Control Charts: An Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. by Edward S.
Smith
Review by: Joseph M. Juran and Mason E. Wescott
Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 43, No. 242 (Jun., 1948), pp. 343-346
Published by: American Statistical Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2280385 .
Accessed: 15/06/2014 20:06
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
                American Statistical Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal
                of the American Statistical Association.
http://www.jstor.org
                              This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:06:56 PM
                                             All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
BOOK REVIEWS                                                                                 343
containedin themanual.At presentthislittlevolume,Time-Series
                                                           Charts,
is stillthebestguideforthosewhowantto drawchartsoftheconventional
type.
ControlCharts: An Introduction
                             to StatisticalQualityControl.EdwardS. Smith
(Professorof Mathematics,Universityof Cincinnati,Cincinnati,Ohio), New
York 18: McGraw-HillBook Co., Inc. (330 West 42nd St.), 1947. Pp. xi, 161.
$3.00. (London, W.C. 2: McGraw-Hill PublishingCo. Ltd. [AldwychHouse,
Aldwych].15s.) Two reviews
                         follow:
                          REVIEW          BY JOSEPH M. JURAN
  Professorof Administrative
                           Engineeringand Chairman of theDepartment
                New York University,New York,N. Y.
HERE is another of the numerous books now emergingto expound the
      use of statisticalmethodsto controlquality of product.
  There is a good discussionof the use of controlchartsforaverages, ranges,
and number or fractionof defectives.Visual aids in the formof charts or
tables are well prepared. The exercisesare well chosen.
  The claim that the book is "a test forthe busy executive" is wishfulthink-
ing. In this work,and forthat matter,in others,thereis little evidence that
the authors have trulygrasped the quality problemsof the industrialexecu-
tive.
  Industry'sproblemhas been and still is to make productto meet specifica-
tions. The statisticalmethods,if they are to be grasped by industry,must be
presentedas a means to the solutionof that problem. The emphasis must, in
the firstinstance, be noton (a) how to achieve controlledprocesses; the em-
phasis must ratherbe on (b) the fact that througha controlledprocess it is
easier to make productsto meet specifications.
  To a statistician, (b) seems only too obvious; ergo the executive should
take (b) for granted, and thus only (a) remains to be learned. The precise
opposite is true. The practical problem is to convince the executive of the
truthof (b). Even afterhe is convinced of (b) he will ordinarilynot be con-
cernedwith (a); instead he will delegate the learningof (a) to another.
   With the exception of the unrealisticfirstchapter ProfessorSmith's book
can well serve as a supplementaltext forundergraduateengineers.
                    REVIEW BY MASON E. WESCOTT
        AssistantProfessorof Mathematics,Northwestern
                                                    University
                           Evanston,Illinois
 PROFESSOR    SMITH has long been a successful teacher of college mathe-
   matics. During and since the war, he has participated as an instructorin
numerous 8- and 10-day intensive training courses in statistical quality
control for industrial people. He has conducted several successful in-plant
trainingcourses and has served as technical advisor forthe installation and
operation of statistical quality control programs. Drawing on this back-
                 This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:06:56 PM
                                All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
344                                               AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
groundof theoreticaland practicalexperience,     he has contributed  Control
Chartsto theMcGraw-HillIndustrialOrganization       and ManagementSeries.
   It has been the author'sintentionto writea text "formenand women
whowishto acquireknowledge     ofthemethodsand chartsofstatisticalqual-
ity control,but who are too busyto have an interestin the mathematical
aspectsof the methods."He believesthat "it is moreimportantthan ever
thateveryoneconcerned     withsuchproduction    (production of goodsofhigh
quality)shouldbe able to makeand read controlcharts."
   Withthe latterpointof view,this revieweris in completeagreement,
but he does notfeelthatsuchunderstanding      can be acquiredwithoutmore
exposureto thingsmathematical     thanthe 'busy executive"generallyfeels
he can or wantsto endure.As a matteroffact,theinnocentreaderwhobe-
ginsProfessor  Smith'sbookexpectantly   hopingto be painlessly initiatedinto
the mysteries  of statisticalqualitycontrol,soon findshimselfface to face
withformulasand expositionthatare prettylikelyto appearfrighteningly
mathematical   to him.That thisis so, shouldnotbe heldagainsttheauthor,
because ProfessorSmithhas verynearlysucceededin keepingto a mini-
mumthe formalaspectsof his subject.Rather,it is convincing         testimony
to thefallacyoftryingto undertakean expository      discussionofa technical
subject,be it evenso simpleas controlcharts,withoutsooneror laterhaving
to use symbolsand languagethat to a greatmanynonprofessional          people
mustseemdecidedlymathematical.
   Chapter1 is probablythebestchapterinthebookfromthepointofview
oftheaudienceto whomthebookis addressed.Here theauthorintroduces
the definitions he proposesto followforsuch conceptsas "control,""qual-
ity,"and "satisfactory   controlof quality,"distinguishes   well betweenin-
spectionforthe purposeof controllingqualityand inspectionwhichmerely
 sortsgood productfrombad, outlinespointedlythe fundamental         roleof a
 controlchartas a criterionfortellingwhento takeactionand whento leave
 well enoughalone, and lists ten benefitsto be expectedfroma properly
 administered  controlchartoperation.One mayverywell take exceptionto
 partsofthedefinitions  given,but on the whole,theyare acceptableforthe
 purposesintended.The statementthat "A production       processis said to be
 producing  goodsof satisfactoryqualityif 99.7 per centoftheitemsare satis-
factoryin quality" is, to this reviewer, the kindof a statementhe would
 rathernotsee usedwiththeemphasisit is madeto carryhere.
    The remaining  chaptersare,forthemostpart,wellorganizedand clearly
 presented.One becomesconsciousofa tendencyto emphasizedetailsrather
 thanto paintthepicturein broadoutline.The lattertreatment        wouldhave
 seemedmoreconsistentwiththe objectiveof "selling"the subjectto an
 audiencewhichis notsupposedto be interested     in details.However,Profes-
 sor Smithis understandably    morethe teacherthan the salesmanin these
 chapters, and as such,he anticipatesand triesto removethementalhazards
 thatexperience  has taughthimblockthestudent'sprogress      in learninghow
 to make and use controlcharts.Certainly,if the readerwill exercisethe
                This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:06:56 PM
                               All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
BOOK REVIEWS                                                                                  345
patienceand intellectualcuriosity     to studythroughthesechapters,working
theproblemsproposedas he goes,he willendup withat leastthemechanical
skillto makea controlchart,and a somewhatbetterthanbowingacquaint-
ance withtheoperationalmeaningofsucha chart.
   In thesechaptersa numberof technicalpointsappearedquestionableto
thisreviewer,    but mostof themare not seriousenoughto warrantdetailed
discussionhere.Threepoints,however,cannotbe ignored.
   a) Thereis an irritating   loosenesswithwhichtheword"normal"is used.
Such phrasesas "normal,symmetrical            distribution," "normalaverage,"
"normaland approximately        symmetrical   frequencydistribution,"    "normal
process"occurrepeatedly      withoutthebenefit    ofany consistently  adheredto
definition;  in fact,withoutany "definition"    at all! Unlessthereaderhas un-
usualinsightor sophistication,     he mayverywellend up withthehappyde-
lusionthateverything      willbe just dandyifonlyit can be describedas "nor-
mal." The wordis simplyoverworked          in the last fourchapterswithoutre-
servingto it thedistinction    it rightfully possessesin statistics.
   b) It is theopinionofthisreviewerthaton pages48-52,and elsewhere            in
subsequentdiscussions,     Professor Smithoverplayshishandin thematterof
testingcontrolagainstproductspecifications.       In thefirstplace,thepractice
ofputting"dangerlimits"(three-sigma         limitsforindividuals)on a chartfor
averagesis questionable,particularly      if the chartis to be keptat the ma-
chine.Exhibitingthe to-be-expected        spreadforindividualson a chartfor
averages  simplyinvitestrouble,becausetheoperatorfindsit hardto under-
standwhyhe mustkeepthepointswithinthenarrower                band set by control
limitsforaverageswhenthe "dangerlimits'are wayout beyondthisband.
    In thesecondplace,thediscussionmanagesto conveytheimpression             (al-
thoughthecontrary      is explicitlystatedon page 52) thattherewillfrequently
be hair-splitting  closenessbetweena 'dangerlimit"and a blueprint         specifi-
cationwhichhas to be resolvedbeforea controlledprocesscan be adjudged
in satisfactory   control.The criteriondescribedis not in error:it simply
overemphasizes     a relativelyunimportant     point. Time mightbetterhave
 beenspentin showinghowto estimatethepercentofproduction              likelyto be
 outoftolerancewhencontrolis notsatisfactory,        and in discussing morefully
 theproblemof balancingthe costof sortingand/orreworkagainstthat of
 makingprocessor specification      changesthatwillyieldcontrolsafelywithin
 acceptableblueprint    tolerancesoncetheoptimumcapabilitiesoftheprocess
 have beendetermined.
    c) The discussionin Chapter4 uses theword'lot" wheretheword"sam-
 ple" wouldordinarily    be preferable. The beginner    readingthischaptermust
 surelyexperience   a senseofconfusion    when,afterdigesting   21 pagesinwhich
 he has had theword"lot" drilledintohimat everystage,he suddenlydis-
 coverson page 106 thata boxfullof beads is a "lot,"but a paddlefullof
 beadsis a "sample,"and thatnowit is thesamplethatis to be inspected100
 per centratherthan the lotas he has previously          been led to expect!Evi-
 dentlytheauthorintendedthischapterto deal withattributeinspection            for
                  This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:06:56 PM
                                 All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
346                                                AMERICAN            STATISTICAL          ASSOCIATION
processcontrolratherthan foracceptancesampling,although,of course,
thetwo are not mutuallyexclusive.But ifinspectionforprocesscontrolis
intended,it would seem more consistentand realisticto characterizea
"day'sproduction"    (whichtheauthorsaysmustbe inspected100percent!)
as a "sample"fromthe cause systemrepresented     by theproduction  stream
thanit is to describetheseitemsas a "lot."
  Furthermore,   it would be entirelypossibleforthe beginnerto get the
impression  fromthischapterthat 100 per centinspection(in the ordinary
sense) is requiredto keep a fractiondefectivechart.Many plantsexercise
verysatisfactory  processcontrolthrough   themaintenanceoffraction  defec-
tive chartsbased on samplesthatare a verylongwayfrombeingwhatthe
averagemanhas in mindwhenhe findshimselfreadingabout 100 per cent
inspection ofa lot.It is thesamplethatis inspected100percent,and it would
be wiserto say so, ratherthanto use languagethatcan be so easilymisin-
terpreted.
  Table II appearsto be potentiallyusefulin simplifying   the calculations
requiredforcontrollimitson p and np charts.Its use is amplyillustrated in
Chapter4.
  The typography    is good; tables,charts,and diagramsare well doneand
legible.The bookis easy on theeyes.Exceptfora fewmissingpunctuation
marks,onlytwo errorswerefound:on page vi, the name shouldbe Paul
Peach,and on page 142,thebarhas beenomittedoverthe R in thethirdline
fromthe top.
  Control  Chartscouldproveusefulas a textfora shorttrainingcourseat an
elementary  level.As a textbookforuntutored   home-study or as a "quickie"
forthecasual readerwhowantsto see theforestbut notthetrees,it is the
opinionofthisreviewer     thatthebookis likelyto provedisappointing.
                                               Federales aux Etats-Unis.
Methods StatistiquesModernes des Administrations
Pierre Thionet. Paris: Hermann & Co. (6 rue de la Sarbonne), 1946, Pp.
117.
                     REvIEW BY W. EDWARDS DEMING
                Adviserin Sampling, Bureau of theBudget
                             Washington
   HIS book is a unique and definitecontributiontoward improvedstatistical
 1 practice,as wellas a delightto read.The authorexhibitsunusualability
in theoryand extraordinary                        He recognizesthe need
                            clarityin presentation.
forproperfieldorganization  in conducting samplesurveys,and appreciates
theneedforreliablefigures  in government administration. The studyofthis
bookhas beena pleasingexperience    forthereviewer.It is interesting
                                                                   to see
howwe areviewedfromacrosstheAtlantic,and gratifying      to findtheessen-
tial pointsofprogress in the UnitedStatesso clearlypointedout. Here,we
are too closeto givea coherentaccountofwhathas beenhappening.More-
                This content downloaded from 62.122.76.45 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:06:56 PM
                               All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions