Tran 1
Lucy Tran
Mr. Ben
Science 7.4
5 June 2025
2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Sumatra, Indonesia
On Boxing Day, 2004, Sumatra, an island in Indonesia, encountered a 9.3 magnitude
earthquake, triggering a fatal tsunami, taking many lives and destroying homes. The vicious tsunamis
caused infrastructure to collapse, leaving many to start their lives from the beginning, and the whole
island to rebuild and rehabilitate infrastructure and services from the start. However, scientific proposals
and solutions developed by researchers have given the tsunami victims hope to reduce the severity of the
outcome of the natural disaster. Some solutions help prepareness and some increase protection; the
dynamic Self-Powered Movable seawall (SMS) prevents the inland from large and destructive waves.
Let us evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this solution from an economic perspective.
Nevertheless, before digging deep into the positives and negatives, the process of tsunamis occurring
should be understood. Tsunamis are large waves from the ocean caused by earthquakes under the ocean.
Convergent plate boundaries are when tectonic plates move towards each other; and subduction is a
type of convergent plate boundary. Subduction zones are created when the oceanic plate subducts under
the adjacent, denser plate called the continental plate. Earthquakes tend to occur at subduction zones
because when the plates move, they often get stuck, and it when it finally releases, there is a release of
energy from the slip of a “strike-slip” and from the rupture, causing seismic waves to travel through the
crust and an earthquake to occur (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). Connecting to
tsunamis, seismic events caused by seismic waves, cause the lithosphere to move and vibrate, displacing
a large volume of water above. The displacement causes a vertical movement of the water, creating
potential energy. Then, it transfers to kinetic energy when the water propagates due to gravity and its
Tran 2
attempt to regain balance, generating enormous waves that travel violently in many different directions
across the ocean. These natural disasters regularly occur 78% in the Pacific Ocean, specifically the Ring
of Fire (NOAA, “Tsunami Locations”). The scientific explanation for why tsunami tends to occur in this
area is that the Ring of Fire includes many subduction zones, increasing the movement of tectonic plates
at fault lines, plate boundaries, and trenches. The movement of tectonic plates causes strike-slip
occurrences, causing earthquakes that trigger tsunamis. Therefore, since Indonesia lies on the Ring of
Fire, this country encounters tsunamis, earthquakes, and volcanoes more often than other countries that
are not in this region.
The effects of tsunamis on humans and the environment are loss of life, destruction of property
and infrastructure, economic disruption, pollution, habitat destruction, water contamination… The high,
forceful, and fast waves are overwhelming and can easily drown people, and the collapsed debris carried
by the tsunami waves and rubble has extreme force and pressure, leading to physical trauma from
fractures to open wounds and even casualties. Homes of innocent people, buildings, bridges, ports, and
other vital infrastructure in Indonesia’s environment and economy were damaged, creating displacement
and economic hardships for the citizens and government. Debris from waves destroys sewage systems and
filters, contaminating clean freshwater and creating health risks. Key economic aspects such as
agriculture, fishery businesses, and tourism will face challenges like contamination and habitat
destruction, restraining financial income. Therefore, scientists and researchers have developed solutions
to minimize the impact of natural disasters in Sumatra. The dynamic SMS seawall proposal has
minimized impacts by securing the ports and infrastructure at the coast, which means the seawall is
engineered and designed to resist substantial hydrodynamic forces (motion and forces of fluids)
generated by tsunamis. The seawall has gates that use microtidal energy to develop their power to raise
the gates from the seafloor. It forms a barrier from tsunami waves that have buoyant forces and
structural robustness (the ability to tolerate heavy damage) help withdraw the violent impact of waves
Tran 3
and water pressure that destroy homes, take lives, and collapse critical infrastructure (Takagi,
“Self-Powered Movable Seawall for Tsunami Protection and Emergency Power Generation”). Overall, the
SMS barrier offers a sustainable and strong tsunami prevention solution with a high potential for adopting
this worthwhile solution/technology worldwide. Still, regarding ideas, solutions, and proposals, there
must be advantages and disadvantages that will be further extended in the following paragraphs.
When evaluating the solution of SMS dynamic seawall from the economic perspective, the first
positive impact of using seawalls is that they have high resistance and mitigation to tsunami waves,
benefiting locals, infrastructure, and businesses by increasing protection. According to the Japan News,
the SMS seawall has undergone testing at locations like Japan’s Nankai Trough region, where the
tsunamis have violent hydrodynamic force and wave speeds of 700km per hour. The testing had
promising results and protection due to the robust and buoyant construction against the wave impact
forces (森). Based on the evidence, the tsunami in Sumatra in 2004 also had waves with speeds around
700 km per hour (Britannica). Therefore, the SMS seawall would likely withstand the forceful and
rigorous waves of the fast waves. This solution especially helps people in Sumatra because they had a
very short period to prepare and flee; therefore, this seawall is self-powered, it can sustain large and
powerful volumes of water, reduce the significant kinetic energy the waves carry, and block the waves
from entering the shore/ports. Specifically, the seawall deploys vertical gates that generate a hydraulic
barrier that resists the hydrodynamic pressures and intense forces. The gates are lowered only when the
waves propagate, so they protect coastal infrastructures and homes from destruction. With structural
protection, the government does not have to raise taxes on citizens to rebuild and rehabilitate the
infrastructure after severe damage, benefiting the citizens and the government. Therefore, the SMS
seawall benefits Indonesia’s economy by avoiding spending millions on rebuilding homes and structures
every five years, when a tsunami strikes the area.
Another positive impact of my solution is that the SMS seawall provides energy during energy
Tran 4
outages due to tsunami impacts using turbines. According to the International Center for Urban Safety
Engineering Institute of Industrial Science, the University of Tokyo, it took Sumatra roughly two weeks to
get electricity and energy running and repaired, significantly slowing down the recovery and causing
anxiety for survivors attempting to contact relatives or emergency aid (Meguro). Sumatra suffers from the
loss of power due to communication limitations, logistics, and lack of emergency responses; however,
with the implementation of the SMS seawall, electricity from microtidal energy will allow citizens to
have electricity to use while the government and services have more time to fix the destroyed energy
sources and electricity systems thoroughly. Scientifically, when the gates rise, the movement utilizes the
difference in water levels between the outside and inside of the gates to create movement and flow in the
water that drives turbines. The movement of the turbines is kinetic energy, and it can be
transferred/converted to electricity. With this source of energy, financial losses can be reduced by
generating surplus energy that is stored and used as emergency power during outages, maintaining
operations with emergency services and the government can avoid costly emergency repairs. This benefits
Indonesia’s financial status because the microtidal energy can be a sustainable alternative for the energy
source used before the destruction of the tsunami. It will help the developing country’s government
manage more critical circumstances, like saving lives instead of worrying about repairing. Plus, repairing
an energy source this large that runs through the city in a short time is extremely costly; therefore,
integrating the SMS seawall also provides renewable energy that minimizes the repair expenses for
immediate service. Overall, the SMS barrier offers a sustainable and strong tsunami prevention solution,
with other advantages when these disasters occur, creating the potential for this worthwhile
solution/technology to be adopted.
When evaluating a scientific solution, we also have to think about the negative consequences.
One negative economic consequence of using SMS seawalls from tsunamis is that it is difficult for a
developing country like Indonesia to afford to develop and construct. Based on statistics from Science
Tran 5
Direct, building one seawall alone costs $10,000 to $100,000, depending on the size, material, and design,
without considering labor and other expenses (Takagi et al.). Thousands of dollars is a large amount of
money, especially for a developing country to spend. Since Japan is a highly developed country with an
excellent and secure economy and GDP, this nation can afford to build these seawalls. On the other hand,
Indonesia is still a developing country and does not have a steady economic and financial status;
therefore, the money to pay for the construction and planning of this proposal will take a significant
proportion of the country’s GDP. In addition, Indonesia is the sixth country with the most islands in the
world, with 17,508 islands (“Indonesian Islands”). Since Indonesia lies on the Ring of Fire, this country is
more prone to earthquakes, and all islands will be affected by these tsunamis, regardless of their location
near the epicenter. It is tough for a developing country with countless islands to build many seawalls
because it would take a large proportion of its economy. Building small, average-quality seawalls for
every island would cost at least 175 million dollars, which is a large amount of money for even a
developed country. Therefore, this solution is complex for the developing country Indonesia to bring to
life and utilize since it is costly to test a new idea/solution requiring lots of research and construction.
Another negative economic impact of implementing SMS seawalls is that the construction and
implementation are not fully certified and definite for usage. According to Science Direct, 33 out of 56
ports in Japan were not feasible for the SMS seawall, 59% of the testing locations (Takagi et al.). Based
on the statistics, the ports were not feasible to the SMS seawall because they had too small tidal ranges or
a deficiency of microtidal energy that is required for electricity and for gates to rise and lower. Indonesia
has a mix of high and low tidal rates, making it difficult to determine the seawall's ability, increasing the
unfeasibility rate (Takagi et al.). Therefore, if the location is not feasible or the construction has some
failures, millions of dollars would go to waste. As a developing country, Indonesia does not have the
money and finances to test a solution that has a high chance of not succeeding. Scientists and researchers
are unsure of how long it will take to complete this barrier and what challenges will be encountered,
Tran 6
limiting and delaying the process of planning and construction. Since this solution has not been tested, the
design may not be successful, and the money put into the project will be lost. This is not beneficial to
countries, especially developing countries like Indonesia, because to ensure there is enough money for the
project, the tax increases, creating more difficulties for local residents financially, especially the ones who
have low incomes. Overall, the implementation of the SMS seawall has uncertain results, creating risks to
Indonesia’s economy.
After rigorous evaluation of the Self-Powered Movable seawall, I believe the positive outweighs
the negative. This is because saving lives and homes always surpasses the importance of economic and
financial losses because they are irreplaceable and humans are the foundation of economic success.
Saving homes by implementing the seawall protection and providing electricity for communication with
emergency aid is more vital than economic losses because homes provide critical shelter, security, and
stability for individuals and families, which is fundamental to their well-being and recovery after
tsunamis. They need homes and essentials before they can contribute and help improve the economy. In
addition, implementing the SMS seawall removes the expenses for infrastructure repairs because the
seawall prevent the rigorous tsunamis from entering inland. Plus, preserving lives stablizes and maintains
workforce, societies, and community resilience critical for economic recovery and development. In
conclusion, eventhough integrating the Self-Powered Movable seawall may have negative aspects but
increasing the protection of infrastructure and lives during natural disasters strongly outweighs all the
negatives because they are the fundamentals of economic growth and development.
Tran 7
Glossary
Tsunami: Violent ocean waves caused by earthquakes or volcanic eruptions.
Microtidal energy: Kinetic energy produced by the rise and fall of tides.
Earthquake: The movement in the crust of tectonic plates that can cause great damage.
Convergent plate boundary: Two tectonic plates colliding into each other, with the denser plate
forcefully going under the other (subduction), or they collide towards each other to create mountain
ranges.
Subduction: When the continental plate imbricates the oceanic plate due to higher density.
Strike-slip: Two tectonic plates get stuck, which can create friction and potential energy. When it
terminates and releases suddenly, the earth shifts and creates an earthquake suddenly.
Seismic waves: Waves of energy in the ground, causing areas to have high seismic activity such as,
earthquakes and volcano eruption.
Tectonic plates: They are apart of the the lithospshere, with both continental and oceanic crust.
Fault lines: A crack/break in the crust/Earth’s surface.
Magnitude: The measure of the size/strength of an earthquake.
Ring of Fire: A location in the Pacific Ocean with a high concentration of seismic activity due to its
many plate boundaries and subduction zones.
Trench: A V-shaped depression in the seafloor due to subduction of tectonic plates.
Infrastructure: The basic physical facilities and structures required in society.
Self-Powered Movable Seawall (SMS): A seawall system that can protect inland from tsunami waves
Tran 8
with its own abilities to move and produce energy.
Seismic events: Earthquakes and vibrations caused by seismic waves.
Lithosphere: The rigid outer layer of the Earth, containing of the crust and upper mantle.
Potential energy: Stored energy.
Kinetic energy: Energy due to its motion.
Hydrodynamic forces: Forces generated by the motion of fluids.
Buoyant forces: The force by the fluid and weight of the object allowing the object to float.
Structural robustness: The ability to withstand severe destruction.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): The total amount of value/money of trade goods and services produced
by a country.
Feasibility: The suitability to a certain thing.
Epicenter: The point of the crust, highlighting the starting point of the earthquake.
Tran 9
Works Cited
Britannica. “Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004.” Encyclopædia Britannica, 19 Dec. 2018,
www.britannica.com/event/Indian-Ocean-tsunami-of-2004.
Cornell, Sean. “Case Study: Sumatra and Thailand and the 2004 Tsunami | Coastal Processes, Hazards,
and Society.” Www.e-Education.psu.edu, www.e-education.psu.edu/earth107/node/1657.
Friedman, Jed. “Resilience and Recovery Ten Years after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami: A Summary of
Results from the STAR Project.” World Bank Blogs, 18 Dec. 2014,
blogs.worldbank.org/en/impactevaluations/resilience-and-recovery-ten-years-after-2004-indian-o
cean-tsunami-summary-results-star-project.
Grant, Mitchell. “How Much Does It Cost to Build a Seawall? [2024 Data].” Angi, 19 Mar. 2024,
www.angi.com/articles/how-much-does-it-cost-to-build-seawall.htm.
“Indonesian Islands.” Twinkl.com.vn, 2025, www.twinkl.com.vn/teaching-wiki/indonesian-islands.
Accessed 5 June 2025.
Meguro, Kimiro. Report on the 2004 Sumatra Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster. 2005,
icus.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/8_report-on-the-2004-sumatra-earthquake..
2005-01.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2025.
Myers, Scott. “The Advantages and Disadvantages of Seawalls.” Blog.duncanseawall.com, 19 Sept. 2022,
blog.duncanseawall.com/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-seawalls.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “The Science behind Tsunamis.” Noaa.gov, 2014,
www.noaa.gov/explainers/science-behind-tsunamis.
“Natural Disasters in Indonesia - Tsunami, Earthquakes & Volcanoes | Indonesia Investments.”
Www.indonesia-Investments.com, 3 Sept. 2018,
www.indonesia-investments.com/business/risks/natural-disasters/item243?
Tran 10
NOAA. “Tsunami Generation: Earthquakes.” Www.noaa.gov, 27 Sept. 2023,
www.noaa.gov/jetstream/tsunamis/tsunami-generation-earthquakes.
---. “Tsunami Locations.” Www.noaa.gov, 10 Apr. 2023,
www.noaa.gov/jetstream/tsunamis/tsunami-locations.
Press, BGS. “Twenty Years On: The Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunami - British Geological Survey.”
British Geological Survey, 26 Dec. 2024,
www.bgs.ac.uk/news/twenty-years-on-the-indian-ocean-earthquake-and-tsunami/.
PreventionWeb Editors. “Tsunami-Proofing the Future: Seven Smart Solutions to Shape Safer Shores.”
Undrr.org, 6 Nov. 2024,
tsunamiday.undrr.org/news/tsunami-proofing-future-seven-smart-solutions-shape-safer-shores.
森. “Nankai Trough Megaquake Tsunami Could Hit in 2 Minutes; Japan Authorities Urge Caution after
Recent Earthquake.” Yomiuri.co.jp, The Japan News, 13 Aug. 2024,
japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/original/perspectives/20240813-204771/.
Takagi, Hiroshi, et al. “Feasibility of a Self-Powered Movable Seawall Using Microtidal Energy in
Japan.” Renewable Energy, vol. 219, Dec. 2023, p. 119563,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119563.
---. “Japan: Movable Seawall for Tsunami Protection and Power Generation | PreventionWeb.”
Www.preventionweb.net, 30 Jan. 2024,
www.preventionweb.net/news/self-powered-movable-seawall-tsunami-protection-and-emergency
-power-generation.
---. “Self-Powered Movable Seawall for Tsunami Protection and Emergency Power Generation.” Tokyo
Institute of Technology, www.titech.ac.jp/english/news/2024/068385.