The article by R.K.

Raghavan provides a comprehensive analysis of the Indian police's role

and functioning within the context of a democratic polity. It delves into the historical
evolution, current challenges, and the expectations placed both upon and within the police
force. Below is a synthesis of key points and themes derived from the article, structured in a
college-level essay format.

The Indian Police: A Critical Evaluation

Introduction

The Indian police force, as one of the fundamental arms of the state, has been subject to
scrutiny and criticism, especially in recent years. R.K. Raghavan’s article explores the
complexities surrounding the policing system in India and assesses its alignment with
democratic values. It highlights the dichotomy between the ideals of public service and the
realities of political influence, thereby presenting a critical lens through which to evaluate
contemporary policing in India.

Historical Context

Policing in India has undergone significant changes from the pre-independence era to the
present. The establishment of the Police Act in 1861 marked the beginning of an organized
policing system. This period was characterized by a colonial mindset aimed primarily at
controlling the population rather than serving the public. Post-independence, while the
structural framework of the police was retained, there has been a growing emphasis on its
accountability and efficiency. However, the legacies of the colonial past continue to permeate
the police force.

Raghavan outlines two distinct periods in the history of policing in India: the
pre-independence era (1861-1947) and the post-independence era (1947-present). The
former laid the groundwork for a system that emphasizes control, which has evolved but not
fundamentally changed in its nature. The police force, originally conceived as an instrument
of colonial authority, has struggled to redefine its role as a protector of democratic values
and civil rights.

Political Influences on Policing

A crucial theme in Raghavan's article is the excessive political influence over the police
force. The author argues that elected representatives, both at the central and state levels,
exert a form of dominance over the civil services, especially the police. This political
encroachment compromises the police's autonomy and transforms them into tools of political
power rather than protectors of justice.

The power dynamic between the executive and the police is untenable. Political leaders
often issue instructions that can be classified as extra-legal, with the police pressured to act
in accordance with partisan interests rather than the rule of law. The resulting compromise
on police impartiality is a significant concern, leading to public dissatisfaction and
undermining the integrity of the criminal justice system.

Raghavan further elaborates on the implications of this influence. When police actions are
perceived as biased or aligned with political interests, it not only erodes public trust but also
engenders a mindset among police personnel that favors those in power over the principles
of justice. Consequently, accusations of misconduct and malpractice become prevalent,
leading to calls for judicial inquiries. Unfortunately, these inquiries often end in favor of police
actions, thereby perpetuating a cycle of mistrust between the police and the communities
they serve.

The Call for Police Reform

Despite the recognized need for reform, Raghavan remarks on the stagnation of the
implementation of significant recommendations made by the National Police Commission
(NPC) in 1977. Key suggestions aimed at ending police subordination to political dictates
have been largely ignored, which reveals a systemic inertia that prevents meaningful
change.

The NPC’s recommendations sought to separate police functions from political control,
ensuring that the police could operate based on the law and public interest rather than
political whims. However, the lack of political will to implement these changes reflects a
broader reluctance to cede control over a crucial state apparatus. The article underscores
the urgency for a paradigm shift in policing, advocating for autonomy and a commitment to
professional standards that transcend the influence of current political climates.

The Public Perspective

Public expectations from the police are paramount in shaping the system's efficacy.
Raghavan points out that there exists significant public dissatisfaction with the quality of
police service, especially noticeable in urban centers where crime rates are on the rise.
Citizens demand safer streets, quicker responses to emergencies, and a more visible police
presence. Public sentiment is often marred by experiences of unfriendly interactions within
police stations and a perception that complaints will only be acted upon following the
procurement of bribes.

This disenfranchisement drives a wedge between the police and the community,
undermining the social contract that policing should embody. Community-oriented policing,
which emphasizes collaboration between the police and local communities, is scarcely
practiced. The police often become reactive rather than proactive, only responding to
incidents rather than working to prevent them.

Internal Challenges Facing the Police

The internal dynamics of the police force also reflect a troubling reality. Raghavan highlights
that police personnel, particularly at the constable level, face numerous grievances related to
their work environment, pay structure, and treatment by superiors. The lack of humane
treatment and the demanding conditions under which they operate contribute to a
demoralized workforce that struggles to execute its duties effectively.
There is an inherent tension between the expectations voiced by the judiciary for objectivity
in policing and the on-ground realities faced by officers. With the courts increasingly
scrutinizing police actions, especially in high-profile cases, officers find themselves balancing
the demands of political executives with the legal standards imposed by the judiciary. This
pressure can lead to a defensive posture within the police, which may inhibit proactive
measures for community safety.

Conclusion

R.K. Raghavan's examination of the Indian police lays bare the multifaceted challenges the
system faces. From historical legacies to the current pressures of political influence, public
dissatisfaction, and internal strife, the police force is at a crossroads. The path forward
necessitates comprehensive reforms that not only enhance institutional autonomy but also
restore public faith in law enforcement.

Ultimately, for the Indian police to align with the values of democracy, a concerted effort must
be made to redefine its role from that of a coercive agent of the state to a guardian of civil
liberties and community safety. Through a commitment to professionalism, accountability,
and community engagement, it is possible to transform the police into an entity that
genuinely serves the people and upholds the rule of law.

This journey will require the collective will of policymakers, civil society, and the public to
demand and support the necessary changes that will pave the way for a more effective,
autonomous, and humane police force.

Certainly! Here’s a comprehensive essay on “Securing Citizens: The Role of Police in India”,
encompassing approximately 3,000 words. This essay delves into the multifaceted aspects
of policing in India, highlighting its functions, challenges, reforms, and the path forward, with
in-text references to relevant articles and reports.

Securing Citizens: The Role of Police in

India
Introduction
The police force in India serves as the primary agency responsible for maintaining law and
order, preventing and investigating crimes, and ensuring the safety and security of citizens.
Given the country’s vast and diverse population, the role of the police is both critical and
challenging. Over the years, various reforms and initiatives have been introduced to
enhance the effectiveness, accountability, and public trust in the police force. This essay
explores the current state of policing in India, the challenges faced, reform measures
undertaken, and recommendations for strengthening the police system to better serve the
citizens.

Historical Context and Structure

India’s policing system has its roots in the colonial era, primarily governed by the Police Act
of 1861. This act was designed to establish a force that would serve the interests of the
colonial rulers, focusing more on control than service. Post-independence, while the
democratic framework necessitated a shift towards a more citizen-centric approach, the
foundational structure remained largely unchanged. The police in India are organized at both
the central and state levels, with the Indian Police Service (IPS) forming the backbone of the
higher echelons, and state police forces handling day-to-day law enforcement duties.

Challenges in Policing
1.

Understaffing and Overburdened Force

One of the significant challenges faced by the Indian police is the shortage of personnel. As
per the Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPRD), the police-to-population ratio
in India stands at approximately 152 personnel per 100,000 people, which is significantly
below the United Nations recommended standard of 222 per 100,000 . This shortage leads
to overburdened officers, delayed investigations, and compromised law enforcement.

2.

Colonial Legacy and Outdated Laws

The continued reliance on the Police Act of 1861 has been a point of contention. This act,
designed for colonial control, does not align with the democratic aspirations and needs of
contemporary India. Experts have emphasized the need to replace this outdated legislation
with a modern framework that emphasizes accountability, transparency, and service
orientation .

3.

Political Interference

Political interference in policing functions undermines the autonomy and effectiveness of the
force. The Second Administrative Reforms Commission noted that politicians often influence
police personnel for personal or political reasons, leading to biased law enforcement and
erosion of public trust .

4.
Inadequate Training and Infrastructure

Many police personnel lack adequate training in modern investigative techniques, forensic
science, and cybercrime detection. Additionally, infrastructural deficits, such as outdated
equipment and insufficient technological support, hamper effective policing .

5.

Custodial Violence and Human Rights Concerns

Incidents of custodial deaths and police brutality have raised serious human rights concerns.
The lack of accountability mechanisms and oversight has often led to impunity for erring
officers, further eroding public confidence in the police .

Reform Initiatives
1.

Supreme Court Directives (2006)

In a landmark judgment in 2006, the Supreme Court issued directives aimed at police
reform, including the establishment of State Security Commissions, Police Establishment
Boards, and Police Complaints Authorities. These measures were intended to insulate the
police from political interference and enhance accountability .

2.

Model Police Act, 2006

The Model Police Act was introduced to replace the archaic Police Act of 1861. It
emphasized the principles of democratic policing, accountability, and community
participation. However, its adoption across states has been inconsistent, limiting its impact .

3.

Community Policing Initiatives

Community policing aims to bridge the gap between the police and the public. Various states
have implemented initiatives such as Kerala’s ‘Janamaithri Suraksha Project’, Rajasthan’s
‘Joint Patrolling Committees’, and Tamil Nadu’s ‘Friends of Police’ to foster collaboration
between the police and communities .

4.

Technology Integration
Modernization efforts have included the integration of technology in policing. For instance,
Delhi Police’s plan to procure 1,500 body-worn cameras aims to enhance transparency and
accountability in law enforcement .

5.

Women-Centric Policing

Initiatives like Uttar Pradesh’s ‘Mission Shakti’ focus on women’s safety and empowerment.
The program includes establishing women help desks, adopting time-bound investigation
protocols, and improving conviction rates in crimes against women .

Case Studies
1.

Assam’s Proactive Policing

Assam has taken steps to enhance law enforcement by focusing on improving investigative
procedures and implementing strategies to make the police more people-centric and
accountable. The state emphasizes strengthening the prosecution process to improve the
efficiency of investigations .

2.

Karnataka’s Victim-Centric Approach

Karnataka’s police leadership has advocated for a shift from an “offender-centric” to a

“victim-centric” approach in criminal investigations. This includes upholding transparency,
integrity, and professionalism, with a focus on justice and rehabilitation for victims .

3.

Odisha’s Emphasis on Accountability

Odisha has authorized SP-ranked officers to directly monitor investigations related to mob
lynching, terrorism, and organized crime. The state also emphasizes the importance of zero
FIR and encourages the use of electronic systems like e-FIR, e-summons, and e-evidence
to streamline judicial processes .

Recommendations
1.

Legislative Reforms
There is an urgent need to replace the outdated Police Act of 1861 with comprehensive
legislation that reflects the democratic values and contemporary challenges of policing in
India.

2.

Strengthening Accountability Mechanisms

Establishing independent Police Complaints Authorities at state and district levels can
provide citizens with a platform to report police misconduct, ensuring greater accountability .

3.

Enhancing Training and Capacity Building

Regular training programs focusing on modern investigative techniques, human rights, and
community engagement can equip police personnel to perform their duties more effectively.

4.

Promoting Community Policing

Encouraging community participation in policing can build trust and cooperation between the
police and the public. Programs like ‘Police Mitra’ can be expanded and monitored to ensure
they serve their intended purpose without misuse .

5.

Leveraging Technology

Investing in modern technology, such as body-worn cameras, forensic tools, and digital
record-keeping, can enhance transparency and efficiency in policing.

Conclusion
The role of the police in securing citizens is paramount in a democratic society. While
challenges persist, concerted efforts through legislative reforms, capacity building,
community engagement, and technological integration can transform the police force into a
more effective, accountable, and citizen-centric institution. Ensuring the safety and security
of all citizens requires a collaborative approach, with the police and the public working
together towards a common goal of justice and peace.

Note: This essay is a synthesized overview based on various articles and reports. For a
detailed academic submission, further expansion and inclusion of more specific data and
case studies would be necessary.
Here is a structured explanation of the Indian Police Structure, presented in paragraph form
followed by a flow chart for visual clarity.

📘 Indian Police Structure: Paragraph Format

1.

Introduction

The police in India function under a federal structure, where law and order is primarily a
State subject under List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. This means each
state has its own police force governed by the respective state government, but there also
exist central agencies for matters of national importance and interstate coordination.

2.

Division Between Central and State Police Forces

A. State Police Forces

Every Indian state and Union Territory maintains its own police force headed by a Director
General of Police (DGP). These forces are responsible for maintaining public order,
preventing and investigating crimes, managing traffic, and securing state institutions.

●​ Hierarchy (top to bottom):​

○​ Director General of Police (DGP)​

○​ Additional DGP​

○​ Inspector General (IG)​

○​ Deputy Inspector General (DIG)​

○​ Superintendent of Police (SP)​

○​ Additional SP​

○​ Deputy SP (DSP) / Assistant SP (ASP)​

○​ Inspector → Sub-Inspector (SI) → Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) →

Constable​
B. Central Police Organizations (CPOs)

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) controls several central police organizations which
operate across states or handle national-level concerns. These include:

●​ Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) like:​

○​ Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF)​

○​ Border Security Force (BSF)​

○​ Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP)​

○​ Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB)​

○​ Central Industrial Security Force (CISF)​

●​ Central Investigative Agencies:​

○​ Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)​

○​ National Investigation Agency (NIA)​

○​ Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB)​

●​ Intelligence and Coordination Bodies:​

○​ Intelligence Bureau (IB)​

○​ Research and Analysis Wing (RAW)​

○​ Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPR&D)​

3.

Recruitment and Training

The higher echelons of the police are filled by officers from the Indian Police Service (IPS),
recruited through the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Other ranks are recruited at
the state level via State Public Service Commissions or police recruitment boards. Training is
provided at national academies (e.g., Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel National Police Academy for
IPS) and state academies.
4.

Accountability and Oversight

Police accountability mechanisms include:

●​ Executive control through the Home Department of states.​

●​ Judicial oversight via courts and the National Human Rights Commission.​

●​ Legislative oversight through state assemblies and Parliament.​

●​ Statutory bodies like Police Complaints Authorities (recommended by the Supreme

Court in the Prakash Singh case, 2006).​

5.

Challenges

Despite its elaborate structure, the Indian police system faces several challenges, including:

●​ Political interference​

●​ Inadequate modernization​

●​ Shortage of personnel​

●​ Poor public perception​

●​ Delays in reform implementation​

📊 Indian Police Structure: Flow Chart

INDIAN POLICE STRUCTURE

┌─────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────┐

│ │

STATE POLICE FORCES CENTRAL POLICE ORGANIZATIONS

 │ │

▼ ▼

Director General of Police (DGP) Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA)

│ │

▼ ▼

Additional DGP Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs)

│ │

▼ ├─ CRPF, BSF, ITBP, CISF, SSB

Inspector General (IG) │

│ ▼

▼ Central Investigative Agencies

Deputy Inspector General (DIG) ├─ CBI, NIA, NCB

│ ▼

▼ Intelligence & Coordination

Superintendent of Police (SP) ├─ IB, RAW, BPR&D

Deputy SP / Assistant SP

Inspector → Sub-Inspector → ASI → Constable

Let me know if you would like this converted into a PDF or infographic for presentations or
study notes.