Poet:

Sujata Bhatt (born 1956) is an Indian poet who writes primarily in English, although she also
writes in Gujarati. Bhatt's poetry reflects themes of identity, displacement, and the complexities
of post-colonial experience. As someone who has lived in multiple countries, her work
frequently explores the cultural and linguistic tensions that come with being a part of the Indian
diaspora. Bhatt's poetry is known for its emotional depth, vivid imagery, and exploration of the
intersection between language, culture, and history.

About the Poem:

"A Different History" by Sujata Bhatt reflects on the themes of cultural identity, colonialism, and
the complex relationship between language, heritage, and respect. Through the use of vivid
imagery and metaphor, the poem highlights the contrasts between India’s rich cultural traditions
and the imposition of foreign influences, especially colonial languages. Bhatt explores the
paradox of how the oppressed may come to embrace the very language used to dominate them,
while also emphasizing the importance of respecting books, trees, and knowledge.

Summary and Explanation of the Poem:

Stanza 1: "Great Pan is not dead;

he simply emigrated
to India."

In the first stanza, the speaker begins by introducing "Great Pan," a reference to the Greek god
associated with nature. The phrase "he simply emigrated to India" symbolizes how foreign
influences have found a place in India, blending into the local culture and customs. Pan’s "death"
represents the idea of foreign cultures that seem to have faded but still remain active in some
form.

Stanza 2: "Here, the gods roam freely,

disguised as snakes or monkeys;
every tree is sacred
and it is a sin
to be rude to a book."

The second stanza shifts to describe the sacredness of nature in India, where gods take the form
of sacred animals like snakes and monkeys. Trees are also seen as sacred, reflecting India’s
deep-rooted reverence for nature. The poem further emphasizes the cultural importance of
respect for knowledge, declaring it a sin to treat books disrespectfully, which highlights the
spiritual connection to learning and wisdom.

Stanza 3: "It is a sin to shove a book aside

with your foot,
a sin to slam books down
hard on a table,
a sin to toss one carelessly
across a room."

The third stanza expands on the reverence for books, stressing that mistreating them is a grave
act. The act of shoving a book aside with one’s foot or slamming it down is described as sinful,
emphasizing the cultural value placed on knowledge and its preservation. This reverence for
books is tied to the broader respect for knowledge and spiritual awareness in Indian culture.

Stanza 4: "You must learn how to turn the pages gently

without disturbing Sarasvati,
without offending the tree
from whose wood the paper was made."

The fourth stanza introduces Sarasvati, the goddess of wisdom, who must not be disturbed while
turning the pages of a book. This metaphor reinforces the idea that books are not just objects, but
sacred vessels of wisdom that must be handled with care and respect. The reference to the tree
from which the paper was made links the respect for books to the reverence of nature.

Stanza 5: "Which language

has not been the oppressor’s tongue?
Which language
truly meant to murder someone?"

In this stanza, the poet shifts to the theme of language, questioning which language has not been
used by oppressors to subjugate others. The idea of language as a tool of violence is introduced,
suggesting that all languages, to some extent, have been wielded by colonizers or conquerors as
instruments of power and domination.

Stanza 6: "And how does it happen

that after the torture,
after the soul has been cropped
with a long scythe swooping out
of the conqueror’s face –
the unborn grandchildren
grow to love that strange language."

The final stanza addresses the paradox of colonialism. Despite the violence and oppression
associated with the language of the conqueror, future generations come to embrace that very
language. This reflects the complex relationship between colonized people and the languages
imposed on them, where the oppressed eventually grow to see the language as their own, despite
its brutal history.

Themes in the Poem:

1. Colonialism and Language: The poem critiques the role of language as an instrument of
colonial oppression. It explores how languages, particularly those imposed by colonizers,
can become tools of subjugation, even as future generations begin to identify with and
embrace them, despite their violent origins.
2. Cultural Identity and Heritage: The poem highlights the importance of cultural
identity, especially in the context of language. Bhatt emphasizes the sacredness of local
traditions, such as the reverence for books and nature, which are integral to preserving
cultural heritage. However, colonialism complicates this by forcing a foreign language
and culture into the fabric of the oppressed society.
3. Respect and Reverence: Throughout the poem, there is an underlying theme of respect
—for books, for nature, and for the wisdom that books represent. This respect contrasts
with the brutality of colonization, which is depicted as a violent force that seeks to erase
or replace indigenous cultures and languages.
4. The Paradox of Embracing Oppression: A central theme is the paradox that despite
being forced into a system of linguistic and cultural oppression, the future generations
come to love and adopt the language of the oppressor. This highlights the complex
emotional and psychological effects of colonization, where the tools of oppression
become normalized or even embraced by those who were once victims.

Conclusion:

"A Different History" by Sujata Bhatt is a thought-provoking poem that explores the intricate
relationship between language, colonialism, and cultural identity. Through its vivid imagery and
insightful reflections, the poem critiques the legacy of colonialism and the paradoxical love that
future generations may feel for the language of their oppressors. Bhatt encourages readers to
reflect on the complex nature of cultural survival and the ways in which colonization continues
to shape identities, even in seemingly contradictory ways.

"NOBEL LECTURE 7 DECEMBER (EXTRACT)" by Toni Morrison

About the Author:

Toni Morrison (1931–2019) was an American novelist, essayist, editor, and professor, widely
regarded as one of the most important and influential writers of the 20th century. She was the
first African American woman to win the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1993. Morrison's works
explore the African American experience, delving into themes of identity, race, history, and the
complexities of human emotion. Her most notable works include Beloved, Song of Solomon, and
The Bluest Eye, which reflect her deep engagement with the legacy of slavery, cultural memory,
and the struggle for personal and communal freedom.

Morrison’s writing is known for its lyrical prose, powerful imagery, and emotional depth. Her
work challenges social injustices and highlights the significance of storytelling in shaping
individual and collective identities. Morrison’s contribution to literature transcends boundaries,
resonating with readers across the world for her exploration of universal themes and her ability
to speak truth to power.

About the Lecture:

Toni Morrison delivered her Nobel Prize acceptance speech on December 7, 1993, in Stockholm,
Sweden. In this speech, she explores the role of language in shaping society, the power of
storytelling, and the responsibility of writers. Through an allegorical tale, she discusses how
language can be a tool for oppression or liberation, and how writers must preserve the integrity
of language to reflect the complexities of the human condition. Morrison reflects on her work as
a writer and addresses the importance of the written word in creating meaningful change in
society.

Summary of "Nobel Lecture 7 December (Extract)":

In her lecture, Morrison begins by recalling a familiar childhood phrase, "Once upon a time," and
uses it as a starting point for a story about an old, blind woman who possesses great wisdom.
This woman is visited by some young people who seek to test her wisdom by asking whether the
bird they hold in their hands is alive or dead. The woman, unable to see the bird, responds that it
is in their hands—meaning that the responsibility for its life or death lies with them.

Morrison uses this story as a metaphor for the power and responsibility of language. She
emphasizes that language can be a living, evolving entity that holds power, and when it is
misused, it can be destructive. Morrison critiques how language has been used as a tool of
control and oppression throughout history, particularly by those in positions of power. She also
highlights the importance of keeping language alive, adaptable, and free from censorship, so that
it can serve as a means of communication, expression, and change.

Morrison reflects on how oppressive regimes use language to manipulate people, suppress
dissent, and perpetuate systems of dominance. For her, language that is stifled or corrupted is a
form of violence that limits knowledge and creativity. She asserts that language, when used
properly, has the potential to challenge societal norms and bring about change.

She concludes by exploring the limitations of language and its inability to fully capture the
depths of human experience—such as war, slavery, and death. However, Morrison suggests that
it is through language that we can strive for understanding, build connections, and engage in
meaningful discourse.

Themes in the Lecture:

 1. Language as Power: Morrison emphasizes the importance of language as a tool that can
either empower or oppress. She highlights how language is central to shaping societies
and the ways in which power is exercised.
2. Responsibility and Accountability: The old woman's response to the young people's
question signifies that individuals are responsible for the consequences of their actions,
including the use or misuse of language. Language is in our hands, and we must use it
responsibly.
3. Oppression and Censorship: Morrison critiques the use of language to control, silence,
and oppress people. She discusses how governments, media, and other institutions
manipulate language to maintain power and privilege, often at the expense of
marginalized groups.
4. The Value of Diverse Narratives: Morrison challenges the idea of a singular, dominant
language or narrative. She suggests that multiple perspectives and voices enrich the
understanding of the world and that we must embrace linguistic and cultural diversity.
5. The Role of the Writer: The lecture emphasizes the writer’s role in preserving language
and using it to explore and expose the complexities of human life. Morrison argues that
writers must ensure that language is not only alive but also capable of reflecting the truth
and generating new ideas.

Conclusion:

Toni Morrison’s Nobel Lecture serves as a profound reflection on the role of language in shaping
our understanding of the world. She stresses that language is not just a means of communication
but a tool that can either support or undermine the human spirit. By using language thoughtfully
and responsibly, writers can inspire change, challenge oppressive systems, and create
connections between people.

Morrison calls on individuals, especially writers, to be conscious of how they use language, to
reject oppressive forms of discourse, and to embrace language as a living force capable of
articulating the complexities of the human experience. The lecture is a powerful reminder of the
importance of storytelling, the necessity of maintaining language’s vitality, and the responsibility
each of us has in shaping the world through the words we use.

UNIT-8

“LADY MACBETH’S SPEECH FROM MACBETH ACT 1, SCENE 5” by William

Shakespeare

About the Poet:

William Shakespeare (1564–1616) was an English playwright, poet, and actor, widely regarded
as one of the greatest writers in the English language and world literature. His extensive body of
work includes tragedies, comedies, histories, and sonnets, with Macbeth being one of his most
famous tragedies. Known for his complex characters and exploration of universal themes like
ambition, power, love, and betrayal, Shakespeare’s works continue to be celebrated for their
profound impact on literature, theater, and the English language. Macbeth is one of
Shakespeare’s darkest plays, exploring the corrupting effects of unchecked ambition.

About the Poem/Passage:

The passage from Macbeth in Act 1, Scene 5 is not a standalone poem, but rather an excerpt
from one of Shakespeare’s most famous tragedies. This speech is delivered by Lady Macbeth
after she reads a letter from her husband, Macbeth, detailing his encounter with the three witches
and their prophecy that he will become the King of Scotland. The speech marks a pivotal
moment in the play, as Lady Macbeth reveals her intense ambition and determination to push her
husband to commit murder in order to seize the throne. This speech is key to understanding Lady
Macbeth’s character, as it exposes her ruthlessness and the lengths she is willing to go to in order
to achieve power.

Background:

Macbeth is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare, likely first performed in 1606. Set in
Scotland, the play follows Macbeth, a noble warrior who, after receiving a prophecy from three
witches, becomes consumed with ambition. The witches predict that Macbeth will be crowned
King of Scotland, which spurs him to murder King Duncan in order to seize the throne. Although
initially hesitant, Macbeth is persuaded to commit the regicide by his wife, Lady Macbeth. As
Macbeth’s reign progresses, he becomes increasingly paranoid, committing further atrocities to
secure his power, eventually leading to his downfall.

Lady Macbeth is a key figure in the play, playing a pivotal role in encouraging Macbeth to
murder Duncan and take the throne. However, she is also consumed by guilt, and her eventual
descent into madness shows the consequences of their actions. Her speech in Act 1, Scene 5
reveals her ambition and her willingness to push Macbeth to achieve power at any cost, setting
the stage for the tragic events that follow.

Summary and Explanation of Lady Macbeth’s Speech from Act 1, Scene 5:

In this speech, Lady Macbeth learns of her husband’s encounter with the witches and the
prophecy that Macbeth will be king. Macbeth is eager but hesitant, struggling with the moral
implications of killing King Duncan to make the prophecy come true. Lady Macbeth, however,
immediately resolves to push him toward action, revealing her own ambition and ruthlessness.

She expresses concern that Macbeth, although ambitious, is “too full o' the milk of human
kindness” to do what is necessary to become king. She fears that Macbeth lacks the cruelty and
moral fortitude required to murder Duncan and take the throne. She believes that while he desires
greatness, he would prefer to achieve it through honorable means rather than through deceit and
murder.
Lady Macbeth then calls upon dark forces to rid her of compassion and fill her with the cruelty
necessary to carry out the murder. She wishes to be “unsexed,” seeking to strip herself of her
feminine qualities, which she associates with weakness, and to embrace the ruthlessness she
believes will be needed to succeed.

She further plans to manipulate Macbeth into following through with the murder, saying she will
“pour my spirits in thine ear” to encourage him to act without hesitation. She intends to use her
words to “chastise with the valour of my tongue” any doubts or moral qualms he may have. Lady
Macbeth is determined to ensure that Macbeth will take the path of ambition and murder, even if
it means sacrificing his soul for power. This speech reveals her as a deeply ambitious and
manipulative figure, willing to do whatever it takes to see her husband crowned king.

Themes in the Speech:

1. Ambition and Power: Lady Macbeth’s speech highlights the destructive power of
ambition. She is consumed by her desire for power, and she sees Macbeth’s ambition as
the key to achieving it. Her determination to ensure Macbeth acts without hesitation
underscores the corrupting influence of ambition in the play.
2. Gender and Power: In her plea to be “unsexed,” Lady Macbeth expresses her belief that
women are perceived as weaker and more nurturing, while men are associated with
strength and power. She wishes to rid herself of these perceived feminine traits to
embrace the cruelty she believes is necessary to achieve power.
3. Manipulation and Control: Throughout the speech, Lady Macbeth’s role as the
manipulative force behind Macbeth is evident. She seeks to control him and make him
follow through with the murder, using her influence to manipulate his actions. Her
determination to push Macbeth toward committing regicide shows her control over him,
particularly at this early stage of the play.
4. Moral Corruption and Guilt: Lady Macbeth’s willingness to call upon dark forces and
rid herself of compassion reflects her moral corruption. She sees no problem with using
evil means to achieve her goals, and this foreshadows the psychological torment and guilt
that will eventually consume both her and Macbeth.

Conclusion:

Lady Macbeth’s speech in Act 1, Scene 5 is a crucial turning point in Macbeth, as it reveals her
ambitious, manipulative, and ruthless character. Her desire for power and her willingness to go
to any lengths to see her husband crowned king are central to the play’s unfolding tragedy. This
speech introduces key themes such as ambition, gender roles, and moral corruption, and it
establishes Lady Macbeth as one of Shakespeare’s most powerful and complex female
characters. Through her speech, Lady Macbeth becomes an agent of ambition and dark desire,
setting the stage for the horrific events that will follow.

"HOW I BECAME A PUBLIC SPEAKER (ABRIDGE)" by George Bernard Shaw

About the Author:

George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950) was an Irish playwright, critic, and polemicist who became
one of the most significant and influential writers in the English-speaking world. Known for his
wit, humor, and social commentary, Shaw authored numerous plays that challenged social
conventions, often addressing issues such as class, marriage, education, and political ideologies.
His best-known works include Pygmalion, Saint Joan, and Man and Superman. Shaw was
awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1925 for his contributions to drama, particularly his
ability to present complex social issues through compelling characters and dialogue. A self-
described socialist, Shaw used his writing to critique the social and political systems of his time,
advocating for reform and progress.

About the Essay:

In his autobiographical essay "How I Became a Public Speaker", George Bernard Shaw
humorously recounts the journey of how he trained himself to become a proficient public
speaker. The essay explores Shaw’s initial lack of confidence, his early experiences with public
speaking, and the development of his oratorical skills over time. Shaw gives a candid and often
amusing account of the trials and challenges he faced in learning the art of public speaking,
while also highlighting the techniques that helped him succeed.

Summary of "How I Became a Public Speaker":

Shaw begins the essay by recalling his first experience attending a Zetetical meeting with his
friend Lecky. At the time, Shaw had never spoken in public and was entirely unfamiliar with the
structure and nature of public meetings. Despite this, he was confident in his knowledge and felt
assured of his ability to speak. However, his first attempt at speaking in the debate turned out to
be a disaster. He spoke foolishly, made a poor impression, and felt deeply ashamed. This
experience led him to join the debating society, determined to improve his public speaking skills.

In subsequent meetings, Shaw took the initiative to take the chair and speak, reading extensively
from the works of influential writers like Stuart Mill, Darwin, and George Eliot. He also
prepared notes to guide his speeches and participated in debates at University College. Through
this constant practice and engagement, Shaw’s nervousness gradually disappeared, and his
speaking skills began to improve.

Shaw eventually became a socialist orator, delivering his first lecture titled “Thieves”. He spoke
extemporaneously, without relying on notes, and gained recognition for his impromptu speaking
style. Shaw was known for speaking wherever and whenever he was invited, and he made it a
point to accept every speaking engagement, no matter how small or unconventional. One of his
most memorable speeches was delivered in Hyde Park, London, during a torrential downpour,
with only six policemen and his secretary present to listen. Despite the circumstances, Shaw
spoke for more than an hour.

Shaw’s commitment to free speech was evident in his refusal to accept payment for speaking
engagements, although the Sunday Societies offered him a fee on the condition that he avoid
controversial topics like politics and religion. Shaw, however, insisted on speaking about these
very subjects and only agreed to be paid the cost of his third-class railway ticket. This gave him
the freedom to speak on the topics he was passionate about.

His experience as a public speaker also provided him with important skills for political work,
such as the "committee habit" and "platform technique." One notable example of his platform
technique occurred at a meeting in St. James’ Hall, London, where Shaw’s opponent attempted
to undermine him. Shaw deftly used his public speaking skills to provoke a reaction, leading to a
chaotic scene in which the opponent’s supporters rushed the platform, causing the meeting to
break up. However, the meeting was reorganized, and Shaw once again took the stage, emerging
victorious. Shaw also famously defeated H.G. Wells in a debate, demonstrating his skillful use of
the techniques he had developed through years of public speaking practice.

Themes in the Essay:

1. Self-Improvement and Determination: Shaw’s journey of self-training in public

speaking highlights the importance of persistence and self-improvement. His
determination to overcome nervousness and his commitment to constant practice are
central to the essay.
2. Freedom of Speech: Shaw’s refusal to accept payment for speaking unless he could talk
about controversial issues like politics and religion underscores his belief in the
importance of speaking freely about societal concerns, regardless of popular opinion.
3. Public Speaking as an Art: Shaw’s emphasis on preparation, platform technique, and
his ability to speak extemporaneously shows how public speaking, like any art, requires
skill, practice, and experience to master.
4. The Power of Debate: The essay highlights the role of public speaking and debating in
shaping public opinion and influencing societal change. Shaw’s debates with figures like
H.G. Wells demonstrate the intellectual rigor involved in public discourse.
5. Humor and Wit: Shaw’s humorous and self-deprecating tone in recounting his early
speaking experiences reveals his ability to use wit to engage his audience. His anecdotes
of speaking in unusual situations also reflect his playful approach to the challenges of
public speaking.

Conclusion:

In "How I Became a Public Speaker", George Bernard Shaw provides a lighthearted yet
insightful look into the process of becoming a skilled orator. His story demonstrates that with
persistence, practice, and a willingness to embrace challenges, anyone can develop the
confidence and ability to speak in public. Shaw’s journey is a testament to the value of free
expression and the power of public speaking as a tool for both personal growth and societal
impact. His humorous account of overcoming his initial nervousness offers inspiration to anyone
looking to improve their own speaking abilities.