Article
Article
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02528-7 OPEN
1 College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China. 2 Sunway Business School, Sunway University, Sunway, Selangor,
Malaysia. 3 School of Business, Law and Entrepreneurship, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia. 4 Faculty of Business, Design and
Arts, Swinburne University of Technology, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. 5 Department of Chemistry, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
6 College of Environment and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, 100124 Beijing, People’s Republic of China. ✉email: [email protected]
C
Introduction
ryptocurrency has heralded a transformative shift in the insights into shaping future economic policies, strategies, and
global financial sector, offering a reimagined concept of infrastructures. Awareness speaks to the extent of knowledge and
money (Johar et al., 2021; Kakinaka and Umeno, 2022). understanding individuals have about cryptocurrency; acceptance
Underpinned by blockchain and cryptography, cryptocurrency gauges their openness to adopting it as a part of their financial
represents a novel class of digital or virtual currency. At its core, a behaviors; and adoption reflects the incorporation of crypto-
blockchain serves as a decentralized ledger, chronicling every currency into their monetary transactions. Moreover, the role of
transaction across a distributed network of computers, assuring trust as a moderator is especially crucial. Trust, or the lack
both transparency and permanence, whereas cryptography thereof, can significantly influence an individual’s decision-
ensures that transactions are safeguarded against tampering and making process concerning cryptocurrency. In an environment
that participants’ identities remain confidential (Kumar et al., where transactions are decentralized and often lack traditional
2023; Sahoo et al., 2022). Popular examples of cryptocurrencies oversight, trust can be the linchpin that determines whether an
include Bitcoin and Ethereum. Unlike traditional currencies like individual engages with or shies away from cryptocurrency. By
the dollar or euro issued by central banks, cryptocurrencies examining the moderating role of trust, we can better understand
function outside established financial systems. They are not tied the psychological factors that play a pivotal role in crypto-
to tangible assets like gold or governed by central financial currency’s broader acceptance and usage in society.
institutions. Instead, they are created through a computational Given the above, the goal of this study is to examine the
process called mining, which involves using computational power relationships between cryptocurrency awareness, acceptance, and
to solve complex mathematical problems, leading to the creation adoption, as well as the moderating role of trust in these rela-
and verification of new transactions on a cryptocurrency network. tionships. To do so, this study adopts the technology acceptance
While digital forms of money like Apple Pay or PayPal credits model (TAM) as a theoretical lens, wherein the technology in
exist in the digital or online realm, they operate within the con- point is cryptocurrency. Essentially, TAM assumes that the
fines of traditional banking systems and lack the decentralized acceptance of a technology could be understood by its ease of use
essence of blockchain (Jalan et al., 2023). On the other hand, and usefulness, which in turn shapes the adoption of that tech-
cryptocurrencies, thanks to their inherent decentralized, trans- nology (Davis, 1989). Extending this theory, this study introduces
parent, and immutable nature, stand distinct and have ignited (i) the concept of awareness, which is posited to exert a positive
profound discussions in modern financial and technological influence on consumers’ perception of the ease of use and use-
arenas. fulness of the technology on the basis that consumers are in a
As per recent estimates, the aggregate value of transactions in better position to form an opinion about a technology when they
digital payments is projected to reach US$9.46 trillion in 2023, are knowledgeable about that technology, and (ii) the notion of
with an expected annual increase of more than 11.8%, resulting in trust, which is proposed to strengthen the relationship between
a total projection of US$14.78 trillion by 2027 (Siska, 2023). As awareness, acceptance, and adoption on the basis that trust acts as
the internet’s ubiquity grew, so did the shift from conventional an enabler, mitigating potential fears and uncertainties associated
cash payments to online transaction methods, reshaping global with the adoption of new technologies, particularly in financial
monetary systems (Sukumaran et al., 2022). Digital advancements transactions where credibility and security and are paramount.
and technological accessibility have also spurred an uptick in This study contributes to both theory and practice in several
consumers engaging in online transactions via cryptocurrency significant ways. Theoretically, by adopting and extending TAM
(Kumar et al., 2021; Shin and Rice, 2022). For many, the allure of to the realm of cryptocurrency, we strive to not only affirm the
cryptocurrency lies in its borderless nature, simplicity, and speed theoretical generalizability of the theory but also illuminate how
(Galariotis and Karagiannis, 2020; Zafar et al., 2021). Indeed, awareness and trust play pivotal roles in the acceptance and
cryptocurrency has reshaped the global financial infrastructure, adoption of such innovative financial technologies, which
compelling institutions to innovate in the digital transaction answered the call by past scholars such as (Farrukh et al., 2023;
space (Khan et al., 2020). This momentum has spurred monetary Kumar et al., 2021). By integrating the concept of awareness into
systems to evolve, adapting and instituting policies that align with TAM, this study posits that a heightened level of understanding
technological progress (Hasan et al., 2022). can bolster consumers’ perceptions regarding the ease of use and
A comprehensive understanding of cryptocurrencies is crucial usefulness of cryptocurrencies. In doing so, this research will
in the current digital age (Uematsu and Tanaka, 2019). The enrich TAM by accounting for the influence of awareness in the
growing popularity of cryptocurrencies is evident, especially as adoption of emerging technologies. Furthermore, the introduc-
they herald transformative changes in global money markets tion of trust as a moderating variable elucidates how confidence
(Tandon et al., 2021). Yet, adoption is tempered by challenges. can amplify or mitigate the relationships between awareness,
While technology awareness can enhance acceptance, issues like acceptance, and adoption of cryptocurrency. This presents a
limited technological know-how and understanding of online nuanced understanding of the psychological facets that underpin
trading, legislative constraints, and security concerns act as the decision-making processes surrounding technology adoption
deterrents (Albayati et al., 2020; Li et al., 2023; Rejeb et al., 2023). in financial contexts. The use of TAM as a foundational theore-
Moreover, while studies suggest that cryptocurrencies could tical lens and the inclusion of new variables like awareness and
promote financial inclusivity for underrepresented demographics, trust into the model is in line with the recommendation of Lim
concerns remain about unequal wealth distribution among (2018) for contributions amounting to theoretical generalizability
cryptocurrency holders (Abdul-Rahim et al., 2022; Allen et al., and extension in relation to the theory. Practically, the findings of
2022). Recognizing the intricacies of cryptocurrency is crucial in this study can guide policymakers, financial institutions, and tech
today’s digital age, ensuring individuals stay abreast of techno- developers in recognizing the crucial factors that drive or inhibit
logical advances (Yayla et al., 2023). the mass adoption of cryptocurrency. By discerning the impor-
The present study argues that understanding cryptocurrency tance of awareness and trust, stakeholders can develop targeted
awareness, acceptance, and adoption is imperative in today’s educational campaigns and security measures, respectively, to
evolving digital financial landscape. As cryptocurrency positions bolster the public’s confidence and understanding of crypto-
itself at the forefront of financial innovation, comprehending the currencies. In essence, this research offers strategic insights to
factors that drive or deter its acceptance can offer valuable industries and governments, enabling them to tailor their
initiatives in promoting a more inclusive, transparent, and potential hedge against inflation. This contrasts with traditional
trustworthy digital financial landscape. fiat currencies, which can be influenced by central bank policies
(Allen et al., 2022). With more individuals adopting crypto-
currency, there is potential for a shift in the demand for tradi-
Theoretical background: technology acceptance
tional banking services, subsequently influencing interest rates
model (TAM)
and banks’ profitability (Tandon et al., 2021). Put simply, cryp-
TAM is pivotal in predicting and explaining technology adoption
tocurrency represents a digital equivalent of cash that promises
behaviors. At its core, TAM posits two central constructs that
quicker, more reliable, and cost-effective transactions than its
determine one’s intention to accept and adopt a new technology:
government-issued counterparts (Entrialgo, 2017). Its popularity
perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU)
has surged in recent years, as evidenced by its prominence in
(Davis, 1989). PEOU refers to the degree to which one believes
trading indices (Kher et al., 2021). Hence, this study zeroes in on
that using a particular technology would be free from effort
the individual intention to adopt cryptocurrency.
(Sagheer et al., 2022). Essentially, the simpler and more
Yet, the path to widespread adoption of cryptocurrency is not
straightforward a technology is perceived, the more likely it is to
without hurdles. Among the challenges, environmental concerns
be adopted. This is founded on the principle that individuals are
related to the energy-intensive mining processes of certain
naturally inclined to choose technologies that do not require
cryptocurrencies have sparked debates on their sustainability
significant effort or time (Siagian et al., 2022). Second, PU is
(Rejeb et al., 2023). With regulatory landscapes still maturing,
centered on one’s belief that utilizing a particular technology will
many investors approach this technology with caution due to
enhance their performance (Fagan et al., 2012). It captures the
potential risks (Shahzad et al., 2018). Common barriers include
value proposition of the technology: if people deem a technology
the nascent stage of cryptocurrency development, restricted
as beneficial and enhancing their productivity or efficiency, they
access to advanced technology, and marketplace challenges such
are more inclined to use it (Lu et al., 2022). Through PEOU and
as unstructured trading environments, undefined financial reg-
PU, one’s intention toward technology adoption is kindled
ulations, and heightened security risks (Aboalsamh et al., 2023).
(Davis, 1989).
Addressing these concerns, this study seeks to provide insights
TAM is a robust theoretical framework that aids consumers in
into the potential digital evolution awaiting individuals. The
making informed decisions regarding the embrace of technolo-
significance of cryptocurrencies as a potential mainstay in global
gical advancements (Lim, 2018). Our study underscores the
finance is undeniable (Granić and Marangunić, 2019).
relevance of TAM’s acceptance elements, specifically PEOU and
Leading financial markets, including the U.S., are actively
PU, in gauging consumers’ intention towards adopting crypto-
researching and considering integrating cryptocurrency into their
currency. Evidently, past scholars have consistently utilized TAM
financial ecosystems (Hasgül et al., 2023). The horizon seems
as a cornerstone theory in assessing individual behavior con-
promising, with evolving technological solutions aiming to
cerning the uptake of novel technologies (Kumar et al., 2021;
address current challenges and projections hinting at an even
Sagheer et al., 2022; Shahzad et al., 2018; Yuen et al., 2021).
more integrated role of cryptocurrencies in global finance.
In the ever-evolving landscape of cryptocurrency, there
Taking Pakistan as a case study, its largely cash-driven econ-
remains a noticeable dearth of scholarly attention on its utiliza-
omy juxtaposes with its youthful population and growing internet
tion as a medium of exchange (Khan et al., 2020). Addressing this
accessibility—factors ripe for digital payment adoption. In this
gap, our study endeavors to craft a theoretical framework, firmly
regard, cryptocurrency’s potential as a trusted financial instru-
anchored in TAM, to shed light on the determinants of crypto-
ment in developing countries like Pakistan is substantial. His-
currency adoption. It is imperative to acknowledge that intentions
torical data indicates a rising preference for virtual currencies
stand as potent precursors of actions, with these intentions being
over traditional payment methods in regions like this (Arpaci
invariably shaped by an individual’s attitudes and perceptions
et al., 2023). In an exemplary move, El Salvador passed the Bit-
toward a specific endeavor (Davis, 1989; Lim, 2018).
coin law in June 2021, granting it legal tender status alongside the
U.S. dollar. This step, intended to streamline daily transactions
Conceptual background: cryptocurrency and reduce remittance costs, has been met with diverse reactions
Cryptocurrency, fundamentally a digital or virtual form of cur- globally (Gaikwad and Mavale, 2021). Its long-term impact,
rency utilizing cryptography for security, made its debut in 2008 especially in the domain of remittances, remains under scrutiny
through a white paper published by an individual or group under (Howson and de Vries, 2022).
the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto; this innovation was later
introduced in 2009 (Tauni et al., 2015). These digital assets offer
decentralized control as opposed to centralized banking systems, Hypotheses development
promoting financial autonomy and inclusivity. Cryptocurrency awareness and adoption. Awareness plays a
As a testament to its transformative potential, recent research pivotal role in the acceptance and adoption of new technologies.
highlights its increasing influence in various sectors of life, from Tracing back to diffusion innovation theory, awareness is con-
remittances to cross-border trade (Parate et al., 2023). Given its sidered the initial phase, crucial for the success of subsequent
rising economic significance, numerous countries are gradually adoption stages (Lu et al., 2022). Building on this foundational
recognizing and shifting towards cryptocurrency. With its understanding, studies examining technology implementation
decentralized nature, individuals find appeal in the autonomy, have reaffirmed the positive association between awareness levels
privacy, and potential returns it promises, away from traditional and attitudes toward novel technologies (Arpaci et al., 2023).
banking systems (Bibi, 2023). An individual’s awareness encapsulates their comprehension of
Cryptocurrency can be broken down into two components: its advantages, potential drawbacks, and practical methods for its
‘crypto’ and ‘currency’. While ‘crypto’ refers to cryptography that utilization (Zou et al., 2023). Consequently, the depth of a
secures user information and transactions, ‘currency’ is simply a person’s awareness often sways their perceptions and, more
medium of exchange. Globally, cryptocurrency has initiated sig- critically, their readiness to adopt. A compelling parallel can be
nificant changes in the financial sector, especially in developing found in behavioral intention, a metric that gauges the likelihood
countries. Noteworthily, a distinct characteristic of certain cryp- of users engaging in a specific action. This metric plays a decisive
tocurrencies is their limited supply, which, for some, offers a role in both the determination to integrate cryptocurrency into
one’s financial portfolio (Li, 2023). Historically, a robust The mediating role of cryptocurrency usefulness. Usefulness
behavioral intention has been a harbinger of successful reflects the consumers’ belief that embracing a novel technology
technology adoption, diminishing the risk of committing to will enhance their performance (Davis, 1989; Lim, 2018). Prior
unsuitable or inferior innovations (Mizanur and Sloan, 2017; research underscores that consumers are more likely to embrace
Siagian et al., 2022). cryptocurrency if they deem it beneficial (Kim et al., 2021).
Recent empirical evidence corroborates this relationship Historically, usefulness has been a cornerstone determinant of
between awareness and adoption. For instance, (Kakinaka and TAM, underscoring its centrality in assessing technological
Umeno, 2022) highlighted that heightened awareness invariably innovations (Fagan et al., 2012; Salas, 2020). Its role in infor-
bolstered positive intentions toward technology adoption. This mation systems, such as facilitating the ease of adoption of
intrinsic connection between cognitive awareness and behavioral cryptocurrency, is indeed substantial (Albayati et al., 2020).
outcomes serves as a cornerstone of our investigation. Intrigu- As digital platforms burgeon, consumers increasingly derive
ingly, the association between self-conceptualized technology their understanding of a technology’s usefulness from these
awareness and behavior is not merely anecdotal but is under- platforms. This sentiment aligns with our study’s emphasis:
pinned by empirical studies. For example, (Gupta and Arora, online platforms serve as a conduit through which people gauge
2020) underscored how nuanced technology awareness could the usefulness of cryptocurrency. The decision to engage with or
shape individuals’ propensity to assimilate cryptocurrency into refrain from technology often hinges on its utility (Theiri et al.,
their financial activities. 2022). Past research has ventured into examining the role of
Given the increasing emphasis on behavioral intention as a usefulness in influencing behavioral intentions, but the findings
reliable predictor of technology adoption (Nadeem et al., 2021) have been mixed, prompting further inquiry (Basuki et al., 2022).
our research delves into the interplay between technology For instance, consumers frequently endorse applications that are
awareness and the predisposition toward digital assets like skillful, user-friendly, and competent, as these qualities often
cryptocurrency. In light of the aforementioned discussion and correlate with the usefulness of the tool (Granić and Marangunić,
supporting evidence, we propose the following hypothesis: 2019). Yet, factors such as changing regulatory landscapes or
H1. Cryptocurrency awareness exerts a positive influence on environmental uncertainties can modulate consumers’ percep-
cryptocurrency adoption. tions of a technology’s usefulness (Stocklmayer and Gilbert,
2002). Some prior studies, interestingly, have highlighted that
consumers’ inclinations were swayed more by entertainment
The mediating role of cryptocurrency ease of use. Ease of use values than sheer usefulness, illuminating the multifaceted nature
stands as a pivotal factor in determining the adoption of new of consumer engagement (Abdul-Rahim et al., 2022).
technologies (Lim, 2018). The more intuitive and straightforward Literature has consistently underscored the symbiotic relation-
a technology appears, the higher the likelihood of its widespread ship between awareness of technology and its perceived
acceptance (Sagheer et al., 2022). As a technology’s usability usefulness in shaping behavioral intentions. Notably, Namahoot
becomes evident, individuals are more inclined to integrate it into and Rattanawiboonsom (2022) contended that consumers found
their routine. This notion is central to TAM, which has been electronic payments, including those using cryptocurrency,
widely acknowledged in the tech domain (Sudzina et al., 2023). useful. This assertion is buttressed by other studies that
The emphasis on ease of use stems from a need to create emphasize the direct impact of technological awareness on
technologies that are accessible, responsive, and adaptable. When behavioral intention through the prism of usefulness (Almajali
people find a technology to match these criteria, they are more et al., 2022; Sagheer et al., 2022). Noteworthily, a survey by Chen
inclined to adopt that technology. It is about meeting the needs of and Aklikokou (2020) illuminated the mediating role of
consumers without inundating them with unnecessary complex- usefulness in amplifying adoption behavior. Delving deeper into
ity (Nadeem et al., 2021). While over-simplification might this interplay Schaupp and Festa (2018) pondered the ease with
occasionally deter usage, efficient tools that streamline processes which newcomers could adopt cryptocurrency, positing that
generally receive consumers’ approval (Wibasuri, 2022). those acquainted with digital currencies are naturally more
Historical evidence suggests a strong association between receptive, given the usefulness they derive from it. This is further
ease of use and behavioral intentions toward the adoption of validated by research in China (Shahzad et al., 2018), which
novel technologies. For instance, Albayati et al. (2020) and determined that usefulness was a positive determinant for
Treiblmaier and Sillaber (2021) explored this connection, cryptocurrency adoption. In light of the aforementioned insights
though only Shahzad et al. (2018) provided particularly and findings, our hypothesis is articulated as:
insightful findings. Current research builds on this foundation, H3. Cryptocurrency usefulness significantly mediates the
investigating the belief that user-friendliness and efficiency in relationship between cryptocurrency awareness and adoption.
cryptocurrencies can enhance user experience and, conse-
quently, adoption rates. Furthermore, this study aligns with
past research (Siagian et al., 2022), emphasizing the connection The moderating role of cryptocurrency trust. Trust in the
between technology awareness and the intention to adopt the context of innovative technologies refers to a consumer’s comfort,
technology. It recognizes the vital role of ease of use as a bridge confidence, and assurance in its utilization (Quan et al., 2023). It
between these elements. is a cornerstone of acceptance and adoption, determining whether
To this end, numerous studies have already highlighted the individuals feel secure in embracing new innovations (Akther and
profound impact of ease of use on shaping intentions towards Nur, 2022). Over time, the evolution of social relationships has
new technological integrations (Biswas et al., 2021; Chen and underscored the importance of consistent trust when adopting
Aklikokou, 2020). With this context in mind, our research new technologies (Matemba and Li, 2018). Studies, such as those
specifically delves into how bolstering ease of use can pave the by Hasan et al. (2022), emphasized that heightened trust typically
way for broader cryptocurrency adoption. Based on the synthesis amplifies the adoption rate of technologies, especially those in
of the above discussions, we put forth: their nascent stages. By fostering trust in cryptocurrency, the
H2. Cryptocurrency ease of use significantly mediates the present study seeks to pave the way for its broader acceptance and
relationship between cryptocurrency awareness and adoption. adoption.
Cryptocurrency
positively, with the ease of use and usefulness of cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrency
trust acceptance mediating this relationship, and the trust in cryptocurrency
strengthening these mediating relationships.
H2 (+)
H4b (+)
H4a (+) Cryptocurrency
ease of use
Methods
Instrumentation. The study utilized a survey-based approach to
gauge respondents’ awareness, acceptance, and adoption of
Cryptocurrency H1 (+) cryptocurrency. Drawing from existing literature, a questionnaire
\
awareness
Cryptocurrency
adoption was designed, ensuring that it is tailored to fit the scope and focus
of this investigation (Shahzad et al., 2022). The items in the
questionnaire were measured using a five-point Likert scale, with
the following constructs:
Cryptocurrency
usefulness Cryptocurrency awareness. This construct deals with an indivi-
H3 (+)
dual’s understanding of cryptocurrency. For this study, it was
operationalized with eight items adopted from Sagheer et al.
Fig. 1 Conceptual framework. The cryptocurrency awareness, acceptance, (2022).
and adoption model.
Cryptocurrency ease of use. Addressing an individual’s perception
regarding the simplicity of embracing cryptocurrency, six items
In digital commerce, where intangibility is a given, trust is from Chen and Aklikokou (2020) were used.
paramount. Such trust encourages users to engage safely,
reducing uncertainties and reservations (Shin and Rice, 2022). Cryptocurrency usefulness. Signifying an individual’s belief in how
Mutual trust between users and providers is essential. Trust the adoption of cryptocurrency can augment their efficiency, this
solidifies user-provider relationships and ensures sustained was gauged through six items, with references from Albayati et al.
confidence in new ventures (Sukumaran et al., 2022). Essentially, (2020).
trustworthy entities reduce risks, propelling individuals to explore
and adopt. Research has shown that those with a positive Cryptocurrency trust. Critical to the acceptance process, trust
inclination towards digital technologies display a stronger affinity helps potential adopters believe in the credibility and reliability of
for acceptance, contingent upon factors like trust and associated cryptocurrency. Trust was evaluated through five items based on
security measures (Völter et al., 2021). This is corroborated by the work of Shahzad et al. (2018).
Utz et al. (2022) who posited that trust fortifies individuals’
intention to use blockchain, a technology in which cryptocur- Cryptocurrency adoption. Representing an individual’s projected
rency operates upon. likelihood of adopting cryptocurrency, this was defined through
Moreover, trust safeguards consumers’ financial and personal five items, also taken from Shahzad et al. (2018).
information, symbolizing a heightened level of confidence in
cryptocurrency adoption (Tan and Saraniemi, 2022). A significant
observation from past research is that when user trust wanes, their Sampling. While the emerging acceptance of cryptocurrency can
risk aversion decreases, and they become more susceptible to be witnessed across various age groups, this study specifically
pitfalls (Sukumaran et al., 2022). A pivotal point raised by targeted individuals aged 18 to 40 years in Lahore, Pakistan. The
researchers, such as McCloskey (2006), is that trust plays a choice of this sampling area, with its blend of institutions and
determinative role in influencing a user’s perception of how easy vibrant economic activities, ensured the representation of various
and useful a technology is. Trust, therefore, emerges as a linchpin sub-groups including university students, government/private
that shapes user behavior, especially concerning ease of use and employees, and business owners (Shahzad et al., 2021).
usefulness of technology (Albayati et al., 2020; Deebak et al., 2022). The data collection process initiated with screening questions,
In the midst of the prevailing discourse on technology determining the familiarity with digital tools and internet use, as
adoption, trust emerges as a crucial determinant. The current these were pre-requisites of actual or potential adoption of
study delves into the moderating role of trust, examining its cryptocurrency. This phase ensured that only the relevant
influence on the relationship between cryptocurrency awareness, participants, who met the established criteria, were considered.
acceptance (ease of use, usefulness), and adoption. Our study A total of 551 questionnaires were distributed both physically
seeks to clarify the nuances of this relationship, thereby enriching and online to individuals who passed the screening criteria and
understanding and advancing the field. Specifically, trust in voluntarily consented to participate in the cryptocurrency survey.
cryptocurrency is rooted in blockchain-based consensus proto- After accounting for missing values, outliers, and other
cols, such as proof of stake. This foundational trust enhances discrepancies, 332 responses were deemed suitable for further
people’s confidence to adopt cryptocurrency, with TAM pre- analysis, yielding a usable response rate of 60.2%. This number
dictors serving as key indicators of this trust chain. In light of aligns with Roscoe et al. (1975), who recommend a sample size
these considerations, the following hypotheses are proposed: ranging between 30 and 500 for empirical investigations. Among
H4a. Cryptocurrency trust significantly moderates the relation- these respondents, 100% were familiar with digital tools, and 39%
ship between cryptocurrency awareness, ease of use, and reported spending over seven hours daily on the internet,
adoption. indicating a tech-savvy sample. Participants were assured of the
H4b. Cryptocurrency trust significantly moderates the rela- confidentiality of their responses to ensure candidness in their
tionship between cryptocurrency awareness, ease of use, and answers.
adoption.
The conceptual framework, which depicts the hypothesized Results
relationships, is presented in Fig. 1. Essentially, cryptocurrency Profile of participants. The sample for the study comprised a
awareness is expected to shape cryptocurrency adoption diverse group of participants spanning various demographics.
Table 1 Profile of participants. constructs exceeded this threshold, signaling a high degree of
internal consistency. To supplement the insights gleaned from
Cronbach’s alpha and address its limitations, composite reliability
Demographics Frequency (n: 332) Percentage (100%)
was employed. This metric evaluates the internal consistency of
Gender the variables based on outer loading values (Martins et al., 2023).
Female 178 54% Akin to our findings for Cronbach’s alpha, the CR values for all
Male 154 46%
constructs, as depicted in Table 2, comfortably exceeded the 0.7
Age
18 to 30 years 235 71%
benchmark.
31 to 40 years 97 29% Convergent validity, which underscores the degree to which
Education items of a construct are positively correlated, was assessed using
Diploma 52 16% AVE. In line with the criteria proposed by Sarstedt et al. (2014),
Bachelor’s degree 150 45% AVE values above 0.5 denote satisfactory convergent validity. As
Master’s degree 115 35% evidenced in Table 2, all constructs not only met but often
Doctoral degree 8 2% exceeded this criterion, pointing to strong convergent validity.
Others (e.g., online 7 2% Discriminant validity measures the extent to which a construct
courses) is truly distinct from others in the model (Martins et al., 2023;
Occupation Shahzad, Xu, Khan, et al., 2023; Shahzad, Xu, Rehman, et al.,
Student 218 66% 2023). This distinctiveness ensures that the constructs do not
Government employee 25 8%
overlap, adding credence to the model’s unique explanations for
Private sector employee 44 13%
Business owner 45 13%
the observed phenomena (Martins et al., 2023). We employed the
Fornell-Larcker (1981) criterion for this purpose. Essentially, for
robust discriminant validity, the square root of the AVE for a
Table 1 presents a comprehensive profile of the participants based given construct should exceed its highest correlation with any
on gender, age, education, and occupation. other construct (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). Table 3 provides a
Among the 332 respondents, the gender distribution was fairly matrix depicting these values. The diagonal, representing the
balanced. Women represented a slight majority, accounting for square root of AVE values, is consistently larger than the off-
54% (n: 178) of the sample, while men constituted 46% (n: 154). diagonal values in their respective rows and columns, which are
The age distribution revealed that a significant majority of the the correlations between constructs.
participants were relatively young. Those in the age group of 18 to
30 years formed the largest chunk, representing 71% (n: 235) of
the total sample. Respondents aged between 31 to 40 years Structural model. The structural model’s examination offers
constituted 29% (n: 97). insights into the relationships between constructs and evaluates
Delving into educational qualifications, a significant portion of the hypothesized pathways (Farrukh et al., 2023). Using boot-
the participants held a bachelor’s degree, representing 45% (n: strapping in PLS-SEM, we deciphered the direct, mediating, and
150) of the sample. Those with a master’s degree formed 35% (n: moderating effects of the constructs concerning cryptocurrency
115) of the respondents. Participants with a diploma accounted adoption. Table 4 provides a summary of these findings.
for 16% (n: 52), and a very small fraction held a doctoral degree,
constituting 2% (n: 8) of the sample. Other educational Main effects. The hypothesis positing a relationship between
qualifications, which could include certifications from online cryptocurrency awareness and cryptocurrency adoption (H1)
courses, were held by 2% (n: 7) of the participants. displayed a β-value of 0.192, significant at the 0.05 level. This
In terms of the professional backgrounds of the participants, a means that as cryptocurrency awareness increases, there is a
predominant 66% (n: 218) were students, which aligns with the corresponding increase in the likelihood of cryptocurrency
age distribution. Business owners and private sector employees adoption. This supports the notion that more knowledgeable or
were equally represented at 13% each (n: 45 and n: 44, informed individuals about cryptocurrencies are more inclined to
respectively). Government employees made up a smaller portion adopt them. The fact that H1 is supported highlights the
of the sample at 8% (n: 25). importance of educating and raising awareness among potential
users to promote cryptocurrency adoption.
Other observations indicate that enhanced cryptocurrency
Measurement model. To establish the appropriateness and awareness bolsters the perception of its ease of use (β: 0.470,
accuracy of our measurement model, we employed the partial p < 0.01) and its overall usefulness (β: 0.288, p < 0.001), and that
least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) algorithm, the ease of use (β: 0.220, p < 0.01) and usefulness (β: 0.134,
a method extensively applied in related research. The assessment p < 0.05) of cryptocurrency are significant determinants of its
focused on three critical aspects: reliability, convergent validity, adoption. Noteworthily, a heightened trust in cryptocurrency
and discriminant validity, each of which contributes significantly significantly augments its ease of use (β: 0.224, p < 0.01) and
to the robustness of the model and its resultant interpretations usefulness (β: 0.220, p < 0.01). Additionally, the R2 values depict
(Farrukh et al., 2023). Table 2 delineates the main statistical the proportion of variance in the dependent variable predicted by
indices—i.e., Cronbach’s alpha (α), composite reliability (CR), the independent variable(s). The current model elucidates 51.5%
and average variance extracted (AVE)—associated with each of the variance in cryptocurrency ease of use, 14.8% in
construct of our measurement model. cryptocurrency usefulness, and 18.9% in cryptocurrency
For internal consistency, an evaluation criterion based on adoption.
Cronbach’s alpha was utilized. Introduced by Lee Cronbach in
1951, this metric determines how closely related a set of items are Mediation effects. The hypothesis suggesting that cryptocurrency
to each other within a construct (Sarstedt et al., 2014). A value awareness indirectly informs cryptocurrency adoption via its ease
closer to 1 indicates a higher consistency among the items, with of use (H2) is significant, with a β-value of 0.103 (p < 0.01). As
values above 0.7 being regarded as indicative of good internal such, H2 is supported. Similarly, the pathway from crypto-
reliability (Voorhees et al., 2016). As observed in Table 2, all currency awareness via its usefulness to its adoption (H3) is
7
ARTICLE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02528-7
(Shahzad et al.,
result, H3 is supported.
Noteworthily, mediating effects reveal the mechanism or
process through which an independent variable influences a
Source
2018)
that an increase in cryptocurrency awareness boosts the
perception of its ease of use, which subsequently amplifies the
rate of cryptocurrency adoption. This finding emphasizes the
importance of not only making potential users aware of
0.789
cryptocurrencies but also ensuring that they find the technology
AVE
to embrace them.
3.781
0.908
0.890
0.902
0.866
0.874
0.861
Discussion
convenience.
ripples throughout every industry, the finance sector has also seen
significant shifts. Cryptocurrency, a nascent financial instrument,
Item
and adoption.
Construct
adoption
Construct 1 2 3 4 5
1. Cryptocurrency adoption 0.888
2. Cryptocurrency ease of use 0.378 0.829
3. Cryptocurrency usefulness 0.244 0.233 0.853
4. Cryptocurrency awareness 0.379 0.662 0.307 0.844
5. Cryptocurrency trust 0.335 0.557 0.264 0.539 0.836
Note(s): The diagonal and bold values represent the square root of AVE.
with the intuitive idea that when people understand something, On cryptocurrency trust as a moderator. The discussion on
they are more likely to engage with it. This finding resonates with cryptocurrency adoption is incomplete without addressing cryp-
Gong et al. (2023) assertion that a person’s ability to recognize tocurrency trust. Trust emerges as a significant moderator,
and comprehend the efficacy of a technological innovation, in this bridging the gap between awareness and adoption. The research
case, cryptocurrency, is crucial for its acceptance in the market. aligns with Zafar et al. (2021) stance that trust can significantly
Essentially, the more informed an individual is about crypto- reduce the ambiguity and potential perceived risks associated
currency, the more likely they are to venture into its use without with adopting new technologies. In the world of digital transac-
apprehension. tions, where tangible cash does not exchange hands, crypto-
currency trust becomes a linchpin ensuring the smooth transition
On cryptocurrency, ease of use, and usefulness as mediators. from traditional to digital currencies.
The present study also illuminates the vital roles that crypto-
currency ease of use and usefulness play in the adoption process. Theoretical implications. The evolution of technology, especially
These factors essentially dictate the user’s experience and the in the realm of financial systems, necessitates a continuous
perceived tangible benefits of engaging with cryptocurrency. reassessment and refinement of existing theoretical and con-
On the one hand, cryptocurrency ease of use emphasizes the ceptual frameworks. Cryptocurrencies, with their transformative
importance of user-friendly experiences in technology adoption, a potential and inherent complexities, present an opportune con-
sentiment resonant with Chen and Aklikokou (2020) research. If text for examining the adaptability and relevance of established
potential users perceive a technology as complicated or theories. Against this backdrop, our exploration into the appli-
inaccessible, they are less likely to engage with it, even if they cation and extension of TAM for understanding cryptocurrency
are aware of its existence. adoption stands as a testimony to the model’s versatility and the
On the other hand, cryptocurrency’s usefulness underscores necessity for its evolution in line with contemporary technological
the tangible benefits users derive from the technology. This aligns challenges. Delving deeper into the findings, several pivotal the-
with Theiri et al. (2022) assertion that the perceived usefulness of oretical implications emerge, which are expounded upon below.
technological innovation can heavily impact one’s intent to
engage with it. For cryptocurrencies to become mainstream, Extending TAM to cryptocurrencies. Since its inception, TAM has
platforms need to clearly elucidate not just the ‘how-to’ but also served as a linchpin in understanding technology acceptance across
the ‘why’ of their technology. various domains (Lim, 2018). In expanding TAM’s purview to
include cryptocurrencies, this study embarks on uncharted theo- becomes increasingly intertwined with daily life, understanding the
retical territory. The implications of this extension are manifold. determinants that shape the adoption of emerging financial tech-
Firstly, it attests to the dynamism and versatility of TAM as a nologies such as cryptocurrencies is of paramount importance.
model, proving its applicability even in contexts as nascent and
volatile as cryptocurrency. Secondly, it allows for a structured Nurturing cryptocurrency awareness. Our study emphasizes the
analysis of an area that, despite its growing relevance, remains centrality of awareness in the adoption process. For policymakers
under-theorized. By providing a structured lens, the extended and institutions keen on promoting cryptocurrencies, it becomes
TAM offers a blueprint for future researchers to further investigate imperative to first ensure that the general populace has a foun-
and understand the nuances of cryptocurrency adoption. dational understanding of what these digital currencies entail.
This does not just mean superficial knowledge but a deeper
Incorporation of awareness in TAM. Awareness, as highlighted by comprehension of how cryptocurrencies work, their benefits,
this study, is not merely an ancillary factor but a core determinant potential risks, and the broader implications for the financial
in the adoption process, especially for emergent technologies like landscape. Financial institutions, educational institutions, and
cryptocurrency. While traditional TAM constructs acknowledge governments can collaborate to create awareness campaigns, host
the importance of prior experience (Shahzad et al., 2018), the workshops, or develop educational modules tailored to different
explicit introduction of awareness propels it to the forefront of demographic groups. Such initiatives can demystify the concept
technology acceptance discussions. This enhancement suggests of cryptocurrencies and potentially accelerate their mainstream
that for newer technologies, a foundational level of knowledge or acceptance.
awareness might be a pre-requisite before users can even begin to
gauge the ease of use or usefulness. This research’s emphasis on Strengthening trust in cryptocurrency. The inherent nature of
awareness invites future theoretical explorations on how aware- cryptocurrency, with its foundation in cryptographic algorithms
ness is cultivated, its potential barriers, and its progressive and blockchain technology, already provides a level of security
influence on user acceptance as technologies evolve. and transparency that is unparalleled in many traditional finan-
cial systems. Blockchain’s decentralized and immutable ledger
Introduction of trust in TAM. Trust, particularly in financial ensures that transactions are transparent and resistant to tam-
domains, is a multifaceted construct that encompasses cognitive, pering. However, trust in cryptocurrency goes beyond the mere
emotional, and behavioral dimensions. By weaving trust into the technological facets.
fabric of TAM as a moderating entity, this study illuminates the To begin, while blockchain and cryptography form the core of
complexities between logic-driven usability concerns and emo- the technology, the platforms, wallets, exchanges, and interfaces
tionally charged trust issues. Recognizing trust as a moderator that users interact with are not infallible. These can be susceptible
showcases the intricate balance consumers must strike when to hacking, mismanagement, or fraudulent schemes, as has been
considering the adoption of financial technologies: while they evidenced by numerous high-profile cryptocurrency thefts and
may perceive cryptocurrencies as easy to use or useful, trust or exchange failures. To address these concerns, tech developers and
lack thereof can significantly skew these perceptions and con- financial institutions should continuously invest in enhancing the
sequent behaviors. This enriched understanding of trust’s mod- security of these peripheral platforms. This can include multi-
erating role invites deeper dives into the nuances of trust—how it factor authentication, cold storage solutions, and regular security
is established, maintained, and potentially restored—in the con- audits.
text of the technology adoption of cryptocurrency. Next, for many potential adopters, the complex technicalities of
blockchain and cryptography can be overwhelming. They might
Responding to scholarly calls. Academic discourse thrives on the not fully grasp the intricacies of how these technologies bolster
interconnectedness of scholarly pursuits. By heeding the calls of security, leading to hesitations in adoption. To mitigate this, there
Kumar et al. (2021) and others, this study stands as a testament to is a need for transparent communication that demystifies these
the collaborative nature of academic advancement. Addressing concepts for the average user. Educational initiatives that simplify
gaps identified by predecessors not only strengthens the study’s and explain the technological underpinnings can foster trust
relevance but also positions it as a responsive piece of scholarly among users who might be on the fence due to a lack of
work. It also sets the stage for potential reciprocal advancements, understanding.
as future researchers might build upon these findings, leading to Lastly, the regulatory landscape plays a pivotal role in shaping
an iterative and collaborative expansion of knowledge in the trust. In the absence of clear regulatory guidelines, the
domain, in this case, cryptocurrency. cryptocurrency market can become a wild west of sorts, with
potential risks for investors and users. Policymakers can help
Theoretical generalizability and extension. As Lim (2018) cultivate trust by introducing balanced regulations that protect
emphasized, the true strength of a theory lies not just in its users without stifling innovation. This could involve setting
foundational tenets but also in its adaptability to new contexts standards for cryptocurrency exchanges, mandating transparency
and challenges. By demonstrating TAM’s applicability in the in initial coin offerings (ICOs), or establishing a legal framework
cryptocurrency arena and further enhancing it with new con- for the resolution of disputes in the crypto domain.
structs, this study magnifies the theory’s robustness. This act of
both generalizing and extending underscores the importance of Tailoring education and outreach initiatives. The interplay
continually revisiting and refining theoretical models, ensuring between awareness, ease of use, and usefulness suggests that a
they remain relevant and reflective of evolving technological one-size-fits-all approach to cryptocurrency education might be
landscapes. suboptimal. Different demographic groups might have varied
levels of technological proficiency and financial literacy. Policy-
makers and institutions should consider these nuances when
Practical implications. The findings of this research, while deeply designing outreach programs. For instance, younger demo-
embedded in academic exploration, carry profound implications graphics might be more receptive to digital workshops or mobile
for real-world applications, especially for policymakers, financial apps that educate about cryptocurrencies, while older groups
institutions, and technology developers. As the digital world might benefit from traditional seminars or literature.
Informed policy making. Our research equips policymakers with graduates, whose perspectives and lifestyles might differ con-
insights into the multifaceted factors that influence cryptocurrency siderably from those who are less educated. Their propensity to be
adoption. With a nuanced understanding of the role of awareness more liberal, technologically advanced, and quicker to engage with
and trust, governments can make informed decisions when crafting novel concepts might influence their receptiveness to crypto-
policies around cryptocurrency regulation. For example, by currencies. Future studies could benefit from exploring different
recognizing the importance of trust, policymakers might emphasize demographic variables and diverse population samples.
transparency and accountability in cryptocurrency transactions, Another constraint is the geographical scope of the study. The
mandating periodic audits or setting up regulatory bodies specifi- data were predominantly drawn from respondents in Lahore,
cally for monitoring cryptocurrency-related activities. Pakistan. Expanding this to other prominent cities like Faisala-
bad, Multan, Islamabad, and Karachi could present a more
comprehensive picture of cryptocurrency acceptance across dif-
Conclusion ferent urban contexts in the country. Moreover, an international
In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, the role of crypto- comparison of cryptocurrency adaptability, contrasting Pakistan
currencies has emerged as a significant paradigm shift in our with both developed and developing nations, might provide
understanding of finance and monetary transactions. This study, intriguing insights.
through its adoption and extension of TAM to the realm of Furthermore, while this research has prioritized awareness as a
cryptocurrency, has cast light upon the intricate dynamics central variable, there are other pertinent variables left uncharted.
underpinning the acceptance and adoption of such innovative Aspects such as government support, societal influences, and even
financial technologies. technological design could be examined within the framework of
The findings suggest that awareness is a foundational element TAM in subsequent studies.
in the acceptance process. A heightened level of understanding Moreover, it is important to note the specificity of the variables
substantially bolsters consumers’ perceptions regarding the ease explored. This research primarily centered on adoption-centric
of use and usefulness of cryptocurrencies. Noteworthily, the variables of cryptocurrencies. Expansive variables, such as the
established constructs of ease of use and usefulness in TAM long-term sustainability of cryptocurrencies and facets like Bit-
remain significant predictors for cryptocurrency adoption, coin mining, warrant examination in future research endeavors.
emphasizing the robustness of the model even in novel contexts. Last but not least, a procedural limitation arises from the
More importantly, trust acts as a pivotal moderating variable. methodology employed: data collection at a single point in time
While the inherent cryptographic nature and blockchain foun- using an adapted questionnaire. It would be invaluable for future
dations of cryptocurrency provide a baseline of trust, it is the researchers to embrace a longitudinal research approach, which
additional psychological facets of confidence and reliability that would lend robustness and ensure the consistency and validity of
influence adoption. findings over time.
Theoretically, our findings serve as a testament to the gen- In closing, this study underscores the transformative potential
eralizability and versatility of TAM, affirming its applicability of cryptocurrencies in reshaping our financial future. However,
even in complex, relatively nascent domains like cryptocurrency. for this potential to be fully realized, understanding and addres-
By integrating the pivotal variables of awareness and trust into the sing the intricacies of user awareness, acceptance, and adoption,
model, this research has not only enriched TAM but has also as delineated in this research, will be pivotal. We remain hopeful
provided a nuanced understanding of how individuals perceive, that our findings will serve as a cornerstone for both academic
trust, and ultimately decide to use or abstain from using cryp- and practical endeavors in the realm of cryptocurrency, propel-
tocurrencies. Our study underscores that while technological ling us towards a more inclusive, transparent, and trustworthy
advancements like cryptography and blockchain lay the digital financial landscape.
groundwork, the human factors of awareness and trust become
instrumental in the decision-making processes surrounding
technology adoption in financial contexts. Data availability
Practically, our findings carry profound implications for pol- The data used in this study can be made available by the corre-
icymakers, financial institutions, and tech developers. The sponding author(s) upon reasonable request.
recognition that awareness and trust are cardinal in driving
cryptocurrency adoption means stakeholders have a roadmap for Received: 20 May 2023; Accepted: 8 December 2023;
fostering a more inclusive and transparent digital financial eco-
system. Whether it is through comprehensive educational cam-
paigns, fortified security measures, or sensible regulation, the path
to bolstering public confidence and understanding in crypto-
currencies has been delineated.
As with all explorations, our study opens the doors to References
Abdul-Rahim R, Bohari SA, Aman A, Awang Z (2022) Benefit–risk perceptions of
numerous avenues for future research. Questions regarding the fintech adoption for sustainability from bank consumers’ perspective: the
long-term sustainability of cryptocurrencies, the evolving reg- moderating role of fear of COVID-19. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14).
ulatory landscape, or the potential integration of other behavioral https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148357
and societal factors into the adoption model all warrant further Aboalsamh HM, Khrais LT, Albahussain SA (2023) Pioneering perception of green
fintech in promoting sustainable digital services application within smart
investigation. Additionally, as the world of cryptocurrency con- cities. Sustainability (Switz) 15(14):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/
tinues to evolve with the introduction of new technologies and su151411440
platforms, continuous assessment of user acceptance and trust Akther T, Nur T (2022) A model of factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine
will be paramount. acceptance: a synthesis of the theory of reasoned action, conspiracy theory
Despite the important contributions this study offers, several belief, awareness, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. PLoS ONE
17(Jan):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261869
limitations exist that provide avenues for future research endeavors Albayati H, Kim SK, Rho JJ (2020) Accepting financial transactions using block-
to delve deeper into the underlying problem. One salient limitation chain technology and cryptocurrency: a customer perspective approach.
is the focus on a demographic predominantly consisting of Technol Soc 62:101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101320
Allen F, Gu X, Jagtiani J (2022) Fintech, cryptocurrencies, and CBDC: financial vulnerable and low-income communities. Energy Res Soc Sci
structural transformation in China. J Int Money Financ 124:102625. https:// 84(Aug):102394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102394
doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102625 Jalan A, Matkovskyy R, Urquhart A, Yarovaya L (2023) The role of interpersonal
Almajali DA, Masa’Deh R, Dahalin ZMD (2022) Factors influencing the adoption trust in cryptocurrency adoption. J Int Financ Mark, Inst Money
of Cryptocurrency in Jordan: an application of the extended TRA model. 83(Dec):101715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101715
Cogent Soc Sci 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2103901 Johar S, Ahmad N, Asher W, Cruickshank H, Durrani A (2021) Research and
Arpaci I, Bahari M (2023) A complementary SEM and deep ANN approach to applied perspective to blockchain technology: a comprehensive survey. Appl
predict the adoption of cryptocurrencies from the perspective of cyberse- Sci 11(14):6252. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146252
curity. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107678 Kakinaka S, Umeno K (2022) Cryptocurrency market efficiency in short- and long-
Basuki R, Tarigan ZJH, Siagian H, Limanta LS, Setiawan D, Mochtar J (2022) The term horizons during COVID-19: An asymmetric multifractal analysis
effects of perceived ease of use, usefulness, enjoyment and intention to use approach. Financ Res Lett 46(PA):102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.
online platforms on behavioral intention in online movie watching during the 102319
pandemic era. Int J Data Netw Sci 6(1):253–262. https://doi.org/10.5267/J. Khan MZ, Ali Y, Sultan HBin, Hasan M, Baloch S (2020) Future of currency: a
IJDNS.2021.9.003 comparison between traditional, digital fiat and cryptocurrency exchange
Bibi S (2023) Money in the time of crypto. Res Int Bus Financ 65:101964. https:// mediums. Int J Blockchain Cryptocurrencies 1(2):206. https://doi.org/10.
doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101964 1504/ijbc.2020.109003
Biswas A, Bhattacharya D, Kumar KA (2021) DeepFake detection using 3D- Kher R, Terjesen S, Liu C (2021) Blockchain, Bitcoin, and ICOs: a review and
Xception net with discrete Fourier transformation. J Inf Syst Telecommun research agenda. Small Bus Econ 56(4):1699–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/
9(35):161–168. https://doi.org/10.52547/jist.9.35.161 s11187-019-00286-y
Chen L, Aklikokou AK (2020) Determinants of E-government Adoption: testing Kim J, Merrill K, Collins C (2021) AI as a friend or assistant: the mediating role of
the mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Int J perceived usefulness in social AI vs. functional AI. Telemat Inform
Public Adm 43(10):850–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989 64(Aug):101694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101694
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of Kumar S, Lim WM, Pandey N, Westland JC (2021) 20 years of electronic com-
information technology. MIS Q: Manag Inf Syst 13(3):319–339. https://doi. merce research. In: Electronic Commerce Research (vol. 21, Issue 1).
org/10.2307/249008 Springer, USA
Deebak BD, Memon FH, Dev K, Khowaja SA, Wang W, Qureshi NMF (2022) Kumar S, Lim WM, Sivarajah U, Kaur J (2023) Artificial Intelligence and Block-
TAB-SAPP: a trust-aware blockchain-based seamless authentication for chain Integration in Business: Trends from A Bibliometric-content Analysis.
massive IoT-enabled industrial applications. IEEE Trans Ind Inform Inf Syst Front 871–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10279-0
19(1):243–250. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2022.3159164 Li C, Khaliq N, Chinove L, Khaliq U, Popp J, Oláh J (2023) Cryptocurrency
Entrialgo M (2017) Are the intentions to entrepreneurship of men and women acceptance model to analyze consumers’ usage intention: evidence from
shaped differently? The impact of entrepreneurial role-model exposure and Pakistan. SAGE Open 13(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/
entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Res J 1–14. https://doi.org/10. 21582440231156360
1515/erj-2017-0013 Li J (2023) Predicting the demand for central bank digital currency: a structural
Fagan M, Kilmon C, Pandey V (2012) Exploring the adoption of a virtual reality analysis with survey data. J Monetary Econ 134:73–85. https://doi.org/10.
simulation: The role of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and per- 1016/j.jmoneco.2022.11.007
sonal innovativeness. Campus-Wide Inf Syst 29(2):117–127. https://doi.org/ Lim WM (2018). Dialectic antidotes to critics of the technology acceptance model:
10.1108/10650741211212368 conceptual, methodological, and replication treatments for behavioural
Farrukh M, Xu S, Baheer R, Ahmad W (2023) Unveiling the role of supply chain modelling in technology-mediated environments. 22, 1–11. https://doi.org/
parameters approved by blockchain technology towards firm performance 10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1651
through trust: the moderating role of government support. Heliyon Lu A, Deng R, Huang Y, Song T, Shen Y, Fan Z, Zhang J (2022) The roles of mobile
9(11):e21831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21831 app perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in app-based Chinese and
Farrukh M, Xu S, Naveed W, Nusrat S (2023) Investigating the impact of artificial English learning flow and satisfaction. Educ Inf Technol 27(7):10349–10370.
intelligence on human resource functions in the health sector of China: a https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11036-1
mediated moderation model. Heliyon 9(11):e21818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Martins JM, Shahzad MF, Javed I (2023) Assessing the impact of workplace har-
heliyon.2023.e21818 assment on turnover intention. Evid Bank Ind 7(5):1699–1722. https://doi.
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unob- org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-05-016
servable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39. https://doi. Martins JM, Muhammad FS, Shuo X (2023) Examining the factors influencing
org/10.2307/3151312 entrepreneurial intention to initiate new ventures: Focusing on knowledge of
Gaikwad A, Mavale S (2021) The impact of cryptocurrency adoption as a legal entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risk and entrepreneurial innovativeness
tender in El salvador. Int J Eng Manag Res 11(6):112–115. https://doi.org/10. in open innovation business model. Res Sq 1125–1146. https://doi.org/10.
31033/ijemr.11.6.16 21203/rs.3.rs-2664778/v1
Galariotis E, Karagiannis K (2020) Cultural dimensions, economic policy uncer- Martins JM, Shahzad MF, Xu S (2023) Factors influencing entrepreneurial inten-
tainty, and momentum investing: international evidence. Eur J Financ tion to initiate new ventures: evidence from university students. J Innov
0(0):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1782959 Entrep. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00333-9
Gong Y, Tang X, Chang EC (2023) Group norms and policy norms trigger different Matemba ED, Li G (2018) Technology in society consumers ’ willingness to adopt
autonomous motivations for Chinese investors in cryptocurrency investment. and use WeChat wallet: an empirical study in South Africa. Technol Soc
Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023- 53:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.12.001
01870-0 McCloskey DW (2006) The importance of ease of use, usefulness, and trust to
Granić A, Marangunić N (2019) Technology acceptance model in educational online consumers: An examination of the technology acceptance model with
context: a systematic literature review. Br J Educ Technol 50(5):2572–2593. older customers. J Organ End Use Comput (JOEUC) 18(3):47–65. https://doi.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864 org/10.4018/joeuc.2006070103
Gupta K, Arora N (2020) Investigating consumer intention to accept mobile Mizanur RM, Sloan TR (2017) User adoption of mobile commerce in Bangladesh:
payment systems through unified theory of acceptance model: an Indian Integrating perceived risk, perceived cost and personal awareness with TAM.
perspective. South Asian J Bus Stud 9(1):88–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/ Int Technol Manag Rev 103–124. https://doi.org/10.2991/itmr.2017.6.3.4
SAJBS-03-2019-0037 Nadeem MA, Liu Z, Pitafi AH, Younis A, Xu Y (2021) Investigating the adoption
Hasan R, Miah MD, Hassan MK (2022) The nexus between environmental and factors of cryptocurrencies—a case of Bitcoin: empirical evidence from China.
financial performance: Evidence from gulf cooperative council banks. Bus SAGE Open 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021998704
Strategy Environ 31(7):2882–2907. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3053 Namahoot KS, Rattanawiboonsom V (2022) Integration of TAM model of con-
Hasan SZ, Ayub H, Ellahi A, Saleem M (2022) A moderated mediation model of sumers’ intention to adopt cryptocurrency platform in Thailand: the med-
factors influencing intention to adopt cryptocurrency among university students. iating role of attitude and perceived risk. Hum Behav Emerg Technol 2022.
Hum Behav Emerg Technol 2022:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9718920 https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9642998
Hasgül E, Karataş M, Pak Güre MD, Duyan V (2023) A perspective from Turkey Parate S, Josyula HP, Reddi LT (2023) Digital identity verification: transforming
on construction of the new digital world: analysis of emotions and future KYC processes in banking through advanced technology and enhanced
expectations regarding Metaverse on Twitter. Humanit Soc Sci Commun security measures. Int Res J Mod Eng Technol Sci 09:128–137. https://doi.
10(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01958-7 org/10.56726/irjmets44476
Howson P, de Vries A (2022) Preying on the poor? Opportunities and challenges Quan W, Moon H, Kim S (Sam), Han H(2023) Mobile, traditional, and crypto-
for tackling the social and environmental threats of cryptocurrencies for currency payments influence consumer trust, attitude, and destination choice:
Chinese versus Koreans Int J Hospit Manag 108(Oct):103363. https://doi.org/ Uematsu Y, Tanaka S (2019) High‐dimensional macroeconomic forecasting and
10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103363 variable selection via penalized regression. Econ J 22(1):34–56. https://doi.
Rejeb A, Rejeb K, Alnabulsi K, Zailani S (2023) Tracing knowledge diffusion tra- org/10.1111/ectj.12117
jectories in scholarly Bitcoin research: co-word and main path analyses. J Risk Utz M, Johanning S, Roth T, Bruckner T, Strüker J (2022) From ambivalence to
Financ Manag 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16080355 trust: using blockchain in customer loyalty programs. Int J Inf Manag
Roscoe AM, Lang D, Sheth JN (1975) Follow-up methods, questionnaire length, 68(Mar):102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102496
and market differences in mail surveys. J Mark 39(2):20. https://doi.org/10. Völter F, Urbach N, Padget J (2021) Trusting the trust machine: evaluating trust
2307/1250111 signals of blockchain applications. Int J Inf Manag 68(Sept). https://doi.org/
Sagheer N, Khan KI, Fahd S, Mahmood S, Rashid T, Jamil H (2022). Factors 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102429
affecting adaptability of cryptocurrency: an application of technology accep- Voorhees CM, Brady MK, Calantone R, Ramirez E (2016) Discriminant validity
tance model. Front Psychol 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903473 testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies.
Sahoo S, Kumar S, Sivarajah U, Lim WM, Westland JC, Kumar A (2022). Block- J Acad Mark Sci 44(1):119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
chain for sustainable supply chain management: trends and ways forward. In: Wibasuri A (2022) Exploring the impact of relevant factors on the acceptance of
Electronic Commerce Research (Issue 0123456789). Springer, USA cryptocurrency mobile apps: an extended technology acceptance model
Salas A (2020) Literature review of faculty-perceived usefulness of instructional (TAM-3). 6(June). https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v6i1.1.971
technology in classroom dynamics. Contemp Educ Technol 7(2):174–186. Yayla A, Dincelli E, Parameswaran S (2023) A mining town in a digital land:
https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6170 browser-based cryptocurrency mining as an alternative to online advertising.
Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF (2014) PLS-SEM: looking back and moving forward. Inf Syst Front 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10386-6
Long Range Plan 47(3):132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.008 Yuen KF, Cai L, Qi G, Wang X (2021) Factors influencing autonomous vehicle
Schaupp LC, Festa M (2018) Cryptocurrency adoption and the road to regulation. adoption: an application of the technology acceptance model and innovation
Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Gov- diffusion theory. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 33(5):505–519. https://doi.org/
ernment Research: Governance in the Data Age, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 10.1080/09537325.2020.1826423
3209281.3209336 Zafar S, Riaz S, Mahmood W (2021). Conducting the cashless revolution in
Shahzad F, Shahzad MF, Dilanchiev A, Irfan M (2022) Modeling the influence of Pakistan using enterprise integration. August, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.5815/
paternalistic leadership and personality characteristics on alienation and ijeme.2021.04.02
organizational culture in the aviation industry of Pakistan: the mediating role Zou Z, Liu X, Wang M, Yang X (2023) Insight into digital finance and fintech: a
of cohesiveness. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/ bibliometric and content analysis. Technol Soc 73(Oct):102221. https://doi.
su142215473 org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102221
Shahzad F, Xiu GY, Wang J, Shahbaz M (2018) An empirical investigation on the
adoption of cryptocurrencies among the people of mainland China. Technol
Soc 55(Jan):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.05.006 Acknowledgements
Shahzad MF, Khan KI, Saleem S, Rashid T (2021) What factors affect the entre- This work received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of
preneurial intention to start-ups? The role of entrepreneurial skills, pro- China under grant numbers 72074014 and 72174016.
pensity to take risks, and innovativeness in open business models. https://doi.
org/10.3390/joitmc7030173
Shahzad MF, Xu S, Khan KI, Hasnain MF (2023) Effect of social influence, Author contributions
environmental awareness, and safety affordance on actual use of 5G tech- Conceptualization of study, data analysis, and original draft preparation, MFS; Pre-
nologies among Chinese students. Sci Rep 0123456789, 1–16. https://doi.org/ paration of data file, interpretation, results, and discussion, SN and MFH; Supervision,
10.1038/s41598-023-50078-4 reviewing, and editing, WML; Project administration, and resource management, SX and
Shahzad MF, Xu S, Rehman O, Javed I (2023) Impact of gamification on green MFS; Funding, SX. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the
consumption behavior integrating technological awareness, motivation, enjoy- manuscript.
ment and virtual CSR. Sci Rep 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48835-6
Shin D, Rice J (2022) Cryptocurrency: a panacea for economic growth and sus-
tainability? A critical review of crypto innovation. Telemat Inform Competing interests
71(Apr):101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101830 The authors declare no competing interests.
Siagian H, Tarigan ZJH, Basana SR, Basuki R (2022) The effect of perceived
security, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness on consumer
behavioral intention through trust in digital payment platform. Int J Data
Ethical approval
The Ethics Committee of Beijing University of Technology, China, approved this study
Netw Sci 6(3):861–874. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.2.010
under B20221105W. This study was conducted according to the 1964 Helsinki
Siska E (2023) Digital bank financial soundness analysis at PT Bank Jago Tbk. CAMEL
Declaration and Guidelines.
Framew Approach 3(3):527–532. https://doi.org/10.47065/arbitrase.v3i3.700
Stocklmayer S, Gilbert JK (2002) New experiences and old knowledge: Towards a
model for the personal awareness of science and technology. Int J Sci Educ Informed consent
24(8):835–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126775 Informed implied consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study. In
Sudzina F, Dobes M, Pavlicek A (2023) Towards the psychological profile of alignment with national regulations and institutional guidelines, this research did not
cryptocurrency early adopters: Overconfidence and self-control as predictors necessitate written informed consent. Instead, participants were required to complete an
of cryptocurrency use. Curr Psychol 42(11):8713–8717. https://doi.org/10. online informed consent process. During this process, they were clearly informed about
1007/s12144-021-02225-1 the following key aspects: (i) confidentiality, wherein personal information provided by
Sukumaran S, Bee TS, Wasiuzzaman S (2022) Cryptocurrency as an investment: the participants would remain confidential and would not be published or disclosed, and
the Malaysian Context. Risks 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10040086 (ii) use of data, wherein the data collected from the participants would be exclusively
Tan TM, Saraniemi S (2022) Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: future used for academic research purposes and not for any commercial activities. To proceed
directions in blockchain marketing. J Acad Market Sci 0123456789. https:// with their participation in the study, participants had to explicitly acknowledge their
doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00889-0 understanding and agreement by clicking the “agree and continue” button. This action
Tandon C, Revankar S, Parihar SS (2021) How can we predict the impact of the served as their consent to participate and allowed them to access and complete the
social media messages on the value of cryptocurrency? Insights from big data questionnaires.
analytics. Int J Inf Manag Data Insights 1(2):100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.jjimei.2021.100035
Tauni MZ, Fang HX, Rao ZuR, Yousaf S (2015) The influence of Investor per- Additional information
sonality traits on information acquisition and trading behavior: evidence Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material
from Chinese futures exchange. Personal Individ Differ 87(Aug):248–255. available at https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02528-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.026
Theiri S, Nekhili R, Sultan J (2022) Cryptocurrency liquidity during the Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Shuo Xu.
Russia–Ukraine war: the case of Bitcoin and Ethereum. J Risk Financ
24(1):59–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-05-2022-0103 Reprints and permission information is available at http://www.nature.com/reprints
Treiblmaier H, Sillaber C (2021) The impact of blockchain on e-commerce: a
framework for salient research topics. Electron Commer Res Appl Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
48(Apr):101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101054 published maps and institutional affiliations.
1. use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
2. use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
3. falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
4. use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
5. override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
6. share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at