Water and Wastewater Engineering: Design Principles and Practice Second Edition Mackenzie L. Davis - Ebook PDF Download
Water and Wastewater Engineering: Design Principles and Practice Second Edition Mackenzie L. Davis - Ebook PDF Download
https://ebooksecure.com/download/water-and-wastewater-
engineering-design-principles-and-practice-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/ise-introduction-to-
environmental-engineering-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/uv-visible-spectrophotometry-of-
water-and-wastewater-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/electrochemical-water-and-
wastewater-treatment-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/modular-treatment-approach-for-
drinking-water-and-wastewater-ebook-pdf/
Communications Receivers: Principles and Design, 4th
Edition Ulrich L. Rohde - eBook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/communications-receivers-
principles-and-design-4th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/principles-and-practice-of-
modern-chromatographics-methods-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/principles-and-practice-of-big-
data-second-edition-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-water-rescue-principles-
and-practice-to-nfpa-1006-and-1670-surface-swiftwater-dive-ice-
surf-and-flood-2nd-edition/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/water-conservation-and-
wastewater-treatment-in-brics-nations-technologies-challenges-
strategies-and-policies-ebook-pdf/
WATER AND
WASTEWATER
ENGINEERING
WATER AND
WASTEWATER
ENGINEERING
SECOND EDITION
ISBN: 978-1-26-013228-1
MHID: 1-26-013228-5
The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-1-26-013227-4,
MHID: 1-26-013227-7.
All trademarks are trademarks oftheir respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trade-
marked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit ofthe trademark owner, with no intention ofinfringe-
ment of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps.
McGraw-Hill Education eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions or for use in
corporate training programs. To contact a representative, please visit the Contact Us page at www.mhprofessional.com.
Information contained in this work has been obtained by McGraw-Hill Education from sources believed to be reliable. However,
neither McGraw-Hill Education nor its authors guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information published herein, and
neither McGraw-Hill Education nor its authors shall be responsible for any errors, omissions, or damages arising out of use of
this information. This work is published with the understanding that McGraw-Hill Education and its authors are supplying infor-
mation but are not attempting to render engineering or other professional services. If such services are required, the assistance of
an appropriate professional should be sought
TERMS OF USE
This is a copyrighted work and McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work
is subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the
work, you may not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit,
distribute, disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it without McGraw-Hill Education's prior consent. You
may use the work for your own noncommercial and personal use; any other use of the work is strictly prohibited. Your right to
use the work may be terminated if you fail to comply with these terms.
THE WORK IS PROVIDED "AS IS." McGRAW-HILL EDUCATION AND ITS LICENSORS MAKE NO GUARANTEES
OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE ACCURACY, ADEQUACY OR COMPLETENESS OF OR RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED
FROM USING THE WORK, INCLUDING ANY INFORMATION TIIAT CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE WORK
VIA HYPERLINK OR OTHERWISE, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN-
CLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FORA PARTICU-
LAR PURPOSE. McGraw-Hill Education and its licensors do not warrant or guarantee that the functions contained in the work
will meet your requirements or that its operation will be uninterrupted or error free. Neither McGraw-Hill Education nor its
licensors shall be liable to you or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error or omission, regardless of cause, in the work or for any
damages resulting therefrom. McGraw-Hill Education has no responsibility for the content of any information accessed through
the work. Under no circumstances shall McGraw-Hill Education and/or its licensors be liable for any indirect, incidental, special,
punitive, consequential or similar damages that result from the use of or inability to use the work, even if any of them has been
advised of the possibility of such damages. This limitation of liability shall apply to any claim or cause whatsoever whether such
claim or cause arises in contract, tort or otherwise.
Dedication
To Elaine, my wife and love forever!
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Preface xix
Professional Advisory Board for the Second Edition xxili
Professional Advisory Board for the First Edition xxv
3 Intake Structures 75
3-1 Introduction 76
3-2 Design Elements 76
3-3 Design Criteria 82
3-4 Operational Considerations 105
3-5 Operation and Maintenance 108
3-6 Chapter Review 109
3-7 Problems 110
3-8 Discussion Questions 115
3-9 References 115
ix
x CONTENTS
4 Wells 117
4-1 Introduction 118
4-2 Design Elements 118
4-3 Well Protection 119
4-4 Well Design 131
4-5 Chapter Review 157
4-6 Problems 158
4-7 Discussion Questions 167
4-8 References 167
10 Sedimentation 355
10-1 Introduction 356
10-2 Sedimentation Theory 356
10-3 Sedimentation Practice 374
10-4 Sedimentation Basin Design 379
10-5 Operation and Maintenance 392
10-6 Chapter Review 393
10-7 Problems 394
10-8 Discussion Questions 398
10-9 References 398
Appendix A 1255
Properties of Air, Water, and Selected Chemicals
Appendix B 1265
U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes
Appendix C 1267
Pipe, Fitting, and Valve Data
Appendix D 1275
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ct Values for Disinfectants
Index 1285
PREFACE
This book is designed for use by professionals. The book covers the design of municipal water
and wastewater facilities. I have assumed that the reader has had an introductory environ-
mental engineering course and a first course in fluid mechanics. That is, I have assumed the
reader is familiar with notation such as mg/Land acronyms such as BOD as well as the con-
cepts of mass balance, Bernoulli's equation, and friction loss. Because I could not assume
that the reader has used either Introduction to Environmental Engineering or Principles of
Environmental Engineering and Science, some material from those texts is used to introduce
the subject matter included here.
A Professional Advisory Board has provided its experience and expertise to vet the material
in Water and Wastewater Engineering. The Board is composed of licensed engineers, a licensed
geologist, and licensed treatment plant operators. A short biographical sketch and affiliation for
each Board member is presented following this Preface. The Board members have read and com-
mented on all of the chapters. In addition, a number of operators have been interviewed to obtain
hints on methods for improving designs.
The book format is one that I used successfully over the 20 years that I taught the material.
The book starts with an overview of the design and construction process including the application
of the code of ethics in the process. The first half of the book addresses water treatment. Because
my course was built around a term design project, the subject matter follows the flow of water
through the unit processes of coagulation, flocculation, softening (including NF and RO), sedi-
mentation, filtration (including MF and UP), disinfection, and residuals management.
The topics of wastewater treatment follow a similar pattern of following the flow through a
plant, that is, preliminary treatment, primary treatment, secondary treatment, tertiary treatment,
and residuals management. Special attention is given to the application of membranes.
Each subject in each chapter is introduced with a discussion of the theoretical principles that
are to be applied in the design of the unit process. In addition, in each chapter, appropriate design
criteria from the Great Lakes-Upper Mississippi River Board of State and Provincial Public Health
and Environmental Managers (known to the elders of the profession as the Ten State Standards)
as well as alternative approaches from the literature are addressed.
The text features over 100 example problems, 500 end-of-chapter problems, and 300 illus-
trations. A highlight of the book is the inclusion of safety issues in the design requirements as
well as operation and maintenance activities. ''Hints from the Field" bring real-life experience to
solving technical issues.
For those using this book for a formal university-level course, an instructor's manual is avail-
able online for qualified instructors. Please inquire with your McGraw-Hill representative for
the necessary access password. The instructor's manual includes sample course outlines for both
a one-semester option and a two-semester option, solved example exams, and detailed solutions
to the end-of-chapter problems. In addition, there are suggestions for using the pedagogic aids
in the text.
xix
XX PREFACE
Mackenzie L Davis
Acknowledgments
The following individuals provided opportunities for photographs, insight on current design prac-
tice, operational problems, and hints from the field:
John Allen, Plant Superintendent, Grand Rapids Water Filtration Plant
Tom Arlington, Project Manager, United Water, Armada WWTP
Michael P. Avrill, Operations Supervisor, Wyoming Water Treatment Plant
Richard S. Bacon, Project Manager, Wixom WWTP
Don Baron, District Manager, Johnson Screens
Larry Campbell, Plant Superintendent, PARRC Wastewater Treatment Plant
Gerald H. Caron, Plant Superintendent,Wyoming Water Treatment Plant
Jim Carrol, Operations Supervisor, East Lansing-Meridian Township Water Authority
Patrick Cook, P.E, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
Ryan Craven, Project Foreman, C&D Hughes, Inc., Charlotte, MI
Jerry Crisp, Assistant Superintendent, Wastewater Treatment Plant, Brownsburg, IN
Delvin E. DeBoer, South Dakota State University
Bruce DeVantier, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale
Stanley Diamond, P.E., Associate, Greeley and Hansen, Indianapolis, IN
Kathy Dillon, Superintendent, Wastewater Treatment Plant, Brownsburg, IN
Chad Everts, Site Engineer, FTC&H, Grand Rapids, MI
Larry Fitzgerald, Director of Operations, Southern Clinton County Municipal Utilities
Authority
Ira Gabin, P.E., Vice President, Dixon Engineering, Lake Odessa, MI
Brock Howard, P.E., Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
James E. Kilduff, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Dave Koch, P.E., Project Manager, Black & Veatch, Grand Rapids, MI
Brian Lee, Operator, United Water, Armada Project
Andy Linebaugh, Michigan State University Physical Plant
Benjamin S. Magbanua, Jr., Mississippi State University
K. Andrews Miller, P.E., Associate, Greeley and Hansen, Indianapolis, IN
Pauline Rampanelli, Utility Plant Operator, Clean Water Plant, Wyoming, MI
Ed Renkie, Lansing Board of Water & Light, Lansing, MI
Mike St. Bernard, Plant Superintendent, East Lansing-Meridian Township Water Authority
Larry Sanford, Assistant Supervisor, Ann Arbor Water Treatment Plant
PREFACE Xxi
Susan J. Masten, Ph.D., P .E., Professor, College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Dr. Masten received her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Harvard University in
1989. Before joining the faculty at Michigan State University, she worked for several years in
environmental research at the University of Melbourne (Australia) and at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's Kerr Laboratory in Ada, Oklahoma.
Dr. Masten's research involves the use of chemical oxidants for the remediation of soils,
water, and leachates contaminated with hazardous organic chemicals. She has conducted research
on the in situ use of gaseous ozone to oxidize residual contaminants in saturated soils using
ozone sparging and in unsaturated soils using soil venting. Dr. Masten has evaluated the toxicity
of the by-products of chemical oxidation processes as measured by gap junction intercellular
communication. Her work has focused on the ozonation and chlorination of several pesticides,
including atrazine, alachlor, and lindane, and on the PAHs, especially pyrene. Dr. Masten has
also conducted research on the use of ozone-ceramic membrane filtration for the treatment of
drinking water containing organic matter and emerging contaminants. Her current work focuses
on the development of treatment technologies to mitigate lead and arsenic in drinking water. She
has authored over 100 publications and graduated over 50 M.S. students and 14 Ph.D. students.
Dr. Masten has more than 30 years of experience in drinking water treatment and presently
holds a position on the Michigan Board of Drinking Water Examiners and an appointment to the
State of Michigan Science Advisory Committee on PFAS Chemicals. She is leading efforts to
perform independent lead testing of premises and public schools in Flint, Michigan, and will take
a leadership role in the implementation of the proposed project.
Dr. Masten is a co-author of the textbook Principles of Environmental Engineering and
Science, now in its Fourth Edition.
College of Engineering
Michigan State University
428 S. Shaw Lane
East Lansing, MI 48824
xxiii
xDV PROFBSSIONAL ADVISORY BOARD FOR THE SECOND EDITION
Ms. Chesick is an active member of the Water Environment Federation, the Michigan Water
Environment Association, and the Indiana Water Environment Association and is the Past
President of the Indiana Water Environment Association.
Black & Veatch is an employee-owned, global leader in building critical human infrastruc-
ture in energy, water, telecommunications, and government services. Since 1915, the company
bas helped clients to improve the lives of people in more than 100 countries through consulting,
engineering, construction, operations, and program management. Black & Veatch's more than
10,000 professionals work out of over 100 offices worldwide. Visit the company at bv.com.
Black & Veatch' s water business helps communities and clients all over the world with the inno-
vative use of water resources, including treatment, conveyance infrastructure, water reuse sys-
tems, desalination, dams and hydropower, irrigation, flood management, and aquifer storage and
recovery.
~. BLACK&VEATCH
Black & Veatch
125 Ottawa Ave., Suite 380
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Geneva Vanlerberg, P.E., Manager of Water Production, Lansing Board of Water & Light
(BWL)
Ms. Vanlerberg is a licensed professional engineer and licensed F-1 drinking water plant
operator in the State of Michigan. She bas a B.S. in Civil Engineering and an M.S. in Envi-
ronmental Engineering from Michigan State University. Her progressive experience in design,
project management, and plant operation and management includes groundwater wells, lime-
soda softening, filtration, chemical feed systems, chloramination, high-service pumping, energy
efficiency, hydraulic modeling, and master planning. Ms. Vanlerberg manages two lime--soda
softening plants with total rated capacity of 50 MGD, five booster pumping stations, and over
125 groundwater wells.
The BWL was established in 1885 by a vote of the people of Lansing to fund a publicly
owned utility to meet their need for adequate fire protection, proper sanitation, and improved
street lighting. The water utility serves 166,000 retail customers and over 40,000 people through
wholesale contracts. Water is supplied by 125 wells, approximately 400 feet deep, to two water
conditioning plants, which produce on average 19.2 million gallons of water each day.
D.V
xxvi PROFBSSIONAL ADVISORY BOARD FOR THE FIRST HDmON
FTC&H has four other offices located in Michigan and Ohio. FfC&H specializes in engineering,
architecttJre, environmental science, and construction management
f1c&h
www.ftch.com
Fishbeck. Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc.
1515 Arboretum Drive, SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49546
f1c&h
www.ftch.com
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc.
1515 Arboretum Drive, SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49546
technology, water and sewer systems, intakes, pipelines, pumping stations, storm drainage and
flood control, airport and road improvements, and residential and commercial development
The American Water Works Association recognized Thomas Newhof s contributions to the
profession with the 1998 George Warren Fuller Award. The University of Michigan honored him
with the Jack A. Borchardt Award in 2008.
Mr. Newhof co-founded Prein&Newhof in 1969 with a fellow civil engineer. He is the
Chairman of the firm's Board of Directors, providing leadership for Prein&Newhofs 100
employees who work in its environmental laboratory and five offices located throughout West
Michigan.
P:rein&Newh.of
Prein&Newhof
3355 Evergreen Drive, NE
Grand Rapids, MI 49525
IAECOM
AECOM
5555 Glenwood Hills Pkwy, SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49512
xxviii PROFESSIONAL ADVISORY BOARD FOR THE FIRST EDmON
Tetra Tech provides consulting, engineering, and technical services worldwide. The
10,000 employees of Tetra Tech provide expertise in water and wastewater facility design
and operation, water resource management, program management, and construction services.
Tet.ra Tech
1921 E. Miller Road, Suite A
Lansing, MI 48911
Layne-Northern
3126 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
Lansing, MI 48906
CHAPTER
1
THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
PROCESSES
1
2 CHAPTER ONE
1-1 INTRODUCTION
Overview
Water and wastewater engineering encompasses the planning, design, construction, and supervi-
sion of water and wastewater systems. This chapter gives an overview of the design and construc-
tion process as an introduction to planning. Chapters 2 through 17 address water treatment. The
subject matter follows the flow of water (and the design of unit processes) from the development
of a source through the unit processes of coagulation, flocculation, softening, reverse osmosis,
nanofiltration, sedimentation, granular filtration, membrane filtration, disinfection, and residuals
management. The topics of wastewater treatment follow a similar pattern of following the flow
through a plant. Chapters 18 through 28 address preliminary treatment, primary treatment, sec-
ondary treatment, tertiary treatment, and residuals management. Special attention is given to the
application of membranes.
All projects begin with an identification of a problem by the regulator, the public, legal counsel. or owner.
The design professional then enters the project during the idea generation and evaluation phase of the
problem-solving activity. Thereafter, the design professional or firm generally participat.es actively in all
of the project's activities, typically until the end of the first year ofoperation (WEF, 1991).
The design professional may enter the process by many routes. Typically, one of the follow-
ing three methods or a combination of the methods is used to obtain engineering design services:
• Request for Qualifications (RFQ): The owner solicits qualifications from firms that wish to
be considered for engineering services on a design project.
• Request for Proposals (RFP): The owner solicits proposals for engineering services on a
project. The RFP usually includes a requirement to provide a statement of qualifications.
Alternatively, the RFQ may be a second step following the evaluation of the responses to
theRFP.
• Qualified Bidder Selection (QBS): The owner selects the design firm from a list of previ-
ously qualified companies.
THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES 3
TABLE1·1
Some observed professional-client relationship models
Model Description and comments
Agency Professional acts as an expert for agency, but agency has authority and responsibility.
Plausible for an attorney or a consultant to a government agency such as the Corps of
Engineers.
Contract Authority and responsibility shared equally. This model assumes bargaining between
equals. Not likely for an engineering consultant in classical design and construction.
Paternal Professional has superior knowledge and makes all the decisions for the client This
model assumes the professional has not only superior technical knowledge but also
knows what is in the client's best interest Paternalism requires justification because it
involves performing on behalf of the client regardless of that person's consent
Fiduciary Professional' s superior knowledge is recognized, but the client retains significant
authority and responsibility for decision making. The professional supplies ideas and
information and proposes courses of action. The client's judgement and consent are
required.
Extracted from Bayles, 1991.
In the case of the focus of this text, the owner is a municipality or an operating authority repre-
senting several municipalities.
The central issue in the professional-client relationship is the allocation of responsibility and
authority in decision making-who makes what decisions. These are ethical models that are, in
effect, models of different distributions of authority and responsibility in decision making. One
can view the professional-client relationship as one in which the client has the most authority and
responsibility in decision making, the professional being an employee; one in which the profes-
sional and the client are equals, either dealing at arm's length or at a more personal level; or one
in which the professional, in different degrees, has the primary role (Bayles, 1991). The models
are summarized in Table 1-1.
First Canon
This canon is paramount. It is held superior to all the others.
Regulations, codes, and standards serve as the engineer's guidance in ensuring that the facili-
ties are safe and protect the health of the community. A large portion of this book and, for that
4 CHAPTER ONE
FunclamenUI Canons
1. Engineen shall hold parammmt the safety, health and welfare
of the public and shall strive to comply with the principles of
sustainable development in the performance of their professional
duties.
2. Engineen shall perform services only in areas of their
competence.
3. Engineers shall issue public: statements only in an objective and
truthful manner.
4. Engineen shall act in professional matters for each employer or
client as faithful agents or trustees and shall avoid conflicts of
interest.
5. Engineers shall build their professional reputation on the lllf:rit of
their services and shall not compete unfairly with others.
6. Engineen shall act in such a manner as to uphold and enhance the
honor, integrity, and dignify of the engineering profession.
7. Engineers shall continue their professional development through-
out their careers and shall provide opportunities for the profes-
sional development of those engineers under their supervision.
8. Engineen shall, in all matters related to their profession, treat
all persons fairly and encourage equitable participation without
regard to gender or gender identity, race, national origin. ethnic-
ity, religion, age, sexual orientation, disability, political affiliation,
or family, marital, or economic status. FIGURE 1-1
American Society of Civil Engineers code of ethics.
matter, the education of environmental engineers is focused on these two issues. They will be
discussed in more detail at appropriate points in the remaining chapters.
The public "welfare" is not articulated in regulations, codes, and standards. It is comprised of
two parts: prosperity and happiness. The public prospers when the decisions of the professional
result in economical projects. The public is "happy" when their trust and reliance on the profes-
sional is justified by successful completion of a project
Economical projects do not imply the cheapest project. Rather, they imply projects that
serve the client's needs and satisfy the client's elective options while conforming to regula-
tory constraints. In the classical engineering approach economical projects are achieved by
the following:
Many times these items are addressed in the engineering firm's proposal. In the proposal pro-
cess, the clarity with which these are addressed may serve as a basis for selection of the engi-
neering firm.
The scope and extent of engineering work should be explicitly defined, in writing, to
avoid misunderstanding. The scope ensures that the client understands the limits of the work
the engineer is willing and/or able to perform. It provides the engineer with a framework for
establishing the fee and level of effort to be provided as well as ensuring that the engineer is
not expected to perform work outside of the area of competence. It may include such things as
personnel assigned to the project, their qualifications and responsibilities, evaluation of alterna-
tives, design of the facility, preparing detail drawings, cost estimates, evaluating bids, as well as
bidder qualifications, surveying, staking the project, preparation of operation and maintenance
manuals, attendance at meetings, and documentation.
The starting and completion dates provide both the client and the engineer with realistic
expectations as to the progress of the project.
The scope meeting should identify the design engineer's responsibilities for construction
inspection. Typically, the design engineering firm provides a field engineer and/or a construction
observer to diligently observe and, to the best of their ability, assure the owner that the construc-
tion is taking place in accordance with the plans and specifications as the project is being built.
Although a field engineer from a firm not involved in the design may be retained, it is preferable
that the design firm provide the engineer to ensure continuity. While construction observers may
be competent to do routine examinations of the progress of work, they generally do not have the
technical background to ensure compliance with design specifications unless they are given spe-
cific training. For large projects, a full-time field engineer is on site. For small projects, periodic
inspection and inspection at critical construction milestones are provided.
Small engineering firms may not have the expertise to provide the design specifications for
all of the components of the design. In this instance, the responsibility for providing allied engi-
neering services such as geotechnical/soils consultants and electrical, mechanical, and structural
engineering as well as architectural services should be spelled out in writing at the scope meeting.
The professional engineering qualifications of those supplying the allied engineering should also
6 CHAPTER ONE
TABLE1·2
Common fee structures
Model Description and comments
Fixed percentage The engineering fee is a fixed percentage of the final cost of the constructed
facility. There is a negative incentive for the engineer to produce an economical
design. This fee system is outdated and rarely, if ever, used.
Fixed fee (lump sum) The engineering fee is a stated sum. There is no incentive for the engineer
to explore alternatives when it is specified as part of the work. There is an
incentive to get the work done as expeditiously as possible.
Time and materials The cost of engineering services (the amount paid for salaries, fringe benefits,
(T&M) or time and retirement allowances, and operating costs) plus a percentage for overhead
expenses (T&E) and a fee for profit. In this procedure, the client will pay the "true" cost of the
engineering. However, without a scope of work and deadline, there is an no
incentive for the engineer to expedite the work.
Time and materials, Same as T &M above but a maximum fee is specified. This provides the
not to exceed engineer some incentive to expedite the work but only so as not to exceed
the ceiling fee. On the other hand, the owner has an incentive to expand the
scope. Both parties need to be alert to these possibilities and make appropriate
adjustments.
be explicitly defined. For example, structural engineers that specialize in building design may not
be appropriate for designing structures subject to aggressive wastewater.
Billing schedules and expectations of payment are also included in the scope meeting. Typical
fee structures are outlined in Table 1-2.
Economic analysis of alternatives, selection of lowest responsible bidder, and diligent
inspection of the work in progress will be discussed in the context of the design/construction
process described below.
Turning to the issue of ''happiness" or more formally ''How is trust and reliance on the profes-
sional justified?," three elements are to be considered:
For all but the very largest municipal systems, the first two models of the professional--cli-
ent relationship, Agency and Contract, do not apply. That leaves us with the latter two mod-
els. "Although a professional and a client are not equals, sufficient client competence exists to
undermine the paternalistic model as appropriate for their usual relationship. Clients can exercise
judgement over many aspects of professional services. If they lack information to make decisions,
professionals can provide it'' (Bayles, 1991). This is not meant to suggest that the public needs to
be taught environmental engineering. Rather, it suggests that educated members of our modem
society are capable of understanding alternatives and making reasonable choices based on their
values. They should be provided enough information to make choices that accomplish their pur-
poses-not those of the professional.
THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES 7
The client's view of the project is most closely matched by the Fiduciary model, where the
client has more authority and responsibility in decision making than in the Paternal model. The
client must exercise judgement and offer or withhold consent in the decision-making process.
In the Fiduciary model, the client depends on the professional for much of the information they
need to give or withhold their consent. The term consents (the client consents) rather than decides
(the client decides) indicates that it is the professional's role to propose courses of action. It is
not the conception of two people contributing equally to the formulation of plans, whether or not
dealing at arm's length. Rather, the professional supplies the ideas and information, and the client
agrees or not. For the process to work, the client must trust the professional to analyze accurately
the problem, canvass the feasible alternatives and associated costs, know as well as one can their
likely consequences, fully convey this information to the client, perhaps make a recommenda-
tion, and work honestly and loyally for the client to effectuate the chosen alternative. In short,
the client must rely on the professional to use his or her knowledge and ability in the client's
interests. Because the client cannot check most of the work of the professional or the information
supplied, the professional has special obligations to the client to ensure that the trust and reliance
are justified.
This is not to suggest that the professional simply presents an overall recommendation for the
client's acceptance or rejection. Rather, a client's interests can be affected by various aspects of a
professional's work, so the client should be consulted at various times (Bayles, 1991).
"Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without com-
promising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" (WECD, 1987). If we look
beyond the simple idea of providing water and controlling pollution to the larger idea of sustain-
ing our environment and protecting the public health, we see that there are better solutions for our
pollution problems. For example:
Second Canon
Engineers are smart, confident people. With experience, we gain wisdom. The flaw of our nature
is to overextend our wisdom to areas not included in our experience. Great care must be taken to
limit engineering services to areas of competence. Jobs may be too large, too complicated, require
technology, or techniques that are not within our experience. Competence gained by education
or by supervised on-the-job training sets the boundaries on the areas in which we can provide
service. Others more qualified must be called upon to provide service beyond these experiences.
Engineers are creative. We pride ourselves in developing innovative solutions. We believe
that civilization advances with advances in technology. Someone has to build the first pyramid,
the first iron bridge, the first sand filter. Many times "the first" design fails (Petroski, 1985). Thus,
there may be a conflict between creativity and service in an area of competence. The conflict must
be resolved very carefully. Although safety factors, bench and pilot scale experiments, and com-
puter simulations may be used, the client and professional must, in a very explicit way, agree on
8 CHAPTER ONE
a venture into uncharted territory. If the territory is simply uncharted for the design engineer but
not for the profession, then the design engineer must employ a partner that can bring experience
or obtain the necessary training to become competent.
Third Canon
It may not seem that engineers would be called upon to issue public statements. Yet, there are
numerous times that public statements are issued. Often these are formal, such as signing con-
tracts, making presentations to a city council or other public body, and issuing statements to the
news media. In other instances, it is not so obvious that the statements are public. Verbal state-
ments to individual members of the public, posting of signs, and signing change orders on gov-
ernment financed projects are examples of informal public statements.
Fourth Canon
A faithful agent is more than a loyal one. A faithful agent must be completely frank and open with
his/her employer and client. This means getting the facts, explaining them, and not violating the
other canons to please the client or your employer.
Conflicts of interest may be subtle. A free lunch, a free trip, or a golf outing may not seem
like much of a conflict of interest, but in the eyes of the public, any gift may be seen as an attempt
to gain favors. Appearances do count and, in the public's view, perception is reality.
Fifth Canon
This canon appears to be self-explanatory. We understand that cheating on exams is unethical.
Likewise, cheating by claiming credit for work that someone else has done is unethical.
Unfair competition has taken a broad meaning in the review of ethics boards. For example,
offering services to a potential client that has retained another engineer to do the same work falls
into the category of unfair competition if the engineer solicits the work. The circumstances are
different if the client solicits the engineer after having already retained another engineer. This
type of request must be treated with great care. It is best to decline this type of employment until
the client and original engineer resolve or dissolve their relationship.
Similarly, a request to review the work of another engineering firm may be construed to be
unfair competition. The best procedure is for the client to advise the original firm of their desire
to have an independent review. Another alternative is to advise the originating engineering firm
that the request has been made. This is a matter of courtesy, if not a matter of ethics.
Sixth Canon
This canon has two elements. The first is to treat others with the same courtesy that you
would expect from them. The second is to behave such that the credibility of your work is not
jeopardized.
Seventh Canon
Engineers use technology both in the process of doing their job and in the provision of solutions
to problems. It is incumbent on them to keep up with the technology. One of the best means of
doing this is to participate in one of the relevant professional societies by attending meetings,
THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES 9
reading journal articles, and participating in workshops. Appropriate organizations for municipal
water and wastewater engineering include the American Society of Civil Engineers (Journal
of Environmental Engineering), American Water Works Association (Journal A WWA), and the
Water Environment Federation (Water Environment Research).
Eighth Canon
ASCE' s Board of Direction provides the following guidelines:
Engineers shall conduct themselves in a manner in which all persons are treated with dignity,
respect, and fairness. Engineers shall not engage in discrimination or harassment in connection
with their professional activities. Engineers shall consider the diversity of the community and
shall endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of
their professional services.
1. The consent is given voluntarily without being subjected to force, fraud, or deception.
2. The consent is based on the information that a rational person would want, together with
any other information requested, presented to them in an understandable form.
3. The decision is made by an individual competent to process the information and make
rational decisions.
10 CHAPTER ONE
4. The consent is offered in proxy by an individual or group that collectively represents many
people of like interests, concerns, and exposure to the risks that result from the decision.
To go beyond the minimalist level of holding the public welfare paramount, the professional
engineer must view the relationship to the client as fiducial. They owe the client responsible care.
The client must be given the right and opportunity to express informed consent or to withhold
consent as they deem fit. This is not to say that the client must consent to the selection of every
nut and bolt in the project, but rather that critical decision points must be identified for the cli-
ent. At these decision points the client must be provided enough information to allow rational
decisions. This information should include the alternatives, the consequences of choosing one
alternative over another, and the data and/or logic the engineer used to arrive at the consequences.
wells. For wastewater treatment, the alternatives to facility construction might include connection to
a nearby community's system or controlling infiltration and inflow into the sewer system. In addi-
tion, the null alternative, that is the cost of doing nothing must also be considered.
Establishment of Design Criteria. Design criteria are the boundary conditions that establish
the functional performance of the facility. Two general types of criteria are used: performance
and prescriptive. Performance criteria define the desired objective, but not the means of achiev-
ing it. Prescriptive criteria define the explicit details of how the facility will be built. The design
criteria are frequently a combination of the two types of criteria.
Water and wastewater treatment systems will be used for illustration in the following para-
graphs. Some of the factors to be considered will differ for water supply and sewer systems.
Six factors are normally considered in establishing the design criteria for water and wastewater
treatment systems:
• Raw water or wastewater characteristics.
• Environmental and regulatory standards.
• System reliability.
• Facility limits.
• Design life.
• Cost.
Raw water or wastewater characteristics. Water characteristics include the demand for water
and the composition of the untreated (raw) water. Wastewater characteristics include the flow
rate of the wastewater and its composition.
Sound design practice must anticipate the range of conditions that the facility or process can reasonably be
expected to encounter during the design period. The range of conditions for a plant typically varies from
a reasonably certain mini.mum in its first year of operation to the maximum anticipated in the last year of
the design service period in a service area with growth of customers .... Often the mini.mum is overlooked
and the maximum is overstated (WEF, 1991).
Consideration of the flowrates during the early years of operation is often overlooked, and over sizing
of equipment and inefficient operations can result (Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 2003).
• Rainfall/runoff intrusion.
• Groundwater infiltration.
• Raw water mineral composition.
Water quality standards to be met. Early consideration of the water quality standards provides
the basis for elimination of treatment technologies that are not appropriate. The standards are pre-
scribed by the regulating agency. The standards require that the treatment facility provide potable
water or discharge wastewater that meets numerical requirements (performance standards). They
are based on statutory requirements. For example, regulations specify the concentration of coli-
form organisms that may be delivered to consumers or discharged into a river. For wastewater,
modeling studies of the stream or river may also be required. For the river, the regulating agency
will focus on the critical seasonal parameters for the stream or river. Normally, this will be in the
summer dry-season because the flow in the river or stream will be low (reducing the capacity for
assimilation of the treated wastewater), the oxygen carrying capacity of the stream will be low
(stressing the aquatic population), and the potential exposure from recreational activities will be
high. The potable water or wastewater effluent standards do not prescribe the technology that is
to be used in meeting the standards, but they do establish the goals that the engineer uses to select
the appropriate treatment processes.
System reliability. System reliability refers to the ability of a component or system to perform
its designated function without failure. Regulatory reliability requirements are, in fact, redun-
dancy requirements. True reliability requirements would specify the mean time between failure
for given components or processes. This is difficult, if not impossible, criteria to specify or, for
that matter, to design, for the wide range of equipment and environmental conditions encountered
in municipal water and wastewater projects.
For water supply systems, some redundancy recommendations of the Great Lakes-Upper
Mississippi River Board of State and Provincial Pubic Health and Environmental Managers are
shown in Table 1-3 (GLUMRB, 2003).
There are three "reliability" classes for wastewater treatment facilities established by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Class I reliability is required for those plants that
discharge into navigable waters that could be permanently or unacceptably damaged by effluent
that was degraded in quality for only a few hours. Class II reliability is required for those plants
that discharge into navigable waters that would not be permanently or unacceptably damaged
by short-term effluent quality, but could be damaged by continued (several days) effluent qual-
ity degradation. Class ill reliability is required for all other plants (U.S. EPA, 1974). Table 1-4
provides EPA guidance on minimum equipment to meet reliability requirements. In reviewing
the design that is submitted by the engineer, the regulatory agency uses this guidance to estab-
lish prescriptive requirements prior to the issuance of the permit to construct the facility. Some
states may require more stringent requirements than the federal guidance. For example, Michigan
requires Class I reliability for all plants.
1HE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES 13
TABLE1·3
Guidance for minimum equipment and process reliability for water treatment
Component Recommendation
Source
Surface water
Capacity Meet a one-in-50-year drought with due consideration for multiple year
droughts
Intake structures Where intake tower is used, provide two independent intake cells, each
with three intake ports at different elevations
Pumps Minimum of two; meet the maximum day demand with one unit out of
service
Groundwater
Capacity Equal or exceed maximum day demand with largest producing well out
of service
Wells Minimum of two
Treatment
Rapid mix Minimum of two; meet the maximum day demand with one unit out of
service
Flocculation Minimum of two; meet the maximum day demand with one unit out of
service
Sedimentation Minimum of two; meet the maximum day demand with one unit out of
service
Disinfection Minimum of two; meet the maximum day demand with one unit out of
service
Power Provide primary transmission lines from two separate sources or
standby generator
Finished water storage
Capacity Equal to the average day demand when fire protection is not provided
Meet domestic demand and fire flow demand where fire protection is
provided
Distribution
High service pumps Minimum of two; meet the maximum day demand with one unit out of
service
System pressure Minimum of 140 .kPa at ground level at all points in the system
Nominal working pressure should be 410 to 550 kPa and not less than
240kPa
Satin. Minä myös sivalsin ukkoa, pari kolme kertaa… Paljoko sille
tarvitsi! Kutsu minut todistajaksi, Vasjka!…
Sisustus sama kuin 1:ssä, paitsi että Pepelin komero on pois purettu
ja sillä paikalla missä Kleschj istuskeli, ei ole alasinta. Pepelin
komeron paikalla loikoilee nyt Tattari levotonna, ähkyen silloin
tällöin. Kleschj istuu pöydän takana, korjailee hanuria, koetellen
silloin tällöin sen ääniä. Toisessa päässä pöytää ovat: Satin, Parooni
ja Nastja; heidän edessään pöydällä on pullo viinaa, 3 pulloa olutta
ja iso kannikka mustaa leipää. Uunilla piehtaroipi ja yskii Näyttelijä.
On yö; näyttämö on valaistu lampulla, joka seisoo keskellä pöytää.
Ulkona tuulee.
Nastja. Se oli hyvä ukko!… Mutta te… te ette ole ihmisiä… vaan
ruostetta!
Parooni. Mutta siitä tulisi hauska taulu, lady… jos nelin ryömin…
Näyttelijä. Minä!
(Paussi).
Parooni (miettiväisenä). Thja… Parempaa varten? Tässä johtuu
mieleeni meidän perhe… Vanhaa sukua… Katharinan ajoilta…
aatelisia… sotilaita!… polveutuivat Franskasta… Palvelivat ja
kohosivat aina korkeammalle… Nikolai I aikana oli iso-isälläni
Gustave Débile'llä korkea asema… rikkautta… satoja maa-orjia…
hevosia… kokkeja…
Parooni. Minä… en voi sallia, että minusta tehdään pilaa! Minä voin
näyttää toteen… minulla on todistuksia, piru vieköön!
Nastja. Voi jos… minä voisin! Niin… noin minä tekisin teille!
Parooni. Hm — Ilkiö!
(Menee. Paussi).
Tattari. Mitä?
Bubnov. Missä kaikki kansa on? Miksi ei täällä ole yhtään ihmistä?
Hei, alas sieltä kaikki… nyt minä kestitsen! Ken on siellä nurkassa?
(Laulaa tanssien).
Kummilla on rahoja,
Minulla ei mitään!
Olen sentään iloinen
Ja sentään minä olen aina hyvä poika!
Kylmä on!
Medvedjev. Minä!
Satin. Me kuuntelemme!
Vankila on pimeä-ä!
Esirippu
Welcome to Our Bookstore - The Ultimate Destination for Book Lovers
Are you passionate about testbank and eager to explore new worlds of
knowledge? At our website, we offer a vast collection of books that
cater to every interest and age group. From classic literature to
specialized publications, self-help books, and children’s stories, we
have it all! Each book is a gateway to new adventures, helping you
expand your knowledge and nourish your soul
Experience Convenient and Enjoyable Book Shopping Our website is more
than just an online bookstore—it’s a bridge connecting readers to the
timeless values of culture and wisdom. With a sleek and user-friendly
interface and a smart search system, you can find your favorite books
quickly and easily. Enjoy special promotions, fast home delivery, and
a seamless shopping experience that saves you time and enhances your
love for reading.
Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and
personal growth!
ebooksecure.com