Vampire God The Allure of The Undead in Western Culture Mary Y Hallab Instant Download
Vampire God The Allure of The Undead in Western Culture Mary Y Hallab Instant Download
https://ebookbell.com/product/vampire-god-the-allure-of-the-
undead-in-western-culture-mary-y-hallab-1884254
https://ebookbell.com/product/vampire-hunter-d-volume-18-fortress-of-
the-elder-god-hideyuki-kikuchi-yoshitaka-amano-37276198
https://ebookbell.com/product/vampire-hunter-d-vol-18-fortress-of-the-
elder-god-hideyuki-kikuchi-51390524
https://ebookbell.com/product/gods-ghostbusters-vampires-ghosts-
aliens-werewolves-creatures-of-the-night-beware-thomas-horn-22374440
https://ebookbell.com/product/vampires-ghosts-and-god-james-
aiden-8703672
Vampires Ghosts And God Omnibus James Aiden
https://ebookbell.com/product/vampires-ghosts-and-god-omnibus-james-
aiden-8703674
Vampires Ghosts And God Five Novel Box Set James Aiden
https://ebookbell.com/product/vampires-ghosts-and-god-five-novel-box-
set-james-aiden-9206296
https://ebookbell.com/product/vampires-deception-a-steamy-paranormal-
urban-fantasy-romance-immortal-protector-book-1-stephanie-
flynn-45017720
https://ebookbell.com/product/vampires-promise-a-steamy-paranormal-
urban-fantasy-romance-stephanie-flynn-48572420
https://ebookbell.com/product/vampires-secret-a-steamy-paranormal-
urban-fantasy-romance-immortal-protector-book-2-stephanie-
flynn-48572422
This page intentionally left blank.
Vampire God
This page intentionally left blank.
Vampire God
The Allure of the Undead in Western Culture
MARY Y. HALLAB
Cover design by Kevin Prufer
Published by
State University of New York Press, Albany
PN56.V3H36 2009
809.3'9375—dc22 2009005250
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Contents
Acknowledgments / vii
Introduction / 1
Notes / 137
Index / 161
vi Contents
Acknowledgments
This book couldn’t have been completed without the valuable help of Kevin
Prufer and Martha Collins. Thanks also to Sheryl Craig, Celia Kingsbury,
Charles Martin, Don Melichar, and the good people at the University of
Central Missouri’s Interlibrary Loan office.
This book is dedicated to Kevin Prufer.
vii
This page intentionally left blank.
Introduction 1
Introduction
Why is the vampire so popular? Why has the vampire been so often seem-
ingly dead and so often revived in literature and drama? Tony Thorne in his
study Children of the Night: Of Vampires and Vampirism (1999) is astonished
to realize that, today, a survey of world cultural history reveals “the constant
presence of a Vampire or vampire-like monster in our narratives—both
grand and humble—and our popular culture.” He concludes that the crea-
ture survives by its “uncanny” ability to mutate into “whatever our society
shuns, but secretly demands” (4). In our society, the vampire, much like its
Eastern European and Greek folkloric antecedents, usually manifests itself as
a dead human who rises from the grave and behaves as though he is living,
more or less. My question is: what hidden void is modern Western society
trying to fill with this fantasy? What is it trying to tell itself? What does
it “secretly demand”?
In Reading the Vampire (1994), discussing Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897),
Ken Gelder says that “a veritable ‘academic industry’ has built itself around
this novel” (65). He provides an extensive, though not exhaustive, review of
differing critical interpretations of vampire literature from relatively early
ethnographic studies of vampire folklore—like John Lawson’s comparison of
Greek folklore and ancient Greek religion (1909)—to his own postmodern
approach to recent vampire films. These lead him to conclude, like Thorne,
that the vampire will not die for the reason that it is so “highly adaptable”
that it can appeal to fundamental urges like desire and fear and respond to
cultural and societal issues (141). And, we might add, because of its unique
bipolarity—both human and supernatural, alive and dead—the vampire leads
us to a larger consideration of the nature of the individual and his search
for significance in a vast and terrifying universe.
Both folkloric and literary, ancient and modern vampires are various
and difficult to sum up with a single set of characteristics. Folklore vampires
are often mixed up in various ways with other supernatural beings, such
as nereiads, morae, witches, werewolves, and ghosts, so that observers are
forced to make arbitrary choices as to what they will or will not classify as
a vampire. We face the same problem today: for example, is Keats’s “Belle
1
2 Vampire God
Dame sans Merci” a vampire or a demon lover? Are the creatures in Night
of the Living Dead (1968) zombies or vampires? I have chosen to include as
vampires only those figures—folkloric, mythical, or literary—who are dead
humans who are still capable of behaving as though they are alive. I will not
consider creatures like various incubi and succubae or lamias or mindless,
lurching zombies simply because they can take human form. Nor will I
consider living humans who drink blood or avoid sunlight, no matter what
they call themselves.
My discussion of folklore vampires will stick to those of Eastern
Europe and the Mediterranean because they are the ones that have pro-
vided the “germ” for vampire literature and the modern mania for vampires
in Western Europe and the Americas. Recognizing, too, that even modern
literary vampires may vary in form and function from culture to culture, I
will limit my focus primarily to those in England and America, with the aim
of discovering what the vampire does for those who engage with it. What are
vampires good for? What do the critics think? What do I think?
in modern movie vampires like Anne Rice’s Vampire Lestat (1985). However,
although the repressed sexuality explanation may fit many vampires, from
Dracula to Buffy’s Angel, it hardly explains the popularity of vampire toys,
vampire jokes, vampire ballets, operas, breakfast cereals, cartoons, including
good vampires, bad vampires, child, adult, male, female, geriatric vampires,
vampires from space, from next door, dog and bunny vampires, psychological
and psychic vampires, ugly, beautiful, happy, sad vampires, vampire punks,
detectives, cab drivers, travel agents, artists and art collectors, even clergymen
and obstreperous adolescents. Not all vampires are sexy.
But all vampires are living dead—and therefore supernatural and mythi-
cal. Because vampires survive across the impassable boundary, even the puniest
of them have an aura of mystery and transcendence that, coming from the
land of the dead, takes us beyond the mundane. When vampires are sexy,
they are so because they are powerful, dangerous, and forbidden, and not the
reverse, although their erotic attractiveness may be a lure into danger. True,
in early stories like the anonymous “The Mysterious Stranger” (1860), the
message seems to be to young ladies: Beware of infatuation with attractive
strangers. This is the same moral we find in many modern serial killer mov-
ies. But, as with the serial killer, the danger itself is not forbidden or quirky
sex, but death. If the killer enticed children with shiny toys, we would not
say that the story was about shiny toys. Although there may be (intentional
or not) a comment on the dangers of sexuality, as in ballads of the demon
lover, the erotic vampire seducer may say more about the attractiveness of
danger and death than about sex.
Possibly, vampires like Dracula allowed nineteenth-century writers
and readers to explore (supposedly) forbidden topics while pretending to
be frightened, but modern audiences certainly have no such need. Even on
television commercials, we see tampons waved about and enthusiastic tout-
ing of products to cure male impotency. We see talk shows in which the
guests tell about their lives as prostitutes, their incestuous abuse as children,
and their strange plastic surgeries. We have nearly inescapable internet porn.
What do we need vampires for? Yet they survive and even flourish, sug-
gesting that they must offer something besides sex or even danger that is
uniquely their own.
To take another example, even though Stoker’s Dracula may be a
foreigner in England, not all literary vampires incite a fear of foreigners or
other outsiders.3 Not all vampires are foreigners. John Polidori’s Lord Ruthven
in his story “The Vampyre” (1819) is only a Scotsman; the English Varney
the Vampyre and the Styrian Carmilla are not foreign within the context
of their stories. For exotic nefariousness or even seductiveness, poor Varney,
for example, seems so inadequate that one must look elsewhere to find the
source of his popularity in the nineteenth century. This popularity must lie
4 Vampire God
in the fact that he is a living dead. For from folklore to modern films, if we
take away the vampire’s essential quality, its undeadness, the character becomes
considerably less compelling. Imagine Dracula, for example, as nothing more
than a seductive and insidious foreigner. On the other hand, imagine Dracula
as entirely supernatural, a mere ghost with no bodily presence. In short, the
fascination of the vampire lies in his being both human and supernatural.
When the possibility for revival seems most hopeless (when it has been
decapitated, ashed, drowned, and eaten by worms), it can still pop up again,
as much a nuisance as ever, almost as good as new, and significantly, with
its individual identity intact.
True, one appeal of certain vampires lies in their breaking of various
cultural taboos and their warnings about assorted dangers to the community.
But we can and do have sensuality, brutality, arrogance, selfishness, intol-
erance, insidious evil, and even aristocratic bad manners in many Gothic
villains like Ann Radcliffe’s Montoni in The Mysteries of Udolpho (1794) or
Hannibal Lector in the film Silence of the Lambs (1991), who seem very
much like vampires but lack the essential element that distinguishes the
vampire—that of being living dead. To some critics, vampire literature offers
a means to understand the world we live in and to formulate our own
identities or sense of identity within this world. In Terrors of Uncertainty:
The Cultural Contexts of Horror Fiction (1989), Joseph Grixti argues that, to
some degree, horror fiction defines reality for us by providing models and
modes of thinking that form a “component of our culturally determined
intersubjectivity” (7). The vampire, for example, embodies (so to speak)
our response to “the horrors of death and corruption as well as those of
earthbound immortality” (14).
However, Grixti regards horror literature negatively, as an inadequate
response to the fear and uncertainty in the modern world, which is assuaged
by a form of magical, as opposed to realistic, thinking. He generally regards
it as a harmful “game” we are enticed into by commercialized horror litera-
ture (148) that exacerbates our fears and anxieties by mythologizing them in
the form of various superstitions and then “proffering magical solutions and
soothing (if ostrich-like) cures for the horrifying and disturbing states which
they invite us to consider” (176). That is, rather than regarding these fears
as innate to humankind and merely expressed in fiction (from Gilgamesh to
the present), he regards them as created by a greedy corporate hegemony for
the purpose, apparently, of driving us into the magical safety zone of escapist
fantasy and superstition also for sale by that hegemony (182–83).
His solution would be for us to reassert our sense of rational control.
But death (real and inevitable death—so unfair) seems to be the very area
of experience that stymies rational thought. Grixti’s approach contains two
mistakes, in my thinking, which I hope to avoid. First, like a number of other
Introduction 5
critics, he assumes that whatever falls under the general rubric of “horror
literature” (which is not so easy to define) is inevitably horrible and fearful
to the reader or audience rather than, like most vampire literature, eerily and
interestingly uncanny (or even funny). Second, he also apparently believes
that the average reader has little self-awareness or sense of reality and is very
easily led to respond to fantasies like the vampire with terror and anxiety
rather than as a stimulus to speculation and understanding.
In contrast to Grixti, I prefer to take the approach that most people—
peasants and scholars—pretty much know what they think and believe. This
position is argued by the sociologist Kathy Charmaz, in an essay in the third
edition of Death and Identity (1994). She regards human beings “as reflective,
creative, and active” (30), who have, Charmaz says, “selves and minds” (32).
Through conscious interactions, they construct a (more or less) stable reality
shared by a social community. Changes in this constructed world occur as a
result of individual choices and influences, generally based on a “rational and
pragmatic bias,” according to which “meaning is related to utility and to the
practical aspects of experience” (34–35). A particular element of belief—about
the meaning of death, for example—persists through cultural changes and
diversions because it fulfills a significant function at least for some people
(29). However, because individuals are free to make choices, we cannot
expect everyone to think the same way. These choices will be reflected, for
example, in the images by which they decide to represent death, as, say, an
angel song, a violent struggle, or a vampire.
Writers like Nina Auerbach, Carol Senf, and Gregory A. Waller are
concerned with how literary vampires, even Dracula, modify to reflect changing
environmental circumstances and cultural assumptions, from the nineteenth
century to the present. The vampire’s most human quality—its infinite adapt-
ability to people, place, and time—is a major reason for its persistence. This,
along with its very un-human and ambiguous position between the flesh and
the spirit, its mysterious comings and goings, and its variable forms and faces,
allows it to be continually revived in different guises in our differing worlds.
But as diverse as they may be, from the bloated peasant of folklore to the
opera-caped Dracula to the bratty Lost Boys (1987), vampires address issues
and attitudes about death and immortality that are meaningful in all times
and places. However much the contexts and ideologies of death may have
been modified over the years, the fact of death remains the same, inevitable,
irrevocable, and final.
Death, these days, however, is not often clearly constructed or even
discussed. We do not see dying people interviewed on Oprah or cheered up
by Dr. Phil. We do not see dying old people at all if we can help it. We
do not see death explained. Advertisements for “funeral parlors” or “homes”
come discreetly in the mail; the word die is replaced by the phrase “when
6 Vampire God
your time comes.” For many today, especially the young, the only place even
to find out about death is in the movies and on television, where there is
plenty of it, mostly of the violent and thus preventable kind—car crashes
or serial killers, for example. Apparently, we do not have to die. Death
always has causes that can be treated and cured if we just know how. Thus
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross shocked America with her book On Death and Dying
(1969, 1997) based on her conviction that the denial of death, the refusal
to acknowledge its inevitability and even its actual occurrence in family and
friends, is a commonplace of modern living.4
A different kind of denial was manifested in John Edwards’s weekly
series Crossing Over (1999–2004) in which he supposedly communicated
(in a very general way) with deceased relatives of audience members. In
HBO television series like Six Feet Under (2001–2005), the dead appear as
ghosts, asserting their continued existence somewhere and their continu-
ing influence on the living as though they were not dead at all. Obvi-
ously, many people are fascinated with death, and almost everyone fears it,
although most of us do not care to acknowledge it just yet. In the popular
media, too, death is treated (when it is treated at all) either as a vague and
mysterious existence in another world or as a horrifying and unfortunate
mistake—one which, however, with healthy living, the right exercise, the
right neighborhoods, or the right faith (sincerely held) might be avoided.
We seldom admit that deaths, even among the very old, are unavoidable;
someone must be to blame.
The vampire provides a fictitious and mythical focus for universal
concerns about death and its reasons—as well as for a good deal of wishful
thinking. In the first place, the vampire is often a bringer of death, even
a personification of death itself—a mortal danger to the protagonists. And
like the popular literature of natural catastrophes or serial killings, vampire
stories and films offer means and methods by which this danger can be
averted. More important, the vampire overcomes death and, in doing so,
promises eternal life on a somewhat earthier and more comprehensible level
than most religious faiths. It posits, at least, the renewal of life, very much
like the archetypal dying god (very likely its remote ancestor). Possibly, it
fulfills for some of its enthusiasts, on some level of consciousness, the role
of this mythical figure, the vegetation deity, which dies and is reborn each
year. Or it is itself a kind of goddess or god of the dead, or Death itself. As
such, it is also the source of fecundity and new life, and its sexuality is that
of the force that makes the dead nature bloom. Stoker’s Dracula and many
others like it can be regarded as retellings of the Hades and Persephone
story or other pagan myths of underworld gods. Whatever it is, the vampire
has mythical significance as an in-between creature of this and the “other”
Introduction 7
world, hinting to us that such a world might exist, for the very reason that
the vampire refuses to go there. The vampire is popular because it will not
die, and, however monstrous it may seem, unlike other monsters, it remains
a human—who, by virtue of its immortality, becomes a god.
The primary effect of vampire literature is not to threaten readers with
death, but to provide a symbolic and metaphorical means to apprehend,
contemplate, and deal with death within the larger context of life. Dealing
with death and the dead, moreover, involves thinking about the past. The
literary vampire often comes out of an imaginary past more or less Gothic in
nature, peopled with impressive mythical and supernatural figures, impossibly
virtuous maidens, dauntless heroes, satanic villains, and fantastic monsters
that we are familiar with from traditional stories, fairy tales, and Arthurian
legends and that remain alive in the modern imagination. Because of this
association and because popular Gothic literature found early expression in
the Graveyard School of poetry, Gothic critics seem more likely than others
to find in vampires various messages about death.
The Western vampire also has a tradition of its own that begins with
folklore vampires of Greece and the Slavic countries. And in spite of seem-
ingly vast differences (bloated peasant versus suave aristocrat), there is a
surprising consistency in vampire behavior and function from these beginnings
to the present. Folklore vampires provide important clues to understanding
the meaning of vampires in modern popular literature. We are not, after
all, so very far advanced from our own village origins of a few hundred
years ago that we no longer need the comfort and solutions to life’s mys-
teries that folklore and mythology provide. Nor, as we have noted, are our
lives destitute of folklore figures, who survive and multiply in the myriads
of fairies, ghosts, alien invaders, mad scientists, aerobatic superheroes, and,
recently, angelic visitants, and other denizens of the New Age that fill the
media. The modern literary vampire—although superficially advanced from
his folklore peasant origins—arose, one might say, and flourished along with
many other rather unorthodox supernatural beings, that, if not the objects
of firm belief, at least allow the mind to dwell on possibilities beyond those
offered by conventional religion or rational empiricism.
Sources
case with the outburst of vampire activity in Eastern Europe in the eighteenth
century that first aroused literary and scholarly—and theological—interest.
Particularly, a lengthy report on this phenomenon by Augustine Calmet
(1746)—a biblical scholar appointed to investigate its legitimacy—quickly
became a best seller in Western European countries, primarily France, Ger-
many, and England. This, along with other reports like that by Giuseppe
Davanzati (1744), aroused interest in vampire folklore that—combined with
appropriate mythical and literary figures, like Faust, Milton’s Satan, and
the Byronic Hero—eventually gave birth to the modern literary vampire,
which now has a mythology of its own. Calmet’s survey became a source
for Romantic writers like Southey, Byron, and Stoker, and although many of
his accounts are highly questionable, they provide considerable information
about folk beliefs.
In addition, some Slavic and Greek villagers living until recently in
isolated areas have preserved vampire folklore, which has thus been available
for study in its own environment by modern folklorists and anthropologists
aiming at some degree of objectivity. It is on their accounts that I have cho-
sen to rely for the organizing principle and basis of my discussion, especially
those who have gleaned their information from direct personal contact with
the people they have studied. I have tried to avoid sources about folklore
vampires that seem to be aimed primarily at creating sensational effects
by tossing together all the “lore” they can come across, frequently citing
questionable sources or none at all. This means I will be cautious in using
information from the famous vampire expert Montague Summers, although
I cannot resist commenting on his motives and influence.
Instead, in addition to Calmet, I have chosen to rely primarily on
scholars like Jan Perkowski or Richard and Eva Blum, who show familiarity
with the people and cultures that produced the vampire folklore we know,
and who are objective enough to draw attention themselves to possible biases
in their studies. For example, in The Dangerous Hour: The Lore of Crisis and
Mystery in Rural Greece (1970), Blum and Blum recount the responses by
Greek peasants and shepherds to a systematic survey designed to call up
unusual or uncanny stories related to illness and death. Thus the responses
may suggest a stronger role for these beliefs than actually exists (3–4). Gail
Kligman’s study The Wedding of the Dead: Ritual, Poetics, and Popular Culture
in Transylvania (1988) derives from her firsthand observations while living
among the people of the isolated area of Maramures in northern Transyl-
vania. Her analysis of rituals and laments from weddings and funerals may
be colored by her own feminist dismay at the position of women in this
male-dominated culture. But she has clearly endeavored to report their beliefs
and practices accurately and sympathetically.
Introduction 9
[#] Landing-stage.
"I have heard what the sahib did for my son. I thank the sahib," he
said.
"Yes, 'twas excellent good fortune for Surendra Nath," said Mr.
Merriman. "I knew you would be overjoyed to see your son again.
But how is the bibi,[#] and the chota[#] bibi?"
"They were well, sahib, when last I heard. They are on a visit to
Watts Sahib, at Cossimbazar."
Merriman's face fell, but he had no time to say more, for he was
accosted by a friend.
"Glad to see you back, Mr. Merriman. I've wanted your voice on
the Council for some time past."
"Is anything wrong, Mr. Holwell?" asked Merriman anxiously.
"Everything is wrong. Alivirdi died a fortnight ago; Siraj-uddaula
has stepped into his shoes; and Drake has made a mess of
everything, with Manningham's and Frankland's assistance. I want
you to come and dine with me this evening; we must have a serious
talk; I've asked two or three men of our sort in anticipation of your
consent."
"Very well. Let me present my friend Mr. Burke. He escaped
from Gheria; you've heard that Colonel Clive captured the place?"
"Yes; we had despatches from Admiral Watson some days ago. I
have heard of Mr. Burke's adventures; your servant, sir; I am
delighted to meet you. Well, Merriman, three o'clock; I will not
detain you now; you'll want to get home."
Mr. Merriman's bearers were at hand with his palanquin; he got
into it; the men set off at a swinging pace, warning the bystanders
with their cry of "Tok! Tok!" and Desmond walked by the side of the
chair, amused to watch the self-important airs of the peon who went
in front. They passed the Fort and the Company's house, and arrived
at length at a two-storey flat-roofed house with a veranda, the
windows filled, not with oyster shells as at Bombay, but with thin
screens of reeds.
"Here we are," said Merriman with a sigh of relief "Now I'll hand
you over to the baniya[#]; he'll show you to your room. I'm vexed
that my wife is not here; of course she didn't know when to expect
me; and Mrs. Watts is an old friend of hers. 'Tis a relief in one way;
for Mr. Watts is a shrewd fellow--he's head of our factory at
Cossimbazar, and senior member of Council here--and he would
have sent the ladies away if he scented danger. Sorry I shall have to
leave you; I must dine with Mr. Holwell; he's our zamindar--judge of
the Cutcheri court and collector of taxes: a fine fellow, the most
cool-headed man on the Council. But the khansaman will give you
something to eat: and I'll be back as soon as I can. You can take it
easy on the veranda, and you'll find a hookah if you care to try it."
[#] Factotum.
"No, thanks," said Desmond with a smile; "I've no fancy that way."
Shortly afterwards Mr. Merriman left the house in his palanquin,
wearing the short white calico jacket that was then de rigueur at
dinner parties. It was late before he returned. There was an anxious
and worried look on his face, but he said cheerily:
"Well, how have you been getting on?"
"I've been reading, sir: I found a volume of Mr. Fielding's
Amelia, and 'twas a change to read after eighteen months without
setting eyes on a book. I hope you had a good dinner."
"'Pon my soul I don't know. None of us know. I warrant. We had
too much to talk about to think about our appetites. Two or three
members of Council were there, and Captain Minchin, the military
commandant. Things are looking black, Desmond. Alivirdi is dead,
and, as I expected, his scoundrel of a grandson, Siraj-uddaula, is the
new Subah. He has imprisoned one of his rivals, his aunt, and is
marching against another, his cousin Shaukat Jung; and 'tis the
common talk that our turn will come next."
"But why should he be at odds with us?"
"Why, to begin with, he's a native and hates us; thinks we're too
rich; and though he's rich enough he would like to get what we have
and turn us out. Then our president Mr. Drake has acted in the
weakest possible way; the very way to encourage the Subah.
Instead of siding with Siraj-uddaula from the first, as he might well
have done, because the rivals never had the ghost of a chance, he
shilly-shallied. Then he offended him by giving shelter to a fellow
named Krishna Das, who came in a month ago with fifty sacks of
treasure from Murshidabad; it really belonged to the Subah's aunt,
but the Subah had an eye on it and he's furious at losing it. That
wasn't enough. Mr. Watts at Cossimbazar had warned the Council
here of the new Subah's unfriendliness; they talk at Murshidabad of
our weak defences and how easy it would be to overcome us. He
advised Mr. Drake to keep on good terms with the Subah; but what
must he do but turn out of the place a man named Narayan Das, the
brother of the new Nawab's chief spy."
"Sure you don't allow the enemy's spies to live in Calcutta?"
"Sure we can't help ourselves. The place is full of them--spies of
the Subah, and of the French too. We can't do anything. We may
suspect, but if we raised a hand we should stir up a hornets' nest, as
indeed Mr. Drake appears to be doing. But that isn't all. The
Company's ship Delaware came in a fortnight ago with the news that
a French fleet is fitting out under Count Lally, at Brest; 'tis supposed
war will break out again and the fleet is intended to attack us here.
So that we may have the Subah making common cause with the
French to crush us. He'll turn against the French then, but that won't
save us. On top of that comes a fakir from Murshidabad demanding
in the Subah's name that we should stop work on our fortifications;
the insolence of the wretch passes all bounds. Mr. Drake properly
refused the demand; he said we were repairing our defences in case
we needed 'em against the French; but he undertook not to start
any new works, which was a mistake. Altogether, Desmond, things
are in a pretty mess. I'm afraid Mr. Drake is not the man to cope
with a grave situation; but he has the majority of the Council with
him, and we can't alter it. Now I think we had better turn in;
perhaps I shall feel better after a good sleep; I am certainly far from
easy in mind."
Desmond slept like a top on his light mattress, enveloped in his
mosquito curtains. In the morning he accompanied Mr. Merriman to
his daftarkhanah,[#] where he found a large staff under the
superintendence of the muhri,[#] Surendra Nath's father. He
returned to the house for tiffin, spent the afternoon indoors over his
novel, and after the three o'clock dinner accompanied his host in a
walk through the English quarter.
[#] Office.
[#] Chief clerk.
[#] Substantial.
"We were talking yesterday about spies," said Merriman. "In that
house lives a man who in my belief is a spy, and a treacherous
scoundrel--actually living next door to Mr. Eyre, the keeper of our
military stores. He's a Sikh named Omichand, and the richest
merchant in the city. He owns half of it; he's my landlord, confound
him! For forty years he was the contractor for supplying the
Company with cloth, but we found out that he was cheating us right
and left, and dismissed him. Yet he's very friendly to us, which is a
bad sign. 'Twas he who brought Krishna Das with his treasure into
the place, and my belief is, he did it merely to embroil us with the
Subah. Mr. Drake is disposed to pooh-pooh the idea, but I incline to
Mr. Holwell's opinion, that Omichand's a schemer and a villain, ready
to betray us to French, Dutch, or Gentoos as it suits him."
"Why don't you turn him out, then?" asked Desmond.
"My dear boy, he's far too powerful. And we'd rather keep him
in sight. While he's here we can tell something of what is going on;
his house is pretty well watched; but if he were away he might try
all manner of tricks and we should never learn anything about them.
Our policy is to be very sweet to him--to make friends of the
mammon of unrighteousness, as Mr. Bellamy, our padre, puts it.
You're bound to see him one of these days, the hoary-headed old
villain."
Though Mr. Merriman fully relied on Mr. Watts' discretion to send
his visitors back to Calcutta if there were the least sign of danger, he
was so anxious to have his wife and daughter with him that next day
he sent a special messenger up the river asking them to return as
soon as they could. He could not fetch them, public affairs not
allowing him to leave Calcutta at once, but he promised to meet
them somewhere on the way. He spent the day in making himself
acquainted with the business that had been done during his
absence. A valuable consignment of silks, muslins, and taffeties was
expected from Cossimbazar, he learnt, and as soon as it arrived the
Hormuzzeer would be able to sail for Penang.
"A private venture," he said to Desmond, "nothing to do with
the Company."
Desmond expressed his surprise that the Company's officials
were at liberty to engage in private trading.
"Why, bless you, how could we live otherwise? Do you imagine I
got rich on the Company? What do you suppose my salary is as
member of Council? 'Tis just forty pounds. The factors get fifteen
and the writers five: Colonel Clive began at five pounds a year: so
you may guess that we have to do something to keep flesh on our
bones. And that reminds me of a proposal I wished to make to you.
You have a little money from the sale of the Pirate's grab, and you'll
have more by and by when the Gheria prize-money is distributed.
Why not put some of it into the Hormuzzeer? Let me buy some
goods for you, and send 'em to Penang: they'll fetch top prices there
in the present state of trade. 'Twill be an excellent investment."
"Thank you, sir, I'll be glad to follow your advice."
"That's right. I'll see about it at once, and the sooner these
things come from Cossimbazar the better. The delay is vexing, and I
fear I'll have to change my agent there."
Mr. Merriman being so much occupied with business and public
affairs, Desmond had much time to himself. He soon made friends
among the junior merchants and factors, and in their company went
about Calcutta. Fort William was built near the river, the factory
house in the centre of the enclosure. Around it on three sides were
the houses of individual merchants and officers. A wide avenue
known as the Lai Bazar led from the ravelin of the fort past the
court-house to the native part of the town. On one side of the
avenue was the Park or Lai Bagh, with a great tank by which a band
played in the evening. Around the town was the incomplete Maratha
ditch.
Desmond became the object of much kindly attention from the
Company's servants and their families. Every one was eager to hear
from his own lips the story of his adventures, and invitations to
dinners and routs and card parties poured upon him. He accepted a
few and politely excused himself from the rest, not from any want of
sociability, but from motives of prudence. His kind host had already
given him a friendly warning; some of the writers and younger
servants of the Company were wild spirits, and spent more time than
was good for them in cards and revels.
On the evening of the third day after landing he went down to
the river to watch the arrival of some country vessels. There was the
usual crowd at the ghat, and as Desmond gradually worked his way
through it he suddenly saw, just in front of him, two men whose
backs were very familiar. They were in the dress of seamen: one was
tall and thin, the other broad and brawny, and Desmond did not
need his glimpse of the iron hook to be sure that the men were none
other than his old friend Bulger and Mr. Toley, the melancholy mate.
They were standing side by side, watching in silence the arrival of
the boats.
Desmond edged his way to them until he was within arm's
length of Bulger's hook. He stood for a moment looking at them,
imagining their surprise when they saw him, wondering if their
pleasure would be as keen as his own. Both appeared rather
battered; Mr. Toley's expression was never merry, and he was
neither more nor less melancholy than usual; but Bulger's habitual
cheerfulness seemed to have left him; his air was moody and
downcast. How came they here? The Good Intent being an
interloper, it was not at all likely that she had ventured to put in at
Calcutta.
By and by Bulger seemed to become aware that some one was
gazing at him, for he turned round slowly. Desmond could not but
smile at his extraordinary change of expression. His first look of
blank amazement quickly gave place to one of almost boyish delight,
and taking an eager step forward he exclaimed:
"By thunder, 'tis Mr. Burke or his ghost! Bless my heart! Ho!
shake hands, matey; this is a sight for sad eyes!"
"Glad to see you, Bulger," said Desmond quietly; "and you too,
Mr. Toley."
Mr. Toley had shown no surprise; but then, nothing ever
surprised Mr. Toley.
"Sure I'm rejoiced," he said. "We had given you up for lost."
His hearty hand-grip was more convincing than his words,
though, indeed, Desmond had good reason to know the real
kindliness that always lay behind his outward solemnity of manner.
"You're better in togs than when I seed you last, sir," said
Bulger, gripping his hand again. "Which you look quite the
gentleman; got a berth as supercargo, sir?"
"Not yet, Bulger," replied Desmond, laughing. "How's Captain
Barker?"
Bulger spat out a quid of tobacco and hitched up his breeches.
"I don't know how Captain Barker is, and what's more, I don't
care," he said. "Me and Barker en't friends: leastways, not on
speakin' terms; which I will say, hang Captain Barker, topsy-versy,
any way you like; and I don't care who hears me."
"What has happened?"
"Happened! Why, sir, Mr. Toley'll tell you what happened. He
knows the thus, therefore, and whereupon of it."
The good fellow was itching to tell, but in duty bound deferred
to his superior officer.
"Go on, Bulger," said the American, "you've got a looser tongue
than me."
"Which I don't deny, sir. Two days ago--'twas at Chandernagore,
where the Good Intent's been laid up for a matter o' weeks--the
captain he went an' forgot hisself, sir; clean forgot hisself, an' lifted
his hand to Mr. Toley; ay, hit him, sir. Wunst it was, sir, on'y wunst;
then 'twas Mr. Toley his turn. Ah, an' I warrant Captain Barker's in
his bunk to-day. Never did I see sich a sight all the years I've been
afloat, an' that's sayin' something. There was captain spread out on
deck, sir, with his eyes bunged up an' a tooth or two that had lost
their bearin's, and all his bones wonderin' if they was ever goin' to
get joined again. That's the why and wherefore of it, sir. Well, in
course, 'twas no kiss-an'-be-friends arter that; so, bein' in a
mounseer's place, Mr. Toley took French leave, which I did the same,
and here we are a-lookin' for a job.
"But Lor' bless me! what's happened to you, Mr. Burke? When
you didn't come aboard at that there Gheria, Captain Barker he says,
'Log that there knave Burke a deserter,' says he. But I says to Mr.
Toley, 'I may be wrong, sir,' says I, 'but I lay my whiskers that Diggle
has been an' sold him to the Pirate, an' that's the last we shall ever
see of as nice a young fellow as ever hauled on a hawser.' How did
you get out of the Pirate's den, sir?"
"That's a long story, Bulger. I'll tell you all in good time. You're
looking for a job, are you? Well, I happen to know of a skipper here-
-a good man: maybe he'll have a berth for a seasoned salt like you.
I'll present you to him, and I know he'll do what he can for you."
Before he left the men, Desmond took Mr. Toley aside.
"Mr. Toley," he said, "my friend Mr. Merriman wants a mate for
one of his vessels, as I happen to know. You would be willing to sign
on?"
"I would, sir. I'm a man of few words."
"Very well; come up to Mr. Merriman's house by the Rope Walk
and we'll see what he says."
That same day Mr. Merriman invited the American to dinner, and
engaged him, to Desmond's surprise, as first mate for the
Hormuzzeer, with Bulger as bo'sun.
"Don't look so blue," he said to Desmond when Mr. Toley had
gone. "He will, of course, take your place. The fact is, I've taken a
fancy to you, and I think you can do better than by serving as mate
on a country vessel. Look in at the daftarkhanah sometimes, and get
Surendra Nath to explain something of our business methods."
He said no more at that time, and Desmond felt no little
curiosity about his host's intentions.
One evening Desmond was sitting alone on the veranda,
reading, awaiting Mr. Merriman's return from a meeting of the
Council to which he had been hastily summoned. Hearing a footstep
he looked up, and was surprised to see, instead of Mr. Merriman, as
he expected, Bulger hastening up with an air of excitement.
"Mr. Burke, sir, what d'you think I've seed? I could hardly believe
my own eyes. I was walkin' down towards the fort when I seed two
men goin' into a big house. They was Englishmen, leastways white
men, and I may be wrong, but I bet my boots one on 'em was that
there soft-speakin' villain Diggle."
"Diggle!" exclaimed Desmond, springing up. "You must be
mistaken, Bulger."
"I may be wrong, sir, but I never remembers any time when I
was."
"What house did he go into?"
"That I can't tell you, sir, not bein' sure o' my bearin's."
"But you could point it out?"
"'Course I could. Rather. Just so."
"Then I'll come along with you, and you can show me. If it is
Diggle we must have him arrested."
"True, an' I'll knot the rope for his neck."
"How long ago was this?"
"Not a quarter of an hour, sir. I comed up at once."
The two set off together. They quickly reached the house;
Desmond recognized it as Omichand's. The evening was closing in,
but no lights were visible through the chiks[#] that covered the
windows. While Desmond was considering, two figures stepped
down from the veranda and walked rapidly across the compound
towards the gate in the wall. At the first glance Desmond saw that
Bulger had not been mistaken. The taller of the two figures was
disguised, but it was impassible to mistake the gloved right hand. It
was Diggle to a certainty.
ebookbell.com