1 s2.0 S1054139X20305929 Main
1 s2.0 S1054139X20305929 Main
www.jahonline.org
Original article
Article history: Received June 10, 2020; Accepted September 27, 2020
Keywords: COVID-19; Adolescent; Mental health; Mood; Relationships
A B S T R A C T
IMPLICATIONS AND
CONTRIBUTION
Purpose: COVID-19 has disrupted many aspects of adolescents’ lives, yet little data are available
that document their subjective experiences of the pandemic. In a mixed-methods study of U.S.
Adolescents around the
adolescents, we examined (1) adolescents’ perceptions of how their social and emotional lives had U.S. have experienced
changed during COVID-19; and (2) associations between these perceived changes and indices of various challenges with
their mental health, above and beyond their prepandemic mental health status. COVID-19 and social
Methods: Four hundred seven U.S. adolescents (Mage ¼ 15.24, standard deviation ¼ 1.69; 50% distancing. As the
female; 52%, 20% African American, 17% Hispanic/Latinx) completed surveys before (October 2019) situation with COVID-19
and during (April 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. They provided qualitative and quantitative continues to develop,
responses on their experiences with COVID-19 and reports of their mental health. those who wish to support
Results: Adolescents perceived various changes in their relationships with family and friends (e.g., youth can help adoles-
less perceived friend support) during COVID-19. They also perceived increases in negative affect cents maintain friendship
and decreases in positive affect. These perceived social and emotional changes were associated connections, ease family
with elevated depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and loneliness in April 2020, controlling tensions, and regulate
for mental health problems before the pandemic. fluctuations in day-to-day
Conclusions: Our findings sensitize clinicians and scholars to the vulnerabilities (changes in affect.
friendship dynamics), as well as resiliencies (supportive family contexts), presented to U.S.
adolescents during the early months of COVID-19.
Ó 2020 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. All rights reserved.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 in the U.S. had surpassed one million and over 90% of
the novel coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) a global pandemic the population was under some form of “stay-at-home” guidance
[1]. Shortly thereafter, the U.S. declared a national emergency [2]. Within that short period, the pandemic and social distancing
and local and state governments took various measures to slow measures significantly impacted daily life for adolescents,
the spread of the virus. By the end of April, confirmed cases of resulting in school closures, movement to remote learning, re-
strictions on leaving their homes, and the inability to gather with
friends. Although data are now forthcoming regarding the pan-
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
* Address correspondence to: Adam A. Rogers, Ph.D., School of Family Life,
demic’s impact on individuals, including adults’ mental health,
Brigham Young University, JFSB 2086, Provo, UT 84602. [3] adolescents’ own experiences with the pandemic and its
E-mail address: [email protected] (A.A. Rogers). implications for their well-being remain relatively unknown.
1054-139X/Ó 2020 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.039
44 A.A. Rogers et al. / Journal of Adolescent Health 68 (2021) 43e52
COVID-19 will remain a part of life for some time, and social COVID-19 (April 2020). We used a mixed-methods approach,
distancing continues to be among the strongest measures relying on adolescents’ open-ended descriptions of their expe-
available to combat its spread. As governments and institutions riences with COVID-19 and quantitative items regarding
shift in response to the pandemic, the inclusion of adolescent perceived changes in relationship dynamics and mood. This
perspectives is critical for orchestrating safe environments that approach assessed depth and breadth in adolescents’ subjective
remain supportive of adolescent well-being. experiences with COVID-19. Second, we explored whether these
We report results from a longitudinal mixed-methods study perceived changes in relationship dynamics and mood were
of U.S. adolescents that started before and ran during the first associated with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and
months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored adolescents’ loneliness during COVID-19, above and beyond mental health
subjective experiences of how COVID-19 had affected their re- levels prepandemic (October 2019). We hypothesized that ado-
lationships and their mood states. We then examined whether lescents who reported adverse changes in relationship dynamics
these perceptions were associated with their mental health and mood during COVID-19, such as decreased social support or
above and beyond their prepandemic mental health levels. increased negative affect, would report greater depressive
symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and loneliness, above and beyond
COVID-19 as a unique challenge to the adolescent experience prior mental health status.
resided in an area under “stay-at-home” guidance. A large ma- day). Items were averaged such that higher scores indicated
jority (79.1%) were receiving schooling online. Some were being higher levels of anxiety (a1 ¼ .92, a2 ¼ .94). Finally, loneliness was
homeschooled (12.5%), and some had school cancelled (1.7%). assessed using the Three-Item Loneliness Scale [25]. Participants
responded to three items (e.g., “I feel left out”) on a rating scale of
Measures 1 (hardly ever) to 3 (often). Items were averaged such that higher
scores indicated greater loneliness (a1 ¼ .86, a2 ¼ .84).
Open-ended responses regarding experiences with COVID-19. At
T2, adolescents were asked to provide brief open-ended re- Demographic controls. At T1, adolescents reported their sex,
sponses describing their experiences with COVID-19 and social mothers’ education, and racial/ethnic identity. Primary caregivers
distancing. To evoke responses about their relationships, they reported annual household income and adolescent address of
were asked, “Regarding the whole situation with COVID-19 and residence, which was coded for community of residence
social distancing, what has been the hardest thing for you in your (urbanized areas, population 50,000þ; urban clusters, pop.
relationships with your family or friends?” They were given a 25,000e50,000; and rural, pop. less than 25,000) and U.S. Region
follow-up: “Have any of these changes been good for your re- (Northeast, South, Midwest, and West) in accordance with U.S.
lationships with family or friends?” Concerning their mental and Census categorizations (see note in Table 2 for scaling) [20]. For
emotional health, they were asked, “Regarding the whole situa- analysis, dummy codes were created for African American, His-
tion with COVID-19 and social distancing, what has been the panic/Latinx, and Other ethnicities, with white/Caucasian as the
hardest thing for you mentally and emotionally?” In a follow-up reference group. The dummy variable for “Other” included Asian
question, they were asked, “Have any of these changes been good American, American Native, and mixed/other groups because each
for you, mentally or emotionally?” was too small to be treated as an independent group in the analysis.
Dummy codes were also created for urbanized areas and rural
Perceived relationship changes during COVID-19. At T2, adoles- communities, with the larger group of urban clusters used as
cents responded to six questions about how their relationships had reference.
changed during COVID-19, with the stem: “Since COVID-19, have
you noticed more or less of the following?” Three changes in parent Analytic strategy
relationships and friendships were measured: time spent with,
receiving support from, and conflict frequency. These six items Adolescents’ open-ended responses were analyzed with a
were rated on a five-point scale (1 ¼ much less than before, 2 ¼ less grounded theory approach, using inductive analysis rather than
than before, 3 ¼ about the same, 4 ¼ more than before, 5 ¼ much pre-existing theory [26]. The authors read participant responses
more than before) and were treated as single items. and used thematic analysis [27] to identify repeated patterns in the
data. These emergent themes formed the basis of a coding scheme,
Perceived mood changes during COVID-19. At T2, adolescents which was used by the first and third authors to categorize all re-
completed six items regarding mood changes during COVID-19. sponses. Inter-rater reliability was good for the coding process
They were presented with the stem: “Since COVID-19, have you (intraclass correlation ¼ .90), and disagreements were resolved by
felt more or less:” Six descriptors were included to assess posi- discussion among the authors. Once coding was complete, the first
tive and negative mood states that reflect elements of mood and second authors organized themes and codes hierarchically
examined in the affect literature (nervous, irritable, upset, dis- where appropriate (e.g., themes into subthemes) [28].
tressed, excited, happy; see the Positive and Negative Affect Quantitative data were then used to identify descriptive pat-
Schedule [PANAS]) [16,17]. All items were rated on a five-point terns among key variables. To test whether perceived changes in
scale (1 ¼ much less than before, 2 ¼ less than before, relationship dynamics and mood during COVID-19 were associated
3 ¼ about the same, 4 ¼ more than before, 5 ¼ much more than with mental health problems, we conducted separate hierarchical
before). We then averaged the six items into two subscales: linear regression models for depressive symptoms, anxiety symp-
Perceived Changes in Negative Affect (nervous, irritable, upset, toms, and loneliness. In step 1, demographic controls were entered
distressed) and Perceived Changes in Positive Affect (excited, (sex, race/ethnicity, income, mother education, community of
happy). Internal consistency was adequate for Changes in residence). At step 2, the T1 equivalent of the T2 outcome was
Negative Affect (a ¼ .85). The two items for Changes in Positive included as a control (e.g., T1 depressive symptoms were entered in
Affect were highly intercorrelated (r ¼ .70). the model predicting T2 depressive symptoms). Finally, in step 3,
perceived changes in relationship dynamics and mood during
Indices of mental health. At both time points, adolescents re- COVID-19 were entered as predictors. Thus, the model tested the
ported their mental health on three indices. Depressive symp- concurrent associations between perceived COVID-related socio-
toms were measured using the Children’s Depression Inventory emotional changes and their mental health at T2, while controlling
short version [21]. Participants completed 12 items indicating for prior mental health status prepandemic (e.g., T1 depressive
how often they had experienced symptoms in the past 2 weeks symptoms). Analyses were conducted in SPSS, version 26. Because
(e.g., “I feel cranky all the time” and “I am sad”) on a rating scale missing values were minimal (no more than .5% on any variable),
of 1 (rarely or none of the time) to 4 (most of the time). Items the SPSS default for listwise deletion was used.
were averaged such that higher scores indicated more severe
depressive symptoms (a1 ¼ .84, a2 ¼ .87). Anxiety symptoms Results
were measured using the seven-item Generalized Anxiety Dis-
order Scale [22], which has been shown to produce valid scores Open-ended responses regarding experiences with COVID-19
among adolescent respondents [23,24]. Participants rated their
symptoms over the past 7 days (e.g., “feeling nervous, anxious, or Several themes emerged among adolescents’ open-ended
on edge”) on a 4-point rating scale (1 ¼ never, 4 ¼ nearly every responses, indicating both negative and positive subjective
46 A.A. Rogers et al. / Journal of Adolescent Health 68 (2021) 43e52
Table 1
Themes and example quotes from open-ended responses about experiences with COVID-19
“Regarding the situation with COVID-19 and social distancing, what has been the hardest thing for you mentally and emotionally/for your relationships with family
and friends?”
Table 1
Continued
“Regarding the situation with COVID-19 and social distancing, what has been the hardest thing for you mentally and emotionally/for your relationships with family
and friends?”
n ¼ 47 COVID-Related Angst
“I'm worrying about my parents and grandparents getting Covid-19. Will they survive it? I'm afraid to hug my parents and grandparents. I could have
it and be asymptomatic.” (African American male, 15)
“Worry that I might catch and give it to my mom. She has 3 different auto-immunes.” (white female, 15)
“A few of my family members got sick and I thought they were going to die.” (African American female, 14)
“I'm scared of getting the virus.” (white male, 15)
“I feel helpless because so many people are getting sick.” (Asian American female, 16)
“I feel so helpless that we cannot do anything about it” (Asian American male, 15)
“I feel like after all this happens, I won’t look at things the same way” (Hispanic male, 16)
“Just keeping calm from everything I hear on TV about COVID-19” (white male, 16)
“I worry about what's gonna happen to our economy” (white female, 16)
“This makes me sad, it is difficult to understand what is happening it's like we are part of a horror movie.” (Hispanic female, 15)
“I'm nervous and sometimes I don’t know how to deal with it. My family doesn’t know how to deal with it either.” (Hispanic female, 14)
“I cannot go to my great grandma's house (she is 87). Everyone is worried about germs with her.” (white female, 14)
n ¼ 28 In a Funk
“I don’t feel like doing anything and I miss my friends.” (Hispanic male, 15)
“Being able to stay happy and find reasons to get out of bed. Life has gotten very boring.” (white female, 14)
“I sleep too much and have no schedule.” (white female, 15)
“Having too much empty time at home.” (white female, 14)
“I feel sad and bored.” (Hispanic male, 15)
“Makes me lonely and depressed.” (African American/white female, 16)
“Little harder to get through the day.” (white female, 15)
n ¼ 20 School Stress
“Being able to get all of my daily school work done on time, it's mentally draining me.” (white female, 14)
“Trying to focus on school work while worrying about staying safe.” (African American male, 17)
“Stressing over my grades staying up” (white male, 14)
n ¼ 13 No Difficulties
“Nothing comes to mind.” (African American male, 17)
“Honestly, nothing.” (white female, 17)
“Have any of these changes been good for you mentally and emotionally/for your relationships with family or friends?”
Table 1
Continued
“Have any of these changes been good for you mentally and emotionally/for your relationships with family or friends?”
n ¼ 19 Improved Friendships
“It has been good for our friendships that we can now talk about more personal things going on, such as how we are impacted by covid-19.” (white
female, 14)
“Some changes have been good because I don’t hang around people that's not good for me.” (African American female, 16)
“I now know who my best friends are because we try to connect daily.” (African American male, 15)
“Makes me appreciate my friends more.” (Hispanic female, 15)
experiences with COVID-19. We summarize these themes and parents and grandparents. I could have it and be asymptomatic”
refer the reader to Table 1 for more examples of each. (African American male, 15). Adolescents also felt confused and
helpless about the current state of the world in general and its
future. One stated, “This makes me sad; it is difficult to understand
Challenges of COVID-19 what is happening it’s like we are part of a horror movie” (Hispanic
female, 15). Another expressed, “I feel so helpless that we cannot
Less In-Person Interaction (n ¼ 309): Many adolescents do anything about it” (Asian American male, 15).
identified the inability to physically gather with others as “In a Funk” (n ¼ 28): Another group reported emotional dif-
distinctly challenging. This typically referred to friends and ficulties and struggled to get going, as if they were “in a funk.”
romantic partners, but occasionally also included extended and They said that the lack of routine was challenging and led to
nonresidential family members. One adolescent stated, “The feelings of lethargy and sadness. In describing the most chal-
hardest thing is not having my friends around I don’t feel normal lenging thing for her, one adolescent said, “I sleep too much and
anymore” (African American female, age 16). Another said, “My have no schedule” (white female, 15). Another stated, “I don’t feel
mom was no longer able to take a flight to my state to visit me” like doing anything.” (Hispanic male, 15).
(Native American female, 17). These adolescents expressed a School Stress (n ¼ 20): The shift to online, remote learning
desire for emotional connection and social support. One created mental and emotional strain for others. One participant
adolescent expressed, “With my friends, no one talks to me noted that “Being able to get all of my daily schoolwork done on
anymore” (Hispanic male, 14). Digital means of connecting with time is mentally draining me” (white female, 14).
friends (e.g., face-time, online gaming) were often said to be
insufficient (e.g., “All my friends are still in touch on social media
but it sucks not being able to go get a burger or something” [African Positives of COVID-19
American male, 15]). Some felt they lacked an emotional outlet.
“Being away from my relationship and my friends [is hard]. Being There are no positives (n ¼ 169): In response to being asked if
with them helped me relax and calm down. It was my break,” one there were any positives about these changes, either emotionally
adolescent remarked (African American female, 14). or relationally, many reported that there were none (e.g., “no” or
Not Getting Out (n ¼ 117): Some adolescents were frustrated by “not at all”).
the inability to get out of the house. This included the inability to More Time with Family (n ¼ 91): Some reported positives in
socialize in outdoor settings with friends and family (e.g., “Staying the increased time with family. Being able to spend more time
inside, my mom only goes out for only absolutely needed things, I have with parents and siblings was enjoyable and a source of social
not been anywhere since March 10” [white female, 14]); the inability support. “I still have my mom and dad here with me. My dad still
to participate in activities that were important to them, such as helps me work on my baseball skills,” one adolescent said (His-
sports, choir, school plays, and prom (“Not being able to play in my panic male, 14). For these adolescents, the time together also
basketball team, this makes me really angry, sad, and depressed” resulted in improvements to their relationships, including more
[Hispanic female, 15]); and feeling cooped up, restless, and bored closeness and discovering new things about each other.
(e.g., “Sitting in the house all day and not really talking. My mom sleeps More Time for Myself (n ¼ 40): Other adolescents enjoyed the
and my dad tinkers in the basement” [African American male, 15]). increased personal time. Having this extra time helped them
Too Much Family Time (n ¼ 81): Some adolescents reported slow down, relax, and achieve more clarity (e.g., “I have been able
difficulties arising from increased time with their families, noting to focus more on self-care which is good for my physical and mental
particularly the lack of privacy and personal space. One partici- health” [white female, 14] and “It’s giving me more time to medi-
pant expressed, “To actually get private time relaxing in my room is tate and clear my mind of things” [African American male, 15]).
hard. Everyone is home so there’s always noise and someone Others appreciated having more time for solitary activities (e.g.,
knocking at my door” (white female, 14). For some, this led to “I am able to exercise more” [Asian American male, 14]).
increased irritation with one another and caused tension and Improved Friendships (n ¼ 19): A subgroup said that COVID-
conflict. One participant described, “I spent time with my mom a 19 and social distancing had led to improvements in their
lot before, now we’re both so stressed and agitated that it’s putting a friendships, often by proving these relationships (e.g., “I feel like I
strain on our relationship” (white male, 17). have found who my real friends are because they make an effort to
COVID-Related Angst (n ¼ 47): Some adolescents expressed text me every day” [white female, 15]).
fear and anxiety surrounding the virus. They expressed concerns
about their own and their family’s safety, and specifically the Quantitative results
possibility they could spread the virus to a loved one. One
participant stated, “I’m worrying about my parents and grand- Means and standard deviations for all continuous study vari-
parents getting Covid-19. Will they survive it? I’m afraid to hug my ables are presented in Table 2. On average, adolescents reported
A.A. Rogers et al. / Journal of Adolescent Health 68 (2021) 43e52 49
Table 2 COVID-19. They spent far more time with their families and
Means and standard deviations for continuous study variables at both time- reported overall increases in family support with a slight
points
decrease in family conflict. They also spent far less time with
Time 1 Time 2 friends and reported decreases in conflicts/disagreements with
Mean (SD) SD Range Mean SD Range friends and slight overall decreases in friend support. Concerning
Depress. symptoms 1.75 .52 1.00e3.58 1.84 .56 1.00e3.75 mood changes, the majority of adolescents reported increases in
Anxiety symptoms 1.64 .77 1.00e4.00 1.85 .79 1.00e4.00 negative affect and decreases in positive affect during COVID-19
Loneliness 1.30 .47 1.00e3.00 1.44 .53 1.00e3.00 (histograms and response counts for each item are available in
NA – – – 3.24 .80 1.00e5.00 Figures 1 and 2 in the online Supplemental Material).
PA – – – 2.52 .81 1.00e5.00
We then examined whether these perceived socio-emotional
Time - parents – – – 4.41 .85 1.00e5.00
Sup e parents – – – 3.87 .87 1.00e5.00 changes during COVID-19 varied according to background char-
Con e parents – – – 2.76 1.00 1.00e5.00 acteristics for sex, ethnicity, community of residence, U.S. region,
Time e friends – – – 1.43 .91 1.00e5.00 family income, and mothers’ education. One-way analysis of
Sup e friends – – – 2.92 .92 1.00e5.00
variances showed a few significant differences across these traits
Con e friends – – – 2.38 .94 1.00e5.00
Income 2.65 .83 1e4 – – – (see Table 2 in online Supplemental Material for full results).
Mother education 4.64 1.53 1e11 – – – Girls perceived greater increases in friend conflict than boys
during COVID-19. White adolescents perceived greater increases
“–” indicates the variable was not included at that time point. Perceived Changes
in: NA ¼ Negative Affect; PA ¼ Positive Affect; Time ¼ Time spent with; in family conflict than Latinx adolescents and less family support
Sup ¼ support; Con ¼ conflict. There were significant mean level increases in than African American adolescents. Adolescents from urban
depressive symptoms (d ¼ .19), anxiety symptoms (d ¼ .27), and loneliness communities perceived more pronounced declines in positive
(d ¼ .28) between time 1 and time 2. Demographic background characteristics affect and greater time spent with family than adolescents
were coded as follows: sex (1 ¼ male, 2 ¼ female); mother education (1 ¼ no
formal schooling, 2 ¼ less than high school, 3 ¼ high school/GED, 4 ¼ some
residing in rural communities. We also examined zero-order
college, 5 ¼ 2-year college degree, 6 ¼ 4-year college degree, 7 ¼ master's degree, correlations with indicators of socio-economic status. Adoles-
8 ¼ doctoral degree, 9 ¼ professional degree), family income (1 ¼ less than cents from lower income households perceived greater increases
$20,000; 2 ¼ $20,000e$35,000; 3 ¼ $35,000e$50,000; 4 ¼ $50,000e$75,000; in negative affect and more pronounced decreases in positive
5 ¼ $75,000e$100,000; 6 ¼ $100,000e$150,000; 7 ¼ $150,000e$200,000,
affect. They also perceived greater conflict with parents and less
8 ¼ $200,000 or more); race/ethnicity (1 ¼ African American, 2 ¼ Asian American
or Pacific Islander, 3 ¼ Hispanic or Latinx, 4 ¼ Caucasian or white, 5 ¼ Native support from friends during COVID-19 (see Table 3 for correla-
American, 6 ¼ Mixed or Biracial); community type (1 ¼ Urbanized Area, tions). There were no differences in COVID-19 perceptions across
2 ¼ Urban Center, 3 ¼ Rural). geographic region.
low levels of mental health problems at T1, which were relatively Perceived changes during COVID-19 and associations with mental
stable over time, although paired samples t-tests revealed health. We then examined whether perceived changes in
small significant increases in depressive symptoms (t(406) ¼ 3.88, relationship dynamics and mood during COVID-19 were
p < .001; Cohen’s d ¼ .19), anxiety symptoms (t(406) ¼ 5.92, uniquely associated with mental health problems above and
p < .001; Cohen’s d ¼ .28), and loneliness (t(406) ¼ 5.52, p < .001; beyond mental health status prepandemic, as well as back-
Cohen’s d ¼ .27) from October 2019 to April 2020. Correlations ground characteristics for sex, race/ethnicity, family income,
among study variables are presented in Table 3. mother education level, and community of residence. Full results
of these models are presented in Table 4.
Perceived changes in relationship dynamics and mood. Adoles- In the hierarchical regressions for depressive symptoms at time
cents perceived various changes to their relationships during 2, demographic background characteristics (step 1) were generally
Table 3
Correlations among key study variables
Zero-order correlations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1. T1 Depression –
2. T2 Depression .69*** –
3. T1 Anxiety .70*** .57*** –
4. T2 Anxiety .47*** .66*** .56*** –
5. T1 Loneliness .69*** .54*** .71*** .42*** –
6. T2 Loneliness .50*** .64*** .50*** .62*** .53*** –
7. NA .06 .27*** .14** .44*** .10* .25*** –
8. PA .10* .24*** .09þ .34*** .08 .20*** .55*** –
9. Time e parents .13** .14** .02 .02 .05 .04 .09þ .03 –
10. Sup e parents .13** .11** .01 .03 .09þ .09þ .09þ .02 .31*** –
11. Con e parents .20*** .32** .19*** .20*** .15** .27*** .17*** .08 .07 .19*** –
12. Time efriends .03 .07 .01 .01 .01 .09þ .07 .11* .24*** .09þ .09þ –
13. Sup e friends .12** .20*** .10* .07 .19*** .20*** .11* .13* .02 .15*** .13** .23*** –
14. Con - friends .08 .11* .05 .11* .03 .03 .07 .10* .18*** .14** .25*** .29*** .08þ –
15. Income .28** .22*** .28*** .23*** .23*** .14** .12** .12* .06 .04 .12* .03 .13** .06 –
16. Mother Ed. .01 .08 .04 .04 .04 .01 .03 .04 .05 .01 .04 .02 .03 .12* .23*** –
Perceived Changes in: NA ¼ negative affect; PA ¼ positive affect; Time ¼ Time spent with; Sup ¼ support; Con ¼ conflict.
***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05, þp < .10.
50 A.A. Rogers et al. / Journal of Adolescent Health 68 (2021) 43e52
Table 4
Results of hierarchical multiple regression models predicting mental and emotional health indices from perceived changes during COVID-19
b SE B b SE b b SE b
Step 1- Demographics
Sex .01 .04 .01 .04 .06 .03 .01 .04 .01
Race - African American .02 .05 .02 .11 .08 .06 .05 .06 .04
Race - Hispanic/Latinx .05 .05 .03 .10 .09 .06 .17 .06 .12*
Race e Other .11 .06 .06þ .13 .10 .05 .06 .07 .03
Community e Urban Area .01 .05 .01 .04 .08 .02 .01 .06 .01
Community e Rural .06 .06 .03 .01 .10 .01 .05 .07 .03
Income .01 .01 .03 .02 .02 .04 .02 .01 .06
Parent Education .03 .01 .08* .01 .02 .03 .01 .02 .01
R2¼ .04; F change in R2 ¼ 1.90ns R2¼ .03; F change in R2 ¼ 1.67ns R2¼ .02; F change in R2 ¼ .87ns
Step 2 - Predictors
Time 1 Mental health .69 .04 .64*** .56 .04 .50*** .55 .05 .49***
R2¼ .49; F change in R2 ¼ 42.18*** R2¼ .33; F change in R2 ¼ 21.71*** R2¼ .30; F change in R2 ¼ 18.61***
Step 3 - COVID responses
Perceived change in NA .13 .03 .18*** .28 .05 .28*** .09 .03 .13**
Perceived change in PA .05 .03 .07þ .14 .04 .14** .04 .03 .06
Perceived change in time .04 .02 .06 .05 .04 .05 .02 .03 .03
w/ family
Perceived change in .01 .02 .02 .02 .04 .03 .02 .03 .03
support-family
Perceived change in .07 .02 .13*** .03 .03 .04 .09 .02 .17***
conflict-family
Perceived change in time .04 .02 .06þ .01 .04 .01 .05 .02 .09*
w/ friends
Perceived change in .05 .02 .09* .02 .03 .03 .03 .03 .04
support-friends
þ
Perceived change in .01 .02 .01 .06 .04 .07 .01 .03 .01
conflict-friends
R2¼ .58; F change in R2 ¼ 31.14*** R2¼ .48; F change in R2 ¼ 20.73*** R2¼ .38; F change in R2 ¼ 13.61***
Time 1 Mental Health ¼ respective mental health indicator at T1; Dummy variables were created for African American (0 ¼ not African American, 1 ¼ African American),
Hispanic/Latinx (0 ¼ not Hispanic/Latinx, 1 ¼ Hispanic/Latinx), and Other (1 ¼ Asian-American, Native American, Other). Dummy variables were also created for Urban
Area (0 ¼ not Urban Area, 1 ¼ Urban Area) and Rural community (0 ¼ not rural, 1 ¼ rural).
***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05, þp < .10.
nonsignificant predictors of variance. The exception was a negative affect and conflict with friends were positively associated with
association with mothers’ education, such that adolescents whose anxiety at T2; perceived changes in positive affect were nega-
mothers had more formal education reported lower depressive tively associated with anxiety at T2. Adolescents who perceived
symptoms at T2. The addition of T1 depressive symptoms (step 2) more pronounced increases in negative affect and conflict with
accounted for a significant increase in variance explained friends during COVID-19, as well as those who perceived more
(DR2 ¼ .46, p < .001) and was the strongest indicator of adolescents’ pronounced decreases in positive affect, reported greater anxiety
depressive symptoms 6 months later. Regarding our main hy- symptoms in April 2020. These associations accounted for
potheses (step 3), adolescents’ perceived changes in relationship additional variance above and beyond anxiety symptoms at T1
dynamics and mood during COVID-19 accounted for additional (DR2 ¼ .15, p < .001).
variance explained (DR2 ¼ .09, p < .001), with several significant Loneliness at time two was unassociated with most de-
relations emerging. Specifically, perceived changes in negative mographic controls (step 1), except for a positive association
affect and conflict with family were positively associated with T2 with the dummy code for Hispanic/Latinx. Hispanic/Latinx youth
depressive symptoms. Perceived changes in friend support were reported higher levels of loneliness than white youth at T2. The
negatively associated with depressive symptoms. Interpreted, addition of T1 loneliness to the model (step 2) accounted for
adolescents who perceived greater increases in negative affect and additional variance explained (DR2 ¼ .29, p < .001) and showed
family conflict during COVID-19 reported higher depressive that loneliness at T1 was the strongest indicator of loneliness
symptoms in April 2020. Adolescents who perceived more 6 months later. Regarding the hypothesized relations (step 3),
pronounced decreases in friend support during COVID-19 also loneliness at T2 was positively associated with perceived changes
reported higher depressive symptoms in April 2020. These asso- in negative affect and family conflict and negatively associated
ciations were above and beyond their self-reported depressive with perceived change in time spent with friends. Adolescents
symptoms in October 2019, prior to the pandemic. who perceived more pronounced increases in negative affect and
Anxiety symptoms at time 2 were unassociated with any of family conflict and more pronounced decreases in time with
the demographic controls (step 1). The inclusion of T1 anxiety friends during COVID-19 reported higher levels of loneliness in
symptoms (step 2) accounted for additional variance explained April 2020, above and beyond their loneliness levels in October
(DR2 ¼ .30, p < .001) and showed that anxiety at T1 was the 2019. The inclusions of these variables accounted for additional
strongest indicator of anxiety symptoms at T2. Regarding the variance explained (DR2 ¼ .08, p < .001), above and beyond
hypothesized relations (step 3), perceived changes in negative loneliness at T1.
A.A. Rogers et al. / Journal of Adolescent Health 68 (2021) 43e52 51
Conclusion [11] Adams R, Laursen B. The organization and dynamics of adolescent conflict
with parents and friends. J Marriage Fam 2001;63:97e110.
[12] Ha T, Otten R, McGill S, et al. The family and peer origins of coercion within
COVID-19 is anticipated to stay with us for some time. Despite adult romantic relationships: A longitudinal multimethod study across
many unknowns in the near and intermediate future, including relationships contexts. Dev Psychol 2019;55:207e15.
plans for schools, fluctuating rates of infection, and potential [13] Seidman E, French SE. Developmental trajectories and ecological transi-
tions: A two-step procedure to aid in the choice of prevention and pro-
additional lockdowns, the pandemic will undoubtedly continue to motion interventions. Dev Psychopathol 2004;16:1141e59.
impact adolescents’ lives. Adolescents in this study experienced [14] Gutman LM, Eccles JS. Stage-environment fit during adolescence: Trajec-
social and emotional difficulties directly due to the pandemic, and tories of family relations and adolescent outcomes. Dev Psychol 2007;43:
522e37.
these were uniquely associated with their self-reported mental [15] Bailen NH, Green LM, Thompson RJ. Understanding emotion in adoles-
health problems. We encourage continuing scholarly and clinical cents: A review of emotional frequency, intensity, instability, and clarity.
work that can help promote resiliencies and buffer against Emot Rev 2019;11:63e73.
[16] Olino TM, Lopez-Duran NL, Kovacs M, et al. Developmental trajectories of
vulnerabilities during this unprecedented time. positive and negative affect in children at high and low familial risk for
depressive disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2011;52:792e9.
[17] Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief
Funding Sources measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc
Psychol 1988;54:1063.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding [18] Crawford JR, Henry JD. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS):
Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large
agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2004;43:245e65.
[19] Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental
disorders in US adolescents: Results from the national comorbidity survey
Supplementary Data
replicationeadolescent supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Psychiatry
2010;49:980e9.
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at [20] Census.gov. Popclock data tables. WHO timeline - COVID-19. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.039. https://www.census.gov/popclock/data_tables.php?component¼growth.
Accessed June 4, 2020.
[21] Allgaier AK, Frühe B, Pietsch K, et al. Is the children’s depression inventory
References short version a valid screening tool in pediatric care? A comparison to its
full-length version. J Psychosom Res 2012;73:369e74.
[22] Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. A brief measure for assessing
[1] World Health Organization. WHO timeline - COVID-19. 2020. Available at: generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:
https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/27-04-2020-who-timeline—covid-19.
1092e7.
Accessed May 20, 2020. [23] Mossman SA, Luft MJ, Schroeder HK, et al. The generalized anxiety disorder
[2] Gearan A, Sonmez F. Covid-19 cases top 1 million in the United States, about
7-item (GAD-7) scale in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder:
a third of known cases worldwide. Washington Post. 2020. Available at: Signal detection and validation. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2017;29:227.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/covid-19-cases-top-1-million-in- [24] Tiirikainen K, Haravuori H, Ranta K, et al. Psychometric properties of the 7-
the-united-states-about-a-third-of-known-cases-worldwide/2020/04/28/e5
item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7) in a large representative
fafd4e-8944-11ea-9dfd-990f9dcc71fc_story.html. Accessed May 20, 2020. sample of Finnish adolescents. Psychiatry Res 2019;272:30e5.
[3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention e National Center for Health
[25] Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, et al. A short scale for measuring
Statistics. Household Pulse survey: indicators of anxiety and depression loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Res
based on reported frequency of symptoms during last 7 days. Available at: Aging 2004;26:655e72.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/pulse/mental-health.htm. Accessed
[26] Glaser BG. Theoretical sensitivity. Hanover, NH: Sociological Press; 1978.
May 20, 2020.
[27] Braun V, Clark V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol
[4] Brechwald WA, Prinstein MJ. Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in
2006;3:77e101.
understanding peer influence processes. J Res Adolesc 2011;21:166e79.
[28] Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. 3rd
[5] Nickerson AB, Nagle RJ. Parent and peer attachment in late childhood and
ed. Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi: Sage; 2012.
early adolescence. J Early Adolesc 2005;25:223e49.
[6] Keijsers L, Poulin F. Developmental changes in parentechild communica- [29] Ha T, Van Roekel E, Iida M, et al. Depressive symptoms amplify emotional
tion throughout adolescence. Dev Psychol 2013;49:2301. reactivity to daily perceptions of peer rejection in adolescence. J Youth
[7] Rogers AA, Padilla-Walker LM, McLean RD, et al. Trajectories of perceived Adolesc 2019;48:2152e64.
parental psychological control across adolescence and implications for the [30] Rogers AA, Memmott-Elison MK, Padilla-Walker, Byon J. Perceived
development of depressive and anxiety symptoms. J Youth Adolesc 2020; parental psychological control predicts intraindividual decrements in self-
49:136e49. regulation throughout adolescence. Dev Psychol 2019;55:2352e64.
[8] Laursen B, Coy KC, Collins WA. Reconsidering changes in parent- [31] Hammen C. Stress generation in depression: Reflections on origins,
child conflict across adolescence: A meta-analysis. Child Dev 1998; research, and future directions. J Clin Psychol 2006;62:1065e82.
69:817e32. [32] Rueger SY, Malecki CK, Pyun Y, et al. A meta-analytic review of the asso-
[9] Whiteman SD, McHale SM, Crouter AC. Family relationships from adoles- ciation between perceived social support and depression in childhood and
cence to early adulthood: Changes in the family system following first- adolescence. Psychol Bull 2016;142:1017e2364.
borns’ leaving home. J Res Adolesc 2011;21:461e74. [33] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention e Coronavirus Disease 2019
[10] Crosnoe R, Cavanagh S, Elder GH Jr. Adolescent friendships as academic (COVID-19). COVID-19 in racial and ethnic minority groups. Available at:
resources: The intersection of friendship, race, and school disadvantage. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/
Sociol Perspect 2003;46:331e52. racial-ethnic-minorities.html. Accessed July 10, 2020.