VEL TECH MULTI TECH Dr RANGARAJAN Dr SAKUNTHALA
ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
No: 42, Avadi – Vel Tech Road, Avadi, Chennai – 600062.
SCHEME OF VALUATION
INTERNSHIP:
The parent Institution will examine/evaluate the student’s performance following its evaluation
method:
The interns will be evaluated through seminar presentation or viva-voce at the Institution,
(marks will be given by a group of experts from the Institution including the Mentor).
At Institution, the intern will be evaluated through a seminar/viva voce on his work, by a duly
constituted expert committee (One Internal and One external), on the following suggestive
aspects.
a) Nature of the Organization.
b) Initiative and Learning.
c) Acquisition of skill sets by the intern.
d) Internship Report and Documentation.
e) Duration of the Internship.
MARK DISTRIBUTION
a) Nature of the Organization – 30 Marks [Govt. – 30 Marks, Govt. Aided – 25 Marks,
Research Lab – 20 Marks, Other Organization – 10 Marks]
b) Initiative and Learning – 20 Marks
c) Acquisition of skill sets by the intern – 20 Marks.
d) Internship Report and Documentation – 20 Marks
e) Duration of the Internship – 10 Marks.
INTERNAL ASSESMENT
To allocate marks for an internal assessment, it is important to consider the specific components
and criteria that reflect the learning objectives and skills want to evaluate. Here is a general
template based on the nature of the assessment and the subject:
CAT – I CAT – II CAT – III After Final
Theory (Unit I & II) (Unit III & IV) (Unit V) Conversion
Examination
50 50 25 60 Marks
Assignment/ Case Study/ Seminar/ Mini Project/
Experimental Learning
Supporting CAT-I CAT-II CAT-III
Activity
UNIT UNIT - UNIT- 40 Marks
UNIT-IV UNIT - V
-I II III
20
20 20 20 20
(20*2=40)
Total 100 Marks
LABORATORY COURSES:
For laboratory courses and model lab assessments, it's important to focus on both the practical
skills and the understanding of scientific concepts. Here's a suggested mark allocation that
emphasizes these aspects:
Supporting Marks (75)
MODEL
Attendance Practical Skills TOTAL
Pre-Lab Lab Post-Lab LAB
and and
Preparation Report Quiz
Punctuality Experimentation
10 15 30 15 10 25 100
MODEL LAB & END SEMESTER PRACTICAL - MARK DISTRIBUTION
Data
Identification Practical Skills Analysis
Lab Collection Oral
of Lab and and Total
Record and Examination
Objective Experimentation discussion
Analysis
20 10 20 30 10 10 100
COURSES WITH LABORATORY COMPONENT / LABORATORY THEORY
COURSES WITH THEORY COMPONENT
Weightage of internal assessment and end semester examination marks will be 50% each.
The distribution of marks for the theory and laboratory components in the internal
assessments and end semester examination for different types of courses are provided in the
table.
L T P C Internal External
1 0 4 3 Laboratory (25%) Theory (25%) Laboratory only (25%)
1 0 2 2 Laboratory (25%) Theory (25%) Laboratory only (50%)
2 0 2 3 Theory (25%) Laboratory (25%) Theory (25%)
Laboratory (25%)
3 0 2 4 Theory (25%) Laboratory (25%) Theory (35%)
Laboratory (15%)
2 0 4 4 Theory (25%) Laboratory (25%) Theory (15%)
Laboratory (35%)
PROJECT (Phase I & Phase II)
PROJECT REVIEW - PHASE I (100 Marks)
For a Project Phase I Internal Review consisting of multiple stages (Review 1, Review 2, and
Review 3), it's important to allocate marks that reflect the progress and development at each
stage. Below is a suggested mark allocation:
Review 1 (Initial Planning and Research) - 30 Marks
1. Project Proposal and Objectives (10 Marks)
o Clarity of project objectives: 5 marks
o Feasibility and scope of the project: 5 marks
2. Literature Review and Research (10 Marks)
o Depth and relevance of literature review: 5 marks
o Identification of key research questions: 5 marks
3. Project Planning (10 Marks)
o Detailed project timeline and milestones: 5 marks
o Identification of resources and requirements: 5 marks
Review 2 (Progress and Development) - 35 Marks
1. Progress According to Plan (10 Marks)
o Adherence to the project timeline: 5 marks
o Completion of key milestones: 5 marks
2. Technical Development (15 Marks)
o Quality of initial prototypes or models: 5 marks
o Integration of research into development: 5 marks
o Problem-solving and innovation: 5 marks
3. Mid-Phase Presentation (10 Marks)
o Clarity and effectiveness of the presentation: 5 marks
o Ability to address feedback and questions: 5 marks
Review 3 (Final Review of Phase I) - 35 Marks
1. Completion and Refinement (15 Marks)
o Finalization of phase I deliverables: 5 marks
o Quality and refinement of project components: 5 marks
o Implementation of feedback from previous reviews: 5 marks
2. Documentation and Reporting (10 Marks)
o Completeness and organization of documentation: 5 marks
o Clarity and depth of analysis: 5 marks
3. Final Presentation and Review (10 Marks)
o Professionalism and clarity in the final presentation: 5 marks
o Ability to articulate future directions and next steps: 5 marks
PROJECT REVIEW - PHASE II (100 Marks)
For a Project Phase II Internal Review with multiple stages (Review 1, Review 2, and Review
3), the focus should be on advanced development, integration, testing, and finalization of the
project. Here's a suggested mark allocation:
Review 1 (Advanced Development and Integration) - 30 Marks
1. Advanced Technical Development (15 Marks)
o Progress in technical implementation: 5 marks
o Quality and innovation in solutions: 5 marks
o Integration of components and systems: 5 marks
2. Testing and Evaluation Plan (10 Marks)
o Development of a comprehensive testing plan: 5 marks
o Initial testing and debugging efforts: 5 marks
3. Interim Presentation (5 Marks)
o Clarity and effectiveness of the presentation: 3 marks
o Ability to articulate progress and challenges: 2 marks
Review 2 (Testing, Evaluation, and Refinement) - 35 Marks
1. Testing and Analysis (15 Marks)
o Execution of testing and evaluation: 5 marks
o Analysis of test results and data: 5 marks
o Identification and resolution of issues: 5 marks
2. Refinement and Optimization (10 Marks)
o Implementation of improvements and optimizations: 5 marks
o Adaptability and responsiveness to feedback: 5 marks
3. Mid-Phase Presentation (10 Marks)
o Clarity and coherence of the presentation: 5 marks
o Engagement with feedback and questions: 5 marks
Review 3 (Finalization and Reporting) - 35 Marks
1. Completion of Project Deliverables (15 Marks)
o Finalization of all project components: 5 marks
o Overall quality and functionality of the project: 5 marks
o Compliance with project objectives and specifications: 5 marks
2. Comprehensive Documentation (10 Marks)
o Completeness and accuracy of documentation: 5 marks
o Clarity and detail of final report: 5 marks
3. Final Presentation and Defense (10 Marks)
o Professionalism and clarity in the final presentation: 5 marks
o Ability to defend the project and articulate future applications or
improvements: 5 marks
