0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

IGP Session 9 - Moodle

The document discusses virtual teams, defined as geographically dispersed groups that communicate through technology, and highlights various issues they face, such as trust and communication. It categorizes conflicts within these teams into task, relationship, process, and status conflicts, detailing their characteristics and impacts on team performance. Additionally, it suggests strategies for managing multicultural teams, including adaptation and various forms of intervention.

Uploaded by

p24aniketm
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

IGP Session 9 - Moodle

The document discusses virtual teams, defined as geographically dispersed groups that communicate through technology, and highlights various issues they face, such as trust and communication. It categorizes conflicts within these teams into task, relationship, process, and status conflicts, detailing their characteristics and impacts on team performance. Additionally, it suggests strategies for managing multicultural teams, including adaptation and various forms of intervention.

Uploaded by

p24aniketm
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

10/20/2023

Virtual Teams?

VIRTUAL TEAMS, MULTI-CULTURAL  Also known as a geographically dispersed team, is


TEAMS & CONFLICTS a group of individuals who work across
 time,

 space and,
 organizationalboundaries with links strengthened by
webs of communication technology.
 Examples: teams across regions

IGP Session 9

1 2

Communications and Distance Allen’s curve


Next Door
Likely to communicate weekly

Same Aisle
Rare to communicate weekly

Different floor or across the globe


Slim chance of communicating weekly

3 4

1
10/20/2023

Virtual Teams: Issues Conflicts: Types

Trust  Task conflicts


 Disagreement over the goal of a task or project or what you
are trying to achieve
Communication
◼ What are you trying to do?
Conflict  Examples:
◼ Agenda for a staff meeting
Issues ◼ How the success of a new initiatives should be defined or measured?
◼ Whether to prioritize revenue or customer satisfaction?
◼ Whether the customers or employees should come first?

Accountability  Positively associated with decision quality, commitment (Amason,


Skills 1996; Parayitam and Dooley, 2007).
Gallo, A. (2017). HBR guide to dealing with conflict.
Monalisa, M., Daim, T., Mirani, F., Dash, P., Khamis, R., & Bhusari, V. (2008). Managing global design teams. Research Technology Management,
51(4), 48–59.

5 6

Conflicts: Types Conflicts: Types


 Relationship conflict (Interpersonal or affective conflict)  Process conflicts
 A clash of personalities.  How to carry out a project, the means or process you use
◼ When one or both of you feel disrespected or hurt? to reach your goal
 Examples ◼ How you’re doing it?
◼ Snapping at each other in meetings  Examples
◼ Exchanging snarky emails
◼ How to implement a new HR policy?
◼ Interrupting, or talking over, a colleague in a meeting
◼ How decision should be made in a meeting?
◼ Arguing over who’s right and who’s wrong
◼ How quickly a project should be completed?
 Negatively associated with decision quality, group member
◼ Who should be consulted and included in the project?
satisfaction and commitment (Amason, 1996; Jehn and Mannix, 2001)
 Negatively affects performance (Jehn and Mannix, 2001)
Gallo, A. (2017). HBR guide to dealing with conflict. Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23(2),
323-340.

7 8

2
10/20/2023

Conflicts: Types Managing Multicultural Teams


 Status conflict
 Disputes over relative status positions in group’s social  Adaptation
hierarchy.
◼ Who’s in charge or who deserves credit for the work?
 Structural Intervention
 Examples  Managerial Intervention
◼ Competing to run a high profile project  Exit
◼ Arguing over or dominating shared resources
◼ Competing for status symbols like corner office, latest technology, or
an assistant
◼ Jockeying for leadership, especially in a team without a formal
leader
 Negatively affects performance (Bendersky & Hays, 2012)
Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23(2),
323-340.

9 10

References
 Amason, A. 1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict
on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams.
Acad. Management J. 39(1) 123–148.
 Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization
Science, 23(2), 323-340.
 Bhusari, Vijay, Mitali Monalisa, Rabah Khamis, Fahim Mirani, and Pranabesh Dash.
"Managing global design teams." In Management of Engineering and Technology,
Portland International Center for, pp. 1356-1371. IEEE, 2007.
 Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness
research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of management, 23(3),
239-290.
 Gallo, A. (2017). HBR guide to dealing with conflict. Harvard Press, Boston.
 Jehn, K. A., E. A. Mannix. 2001. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study
of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. 44(2) 238–
251

11

You might also like