TYPE STUDENT LAST NAME TYPE SHORTENED TITLE PAGE 1

RESPONSE PAPER
LAST NAME: ASONG
FIRST NAME: ABELT LEKE
PROGRAM CODE: Type PROGRAM CODE
COURSE CODE: Type COURSE CODE
PERIOD NUMBER: Type PERIOD NUMBER
INSTRUCTOR: Type INSTRUCTOR LAST NAME

Edit or delete text to show actual information below:

The author applied XUS ☐UK conventions of grammar, usage, and mechanics (only keep US or UK)
The student must use Turabian/Chicago parenthetical/in-text references (ideally with Zotero) and confirm below:
The author X did ☐did not use Zotero to insert references (remove unneeded text to indicate)
The author X did ☐did not use Grammarly Premium (provided by EUCLID) (remove unneeded text)
My plagiarism rate (per Grammarly Premium) is: xx%
The author used the following software: (e.g., MSWord 2016 on Windows 8)

List your 7 key concepts with page number in text (then bold these terms in your RP)(samples below):
1. Evidence-based policy (Austin 2007, 12-16)
2. PERI (Austin 2007, 24)
3. Multiple factors (Austin 2007, 31-34)
4. Externality (Austin 2007, 40)
5. Complex causality (Austin 2007, 51-55)
6. Retrospective cohort (Austin 2007, 61-64)
7. AFM (Austin 2007, 73)

WRITE TITLE GIVEN TO RP

1) INTRODUCTION
A step-by-step guide to monitoring and evaluation is a foundational component of
the broader monitoring and evaluation (M&E) framework. After reviewing this
document, I now understand the sequential process involved in conducting effective
M&E. The case study in the guide significantly reinforces these steps and enhances the
practical application of the concepts. Building on the MME 450 course materials, this
reading deepens my understanding and supports my continued learning. Notably, it
emphasizes monitoring and evaluation as a form of action research—an iterative process
involving planning, action, and reflection. To ensure M&E efforts are relevant and
effective, it is essential to establish guiding principles that provide direction and
coherence. This response paper will outline the step-by-step process of monitoring and
evaluation, incorporating examples from my professional experience and daily
interactions with program and project staff.
TYPE STUDENT LAST NAME TYPE SHORTENED TITLE PAGE 2

2) WHY DO M & E

a) Assess and demonstrate effectiveness in achieving

objectives
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is a critical component of program
implementation and assessment that continues to gain traction in the field of
development. In Canada, while M&E is widely recognized and applied in development
work, the rationale behind its development and implementation is often
underemphasized, even within government agencies and organizations. Several
challenges contribute to the limited uptake of M&E. Some organizations perceive M&E
as time-consuming, costly to establish and maintain, or beyond their existing capacity. As
a result, M&E is sometimes treated as a formality rather than a meaningful process for
learning and improvement. However, it is essential for organizations to fully understand
the benefits of M&E before integrating it into their operations. M&E provides the tools to
assess and demonstrate whether a program is achieving its intended objectives and
making a measurable impact on the target population. For instance, consider a program
designed to provide access to potable drinking water in a community with the goal of
improving public health by reducing cases of typhoid, which are linked to unsafe water
consumption. For the program to prove its effectiveness, it must establish a clear link
between typhoid incidence and contaminated water, ruling out other contributing factors
such as poor sanitation or hygiene practices. Without this targeted evaluation, the
provision of clean water alone may not result in the desired health outcomes. In essence,
effective M&E allows organizations to determine whether their interventions are meeting
the actual needs of the community and to make informed decisions to enhance program
impact.

b) Improvement
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) plays a vital role in enhancing programs
within an organization. Through the M&E process, information is systematically
collected, analyzed, interpreted, reported, and disseminated to promote learning and drive
improvements in future projects. As noted by [Author, 2016, p. 4], M&E helps to
“improve internal learning and decision-making about project design, how the group
operates, and implementation—namely, identifying success factors, barriers, and
effective approaches.” By identifying success factors early in the program cycle,
organizations can capture critical data that supports informed decision-making. During
the monitoring phase, tracking key milestones is essential for making timely adjustments
that may influence the program’s overall outcomes. M&E provides insights into what is
working and what is not, allowing organizations to adapt and refine their strategies
accordingly. Ultimately, such improvements are only possible when a robust M&E
framework is established—ideally from the outset of a program—to guide its
implementation and ensure ongoing effectiveness.
TYPE STUDENT LAST NAME TYPE SHORTENED TITLE PAGE 3

c) Empower and motivate volunteers and supporters

One of the key benefits of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is its ability to
strengthen team capacity through training, skill-building, and knowledge transfer. As
M&E systems are developed and implemented, team members are assigned specific roles
and responsibilities, enhancing their understanding of program processes and boosting
their professional growth. Sharing M&E findings openly helps volunteers and supporters
see the real impact of their contributions. It also creates opportunities to learn from both
successes and challenges, fostering a deeper connection to the initiative’s broader goals.
Recognizing team and individual achievements through data-driven outcomes boosts
morale and builds a culture of trust, accountability, and shared purpose. My experience
with UNHCR highlighted the importance of communication, accountability, and
feedback as core elements of global operations. Establishing inclusive feedback and
complaint mechanisms not only ensures that community voices are heard but also
empowers volunteers by validating their role in shaping programs. This participatory
approach enhances motivation, strengthens engagement, and encourages sustained
involvement. Involving volunteers in the M&E process—through feedback meetings,
participatory evaluations, or outcome discussions—not only increases their sense of
ownership but also supports continuous learning and long-term commitment to program
success.

d) Ensure accountability to key stakeholders

Stakeholders play a significant role in shaping the outcomes of a program. They can be
categorized as either internal or external. Internal stakeholders typically include members
of the project team who are directly involved in implementing program activities.
External stakeholders encompass beneficiaries, funders, and partner organizations that
contribute to the program’s success, either directly or indirectly. Ensuring accountability
among all stakeholders fosters transparency, builds trust, and strengthens cooperation—
key elements for achieving sustainable and effective program outcomes.

3) AGREEING ON SOME GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Effective information collection is essential for supporting decision-making and
improving outcomes in program implementation. To ensure that monitoring and
evaluation (M&E) efforts are practical and aligned with available resources, data
collection should be focused and feasible. This means prioritizing the collection of
information that is essential to the success of the program—what is truly needed, rather
than expending time and resources on data that would merely be nice to know. When
M&E is streamlined in this way, it supports rather than diverts resources from core
program activities. Information gathered should also be timely and relevant, enabling
teams to enhance group learning, inform decision-making processes, and refine project
design in real time. Timeliness ensures that data can be acted upon when it matters most,
thereby increasing its utility and impact.
TYPE STUDENT LAST NAME TYPE SHORTENED TITLE PAGE 4

Moreover, the data collected should be usable not only within the organization but
also by other stakeholders. When information is comparable with data from other
organizations or sectors, it contributes to a broader evidence base, facilitating
collaboration and shared learning across programs and contexts. Credibility, validity, and
reliability are also crucial characteristics of good data. While it may not always be
possible to achieve high levels of rigor due to limited resources, efforts should be made to
ensure that information is as accurate and trustworthy as possible within the given
constraints. Importantly, the process of information collection must be sensitive to power
imbalances. It is essential to include voices that are often marginalized or excluded from
decision-making processes. This includes actively listening to individuals and groups
within communities who may lack influence or visibility, ensuring that their perspectives
inform program development and evaluation. All data collection must adhere to ethical
standards, particularly regarding informed consent and data protection. Participants must
understand how their information will be used and have confidence that their privacy and
rights will be respected throughout the process. Information collection in program
implementation should be strategic, actionable, inclusive, and ethical.

4) DECIDING WHICH PROGRAMS/PROJECTS YOU

NEED TO MONITOR
It is vital to identify which program I intend to monitor from the outset when
designing a program or project. During program scoping, factors such as program
requirements, deliverables, and the operational context help determine the need and
feasibility of monitoring a specific program. Programs operating in highly volatile
environments may demand more substantial resources for effective monitoring and
evaluation. Prioritization is critical, especially since it is often unrealistic to secure
funding to monitor or evaluate all programs or all components within a program.
Additionally, understanding the program’s duration allows for better planning and
allocation of monitoring resources throughout the lifecycle of the program. It is important
to remember that monitoring is an ongoing process, while evaluation typically occurs
after an activity or phase is completed. For this reason, careful consideration must be
given to selecting which programs or projects to monitor in order to make the most
efficient use of available resources, time, and opportunities.

5) DECIDING WHO TO INVOLVE IN THE DIFFERENT

STAGES OF M & E
During the scoping phase of a Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) program, it is
essential to identify who should be involved at each stage of the process. Stakeholders
play a critical role in determining the success or failure of a program. Internal
stakeholders—those directly involved in executing the program—are responsible for
carrying out specific tasks to ensure the program’s success. In my role as a program
specialist, I was once tasked with coordinating an outreach program. The integration of a
TYPE STUDENT LAST NAME TYPE SHORTENED TITLE PAGE 5

RACI matrix into the outreach plan made it significantly easier to track responsibilities
and ensure timely task completion. Clearly defining who is Responsible, Accountable,
consulted, and informed reduced confusion and established effective communication
among team members. External stakeholders, including partners and program
beneficiaries, also play an essential role in shaping program outcomes. Therefore, it is
important to define their roles early in the program’s development. For example, I was
assigned to coordinate a grant launch activity, which required collaboration with external
stakeholders to develop the functionalities of the grant platform. I also worked closely
with beneficiaries to ensure the grant program addressed their needs. Clearly identifying
each stakeholder’s role contributed to the project’s success and minimized resource
wastage. It is vital to identify stakeholders early in program planning and categorize them
according to importance and influence on the program to have significant input from their
participation. Also, understanding stakeholders’ perspectives and getting their buy-in on
the type of evaluation questions will help address key concerns and priorities. Workshops
provide a structured environment where stakeholders can openly discuss and agree on
what aspects of the program should be evaluated. This helps build a shared understanding
and ensures the evaluation aligns with everyone’s priorities and expectations.

6) DECIDE ON THE KEY ISSUES AND QUESTIONS YOU

WANT TO INVESTIGATE
An essential step in any Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) process is the
identification of the key issues and questions that the organization seeks to understand
and learn from. This step is crucial, as it guides what will be monitored and ensures that
the data collected is meaningful and relevant to the program’s goals. Often, the issues and
questions to be explored are internal to the organization or group. One central area of
focus is organizational capacity and internal group processes. Monitoring in this area
involves examining how effectively the group is functioning in terms of accessing and
utilizing necessary resources, such as human, financial, and technical assets. It also
includes evaluating the quality of leadership and the clarity of the group’s vision.
Furthermore, good management practices are essential to monitor, including the extent to
which roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, whether the organization remains
adaptable to change, and how effectively it is achieving its objectives. Cost-effectiveness
is another critical internal issue, requiring the organization to assess whether it is using its
resources efficiently to achieve its desired outcomes. Sustainability, both financial and in
terms of human resources (e.g., volunteer fatigue), must also be evaluated to ensure the
long-term viability of the organization’s efforts. Beyond internal operations, joint
working with external parties is another area that merits close monitoring. This includes
assessing how well the organization collaborates with partners, engages in wider
networks or movements, and contributes to alliances or coalitions. It is also essential to
examine the extent to which the organization is sharing best practices and effective
techniques with others, thereby strengthening collective impact and mutual learning.
Evaluation questions are identified before the evaluation approaches are developed. The
approach used in evaluation determines the types of questions that will be created.
Developing evaluation questions is an interactive process because of the changing
TYPE STUDENT LAST NAME TYPE SHORTENED TITLE PAGE 6

priority needs of the program. The evaluator develops the first draft of the evaluation
questions before presenting them to the stakeholders. The timing of data collection in
program evaluation is vital to capturing relevant and accurate information. Data should
be collected at specific stages of the program lifecycle to address different evaluation
objectives. If staff members involved with collecting and analyzing data have been
involved in developing the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework, they will be better
prepared for and engaged with its implementation

In summary, identifying and monitoring these internal and collaborative issues

enables organizations to not only assess their performance but also to adapt, improve, and
sustain their efforts over time. By asking the right questions and focusing on the right
areas, organizations can create meaningful change and foster continuous learning within
and beyond their own structures.

7) CLARIFYING YOUR AIMS, OBJECTIVES, ACTIVITIES,

AND PATHWAYS TO CHANGE
In order to effectively assess progress in any program or initiative, it is essential
to begin with a clear understanding of what one is trying to achieve and how one plans to
achieve it. This involves articulating the aims, objectives, and planned activities. While
this is not a detailed planning guide, establishing a well-defined strategy is foundational
to successful Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E). The process begins with clarifying
long-term goals, or aims, and then working backwards to identify the outcomes, outputs,
activities, and inputs that will lead to those goals. Aims, or desired impacts, refer to the
broader, long-term changes that the organization hopes to bring about—typically
improvements in people’s lives, communities, or the environment. For example, an
organization may aim to reduce community carbon emissions, contribute to a more
equitable and sustainable society, or enhance overall well-being. To achieve these
broader aims, organizations must set specific objectives, or desired outcomes. Objectives
define the intermediate changes that must occur to realize the larger impact. These might
include increasing personal agency, promoting more sustainable lifestyles, enhancing
community resilience, or advocating for supportive government policies. Objectives help
to translate abstract aims into more tangible and measurable goals. Supporting the
achievement of objectives are outputs—the direct, immediate results of program
activities. Outputs are often quantifiable and directly linked to what the organization
does. For instance, engaging a certain number of participants in events or training
sessions, planting a specific number of trees, or facilitating the exchange of goods at
community events are all examples of outputs. The actions that generate these outputs are
referred to as activities. These are the specific programs, projects, and processes carried
out to achieve the desired changes. Examples include community engagement campaigns,
awareness-raising efforts, workshops on energy conservation, or neighborhood initiatives
focused on food security and waste reduction.

Finally, to implement these activities, organizations must secure the necessary

inputs. These are the human, financial, technical, organizational, and social resources
TYPE STUDENT LAST NAME TYPE SHORTENED TITLE PAGE 7

required to support the work. Examples of inputs include volunteer time, access to
technology and digital platforms, or funding secured for operational and programmatic
needs. By clearly defining each of these elements—aims, objectives, outputs, activities,
and inputs—organizations can construct a logical framework that not only guides
implementation but also forms the foundation for effective monitoring and evaluation.
This clarity allows for more accurate tracking of progress, improved decision-making,
and a better understanding of how and why certain outcomes are achieved.

8) IDENTIFYING WHAT INFORMATION YOU NEED TO

COLLECT
Data collection is the systematic collection of information, including numbers and
statements. Information collected is examined, cleaned, transformed, and interpreted
during data analysis to uncover helpful information. Ensuring that data is regularly
captured in the reporting process is recommended with the participation of stakeholders.
The first step in developing a data collection plan is confirming the data requirement and
the processes for data collection related to the monitoring and evaluation plans. The data
monitoring and evaluation plan will identify the different data requirements and
collection methods for monitoring and evaluation. It is important to review the data to be
collected by the organization to determine its accuracy and validity. Experienced
organizations might already have significant data to draw from, while new organizations
might have to collect data from scratch. Some data tools that might be considered include
survey instruments, workshop plans, semi-structured interview guides, and focused group
guides. Data collected is sensitive information that must be managed with diligence. If a
program evaluation includes qualitative data, the focus shifts to understanding the
context, experiences, and perceptions surrounding the program. Numeric information is
quantitative data used in making decisions to improve efficiency. The data collection plan
should include the purpose, focus, sampling, implementation, potential ethical issues, and
required development.

9) DECIDING HOW YOU WILL COLLECT THE

INFORMATION
As part of the monitoring process, it is essential to identify the data sources that
will be collected. The evaluator should consider if the data is available, and depending on
the specific data source, this will include information on the type of data, its location, and
possibly specify tools to be used to collect it. Different types of data sources provide
varying types of information. Secondary data sources are available from previous studies,
reports, or databases. This may include information from qualitative and quantitative data
sources.

The tools or methods used depend on the type of data and sources. Primary
sources collect data using surveys, interviews, and observation. Secondary data uses
TYPE STUDENT LAST NAME TYPE SHORTENED TITLE PAGE 8

software and online search tools for data collection. Although data collection methods are
generally more complex and time-consuming in the evaluation context, this is not always
the case. The key determinant is what is required and what is reasonable and feasible for
the program to collect.” In some situations, data collection for evaluation might be
simpler or less time-consuming, especially in programs with clear, readily available data
from secondary sources. Also, in the case of primary monitoring data, consideration will
need to be given to database design, data storage, data management, and subsequent data
analysis. These elements are critical to ensure that data is effectively captured, stored, and
analyzed in a way that supports the program’s monitoring and evaluation objectives.

Indicators show the evaluator what is being monitored and indicate progress in a
specific area of the program. It measures different aspects of the program, categorized
into inputs, outputs, outcomes, and impact. Each indicator should be specific,
measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. Targets specify the desired level of
achievement for each indicator. Some key considerations of indicators are starting with a
baseline measurement to set realistic targets, engaging stakeholders to ensure targets are
relevant and attainable, and defining the period within which the targets should be
achieved. Baseline study provides an analysis using either primary or secondary data, of
the situation that existed before the intervention, against which future progress can be
assessed, or comparisons can be made.” Analysis can be provided using either primary or
secondary data. The method of baseline studies depends on resource availability, time
constraints, and data needs

10) CONCLUSION
This guide has strengthened my understanding of monitoring and evaluation as a
structured, iterative process grounded in action research. It builds on concepts from the
MME 450 course and reinforces them through practical case study examples. By
applying the step-by-step framework and grounding M&E efforts in clear guiding
principles, I am better equipped to integrate these practices into my professional work
and ongoing engagement with program and project staff.

REFERENCES
Hobson, Kersty, Ruth Mayne and Jo Hamilton. A Step-by-Step Guide to Monitoring and
Evaluation. Oxford; Oxford University Press, 2013.