Advanced Computing in Industrial Mathematics 13th Annual Meeting of The Bulgarian Section of SIAM December 18 20 2018 Sofia Bulgaria Revised 1st Edition Ivan Georgiev PDF Download
Advanced Computing in Industrial Mathematics 13th Annual Meeting of The Bulgarian Section of SIAM December 18 20 2018 Sofia Bulgaria Revised 1st Edition Ivan Georgiev PDF Download
https://textbookfull.com/product/soft-computing-systems-second-
international-conference-icscs-2018-kollam-india-
april-19-20-2018-revised-selected-papers-ivan-zelinka/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-high-performance-
computing-results-of-the-international-conference-on-high-
performance-computing-borovets-bulgaria-2019-ivan-dimov/
https://textbookfull.com/product/research-in-history-and-
philosophy-of-mathematics-the-cshpm-2017-annual-meeting-in-
toronto-ontario-maria-zack/
https://textbookfull.com/product/research-in-history-and-
philosophy-of-mathematics-the-cshpm-2015-annual-meeting-in-
washington-d-c-1st-edition-maria-zack/
https://textbookfull.com/product/world-women-in-
mathematics-2018-proceedings-of-the-first-world-meeting-for-
women-in-mathematics-wm-%c2%b2-carolina-araujo/
https://textbookfull.com/product/quantitative-psychology-83rd-
annual-meeting-of-the-psychometric-society-new-york-
ny-2018-marie-wiberg/
https://textbookfull.com/product/large-scale-scientific-
computing-11th-international-conference-lssc-2017-sozopol-
bulgaria-june-5-9-2017-revised-selected-papers-1st-edition-ivan-
Studies in Computational Intelligence 961
Ivan Georgiev
Hristo Kostadinov
Elena Lilkova Editors
Advanced
Computing
in Industrial
Mathematics
13th Annual Meeting of the Bulgarian
Section of SIAM, December 18–20, 2018,
Sofia, Bulgaria, Revised Selected Papers
Studies in Computational Intelligence
Volume 961
Series Editor
Janusz Kacprzyk, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
The series “Studies in Computational Intelligence” (SCI) publishes new develop-
ments and advances in the various areas of computational intelligence—quickly and
with a high quality. The intent is to cover the theory, applications, and design
methods of computational intelligence, as embedded in the fields of engineering,
computer science, physics and life sciences, as well as the methodologies behind
them. The series contains monographs, lecture notes and edited volumes in
computational intelligence spanning the areas of neural networks, connectionist
systems, genetic algorithms, evolutionary computation, artificial intelligence,
cellular automata, self-organizing systems, soft computing, fuzzy systems, and
hybrid intelligent systems. Of particular value to both the contributors and the
readership are the short publication timeframe and the world-wide distribution,
which enable both wide and rapid dissemination of research output.
Indexed by SCOPUS, DBLP, WTI Frankfurt eG, zbMATH, SCImago.
All books published in the series are submitted for consideration in Web of
Science.
Elena Lilkova
Editors
Advanced Computing
in Industrial Mathematics
13th Annual Meeting of the Bulgarian
Section of SIAM, December 18–20, 2018,
Sofia, Bulgaria, Revised Selected Papers
123
Editors
Ivan Georgiev Hristo Kostadinov
Institute of Information and Communication Institute of Mathematics and Informatics
Technologies and Institute of Mathematics Bulgarian Academy of Science
and Informatics Sofia, Bulgaria
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Sofia, Bulgaria
Elena Lilkova
Institute of Information
and Communication Technologies
Bulgarian Academy of Science
Sofia, Bulgaria
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
The 13th Annual Meeting of the Bulgarian Section of the Society for Industrial and
Applied Mathematics (BGSIAM) was held in Sofia, December 18–20, 2018. The
section was formed in 2007 with the purpose to promote and support the application
of mathematics to science, engineering, and technology in Bulgaria.
The goals of BGSIAM follow and creatively develop the general goals of SIAM
as follows:
• To advance the application of mathematics and computational science to
engineering, industry, science, and society;
• To promote research that will lead to effective new mathematical and compu-
tational methods and techniques for science, engineering, industry, and society;
• To provide media for the exchange of information and ideas among mathe-
maticians, engineers, and scientists.
During the BGSIAM’18 conference, a wide range of problems concerning recent
achievements in the field of industrial and applied mathematics were presented and
discussed. The meeting provided a forum for exchange of ideas between scientists,
who develop and study mathematical methods and algorithms, and researchers, who
apply them for solving real-life problems.
Among the topics of interest are mathematical physics, numerical analysis,
high-performance computing, optimization and control, mathematical biology
stochastic modeling, machine learning, digitization and imaging, big data, and
advanced computing in environmental, biomedical, and engineering applications.
The invited speakers were:
• Owe Axelsson (Czech Academy of Sciences), An inner-product free iteration
method for an equation of motion and a bound-constrained optimal control PDE
problem
• Mauro Ballicchia (Polytechnic University of Marche, Italy), Recent advances in
the Wigner signed particles: theory and applications
• Vesselin Iossifov (University of Applied Sciences Berlin, Germany),
Programming Techniques for Energy-efficient Software
v
vi Preface
vii
viii Contents
1 Introduction
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have had worldwide attention in the last years,
especially with the development of smart sensors and IoT technology. The new
smart sensors are small, and require less processing and computing resources,
and are relatively inexpensive. The smart sensors grouped in clusters can sense,
measure, integrate the measured data and transmit the sensed data to the con-
trol center. The trend towards wireless communication and IoT technology is
increasingly changing electronic devices in every aspect of life [1,3,19]. A WSN
is a special type of wireless network composed of a number of nodes that are
equipped with different sensors. This network type has been supported by tech-
nological advances in low-power wireless communications. A WSN is built by
distributed autonomous sensors that cooperatively monitor the environmental
conditions. To reduce the WSN design cost very offten are used modeling tools
as Generalized Nets (GN) [20] or industrial modelers as OPNET. In addition to
one or more sensors, each node in a sensor network is equipped with a micro-
controller, program logic, radio transceiver or other wireless communications
devices, and an energy source, usually based on battery. The size of the sensor
nodes results in corresponding resources such as energy, memory, computational
speed, and bandwidth [2]. In general, a WSN is composed of hundreds or even
thousands of small, low cost, low power wireless sensor nodes. These nodes are
deployed to register physical phenomena and usually communicate with each
other through wireless communication channels. The design of the most wireless
sensor networks is based mainly on star or cluster topology [4] that organizes
and maintains a group of wireless sensors with local integration data capability.
In the current research is considered a cluster based topology of WSN. Although
the existing wireless network technologies are capable of constructing of large
sensor networks, the design and use of sensor networks to monitor stationary or
mobile objects such as buildings, cars, and even personal hand-held devices can
be further simplified to reduce power consumption and to increase the device’s
shelf life. The simplest approach for communication in wireless sensor networks
is the direct transmission, in which each node transmits its own data directly to
the control center or to the cluster head. If the base station is far away, the cost
of sending data directly to that station will become too large, and the nodes will
consume their energy resources quickly. WSNs are now used in many industrial
and civilian application areas, including industrial process monitoring and con-
trol, machine health monitoring, environment, and habitat monitoring, health-
care applications, home automation, traffic control, and scientific exploration in
dangerous environments [10,16]. In all cases, however, the communication effi-
ciency and energy saving are one of the most important issues in the network.
The communication protocol specifies how wireless sensor nodes communicate
with each other, disseminating information that enables them to select the appro-
priate communication route between any two nodes in the WSN [17]. The choice
of route is executed via routing algorithms. Each router has a priori knowledge
of only the networks that are directly attached to it. A routing protocol shares
this information first with its immediate neighbors and then throughout the
network [18]. In this way, the routers can gain knowledge of the topology of the
network. Routing protocols designed for data transfer in traditional ad hoc net-
works cannot be used with sensor networks. This is because sensor nodes have
limited battery power and because data transmission or reception consumes more
power consumption than sensor nodes do sensing and computation operations.
Therefore, it is desirable to conserve the energy of the nodes in the network while
routing query responses back to the sink node.
2 Related Works
Due to the specific problems in multihop based WSN, the design of the com-
munication protocols poses many new challenges, and a lot of work has been
done in this area. During the last years, several papers have proposed more
and more efficient algorithms for wireless sensor based communication proto-
cols [5–7]. For example [6] proposes an adaptive routing protocol for fixed place
applications, using their IP addressing scheme in WSNs. The research of [7] pro-
poses an analytical model for a reliable real-time degree in multihop WSNs. The
real-time degree represents the amount of data that can be transmitted from
any source node to its destination node. The research of Al-Karaki [9] presents a
Design of a Multi-objective Optimization Model 3
3 WSN Modeling
order to connect to other nodes or to the CH. However, physically the radio
signal cannot reach long distances because of energy and frequency limitations.
Because the wireless sensors are battery powered, they also have energy limita-
tions. Therefore, each sensor is on standby in the sleep mode, which makes it
possible to minimize energy consumption. When a communication event occurs,
the sensor enters the wake-up mode and receives or transmits information. Then,
it searches for CH with the aim of sending information to the control center.
The sensor node must reach the CH. In view of the above working characteris-
tics of the network, we have developed our model of WSN under the following
assumptions:
– The location of the CH does not change during the process of collecting data
from the sensor nodes in the cluster.
– The sensor nodes GPS coordinates are fixed.
– Each sensor node has energy limitations.
– The Cluster Head (CH) has not any energy limitations.
– Every sensor node as part of the cluster has a direct connection with CH.
M AX W Ti−begin − W Ti−current (2)
i∈N,i=n i∈N,i=n
6 A. Alexandrov and V. Monov
where:
Ei−begin - initial amount of energy of node i, for all i ∈ N ;
Ei−current - current energy of node for all i ∈ N ;
W Ti−begin - initial amount of work time of node i, for all i, j ∈ N ;
W Ti−current - current work time capacity of node for all i N ;
The combined objective function consisting of Eq. (1) and (2) is based of a
multi-objective optimization by looking for a minimum between the sum of the
amounts of energy used by the nodes and the sum of amounts of work time of
every sensor node (his shelf life). The restriction (3)
can be replaced with the Eq. (4) if the node energy is below specified limit. In
this case, the node j will route the data through the neighbor node i instead of
direct connection to the CH.
Ei−begin − (Ecurrent−it + Ei−active + din .Ei−send ) = 0 (6)
i∈N,i=n i∈N,i=n
W Tbegin − (W Tcurrent−it + Ti−active + din .Ti−send ) = 0 (7)
i∈N,i=n i∈N,i=n
Constraint (3) indicates that there must be flow from node i and into CH
node n. Constraint (3) illustrates the limit on the transmission distance and can
be replaced with (4) if the amount of current energy Ei−current is below the
limit. Constraint (5) defines the remaining energy of the nodes. The remaining
energy of a node is equal to the initial energy minus the active state (eactive
) energy and the transmission energy tsend associated with the nodes in the
cluster. The remaining shelf life of a node is equal to the initial time resource
of the node minus the active and transmission periods. The objective function
of the equations is almost linear and depend on the amount of the transmission
energy and the amount of node transmission periods as part of all the active
energy and active periods.
The notation is as follows:
i, j, k - indices of node (i, j, k = 1, 2, 3, ........, N )
N - the number of all the nodes (i, j, k ∈ N )
n - cluster head (CH) node index (n ∈ N )
t - index of periods (t ∈ T )
T - set of transmission periods (t ∈ T )
din - distance from node i to CHn ;
Design of a Multi-objective Optimization Model 7
4 Conclusions
This paper considered a wireless sensor network mathematical design under
resource restrictions. We developed an improved mathematical model for multi-
objective optimization of a wireless sensor network with cluster topology by
simultaneously considering different size node transmission periods and energy
limits of the sensor nodes. The proposed model can be used in real situations in
designing of battery-powered wireless sensor networks. The developed model can
also be used in other sensor networks design under various resource restrictions.
Even though the current mathematical model does not require significant compu-
tation time, much more time may be needed for large-scale WSNs. The further
research will be focused on some related simulation studies of the model and
development of other multi-objective optimization techniques including addi-
tional restrictions, related to QoS and the existing adaptive routing algorithms
as SLTP protocol implemented in real WSN.
References
1. Pottie, G.J., Kaiser, W.J.: Wireless integrated network sensors. Commun. ACM
43(5), 5158 (2000)
Design of a Multi-objective Optimization Model 9
1 Introduction
are some more specific cases where centering can be useful, e.g. the intercept has no
effect on the collinearity of the other variables if the independent variables are centered
(Belsley 1980). If you want to know more about the effects of centering, see (Dalal and
Zickar 2012, Robinson and Schumaker 2009, Jaccard 1990). All that we mention about
centering induces the need to investigate what is happening when we center the inde-
pendent variables before applying the Cross-validated sequentially constructed multiple
regression.
3. We find k while minimizing the RMSECV (k) for Model 1 with Zi, j (k) that replaces
Xi and X j (we explain in more details further in the paper);
4. Back to Step 1.
The procedure ends when we have achieved absolute t-values over a chosen threshold
for all of the derived model variables or when the model variables are reduced to a
predefined percentage from their initial number. Many other criteria are possible.
We can note that on each iteration of the algorithm the variables are reduced by 1,
and this reduction is obtained by the optimization of the RMSECV applied on Step 3.
By cross-validating some of the estimates we aim to achieve estimates that are better
estimated, and will improve the performance of the model for out-of-sample observa-
tions. Once the model is estimated, if we want, we can express the model by the initial
predictors from the obtained components.
About the procedures in Step 3, for each two chosen predictors (or already obtained
components) Xi and X j , we construct component Z(k) = Xi + k ∗ X j (assuming |αi | >
|α j |). Then we are minimizing:
∑ni=1 εi2 (k) a j + τσ j a j − τσ j
min RMSECV (k) = min , k∈( , ),
k k n ai − τσi ai + τσi
τ > 0, ai = ±τσi , (4)
where τ > 0 is a number between 1 and 6, lets say 4; n is the number of obser-
vations; α j , αi are estimated coefficients from Model 1; σi and σ j are the stan-
dard errors of αi and α j ; εi (k) = Y (i) − fi (k) is the error from the i-th observation
from the model fi (k). fi (k) is the multiple regression model with input variables
Z(k), X1 , X2 , . . . , Xi−1 , Xi+1 , . . . , X j−1 , X j+1 , . . . , Xn (we replace the predictors with the
constructed components) estimated with the whole data set except the i-th observation.
To find the optimum k, we should use a branch-and-bound algorithm (see Jiao 2013,
α
Norkin 1998, Clark and Wood 1966) to search around k0 = αij in the defined interval
(if we choose k0 we will obtain the same result as if we have used the estimates from
the multiple regression). The problem is that no matter how efficient is the implemented
algorithm on each iteration, i.e. for any chosen k, we must calculate m regressions fi (k),
m is the number of observations, in order to calculate RMSECV (k). The good thing is
that we can avoid all of the estimates of fi (k) because it is known that the out-of-
sample residuals εi , i = 1, . . . , n used in the RMSECV measure can be computed by the
following formula:
ξ̂i
εi = , i = 1, . . . , m, (5)
1 − hi
where ξ̂i is the error of the i-th observation for model Y (k) = α0 + α ∗ Z(k) + α1 ∗ X1 +
α2 ∗ X2 + . . . + αi−1 ∗ Xi−1 + αi+1 ∗ Xi+1 + . . . + α j−1 ∗ X j−1 + α j+1 ∗ X j+1 + . . . + αn Xn ,
m is the number of observations, and hi,i is the i-th element from the diagonal of the hat
matrix H = X(X t X)−1 X t , where X is the design matrix, X t is its transposed matrix.
The aim of this work is to investigate what will be the difference if we apply the
proposed algorithm for the centered model from (2). On a first glance, there will be no
difference, we just center the predictors and applied the model. The problem is that if
Cross-Validated Sequentially Constructed Multiple Regression 13
we do this, it will cause the cross-validation procedure to be invalid one. While cross-
validating, we assume that we do not know anything about the out-of-sample obser-
vations. Thus, each time when we choose an out-of sample observation, we should
recenter the predictors using the corresponding means that are estimated without this
observation. As a consequence, we cannot use (5) to compute RMSECV (k) fast. If we
use it anyway, it will be equivalent to centering the predictors once, and ignoring any
recentering.
The centered version of the Cross-validated sequentially constructed multiple
regression follows the same algorithm as the non-centered one. The difference is in
the complication around the procedure for finding the optimal k for a chosen compo-
nent Z c (k) = Xic + k ∗ X jc . For simplicity, we assume that this is the first component that
we are obtaining from the algorithm. We search for the optimal k while minimizing:
∑ni=1 (εic (k))2 aj + τσ j aj − τσ j
min RMSECVc (k) = min , k∈( , ),
k k n ai − τσi ai + τσi
τ > 0, ai = ±τσi , (6)
where α j , αi , and their corresponding σ j , σi are from Model 2, and εic (k) = Y (i)− fic (k)
is the error from the i-th observation from the model fic (k). The functions fic (k) have
the following form:
fic (k) = αi,0 + αi ∗ Zic (k) + αi,1 ∗ (X1 − μi,1 ) + αi,2 ∗ (X2 − μi,2 ) + . . .
+ αi,i−1 ∗ (Xi−1 − μi,i−1 ) + αi,i+1 ∗ (Xi+1 − μi,i+1 ) + . . . + αi, j−1 ∗ (X j−1 − μi, j−1 )+
+ αi, j+1 ∗ (X j+1 − μi, j+1 ) + . . . + αi,n ∗ (Xn − μi,n ),
where Zic (k) is Z c (k) centered without taking into account the i-th observation, μi, j , i −
f ixed, j = 1, . . . , n are the corresponding sample means estimated without the i-th obser-
vation. Now, we note that not only we cannot use the formula from (5) for a fast com-
putation of RMSECV (k) in (6), but there are additional computations while compared
with the non-centered method if we do not use that formula.
Proof. We will start with the fact that the regression model from Eq. 1 and its centered
version with centered X1 , . . . , Xk are identical in the sense that their model residuals are
the same. Moreover, their model coefficients are the same. The only difference is in the
intercept term. This fact is known from the regression analysis theory, a proof can be
seen in (Sen and Srivastava 1990, pp. 42–43).
We have the multiple regression problem from Eq. 1. We start the procedure for
obtaining components for the both models. Let us consider for simplicity that we have
chosen to combine variables X1 and X2 into a component Z(k) = X1 + k.X2 . While
14 S. Angelov and E. Stoimenova
centering the variables X1 , . . . , Xk the correlations between them will not be changed.
Thus, we will choose again X1 and X2 as building block for the first component for the
centered model case. If the centered version of X1 and X2 are X1c and X2c then from the
way we define the functional form of a component and the fact that the centered model
has the same coefficients as the non-centered one, we conclude that the component
Z c (kc ) from X1c and X2c has the same form as Z(k), i.e., Zc (k) = X1c + kc .X2c . Moreover,
the starting point k0 for the estimation of k is the same for the two components Z(k) and
Zc (k). We will define with k∗ the optimum k which will participate as the coefficient
in the formula for Z(k), and we will define with kc∗ the optimum kc in the formula for
Zc (kc ). Now, if we prove that k∗ and kc∗ coincide then Z(k∗ ) and Zc (kc∗ ) will be formed
by the same formula.
To find the optimum k for Z(k) we need to minimize RMSECV (k), to find the opti-
mum kc for Zc (kc ) we need to minimize RMSECVc (kc ). Both of this functions consist of
out-of-sample model errors. Let us observe one of these errors ε fi,k from RMSECV (k)
and its corresponding one ε fi,k c from RMSECVc (kc ). These two errors are obtained from
c
the i-th observation using models fi,k and fi,k c . The regression f has model variables
c i,k
Z(k), X3 , . . . , Xk , the regression fi,kc has model variables Zc (k), X3c , . . . , Xkc . We start the
c
optimization procedures for k and kc from one and the same point k0 , so we will observe
k and kc like one variable k. For each k and for each i fi,k c is the centered model of f
i,k
c c
because X3 , . . . , Xk are the centered versions of X3 , . . . , Xk (centered without considering
the i-th observation) and Zc (k) is the centered version of Z(k). As a consequence, for
a fixed k and i the out-of-sample i-th model error will be the same for the both mod-
els. Then for each k RMSECV (k) = RMSECVc (k). This means that the minimum of
RMSECV (k) will be reached in the same point k∗ like the minimum of RMSECVc (kc ).
Then the derived components are Z = X1 + k∗ .X2 and Zc (kc ) = X1c + k∗ .X2c , i.e., they
have the same functional form.
Following the same logic we can continue to derive components for the centered
and non-centered models and they will have the same functional form.
3 Summary
Acknowledgements. The work of E.S. was supported by the National Science Fund of Bulgaria
under Grant KP-06-N32/8.
References
Angelov, S., Stoimenova, E.: Cross-validated sequentially constructed multiple regression. In:
Georgiev, K., Todorov, M., Georgiev, I. (eds.) Advanced Computing in Industrial Mathematics,
BGSIAM 2017. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 793. Springer, Cham (2019)
Sen, A., Srivastava, M.: Regression Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Springer, New
York (1990)
Aiken, L., West, S.: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Thousand
Oaks (1991)
Dalal, D., Zickar, M.: Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated
multiple regression and polynomial regression. SAGE J. 15(3), 339–362 (2012)
Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, R.: The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between
continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behav. Res. 25(4), 467–478 (1990)
Robinson, C., Schumaker, R.: Interaction effects: centering, variance inflation factor, and inter-
pretation issues. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints 35(1), 6–11 (2009)
Belsley, D., Kuh, E., Welsch, R.: Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and
Sources of Collinearity. Wiley, New York (1980)
Alin, A.: Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2(3), 370–374 (2010)
Lin, F.: Solving multicollinearity in the process of fitting regression model using the nested esti-
mate procedure. Qual. Quant. 42(3), 417–426 (2008)
Paul, R.: Multicollinearity: Causes, Effects and Remedies. IASRI, New Delhi (2006)
Picard, R., Cook, R.: Cross-validation of regression models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79(387), 575–
583 (1984)
Browne, M.: Cross-validation methods. J. Math. Psychol. 44(1), 108–132 (2000)
Hawkins, D., Basak, S., Mills, D.: Assessing model fit by cross-validation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput.
Sci. 43(2), 579–586 (2003)
Clark, T.: Can out-of-sample forecast comparisons help prevent overfitting? J. Forecast. 23(2),
115–139 (2004)
Steyerberg, E.: Overfitting and optimism in prediction models. In: Clinical Prediction Models,
pp. 83–100. Springer, New York (2009)
Lawler, E., Wood, D.: Branch-and-bound methods: a survey. Oper. Res. 14(4), 699–719 (1966)
Norkin, V., Pflug, G., Ruszczyński, A.: A branch and bound method for stochastic global opti-
mization. Math. Program. 83(1–3), 425–450 (1998)
Jiao, H., Wang, Z., Chen, Y.: Global optimization algorithm for sum of generalized polynomial
ratios problem. Appl. Math. Model. 37(1–2), 187–197 (2013)
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
West. These people belonged to the outstandingly non-conformist
type. They were sufficiently independent—contemptuous, one might
say—of established customs and institutions to be willing, with what
ignorance or awkwardness soever, to bring about changes, some of
which were sadly needed. Religiously they were apt to be come-
outers. It was largely among this class that were recruited the
Millerites, Millennialists, and original Latter Day Saints, together with
many other minor sects and factions. In politics, when all orthodox
New England was Whig, they were mainly Democratic; many,
however, backed the program of Nativism; in the person of John
Brown they exemplified the principle of direct action as applied to
slavery. The social innovator, the medical quack, and the political
demagogue found among them welcome and encouragement,
sometimes to the temporary distress of society, often to its ultimate
benefit. Not unlike the original Puritans who represented “the
dissidence of dissent and the protestantism of the protestant
religion,”[26] they constituted a dynamic social element although
wanting in the intellectual and religious training, the political morale,
and perhaps the heroism which distinguished the original planters of
Massachusetts Bay. They had the spirit of the revolutionary New
Englanders, who were described, not inaptly, as “hard, stubborn,
and indomitably intractable.” They were the backbone of Shays’s
rebellion. In many ways they illustrate the qualities which, at various
times in our later history, have served as the fulcrum of revolutionary
change.
Dwight’s foresters were merely the extreme manifestation, the
caricature, of a much larger class of heady, self sufficient,
opinionated, and troublesome persons who equally with the sober,
church going, instructed, conformist type were the product of New
England conditions. The cords of restraint were drawn so taut in the
parishes and towns, that the person who was determinedly
“different” was compelled to break them and become a kind of social
pariah in order to gain the freedom his soul craved. It was not an
accident that so large a proportion of that class went to the frontier.
They found there a less rigorous church discipline, freedom from
taxes for the support of the established church, and a more flexible
state of society in the midst of which they might hope to function. In
western Massachusetts and Connecticut, in Vermont, New
Hampshire, and Maine, they were numerous at the opening of the
National period. Soon large numbers emigrated to western New
York, to northern Pennsylvania, to Ohio, thence throughout the
West. They made up an appreciable part of the thronging Yankee
immigration which seized upon Wisconsin’s prairies and oak
openings between 1835 and 1850, and their presence has left its
impress upon our social history. Still the experiences of older
frontiers, such as western New York, had already modified the type.
When all necessary deductions have been made, however, the
church remained equally with the school a dominant note in the
Yankee’s social landscape. His “meeting house,” not infrequently in
New England a gem of ecclesiastical architecture, fulfilled his artistic
ideal; the congregation was the “household of faith” which claimed
his undeviating loyalty; the pastor was “guest and philosopher” in his
home whenever he chose to honor it with his presence. To men and
women alike, attendance upon the church services was the principal
Sabbath day duty and the chief physical and mental diversion of the
whole week. It was an old custom to linger after the morning
sermon for a social chat either in the church yard, when the weather
permitted, or else at a near-by tavern; and while the talk was
ostensibly about the sermon, gossip, bits of practical information,
and even a shy kind of love making were often interwoven, tending
to make this a genuine community social hour.
The tradition that the minister must be a man of learning was of
incalculable social importance. His advice was called for under every
conceivable circumstance of individual and community need. He
assisted about the employment of schoolmasters and was the
unofficial supervisor of the school. He enjoined upon negligent
parents the duty of sending their children, and he had an eye for the
promising boys—lads o’pairts, as the Scotch say—whom he
encouraged to prepare for professional life. He fitted boys to enter
the academy and sometimes tutored college students. In the rural
parish the minister occupied the church glebe, which made him a
farmer with the rest. He was apt to read more widely and closely in
the agricultural press, or in books on husbandry, than his neighbors,
thereby gaining the right to offer practical suggestions about many
everyday matters. Some ministers were writers for agricultural
journals. Many contributed to local newspapers items of news or
discussions of public questions in which their parishioners were
interested with themselves.
The home missionary idea was inherent in the New England system
both as respects religion and education. Older, better established
communities always felt some responsibility for the newer. Since
settlement proceeded largely by the method of planting new
townships of which the raw land was purchased by companies from
the colonial and state governments, it was possible for the larger
community to give an impetus to religion and education under the
terms of township grants. This was accomplished by reserving in
each grant three shares of the land—“one for the first settled
minister, one for the ministry forever, and one for the school.” Other
grants of raw land were made for the support of academies. Here
we have the origin of the system of land grants in aid both of the
common schools and of state universities, in the western states. The
grants for religion necessarily were discontinued after the adoption
of the national constitution.[27]
The religious unity established by the Puritans, and maintained for a
time by the simple method of rigorously excluding those holding
peculiar doctrines, gave way to considerable diversity in the late
eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Episcopalianism made
some progress in the older settlements, and Unitarianism created a
great upheaval, while toward the frontiers the Methodists and
Baptists flourished more and more. These several elements, by
1820, were powerful enough politically to secure the abolition of the
ancient tax for the support of the established (Congregational or
Presbyterian) church—a tax which had long caused ill feeling
between West and East, and no doubt had contributed to the growth
of dissenting churches. These frontier churches had the
characteristics of the frontier populations. Their ministers were less
learned, their morale less exacting, their religion less formal and
ritualistic, their ordinances less regularly and habitually enforced. But
there was an emotionalism which in a measure compensated for
defects of training, for looseness of habit and negligence in the
practice of religion. In a word, the camp meeting type of Christianity
prevailed widely along the frontier, and that type entered Wisconsin
Territory with the numerous Methodist and Baptist settlers from New
York and New England. As early as August, 1838, such a camp
meeting was held under Methodist leadership in the woods near
Racine; it was attended by hundreds of pioneer families drawn from
the sparsely settled neighborhoods for many miles around. Its
appointments were of the typical frontier kind, though one would
expect less boisterousness in the manifestations of emotion among
those people than seems to have accompanied similar gatherings in
the Southwest.[28]
The stated religious services in early Wisconsin, as in every frontier
region, were apt to be less frequent than in older communities.
Ministers were too few in number and neighborhoods too
impecunious to justify each locality in supporting a minister. The
circuit riding custom prevailed generally among all denominations.
One preacher traveled, on foot, six hundred miles, making the round
in six weeks. Each group of churches also had its conferences, which
were occasions for planning missionary effort, for unitedly attacking
special religious or social abuses, and for promoting constructive
community effort. The ablest speakers addressed such gatherings;
the membership of the churches concerned and others attended, in
addition to the delegates; and important religious, social, or moral
results sometimes flowed from them.
Another peculiar Yankee institution allied at once to the school and
the church, was the lyceum or local coöperative organization for
bringing lecturers to the community. The settlements in southeastern
Wisconsin had their lyceums at an early date, and many
distinguished public men from the East had occasion to visit this new
Yankeeland in the capacity of lecturer. Among them were Horace
Greeley, Bayard Taylor, and James Russell Lowell.
Reform movements, however, though usually receiving valuable aid
from churches, lyceums, mechanics’ institutes, and other permanent
organizations of men for public discussion, had a way of creating
special organizations to propagate themselves. That was true of the
temperance movement, which by the time of the Yankee
immigration into Wisconsin was under vigorous headway. Beginning,
in serious form, about 1820, the intervening years witnessed the
creation of hundreds of local temperance societies in New England
and New York, and the federation of these societies into state
societies. These central organizations stimulated the movement by
sending out lecturers, conducting a newspaper propaganda, and
issuing special publications. Some of their tracts are said to have
been scattered “like the leaves of autumn,” all over New England and
New York.
One of these tracts affected the social history of Wisconsin very
directly. It is known, traditionally, as “The Ox Discourse,” because it
was based on Exodus 21:28-29: “If an ox gore a man or woman,
that they die: then the ox shall be surely stoned, and his flesh shall
not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be quit. But if the ox
were wont to push with his horn in time past, and it hath been
testified to his owner, and he hath not kept him in, but that he hath
killed a man or a woman; the ox shall be stoned, and his owner also
shall be put to death.” The sermon on this text produced a great
sensation and gained many new adherents to the temperance cause.
Among these were two brothers, Samuel F. and Henry Phoenix, who
were storekeepers in a New York village and sold much whisky. They
publicly destroyed all the liquor they had on hand and became
crusaders in the temperance cause. In the spring of 1836 Colonel
Samuel F. Phoenix selected in Wisconsin a “Temperance Colony
claim,” on which he settled that summer. Then he rode to Belmont
and induced the first territorial legislature to set off from Milwaukee
County a county to be known as Walworth, in honor of the
chancellor of the state of New York, who was a noted temperance
leader. He named the village begun by him Delavan, in honor of E.
C. Delavan, pioneer temperance editor and at that time chairman of
the executive committee of the New York State Temperance Society.
Colonel Phoenix lectured on temperance, helped to organize early
temperance societies, rebuked his neighbors—especially the New
Yorkers—for employing whisky at raisings, and, before his death in
1840, had succeeded in giving a powerful impulse to the movement
in southeastern Wisconsin.
Another dramatic figure in early temperance annals was Charles M.
Goodsell, who in 1838 settled at Lake Geneva and built the first mill
operated in Walworth County. He was of Connecticut birth, and his
father owned and managed, among other properties, a whisky
distillery. Goodsell, however, when he came west from New York
State, was a most determined opponent of the traffic in intoxicants.
Soon after opening his mill a local company erected in Lake Geneva
a distillery for making corn whisky. Goodsell warned them, he says,
not to expect him to grind their grain and they installed a grinding
apparatus of their own. But, their machinery proving inadequate,
they finally sent a grist of corn to Goodsell’s mill, demanding, as
under the law they had a right to do, that it be “ground in turn.”
Goodsell refused, thereby producing a tense situation, for the
pioneer farmers looked to the distillery as a cash market for their
grain. Finally, the distillers brought suit, won a verdict, and Goodsell
appealed. But meantime, he rode to Madison, where the legislature
was sitting, and procured the adoption of an amendment to the law
regulating milling, to the effect: “Nothing in this section contained
shall be construed to compel the owners or occupiers of mills to
grind for distilling, or for sale or merchant work.” This proviso,
adopted in 1841, remained a feature of the statute for many years.
[29]
They were not all saints, these Germans, and in the matter of
personal morality the Prussians particularly seem in those days to
have deserved much of the criticism directed against them.[44]
However, it is not necessary to regard even the Prussians as more
lax than most other continentals, and their character is always
explainable as a vulgarized aping of the low if gilded immoralities of
court and aristocracy. Matters of this sort do not lend themselves
readily to statistical inquiry. But it can hardly be doubted that in
France, Prussia, Austria, or any other country of continental Europe
the private morals of the common people were better on the whole
than those of the upper classes. In America, where immigrants from
those countries came into contact with a self-governing people of
simple habits and prevailingly high ideals of personal conduct,
though with numerous individual divergences from the type, sharp
attention was bound to be directed to this feature in the character of
foreigners, and the Germans attracted their full share of suspicion
and disfavor from the stricter sort of Americans.
Such suspicions were heightened by certain social customs of the
Germans to which Americans reacted adversely. Sunday
amusements were all but universal among them. Travelers in
Germany dwell upon the gaiety observed in the villages, or in the
city parks and the beer gardens, the distinctive costumes of different
localities lending color and interest to the scenes. Music was
cultivated in every German community; all Germans could sing and a
large proportion could perform on musical instruments. One was “as
certain to see a violin as a blackboard in every schoolroom.”[45]
Wherever Germans gathered together—and Sunday, since it was the
weekly holiday, was their day for assembling—there was singing and
dancing, usually accompanied by the drinking of beer or wine to
stimulate hilarity. This drinking was not necessarily excessive,
because most Germans were moderate in their appetites for alcohol,
some were unable to spend much, and all were economical
(sparsam). The dances differed from those favored in this country,
being mainly “round dances,” and the standards of decorum in the
relations of the sexes were different also. No wonder that, when
German families settled in groups near our own people, Yankee
fathers and mothers often shook their heads doubtfully in
contemplating the influence upon their children of these unfamiliar
social customs.
It is probable that the vigor with which among this resilient people
amusements were carried on had a definite relation to the intensity,
monotony, and sordidness of the labor from which they were a
recoil. At all events, with more leisure on week days and an
opportunity to do his work under pleasanter conditions, the German
readily adapted himself to a type of relaxation which was less
boisterous and more genteel. His work and his living being what
they were, it is doubtful if anything better in the form of
amusements could have been expected of him. Travelers from
England and America, on their visits to Germany, were impressed
with the wholesomeness of the Sunday picnics, the rambles through
the forests, the frolics on the village greens and in the parks
adjacent to the towns and cities.[46]
With all his sociability, joviality, and occasional levity, the German
was not devoid of an element of austerity. This was one secret of his
ability to achieve. Whatever the work might be, he settled himself to
its performance with a grim determination expressive of century-
long training. The mechanic, from his apprentice years, was
habituated to long hours of unremitting but improving toil. The
farmer (bauer) was a traditional daylight-saver and a night-worker
besides, such excessive labor being compulsory under the system of
serfdom, when the peasant’s time was levied upon to a very large
extent by the lord. The German schools inculcated similar habits of
relentless application to the work in hand, and even the government
bureaus, under rigorous task-masters like old Friedrich Wilhelm and
his son Frederick the Great, enforced compliance with the ideal of a
patient, steady “grind” which not inaptly typified the German in the
eyes of other peoples. The German often performed less work in the
time consumed than an alert Yankee would have performed in a
shorter day; his tools and implements were generally awkward and
inefficacious; even in scholarship he not infrequently took the long
way around to reach his goal—but he usually reached it because he
had no notion of turning back or of stopping at a halfway point on
his job. Persistent rather than brilliant, more industrious than
inventive, the German toiled on, content if he always had something
to show for his labor. The contrast, in that generation, between the
German at work and the German at play is the contrast between a
man governed by an intense purpose to accomplish a given task,
whether interesting or not, and the same man intent on
accomplishing nothing with every physical, intellectual, and
emotional evidence of enjoying the process. Some men carry into
their play the morale which governs them in their work; others
import into their work the spirit of their play. In the case of the mid-
nineteenth century German the two aspects of his existence, work
and play, differed in spirit quite as much as in content.
The Germans had their Puritan sects, like the Moravians and other
pietists, whose attitude was distinctly other-worldly, to whom play
was a sedate if not a solemn activity. Such people disapproved of
dancing and beer drinking Germans quite as heartily as of profane
whiskey drinking and quarrelsome Americans or Irish. Individuals
and colonies of the pietistic classes passed into the emigrations, and
thus Wisconsin’s German population contained most of the elements
to be found at the same time in the German states. This illustrates
one difficulty in generalizing about social characteristics; there are so
many exceptions to be noted that the generalization loses much of
its validity.
Craftsmanship was a prevalent accomplishment among the Germans
of the early emigration. Every shipload of emigrants of which we
have a social analysis had a large proportion of craftsmen, who were
either established members of the city and village industrial class, or
else belonged to the peasantry and had learned a craft in order to
improve their status. Trades were learned exclusively under the
apprenticeship system, the candidate usually living in the master’s
home and giving service at the master’s will. When he reached the
journeyman stage he was privileged to find work for himself, a quest
which though usually fruitful in educational results often proved
disappointing from a monetary point of view. In those cases the
journeyman was peculiarly open to the temptation to emigrate.
Arrived in this country, the chances of finding employment in the line
of his training varied. Sometimes they were excellent, at other times
poor, depending mainly upon the craft represented. Carpenters were
in great demand, as were also blacksmiths, wheelwrights,
millwrights, masons, bricklayers, plasterers, and in general all
representatives of the building trades and of trades ministering to
farmers. Others were in occasional demand. But, if a dyer, or a
slater, or a cabinet maker, or a silversmith, or a tile maker, or a
weaver, or a wood carver happened to find himself in America
without a market for his peculiar skill, he always had the resource of
taking land and commencing as a farmer. Many craftsmen, indeed,
came with the set purpose of doing that immediately upon their
arrival; others contemplated a farming career after a period devoted
to their specialty. In some or all of these ways Germans trained as
craftsmen came to be widely distributed over the farming areas of
Wisconsin as well as among the cities, towns, and villages.
The possession of special skill in any line, like the possession of
special scientific knowledge, raises a man in social estimation, and
every trained worker properly regards himself with satisfaction as
being not quite “as other men are.” In addition to the social training
which came to him as an incident of his apprenticeship and
journeyman’s experience, the German craftsman often was able to
challenge the respect and admiration of his American neighbors by
making articles of cunning workmanship which to them seemed
wonderful because they did not understand the processes involved.
Agriculture being regarded as an unskilled occupation, the artisan
farmer also was very apt to lord it over the peasant farmer of his
own nationality. Craftsmanship, in a word, established a kind of rank
among Germans in this country because it was a recognized means
of personal and social progress at home.
Statistics are impossible to procure, but the testimony of men and
women familiar with early conditions in Wisconsin proves that the
German population of the state in early days varied quite as widely
in social characteristics as did the American population, though
America had no distinctive peasant class. Accordingly, although in
the beginnings of American contacts with their Prussian or
Westphalian neighbors these were lumped together indiscriminately
as “Dutchmen,” differences soon began to emerge. In the course of
a few years a class of “fine old Germans” was recognized in almost
every community to supplement the well-known type of “fine old
Yankee gentlemen.” These select Germans were very apt to be men
who had been trained as craftsmen, or men who had enjoyed the
advanced scientific or literary instruction afforded in the higher
schools and the universities of the homeland. In the cities, especially
Milwaukee, were many Germans who had been prominent in
business lines as well as in the professions.
The question has sometimes arisen why so many of the second-
generation Germans appear inferior in social character to their
immigrant parents. A hint of the reason is found in what has just
been said. Whatever elements of superiority were shown by the
immigrant artisan-farmers or the highly educated Germans, the
social advantages accruing therefrom were personal, and in a
slightly developed western society could not be handed on to the
next generation. In the cities it frequently was possible for men of
high ideals and fine social status to provide equivalent opportunities
for their children. But not so on frontier farms. There it was a rare
case when an education or training like that received by the father in
the old country could be supplied. Accordingly, the sons of the most
intelligent, dignified, and worthy German farmer, if they became
farmers in succession, might perhaps turn out mere farmers, with
none of the graces or exceptional social virtues of the parents, and
little except the memory of a parent’s high respectability to
distinguish them from the farmer sons of the clumsiest peasant.
However, this is but half the story. If the superior Germans reared
families incapable of remaining on their own social plane, other
types of Germans, who in their own persons counted for less,
frequently had the happiness to see their children advance to a
position perceptibly higher than their own. Natural gifts, industry, the
social opportunities which yield to the key of economic success
availed much. Sometimes the presence of a good school, a wise and
helpful pastor or some other worthy friend gave the necessary
impulse. The process, in fact, does not differ essentially from that
which, throughout American pioneer history, has enabled the
deserving to press forward and permitted the weak, indolent, or
vicious to fall behind in the social competition. It is impossible to say
how many German families made a step, or several steps, upward,
and how many others slipped back. The delinquents may perhaps
exceed the meritorious in number, but probably not, and the
impression that the children of German immigrants shame their
parents is almost certainly an illusion which would be likely to
disappear if the facts were fully known.
The social institutions of Wisconsin, based on the earlier Yankee and
southwestern immigrations, were profoundly influenced by the
German immigration of the late forties and the fifties of last century.
Milwaukee, the center of German influence (the Deutsche Athen),
became a city in which the German language was spoken and read
by many English speaking persons, in order to facilitate
communication and trade with the numerically dominant German
element. The Germans maintained advanced schools for instruction
in both English and German; their parochial schools were conducted
mainly in German; the immigrants themselves felt no compulsion to
learn English, and their children, in many cases, however well
educated, spoke the language of the country with very imperfect
accent.
The universal respect in which the German language was held, and
the extent to which it was affected by others than Germans,
provided an admirable social soil for the development of German
music and the cultivation of German literature. Hardly had the
immigrants established themselves when, in 1847, they founded at
Milwaukee their first singing society, which was followed three years
later by the famous and far-reaching Musikverein. A German theater
followed promptly, and became a permanent feature of Milwaukee’s
intellectual life.[47] The Turnverein fostered in America Father Jahn’s
conception of athletics, while restaurants and beer gardens gave an
old world, continental atmosphere to public recreation. Holidays
assumed a German aspect. The Christ Child displaced St. Nicholas
not alone in Milwaukee, but in scores of towns, villages, and
hamlets, and innumerable farm homes scattered over Wisconsin.
The joyous German Weinacht made way easily against the more
somber Puritan Christmas, which, however, had already brightened a
good deal in its progress from the seventeenth century to the
nineteenth century.
In general, Germans did not insist with extreme pertinacity upon the
retention of their own social customs, and wherever people of that
nationality were intermingled with a larger number of Americans, the
process by which they assimilated American habits of living,
American social usages, and even ways of acting, speaking, and
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com