Reading Booklet - Self-Acceptance Vs Self-Depreciation 2
Reading Booklet - Self-Acceptance Vs Self-Depreciation 2
When you fail to achieve something that is important for you to achieve
and you put yourself down for your failure, you tend to equate your failure
in this area with your failure as a person. As I will discuss more fully in the
next chapter, this is an example of you defining yourself according to your
behaviour. If you fail you think that this means that you are a failure as a
person. Once you have defined yourself as a failure, you then tend to give
up pursuing your valued goal because you think that it is not worth you
exerting further effort since, as you see it, there is very little or no chance
of success. In addition, once you regard yourself as a failure then you tend
to access memories of past failures and find it increasingly difficult to
think of times when you have been successful. Even when you can
remember times when you have been successful, your view of yourself as
a failure affects how you think of these successes. Thus, you tend to
attribute these successes to luck rather than to your own abilities.
When you break one of your ethical or moral codes and you condemn
yourself for doing so, you tend to view yourself as a bad or rotten person
for doing so. If what you did was bad then in your mind you are a bad
person. In thinking this way about yourself, you tend to want to hurt or
punish yourself in some way. This may take the form of a passive
punishment where you refrain from doing anything to enjoy yourself, or it
may involve you actively punishing yourself where you destroy something
that you value.
You may even experience a strong desire to hurt yourself physically. If
this is the case, especially if you act on these destructive impulses, then I
suggest that you seek appropriate professional help for you need more
assistance than I can offer you in this book. If transgressing your ethical or
moral code has involved you hurting others, then when you condemn
yourself for your actions you will either beg others for forgiveness or do
far too much in the way of offering reparation. Even when you go "over
the top' in your efforts to make up to the other person for having hurt or
harmed them, feeling that you are a rotten person for breaking your code,
you think deep down that you are beyond forgiveness, such is the nature
of your badness as a person. Thus, you are suspicious of the other's
forgiveness and think that you do not deserve any understanding that
they may show you. If you are religious, when you think that you are bad
for breaking your code then you consider that God will not forgive you and
that you will go to hell when you die.
Being criticized
When you are criticized and you put yourself down in the face of this
criticism, you again tend to overgeneralize in one or more ways. For
example, if someone criticizes you for being mean with money, there are
a number of possibilities:
1. The person is criticizing you for being mean with money: this is a
fair criticism, but she does not depreciate you for this.
2. The person is criticizing you for being mean with money: this is a
fair criticism, and she does depreciate you for this.
3. The person is criticizing you for being mean with money: this is an
unfair criticism, but she does not depreciate you for this.
4. The person is criticizing you for being mean with money: this is an
unfair criticism, and she does depreciate you for this.
You can depreciate yourself in all these circumstances, but when you do
put yourself down in the face of criticism, you are likely to think that the
conditions outlined in the second scenario hold. In other words, you tend
to think that the person's criticism is fair when it may be unfair and that
the person is depreciating you when this may not be the case.
When you are particularly prone to depreciating yourself in the face of
criticism you anticipate being criticized in the absence of available
evidence that this might be the case. In addition, you may develop a
defensive attitude and immediately deny any criticism that you may
receive without considering whether the criticism has any merit.
Behaviourally, when you are prone to depreciating yourself in the face of
criticism, you may tend to avoid people who you consider are likely to
criticize you or you may criticize others before they criticize you. You may
also play safe and avoid taking risks that may lead to you being criticized.
Thus, fear of criticism tends to promote conformity and inhibits creative
and innovative thinking which if expressed to others may attract criticism.
If you depreciate yourself when you think that another person either does
not accept you, does not like you or does not love you, then you tend to
think of yourself as unacceptable, unlikeable or unlovable. If you are
particularly prone to self-depreciation in the face of these conditions then
you tend to infer that another does not accept you, for example, in the
absence of evidence that this is the case. Or if another person does show
that they dislike you and you put yourself down, then you overestimate
the number of other people who may also dislike you.
When you put yourself down for being disliked, for example, since you
also believe that you need to be liked you will go out of your way to be
liked by the person who dislikes you. Thus, you may sacrifice your own
interests in order to get back into the good books of the person who
dislikes you, which you probably wouldn't do if you did not depreciate
yourself about being disliked. If you are particularly prone to depreciating
yourself for not being accepted, liked or loved, then you will do all you can
to be accepted before there is any hint of a threat that the other person
may dislike you.
Thus, you may attempt to ingratiate yourself with others you have just
met, a tactic which sometimes backfires because some people will dislike
you for your ingratiating behaviour whereas they would have liked you if
you were more genuine with them.
When you depreciate yourself for having some kind of defect or handicap,
you again begin by rating the defect or handicap negatively and then
overgeneralize by rating yourself negatively. You can put yourself down
for a range of defects or handicaps, examples being obesity, stammering
and dyslexia.
When you depreciate yourself for having a defect or a handicap, you are
doing two things. First, you are labelling something about you as a defect
or a handicap, and second, you depreciate yourself for having the defect
or disability. Not everybody regards being obese as a defect, for example,
and even among those who do, not everyone depreciates themselves for
having this condition.
The role of others is important here, but it is complex. I would say that the
more others regard something about you as a defect or a handicap, the
more likely it is that you will regard this aspect in the same way and the
more likely it is that you will depreciate yourself. However, this is not
always the case, as is demonstrated in a condition known as Body
Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD). In BDD (which is often referred to as
perceived ugliness syndrome in the media), the person thinks that some
aspect of her appearance is very ugly and she depreciates herself for
being defective in this way. The point, however, is that other people do
not think that the person has a defect. This makes little or no difference to
the person with BDD, who will not accept evidence that this is the case.
The important point is not what others actually think, but what the person
thinks about herself, which she then projects on to others.
Not all psychological problems can be traced to low self-esteem (or what I
refer to in this booklet as self-depreciation), but a lot can.
However, problems with self-depreciation come in many different guises
and next we will consider the different facets of this debilitating attitude
towards yourself.
Anxiety
When you are anxious you consider that you are facing some kind of
threat. There are, in fact, to types of anxiety: discomfort anxiety and ego
anxiety.
In ego anxiety, it the threat materializes then you will depreciate yourself
in some way. Typical ego-based threats concern the prospect of doing
poorly at a task (in which case you will consider yourself to be a failure or
incompetent), the prospect of being criticized (in which case you in
consider yourself worthless) or the prospect of being disapproved (in
which case you would consider yourself an unlikable person)
For example, Jamie was anxious about speaking in public and tried to
avoid doing so whenever possible. On the occasions when he had to speak
in public he was anxious in case he said something foolish in which case
he would regard himself as a fool.
Depression
When you feel depressed you consider that you have lost something very
important to you or that you have failed at an important task. Typical self-
depreciations in depression are: 'I am a failure', 'I am useless' and 'I am
unlovable'.
Guilt
You tend to feel guilty about doing something wrong, not doing the right
thing or hurting someone's feelings. The most common self-depreciation
in guilt is: 'I am a bad person'.
For example, Bill, a single man of 40 who had lived with his parents all his
life, became very guilty when he left home because he regarded himself a
rotten person for hurting their feelings.
Shame
You tend to feel ashamed when you fall very short of some ideal or when
you have revealed an inadequacy or defect in public. In particular, you
think that others who witness your behaviour will look down on you,
ignore you or turn away from you in disgust. Typical self-depreciations in
shame include: 'I am insignificant', 'I am defective' or 'I am repulsive'.
For example, Josie considered that she was ugly and wore make-up to
hide the wrinkles underneath her eyes. If other people saw her wrinkles
she predicted that they would feel disgusted and she would consider
herself to be a repulsive person as a result.
Unhealthy jealousy
Harriet felt unhealthily jealous whenever she saw her boyfriend, Michael,
talking to an attractive woman, because she inferred that Michael was
interested in having a relationship with the other woman which would
mean that she, Harriet, was worthless.
Hurt
When you experience feelings of hurt you consider that you have been
treated in a way that you do not deserve by a significant other who you do
not expect to treat you in this manner (e.g. that the other person has
betrayed your trust). Typical self-depreciations in hurt include: 'I am
unlovable', 1 am of no account as a person', 'I am insignificant'.
Donald experienced hurt when his best friend forgot to send him a
birthday card, taking this as evidence that his best friend did not care for
him as much as he cared for his friend. If this was true, Donald reasoned
that it would prove that he was of less importance as a person, not only to
his friend, but to himself.
Unhealthy envy
When you experience unhealthy feelings of envy, you focus on the fact
that someone possesses something, such as a desired characteristic or
object, that you do not have, and you hold the belief that this proves that
you are less worthy than the other person.
Unhealthy anger
For example, Barry made himself unhealthily angry at his wife when she
criticized him for being thoughtless. Deep down, Barry agreed with the
criticism, but because he thought that this proved that he was worthless
he got angry at his wife for making him feel this way. I should point out
that this complicated psychological process normally occurs
extraordinarily quickly outside the awareness of the person who is angry.
When you depreciate yourself, you can put yourself down in various ways.
'I am repulsive' - here you consider that you are hideous to yourself and
others and this often relates to an important aspect of your appearance.
This form of self-judgment is again most often found in shame.
'I am stupid' - here you tend to judge yourself on the basis of your
Incompetence or self-defeating behaviour. This form of self-judgment is
most often found in unhealthy anger towards yourself.
"I am inferior' - here you judge yourself in relation to others and are found
wanting in that comparison. This form of self-judgment is most often
found in unhealthy envy, shame, anxiety and depression.
There are four ways: by inspecting your emotions; by identifying what you
really believe; by examining the way you act or 'feel like' acting; and by
considering the ways in which you subsequently think. Let me consider
each one in turn.
When you put yourself down this has a great bearing on the way you act
or 'feel like' acting (or what are known as action tendencies). Self-
depreciation tends to lead to actions that are self-defeating or potentially
self-defeating (in the case of action tendencies), whereas self-acceptance
tends to lead to actions that are constructive or potentially constructive
(in the case of action tendencies).
When you put yourself down the thinking that you subsequently engage in
is unrealistic and biased, whereas when you accept yourself your
subsequent thinking tends to be realistic and balanced.
The chances are that, if you are reading this booklet, you tend to put
yourself down either in specific situations or more generally. If the latter is
the case, you would probably say that you suffer from low self-esteem. It
may be that you are hoping that reading this booklet will help to raise
your self-esteem. If so, I am not going to help you to do this. No, your eyes
have not deceived you. I am not going to help you to raise or improve
your self-esteem. Why not? Because self-esteem is not a useful concept
and if you begin to like yourself more this has its problems. You are
probably confused about what I've just written, but trust me - all will
become clear presently. Let me begin my explanation about why
improving your self-esteem will not help you in the long term by defining
what we mean by self-esteem.
What is self-esteem?
In order for you to understand what self-esteem is, I first have to define
the terms 'self" and 'esteem'. Let's begin with the term 'self. What is the
self?
Let me see if I can help you to answer this question by asking you a
further set of questions.
In all probability you have answered 'yes' to all eight questions because
you realize that all these different aspects are either a part of you,
authored by you or experienced by you.
Paul Hauck has provided a very useful definition of the self. He says that
the self is 'every conceivable thing about you that can be rated'. All of the
aspects that I asked you about in the above eight questions can be rated
and thus form a part of your self.
So, what is not a part of your self? Well, your possessions are not part of
your self. You may object here and cite your most prized possession which
has great importance to you. However, I would say that it is your feelings
about this possession which are part of your self and not the possession
itself, which exists as an entity independent of you. It is the independent
existence of an object or person that makes it not a part of your self, no
matter how important that object or person is to you and no matter how
much you 'feel' they are a part of your self.
Self
The self is every conceivable thing about you that can be rated:
• behaviour
• thoughts
• personality characteristics
• feelings and emotions
• sensations
• images
• dreams
• bodily parts.
Now let's consider the term 'esteem'. It comes from the verb 'to estimate',
which means to judge, rate or evaluate. So, what does self-esteem mean?
It means rating the self.
Now here is the problem. Can you legitimately give your self a rating or
evaluation that can do full justice to it, given that, as we have already
seen, the self is exceedingly complex and constantly changing? The
answer is a resounding NO.
Thus, if you have low self-esteem you are consistently giving your
exceedingly complex and changing self a single, global. negative rating.
The remedy is not to give your exceedingly complex and changing self a
global positive rating, which is what you would have to do if you wanted
high self-esteem. So, if improving your self-esteem is not the alternative
to self-depreciation, what is? The answer is developing unconditional self-
acceptance.
I have already made the point that human beings are incredibly complex.
Thus, you are a complex mix of behaviours, thoughts, personality
characteristics, feelings and emotions, sensations, images, dreams and
bodily parts. How on earth are you going to arrive at a legitimate single
rating that completely accounts for you in all your complexity?
The answer is that you can't do this. Also, even if you could give yourself a
single rating, this would soon be out of date because as soon as you
assigned a rating to yourself, you would have moved on, acquiring more
experience and processing them in slightly new ways. In short, it is not
possible to assign a process like your self a rating, which is by definition a
fixed thing.
You can, however, rate parts of yourself and the events in your life and it
is important that you do so, otherwise you will not be motivated to change
negative aspects of your self and negative life events.
When you depreciate yourself you are operating under a very different
principle. This principle states that human beings can be given a single
global rating. Thus, when you believe that you are inadequate, you are
assigning to yourself a single, negative, global rating (i.e. inadequate)
which is unwarranted.
Can we say that as human beings we have an essence, a feature that all
humans share, that defines us? In my view our essence is twofold. First,
all humans are fallible. We all make mistakes.
As Dr Maxie C. Maultsby Jr has said, all humans have an incurable error-
making tendency.
To sum up: if you have an essence as a human it is that you are fallible
and unique
When you depreciate yourself, you are operating under a very different
principle, namely, human beings are perfectible. Thus, when you fail to
achieve your standards and depreciate yourself you tend to do so because
you believe that once you set goals for yourself, you must literally must,
achieve these goals.
If you cannot legitimately rate another person, then it follows that one
person is not worthier than another, for assigning worth to a person is a
form of rating a person. Rather, it makes more sense and is more accurate
to say that all humans are equal in being human but unequal in many
different respects. Thus, I may be better at practising psychology than
you, but you may be better at gardening than me. I may be more
persistent at doing tasks than you, but you may be more creative at these
tasks than me.
It follows from this that it is not realistic or helpful for you to compare your
self with the self of another person, but it is realistic and helpful for you to
compare your behaviour or any other rateable aspect with that of another
person. This aspect-based comparison can help you to learn from others
who are better than you at the aspect under consideration, whereas self-
based comparison can only lead you to feelings of superiority or, more
often, feelings of inferiority.
When you depreciate yourself, you do think that selves can be compared
and that human beings differ in worth. When you come off worse in such
comparisons, you render yourself very vulnerable to depression, anxiety
and other emotional disorders.
I want people to like me, but they don't have to. If people do not like me
it does not mean that I am unlikeable. It means that I am a fallible human
being with some likeable and unlikeable aspects whom some people will
like and others won't.
People must like me. If people do not like me, it proves that I am
unlikeable.
I'd like to be more attractive than I am, but it isn't essential that I be so. I
am not worthless for being unattractive. I am acceptable because I am
alive, unique and human.
However, when you accept yourself in the face of the same negative
activating event you tend to experience one or more healthy negative
emotions such as concern, sadness, remorse, regret, disappointment,
healthy anger, healthy jealousy and healthy envy.
For clarity, I will first consider the unhealthy emotion and its self-
depreciating belief before presenting its healthy alternative based on self-
acceptance.
Anxiety: 'If I fail at my upcoming test which I must not do, I will
be a failure.'
Concern: 'I would rather not fail at my upcoming test, but there is
no law of the universe to prevent me from doing so. If I
do fail, I will not be a failure. Rather I will be a fallible
human being who has failed.'
Depression: Since my partner rejected me, as she absolutely should
not have done, this means that I am no good.'
Healthy anger: ‘I would rather you hadn't criticized me, but there's no
reason why you absolutely should not have done so.
Your criticism reminds me that I am fallible and not a
failure.'
Unhealthy envy: 'My friend is making more money at his job than I am. I
must have what he has and because I don't this makes
me less worthy than I would be if I had what he has.'
Healthy envy: 'My friend is making more money at his job than I am. I
would prefer it if I was making as much as him, but I do
not have to do so. I am not less worthy than I would be if
I earned as much as my friend. Rather, I am the same
fallible, unrateable human whether I have what he has
or not.'
In addition, if you hold a self-acceptance belief you are more likely to act
in constructive ways, whereas when you hold a corresponding self-
depreciation belief you tend to act in self-defeating ways.
For example, if you believe you are a failure for doing poorly at a task at
work, you will tend to stop working at the task and turn away from
searching for ways in which you can learn from your errors. You will be
hesitant in doing similar tasks in the future, avoiding them whenever you
can.
However, if you accept yourself as an ordinary human with your successes
and failures rather than as a failure, you are more likely to keep working
at the task and Willi actively search for ways of learning from your
mistakes. You will be somewhat wary of attempting similar tasks, but you
will still do so.
The alternative, then, to rating the self is to acknowledge that you are
human, alive, fallible and unique whatever you do, and to accept yourself
for being so. However, you may be among those who still want to rate
themselves.
Of course, you can't prove that you are worthwhile in the same way that
you can prove that you are alive, human, fallible, unique and constantly
changing, so you are making a leap of faith. Someone could come up with
the equally valid view that you are worthless because you are alive,
human, fallible, unique and constantly changing. But if you are going to
rate yourself this is probably the safest way of doing so.
There are other ways of rating yourself that are conditional which do not
have to lead to emotional disturbance. Thus, if you believe that you are
worthwhile because Jesus loves you or that you have a fairy godmother
looking after you, as long as you believe this you will be fine. But the
trouble is that one day you may think that Jesus hates you or you may
stop believing in the existence of fairy godmothers, and then you will
become vulnerable to emotional disturbance (e.g. I am worthless because
Jesus hates me).
I hope you can see from the foregoing that rather than encouraging
resignation, unconditional self-acceptance promotes constructive change.
9. You can learn to accept yourself unconditionally (but never
perfectly, nor for all time)
The best that you can hope for is to work towards ever greater self-
acceptance and accept the grim reality that, even if you rigorously
practise the principles and techniques that I outline in this booklet, you
will, at times, still depreciate yourself. This is a realistic position, and only
those of you who are looking for perfect self-acceptance are likely to be
discouraged by
Why not take a copy of it and read it several times a day to remind
yourself what unconditional self-acceptance means?