The How and Why of One Variable Calculus 1st Edition Amol Sasane Download
The How and Why of One Variable Calculus 1st Edition Amol Sasane Download
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-how-and-why-of-one-variable-
calculus-1st-edition-amol-sasane/
https://textbookfull.com/product/plain-plane-geometry-1st-
edition-amol-sasane/
https://textbookfull.com/product/one-variable-advanced-calculus-
kenneth-kuttler/
https://textbookfull.com/product/calculus-single-variable-
bretscher/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-course-in-analysis-volume-i-
introductory-calculus-analysis-of-functions-of-one-real-
variable-1st-edition-niels-jacob/
A Course in Analysis Volume I Introductory Calculus
Analysis of Functions of One Real Variable 1st Edition
Niels Jacob
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-course-in-analysis-volume-i-
introductory-calculus-analysis-of-functions-of-one-real-
variable-1st-edition-niels-jacob-2/
https://textbookfull.com/product/multi-variable-calculus-1st-
edition-yunzhi-zou/
https://textbookfull.com/product/single-variable-calculus-robert-
lopez/
https://textbookfull.com/product/calculus-of-single-variable-
with-calcchat-and-calcview-edwards/
https://textbookfull.com/product/single-variable-calculus-early-
transcendentals-james-stewart/
The How and Why of
One Variable Calculus
The How and Why of
One Variable Calculus
Amol Sasane
London School of Economics, UK
This edition first published 2015
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Registered office
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to
reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com.
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs
and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form
or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright,
Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in
electronic books.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product
names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The
publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book,
they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and
specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the under-
standing that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be
liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent
professional should be sought.
ISBN: 9781119043386
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
1 2015
To my parents
Contents
Preface ix
Introduction xi
Preliminary notation xv
2 Sequences 44
2.1 Limit of a convergent sequence 46
2.2 Bounded and monotone sequences 54
2.3 Algebra of limits 59
2.4 Sandwich theorem 64
2.5 Subsequences 68
2.6 Cauchy sequences and completeness of R 74
2.7 (∗) Pointwise versus uniform convergence 78
Notes 85
3 Continuity 86
3.1 Definition of continuity 86
3.2 Continuous functions preserve convergence 91
viii CONTENTS
4 Differentiation 125
4.1 Differentiable Inverse Theorem 136
4.2 The Chain Rule 140
4.3 Higher order derivatives and derivatives at boundary points 144
4.4 Equations of tangent and normal lines to a curve 148
4.5 Local minimisers and derivatives 157
4.6 Mean Value, Rolle’s, Cauchy’s Theorem 159
4.7 Taylor’s Formula 167
4.8 Convexity 172
0
4.9 0 form of l’Hôpital’s Rule 180
Notes 182
5 Integration 183
5.1 Towards a definition of the integral 183
5.2 Properties of the Riemann integral 198
5.3 Fundamental Theorem of Calculus 210
5.4 Riemann sums 226
5.5 Improper integrals 232
5.6 Elementary transcendental functions 245
5.7 Applications of Riemann Integration 278
Notes 296
6 Series 297
6.1 Series 297
6.2 Absolute convergence 305
6.3 Power series 320
Appendix 335
Notes 337
Solutions 338
Solutions to the exercises from Chapter 1 338
Solutions to the exercises from Chapter 2 353
Solutions to the exercises from Chapter 3 369
Solutions to the exercises from Chapter 4 388
Solutions to the exercises from Chapter 5 422
Solutions to the exercises from Chapter 6 475
Bibliography 493
Index 495
Preface
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Sara Maad Sasane (Lund University) for going through the entire
manuscript, pointing out typos and mistakes, and offering insightful suggestions and
comments. Thanks are also due to Lassi Paunonen (Tampere University) and Raymond
Mortini (University of Lorraine-Metz) for many useful comments. A few pedagogical ideas
in this book stem from some of the references listed at the end of this book. This applies also
to the exercises. References are given in the section on notes at the end of the chapters, but
no claim to originality is made in case there is a missing reference. The figures in this book
have been created using xfig, Maple, and MATLAB. Finally, it is a pleasure to thank the
editors and staff at Wiley, especially Debbie Jupe, Heather Kay, and Prachi Sinha Sahay.
Thanks are also due to the project manager, Sangeetha Parthasarathy, for cheerfully and
patiently overseeing the typesetting of the book.
Amol Sasane
London, 2014.
Introduction
What is Calculus?
Calculus is a branch of mathematics in which the focus is on two main things: given a
real-valued function of a real variable, what is the rate of change of the function at a point
(Differentiation), and what is the area under the graph of the function over an interval
(Integration).
f
f
c a b
What is the steepness/slope of f What is the area under the graph of f
at the point c? over an interval from a to b?
Differentiation Integration
Differentiation is concerned with Integration is concerned with
velocities, accelerations, curvatures, etc. areas, volumes, average values, etc.
These are rates of change These take into account
of function values the totality of function values,
and are defined locally. and are not defined locally.
xii INTRODUCTION
and we see that in the above process, the values of the function over the entire interval from a
to b do matter. In this sense integration is a ‘non-local’ or ‘global’ process.
Thus it seems that in Calculus, there are these two quite different topics of study. However
there is a remarkable fact, known as that Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which creates a
bridge between these seemingly different worlds: it says, roughly speaking that the processes
of differentiation and integration are inverses of each other:
b x
d
f (x)dx = f (b) − f (a) and f (ξ)dξ = f (x).
a dx a
This interaction between differentiation and integration provides a powerful body of under-
standing and calculational technique, called ‘Calculus’. Problems that would be otherwise
computationally difficult can be solved mechanically using a few simple Calculus rules, and
without the exertion of a great deal of penetrating thought.
(1) What is the escape velocity of a rocket on the surface of the Earth?
(2) If a hole of radius 1 cm is drilled along a diametrical axis in a solid sphere of radius
2 cm, then what is the volume of the body left over?
(3) If a strain of bacteria grows at a rate proportional to the amount present, and if the
population doubles in an hour, then what is the population of bacteria at any time t?
(4) If the manufacturing cost of x lamps is given by C(x) = 2700 − 100x, and the revenue
function is given by R(x) = x − 0.03x2 , then what is the number of lamps maximising
the profit?
We will primarily be concerned with developing and understanding the tools of Calculus,
but now and then in the exercises and examples chosen, we will consider a few toy models
from various application areas to illustrate how the techniques of Calculus have universal
applications.
INTRODUCTION xiii
···
In Figure 1, it is clear that what we are doing is trying to obtain the area of a circle by inscribing
polygons inside it, each time doubling the number of sides, hence ‘exhausting’ more and more
of the circular area. The idea is then that if A is the area of the circle we seek, and an is the
area of the polygon at the nth step, then for large n, an approximates A. As we have that
a1 ≤ a2 ≤ a3 ≤ · · ·, and since an misses A by smaller and smaller amounts as n increases, we
expect that A should the ‘smallest’ number exceeding the numbers a1 , a2 , a3 , · · ·. Does such a
number always exist?
Obviously, one can question the validity of this heuristic approach to solving the problem.
The objections are for example:
(1) We did not really define what we mean by the area enclosed.
(2) We are not sure about what properties of numbers we are allowed to use. For example,
we seem to be needing the fact that ‘if we have an increasing sequence of numbers,
all of which are less than a certain number1 , then there is a smallest number which
is bigger than each of the numbers a1 , a2 , a3 , · · ·’. Is this property true for rational
numbers?
Such questions might seem frivolous to a scientist who is just interested in ‘real world appli-
cations’. But such a sloppy attitude can lead to trouble. Indeed, some work done in the 16th to
the 18th century relying on a mixture of deductive reasoning and intuition, involving vaguely
defined terms, was later shown to be incorrect. To give the student a quick example of how
things might easily go wrong, one might naively, but incorrectly, guess that the answer to
question (2) above is yes. This prompts the question of whether there is a bigger set of num-
bers than the rational numbers for which the property happens to be true? The answer is yes,
and this is the real number system R.
Thus a thorough treatment of Calculus must start with a careful study of the number system
in which the action of Calculus takes place, and this is the real number system R, where our
journey begins!
1 imagine a square circumscribing the circle: then each of the numbers a , a , a , · · · are all less than the area of
1 2 3
the square
Preliminary notation
A := B or B =: A A is defined to be B; A is defined by B
∃ there exists
A⊂B A is a subset of B
From the considerations in the Introduction, it is clear that in order to have a firm foundation
of Calculus, one needs to study the real numbers carefully. We will do this in this chapter. The
plan is as follows:
(1) An intuitive, visual picture of R: the number line. We will begin our understanding of
R intuitively as points on the ‘number line’. This way, we will have a mental picture of R,
in order to begin stating the precise properties of the real numbers that we will need in the
sequel. It is a legitimate issue to worry about the actual construction of the set of real numbers,
and we will say something about this in Section 1.8.
(2) Properties of R. Having a rough feeling for the real numbers as being points of the real
line, we will proceed to state the precise properties of the real numbers we will need. So we
will think of R as an undefined set for now, and just state rigorously what properties we need
this set R to have. These desirable properties fall under three categories:
(a) the field axioms, which tell us about what laws the arithmetic of the real numbers should
follow,
(b) the order axiom, telling us that comparison of real numbers is possible with an
order > and what properties this order relation has, and
(c) the Least Upper Bound Property of R, which tells us roughly that unlike the set of
rational numbers, the real number line has ‘no holes’. This last property is the most
important one from the viewpoint of Calculus: it is the one which makes Calculus
possible with real numbers. If rational numbers had this nice property, then we would
not have bothered studying real numbers, and instead we would have just used rational
numbers for doing Calculus.
The How and Why of One Variable Calculus, First Edition. Amol Sasane.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2 THE HOW AND WHY OF ONE VARIABLE CALCULUS
(3) The construction of R. Although we will think of real numbers intuitively as ‘numbers
that can be depicted on the number line’, this is not acceptable as a rigorous mathematical
definition. So one can ask:
Is there really a set R that can be constructed which has the stipulated properties
(2)(a), (b), and (c) (and which will be detailed further in Sections 1.2, 1.3, 1.4)?
The answer is yes, and we will make some remarks about this in Section 1.8.
0 1
Construction of
Properties of
(1) Field axioms (laws of arithmetic)
(2) Order axioms (>, <, = )
(3) The Least Upper Bound Property
−2 −1 0 1 2
Just like the integers can be depicted on the number line, we can also depict all rational num-
bers on it as follows. First of all, here is a procedure for dividing a unit length on the number
line into d (∈ N) equal parts, allowing us to construct the rational number 1/d on the number
line. See Figure 1.1.
O A B
0 1
A′
B′
Figure 1.1 Construction of rational numbers: in the above picture, given the length 1 (that
is, knowing the position of B), we can construct the length 1/5, and so the point A corresponds
to the rational number 1/5.
The steps are as follows: Let the points O and B correspond to the numbers 0 and 1.
(1) Take any arbitrary length (OA ) along a ray starting at O in any direction other than
that of the number line itself.
(2) Let B be a point on the ray such that (OB ) = d · (OA ).
(3) Draw AA parallel to BB to meet the number line at A.
Conclusion: From the similar triangles ΔOAA and ΔOBB , we see that the length
(OA) = 1/d.
Having obtained 1/d, we can now construct n/d on the number line for any n ∈ Z, by
repeating the length 1/d n times towards the right of 0 if n > 0, and towards the left −n times
from 0 if n is negative.
Hence, we can depict all the rational numbers on the number line. Does this exhaust the
number line? That is, suppose that we start with all the points on the number line being
coloured black, and suppose that at a later time, we colour all the rational ones by red: are
there any black points left over? The answer is yes, and we demonstrate this below. We will
show that there does ‘exist’, based on geometric reasoning, a point
√ on the number line, whose
square is 2, but we will also argue that this number, denoted by 2, is not a rational number.
4 THE HOW AND WHY OF ONE VARIABLE CALCULUS
√
First of all, the picture below shows that 2 exists as a point on the number line. Indeed,
by looking at the right angled triangle ΔOBA, Pythagoras’s Theorem tells us that the length
of the hypotenuse OA satisfies
((OA))2 = ((OB))2 + ((AB))2 = 12 + 12 = 2,
√
and so (OA) is a number, denoted say by 2, whose square is 2. By taking O as the centre
and radius (OA), we can draw a circle √
using a√compass that intersects the number line at
a point C, corresponding to the number 2. Is 2 a rational number? We show below that
it isn’t!
A
√
O B 2
√
Exercise 1.1. Depict −11/6 and 3 on the number line.
√
Theorem 1.1 (An ‘origami’ proof of the irrationality of 2). There is no rational number
q ∈ Q such that q2 = 2.
√
Proof. Suppose that 2 is a rational number. Then some scaling of the triangle
√
2
1
by an integer will produce a similar triangle, all of whose sides are integers. Choose the
smallest such triangle, say ΔABC, with integer lengths (BC) = (AB) = n, and (AC) = N,
n, N ∈ N. Now do the following origami: fold along a line passing through A so that B lies on
AC, giving rise to the point B on AC. The ‘crease’ in the paper is actually the angle bisector
AD of the angle ∠BAC.
A A
C n B C D B
THE REAL NUMBERS 5
In ΔCB D, ∠CB D = 90◦ , ∠B CD = 45◦ . So ΔCB D is an isosceles right triangle. We have
(CB ) = (B D) = (AC) − (AB ) = N − n ∈ N, while
√
2
1
has integer side lengths, and is smaller than ΔABC, contradicting the choice of ΔABC.
So there is no rational number q such that q2 = 2.
(1) Prove the Rational Zeros Theorem: Let c0 , c1 , · · · , cd be d ≥ 1 integers such that
c0 and cd are not zero. Let r = p/q where p, q are integers having no common factor
and such that q > 0. Suppose that r is a zero of the polynomial c0 + c1 x + · · · + cd xd .
Then q divides cd and p divides c0 .
√
(2) Show that 2 is irrational.
√
(3) Show that 3 6 is irrational.
Thus, we have seen that the elements of Q can be depicted on the number line, and that not
all the points on the number line belong to Q. We think of R as all the points on the number
line. As mentioned earlier, if we take out everything on the number line (the black points)
except for the rational numbers Q (the red points), then there will√
be holes among the rational
numbers (for example, there will be a missing black point where 2 lies on the number line).
We can think of the real numbers as ‘filling in’ these holes between the rational numbers.
We will say more about this when we make remarks about the construction of R. Right now,
we just have an intuitive picture of the set of real numbers as a bigger set than the rational
numbers, and we think of the real numbers as points on the number line. Admittedly, this is
certainly not a mathematical definition, and is extremely vague. In order to be precise, and to
do Calculus rigorously, we just can’t rely on this vague intuitive picture of the real numbers.
So we now turn to the precise properties of the real numbers that we are allowed to use in
1 Surds refer to irrational numbers that arise as the nth root of a natural number. The mathematician al-Khwarizmi
(around 820 AD) called irrational numbers ‘inaudible’, which was later translated to the Latin surdus for ‘mute’.
6 THE HOW AND WHY OF ONE VARIABLE CALCULUS
developing Calculus. While stating these properties, we will think of the set R as an (as yet)
undefined set containing Q which will satisfy the properties of
stipulated below.
It is a pertinent question if one can construct (if there really exists) such a set R satisfying
the above properties (1–3). The answer to this question is yes, but it is tedious. So in this
first introductory course, we will not worry ourselves too much with it. It is a bit like the
process of learning physics: typically one does not start with quantum mechanics and the
structure of an atom, but with the familiar realm of classical mechanics. To consider another
example, imagine how difficult it would be to learn a foreign language if one starts to painfully
memorise systematically all the rules of grammar first; instead a much more fruitful method
is to start practicing simple phrases, moving on to perhaps children’s comic books, listening
to pop music in that language, news, literature, and so on. Of course, along the way one picks
up grammar and a formal study can be done at leisure later resulting in better comprehension.
We will actually give some idea about the construction of the real numbers in Section 1.8.
Right now, we just accept on faith that the construction of R possessing the properties we are
about to learn can be done, and to have a concrete object in mind, we rely on our familiarity
with the number line to think of the real numbers when we study the properties (1), (2), (3)
listed above.
We also remark that property (3) (the Least Upper Bound Property) of R will turn out to be
crucial for doing Calculus. The properties (1), (2) are also possessed by the rational number
system Q, but we will see that (3) fails for Q.
called addition, which sends a pair of real numbers (x, y) to their sum x + y, and the other
operation is
· : R × R → R,
called multiplication, which sends a pair of real numbers (x, y) to their product x · y, and these
two operations satisfy certain laws, called the ‘field axioms’.2 The field axioms for R are
2 There are other number systems, for example, the rational numbers Q which also obey similar laws of arithmetic,
and so (Q, +, ·) is also deemed to be a field. So the word ‘field’ is invented to describe the situation that one has a
number system F with corresponding operations + and · which obey the usual laws of arithmetic, rather than listing
all of these laws.
THE REAL NUMBERS 7
listed below:
⎧
⎪
⎪ (F1) (Associativity) For all x, y, z ∈ R, x + (y + z) = (x + y) + z.
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪ For all x ∈ R, x + 0 = x = 0 + x.
⎨(F2) (Additive identity)
+ (F3) (Inverses) For all x ∈ R, there exists − x ∈ R
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪ such that x + (−x) = 0 = −x + x.
⎪
⎪
⎩(F4) (Commutativity) For all x, y ∈ R, x + y = y + x.
⎧
⎪
⎪ (F5) (Associativity) For all x, y, z ∈ R, x · (y · z) = (x · y) · z.
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪ (Multiplicative identity) 1 = 0 and for all x ∈ R, x · 1 = x = 1 · x.
⎨(F6)
· (F7) (Inverses) For all x ∈ R\{0}, there exists x−1 ∈ R
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪ such that x · x−1 = 1 = x−1 · x.
⎪
⎪
⎩(F8) (Commutativity) For all x, y ∈ R, x · y = y · x.
+, · (F9) (Distributivity) For all x, y, z ∈ R, x · (y + z) = x · y + x · z.
With these axioms, it is possible to prove the usual arithmetic manipulations we are accus-
tomed to. Here are a couple of examples.
Of course in this book, we will not do such careful justifications every time we need to manip-
ulate real numbers. We have listed the above laws to once and for all stipulate the laws of
arithmetic for real numbers that justify the usual calculational rules we are familiar with, so
that we know the source of it all. For example, the student may wish to try his/her hand at
producing a rigorous justification based on (F1) to (F9) of the following well known facts.
Exercise 1.3. (∗) Using the field axioms of R, prove the following:
(1) Additive inverses are unique.
(2) For all a ∈ R, (−1) · a = −a.
(3) (−1) · (−1) = 1.
8 THE HOW AND WHY OF ONE VARIABLE CALCULUS
Definition 1.1 (Positive numbers). The elements of P are called positive numbers. For real
numbers x, y, we say that
x > y if x − y ∈ P,
x < y if y − x ∈ P,
x ≥ y if x = y or x > y,
x ≤ y if x = y or x < y.
It is clear from (O2) that 0 is not a positive number. Also, from (O2) it follows that for real
numbers x, y, one and only one of the following statements is true:
1◦ x = y.
2◦ x > y.
3◦ x < y.
Why is this so? If x = y, then x − y = 0, and so by (O2), we have the mutually exclusive
possibilities x − y ∈ P or y − x = −(x − y) ∈ P happening, that is, either x > y or x < y.
All law, local and international, has been made by the most
advanced people, and must be guarded by them against the less
advanced. Each civilized nation has a police force to guard its
national law, but International Law has not yet progressed so far. Yet
whatever may have been the origins of the present war, the
Germans’ conduct of it has made them international outlaws, and
constituted the nations fighting them a police to maintain the law.
Whatever the time and sacrifice involved, whatever other nations
may be needed to strengthen the police force, the law must be
vindicated, or civilization must go backward generations, and build
the law up again.
That a union to develop and enforce International Law may result
from the present war, seems among the possible compensations of
the waste and misery. The world will have had enough of war, and
more than enough, to a degree never before concentrated in as brief
a period. In the early and long wars, men had not outgrown the
stolid conviction that war was the inevitable and normal condition of
the race; and at that stage of the race’s evolution, so it was. But
evolution has progressed, men’s—many men’s—ideas are different,
and during this unparalleled tragic absurdity, they are going to
become still more different, and at an unprecedented rate. Never
before did a nation go to war as England now has done, to vindicate,
enforce, and preserve what had been evolved of International Law.
The German barbarities have made all England’s allies warriors in
the same cause, and have opened the eyes of the world, as never
before, to its value, its dignity, and, the blood flowing for it is going
to add, its sacredness. To the seed planted at The Hague, this blood
will be a fertilizing stream, and a growth may be expected that will
be a shade and a defence to the nations.
EN CASSEROLE
Special to Our Readers
In this number, we have put the war articles last, giving them the
place of second emphasis, and at the cost of cutting into the
Casserole, because at the time the table of contents was made up,
we considered the topic of our first article, Free Speech, of more
consequence than any War possible among civilized nations. But we
did not then suppose that one of the nations we considered civilized
was capable of stamping on treaties, violating neutralities, dropping
unnotified bombs on cities, and, if late reports are true, guiding the
Turk in another assault on civilization.
Resistance to such infamies we regard as of more pressing
importance than even the main object to which our leading articles
have been heretofore devoted, namely, the elevation of the humbler
man. We even regard that as, in the long run, the most effective
agency toward Peace. But sometimes in emergencies, the long run
has to be disregarded. Thus, not the least of the bad effects of the
war is its diversion of effort from the social and political amelioration
to which, for a generation, the world has given a degree of interest
without precedent in all previous history. From this cause, where we
would have our peculiar function the saving one of a brake, even our
own humble efforts must be considerably diverted by an emergency
so overwhelming; and we know that our readers, despite their
inclination for the still air of delightful studies, can not fail to respond
to so general and poignant an interest.
Buzzing around this subject, one of our most valued contributors
writes: “Please don’t print a peace article. There are only two
possible kinds of peace in this world, while man is man: the peace of
exhaustion and the pax romana.”
How prophecy does rage on this subject—on both sides!
Which peace with each other did the chief European nations enjoy
from 1871 to 1914, and the English speaking nations from 1814 to
1914? And we seem abundantly justified in hoping that it may be
permanent.
“While man is man.” Which man—Homer’s,—butchering unarmed
foes whom he finds in bathing; or today’s,—arbitrating most of his
quarrels, and busying himself over schemes for the automatic
settlement of the rest? Any one who fails to recognize the change in
man, may well fail, especially at a time like this, to recognize the
increasing peace and aids to peace among the nations. Between
civilized peoples, war comes now mainly because of one decaying
institution—autocratic government, and of one vanishing human
peculiarity—the madness of the crowd—the readiness of men to do
in mass what they scorn to do as individuals—to get excited over
foolish causes, or no cause at all, and to find glory in doing at
wholesale, work which, at retail, they shrink from as robbery and
murder.
Academic Courtesy
A certain college professor was asked by a lawyer for technical
information needed in a property case. The professor spent half a
day in disentangling the material and putting it into practicable
shape. With it he presented a bill for $25.00.
Was this sensible or shocking?—business or betrayal? The lawyer,
who seems in no way to have begrudged the money, told the tale as
an instance of vulgar commercialism worming its ugly way into the
fair ethics of the academic profession. And with him doubtless most
college professors themselves would agree, even in the face of his
confession that for any scraps of legal information formally sought
by the professor a lawyer would charge a fee.
To a layman the case for the defence seems simple. Here is no
shining opportunity for the idealism of the scientist who, preferring
to give to humanity the fruit of his works, refuses to patent
discoveries made in the university laboratory. Nor is there in such an
instance any question of aid to a disinterested “seeker after truth.” A
professor of Greek will gravely spend several hours in answering a
village clergyman’s question about the New Testament “baptism.”
The historian himself will take the free hours of several days to make
out reading lists for a woman’s club. But why should one man who is
making his living give time and work freely to another man who is
going to use them to increase his earnings? The professor’s salary,
unadorned by inherited capital or wife’s dower or extra work, is not a
living wage. He has to endure the annual appeal to humanitarian
alumni to consider his needs, the reiterated disclosures of his poor
economies and poorer expenditures. Why should he not take from a
lawyer’s pocket, rather than from a “donor’s,” in return for desirable
goods, money which will pay part of his expenses to the next
meeting of that learned society before which he is to read an
unmarketable paper?
Why, indeed? we seem to hear the college professor echo. There is
no reason save that he likes learning without courtesy, as little as
religion without charity—and courtesy, like charity, makes no
exceptions.
Simplified Spelling
While Germany is fighting in disregard of International Law, and the
allies fighting in its defence, it is a good time to impress a very
powerful consideration for simplifying English spelling.
Probably the strongest reason why International Law has developed
so much more slowly than law in the separate nations, has been the
greater difficulty of the nations understanding each other, and this is
rapidly disappearing under increased facilities of intercommunication.
Apparently there is no agency in sight which would promote this as
much as an international language. Many considerations nominate
English for the place: not only do more people speak it already than
speak any other civilized language; but quite probably more people
not born to it, speak it. Of all civilized languages, it is by far the
simplest in its inflections and the richest in its vocabulary, and
contains most words already contained in other languages. As a
possible world-language, it far surpasses them all, except in the
difficult inconsistencies of its spelling; and many devoted men,
including virtually all the leading authorities, are now working hard
to remedy these, perhaps their strongest motive being, as it is that
of their most generous supporter, the interests of peace.
Death, 314.
Democracy in Education, 356.
Democratic individualism, 246-247.
Demos, 248.
Dickinson, Lowes, 384, 430.
Disfranchisement of Property, The. See Property.
Distribution, 245.
Domestic science, 189.
Dreams, 152.
Du Prel, 157.
Immigration, 45.
Immortality, 184-188, 311.
Industrial decentralization, 243-245.
I. W. W., 224, 225, 238.
International language, 443.
International law, 437-439.
Investments, Unsocial, 1
—new social conscience in reality a class conscience, 1-2
—excommunication of special property interests, 2-3
—instances of such excommunication, 3-4
—private ethical problems arising, 4-7
—Jane Addams’s solution, 5-6
—how we dispose of the saloon, 7-8
—unfit tenements, 8
—the loan shark, 9
—mistaken method of suppressing anti-social interests, and
consequences, 10-11
—the principle of compensation, 12
—its expediency, 13
—superior claim of expediency, 14
—public share in evils of anti-social interests, 14-15
—growth and change of majority opinion as to illegitimate
industries, 15
—liquor question, cold storage, artificial butter as instances,
15-17
—single tax argument, 17
—legislative evils, 17
—need of security of property, 18
—relation of security of human life to security of property, 18-
19
—rights of labor, 19-20
—justice of the principle of compensation, 20.
Is Socialism Coming? See Socialism.
Railway Junctions, 91
—fine phrase of R. L. Stevenson, 91
—Essex Junction and E. J. Phelps’s verses, 92
—pleasure to be got from places, 93
—picture of possible pleasure at Essex Junction, 93-94
—enjoying railway junctions, 94-95
—a Bavarian junction near Rothenburg, 95-96
—Bobadilla, Spain, 96-97
—Dol, France, 97-98
—Nevers and Pyrgos, 98-99
—true enjoyment of travel, 99-100
—American haste, 100
—anecdote of R. L. Stevenson, 101
—Thos. Browne, quoted, 101
—enjoyment of the present, 102
—anecdote of a wait at Basel, 102
—possibilities of adventure in the dullest places, 103.
Republic of Megaphon, The (the evils of the modern
newspaper shown by a Socratic dialogue), 248
—its apparent value and trifling cost, 249-251
—Nature of its news, 252
—its low price necessitates profits from advertising, 254
—its lowering of quality, 254-255
—its falsification of truth, 256
—its willingness to sell itself, 257
—its low taste and vulgar language, 257
—its vulgar advertising of worthless goods, 258
—its vulgarization of art, 258
—its immoral advertising, 259
—its flattery of the people and faultfinding with the few, 260
—its tendency to set class against class, 261
—its teaching of skepticism in religion, of baseness in leaders,
and selfishness in all men and consequent injury to the state,
262-263
—how the truth may be told and how the newspapers tell it,
264-265.
Rhodes, Cecil, 424, 425.
Rich, Minor Uses of the Middling, 104
—charges general and specific against the rich, 104
—historic view of wealth, 105
—newly rich, multimillionaires, and middling rich, 105-106
—character of the middling rich, 107
—honesty and virtue implied in moderate wealth, 108
—discipline, efficiency and good manners of the middling rich,
109
—strong position in comparison with the capitalist and the
wage-earner, 110
—usefulness of this class in conservation of civilization, 111
—usefulness on the lighter side of life, 112
—newspapers, 112-113
—poverty likely to decrease, 113
—socialism, personality of wealth, 113-114
—great fortunes, 114
—prospects, 115.
Rogers, Anna A., 267, 277.
Russell, Chas. Edw., 232.
Russia. See War.
Universities, 356.
University efficiency, 59.
Unpopular Review, 155, 206.
Unsocial Investments. See Investments.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com