Sustainability 15 07877 With Cover
Sustainability 15 07877 With Cover
Review
Dian Permata Sari Mashari, Teuku Yuri M. Zagloel, Tri Edhi Budhi Soesilo and Istiana Maftuchah
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107877
sustainability
Review
A Bibliometric and Literature Review: Alignment of Green
Finance and Carbon Trading
Dian Permata Sari Mashari 1, *, Teuku Yuri M. Zagloel 2 , Tri Edhi Budhi Soesilo 1 and Istiana Maftuchah 3
Abstract: The issue of climate change is highly related to carbon emissions. One of the practical
efforts to reduce carbon emissions is through carbon trading and offset mechanisms. Implementing
carbon trading demands massive funding allocation, which requires sustainable financial policy
arrangements from the government and the private sector as an instrument to support nationally
determined contributions under the Paris Agreement. However, only a few review articles look
into the specific combination of green finance (also known as sustainable financing) and the carbon
trading mechanism. In this study, we aim to review research on green finance and its association
to the emission reduction and carbon trading. We utilized the VOSviewer framework to perform a
bibliometric analysis on the Scopus database, and performed search, identification, and screening
processes using selected relevant keywords. We obtained 506 articles from 2014 to 2022 related to
sustainable finance and carbon trading aspects. Using rigorous bibliometric approaches, we identified
both established and recent research clusters for topological analysis, identification of major research
subjects, interdependencies, and trends in collaborative effort. The results indicate that there is ample
room for additional research to link carbon trading with green finance initiatives or financing, which
can improve the success of carbon trading activities.
Keywords: sustainable finance; green finance; carbon trading; emission trading system; emission;
Citation: Mashari, D.P.S.; Zagloel, sustainable economic growth; environmental protection; literature review; bibliometric analysis
T.Y.M.; Soesilo, T.E.B.; Maftuchah, I.
A Bibliometric and Literature Review:
Alignment of Green Finance and
Carbon Trading. Sustainability 2023, 1. Introduction
15, 7877. https://doi.org/10.3390/
Global warming significantly contributes to global climate change, and reducing
su15107877
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is necessary to avoid the most catastrophic effects of
Academic Editor: David K. Ding global warming. By adopting the COP-21 of the United Nations Framework Convention
Received: 20 February 2023
on Climate Change (UNFCCC) via the Paris Agreement, officials worldwide agreed that
Revised: 25 March 2023
the average global temperature should not exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial
Accepted: 17 April 2023
levels. The financial issue has gained a major position as a result of the recent COP-27. It
Published: 11 May 2023 was stated during the COP-27 conference that a substantial increase in financial resources
is required to facilitate the implementation of actions outlined in the nationally determined
contributions (NDCs) and long-term strategies. Recent progress in this regard has been
observed in the financial sector, where portfolios have been adjusted to support the transi-
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. tion to a net zero economy, but more must be done to leverage the trillions necessary to
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. implement low-emission, climate-resilient development pathways. All parties are now
This article is an open access article genuinely concerned with greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction via a financial stimulus, which
distributed under the terms and makes the situation captivating.
conditions of the Creative Commons In the last decade, researchers and policymakers have also become greatly interested
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
in analyzing the role of ecology and finance. There is a need to synergize multidisciplinary
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
knowledge and expertise to combat climate change. The higher the population, the higher
4.0/).
carbon trading. There are several terms used to depict the actual meaning of green finance,
such as “sustainable finance”, “environmental finance”, “climate finance” and “green
investment” [13]. For alignment purposes, we utilize the terms “sustainable finance”,
“green finance” and “carbon finance” to refer to financing support for the purpose of
decarbonization. IFC (2009) described green finance as investment solutions that protect the
environment, promote social justice, and stimulate economic growth [14]. There has been a
significant increase in financial institutions worldwide beginning to implement and adopt
lending systems, policies and practices to reduce businesses’ environmental, social and
economic impact. Financial institutions (banks) play an important role as intermediaries to
absorb, allocate and distribute idle funds in society for economic growth [15,16].
Article 6 of the Paris Agreement is the key tool to boost climate ambition by governing
the carbon market. It mobilizes resources to allow countries and companies to actualize
the low-carbon transition, and hence, be able to achieve the goal of net zero emissions
in the most effective way. Several academics have conducted studies indicating that the
purpose of green finance is to finance green companies, assist in the improvement of
environmental quality, and encourage technical innovation in green sectors. It has also been
demonstrated that green money may significantly contribute to emission reductions [17–19].
GHG reduction may be pursued through a variety of methods. A carbon price mechanism
is one of the most economical means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Under a
carbon pricing system, governments impose a cost on businesses and other entities that
emit significant amounts of CO2 in order to provide an economic incentive to reduce such
pollution. Carbon pricing can be implemented in multiple ways. A survey of policy practice
categorized carbon pricing mechanisms as falling into three main types: cap and trade
emission trading systems, carbon taxation and hybrid systems that blend taxation and
emission trading schemes [20]. Under an emission trading scheme (ETS), the government
sets a cap on emissions or emission intensity, and then issues allowances to firms that can
choose to sell their allowances to firms with higher abatement costs or use the allowances
for a set period of time before surrendering them back to the government. Typically, the
government gives primary allowances to regulated industries for free or sells them at
auction to establish a base price.
This paper aims to review the literature that discusses the extent to which green
finance or sustainable finance has been a potential factor to speed up the implementation
of cap-and-trade (carbon trading). The literature review is ultimately aimed at identifying
the lack of information on how green finance can take place to support the carbon market.
This article will address the following research questions:
a. What is the trend in the number of publications within the research field?
b. Which nations, organizations, publications, subject areas, and writers are most promi-
nent in the current research field?
c. What are the main research directions in the current field?
d. How effective is the development of studies on the application of green finance in
carbon trading transactions in reducing emissions?
The structure of this paper is as follows. Following the introduction, the second sec-tion
reviews the literature on the transformation of carbon trading, as well as the integra-tion of
green finance (or sustainable finance and climate finance). The third section dis-cusses the
analytical method used and the bibliometrics as part of a systematic literature review, along
with the structure of the keyword search filtering used. The fourth section discusses the
search results and the network analysis using VOSViewer, as well as key-words, countries,
and methods used in the selected articles.
Figure 2 depicts how the various components of sustainable finance relate to one
another in an illustrative manner. Figure 2, which is presented in a slightly different
manner than Figure 1, places an emphasis on the participation of governance as an essential
component in order to create a sustainable ecosystem.
Figure 2. The components and dimensions of sustainable finance (Cambridge Institute Sustainability
Leadership, 2022 [24]).
Sustainability 2023, 15, 7877 5 of 18
The framework set out in the Paris Agreement and the SDGs can be utilized as an
appropriate parameter to mitigate and adapt to climate change in relation to sustainable
financing [23,24]. Through the SDGs and the Paris Agreement, the global framework now
leads to sustainable development that focuses on environmental protection and its relation
to financial mobilization. A moderately novel concept in financial and environmental
issues, sustainable finance, plays a crucial role in supporting the transition to a greener
transformation in both industrialized and developing nations [25].
This section aims to disclose how the review procedures and processes specific to our
research topic were performed. The objective of this research is to develop linguistic bridges
between the literature on sustainable finance and carbon trading. To address the limitations
of narrative reviews, this paper uses a systematic literature review to obtain all relevant and
available research on green finance and carbon trading [26]. A literature review is a research
synthesis conducted by review groups with specialized skills to identify, retrieve, appraise,
and synthesize a body of literature [27]. It follows a predefined and rigorous process to
ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the results. This literature review integrates
quantitative and qualitative evaluation through bibliometrics and content analysis.
The framework that was utilized for the approach is depicted in Figure 3. This
framework begins with the selection of the literature that is tailored to the search criteria,
followed by the quantitative and qualitative analysis of this literature, in order to arrive at
findings and conclusions.
researchers in the discipline. These indicators are traditionally calculated by using the
number of times other researchers cite their scholarly publications. Journal-level metrics
quantified the impact of a journal in a particular field. They calculate how many articles
are published per year and how many citations use articles published in that journal. The
data will be summarized in line and pie charts for visual aid.
The text mining software VOSviewer was adopted for science mapping. VOSviewer
is a comprehensive bibliometric analysis tool based on the visualization of similarities
(VOS) technology, which has unique advantages in clustering fragmented knowledge from
different domains according to their similarity and relatedness. In the visualized networks,
a node signifies a particular bibliographic item, such as an organization, country, keyword,
or reference. The node size represents the counting of the evaluated item, i.e., a citation or
occurrence. Links denote the co-citation, co-occurrence, or collaboration relationship. The
software automatically calculates the total link strength (TLS) metric to reflect the degree
of correlation between any two produced nodes. The greater the TLS value, the greater
the significance and centrality of the item. Nodes with a high degree of similarity were
clustered and were distinguishable from other clusters by color, whilst nodes with a low
degree of similarity were separated as much as feasible.
As previously stated, the year 2014 was chosen due to the ratification of the Paris
Agreement. The Paris Agreement was the first-ever universal, legally binding global climate
change agreement, adopted at the Paris climate conference (COP21). Since then, research
on the topics of green finance and carbon trading has been significantly increasing year
by year. Green finance and carbon trading roles are essential for climate action. Therefore,
policy makers need to have a better understanding of how to effectively implement them.
three years. It can be deduced from a journal’s CiteScore that the articles it publishes have
a greater impact when the score is higher.
0 10 20 30
Number of Publications
Sustainability published most of the articles related to green finance and carbon trading,
contributing 7.61% of the total articles. It is followed by Environment Science and Pollution
Research (6.92%), Journal of Cleaner Production (3.11%), Journal of Sustainable Finance and
Investment (3.11%), and Business Strategy and Environment (2.42%). Renewable Energy has
the highest CiteScore of 13.6, followed by Business Strategy and the Environment (CS = 11.98)
and Climate Policy (CS = 9.8).
It can be inferred that the research papers related to green finance and carbon trading
are not concentrated in a certain journal or field of study. Both are complex subjects that
require multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches.
Based on Figure 7, the global research of green finance and carbon trading is divided
into three clusters. The first cluster is dominated by European countries (United Kingdom,
Germany, and Italy) and the United States. The second cluster consists of India, Pakistan,
and Russia. China leads the third cluster with Malaysia and Vietnam. The map suggests
that the research collaboration between countries regarding green finance and carbon
trading is influenced by the region. China and Pakistan have collaborated with most
countries except for Germany.
Regarding the organization or the authors’ affiliations, more than 90% of them only
published one research paper. There are five notable organizations that contributed to
the research of green finance and carbon trading based on their number of publications,
citations, and link strengths:
• School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081,
China. It has published 4 documents with 183 citations;
• School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Eco-
nomics, Bengbu, 233030, China. It has published 2 documents with 124 citations;
• Department of Economics and Finance, Sunway University Business School, Sunway
University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia. It has published 2 documents with 38 citations;
• School of Economics and Management, Huanghuai University, Zhumadian, 463000,
China. It has published 2 paper with 2 citations;
• School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081,
China. It has published 3 documents with 179 citations.
Sustainability 2023, 15, 7877 12 of 18
Figure 9. Linkage between ‘carbon trading’ and ‘green finance’ author keywords.
Figure 9. Linkage between ‘carbon trading’ and ‘green finance’ author keywords.
Sustainability 2023, 15, 7877 14 of 18
4. Discussion
Our study covers the theoretical underpinnings of the topic determined from the
results and literature evaluation of sample studies. Additionally, it provides a list of the
current research trends, as well as possible topics of research that could be investigated in
the future. Our current research examines the publications that highlight the involvement
of green finance towards carbon trading and carbon emission reduction by employing an
integrative review, which comprises a bibliometric analysis and manual literature review
of a sample of 184 relevant articles. This review is carried out in order to implement an
integrative review. The results of the bibliometric show the interesting fact that only a
few documents or journals discussed and explored the implementation of green finance
in carbon trading. The literature review performed unveils a substantial finding on the
importance of sustainable finance or climate finance with respect to its involvement to
support carbon emission reduction. Based on the analysis conducted by Claudius and Betz
(2018), the EU Transaction Log data reveal that it is more suitable to associate extended
organizations with long trading knowledge and practices with the financial services sector,
including banking [5]. In executing carbon trading, financial institutions can play the follow-
ing roles: (a) Acting as intermediary institutions in carbon trading transactions with broker
specialization; (b) Offering additional services by managing accounts directly; (c) Providing
relevant market information to customers through the publication of newspapers or market
analysis reports; (d) Acting as a market maker by continuously carrying out supply and
demand on the exchange in a particular price corridor; (e) Making transactions through a
company’s account to acquire profit; (f) Borrowing a company’s quota and returning it at
interest (using it as speculative capital); (g) Assisting in exchanging carbon quotas with
certified emission reductions (CERs) or emission reduction units (ERUs) by selling carbon
quotas and buying CERs/ERUs annually; (h) Acting as an aggregator by collecting the
excess quota of customers and selling it on the market; (i) Becoming the leading hedging
partner in which the bank has a role in developing and offering derivative products to
manage price risk for regulated companies.
In general, the theory of emission trading focuses on the trading activities of regulated
organizations. In reality, however, non-regulated entities also actively participate in the
emission allowances market. They frequently serve as intermediaries and can enhance
market efficiency by reducing transaction costs [29]. In our bibliometric analysis and
systematic literature review, we observed that the role of the financial sector in commodity
markets in general and in emissions trading in particular is underexplored, and there
appears to be a lack of research into the roles that banks play in these markets. In order
to better comprehend the significance of financial institutions (such as banks) involved in
EU emission trading, particularly as trading partners of companies governed by current
emission trading schemes, we consider it necessary to conduct a survey analysis.
The carbon market is a compliance market in which the original seller or issuer of the
product is the government (i.e., carbon allowances). Therefore, the market lacks typical
sellers who would act as counterparties for buyers seeking to hedge against the rising
prices of allowances [30].
According to the several studies that have been reviewed, there are findings that imply
that financial development plays a fundamental role in the mitigation of emissions. In
theory, financial function and its development include capitalization, the involvement of
technology, and implementation of regulations with respect to environmental protection
and earning/generation of value and income. That said, with some assistance from more
developed countries that have attained high financial development to improve environ-
mental performance, it is expected that other developing countries would be benefited by
policymakers as a reminder of how important it is to take into consideration financial as-
pects and their development to protect the environment for both developed and developing
nations [31,32]. In addition, Geddes et al. (2020) also implied that the role of government
in executing the financial policy is crucial [33]. Furthermore, Wang, Y and Zhi, Q (2016)
emphasized that the concept of green finance is still at the theoretical level, and therefore, it
Sustainability 2023, 15, 7877 15 of 18
is essential for researchers to explore more and analyze how to reduce environmental risks
through more sustainable financing by refining existing traditional financing mechanisms
and supporting the development of the renewable energy industry [34].
We further noticed that there are several challenges and opportunities to improve
financial sustainability and highlight the already attained actions. Marx (2020) affirms
that managing the obstacles demands an influential political will, with an engagement
plan that will be performed [35]. In this case, proper coordination is required at both the
global and regional levels, such as a centralized distribution system on an environmentally
sustainable economic movement, the so-called taxonomy. Based on some studies we have
examined [36–38], we have summarized the following conditions that are also imperative
to bring about: (i) Regulations that acknowledge the association of sustainable investments
and sustainability risks, including the disclosure of how institutions and the government
combine environmental, social, and governance factors in their risk management process;
(ii) Public and private businesses and funding are highly required; (iii) Multidisciplinary
experts to solve the complicated dilemmas of climate change, but also poverty and other
SDGs; and (iv) A competitive market to guarantee efficient resource allocation would also
be imperative for thriving carbon trading actions [36–38].
We specifically note that in formulating policies related to carbon trading mechanisms,
governments must determine appropriate and targeted criteria to provide necessary carbon
“credits” to companies that acquire these emissions. This mechanism requires account-
ability and transparency, including disclosing information from governments on which
companies or industry players are releasing carbon emissions and detailed transaction
figures. Accountability and transparency will prevent the possibility of under-the-table
transactions between government actors and companies that release carbon emissions.
With a better future projection of carbon trading or a carbon market, clear and straight
regulations that can underlie and support its implementation are required. It is also possible
for the government to become involved by enacting policies that evaluate the corporation’s
financial and operational requirements and encourage green and sustainable investments
in emission reduction measures. For instance, governments might take into consideration
putting in place systems for carbon trading (and/or carbon taxes). This may increase aware-
ness among investors, lenders, and financial service providers for market segmentation,
and it may also assist in flexible implementation by financial institutions and investors,
thereby keeping policy risks (such as stricter environmental policy) relatively low, and
making green investments attractive to a wider range of stakeholders [39].
further research is required to justify the validity of the opinion. Through this study, it
is anticipated that both private institutions that provide the market for the green finance
industry and institutions that regulate the governance of the market in a broader context
of the creation of economic sustainability and environmental protection will gain a better
understanding of the condition of a number of countries engaging in carbon trading and
its green finance policy. With clear information advantages, more opportunities will be
provided to researchers and it is anticipated that the international collaboration between
developing and developed nations will increase. This study will also be of great use to
a number of stakeholders directly involved in the implementation of green finance and
carbon trading policies, as it will present potential findings regarding the development
of research on green finance and carbon trading. Despite the fact that the quality of the
articles has been ensured, the quantity of papers is relatively moderate. This is a limitation
of the study that exists due to the fact that the majority of the articles selected for analysis
are derived from the Scopus database. By conducting a manual search on the website, we
were able to locate a number of useful articles originating from different databases other
than Scopus. As a result, making use of multiple databases is something that could be
carried out to make the results more representative for future research.
References
1. Scholtens, B. Why Finance Should Care about Ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2017, 32, 500–505. [CrossRef]
2. Zhang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Managi, S. A Bibliometric Analysis on Green Finance: Current Status, Development, and Future Directions.
Financ. Res. Lett. 2019, 29, 425–430. [CrossRef]
3. Carney, M. Breaking the Tragedy of the Horizon—Climate Change and Financial Stability—Speech by Mark Carney|Bank of
England. BIS Cent. Bank. Speeches. 2015, pp. 1–16. Available online: https://www.bis.org/review/r151009a.pdf (accessed on
1 April 2023).
4. ESRB. Too Late, Too Sudden: Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy and Systemic Risk. Reports of the Advisory Scientific Com-
mittee. 2016. Available online: https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/asc/Reports_ASC_6_1602.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2023).
5. Cludius, J.; Betz, R. EU Emissions Trading: The Role of Banks and Other Financial Actors Insights from the EU Transaction
Log and Interviews. SML Working Paper No. 12. 2016. Available online: https://www.sccer-crest.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/
EPAG_CREST_WP_EUETS_RoleofBanks.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2023).
6. Ren, X.; Dou, Y.; Dong, K.; Li, Y. Information Spillover and Market Connectedness: Multi-Scale Quantile-on-Quantile Analysis of
the Crude Oil and Carbon Markets. Appl. Econ. 2022, 54, 4465–4485. [CrossRef]
7. Walter, K.; Cochu, A.; Georgiev, I.; Eisinger, F.; Hogg, D. Defining “Green” in the Context of Green Finance: Final Report; European
Commission, Directorate-General for Environment: Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
8. Kamra, P.; Grover, T. Green Financing: A Global Investment Transformation. SSRN Electron. J. 2021. [CrossRef]
Sustainability 2023, 15, 7877 17 of 18
9. Guo, M.; Hu, Y.; Yu, J. The Role of Financial Development in the Process of Climate Change: Evidence from Different Panel
Models in China. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2019, 10, 1375–1382. [CrossRef]
10. Zhao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, H. The Impact of Growth, Energy and Financial Development on Environmental Pollution in China:
New Evidence from a Spatial Econometric Analysis. Energy Econ. 2021, 93, 104506. [CrossRef]
11. Le, T.-H.; Le, H.-C.; Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. Does Financial Inclusion Impact CO2 Emissions? Evidence from Asia. Financ. Res. Lett.
2020, 34, 101451. [CrossRef]
12. Labatt, S.; White, R.R. Carbon Finance: The Financial Implications of Climate Change; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011.
13. Akomea-Frimpong, I.; Adeabah, D.; Ofosu, D.; Tenakwah, E.J. A Review of Studies on Green Finance of Banks, Research Gaps
and Future Directions. J. Sustain. Financ. Investig. 2022, 12, 1241–1246. [CrossRef]
14. IFC. Green Finance: A Bottom-up Approach to Track Existing Flows; International Finance Corporation: Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
15. Andreeva, O.V.; Vovchenko, N.G.; Ivanova, O.B.; Kostoglodova, E.D. Green Finance: Trends and Financial Regulation Prospects.
In Contemporary Issues in Business and Financial Management in Eastern Europe; Grima, S., Thalassinos, E., Eds.; Contempo-
rary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis; Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2018; Volume 100, pp. 9–17,
ISBN 978-1-78756-449-7.
16. Fu, J.; Ng, A.W. Green Finance Reform and Innovation for Sustainable Development of the Greater Bay Area: Towards an
Ecosystem for Sustainability. In Sustainable Energy and Green Finance for a Low-carbon Economy: Perspectives from the Greater Bay
Area of China; Spinger: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020.
17. La Rovere, E.L.; Grottera, C.; Wills, W. Overcoming the Financial Barrier to a Low Emission Development Strategy in Brazil. Int.
Econ. 2018, 155, 61–68. [CrossRef]
18. Li, C.; Gan, Y. The Spatial Spillover Effects of Green Finance on Ecological Environment—Empirical Research Based on Spatial
Econometric Model. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 5651–5665. [CrossRef]
19. Saeed Meo, M.; Karim, M.Z.A. The Role of Green Finance in Reducing CO2 Emissions: An Empirical Analysis. Borsa Istanb. Rev.
2022, 22, 169–178. [CrossRef]
20. Narassimhan, E.; Gallagher, K.S.; Koester, S.; Alejo, J.R. Carbon Pricing in Practice: A Review of Existing Emissions Trading
Systems. Clim. Policy 2018, 18, 967–991. [CrossRef]
21. Mielke, J. Signals for 2 ◦ C: The Influence of Policies, Market Factors and Civil Society Actions on Investment Decisions for Green
Infrastructure. J. Sustain. Financ. Investig. 2019, 9, 87–115. [CrossRef]
22. Barua, S.; Chiesa, M. Sustainable Financing Practices through Green Bonds: What Affects the Funding Size? Bus. Strategy Environ.
2019, 28, 1131–1147. [CrossRef]
23. Migliorelli, M.; Dessertine, P. The Rise of Green Finance in Europe: Opportunites and Challenges for Issuers, Investors and Marketplaces;
Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; ISBN 978-3-030-22509-4.
24. Cambridge Institute Sustainability Leadership. From Ethics to Impact: The Emergence of Sustainable Finance; Module 3 Unit 1;
University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 2020.
25. Wang, C.; Li, X.W.; Wen, H.X.; Nie, P.Y. Order Financing for Promoting Green Transition. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 283, 125415.
[CrossRef]
26. Merli, R.; Preziosi, M.; Acampora, A. Sustainability Experiences in the Wine Sector: Toward the Development of an International
Indicators System. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 3791–3805. [CrossRef]
27. Munn, Z.; Peters, M.D.J.; Stern, C.; Tufanaru, C.; McArthur, A.; Aromataris, E. Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance
for Authors When Choosing between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018, 18, 143.
[CrossRef]
28. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan,
S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, 372:n71.
[CrossRef]
29. Stavins, R.N. Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1995, 29, 133–148. [CrossRef]
30. Schneck, J.; Monast, J. Financial Market Reform and the Implications for Carbon Trading; Nicholas Institute: Durham, NC, USA, 2011.
31. Ren, X.; Shao, Q.; Zhong, R. Nexus between Green Finance, Non-Fossil Energy Use, and Carbon Intensity: Empirical Evidence
from China Based on a Vector Error Correction Model. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 122844. [CrossRef]
32. Xie, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Lv, T. A Bibliometric Analysis on Land Degradation: Current Status, Development, and Future
Directions. Land 2020, 9, 28. [CrossRef]
33. Geddes, A.; Schmid, N.; Schmidt, T.S.; Steffen, B. The Politics of Climate Finance: Consensus and Partisanship in Designing Green
State Investment Banks in the United Kingdom and Australia. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020, 69, 101583. [CrossRef]
34. Wang, Y.; Zhi, Q. The Role of Green Finance in Environmental Protection: Two Aspects of Market Mechanism and Policies. Energy
Procedia 2016, 104, 311–316. [CrossRef]
35. Marx, C. Climate Change and Financial Sustainability: A Regulator’s Perspective. ERA Forum 2020, 21, 171–175. [CrossRef]
36. Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Xue, J.; Liu, Y. Evaluation of Effectiveness of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme in Carbon Mitigation.
Energy Econ. 2020, 90, 104872. [CrossRef]
37. Han, Y. Impact of Environmental Regulation Policy on Environmental Regulation Level: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on
Carbon Emission Trading Pilot. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 23602–23615. [CrossRef]
Sustainability 2023, 15, 7877 18 of 18
38. Shen, Y.; Su, Z.W.; Malik, M.Y.; Umar, M.; Khan, Z.; Khan, M. Does Green Investment, Financial Development and Natural
Resources Rent Limit Carbon Emissions? A Provincial Panel Analysis of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142538. [CrossRef]
39. Sharma, G.D.; Verma, M.; Shahbaz, M.; Gupta, M.; Chopra, R. Transitioning Green Finance from Theory to Practice for Renewable
Energy Development. Renew. Energy 2022, 195, 554–565. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.