0% found this document useful (0 votes)
187 views49 pages

BMA3105 Actuarial Mathematics II Lecture 1 (1) 025228

The document provides comprehensive notes on Actuarial Survival Models, focusing on the mathematical framework used to estimate mortality rates and the probability of death at various ages. It covers key concepts such as the cumulative distribution function, survival distribution function, and various parametric survival models. Additionally, it includes examples and problems to illustrate the application of these concepts in actuarial science.

Uploaded by

mcmojustin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
187 views49 pages

BMA3105 Actuarial Mathematics II Lecture 1 (1) 025228

The document provides comprehensive notes on Actuarial Survival Models, focusing on the mathematical framework used to estimate mortality rates and the probability of death at various ages. It covers key concepts such as the cumulative distribution function, survival distribution function, and various parametric survival models. Additionally, it includes examples and problems to illustrate the application of these concepts in actuarial science.

Uploaded by

mcmojustin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 49

BMA3105 Actuarial Mathematics II

Lecturer 1 : Actuarial Survival Models


Notes Prepared

Gikonyo Kiguta
Mount Kenya University
Contents

1 Actuarial Survival Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5


1.1 Introduction 5
1.2 Age-At-Death Random Variable 5
1.2.1 The Cumulative Distribution Function of X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2.2 The Survival Distribution Function of X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.2.3 The Probability Density Function of X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.2.4 Force of Mortality of X (hazard rate function) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.2.5 The Mean and Variance of X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.3 Selected Parametric Survival Models 20
1.3.1 The Uniform or De Moivre’s Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.3.2 The Exponential Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1.3.3 The Gompertz Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1.3.4 The Modified Gompertz Model: The Makeham’s Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
1.3.5 The Weibull Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1.4 Time-Until-Death Random Variable 28
1.4.1 The Survival Function of T (x) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
1.4.2 The Cumulative Distribution Function of T (x) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
1.4.3 Probability Density Function of T (x) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
1.4.4 Force of Mortality of T (x) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
1.4.5 Mean and Variance of T (x) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
1.4.6 Central Death Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
1.5 The Life Table Format 37
1.5.1 Constructing a life table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
1.5.2 Life table functions at non-integer ages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
1. Actuarial Survival Models

1.1 Introduction
There are insurance policies that provide a benefit on the death of the policyholder. Since the death
date of the policyholder is unknown, the insurer when issuing the policy does not know exactly
when the death benefit will be payable. Thus, an estimate of the time of death is needed. For
that, a model of human mortality is needed so that the probability of death at a certain age can be
calculated. Survival models provide such a framework.

A survival model is a special kind of a probability distribution. In the actuarial context, a survival
model can be the random variable that represents the future lifetime of an entity that existed at time
0.

1.2 Age-At-Death Random Variable


The central difficulty in issuing life insurance is that of determining the time of death of the insured.
In this section, we introduce the first survival model: The age-at-death distribution. Let time 0
denote the time of birth of an individual. We will always assume that everyone is alive at birth .
The age-at-death of the individual can be modeled by a positive continuous random variable X:

1.2.1 The Cumulative Distribution Function of X


The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of X is given by

F(x) = Pr(X ≤ x) = Pr(X < x)

That is, F(x) is the probability that death will occur prior to (or at) age x. Since X is positive, the
event {s : X(s) ≤ 0} is impossible so that F(0) = 0. Also, we know that F(∞) = 1, F(x) is non
decreasing, F(X) is right-continuous, and that F(x) = 0 for x < 0
6 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Recall

Relationship between PDF and CDF for a Continuous Random Variable


Let X be a continuous random variable with pdf f and codf F. - By definition, the cdf is found by
integrating the pdf: Z x
F(x) = f (t)dt
−∞
- By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the pdf can be found by differentiating the cdf:
d
f (x) = [F(x)]
dx

Example

1
Can the function F(x) = x+1 , x ≥ 0 be a legitimate cumulative distribution function of an age-at-
death random variable?

Solution
since F(0) = 1 6= 0, the given function can not be a CDF of an age-at-death random variable

Example
Express the following probability statement in terms of F(x) : Pr(a < X ≤ b | X > a)

Solution.

By Bayes’ formula, we have


Pr[(a < X ≤ b) ∩ (X > a)]
Pr(a < X ≤ b | X > a) =
Pr(X > a)
Pr(a < X ≤ b) F(b) − F(a)
= =
Pr(X > a) 1 − F(a)

Example
Let
 x  61
F(x) = 1 − 1 − , 0 ≤ x ≤ 120
120
Determine the probability that a life aged 35 dies before the age of 55.

Solution

The probability is given by


F(55) − F(35)
Pr(35 < X ≤ 55 | X > 35) = = 0.0437
1 − F(35)
An alternative notation for F(x) used by actuaries is

x q0 = F(x) = Pr(X ≤ x)
1.2 Age-At-Death Random Variable 7

Example

Given that x q0 = 1 − e−0.008x , x ≥ 0. Find the probability that a newborn baby dies between age 60
and age 70.

Solution.

We have
Pr(60 < X ≤ 70) = 70 q0 − 60 q0 = e−0.48 − e−0.56 = 0.04757

Example

Let X be a continuous random variable with PDF


 3
4x 0 < x ≤ 1
fX (x) =
0 otherwise
2 1

Find P X ≤ 3 |X > 3

Solution.

We have
P 13 < X ≤ 32
  
2 1
P X ≤ |X > =
P X > 13

3 3
2
4x3 dx
R 3
1
3
= R1
1 4x3 dx
3
3
=
16

Problem

The CDF of a continuous random variable is given by

F(x) = 1 − e−0.34x , x ≥ 0

Find Pr(10 < X ≤ 23)

Problem

Let
 x  61
F(x) = 1 − 1 − , 0 ≤ x ≤ 120
120
Determine the probability that a newborn survives beyond age 25.

Problem
8 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

The CDF of an age-at-death random variable is given by F(x) = 1− e−0.008x , x ≥ 0. Find the
probability that a newborn baby dies between age 60 and age 70 .

1.2.2 The Survival Distribution Function of X


The survival distribution function is given by

s(x) = 1 − F(x) = Pr(X > x), x ≥ 0.

Thus, s(x) is the probability that a newborn will survive to age x. From the properties of F we see
that:
• s(0) = 1, (everyone is alive at birth)
• s(∞) = 0 (everyone dies eventually)
• s(x) is right continuous
• s(x) is non-increasing
These four conditions are necessary and sufficient so that any non-negative function s(x) that
satisfies these conditions serves as a survival function.

In actuarial notation, the survival function is denoted by x p0 = s(x) = Pr(X > x) = 1 − x q0 .

Example

Consider an age-at-death random variable X with survival distribution defined by

1 1
s(x) = (100 − x) 2 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 100.
10
(a) Explain why this is a suitable survival function.
(b) Find the corresponding expression for the cumulative probability function.
(c) Compute the probability that a newborn with survival function defined above will die between
the ages of 65 and 75 .

Solution.
1
(a) We have that s(0) = 1, s0 (x) = − 20 1
(100 − x)− 2 ≤ 0, s(x) is right continuous, and s(100) = 0.
Thus, s satisfies the properties of a survival function.
1 1
(b) We have F(x) = 1 − s(x) = 1 − 10 (100 − x) 2 .
(c) We have
1 1 1 1
Pr(65 < X ≤ 75) = s(65) − s(75) = (100 − 65) 2 − (100 − 75) 2 ≈ 0.092
10 10

Example

The survival distribution function for an individual is determined to be


75 − x
s(x) = , 0 ≤ x ≤ 75.
75
(a) Find the probability that the person dies before reaching the age of 18.
(b) Find the probability that the person lives more than 55 years.
1.2 Age-At-Death Random Variable 9

(c) Find the probability that the person dies between the ages of 25 and 70 .

Solution.

(a) We have
Pr(X < 18) = Pr(X ≤ 18) = F(18) = 1 − s(18) = 0.24
(b) We have
Pr(X > 55) = s(55) = 0.267
(c) We have
Pr(25 < X < 70) = F(70) − F(25) = s(25) − s(70) = 0.60

Problem

Consider an age-at-death random variable X with survival distribution defined by


s(x) = e−0.34x , x ≥ 0
Compute Pr(5 < X < 10).

Problem

Consider an age-at-death random variable X with survival distribution

x p0 = e−0.34x , x ≥ 0.
Find x q0 .

Problem
2
x
Find the cumulative distribution function corresponding to the survival function s(x) = 1 − 100 for
x ≥ 0 and 0 otherwise.

Problem

x
The survival distribution is given by s(x) = 1 − 100 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 100 and 0 otherwise.
(a) Find the probability that a person dies before reaching the age of 30 .
(b) Find the probability that a person lives more than 70 years.

1.2.3 The Probability Density Function of X


The probability density function of an age-at-death random variable X measures the relative
likelihood for death to occur for a given age.
The PDF of X relates to a point and is considered as an instantaneous measure of death at age x
compared to F(x) and s(x) which are probabilities over time intervals so they are considered as
time-interval measures.
Mathematically, the probability density function, denoted by f (x), is given by
d d
f (x) = F(x) = − s(x), x ≥ 0
dx dx
10 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

whenever the derivative exists. Note that f (x) ≥ 0 for x ≥ 0 since F is non-decreasing for x ≥ 0.
When the density function is defined over the relevant interval, we have
Z b
Pr(a < X ≤ b) = f (x)dx,
a

Z x Z x
F(x) = f (t)dt = f (t)dt
−∞ 0

Z ∞ Z x Z ∞
s(x) = 1 − F(x) = f (t)dt − f (t)dt = f (t)dt.
0 0 x

Using laws of probability, we can use either F(x) or s(x) to answer probability statements.

Example

1
Explain why the function f (x) = 5 , x ≥ 0 and 0 otherwise can not be a PDF.
(x+1) 2

Solution.
R∞
If f (x) is a PDF then we must have 0 f (x)dx = 1. But

dx 2 2
Z ∞
5 =− 3 = 6= 1
0 (x + 1) 2 3(x + 1) 2 3
0

Example

Suppose that the survival function of a person is given by


80 − x
s(x) = , 0 ≤ x ≤ 80.
80
Calculate
(a) F(x).
(b) f (x).
(c) Pr(20 < X < 50).

Solution.

(a) We have
x
F(x) = 1 − s(x) = ,x ≥ 0
80
(b) We have
1
f (x) = −s0 (x) = , x > 0.
80
(c) We have
Pr(20 < X < 50) = s(20) − s(50) = 0.375
1.2 Age-At-Death Random Variable 11

Example

Find a formula both in terms of F(x) and s(x) for the conditional probability that an entity will die
between the ages of x and z, given that the entity is survived to age x.

Solution.

We have
Pr[(x < X ≤ z) ∩ (X > x)]
Pr(x < X ≤ z | X > x) =
Pr(X > x)
Pr(x < X ≤ z)
=
Pr(X > x)
F(z) − F(x)
=
1 − F(x)
s(x) − s(z)
=
s(x)

Example

An age-at-death random variable is modeled by an exponential random variable with PDF f (x) =
0.34e−0.34x , x ≥ 0. Use the given PDF to estimate Pr(1 < X < 1.02).

Solution.

We have
Pr(1 < X < 1.02) ≈ 0.02 f (1) = 0.005

Problem

The density function of a random variable X is given by f (x) = xe−x for x ≥ 0. Find the sur-
vival distribution function of X.

Problem

Consider an age-at-death random variable X with survival distribution defined by

s(x) = e−0.34x , x ≥ 0

Find the PDF and CDF of X.

Problem

Find the probability density function of a continuous random variable X with survival function
s(x) = e−λ x , λ > 0, x ≥ 0.
12 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

1.2.4 Force of Mortality of X (hazard rate function)


This may be defined as the "instantaneous rate of mortality", i.e.
h qx
µx = lim
h→0+ h
Theorem
Suppose that µx is continuous on [α, w). We have

s0 (x) l0
µx = − =− x
s(x) lx
Proof.
we have
−[s(x + h) − s(x)] −s0+ (x)
µx = lim =
h→0+ hs(x) s(x)
where s0+ (x) denotes the R.H. derivative of s(x). But s(x) and s0+ (x) = −s(x)µx are continuous on
[α, w), so s0 (x) exists and equals −s(x)µx

Hence
s0 (x) l0
µx = − =− x
s(x) lx
We remark that
d
µx = − log lx
dx
Hence Z x Z x
d
− µy dy = (log ly ) dy
α dy
α
= [log ly ]xα
= log lx − log lα
 
lx
= log

from which we obtain the important formulae:
 Zx 
lx = lα exp − µy dy
α

and  Zx 
s(x) = exp − µy dy
α

It follows that  Z x+t   Zt 


lx+t
t px = = exp − µy dy = exp − µx+r dr
lx x 0

Note
We can also express the hazard rate in terms of s(s)and f (x):

Pr(x < X ≤ x + h | X > x) f (x) f (t)


µ(x) = lim = = = hazard rate at age t years .
h→0 h s(x) 1 − F(t)
1.2 Age-At-Death Random Variable 13

Example

A life aged 50 has a force of mortality at age 50 equal to 0.0044. Estimate the probability
that the person dies on his birthday.

Solution.

1
From the above definition with x = 50, µ(50) = 0.0044, and h = 365 = 0.00274
we can write
Pr(50 < X < 50 + 0.00274 | X > 50) ≈ µ(50) × 0.0044
= (0.00274)(0.0044) = 1.2 × 10−5

We can relate the mortality function to the survival function from birth as shown in the next example.

Example

Show that
s0 (x) d
µ(x) = − = − [ln s(x)]
s(x) dx

Solution.
s0 (x)
The equation follows from f (x) = −s0 (x) and d
dx [ln s(x)] = s(x)

Example

Find the hazard rate function of an exponential random variable with parameter µ.

Solution.

We have
f (x) µe−µx
µ(x) = = −µx = µ.
s(x) e
The exponential random variable is an example of a constant force model

Cumulative hazard function (integrated hazard function

The function Λ(x) is called the cumulative hazard function or the integrated hazard function
(CHF). The CHF can be thought of as the accumulation of hazard up to time x.

Λ(x) = − ln(s(x))
Summarizing, if we know any one of the functions µ(x), Λ(x), s(x) we can derive the other two
functions:

d
µ(x) = − ln s(x)
dx
Λ(x) = − ln(s(x))
14 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

−s(x) = e−Λ(x)
Now, for a function µ(x) to be an acceptable force of mortality, the function s(x) = e−Λ(x) must be
an acceptable survival function.

Example

Show that
s(x) = e−Λ(x)
where Z x
Λ(x) = µ(s)ds.
0

Solution.

Z x Z x
d
µ(s)ds = − [ln s(s)]ds = ln s(0) − ln s(x) = ln 1 − ln s(x) = − ln s(x).
0 0 ds

Example

Find the cumulative hazard function of the exponential random variable with parameter µ.

Solution.

We have Z x Z x
Λ(x) = µ(s)ds = µdx = µx
0 0

Example

The force of mortality is


1
µx =
100 − x
Calculate 10 p50 .

Solution.

 Z 10 
10 p50 = exp − µ50+s ds
0
 Z 10 
ds
= exp −
0 50 − s
= exp(ln(50 − 10) − ln(50))
40
= = 0.8
50
˜
Example
1.2 Age-At-Death Random Variable 15

A person age 70 is subject to the following force of mortality:


(
0.01 t ≤ 5
µ70 (t) =
0.02 t > 5

Calculate 20 p70 for this person.

Solution.

20
 Z 
20 p70 = exp − µ70 (s)ds
0
Break the integral up into two parts:
Z 5 Z 5
µ70 (t)dt = 0.01 dt = 0.05
0 0
Z 20 Z 20
µ70 (t)dt = 0.02 dt = 0.3
5 5

It follows that 20 p70 is the product of the negative exponentiated integrals,

20 p70 = e−0.05−0.3 = 0.70469

Example

Which of the following functions can serve as a force of mortality?


(I) µ(x) = BCx , B > 0, 0 < C < 1, x ≥ 0.
1
(II) µ(x) = B(x + 1)− 2 , B > 0, x ≥ 0.
(III) µ(x) = k(x + 1)n , n > 0, k > 0, x ≥ 0.

Solution.

(I) Finding s(x), we have Rx B x


s(x) = e− 0 µ(t)dt
= e lnC (1−C ) .
B
We have s(x) ≥ 0, s(0) = 1, s(∞) = e lnC 6= 0. Thus, the given function cannot be a force of mortality.

(II) Finding s(x), we have  


1
Rx −2B (x+1) 2 −1
s(x) = e− 0 µ(t)dt
=e .
We have, s(x) ≥ 0, s(0) = 1, s(∞) = 0, s0 (x) < 0, and s(x) is rightcontinuous. Thus, µ(x) is a
legitimate force of mortality.

(III) Finding s(x), we have


Rx kxn+1
s(x) = e− 0 µ(t)dt
= e− n+1 .
We have, s(x) ≥ 0, s(0) = 1, s(∞) = 0, s0 (x) < 0, and s(x) is right-continuous. Thus, µ(x) is a
legitimate force of mortality
16 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Problem

An age-at-death random variable has a survival function

1 1
s(x) = (100 − x) 2 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 100.
10
Find the force of mortality of this random variable.

Problem

Consider an age-at-death random variable X with survival distribution defined by

s(x) = e−0.34x , x ≥ 0

Find µ(x).

Problem

Let
 x  61
F(x) = 1 − 1 − , 0 ≤ x ≤ 120
120
Find µ(40).

Problem

3
The force of mortality of a survival model is given by µ(x) = x+2 , x ≥ 0. Find Λ(x), s(x), F(x), and
f (x).

1.2.5 The Mean and Variance of X


For a continuous random variable X, the mean of X, also known as the (unconditional) first moment
of X, is given by Z ∞
E(X) = x f (x)dx
0

provided that the integral is convergent.


Z ∞ Z ∞
E(X) = x f (x)dx = − xs0 (x)dx
0 0
Z ∞ Z ∞
= −xs(x)]∞
0 + s(x)dx = s(x)dx.
0 0

In the actuarial context, E(X) is known as the life expectancy or the complete expectation of life

at birth and is denoted by ex .
Z ∞ Z ∞

ex = t px dt = s(x)dx
0 0

Likewise, the mean of X 2 or the (unconditional) second moment of X is given by


 Z ∞
E X2 = x2 f (x)dx
0
1.2 Age-At-Death Random Variable 17

provided that the integral is convergent.

Using integration by parts Z ∞


2

E X =2 xs(x)dx
0
The variance of X is given by
Var(X) = E X 2 − [E(X)]2 .


Example

An actuary models the lifetime in years of a random selected person as a random variable X
1
x 2
with survival function s(x) = 1 − 100 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 100. Find e◦0 and Var(X).

Solution.

The mean is
100
x  12 x  23
Z 100 
◦ 2 200
e0 = E(X) = 1− dx = − 1− =
0 100 3 100 0 3
The second moment of X is
100 x − 12
Z 100
 Z 1  16000
E X2 = x2 f (x)dx = x2 1 − dx =
0 200 0 100 3
Thus,
16000 40000 80000
Var(X) = E X 2 − [E(X)]2 =

− =
3 9 9

Two more important concepts about X are the median and the mode.

The median of a continuous random variable X is defined to be the value m satisfying the equation
1
Pr(X ≤ m) = Pr(X ≥ m) =
2
Thus, the median age-at-death m is the solution to
1
F(m) = 1 − s(m) =
2
We define the mode of X to be the value of x that maximizes the PDF f (x).

Example

Consider an age-at-death random variable X with cumulative distribution defined by


 x  12
F(x) = 1 − 1 − , 0 ≤ x ≤ 100.
100
Find the median and the mode of X.
18 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Solution.

m
 12
To find the median, we have to solve the equation 1 − 100 = 0.5 which gives m = 75.
− 12
To find the mode, we first find f (x) = F 0 (x) = − 200
1 x
1 − 100 .

The maximum of this function on the interval [0, 100] occurs when x = 0 (you can check this
either analytically or graphically) so that the mode of X is 0

Problem

Consider an age-at-death random variable X with survival function s(x) = (1 + x)e−x , x ≥ 0.


Calculate E(X).

Problem

The age-at-death random variable has the PDF f (x) = 1k , 0 ≤ x ≤ k. Suppose that the expected
age-at-death is 4 . Find the median age-at-death.

Problem

An actuary models the lifetime in years of a random selected person as a random variable X
x2
with survival function s(x) = 1 − 8100 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 90. Calculate ė0 and Var(X).

Problem

1
A survival distribution has a force of mortality given by µ(x) = 720−6x , 0 ≤ x < 120.

(a) Calculate e0 .
(b) Find Pr(30 ≤ X ≤ 60).

Problem

24
The PDF of a survival model is given by f (x) = 2+x . Find the median and the mode of X.

Curtate expectation of life

We now consider the discrete random variable K (or K(x) if the age x is not clear) defined by

K = the integer part of T


= the number of complete years to be lived
in the future by (x)

Now it follows by formula 1.3.16 that

Pr{K = k} = k | qx (k = 0, 1, 2, . . .)
1.2 Age-At-Death Random Variable 19

This variable is used in many actuarial calculations. In particular, the curtate expectation of life at
age x, written ex , is the mean of K; that is
∞ ∞
ex = ∑ k · k qx = ∑ k·k qx
k=0 k=1

Theorem ∞
lx+1 + lx+2 + . . .
ex = ∑ k px =
k=1 lx
Proof.
dx+1 dx+2 dx+3
ex = +2 +3 +...
lx lx lx
1
= [(dx+1 + dx+2 + dx+3 + . . .)
lx
+ (dx+2 + dx+3 + . . .)
+ (dx+3 + . . .)
+ . . .]
lx+1 + lx+2 + lx+3 + . . .
=
lx
ly = (ly − ly+1 ) + (ly+1 − ly+2 ) + . . .
= dy + dy+1 + . . .
[since We may also evaluate Var(K) by the formula

Var(K) = E K 2 − [E(K)]2


dx+k
= ∑ k2 − (ex )2
k=1 lx

As is clear by general reasoning,


◦ 1
ex + ex +
2

Example

In a certain population, the force of mortality equals 0.025 at all ages. (We are assuming here that
there is no upper limit to age.)
Calculate:
(i) the probability that a new-born baby will survive to age 5
(ii) the probability that a life aged exactly 10 will die before age 12
(iii) the probability that a life aged exactly 5 will die between ages 10 and 12
(iv) the complete expectation of life of a new-born baby
(v) the curtate expectation of life of a new-born baby.

Solution.

(i)  Z5 
p
5 0 = exp − 0.025dt = e−0.125 = 0.88250
0
20 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

(ii)  Z2 
2 q10 = 1 − 2 p10 = 1 − exp − 0.025dt = 1 − e−0.05 = 0.04877
0

(iii)
5 | 2 q5 = 5 p5 · 2q10 = e−0.125 × 0.04877 = 0.88250 × 0.04877 = 0.04304
(iv)
1  −0.025t ∞ 1
Z ∞ Z ∞

e0 = t p0 dt = e−0.025t dt = − e 0
= = 40
0 0 0.025 0.025
(v)
∞ ∞
e−0.025
e0 = ∑ kp0 = ∑ e−0.025k = 1 − e−0.025
= 39.5
k=1 k=1

1.3 Selected Parametric Survival Models


Parametric survival models are models for which the survival function s(x) is given by a mathemat-
ical formula. In this section, we explore some important parametric survival models.

1.3.1 The Uniform or De Moivre’s Model


Let X be a uniform random variable on the interval [a, b]. It is easy to see 3 that the PDF of this
1
random variable is f (x) = b−a for a ≤ x ≤ b and zero elsewhere. This model is an example of a
two-parameter model with parameters a and b.

If X is the age-at-death random variable, we take a = 0 and b = ω where ω is the maximum


or terminal age by which all people have died then the PDF is f (x) = ω1 for 0 ≤ x ≤ ω and 0
otherwise. In the actuarial context, this survival model is known as De Moivre’s Law.

Example

Consider the uniform distribution model as defined above. Find F(x), s(x), and µ(x).

Solution.

We have Z x
x
F(x) = f (s)ds =
0 ω
ω −x
s(x) = 1 − F(x) =
ω
f (x) 1
µ(x) = =
s(x) ω −x

Example

Consider the uniform distribution model as defined above. Find e0 and Var(X).

Solution.

We have Z ω
◦ ω
e0 = E(X) = x f (x)dx =
0 2
1.3 Selected Parametric Survival Models 21

and
 Z ω ω2
E X2 = x2 f (x)dx = .
0 3
Thus,
ω2 ω2 ω2
Var(X) = − =
3 4 12

Problem

Suppose that the age-at-death random variable X is uniform in [0, ω]. Find Var(X) if e0 = 45.

Problem

625
Suppose that the age-at-death random variable X is uniform in [0, ω] with Var(X) = 3 . Find ω.

Problem

x
The survival function in De Moivre’s Law is given by s(x) = 1 − 90 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 90. Calculate
(a) µ(x)
(b) F(x)
(c) f (x)
(d) Pr(20 < X < 50).

1.3.2 The Exponential Model


In this survival model, the age-at-death random variable follows an exponential distribution with
survival function given by
s(x) = e−µx , x ≥ 0, µ > 0.
This model is also known as the constant force model since the force of mortality is constant.

FT (x) (t) = 1 − e−µt


sT (x) (t) = e−µt
fT (x) (t) = µe−µt
µx (t) = µ
= s(x) = e−µt
t px
1
E[T (x)] =
µ
1
Var(T (x)) = 2
µ

Example

Consider the exponential model. Find F(x), f (x), and µ(x).

Solution.
22 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

We have
F(x) = 1 − s(x) = 1 − e−µx
f (x) = F 0 (x) = µe−µx
f (x)
µ(x) = =µ
s(x)

Example

Consider the exponential model. Find e0 and Var(X).

Solution.

We have
1
Z ∞ Z ∞

e0 = E(X) = x f (x)dx = µxe−µx dx =
0 0 µ
and
∞ 2
 Z Z ∞
E X2 = x2 f (x)dx = µx2 e−µx dx = .
0 0 µ2
Thus,
2 1 1
Var(X) = − = 2
µ2 µ2 µ

Example

Consider an exponential model with density function f (x) = 0.01e−0.01x , x > 0 . Calculate x q0 and
x p0 .

Solution.

We have
x q0 = Pr(X ≤ x) = F(x) = 1 − e−0.01x
x p0 = 1 − x q0 = e−0.01x

Example

Let the age-at-death be exponential with density function f (x) = 0.01e−0.01x . Find Pr(1 < x < 2).

Solution.

We have
Pr(1 < X < 2) = s(1) − s(2) = 1 p0 − 2 p0 = e−0.01 − e−0.02 = 0.00985

Example
1.3 Selected Parametric Survival Models 23

Given the survival function



1,
 0≤x≤1
s(x) = 1 − 0.01ex 1 < x < 4.5

0. x ≥ 4.5

Find µ(4).

Solution.

We have
s0 (4) 0.01e4
µ(4) = − = = 1.203
s(4) 1 − 0.01e4

Problem

Consider an exponential survival model with s(x) = e−0.04x where x in years. Find the proba-
bility that a newborn survives beyond 20 years.

Problem

An exponential model has a force of mortality equals to 0.04. Find the probability that a newborn
dies between the age of 20 and 30 .

Problem
x
An exponential model has a survival function s(x) = e− 2 , x ≥ 0. Calculate µ(40).

Problem

Find the value of µ and the median survival time for an exponential survival function if s(3) = 0.4.

Problem
x
1 − 60
The age-at-death random variable is described by the PDF f (x) = 60 e .

Find e0 and Var(X).

1.3.3 The Gompertz Model


Gompertz proposed the force of mortality

µx = Bcx

with appropriate parameters B and c > 1. 1 He based this law on studies in which the logarithm of
the force of mortality over a wide range of ages above 20 appeared to fit well to a straight line.

Example

Find the survival function of Gompertz model.


24 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Solution.

We have Rx Rx B
Bcs ds x
s(x) = e− 0 µ(s)ds
= e− 0 = e ln c (1−c )

Example

Under Gompertz’ Law, you are given that µ(20) = 0.0102 and µ(50) = 0.025. Find µ(x).

Solution.

The given hypotheses lead to the two equations

Bc20 = 0.0102

and
Bc50 = 0.025
.
0.025
Thus, taking ratios we find c30 = 0.0102 . Solving for c we find c = 1.03. Thus,

0.0102
B= = 0.0056
1.0320
. The force of mortality is given by

µ(x) = 0.0056(1.03)x

Example

You are given that mortality follows Gompertz with B = 0.01 and c = 1.1. Calculate
(i) µ(10)
(ii) the probability of a life aged 20 to attain age 30
(iii) the probability of a life aged 20 to die within 10 years.

Solution.

(i) We have
µ(10) = BC10 = 0.01(1.1)10 = 0.025937
(ii) We have
Pr(X > 30) s(30)
Pr(X > 30 | X > 20) = =
Pr(X > 20) s(20)
0.01 30
e ln 1.1 (1−1.1 )
= 0.01 20
= 0.32467
e ln 1.1 (1−1.1 )
(iii) We have

Pr(X < 30 | X > 20) = 1 − Pr(X > 30 | X > 20) = 1 − 0.32467 = 0.67533
1.3 Selected Parametric Survival Models 25

Problem

Suppose that the lives of a certain species follow Gompertz’s Law. It is given that µ(0) = 0.43 and
µ(1) = 0.86. Determine µ(4).

Problem
s0 (x)
Suppose that Gompertz’ Law applies with µ(30) = 0.00013 and µ(50) = 0.000344. Find s(x) .

Problem

A survival model follows Gompertz’ Law with parameters B = 0.0004 and c = 1.07. Find the
cumulative distribution function.

1.3.4 The Modified Gompertz Model: The Makeham’s Model


Makeham improved Gompertz’s law by adding a third parameter A :

µx = A + Bcx

A represents the constant part of the force of mortality, mortality that is independent of age and
is due to accidental causes. Bcx , with c > 1, represents mortality resulting from deterioration and
degeneration, which increases exponentially by age.

Example

Find the survival function of Makeham’s model.

Solution.

We have
Rx Rx s B x
s(x) = e− 0 µ(s)ds
= e− 0 (A+Bc )ds = e−Ax− ln c (c −1)

Example

A survival model follows Makeham’s Law. You are given the following information: - 5 p70 = 0.70.
- 5 p80 = 0.40. - 5 p90 = 0.15. Determine the parameters A, B, and c.

Solution.
B x t
Let α = e−A and β = e ln c in the previous problem so that t px = α t β c (1−c ) . From the given
hypotheses we can write
70 5
α 5 β c (1−c ) = 0.70
80 5
α 5 β c (1−c ) = 0.40
90 5
α 5 β c (1−c ) = 0.15.
26 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Hence,  
0.40
= c70 1 − c5 c10 − 1 ln β
 
ln
0.70
and  
0.15
= c80 1 − c5 c10 − 1 ln β
 
ln
0.40
From these two last equations, we find
   
0.15 0.40
c10 = ln ÷ ln =⇒ c = 1.057719.
0.40 0.70

Substituting this above we find


 
0.40
÷ c70 1 − c5 c10 − 1 =⇒ β = 1.04622
 
ln β = ln
0.70

Solving the equation


B
e ln 1.057719 = 1.04622
we find B = 0.002535. Also,
h 70 5
i
A = −0.2 ln 0.70β c (c −1) = −0.07737.

Finally, the force of mortality is given by

µ(x) = −0.07737 + 1.04622(1.057719)x , x ≥ 0

Problem

The force of mortality of Makeham’s model is given by µ(x) = 0.31+ 0.43 (2x ) , x ≥ 0. Find
f (x) and F(x)

Problem

The force of mortality of Makeham’s model is given by µ(x) = 0.31+ 0.43 (2x ) , x ≥ 0. Cal-
culate s(3)

Problem

The following information are given about a Makeham’s model:


- The accident hazard is 0.31.
- The hazard of aging is 1.72 for x = 2 and 3.44 for x = 3.

Problem

The force of mortality of a Makeham’s Law is given by µ(x) = A + 0.1(1.003)x , x ≥ 0 . Find


µ(5) if s(35) = 0.02.
1.3 Selected Parametric Survival Models 27

1.3.5 The Weibull Model


The Weibull law of mortality is defined by the hazard function

µ(x) = kxn ,

where k > 0, n > 0, x ≥ 0. That is, the death rate is proportional to a power of age. Notice that the
exponential model is a special case of Weibull model where n = 0.

Example

Find the survival function corresponding to Weibull model.

Solution.

We have Rx Rx kxn+1
ksn ds
s(x) = e− 0 µ(s)ds
= e− 0 =e n+1

Example

Suppose that X follows an exponential model with µ = 1. Define the random variable Y =
1
h(X) = X 3 . Show that Y follows a Weibull distribution. Determine the values of k and n.

Solution.
(y)
We need to find the force of mortality of Y using the formula µY (y) = sfYY (y) . We first find the
CDF of Y . We have
 1  3
FY (y) = Pr(Y ≤ y) = Pr X 3 ≤ y = Pr X ≤ y3 = 1 − e−y .


Thus,
3
sY (y) = 1 FY (y) = e−y
and
3
fY (y) = FY0 (y) = 3y2 e−y .
The force of mortality of Y is
fY (y)
µY (y) = = 3y2 .
sY (y)
It follows that Y follows a Weibull distribution with n = 2 and k = 3

Example

You are given that mortality follows Weibull with k = 0.00375 and n = 1.5. Calculate
(i) µ(10) R 30
(ii) 10 p20 = e− 20 µ(x)dx .
(iii) 10 q20 = 1 − 10 p20 .

Solution.
28 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

(i)
µ(10) = kxn = 0.00375(10)1.5 = 0.11859
(ii)
R 30
0.00375x1.5 dx
10 p20 = e− 20 = 0.089960
(iii)
10 q20 = 1 − 10 p20 = 1 − 0.089960 = 0.99100

Problem

Consider a Weibull model with k = 2 and n = 1. Calculate s(15) and µ(15).

Problem

Consider a Weibull model with k = 3. It is given that µ(2) = 12. Calculate s(4).

Problem

Consider a Weibull model with n = 1. It is given that s(20) = 0.14. Determine the value of
k.

Problem

A survival model follows a Weibull Law with mortality function µ(x) = kxn . It is given that
µ(40) = 0.0025 and µ(60) = 0.02. Determine the parameters k and n

1.4 Time-Until-Death Random Variable


Let (x) indicate that a newborn is known to be alive at age x or simply a life aged x. We let T (x) be
the continuous random variable that represents the additional time (x) might survive beyond the
age of x.

We define T (x) as the time-until-death or the future-lifetime random variable.

From this definition, we have a relationship between the age-at-death random variable X and
the time-until-death T (x) given by
X = x + T (x)

1.4.1 The Survival Function of T (x)


For t ≥ 0, the actuarial notation of the survival function of T (x) is t px . Thus, t px is the probability
of a life aged x to attain age x + t. That is, t px is a conditional probability. In symbol,

t px = sT (x) (t) = Pr(X > x + t | X > x) = Pr[T (x) > t]

In the particular case of a life aged 0 , we have T (0) = X and x p0 = s(x), x ≥ 0 .


Using the fact that the event {X > x + t} is a subset of the event {X > x} and the conditional
1.4 Time-Until-Death Random Variable 29
Pr(E∩F)
probability formula Pr(E | F) = Pr(F) we find

Pr[(X > x + t) ∩ (X > x)]


t px = Pr(X > x + t | X > x) =
Pr(X > x)
Pr(X > x + t) s(x + t)
= =
Pr(X > x) s(x)

Example

Find t px in the case X is exponentially distributed with parameter µ.

Solution.

We have
s(x + t) e−µ(x+t)
t px = = −µx = e−µt
s(x) e

Example

75−x−t
Suppose that t px = 75−x , 0 ≤ t ≤ 75 − x. Find the probability that a 35 -year-old reaches age 70 .

Solution.

We have
75 − 35 − 35 5
70 − 35p35 = = = 0.143
75 − 35 35

Problem

x
You are given the survival function s(x) = 1 − 75 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 75. Find the survival function and
the probability density function of T (x).

Problem

x
The survival function is given by s(x) = 1 − 100 , x ≥ 0.
(a) Express the probability that a person aged 35 will die between the ages of 52 and 73 using the p
notation.
(b) Calculate the probability in (a).

Problem

1
The PDF of X is given by f (x) = (x+1)2
,x ≥ 0. Find t p3 .
30 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

1.4.2 The Cumulative Distribution Function of T (x)


From the survival function we can find the cumulative distribution function of T (x) which we
denote by t qx = FT (x) (t). Thus,

t qx = Pr[T (x) ≤ t] = 1 − t px .

Note that t qx is the probability of (x) does not survive beyond age x +t or the conditional probability
that death occurs not later than age x + t, given survival to age x. It also follows that

s(x + t)
t qx = 1−
s(x)

Example

Find 3 p5 and 4 q7 if s(x) = e−0.12x .

Solution.

We have
s(3 + 5) e−0.12(8)
3 p5 = = −0.12(5) = 0.69768.
s(5) e
Likewise,
s(4 + 7) e−0.12(11)
4 q7 = 1 − = 1 − −0.12(7) = 0.38122
s(7) e

Problem

100
1.1
Given the survival function s(x) = 100+x . What is the probability of a newborn who lived to
age 25 to survive an additional year?

Problem

The survival function is given by

s(x) = (1 − 0.01x)0.5 , 0≤x≤1

What is the probability that a life aged 40 to die between the ages of 60 and 80 ?

Problem

You are given the hazard rate function

1.1
µ(x) = , x ≥ 0.
100 + x

Find a formula for t q20 .


1.4 Time-Until-Death Random Variable 31

1.4.3 Probability Density Function of T (x)


Now, from the CDF of T (x) we can find an expression for the probability density function of T (x).
Indeed, we have  
d d s(x + t) f (x + t)
fT (x) (t) = [t qx ] = − = .
dt dt s(x) s(x)
In words, fT (x) (t) is the conditional density of death at time t given survival to age x or the condi-
tional density at age x + t, given survival to age x.

Example

x 2
An age-at-death random variable has the survival function s(x) = 1 − 10000 for 0 ≤ x < 100.
(a) Find the survival function of T (x).
(b) Find the PDF of T (x).

Solution.

(a) The survival function of T (x) is

(x+t) 2
s(x + t) 1 − 10000 10000 − (x + t)2
t px = = 2 = , 0 ≤ t ≤ 100 − x.
s(x) x
1 − 10000 10000 − x2

(b) The PDF of T (x) is


 
d s(x + t) 2(x + t)
fT (x) (t) = − = , 0 ≤ t ≤ 100 − x
dt s(x) 10000 − x2

Problem

x
Consider the survival function s(x) = 1 − 90 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 90. Find the survival function and the
probability density function of T (x).

Problem

t
Suppose that t px = 1 − 90−x , 0 ≤ t ≤ 90 − x. Find the density function of T (x).

Problem
1
An age-at-death random variable has the CDF F(x) = 1 − 0.10(100 − x) 2 for 0 ≤ x ≤ 100. Find
fT (36) (t).

Problem

Let age-at-death random variable X have density function:


x
f (x) = , 0 ≤ x ≤ 10
50
Find fT (2) (t).
32 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

1.4.4 Force of Mortality of T (x)


Recall that the hazard rate function µ(x) is the death rate at age x given survival to age x. That is,
Pr(x < X ≤ x + h | X > x)
µ(x) = lim
h→0 h
Likewise, we have
Pr(t < T (x) ≤ t + h | T (x) > t)
µT (x) (t) = lim
h→0 h
Pr(x + t < X ≤ x + t + h | X > x + t)
= lim
h→0 h
= µ(x + t)

That is, µT (x) (t) is the death rate at age x + t given survival to age x + t. The PDF of T (x) can be
expressed in terms of the distribution of X as shown in the next example.

Example

Show that fT (x) (t) = t px µ(x + t), x ≥ 0,t ≥ 0.

Solution.

We have
d d
fT (x) (t) = FT (x) (t) = t qx
dt  dt 
d s(x + t)
= 1−
dt s(x)
 0 
s(x + t) s (x + t)
= − = t px µ(x + t)
s(x) s(x + t)

Example

For a group of lives aged 30 , containing an equal number of smokers and non-smokers, you
are given:
(i) For non-smokers, µ N (x) = 0.08, x ≥ 30
(ii) For smokers, µ S (x) = 0.16, x ≥ 30
Calculate q80 for a life randomly selected from those surviving to age 80 .

Solution.

We have

ST (30) (t) = Pr(T (30) > t | S) Pr(S) + Pr(T (30) > t | N) Pr(N) = 0.5e−0.16t + 0.5e−0.08t .

Hence,
ST (30) (51)
q80 = 1 − P80 = 1 −
ST (30) (50)
0.5e−0.16(51) + 0.5e−0.08(51)
= 1−
0.5e−0.16(50) + 0.5e−0.08(50)
= 1 − 0.922 = 0.078
1.4 Time-Until-Death Random Variable 33

Problem

The CDF of T (x) is given by


(
t
100−x , 0 ≤ t < 100 − x
FT (x) (t) =
1, t ≥ 100 − x
Calculate µ(x + t) for 0 ≤ t < 100 − x.

Problem

Find the hazard rate function of T (x) if X is exponentially distributed with parameter µ.

Problem

You are given the following information: fT (x) (t) = 0.015e−0.015t and t px = e−0.015t . Find µ(x + t)

1.4.5 Mean and Variance of T (x)


Like any random variable, the expected value is defined (using actuarial notation) by
Z ∞

ex = E[T (x)] = t fT (x) (t)dt
0
◦ ◦
ex is called the complete expectation of life at age x. We next derive an expression for ex in terms
of the survival function of X. Indeed, we have
f (x + t)
Z ∞ Z ∞

ex = t fT (x) (t)dt = t dt
0 0 s(x)
1 ∞Z
= t f (x + t)dt
s(x) 0
 
1
Z ∞

= − ts(x + t)|0 + s(x + t)dt
s(x) 0
s(x + t)
Z ∞ Z ∞
= dt = t px dt
0 s(x) 0

Next, the variance of T (x) is given by


T (x)2 − E(T (x)]2
  
Var(T (x)) = E
where
s(x + t)
Z ∞ Z ∞
E[T (x)] = dt = t px dt
0 s(x) 0
and
∞ f (x + t)
 Z Z ∞
E (T (x))2 = t 2 fT (x) (t)dt =

dt
0 0 s(x)
1 ∞ Z
= t 2 f (x + t)dt
s(x) 0
 
1
Z ∞
2 ∞
= − t s(x + t) 0 + 2ts(x + t)dt
s(x) 0
2ts(x + t)
Z ∞ Z ∞
= dt = 2 t · t px dt
0 s(x) 0
34 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Example

The age-at-death random variable is uniformly distributed in [0, 90]. Find e30 .

Solution.

Since X is uniform on [0, 90], T (30) is uniform on [0, 60] and

◦ 0 + 60
e30 = E(T (30)) = = 30
2

Example

Let the age-at-death X be exponential with density function f (x) = 0.05e−0.05x , x ≥ 0 . Cal-
culate the variance of T (x).

Solution.

The CDF is given by


F(x) = 1 − e−0.05x
and the SDF
s(x) = e−0.05x .
Thus, Z ∞
E(T (x)) = e−0.05t dt = 20
0
 Z ∞
E (T (x))2 = 2te−0.05t dt = 80

0
Hence,
Var(T (x)) = 80 − 202 = 40

Problem

The SDF of an age-at-death random variable X is given by


1
s(x) = 0.1(100 − x) 2 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 100.

Find the expected value of T (25).

Problem

The CDF of an age-at-death random variable X is given by


1
F(x) = 1 − 0.1(100 − x) 2 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 100.

Find the variance of T (25).


1.4 Time-Until-Death Random Variable 35

Curtate-future-lifetime

The curtate-future-lifetime of a life aged x, denoted by K(x), is the random variable representing
the number of full years lived after age x. That is, K(x) is the integer part of T (x).

ex = E[K(x)] = ∑ k Pr(K(x) = k)
k=0
= (1 px − 2 px ) + 2 (2 px − 3 px ) + 3 (3 px − 4 px ) + · · ·

= 1 px + 2 px + 3 px + · · · = ∑ kpx
k=1

Example

Suppose that s(x) = e−µx , x ≥ 0. Find ex and ex .

Solution.

We have
s(x + t)
t px = = e−µt
s(x)
1
Z ∞ Z ∞

ex = t px dt = eµt dt =
0 0 µ
∞ ∞
ex = ∑ kpx = ∑ e−µk
k=1 k=1
e−µ
=
1 − e−µ

Example

99−x
You are given px = 100 , x = 90, 91, · · · , 99. Calculate Var[K(96)].

Solution.

First note that q99 = 1 so that the limiting age is 99 . We have


99−96
E[K(96)] = e96 = ∑ kp96 = p96 + 2 p96 + 3 p96
k=1
= p96 + p96 p97 + p96 p97 p98
= 0.3 + 0.3 × 0.2 + 0.3 × 0.20 × 0.10 = 0.366
99−96
= ∑ (2k − 1)k p96 = 1 (1 p96 ) + 3 (2 p96 ) + 5 (3 p96 )
k=1
E K(96)2 = 0.3 + 3(0.3 × 0.2) + 5(0.3 × 0.20 × 0.10) = 0.51
 

Var[K(96)] = E K(96)2 − (E[K(96)])2


 

= 0.51 − 0.3662 = 0.376044


36 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Problem

A survival model has the survival function s(x) = 0.1(100 − x)0.5 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 100 . Find the probability
mass function of K(x).

Problem

x ◦
A survival model has the survival function s(x) = 1 − 100 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 100. Find ex and ex .

Problem

1
Consider a mortality model with the property pk = 2 for all k = 1, 2, · · · . Find ex and Var(K(x)).

1.4.6 Central Death Rates


The central rate of death or the average hazard on the interval [x, x + 1] is the continuous weighted
average of the force of mortality µ(y) with weight function

s(y)
w(y) = R x+1 .
x s(t)dt
We denote the weighted average by
R x+1
x s(y)µ(y)dy
mx = R x+1 .
x s(y)dy

Equivalently we can express mx in terms of f (x) and s(x) by using the fact that f (x) = µ(x)s(x) :
R x+1
f (y)dy
mx = Rxx+1
x s(y)dy

Example

Find mx if X is exponentially distributed with parameter µ.

Solution.

s(x) = e−µx and µ(x) = µ.


Thus, R x+1
µe−µt dt
mx = Rx x+1 =µ
x e−µt dt

Example

1
Assume that the force of mortality follows the DeMoivre’s Law, where µ(x) = 80−x for 0 ≤ x < 80.
Calculate m20 .
1.5 The Life Table Format 37

Solution.

We have R 21 R 21 dy
20 s(y)µ(y)dy 20 80
m20 = R 21 = R 21 y 
20 s(y)dy 20 1 − 80 dy
1
= = 0.01681
80y − 0.5y2 |21
20

Example

You are given that µ = 0.02. Calculate 10 m75 .

Solution.

We have
10 m75 = µ = 0.02

Example

x2
You are given x q0 = 10,000 , 0 < x < 100. Calculate n mx .

Solution.

We have
x2 2x
s(x) = 1 − and µ(x) =
10, 000 10, 000 − x2
Thus, R n x+t
0 5,000 dt
n mx = R n (10,000−(x+t)2 )
0 10,000 dt
Rn
0 2(x + t)dt
= Rn
0 [10, 000 − (x + t)2 ] dt
(x + n)2 − x2
= 3
10, 000n − 13 (x + n)3 + x3
2x + n
= 1
10, 000 − 3 (3x2 + 3nx + n2 )

1.5 The Life Table Format


Non-Select Life Table
The calculation of the relevant probabilities can be simplified by use of life tables.
The life table is a device for calculating probabilities such as t px and t qx using a one-dimensional
array. The key to the definition of a life table is the relationship:

t+s px = t px × s px+t = s px × t px+s


38 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

This result is called the principle of consistency.

1.5.1 Constructing a life table


To construct a life table, we choose a starting age, which will be the lowest age in the table. We
denote this lowest age α.

We also need to choose the highest age in the table, ω, which is the age beyond which sur-
vival is assumed to be impossible. ω is referred to as the limiting age of the table.

We also start with a group of newborns known in the actuarial terminology as the cohort. The
original number of individuals `0 in the cohort is called the radix.

Define
`x as the number of survivors at exact age.
n dx is the expected number of deaths between the ages of x and x + n

n dx = `x − `x+n
We introduce the important notation:

t px = Pr{T (x) > t} = Probability that x survives to age x + t

t qx = Pr{T (x) ≤ t} = Probability that x dies between ages x and x+t


When t = 1, it may be omitted, so that

px = Pr{(x) survives for at least a year }

qx = Pr{(x) dies within a year}


It is clear that, for all t ≥ 0

t px +t qx = 1

and,
s(x + t) lx+t
t px = =
s(x) lx
and
lx+t
t qx = 1−
lx
That is, the (cumulative) distribution function of the variable T is
(
1 − lx+t
lx , if t ≥ 0
F(t) = Pr{T ≤ t} =t qx =
0 , if t < 0

Deferred probabilities

The symbol m | indicates deferment for m years; for example,


1.5 The Life Table Format 39

m |n qx = P{(x) will die between ages x + m and x + m + n}

By elementary probability, this equals Pr{(x) will die before age x+m+n}−Pr{(x) will die before age x+
m}

=m+n qx −m qx
=m px −m+n px
= lx+m −llxx+m+n

That is,
lx+m − lx+m+n
m|n qx =
lx
This may be remembered by the following rule: of lx lives aged x, lx+m − lx+m+n is the (expected)
number of deaths aged between ages x + m and x + m + n.

If n = 1 it may be omitted, so we have

m|qx = Pr{(x) will die between the ages x + m and x + m + 1}

dx+m
=
lx
We remark that there is no such thing as
m|n px

We may also use the result that

m |n qx = Pr{(x) survives to age x + m} · Pr{(x + m) dies within n years }

=m px·n qx+m

Example

Consider the life table

Age `x dx
0 100,000 501
1 99,499 504
2 98,995 506
3 98,489 509
4 97,980 512
5 97,468 514
(a) Find the number of individuals who die between ages 2 and 5.
(b) Find the probability of a life aged 2 to survive to age 4 .

Solution.
40 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

(a) 2 d3 = `2 − `5 = 98, 995 − 97, 468 = 1527.

`4 97,980
(b) 2 p2 = `2 = 98,995 = 0.98975

Example

You are given:


`x = 10000(100 − x)2 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 100

Calculate the probability that a person now aged 20 will reach retirement age of 65 .

Solution.

We have
`65 10000(100 − 65)2
45 p20 = = = 0.1914
`20 10000(100 − 20)2

Example

Using the extract from ELT15 (Males) given above, calculate the values of:
(i) p2
(ii) 2 p3
(iii) 4 q1
(iv) l6

Solution.

(i) p2 = ll32 = 99,086


99,124 = 0.99962 or
p2 = 1 − q2 = 1 − 0.00038 = 0.99962

I5 99,032
(ii) 2 p3 = I3 = 99,086 = 0.99946

(iii) 4 q1 = 1 − 4
p1 = 1 − ll51 = 1 − 99,032
99,186 = 0.00155

(iv) I6 = I5 − d5 = 99, 032 − 22 = 99, 010

Example

x

Given `x = 1000 1 − 105 , determine each of the following:
(a) `0
(b) `35
(c) q20
(d)15 p35
(e)15 q25
(f) The probability that a 30 -year-old dies between ages 55 and 60 .
1.5 The Life Table Format 41

(g) The probability that a 30 -year-old dies after age 70 .

Solution.

0

(a) `0 = 1000 1 − 105 = 1000.
35

(b) `35 = 1000 1 − 105 = 667 (note the answer must be an integer).
(c) q20 = `20`−`
20
21
= 1 − .98824 = .01176.
`50
(d) 15 p35 = `35 = .78571.
(e) 15 q25 = 1 − 15 p25 = 1 − ``25
40
= .1875.
(f) `55`−`
30
60
= .0667.
`70
(g) This is equal to the probability that a 30 -year-old reaches age 70 , which is 40 p30 = `30 = .4667.

Example

Suppose that in a particular life table:

Ix = 100 − x for 0 ≤ x ≤ 100

Calculate the complete expected future lifetime of a life currently aged 50.

Solution.

Using the given expression for Ix :

I50+t 50 − t
t p50 = = for 0 ≤ t ≤ 50
I50 50
We only consider values of t up to 50 , as there is a zero probability of surviving to age 100 in this
life table. So the complete expected future lifetime of a life currently aged 50 is:

1 2 50 1
Z 50 Z 50    
◦ 50 − t 1 2 1 2
e50 − p50 dt − dt − 50t − t − 50 − 50 − 25
0 0 50 50 2 0 50 2

Example

Using ELT15 (Males) mortality, calculate the probability of a 37-year old dying between age
65 and age 75.

Solution.

The required probability is:


I65 − I75
28 | 10q37 =
I37
Looking up the values in the Tables gives:

79, 293 − 53, 266


28 | 10q37 = = 0.26851
96, 933
42 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Example

Use the extract from life table to calculate:


(a) l40
(b)the probability that a life currently aged exactly 30 dies between ages 35 and 36
(c) 10 p30 and
(d) 5 q30

x lx dx
30 10000.00 34.78
31 9965.22 38.10
32 9927.12 41.76
33 9885.35 45.81
34 9839.55 50.26
35 9789.29 55.17
36 9734.12 60.56
37 9673.56 66.49
38 9607.07 72.99
39 9534.08 80.11

Solution.

(a)

l40 = l39 − d39 = 9453.97

(b) This probability is 5| q30 so.

l35 − l36 d33


5| q30 = = = 0.00552
l30 l30

(c)
L40 9453.97
10 p30 = = = 0.94540
I30 10000

(d)
l30 − l33
5 q30 = = 0.02107
l30

Problem

1. Write the symbol for the probability that (52) lives to at least age 77
2. Write the symbol for the probability that a person age 74 dies before age 91
1.5 The Life Table Format 43

3. Write the symbol for probability that (33) dies before age 34.
4. Write the symbol for probability that a person age 43 lives to age 50, but doesn’t survive to age
67
5. Write 5|6 qx

Problem

x
Suppose that s(x) = 1 − 10 , 0 ≤ x ≤ 10.
(a) Find `x .
(b) Using life table terminology, find p2 , q3 , 3 p7 , and 2 q7 .

Problem

Complete the entries in the following table:

x `x dx px qx
0 100,000
1 99,499
2 98,995
3 98,489
4 97,980
5 97,468

1.5.2 Life table functions at non-integer ages


Life table functions such as Ix , qx or µx are usually tabulated at integer ages only, but sometimes we
need to compute probabilities involving non-integer ages or durations, such as 2.5p37.5 . We can do
so using approximate methods. We will show two methods.

Uniform distribution of deaths (UDD)

The first method is based on the assumption that, for integer x and 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, the function t px µx+t
is a constant. Since this is the density (PDF) of the time to death from age x, it is seen that this
assumption is equivalent to a uniform distribution of the time to death, conditional on death falling
between these two ages. Hence it is called the Uniform Distribution of Deaths (or UDD) assumption.

Let x be fixed. We may say there is a uniform distribution of deaths (U.D.D.) between ages
x and x + 1 if, for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1,
lx+t = (1 − t)lx + tlx+1
(i.e. ly is linear for x ≤ y ≤ x + 1 )

This equation may be written in the form

lx+t = lx − tdx (0 ≤ t ≤ 1)

Theorem
The following conditions are each equivalent to the assumption of U.D.D. between ages x and x + 1
:
t qx = t · qx (0 ≤ t ≤ 1)

t px µx+t = qx (0 ≤ t < 1)
44 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Also, using t px = s px × t−s px+s , it can be shown that for integer age x and 0 ≤ s < t ≤ 1 :
(t − s)qx
t−s qx+s =
1 − sqx

Example

In a certain non-select mortality table, there is a uniform distribution of deaths between any
two consecutive integer ages. Find formulae in terms of l30 , l31 and l32 for
(i) 1.5p30.5
(ii) µ30.5

Solution.

l32 l32
(i) l30.5 = 1 since l30+t is linear for 0 < t < 1
2 (l30 +l31 )

q30 l30 −l31 l30 −l31


(ii) t p30 µ30+t = q30 for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, so µ30.5 = 1 = l30 12
= 1
2 p30 2 (l30 +l31 )

Example

Calculate the value of 0.5p55.5 using ELT15 (Females) mortality, assuming a uniform distribution
of deaths between integer ages.

Solution.

Using the UDD assumption, we have:


0.5q55 0.5 × 0.00475
0.5p55.5 = 1 − 0.5 q55.5 = 1 − = 1− = 0.99762
1 − 0.5q55 1 − 0.5 × 0.00475

Example

Calculate the value of 0.5 p55.5 using ELT15 (Females) mortality and linear interpolation, based on
the assumption of a uniform distribution of deaths between integer ages.

Solution.

Using the UDD assumption, we have:


I56 I56 94, 082 94, 082
0.5 p55.5 = = = = = 0.99761
I55.5 0.5I55 + 0.5I56 0.5 × 94, 532 + 0.5 × 94, 082 94, 307
This answer is slightly different from the answer obtained previously for this probability, due to the
fact that the values shown in the Tables are rounded.

Example

Given that q80 = 0.02, calculate 0.6 p80.3 under the assumption of a uniform distribution of deaths.
1.5 The Life Table Format 45

Solution.

We have
`80.9
0.6p80.3 =
`80.3
0.9p80
=
0.3p80
1 − 0.9q80
=
1 − 0.3q80
1 − 0.9(0.02)
= = 0.9879
1 − 0.3(0.02)

Example

Consider the following life table.

Age `x dx
0 100,000 501
1 99,499 504
2 98,995 506
3 98,489 509
4 97,980 512
5 97,468 514
Under the uniform distribution of deaths assumption, calculate
(a) 1.4 q3 and
(b) 1.4 q3.5 .

Solution.

(a) We have
1.4q3 = 1 − 1.4 p3 = 1 − (p3 ) (0.4p4 )
`4
= 1 − · (1 − 0.4q4 )
`3
 
`4 d4
= 1 − · 1 − 0.4
`3 `4
 
97980 512
= 1− · 1 − 0.4 × = 0.0072
98489 97980
(b) We have
1.4q3.5 = 1 − 1.4 p3.5
`4.9
= 1−
`3.5
`4 − 0.9d4
= 1−
`3 − 0.5d3
= 0.007281

Constant Force of Mortality


46 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

The second fractional age assumption says that the force of mortality is constant between in-
teger ages. That is, for integer x ≥ 0 we have µ(x + t) = µx for all 0 ≤ t < 1. The constant µx can
be expressed in terms of px as follows:
R1
px = e− 0 µ(x+t)dt
= e−µx =⇒ µx = − ln px

Further, under the constant force of mortality assumption we can write


Rt t
t px = sT (x) (t) = e− 0 µ(x+s)ds
= e−µxt = eln px = ptx , 0 ≤ t < 1.
= FT (x) (t) = 1 − t px = 1 − ptx = 1 − (1 − qx )t
t qx
d
fT (x) (t) = FT (x) (t) = − ln px ptx = µx ptx = t px µ(x + t).
dt

Example

Consider the following extract from a life table.

Age `x dx
0 100,000 501
1 99,499 504
2 98,995 506
3 98,489 509
4 97,980 512
5 97,468 514
Under the constant force of mortality assumption, find (a) 00.75 p2 and (b) 1.25 p2 .

Solution.

(a) We have
 0.75  0.75
`2 98, 995
0.75 p2 = p0.75
2 = = = 0.9962
`1 99, 499
(b) We have
`4 0.25
  
`3
1.25 p2 = p2 · 0.25 p3 =
`3 `2
  0.25
98, 489 97, 980
= = 0.9936
98, 995 98, 489

Example

You are given


(i) qx = 0.02
(ii) The force of mortality is constant between integer ages. Calculate 0.5 qx+0.25 .

Solution.
1.5 The Life Table Format 47

In general, for s,t > 0 and s + t < 1 we have


Rs
− µx dy
s px+t = e 0 = psx .

Thus,
0.5 qx+0.25 = 1 − 0.5 px+0.25 = 1 − p0.5
x = 1 − (1 − 0.02)
0.5
= 0.01

Example

The life table is given as follows

x qx
26 0.0213
27 0.0232
28 0.0254
Find the probability that (26.5) will survive to age 28.25 under
(i)) the UDD assumption
(ii) the constant-force assumption

Solution.

We have
28.25−26.5 p26.5 = 1.75 p26.5 = 0.5 p26.5 p270.25 p28 .
(i) Under the UDD assumption, we have

0.5q26 0.5(0.0213)
0.5 p26.5 = 1 − 0.5 q26.5 = 1 − = 1− = 0.989235
1 − 0.5q26 1 − 0.5(0.0213)
p27 = 1 − q27 = 1 − 0.0232 = 0.9768
0.25 p28 = 1 − 0.25 q28 = 1 − 0.25q28 = 1 − 0.25(0.0254) = 0.99365
1.75 p26.5 = (0.989235)(0.9768)(0.99365) = 0.960149.
(ii) Under the constant force of mortality, we have
0.5
= 1 − 0.5 q26.5 = 1 − 1 − p0.5 0.5

0.5 p26.5 26 = p26 = (1 − q26 ) = 0.989293
p27 = 1 − q27 = 1 − 0.0232 = 0.9768
0.25 p28 = (1 − q28 )0.25 = (1 − 0.0254)0.25 = 0.993589
1.75 p26.5 = (0.989293)(0.9768)(0.993589) = 0.960145.

Example

Calculate 3 p62.5 based on PFA92C20 mortality using:


(i) the CFM assumption
(ii) the UDD assumption.
48 Chapter 1. Actuarial Survival Models

Solution.

First of all, we can split up the probability at integer ages as follows:

3 p62.5 = 0.5 p62.5 × 2 p63 × 0.5p65

Looking up values from PFA92C20 in the Tables:


l65 9, 703.708
2 p63 = = = 0.992617
l63 9, 775.888
(i) Under the constant force of mortality assumption:

0.5 p62.5 = (p62 )0.5 = (1 − q62 )0.5 = (1 − 0.002885)0.5 = 0.998556

Also:
0.5 p65 = (p65 )0.5 = (1 − q65 )0.5 = (1 − 0.004681)0.5 = 0.997657
So, overall:
3 p62.5 = 0.998556 × 0.992617 × 0.997657 = 0.988861
(ii) Under the UDD assumption:
0.5q62 0.5 × 0.002885
0.5 p62.5 = 1 − 0.5 q62.5 = 1 − = 1− = 0.998555
1 − 0.5q62 1 − 0.5 × 0.002885
and: 0.5 p65 = 1 − 0.5 q65 = 1 − 0.5q65 = 1 − 0.5 × 0.004681 = 0.997660 So overall:

3 p62.5 = 0.998555 × 0.992617 × 0.997660 = 0.988863

Alternatively, assuming UDD, we could take the following approach:


l65.5 0.5l65 + 0.5l66
3 p62.5 = =
l62.5 0.5l62 + 0.5l63
0.5(9, 703.708 + 9, 658.285) 9, 680.9965
= = = 0.988863
0.5(9, 804.173 + 9, 775.888) 9, 790.0305

Example

In a certain population, the force of mortality equals 0.025 at all ages. (We are assuming here that
there is no upper limit to age.)
Calculate:
(i) the probability that a new-born baby will survive to age 5
(ii) the probability that a life aged exactly 10 will die before age 12
(iii) the probability that a life aged exactly 5 will die between ages 10 and 12

Solution.

(i)
 Z5 
p
5 0 = exp − 0.025dt = e−0.125 = 0.88250
0
1.5 The Life Table Format 49

(ii)
 Z2 
2 q10 = 1 − 2 p10 = 1 − exp − 0.025dt = 1 − e−0.05 = 0.04877
0

(iii)

5|2 q5 = 5 p5 × 2 q10 = e−0.125 × 0.04877 = 0.88250 × 0.04877 = 0.04304

Problem

You are given:


(i) p90 = 0.75
(ii) a constant force of mortality between integer ages.
Calculate 1 q90 and 1 q90+ 11 .
12 12 12

Problem

You are given:


(i) qx = 0.1
(ii) a constant force of mortality between integer ages.
Calculate 0.5 qx and 0.5 qx+0.5 .

Select mortality Table

We now consider the situation when mortality rates (or the force of mortality ) depend on two
factors: (i) age, and (ii) the time (duration) since a certain event, known as “selection”.

Select rates are usually studied by modelling the force of mortality µ as a function of the age at
joining the population and the duration since joining the population. The usual notation is:
[x] + r age at date of transition
[x] age at date of joining population
r duration from date of joining the population until date of transition
µ{x]+r the transition rate (force of mortality) at exact duration r having joined the population at
age [x]
l[x]+r expected number of lives alive at duration r having joined the population at age [x], based
on some assumed radix

You might also like