0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views

IS-11384-2022 Example 001

The document outlines the design and verification of a simply supported composite beam using ETABS and SAFE software, detailing member properties, loading conditions, and technical features tested. Results show a perfect match with independent calculations, indicating the software's reliability for composite beam design. The document includes extensive calculations for flexural strength, shear strength, and deflections, confirming the beam's structural integrity under specified loads.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views

IS-11384-2022 Example 001

The document outlines the design and verification of a simply supported composite beam using ETABS and SAFE software, detailing member properties, loading conditions, and technical features tested. Results show a perfect match with independent calculations, indicating the software's reliability for composite beam design. The document includes extensive calculations for flexural strength, shear strength, and deflections, confirming the beam's structural integrity under specified loads.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

Software Verification

PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE


REVISION NO.: 1

IS-11384-2022 Example-001

INSDAG CHAPTER 22 – PROBLEM 1

EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION

Design a simply supported composite beam with 10m span shown (dotted line) in the
figure below. The thickness of slab is 125 mm. The floor is to carry an imposed load
of 3.0 kN/m2, partition load of 1.5 kN/m2 and a floor finish load of 0.5 kN/m2.

GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING

Member Properties Loading


fck = 30 MPa w = 3.0 kN/m (Imposed load)
fy = 250 MPa w = 1.5 kN/m (Partition load)
Density of concrete = 24 MPa w = 0.5kN/m (Floor finish load)
w = 0.75 kN/m (Construction load)

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 1


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

TECHNICAL FEATURES TESTED

Composite beam design, including:


 Selection of camber, and shear stud distribution
 Member bending capacities, at construction and in service
 Member deflections, dead load, long-term and maximum live loads
 Steel and Concrete Stresses under Service Loads

RESULTS COMPARISON

The problem data is referenced from Problem 1 in Chapter 22 of the INSDAG


Teaching Materials, but the calculations presented here are totally separate from
the original ones because these refer to the 1985 Indian steel design code.

Percent
Output Parameter Results Independent
Difference

Construction M (kN-m) 224.1 224.1 0.00%

Construction Bending Lateral 261.8 261.8 0.00%


Buckling (kN-m)

Design Shear V (kN) 185.3 185.3 0.00%

Shear Strength Vd (kN) 529.8 529.8 0.00%

Design Moment (kN-m) 463.2 463.2 0.00%

Full Composite Md (kN-m) 661.5 661.5 0.00%

Partial Composite Mc (kN-m) 473.8 473.8 0.00%

Shear Stud Capacity Qn (kN) 75.4 75.4 0.00%

Shear Stud Distribution 22 22 0.00%

Pre-composite Deflection 20 20 0.00%


(mm)

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 2


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

Percent
Output Parameter Results Independent
Difference

Long-term Live Load 6.55 6.55 0.00%


Deflection (mm)

Live Load Deflection (mm) 12.6 12.6 0.00%

Total Deflection - Camber 19.1 19.1 0.00%

Steel Stress under Service 197.1 197.1 0.00%


Loads (MPa)

Concrete Stress under Service 2.5 2.5 0.00%


Loads (MPa)

COMPUTER FILE: IS-11384-2022 EXAMPLE 001.EDB

CONCLUSION

The results show an excellent comparison with the independent results, which is as
expected given that the independent calculations presented here mirror the ETABS
and SAFE calculations.

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 3


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

HAND CALCULATION

Properties:

Materials:
S 355 Steel:
E = 210,000 MPa, fy = 355 MPa, partial safety factor γM0 = 1.1
Normal weight concrete class C25/30:
Ecm = 30,500 MPa, fcu = 30 MPa, density wc = 24 kN/m3
Section:
ISMB450
D= 450 mm, bf = 190.4 mm, tf = 17.4 mm, tw = 9.4 mm,
As = 91.23 cm2, Ix = 30,042 cm4, Ze=1,335.2 cm3 , Zp = 1,534.2 cm3
Deck:
Solid slab depth hc =125 mm
Shear Connectors:
d = 20 mm, h = 100 mm, Fu = 385 MPa

Loadings:

Self-weight slab, decking, reinforcement = 3.0 kN/m2


Self-weight beam = 0.7022 kN/m
Construction load = 0.75 kN/m2
Partitions (live load) = 1.5 kN/m2
Floor finish (live load) = 0.5 kN/m2
Imposed (live load) = 3.0 kN/m2

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 4


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

Design for Construction Flexural Strength:

Construction Flexural Action:


wfactored construction = 1.5 • (3.0 • 3 + 0.7) + 1.5 • 0.75 • 3.0 = 17.925 kN/m

wfactored construction • L2 17.925 • 102


M
= = = 224.1 kN-m
8 8
Construction Design Flexural Resistance:
Flexural resistance assuming the beam is laterally braced:
βb =1 since the ISMB450 steel section is class 1
fy 1.0 • 1,534.2 • 10−6 • 250 • 106 • 10−3
M d =βb Z p • = =348.7 kN-m
γM 0 1.1
Lateral buckling flexural resistance assuming 3.333 m unbraced length:
0.5 • E 0.5 • 210, 000
G is the shear modulus of steel G
= =G = = 80, 769.2 MPa
1 +ν 1 + 0.3

π 2 EI y  π2 
M=
cr •  GI t + 2 
L2TB  LTB 

π 2 • 210, 000 • 9.816 • 106  3 π2 


= 3
•  80, 769.2 64.66
= • 10 + 3 
502.1 kN-m
3.3333 • 10  3.3333 • 10 

λLT
= βb Z p f y / M=
cr 1.534 • 106 • 250 / 502.1 • 10=
6
0.874

αLT= 0.21 since the ISMB450 steel section is a rolled section


ϕ LT = 0.5 1 + α LT ( λLT − 0.2 ) + λLT
2
 = 0.5 1 + 0.21( 0.874 − 0.2 ) + 0.8742  = 0.953

1 1
=χ LT = = 0.7508
ϕ LT + ϕ LT
2
− λLT
2
0.953 + 0.9532 − 0.8742

χ LT f y 0.7508 • 250
fbd
= = = 170.64 MPa
γM0 1.1

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 5


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

M d , LTB= β B Z p • fbd = 1,534.2 • 10−6 • 170.64 • 106= 261, 795 N-m =261.8 kN-m

Design for Ultimate Shear Strength:

Design Shear:
The design shear is equal to the end reactions:
wfactored = 1.5 • (3.0 • 3 + 0.702 + 0.5 • 3 + 1.5 • 3 + 3.0 • 3.0) = 37.053 kN/m

wfactored • L 37.053 • 10
=V = = 185.3 kN-m
2 2

Shear Strength:
The beam frames into a girder with an ISLB600 section whose top flange thickness is
15.5 mm, which results in the beam being coped 20.5 mm on the top at the supports.
As a result, the shear area is equal to:

Av = (d − Copetop ) • t w = (450 − 20.5) • 9.4 = 4, 037.3 mm 2

The shear strength is equal to:


Av f y 4, 037.3 • 250
=Vd = = 529, 758 N = 529.8 kN
γM0 3 1.1 • 3

There is no need to consider the resistance to shear buckling of the web because its
slenderness ratio satisfies:

h 450 250 250


= = 47.9 ≤ 67
=ε 67 = 67 = 67
tw 9.4 Fy 250

Design for Ultimate Flexural Strength:

Flexural Action:

wfactored • L2 37.053 • 102


=M = = 463.2kN-m
8 8

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 6


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

Full Composite Action Design Flexural Strength:


Effective width of slab:
2 • L 2 • 10
beff
= = = 2.5 m
8 8
Concrete area:
2
beff • d=
s 2,500 • 125 • 10−= 3,125 cm 2

Transformed steel area:


fy 250
γM0 1.1
=a = = 21.2
α cc 0.67
η • λ • f ck 1.0 • 0.8 • 30
γc 1.5

aAs =21.2 • 91.23 =1,934 cm 2

beff • d s > aAs therefore, the neutral axis is in the slab and:

=xu aA
=s beff 1934
= 250 7.74 cm

The moment resistance for full composite action is:


As f y
Md
=
γ M 0 ( d c + 0.5d s − λ xu 2 )
 450 + 125 
= 9,123 • 250 − 0.8 • 77.4 2  • 10−3 661.5 kNm
+ 0.5 • 125=
1.1 2 

Partial Composite Action Available Flexural Strength:


Assuming 40% composite action:

PCC • ( M d , full − M d , st ,braced ) + M d , st ,braced =


M d , partial = 0.4 • ( 661.5 − 348.7 ) + 348.7
= 473.8 kN-m

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 7


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

Resistance of Shear Connector:


Resistance of shear connector in solid slab:

2  d2  h 100
Q
=d 0.26 • α • d • f ck • Ecm γ Mv ≤ 0.8 • fu •  π  γ Mv with α =1.0 for = >4
 4  d 20

0.25 • α • d 2 • = 75.4 kN controls


γ v 0.26 • 1.0 • 202 • 30 • 27.386 • 10−3 1.25
f ck Ecm =

 d2   20 
0.8 • fu •  π  γ v =0.8 • 385 •  π  1.25 =77.4 kN
 4   4 
The beam supports a solid slab, therefore Qn = Qd
Resistance provided by the 11 studs located between the support and the mid-span:
A f α 
=•11 75.41 = ∑Q
829.5 kN ≥ 0.4min  s y
n
 γ M0
, cc
γ Mc
η beff d s f ck 

= 0.4 min 9,123 • 250 ,=
1.1 (
0.67 1.0 • 2,500 • 125 • 30 829.4 kN
1.5 )
Deflections

Pre-composite Deflection:
Because the dead load is applied before the concrete has cured, the dead load
deflection is computed based on the moment of inertia of the steel section:
= 0.702 + 3.0 =
wdead • 3 9.702 kN/m

5 • wdead • L4 5 • 9.702 • 10−3 • 10, 0004


=
δ dead = = 20 mm
384 • E • I ay 384 • 210, 000 • 30, 042 • 104

Camber
= 0.8 •=
δ 16 mm, which is rounded down to 15 mm

Long-Term Transformed Moment of Inertia with Full Composite Action:


Long-term modulus of elasticity ratio:
mlong −term= E 0.5 • E=
c 210, 000 0.5 • 27,386= 15.336

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 8


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

Transformed elastic moment of inertia assuming full composite action:

Moment
Arm from
Transformed Steel
Area Centroid Ay Ay2 I0
Element A (cm2) y (cm) (cm3) (cm4) (cm4)

Slab 203.77 28.75 5,858.3 168,425 2653.2

ISMB450 91.23 0 0 0 30042.1

Sum 295 5,858.3 168,425 32,695.3

=y

=
Ay 5858.3
= 19.86 cm
∑A 295
2
I=
tr ∑ I + ∑ Ay
0
2 2
. 32, 695.3 + 168.425 − 295 • 19.86=
− A • y= 84, 782 cm 4

Long-Term Transformed Moment of Inertia with Partial Composite Action:


The effective long-term transformed moment of inertia with partial composite action
is equal to:
I c ,long −term 84,782
=I eff ,long −term = = 63,845 cm 4
I   84,782 
1 + 0.3 (1 − η )  c ,long −term − 1 1 + 0.3 (1 − 0.4 )  − 1
 steelI   30,042 

Superimposed Dead Load Deflection:

5 • wsdl • L4 5 • 1.5 • 10−3 • 10, 0004


=δ sdl = = 1.46 mm
384 • E • I eff ,long −term 384 • 210, 000 • 63,845 • 104

Long-Term Live Load Deflection:


Half the live load is considered long-term:

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 9


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

5 • wlive • L4 5 • 13.5 • 10−3 • 10, 0004


δlive,long −term 0.5
= 0.5 •
= 6.55 mm
=
384 • E • I eff ,long −term 384 • 210, 000 • 63,845 • 104

Short-Term Transformed Moment of Inertia with Full Composite Action:


Short-term modulus of elasticity ratio:
mshort=
−term Ec 210, 000 27,386
E= = 7.668

An initial determination of the elastic neutral axis indicates it is in the slab, which
means some of the concrete is in tension. Through an iterative process, omitted here,
in which any concrete in tension is ignored, the location of the elastic neutral axis is
computed as 235.25 mm above the center of the steel section, and the concrete is in
compression over a depth of 225 + 125 – 235.25 = 114.75 mm
The rest of the calculations is as follows:

Moment
Arm from
Transformed Steel
Area Centroid Ay Ay2 I0
Element A (cm2) y (cm) (cm3) (cm4) (cm4)

Slab 374.1 29.26 10,947 320,340 4104.4

ISMB450 91.2 0 0 0 30042.1

Sum 465.3 10,947 320,340 34,146.5

=y

=
Ay 10, 947
= 23.52 cm
∑A 465.3

2
I=
tr ∑ I + ∑ Ay
0
2 2
. 34,146.5 + 320,340 − 465.3 • 23.52=
− A • y= 96,951 cm 4

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 10


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

Short-Term Transformed Moment of Inertia with Partial Composite Action:


The effective short-term transformed moment of inertia with partial composite action
is equal to:
I c , short −term 96,951
=I eff , short −term = = 69, 210 cm 4
I   96,951 
1 + 0.3 (1 − η )  c , short −term − 1 1 + 0.3 (1 − 0.4 )  − 1
 I steel   30,042 

Short-Term Live Load Deflection:


Half the live load is considered short-term:

5 • 0.5 • wlive • L4 5 • 0.5 • 13.5 • (10, 000) 4


δlive
= , short −term = = 6.04 mm
384 • E • I eff , short −term 384 • 210, 000 • 69, 210 • 104

Live Load Deflection:


The live load deflection is the sum of the long-term and short-term live load
deflections:
δ live =
δ live,long −term + δ live, short −term =
6.55 + 6.04 =12.6 mm

Post-Composite Deflection:
The post-composite deflection is the sum of the superimposed dead load and live
load deflections:
δ sld = δ sdl + δ live =1.46 + 12.6 =14.06 mm

Total Deflection:
The total deflection is the sum of the dead load and post-composite deflections,
minus the camber:
δ total = δ dead + δ sld − camber = 20.02 + 14.06 − 15 =19.1 mm

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 11


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

Steel Stress under Service Loads:

Fully Composite Transformed Bottom Section Modulus for Long-Term Loads:


D
22.5 + 19.86 =
y bottom ,long −term = + y long −term = 42.36 cm
2

I full ,long −term 84, 782.3


Z botom, full
= ,long −term = = 2, 001.5 cm3
y bottom, full ,long −term 42.36

Partially Composite Transformed Bottom Section Modulus for Long-Term Loads:


I eff ,long −term − I steel
Z eff ,long −term =
Ze +
I c ,long −term − I steel
(
Z c ,long −term − Z e )
63,845 − 30,042
1,335.2 +
= ( 2,001.5 − 1,335.2 )
84, 872 − 30,042
= 174,667 cm3

Fully Composite Transformed Bottom Section Modulus for Short-Term Loads:


D
22.5 + 23.52 =
y top , short −term =+ y short −term = 46.02 cm
2

I full , short −term 96,951.3


Z top=
, short −term = = 2,106.5 cm3
y bottom, short −term 46.02

Partially Composite Transformed Bottom Section Modulus for Short-Term Loads:


I eff , short −term − I steel
Z eff , short −term =
Ze +
I c , short −term − I steel
( Z c,short −term − Z e )
69, 210 − 30,042
1,335.2 +
= ( 2,106.5 − 1,335.2 )
96,591 − 30,042
= 178,669 cm3

Bottom Flange Steel Stress due to Dead Load:

wdead • L2 9.702 • 10, 0002


f y ,dead
= = = 90.83 MPa
8 • Ze 8 • 1,335.2 • 103

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 12


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

Bottom Flange Steel Stress due to Superimposed Dead Load:

wsdl • L2 1.5 • 10, 0002


=f y , sdl = = 10.74 MPa
8 • Z eff ,long −term 8 • 174,667 • 103

Bottom Flange Steel Stress due to Long-term Live Load :


Half the live load is considered long-term:

5 • 0.5 • wlive • L2 5 • 0.5 • 13.5 • 10−3 • 10, 0004


f y ,live,long −term
= = = 48.31 MPa
Z eff ,long −term 174, 667 • 103

Bottom Flange Steel Stress due to Short-term Live Load :

5 • 0.5 • wlive • L2 5 • 0.5 • 13.5 • 10−3 • 10, 0004


f y ,live, short −term
= = = 47.22 MPa
Z eff , short −term 178, 669 • 103

Bottom Flange Steel Stress:


The bottom flange steel stress is the sum of the individually computed steel stresses:
f y = f y ,dead + f y , sdl + f y ,live, short −term + f y ,live, short −term = 90.83 + 10.74 + 48.31 + 47.22
= 197.1 MPa

Concrete Stress under Service Load

Fully Composite Transformed Top Section Modulus for Long-Term Loads:


D
y top ,long −term = + hc − y long −term = 22.5 + 12.5 − 19.86 = 15.14 cm
2

I full ,long −term 84, 782.3


Z top , full
= ,long −term = = 5,559.9 cm3
y top , full ,long −term 15.14

Fully Composite Transformed Top Section Modulus for Short-Term Loads:


D
y top , short −term = + hc − y short −term = 22.5 + 12.5 − 23.52 = 11.48 cm
2

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 13


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS, SAFE
REVISION NO.: 1

I full , short −term 96,951.3


Z top=
, short −term = = 8, 449.4 cm3
y top ,, short −term 11.48

Concrete Stress due to Superimposed Dead Load :

wsdl • L2 1.5 • 10, 0002


=f c, sdl = = 0.22 MPa
8 • mlong −term • Z top ,long −term 8 • 15.336 • 5,559.9 • 103

Concrete Stress due to Long-term Live Load:

0.5 • wlive • L2 0.5 • 13.5 • 10, 0002


=f c,live ,long −term = = 0.98 MPa
8 • mlong −term • Z top ,long −term 8 • 15.336 • 5,559.9 • 103

Concrete Stress due to Short-term Live Load :

0.5 • wlive • L2 0.5 • 13.5 • 10, 0002


f c,live , short −term
= = = 1.30 MPa
8 • mshort −term • Z top , short −term 8 • 7.668 • 8, 449.4 • 103

Concrete Stress:
The concrete stress is the sum of the individually computed stresses:
f c,live ,long −term = f c, sdl + f c,live ,long −term + f c,live,lhort −term = 0.22 + 0.98 + 1.30 = 2.5 MPa

Insdag Chapter 22 – Problem 1 - 14

You might also like