0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views3 pages

Mechanics For Debate

mechanics

Uploaded by

mareystill35
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views3 pages

Mechanics For Debate

mechanics

Uploaded by

mareystill35
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

MECHANICS AND CRITERIA FOR DEBATE

1. Format:
a. Teams: Two teams, each consisting of two or three members - one or two main speakers and, a reserve.
b. Rounds: Three preliminary rounds and a final round.
c. Speech Duration: 8 minutes for the first speaker, 8 minutes for the second speaker, and 4 minutes for
the third speaker .

2. Topics:
Elimination Topics:
First Round
1.
2.
3.

Second Round
4.
5.
6.
7.

Final :

Note: Preparation Time: Participants are allowed to prepare their arguments.

3. Speaker Roles:
a. First Affirmative: Presents the opening arguments supporting the resolution.
b. First Negative: Challenges the opening arguments and introduces counterarguments.
c. Second Affirmative: Further develops the case for the resolution and responds to opposition points.
d. Second Negative: Further develops the opposition's case and counters affirmative arguments.
e. Rebuttal Speakers :Summarize and reinforce the main points of their team's case.

5. Cross-Examination:
a. Rules: One minute protected at the beginning and end of each speech for cross-examination.
b. Purpose: To challenge and clarify opponents' arguments.

6. Rebuttal:
a. Rules: 4 minutes for each team for rebuttals.
b. Purpose: Direct response to opponents' arguments, strengthening their own position.

7. Adjudication Panel:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
8. Timekeeping:
a. Timekeeper:
b. Penalties: Deduction of 5 points for exceeding time limits.

10. Feedback Session:


a. Post-Debate: Judges provide constructive feedback to each team.
b. Criteria Emphasis: Highlight areas of strength and improvement.

Criteria for Judging:


1. Content (40 points):
a. Clarity of Argument (15 points): How clearly the team presented and supported its case.
b. Depth of Analysis (15 points): The thoroughness of research and analysis of the topic.
c. Relevance to the Resolution (10 points): The direct connection of arguments to the resolution.

2. Style (30 points):


a. Clarity of Expression (10 points): How well the team articulated its points.
b. Tone and Diction (10 points): The appropriateness of language and tone.
c. Engagement (10 points): Interaction with the audience and effective communication.

3. Strategy (30 points):


a. Response to Opposition (10 points): Effectiveness in countering opponents' arguments.
b. Adaptation of Arguments (10 points): Ability to adjust and strengthen their case.
c. Time Management (10 points): Efficient use of time during speeches and cross-examinations.

Coordinators:
Lea Erica Labial Bendijo
Olivelyn Potane Flores

You might also like