IDFB Testing Regulations v202006
IDFB Testing Regulations v202006
Table of Contents
VERSION
PART DESCRIPTION
DATE
Part 1 2017 June Conditioning
Part 2 2013 June Sampling
Part 3 2020 June Composition (Content Analysis)
Part 4 2013 June Fat and Oil
Part 5 2013 June Moisture
Part 6 2017 June Acidity (pH Value)
Part 7 2013 June Oxygen Number
Part 8 2010 Chloride Content (Test Method CANCELLED)
Part 9 2010 Deterioration (Test Method CANCELLED)
Part 10-A 2010 Fill Power with Tumble Dry Conditioning (Test Method CANCELLED)
Part 10-B 2020 June Fill Power with Steam Conditioning
Part 10-C 2013 June Down Power
Part 11-A 2013 June Turbidity with Automated NTU Meter
Part 11-B 2017 June Turbidity with Glass Turbidity Tube (Test method REINSTATED)
Part 11-C 2015 June Turbidity with Song Meter (Absorbance Method)
Part 12 2020 June Feather and Down Species
Part 13 2013 June Feather Pre-Sort
Part 14 2013 June Average Feather Length
Part 15 2013 June Composition of Blended Filling Materials - General
Part 15-A 2017 June Composition of Polyester Blended with Plumage
Part 15-B 2013 June Composition of Cellulose Fibers Blended with Plumage (Manual Method)
Part 15-C 2013 June Composition of Polyurethane Foam Blended with Plumage
Composition of Cellulose Fibers Blended with Plumage (Chemical
Part 15-D 2019 June
Separation Method)
Part 16 2017 June Color Separation
Part 17 2015 June Net Fill Weight (Mass)
Part 18 2013 June Evaluation of Durable Water Repellent Treatments (DWR)
Part 18-A 2015 June Hydrophobic Shake Test
Part 18-B 2017 June Added Water Weight During Shaking
Part 18-C 2015 June Laundry Durability of DWR Treatment
Part 18-D 2015 June Water Absorption (based on EN 13543:2001)
Part 18-E 2013 June Dry Time- Machine Dry
Part 18-F 2013 June Dry Time- Air Dry
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to
the terms of these regulations.
International Part 00
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations Version June 2020
Bureau © Copyright 2020 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 2 of 2
Table of Contents
VERSION
PART DESCRIPTION
DATE
Part 19 2019 June Compression and Recovery of Loose Fillings – 2017 June
Part 20 2019 June Evaluation of Plumage for Enhanced Down Clusters – 2019 June
Part 20-A 2019 June Glue Down Evaluation (CFDIA Comprehensive Method) – 2019 June
Part 20-B 2019 June Glue Down Evaluation (Visual and Microfiche Method) – 2019 June
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to
the terms of these regulations.
International Part 01
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2017
© Copyright 2017 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 1
Bureau
Conditioning
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the terms of these regulations.
Note: The English version of the IDFB Testing Regulations is the only official IDFB version. Upon written request, IDFB will grant permission for
translations of the testing regulation under the condition that such translations be provided to IDFB within 30 days of translation.
International Part 02
Down and Feather
IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2013
© Copyright 2013 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 3
Bureau
Sampling
2.1 General
Collecting a representative sample is critical in achieving accurate test results. The sampling methods explain how to
collect material from multiple bales of bulk down and feathers or multiple pieces of finished products. The number of
bales or finished products depends on the size of the delivery.
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Part 02
Down and Feather
IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2013
© Copyright 2013 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 2 of 3
Bureau
Sampling
2.4 Sampling of Down and Feathers from Finished Products
OPTION 1: Mix Multiple Pieces for testing as ONE Test Sample.
Table B- Numbers of finished products from which material shall be taken and mixed to
become ONE test sample
OPTION 1 allows mixing of material from multiple NOTE 1:If the down and feathers removed from all of the
finished products for testing as ONE sample. pieces listed weigh a total of less than 300 g, additional
pieces must be sampled to reach a weight of 300g.
Table B above, lists the number of finished products NOTE 2:If the amount of down and feathers collected is too
that should be opened and sampled to provide a large for the selected conditioning container, choose either
representative sample of the lot or shipment. Method 1, see (e) below or Method 2, see (f) below to reduce
Complete only one series of double tests on the sample the amount of the material to be conditioned
taken and mixed from the several products.
e) Method 1 -- Reducing Sample Amount Empty the
entire contents of a product into a large mixing
2.5 Procedure for Finished Products (OPTION 1)
container. Mix sample well. Remove equal amounts of
(Mix multiple finished products for a single test) material from the top, middle and bottom of the large
mixing container and place in a conditioning container
a) Collect three samples from three different places (200g is enough to complete all down and feather tests).
in each finished product. Determine the quantity Continue procedure in 2.5.d
and weight of each of the three samples from
Table B. Place all three samples from each f) Method 2 -- Reducing Sample Amount
finished product in a large conditioning Empty the entire contents of product into a square
container. frame or box of about 50 cm x 50cm and spread evenly.
Divide the square box by a diagonal cross of antistatic
b) Alternatively, empty the entire filling of each of material. Collect the content of two opposing triangles.
the selected finished products separately in a Repeat this dividing procedure until the desired sample
container. Mix the sample well. Remove three size is obtained (200g is enough to complete all down
and feather tests). Place in a conditioning container.
samples from the top, middle and bottom of the Continue procedure in 2.5.d
container. Determine the quantity and weight of
each of the three samples from Table B. NOTE 3: There is a disadvantage of Option 1 compared
with Option 2 (below, testing multiple products
c) Place all three samples from each finished product separately). If some of the products tested are filled with
in a large conditioning container. different material, Option 1 may not reveal this because
a single test results is provided. Option 2 will provide
d) Mix the sample well in the conditioning this data in the set of individual tests.
container. Condition the mixed sample as per
IDFB Testing Regulations Part 1.
Number of finished products Each finished product shall be If the entire filling of a product is
Extent of delivery
to be individually tested. tested separately. not sufficient to complete all the
Pieces Pieces required tests, two or more
1 – 100 1 The weight of the filling material products must be mixed together
101 – 500 2 needed is determined by the to achieve the 200g.
501 – 3000 3 number of tests.
For example: If each product has
3001 –10000 4
Normally, 200g is enough to only 100g then two products
10000 – 20000 5
complete all down and feather must be mixed together to
Over 20000 6 testing. achieve the minimum 200g.
a) Choose at random the number of finished products NOTE 3: If the entire content of a single finished product is
listed in Table C. too large for the conditioning container, choose from Method
1, 2 or 3 (e, f, or g below) to reduce the amount of the
material to be conditioned.
b) Empty the entire content of each finished product
e) Reducing Sample Amount – Method 1
into separate conditioning containers. Collect equal amounts of material from at least 3
(See NOTE 3 below if the entire content of a prod- different places in each finished product for a total of
uct is too large for conditioning container) 200g. (For example, if material is taken from 4 places –
take 50g from each place.) For a comforter or quilt,
c) Mix each sample well in its separate conditioning collect material from at least 20% of the squares. Place
container. Condition each mixed sample as per all of the material collected from the finished product in
IDFB Testing Regulations Part 1. a conditioning container. Continue procedure in 2.7.c
f) Reducing Sample Amount – Method 2
Empty the entire contents of a product into a large
d) Test the filling of each finished product separately. mixing container. Mix sample well. Remove equal
Report both the individual product test results and amounts of material from the top, middle and bottom of
the average test result. the mixing container to attain the needed sample
amount (200 g is enough to complete all down and
feather test). Place in a conditioning container.
Continue procedure in 2.7.c.
g) Reducing Sample Amount – Method 3
Empty the entire contents of a product into a square
frame or box of about 50cm x 50cm and spread evenly.
Divide the square box by a diagonal cross of antistatic
material. Collect the content of two opposing triangles.
Repeat this dividing until the desired sample size is
obtained (200g is enough to complete all down and
feather tests). Place in a conditioning container.
Continue procedure in 2.7.c.
• Place down clusters into weighing container F, and the b) Down and fibre separation (2nd separation)
feather fibre into weighing container H.
• Add together the contents of the weighing bottles F,
• Pick up the down fibre with the forceps and place it into
G, H, I, K and L as follows:
weighing container G. Do not remove entwined down
T2 = F + G + H + I + K + L
fibre from the down clusters. Only pick up the down
fibres that shake loose. where:
• If a down fibre is pulled from a down cluster while T2 = Total material analysed in 2nd separation
removing the feather fibre, the down fibre must be
placed with the down clusters in the weighing container F = Down clusters
F. G = Down fibre
H = Waterfowl feather fibre
• Place landfowl feather fibre or landfowl feathers into
I = Landfowl feathers/landfowl fibre
weighing container I.
Special Note: Small landfowl fibres are difficult to correctly K = Residue from 2nd separation
identify. Some small landfowl feathers look like down L = Waterfowl feathers from 2nd separation
clusters. Small landfowl feathers or landfowl fibres should (All contents expressed in grams)
be viewed in a microfiche or microscope to verify
identification. • Calculate the total percentage for each component
• If additional residue is found in the 2nd separation, place after both the first separation and the second
it into weighing container K. separation in relation to the total quantity analysed.
• If any waterfowl feathers are found in the 2nd separation, • For example, the total down cluster percentage is:
place them into weighing container L.
• Weigh the contents of the weighing containers to the E x F x 100 (%)
nearest 0.1 mg. T1 T2
The determination of the pH of an aqueous extract of natural NOTE: Prepare 2 separate 5 g samples and test both
materials may provide information on the “history” of the according to 6.3 (a-e).
material, e.g. of down and feathers, and of chemical
treatments (or mistreatments) of them.
a) Use scissors to cut approximately 5 g of the feathers
and down into pieces of approximately 1.5 mm.
6.2 Equipment and Reagents
Wear plastic gloves to avoid contact between the
sample and the human hand.
a) Equipment
b) Select the test specimen of 1 + 0.01 g from the cut
Analytical balance (accurate to at least 10 mg)
sample and place in a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask with
Scissors 5 ml of boiled, purified water. Macerate the material
Potentiometric pH apparatus with glass and with the glass rod until all material is wet. Add 65 ml
calomel electrodes of grade 3 water. Place stopper on the flask, shake,
Glass stoppered 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask then and allow to stand for 3 hours at room
100 ml beaker temperature, occasionally shaking mechanically or
Glass rod flattened at the end by hand.
Plastic gloves
Glass filter according to EN 1162, pore size = c) Decant extract into the 100 ml beaker (use glass
P-160 (according to ISO 4793) filter to avoid transferring of down and feathers).
Grade 3 Purified water (according to ISO e) Prior to determining the pH value of the test
3696:1987) (see also ISO 3071:2005) solutions according to section 6.3 (b), prepare and
Potassium acid phthalate buffer (0.05 molal standardise the potentiometer for operating by the
solution), pH 4.0 at 25 °C use of the appropriate buffer solution.
Sodium borate buffer (0.01 molal solution), pH
9.18 at 25 °C f) See ISO 3071:2005 – Determination of pH aqueous
extract for alternate test method.
pH = X.x
4.2 Equipment and Reagents f) Disconnect flask and filter the solvent through a
glass filter or cotton pledget via a funnel (which was
a) Equipment previously rinsed with solvent) into the beaker.
Soxhlet extractor g) Rinse extraction flask with solvent 5 to 6 times.
Thimbles with 1.5 mm thick cellulose membrane Evaporate solvent over low heat with current of air.
Extraction flask
Condenser h) Dry the beaker containing the fat/oil residue in the
Distillation adapter drying oven at 100 to 105 °C.
Analytical balance (accurate to at least 1 mg)
Water bath or hot plate i) Allow the material in the beaker to condition to room
Glass beaker temperature in the desiccator. Weigh the beaker
Glass filter or funnel with cotton pledget containing the residue. Repeat until the weight
Desiccator with desiccating agent (mass) is constant.
Drying oven
b) Reagents (one of the following three reagents) 4.4 Calculation and Reporting of Results
7.2 Reagents and Equipment NOTE: If the sample does not absorb water after 5
minutes of shaking on the shaking machine, the jar
a) Reagents can be vigorously shaken again by hand. If after 3
Grade 3 purified water (according to ISO minutes of vigorous shaking by hand, the plumage still
3696:1987), water must be 20°C ±2°C. does not absorb water, simply continue using the
3 mol/l Sulphuric Acid (6 N or 25 % H2S04) shaking machine for the final 25 minutes and proceed
0.02 mol/l Potassium Permanganate (N/10 or 0.1 as below.
N KMnO4
NOTE: The Potassium Permanganate should e) Filter the resulting liquid (aqueous extract,
be stored in a cool dry place such as a suspension) through the glass filter into a 2000 ml
refridgerator. beaker. Do not squeeze or wring excess liquid from
the plumage!
b) Equipment
Analytical Balance (accuracy to 0.1 mg) f) Prepare the second sample in the same way (a-e)
2000 ml round plastic jar with watertight lid (for
shaking) 7.4 Measurement
2000 ml glass or plastic beaker
a) Pour 100 ml of liquid into a 250 ml beaker
250 ml glass beaker
b) Add 3 ml of the 3 mol/l sulphuric acid to the beaker of
Horizontal shaking machine with 150 shakes per liquid.
minute and a shaking width of 30-40 mm)
c) Place the beaker of liquid on the magnetic stirrer and
Glass filter according to EN 1162, pore size P- titrate with potassium permanganate. Add potassium
160 (according to ISO 4793) permanganate at the rate of 0.02 ml until a faint pink
Full pipette 100 ml class A (ISO 648) colour persists in the liquid for 60 seconds.
Graduated pipette 5 ml (ISO 835-3) d) Repeat the procedure (a-c) for the second sample
Micro-burette with divisions of 0.02 ml e) Also complete a blank test with 100 ml distilled water.
(Eppendorf Pipette)
Stopwatch 7.5 Calculation and Reporting of Results
Magnetic stirrer
Plastic or Rubber Gloves a) Calculate results as follows:
A = quantity in ml of potassium permanganate used
7.3 Sample Preparation in the test samples (average)
B = quantity in ml of potassium permanganate used
a) Place two representative samples of l0g each in the blank test
(± 0.1 g) in the two 2000 ml plastic jars. Oxygen Number = 80 x (A – B)
Wear gloves while preparing samples to avoid
contact with hands. Calculate the average or arithmetical mean of the
b) Add 1 litre of grade 3 purified water. two measurements rounded to one decimal place.
c) After attaching the watertight lid, shake the material b) Report results as follows:
by hand 10-15 times (or more but no longer than 2
minutes) to make sure that the plumage begins to Oxygen number = XX.x
absorb water.
shaking direction
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Part 09
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2013
© Copyright 2013 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 1
Bureau
Verification of Deterioration
NOTE: Part 10-B Steam Conditioning is the official IDFB method for fill power.
Fill Power is a volumetric measurement which is used Note: Prepare and test two separate samples
to determine the approximate insulation value of
down and feather fillings. It measures the volume a Before placing samples in climate conditioned room as
specific amount of down occupies under specific per 10-B.4, steam condition as follows:
conditions. a) Equipment for Steaming
10-B.2 Description: Automated Filling Power Meter 1. Portable Steam Machine (Steam Cleaner that
(For example: Lorch IDFB-FP Machine) provides medium pressure steam)
• Pressure: 40-50 psi (3-3.5 bar)
Cylinder diameter 288 mm • Heater: 1400-1800 Watt
height Minimum 500 mm • Nozzle: single flow, sprayer style, 2 mm ,
filling amount 30 g (+ 0.1 g) steam temperature of 105°C at nozzle
• (Example: Kärcher 1201)
Weight plate: diameter 284 mm
material PMMA 2. Hair Dryer (Approximately 1500 Watt)
suspension flexible
load weight 94.25 g 3. Fill Power Conditioning Box
• Frame: 40cm x 40cm x 40 cm (outside
specific pressure 0.149 g/cm²
dimensions)
sinking speed 0.54 m/min
• Screen Size: 35cm x 35cm, ( on 4 sides only,
number of holes 128
not on bottom or cover plate)
hole diameter 3 mm
• Screen: Nylon or metal mesh, with 1-1.19 mm
opening (14 or 16 Tyler mesh).
Measure after 60s from the time when the lowering
speed falls below 0.3 m/min
Note: If Fill Power Conditioning Box size is not as listed
Loosening: by air blowing 5 seconds above, please record size on report. Minimum volume of
Air volume: 30 l box must be 60,000 cm3 .
3. Wait for 5 ( ±2 ) minutes. Use the hair dryer to Blower: Blow the material twice for 5 seconds
completely dry down and feathers for at least 2 before the first test and once for 5 seconds before
minutes (at least 30 seconds per each side of the subsequent tests.
conditioning box).
d. Measuring with the automated FP meter
Check by hand to make sure plumage is dry.
If plumage is not dry, continue drying. After pressing the starting button, the weight plate
moves downward with the pre-set speed of 0.54
4. Dry the inside of the conditioning box if wet.
m/min.
5. Steam the 2nd sample as per 10-B.3b)1-3
As soon as the weight plate touches the material in
the container and the lowering speed falls below 0.3
m/min due to the counteracting force of the filling,
10-B.5 Condition in Climate Condition Room the load time (= 1 minute) begins.
Condition the samples for 48 - 72 hours in a fill The value of the filling height (volume) is displayed
power conditioning box in a climate conditioned continuously. Record the printout value determined
room as per IDFB Testing Regulations Part 1. after a dropping time of one minute.
Repeat loosening and measuring 3 times for each of
the two samples.
10-B.6 Procedure
Wooden Rods: (See 10-B.3) Hold the wooden rods On the basis of the mm Filling Height value, fill power
from the very top and place the rods against the wall can also be calculated and reported as follows:
of the cylinder until the bottom has been reached.
Loosen the down by raising the rods against the Filling Height in mm x 2.20 = XXX cm³/g (or)
opposite wall of the cylinder with a short, slow
Filling Height in mm / 0.252= XXX in³/30g
diagonal shaking motion. Repeat this process five
times starting in different places along the wall of
the cylinder.
For the past 20 years the IDFB Fill Power cylinder has
always required 30g of material for all of the above
measurements.
Traditionally, the unit “cubic inches per ounce” (in3/oz) were
reported (even though 30g was used when testing).
From the beginning the automated IDFB fillpower meter used
a cylinder that was larger and heavier than the old USA
cylinder.
After research, IDFB determined that the value of testing one
ounce (28.4 g)in the old USA cylinder was about the same as
testing 30g in the newer, larger IDFB cylinder. 20 years of
experience have confirmed the close correlation of the two
measuring devices.
To avoid any confusion, IDFB will now use “cubic inches per
30 g” (in /30g) as the official measuring unit.
Always fill the IDFB cylinder with 30 g of down and
feathers. (Not with one ounce, or 28.4 g)
Note 2:
No other cylinders, conditioning methods or any other
modifications may be implemented or used. Any
deviations from the exact procedure and equipment
must be clearly stated on the test report.
Note 3:
If any other conditioning method is used, the test report
shall specify the alternative method and include the
statement “STEAM CONDITIONING is the official
IDFB Fill Power Conditioning Method”.
Note 4:
Sample must be left in conditioning room until stable
weight is achieved. Conditioning room humidity and
temperature should be consistent throughout the room.
Therefore, proper temperature and humidity must be
maintained for the duration of the conditioning period.
Note 5:
Always complete Fill Power testing inside the climate
conditioned room.
11-A.2 Reagents and Equipment e) Pre-filter the resulting liquid (aqueous extract,
suspension) through a coarse screen (to prevent the
a) Reagents
glass filter from clogging). Then filter the liquid
Grade 3 purified water (according to ISO through the glass filter into a 2000 ml beaker. Do not
3696:1987), squeeze or wring excess liquid from the plumage.
Water must be 20° C (±2° C)
NTU Calibration Liquid, 10 NTU f) Prepare the second sample in the same way (a-e)
NTU Calibration Liquid, 1 NTU
11-A.4 Procedure for Measurement
b) Equipment
Analytical Balance (accuracy to 0.1 mg) a) Fill vial of the turbidity meter with the liquid.
2000 ml round plastic jar with watertight lid b) Shake the vial for 2 –3 seconds.
(for shaking) c) Place the vial in the NTU meter.
2000 ml glass or plastic beaker d) After five seconds measure the NTU value in the vial
Horizontal shaking machine with 150 shakes three separate times. (Do not remove vial or wait
per minute and a shaking width of 30-40 mm) between measurements).
Glass filter according to EN 1162, e) Record the three measurements
pore size = P-160 (according to ISO 4793)
f) Repeat a – e for two additional vials of liquid. (A
Stopwatch
total of nine measurements for the sample is
Plastic or rubber gloves recorded.)
Automated nephelometric turbidity meter g) Repeat the entire test a – f for the second sample
(NTU meter) prepared in section 11-A.3.
For example: LaMotte NTU Meter. (Record a total of 18 measurements for the two
separately prepared samples.)
11-A.3 Sample Preparation
11-A.5 Calculation and Reporting of Results
NOTE: Prepare and test two separate samples
a) Place one representative sample of l0 g (± 0.1 g)
a) Calculate the average or arithmetical mean of all 18
in the 2000 ml plastic jar. Wear gloves while
recorded values, rounded to two decimal places.
preparing sample to avoid contact with hands.
b) Report the result as follows:
b) Add 1 litre purified water of quality 3.
Turbidity = XX.xx NTU
c) After attaching the watertight lid, vigorously
shake the jar by hand 10-15 times or more, but
no longer than 2 minutes) to help the plumage
begin to absorb water.
shaking direction
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Part 10-C
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2013
© Copyright 2013 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 2
Bureau
Volume Measurement (Down Power) – with Steam Conditioning
a) Antistatic treatment of measuring cylinder f) Procedure for the 2nd and 3rd Measurements
Wash the measuring cylinder a minimum of once 1. Lift up the cylinder and place it on the rotating
per day and at least after every 30 measurements. stand.
2. Put the hopper in front of the base.
Wash the cylinder and weight plate with a soft 3. Rotate the cylinder toward the hopper and slowly
cotton cloth using an anionic active detergent empty the cylinder into the hopper.
diluted to the normal household concentration. 4. Repeat the measurement as per 10-C.4.e)
Note 1:
d) Filling the Measuring Cylinder from the Hopper Pre-conditioning of the sample with the steamer should
be performed outside the conditioning room.
1. Set the hopper on top of the measuring cylinder.
2. Open the bottom of the hopper and allow the Note 2:
sample to fall very gently into the cylinder by Testing of the sample in the cylinder should be
using the stirring rod. performed inside the conditioning room
3. When stirring the sample, avoid electrostatic
generation in the down material.
4. Remove the hopper from the top of the cylinder.
5. Carefully make the sample level uniform.
6. Do not stir or blow the sample after placing in
the cylinder.
shaking direction
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Part 11-C
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2015
© Copyright 2015 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 1
Bureau
These species tips and photos have been made available by Mr. Shinobu Endo of QTEC and the Japan Down Products
Corporative Association.
15-B.1 General
d) The amount of the material tested in the 2nd
Cellulose-based fibres – such as Rayon (Viscose), separation must also be more than specified in IDFB
Lyocell (Tencel®), or Milkweed – can be blended with Part 3.
down and feathers. These fibres are very difficult to
separate from down and feathers. Use at least 0.3 g for each 2nd separation.
The manual composition/content analysis must be If the cellulose-based portion is very high use
completed with special care according to the following 0.4 g or more for the 2nd separation.
instructions.
15-B.3 Calculation and Reporting of Results for the d) Calculate the composition of the down and feather
Cellulose-based Fibres (CbF) & Plumage portion by dividing each plumage component by the
total percentage of down and feathers.
a) Calculate results as follows from the average of all
special manual composition tests: For example:
15.1 General 15.2 List of Test Methods for Blended Filling Materials
Down and feathers are often mixed with other natural or IDFB Part 15-A Composition of Down and Feathers
synthetic materials. blended with Polyester Fibres.
Each different material that is blended with down and IDFB Part 15-B Composition of Down and
feathers requires a different test method Feathers blended with Cellulose-based Fibres.
It is sometimes difficult to determine the composition of
such blended filling materials. IDFB Part 15-C Composition of Down and
Feathers blended with Polyurethane Foam.
The down and feather portion of blends must be
separated from the other material so that a composition
(IDFB Part 3) may be completed.
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Part 15-A
Down and Feather
IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2017
© Copyright 2017 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 2 of 4
Bureau
Composition of Down and Feathers Blended with – POLYESTER
15-A.4 Calculation and reporting of results for the 15-A.6 Procedure
Chemical Separation (Sodium Hypochlorite)
a) Calculate results as follows: a) Four samples of approximately 10 g will be
● W1 = Initial weight of the sample chemically separated by dissolving the down and
feathers using the Sodium Hydroxide solution. Repeat
If using gauze: (b-k) for each sample to be tested.
● W2 = Initial weight of the gauze b) Combine 10g of test sample with 500 ml 5%
● W3 = Weight of the gauze and polyester concentration of NaOH in 1500 to 2000 ml glass
● W4 = W3-W2 (Polyester Weight) beaker
c) Place glass beaker in water bath and bring to 100°C
If using mesh sieve: on the hot plate for 15 minutes.
● W4 = Weight of the polyester d) Allow beaker to cool at room temperature for
appropriately 25 minutes.
Note: If the initial weight from 15-A.3.c was an e) Pour mixture out into number 200 mesh sieve
absolute dry mass add 0.4% to W4 allowing material to be filtered out.
● W5 = W1-W4 (Weight of the plumage) f) Rinse material in sieve with hot distilled water.
g) Rinse material in sieve with 250 ml of 2%
Note: If the initial weight from 15-A.3.c was an concentration HCl.
absolute dry mass add 13% to W5 h) Rinse material in sieve with hot distilled (grade 3)
Polyester Content = (W4)/W1 * 100% water again.
Plumage Content = (W5)/W1 * 100% i) Place filtered material into clean 400 ml glass beaker.
Note: If there a known Polyester Burn Percentage, j) Dry in oven at 50°C or place in desiccator until
calculate as the following: sample maintains a constant weight.
● PB = Polyester Burn Percentage k) Weigh material on scale (= W2).
Polyester Content + PB = Final Polyester Content Note: Polyester fibres may be constructed or treated with other
Plumage Content - PB = Final Plumage Content materials that also dissolve with a chemical reagent. Such polyester
must be tested separately in order to calculate the Polyester Burn
Average the results of all tests. Percentage. The Polyester Burn Percentage is the percentage of
dissolved portion of the constructed or treated polyester.
b) Report the results as follows:
15-A.7 Calculation and reporting of results for the
XX.x % Final Plumage (Down and Feathers) Chemical Separation (Sodium Hydroxide)
XX.x % Final Polyester Fibre a) Calculate results as follows:
W1 = Initial weight of the sample
OPTION 2 – Chemical Separation W2 = Weight of polyester material
using Sodium Hydroxide W3 = W1-W2 (Weight of the plumage)
15-A.5 Reagents and Equipment
a) Reagents Polyester Content = (W2)/W1 * 100%
Plumage Content = (W3)/W1 * 100%
Purified water (grade 3, ISO 3696:1987)
Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) solution 5% Note: If there a known Polyester Burn Percentage,
Hydrochloric Acid (HCl) solution 2% calculate as the following:
b) Equipment ● PB = Polyester Burn Percentage
Analytical Balance (accuracy to 0.1 mg)
1500 to 2000 ml glass beaker with stopper or Polyester Content + PB = Final Polyester Content
lid. Plumage Content - PB = Final Plumage Content
400 ml glass beaker
Hot plate Average the results of all tests.
1000 ml graduated flask
Temperature adjustable water bath b) Report the results as follows:
Oven (at 50°C ± 3°C)
XX.x % Final Plumage (Down and Feathers)
Desiccator (Silica Gel)
XX.x % Final Polyester Fibre
Thermometer
3-layer cotton Gauze, fat-free, yarn count 21,
thread count 21 x 28 /cm (or)
No. 200 (75 micron opening) mesh sieve
NOTE: If it is possible to accurately separate the polyester 15-A.12 Calculating and reporting of the combined
fibres manually from the down and waterfowl feather fibres, results from Chemical Separation and
the polyester % should be very close to the polyester Manual Composition Tests.
percentage found in the chemical separation.
a) Obtain and report results from the chemical
If the results are not close, additional 2nd separation testing separation:
can be done.
XX.x % Plumage (Down and Feathers)
If separation of fibres from the polyester is too difficult, XX.x % Polyester Fibre
complete a special 2nd separation as found in (a-g) below.
b) Obtain and optionally report initial results of the
a) Normally the polyester fibres are very difficult to special manual composition:
separate from the down and feather fibres.
Therefore complete a special 2nd separation with the TOTAL MATERIAL
following weighing containers. XX.x % Final Down Cluster
XX.x % Final Fibres (Down & Waterfowl Feather
F = down clusters Fibres - if fibres cannot be separated from
G = remains empty (normally down fibre) polyester)
H = remains empty (waterfowl feather fibre) XX.x % Waterfowl Feathers
I = landfowl feathers and fibre XX.x % Damaged/Broken Waterfowl Feathers
K = residue XX.x % Quill Feathers
L = waterfowl feathers XX.x % Landfowl Feathers and Fibres
XX.x % Residue
PF = Polyester and down fibre and
XX.x % Polyester (same as chemical separation)
waterfowl feather fibre
______
100.0 %
b) After calculating the total percentage of each
component, determine the percentage of down
c) Calculate the composition of the plumage portion
fibres and waterfowl feather fibres as follows:
alone by dividing each plumage component above by
the total percentage of plumage from 15-A.12a).
P = % Polyester Fibre from chemical
separation
For example:
PF = Polyester + down fibre + waterfowl
Plumage only Residue Percentage =
feather fibre from 2nd separation %
XX.x Residue % / XX.x % Plumage
Fibers (Combined down fibre and waterfowl
feather fibre %) = PF–P d) Report the calculated results of the plumage or down
and feather portion.
c) After calculating the percentage of down fibres and
waterfowl feather fibres, use the 5% “fiber PLUMAGE PORTION ONLY
allowance” as follows: XX.x % Final Down Cluster (Calculated)
Final Down Cluster = 1.05*F XX.x % Final Fibres (Calculated)
Final Fibres = Fibers – (0.5*F) (Down & Waterfowl Feather Fibres - if
fibres cannot be separated from polyester)
NOTE: Because down clusters are difficult to XX.x % Waterfowl Feathers (Calculated)
remove from the poly/down material, testing XX.x % Damaged/Broken Waterfowl Feathers
research has determined that approximately 5% of (Calculated)
the weight of the down clusters is lost due to mixing XX.x % Quill Feathers (Calculated)
and removing down clusters from the poly/down XX.x % Landfowl Feathers and Fibres (Calculated)
mix. This 5% loss is comprised of down fibers. XX.x % Residue (Calculated)
______
100.0 %
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Part 14
Down and Feather
IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2013
© Copyright 2013 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 1
Bureau
Average Feather Length
15-C.1 General
d) The amount of the material tested in the 2nd
Polyurethane Foam (PU Foam) can be blended with separation must also be more than specified in IDFB
down and feathers. If the PU foam is in a single core or Part 3.
cut in large pieces it is easy to separate from the
plumage. If the PU foam is shredded in small fine Use at least 0.3 g for each 2nd separation.
pieces, it may be more difficult to separate from down
If the foam portion is very high use 0.4 g or
and feathers.
more for the 2nd separation.
The manual composition/content analysis must be
completed with special care according to the following
instructions: e) Small PU foam pieces can be difficult to separate
from the down and feather fibres. The separation
requires very careful analysis. Complete special 2nd
separation with the following weighing containers.
15-C.2 Procedure for the Composition Analysis
with Special Instructions Listed Below F = down clusters
Complete the IDFB Part 3 Composition test with the G = down fibres
following special instructions: H = waterfowl feather fibres
I = landfowl feathers and fibres
a) The initial weight of the blended sample must be as K = residue
follows: PUF = polyurethane foam
Use at least 6 g for each of the two samples f) Complete the calculation of the composition with the
where the expected down content is less than added containers of PU foam from the 1st and 2nd
30% separation
Use at least 4 g for each of the two samples g) Average the results of the 2 samples. If the total of
where the expected down content is more than PU foam is significantly different in the two tests, a
30% third test should be completed. Then average all
three tests.
Use more than 4 g or 6 g if the expected PU
foam portion is more than 70% of total
material or if the PU foam and the plumage
are non-homogeneous (poorly mixed).
15-C.3 Calculation and Reporting of Results for the d) Calculate the composition of the down and feather
Polyurethane Foam (PUF) & Plumage portion by dividing each plumage component by the
total percentage of down and feathers.
a) Calculate results as follows from the average of all
special manual composition tests: For example:
● PUF % = % of PUF from 1st separation Plumage only Down Cluster Percentage =
+ % of PUF from 2nd separation
XX.x Down Cluster % / XX.x % Plumage
● Plumage Content% =100% – PUFContent %
b) Report the results as follows: e) Report the calculated results of the plumage or down
and feather portion.
XX.x % Plumage (Down and Feathers)
XX.x % Polyurethane Foam (PUF) PLUMAGE PORTION ONLY
XX.x % Down Cluster
c) Obtain and report results of all components from the XX.x % Down Fibres
special manual composition analysis: XX.x % Waterfowl Feather Fibres
XX.x % Waterfowl Feathers
TOTAL MATERIAL XX.x % Damaged/Broken Waterfowl Feathers
XX.x % Down Cluster XX.x % Quill Feathers
XX.x % Down Fibres XX.x % Landfowl Feathers and Fibres
XX.x % Waterfowl Feather Fibres XX.x % Residue
XX.x % Waterfowl Feathers ______
XX.x % Damaged/Broken Waterfowl Feathers 100.0 %
XX.x % Quill Feathers
XX.x % Landfowl Feathers and Fibres
XX.x % Residue
XX.x % Polyurethane Foam
_______
100.0 %
15-D.1 General g) Separately weigh the sieve and record its value up to
three decimal points.
Cellulose fibers can be blended with down and feathers.
h) After the shaking time, open the jar and ensure the
These fibers are very difficult to separate manually
bleach has dissolved the down and feathers
from down and feathers.
completely.
A chemical separation will help determine the NOTE: Bubbling will be observed while bleach is
percentage Cellulose present in a sample. reacting with the down, bubbling will dissipate as
amount of down and feathers decreases in the jar.
i) Pour and drain the contents of the jar into the sieve.
15-D.2 Reagents & Equipment j) Rinse the plastic jar with the purified water and drain
a) Reagents into the sieve.
• Purified water (grade 3 water according to ISO k) Rinse sample on the sieve thoroughly with the
3696:1987) purified water for about 3 minutes.
• Sodium Hypochlorite (NaClO) solution of l) Once sample has been completely rinsed remove the
0.9-1.1 mol/L (bleach) excess water by padding the sample with the fingers
and using a paper towel to absorb the water from the
b) Equipment bottom of the sieve.
• Analytical Balance (accuracy to 0.1 mg)
• 2000 ml round plastic jar with watertight lid • Ensure that Cellulose fibers don’t stick on the
(for shaking) glove.
• Stop watch • Spread the sample on the mesh to aid the drying
process.
• Horizontal shaking machine with 150 shakes
per minute and a shaking width of 30-40 mm
m) Place the sieve with the sample into the oven at
• Oven (can maintain 105°C ± 3°C)
105°C ± 3°C until a constant weight is achieved
• Desiccator (about 30 minutes).
• Standard sieve with stainless steel mesh n) Remove the sieve from the oven and place it in a
Number 200 (74 micron opening) desiccator for 20 minutes.
• Plastic or rubber gloves o) Weigh the sieve containing the sample.
• Paper towel p) Repeat steps b-n for the additional three samples.
This version replaces the June 2018 version of this test method.
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Part 15-D
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2019
© Copyright 2019 IDFB - All rights reserved
Bureau Page 2 of 2
This version replaces the June 2018 version of this test method.
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Part 16
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2017
© Copyright 2017 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 1
Bureau
Color Separation
16.1 General c) Review again all the material in the “Borderline”
This test method standardizes the separation of Beaker. Re-classify Borderline into White or
plumage into white and dark categories. This test is Dark if possible.
also known as the “black tip” test. .
d) The re-classification of “borderline” may occur
16.2 Equipment according to a national standard or a buyer/seller
Three 400 ml Glass Beakers or other containers specification.
marked: White Plumage, Dark Plumage and
Borderline Plumage e) In some cases, it may be proper to retain a
Forceps and Tweezers borderline category for reporting. The analyst’s
Analytical balance (accurate to at least 0.1 mg) judgment on impact in a finished product is
important in these decisions.
16.3 Sample Preparation
Prepare two samples of conditioned material for 16.5 Calculating and Reporting of Results
testing.
Use at least 4 grams for material where the a) Calculate % for each color group
down content is greater than 30%.
Use at least 6 grams for material where the % White = g White / g (White+Dark+Borderline) x 100
% Dark = g Dark / g (White+Dark+Borderline) x 100
down content is less than 30%. % Borderline = g Borderline / g (White+Dark+Borderline) x 100
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the terms of these regulations.
Note: The English version of the IDFB Testing Regulations is the only official IDFB version. Upon written request, IDFB will grant permission for
translations of the testing regulation under the condition that such translations be provided to IDFB within 30 days of translation.
International Part 17
Down and Feather
IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2017
© Copyright 2017 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 3
Bureau
Net Fill Weight (Determination of the Mass of the Filling)
17.1 General
17.5 Calculating and Report of Results
This IDFB test regulation specifies the method for
determining the gross product weight (mass of a) Calculate as follows
finished product) and the net fill weight (mass of
filling material). This document uses the term net W1 = Gross weight of filled product
fill weight in place of “mass of filling material”. W2 = Weight of fabric case or shell
W3 = Net weight of filling material
17.2 Equipment
W3 = W1 – W2
Scissors
Forceps and Tweezers
Seam Ripper
b) Reporting of Results
Large container for emptying
Vacuum Cleaner Report the results as follows:
Balance (accurate to at least 1 g)
Gross Weight = XXXX g
17.3 Sample Preparation Case/Shell Weight = XXXX g
Condition sample as per IDFB Part 01 for at least 24 Net Fill Weight = XXXX g
hours or until the finished product reaches a steady-
state weight. 17.6 Procedure for Chambered Products
Average the results of the two weights W1-a and c) Example: A two-chamber pillow contains feathers
W1-b and record as W1. in one chamber and down in the other chamber:
b) Open the filled product with a seam ripper or
scissors or by removing stitch lines and seams. M1 = Gross weight of filled product
Manually remove as much filling material as M2 = Weight of remaining product after
possible into a large container. (This material can removal of filling from Chamber 1
then be used for further down and feather tests.) M3 = Weight of fabric case or shell after
removal of filling from Chamber 2
c) Remove remaining filling material with a
vacuum cleaner or by vigorously shaking fabric Weight of Chamber Filling 1 = M1 – M2
shell. Weight of Chamber Filling 2 = M2 – M3
d) Examine both the inside and outside of the fabric
casing or shell and remove remaining filling
materials by hand or with forceps.
e) Weigh the empty fabric case or shell. Record the
result as W2-a.
Repeat the weighing of the empty fabric case or
shell (on a second balance, if possible) and
record the results as W2-b
Average the results of the two weights W2-a and
W2-b and record as W2.
GW = Gross weight of filled product NOTE: Repeat each weighing procedure twice and
average the results.
P1 = Weight of remaining product after
removal of filling from Panel 1 c) Calculate and report detailed panel results of sleeping
P2 = Weight of remaining product after as per c) and d) in Part 17.8.
Removal of filling from Panel 2
P3….P16, etc.
NOTE: Repeat each weighing procedure twice 17.10 Apparel (Jackets, Vests, etc)
and average the results. a) A detailed net fill weight can be reported for each
panel of a down jacket or vest
c) Calculate detailed results of a comforter:
b) For example: For a jacket that contains the following
Filling weight of Panel 1 = GW – P1 panels, the product must be weighed after emptying
Filling weight of Panel 2 = P1 – P2 each separate panel:
Filling weight of Panel 3-16 = as above
Hood
The added water weight test evaluates how much water a) Turn on the shaking machine and let it run for the
a down and feather sample retains at the point that it half of the time calculated (IDFB Part 18-A,
starts to take on water. “Hydrophobic Shake” Test) or for 8 minutes if
IDFB Part 18-A was not performed.
18-B.2 Equipment and Reagents
b) Remove the flasks from the shaker and replace the
a) Equipment top with the polyester mesh.
Secure the mesh on top of
Analytical Balance (accuracy to 0.1g) the flask with a rubber
4 Erlenmeyer flasks, ISO 24450, 500 ml capacity band.
Polyester mesh (to cover the flask neck) c) Drain the water for one
Rubber stoppers (size to close flask neck) minute at a 30 degree angle
Horizontal shaking machine with 150 shakes per down from the vertical
minute and a shaking width of 40 mm position.
Stopwatch
d) Weigh each flask and record
the weight of the flask after shaking.
b) Reagents 18-B.5 Calculations and Results
Grade 3 purified water (according to ISO a) Calculated the added water weight (A.W.W.) per
3696:1987) Temperature: 20° C (±2° C) sample according to the following formula:
A.W.W. = (Weight of sample after shaking) –
(Weight of empty flask) – (Weight of sample)
18-B.3 Sample Preparation
b) Calculate the average of each set of treated and
a) Prepare two sets of samples for testing: two untreated:
treated samples and two untreated samples.
A.W.W. of Treated Sample =
(NOTE: If only treated material is available, (A.W.W. T.1+ A.W.W. T.2) / 2
prepare samples, test and report the results of A.W.W. of Untreated Sample =
only the added water weight of the treated (A.W.W. T.1+ A.W.W. T.2) /2
material)
c) Calculate the difference in weight between the
b) Label each flask respectively: treated and untreated sample:
1.U, 2.U, 1.T, 2.T Weight Difference =
U=Untreated, T=Treated (A.W.W. of treated) – (A.W.W. of Untreated)
c) Weigh each flask and record each weight to 18-B.6 Reporting
0.01g.
a. Report the added water weight (A.W.W.) for the
d) Place a representative sample of 1.50g per flask treated and untreated material.
in the correctly labeled flask.
b. Report the weight difference.
e) Add 300 ml of distilled water in each flask.
The hydrophobic shake test demonstrates the DWR a) Turn on the shake machine and shake the samples
treatment’s ability to repel water and keep the down dry for 2 minute time increments.
as it is constantly shaken in water.
b) At the end of each time increment, remove the jars
18-A.2 Reagents and Equipment from the shaker to record the rating:
Place the jar vertically on a flat surface at eye
a) Reagents level for analysis and evaluation.
Grade 3 purified water (according to ISO Observe the level at which the bottom of the
3696:1987) Water must be 20° C (±2° C) bulk down sample is floating.
o Do not record the rating based off of loose
b) Equipment fibers in the water.
Analytical Balance (accuracy to 0.1 mg) Record the level of bulk down in water using the
Wide-mouth glass Mason jars or similar rating system:
(1 Quart / 1 Liter, 173 mm height). o The ratings correspond to the 5 lines drawn on
Horizontal shaking machine with 150 shakes per jar; each line is assigned a rating from 5 to 1.
minute and a shaking length of 40 mm. See the figure or Table 1 for examples.
Stopwatch Optional: Take photos of the jars at various
shake time increments for reference.
18-A.3 Sample Preparation Table 1: Hydrophobic Shake Test rating according to markings
Rating Significance and Description
a) Prepare two Mason jars per filling material.
5 Bulk down is completely above the water
b) Label each jar to identify the samples (Ex: 1 and 2, 4 Some bulk down is under water
or A and B) 3 Bulk down is half way under water
2 Bulk down is mostly submerged
c) Add 400 mL of the purified water to each jar. 1 Down completely submerged under water - complete saturation
d) Draw five lines on a strip of tape 1 cm apart, c) Repeat step A.4.a and A.4.b until saturation point
perpendicular to the length of the tape. The top line (complete saturation = rating 1 = bottom line).
must be placed at the same level as the top of the Continue shaking the samples until each jar
water, with the rest of the lines below. reaches the bottom line, rating 1 (saturation).
NOTE: If the sample is still a rating 5 after 20
e) Use a beaker to weigh two representative samples minutes of shaking, increase the time increments
of 2.0 grams (±0.01 grams) on the analytical to 20 minutes. If the sample remains rating 5
balance. after two hours, increase the increments to 30
minutes. If the sample remains rating 5 after six
f) Place each sample in the correctly labeled jar. hours, increase the increments to 60 minutes.
g) Close the jars and place them horizontally in the 18-A.5 Results
shake machine. Ensure that each jar is secured in
its position and will not move during the shaking a) The average saturation time is reported.
process. The shaking motion of the jar is from lid Average the complete saturation shake times of
to bottom as seen below. the two jars.
If the difference between the two shake times is
Shaking direction more than 5% , run a third jar for comparison.
Average the two jars that performed similarly.
Dry Time
(Machine dry)
18-E.1 General d) Place the sample in the drier at a time for 5 minutes.
• Reweight the sample every 5 minutes.
The dry time test helps evaluate how much faster a
e) Repeat step 18-E.4.d until the sample reaches the
treated sample will dry when compared to an untreated
original weight recorded in step 18-E.4.a
sample.
18-E.5 Results
18-E.2 Equipment a) The final time it takes the sample to reach the
a) Washing machine original weight (step E.4.a) is reported.
AATCC or ISO Home Laundry Standard 1)
Normal wash cycle, cold water. b) Calculate the added water weight and include the
drying curve on a weight vs time graph.
b) Drying machine • Subtract each recorded weight during the drying
AATCC or ISO Home Laundry Standard 1) process with the original weight.
Medium heat setting.
Example:
c) 40 cm x 40 cm
• 100% cotton fabric c) Plot a graph using the value of added water weight
• 230-300 threadcount for each time period.
• Plot all of the points from the untreated and the
18-E.3 Sample Preparation treated samples on the same graph in order to
compare the two.
a) Sew fabric into 4 equal squares, 20 x 20 cm,
leaving one opening on the edge of each square. Dry
Time
70
b) Place a representative sample of 15 grams per 60
Added
Water
Weight
(grams)
square. 50
• The entire pillow should contain 60 grams of 40 Treated
down. Down
30 Untreate
c) Sew the pillows completely shut. 20
d
Down
a) Weigh the finished pillow on a scale. Treated
Down
dried
in
25
minutes.
• Record the original weight.
b) Place the pillow in the washer. Untreated
Down
- -d-ried
- - -in
- 8- 0
- minutes.
1) AATCC Standards / ISO Standards
• Normal wash cycle – cold water.
The AATCC (American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists) fulfills similar
• Do not use laundry detergent. functions as the workgroups and technical committees of the International Organization
• Only wash one pillow at a time. for Standardization, ISO.
ISO Standard 6330 (“Domestic washing and drying procedures for textile testing”) in an
introductory note recommends that “the selection of washing machines and dryers [for
c) Weigh the sample immediately after it finishes the testing] has to be done in accordance with the international region in which the textiles
are used. Suitable machines, washing products (detergents) and additives are customary.
wash cycle. It has, however, to be considered that different equipment may lead to different results.
• Record the weight. Consequently the involved parties have to agree upon the parameters applied.”
18-C.1 General
NOTE: Run the last drying cycle until the down feels
completely dry.
The laundry durability test demonstrates if a treatment
will come off after washing and drying. This also
shows any effects on performance of the DWR down 18-C.5 Results
after washing.
The IDFB Testing Regulations Part 18-C, “Laundry
18-C.2 Equipment Durability” has no specific results or reported values.
a) Home Laundry Machine (e.g. AATCC Standard) 1) a) Once the wash cycle is completed, any other down
performance test can be completed, such as fill
b) Home Drying Machine (e.g. AATCC Standard) 1) power (IDFB Part 10-B), hydrophobic shake test,
(IDFB Part 18-A), etc.
c) Liquid laundry detergent
e.g. Woolite, Tide, etc. (no bleach) For example, testing the fill power before and
after the wash cycles illustrates any effects of
d) Circular shaped pillow (to avoid square edges) the treatment on fill power retention after
100% cotton fabric washing.
230-300 threadcount
20 inch diameter b) All other DWR tests can be repeated after washing
in order to evaluate the hydrophobic properties
18-C.3 Sample Preparation after wash and the durability of the DWR
treatment. The results of these tests demonstrate if
a) Prepare the pillows by cutting out two 20 inch the treatment comes off in the wash process.
diameter circular shapes of cotton fabric for each
pillow and sewing them to form a pillow shell. c) Report the brand or type of laundry detergent that
Leave a small opening unsewn, and turn the
was used for the wash processes.
pillow inside out.
b) Weigh 50 grams for both the treated and untreated
down samples and place in respective pillows. ---------
c) Sew the pillows completely shut.
18-C.4 Procedure
Such processing is normally not permanent; therefore, IDFB Part 20-B Glue Down Evaluation (Visual and
the value of such enhanced down cluster material is Microfiche Method)
diminished over time.
20-A.1 General
The China Feather and Down Industrial Association
has developed a comprehensive method for
identification of plumage that has been treated with
chemicals to enhance the weight of down clusters.
20-A.2 Procedure
For details on the CFDIA comprehensive method for
identification of glue down, please contact the China
Feather and Down Industrial Association.
1. Scope
5. Apparatus and Materials
1.1. IDFB Part 20 is a compilation of qualitative tests
for identifying glue down treatments in a sample of 5.1. Look and Feel: No equipment is needed for the test.
down and feathers. 5.2. Content Analysis: See test method for Content
Analysis IDFB Part 3.
5.3. Microfiche Evaluation:
2. Summary of the Test Method
5.3.1. Microfiche or microscope (min. 70x)
5.3.2. Glass slides (if microscope is used)
2.1. The sample (minimum 200g) is opened and mixed 5.3.3. Analytical balance (accuracy to 0.1 mg)
properly. Then the proper amount of down is 5.3.4. Forceps or Tweezers
allocated for each test: 5.3.5. Three (3) laboratory beakers (150-200 ml),
• Look and feel (10g), marked "Glue Down", "Non-Glue Down",
• Content analysis (2g), and "Unidentified".
• Microfiche evaluation (0.05g of clean
down clusters after 2nd separation) 6. Test Specimens
The tests are performed and results are analyzed.
6.1. A minimum of two samples should be prepared for
3. Significance and Use each of the tests and evaluations.
• Glue Down
• Normal Down
• Unidentified Down
Testing Variances
3. What does testing variance mean? Q: If a single test report shows a result within the testing
If a filling is known to have exactly 80% down cluster and the variance of a label claim, does this mean that the product
testing variance is ±3%, then the great majority of test results passes the label requirement of a government?
will be between 77% and 83% down cluster.
A: Not necessarily. It depends on the legal government’s label
If 20 tests are completed on down and feathers and the tolerances; these may be either more lenient or more strict
average result of all 20 tests is 62% down cluster (DC), then than the label claim.
the actual DC is very close to 62% and most of the results in
the 20 tests should be between 59% and 65% DC. Q: If a single test report shows a result within the testing
variance of a label claim, does this mean that the product
Normally, the testing variances indicate a confidence level of passes the buyer’s allowance?
95%, meaning that 95% of the test results will fall in the
testing variance range. Therefore, 1 in 20 tests may fall A: Not necessarily. It depends on the buyer’s allowances. The
outside the testing variance range. test results should meet the buyer’s labelling rules and
specifications.
4. What about a single test result?
If a single test results gives a down cluster of 74%, the Q: How can the average of multiple tests be used?
actually filling material might be between 71% and 77%
down content. Why? The single test might be at the highest A: The average of sufficient multiple tests normally reflect the
expected testing variance of a 71% material or it might be at actual value of the product. (The individual tests forming
the lowest expected testing variance of a 77% material. the average will fall within the testing variance).
Multiple samples and/or multiple tests of the filling material
will yield an average result that is very close to the actual
down cluster of the material.
Note: Please note IDFB Annex A as source when listing or referencing this material.
International Annex B
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2013
© Copyright 2013 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 1
Bureau
Fabric Testing and Downproof Testing
1. Fabric Testing
Fabric tests are often performed in conjunction with
down and feather tests.
2. Downproof Testing
Downproof testing involves both the filling material
and the fabric. There are several testing organizations
that provide downproof testing methods. IDFB does
not offer any fabric testing methods. However, IDFB
does recognize the following test methods for
downproofness:
Note: Please note IDFB Annex B as source when listing or referencing this material.
International Part 18-F
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations Version June 2013
Bureau Page 1 of 2
Dry Time
(Air dry)
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Part 18-F
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations Version June 2013
Bureau Page 1 of 2
Dry Time
(Air dry)
18-F.5 Results
a) The final time it takes the sample to reach the
original weight (step F.4.a) is reported.
b) Calculate the average added water weight between
the 4 bags and include the drying curve on a
weight vs. time graph.
• Subtract each recorded weight during the
drying process with the original weight.
c) Plot the graph using the value of added water
weight for each time period.
• Plot all of the points from the untreated and the
treated samples on the same graph in order to
compare the two.
Dry
Time
70
Added
Water
Weight
(grams)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Time
(minutes)
Treated
Down
dried
in
100
minutes.
Untreated
Down
dried
in
320
minutes.
Note: The test report must contain the reference to this part of the IDFB Testing Regulations and/or any modifications to the
terms of these regulations.
International Annex C
Down and Feather IDFB Testing Regulations
Version June 2013
© Copyright 2013 IDFB - All rights reserved Page 1 of 1
Bureau
Evaluation of Treatments Applied to Down and Feathers
Note: Please note IDFB Annex C as source when listing or referencing this material.