Covid
Covid
https://doi.org/10.54034/mic.e1547
Microbes, Infection and Chemotherapy
1
Abstract Department of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, National
Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (NITRD), Sri
Background and Objectives. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are the frontline Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-
warriors of the battle against COVID-19 and are at high risk of exposure to SARS- 0606-8009
CoV-2. Therefore, knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) among HCWs play a 2
vital role in preventing and spreading COVID-19. Hence, the current study aimed State-Viral Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (VRDL),
Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College &
to assess KAP among HCWs regarding COVID-19. Methods. This descriptive,
Associated Lok Nayak Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
cross-sectional study enrolled 171 HCWs of a national institute in North India. A https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-1102
self-administered questionnaire was used to assess KAP among HCWs
regarding COVID-19. Descriptive statistical analysis was applied to compare and 3
Department of Microbiology, Lady Hardinge Medical College &
represent the level of association of KAP scores among HCWs. Results. Among Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
%
HCWs (n=171), 106 (61.98%) were males, and 65 (38.01%) were females. Most https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-6676
(n=76; 44.44%) belonged to the 20-29 age group. The mean±S.D score of HCWs
Corresponding author:
for knowledge, attitude, and practice were 42.76±2.14, 28.91±1.59 and
*Dr. Manoj Kumar, MD (Microbiology), DTCD (TB & Respiratory
20.38±1.46, respectively. Excellent knowledge, attitude, and practice score Diseases), Professor, Department of Microbiology, Lady Hardinge
were found in 66.1%, 69.1%, and 97.1% of HCWs, respectively. Knowledge score Medical College
was maximum in resident doctors (44.09±1.13); however, multi-tasking staff Address: New Delhi- 110001, Tel: +91-7838358002.
(29.35±1.44), laboratory technicians (29.31±1.21), and ward boys (29.29±1.59) E-mail: [email protected]
had better attitude scores. Nurses (28.44±1.69) and safaikaramacharis ORCID: 0000-0002-8792-1261
(28.11±1.96) had low attitude scores. The practice score of nurses and multi- Copyright © 2022 the Author(s)
tasking staff fared well than resident doctors. Knowledge and attitude scores
Submitted: September 21, 2022
were statistically associated with the profession and higher level of education.
Reviewed : October 18, 2022
Conclusion. The study highlights that most HCWs have good KAP regarding
Approved: November 10, 2022
COVID-19. Continuous dissemination of education on the prevention of the
spread of COVID-19 is advised among HCWs to improve their knowledge. How to cite: Kumar-Munjal S, Singh-Dhakad M, Kumar M, Gogoi S. A
Hence, it will strengthen the health workforce in the battle against COVID-19. cross-sectional study to assess knowledge, attitude and practice
among healthcare workers regarding COVID-19 at a National
Key word: attitude, COVID-19, knowledge, healthcare workers, practice Institute of North India. Microbes Infect Chemother. 2022; 2: e1547
coughing or sneezing, avoid close contact with anyone Confidentiality of the study participants' identities was
showing symptoms of respiratory illness (14). maintained during the study. The participation was voluntary
and non-compensated. All participants were explained in
During the pandemic, accelerated emergency detail about the study and informed signed consent was
vaccine development led to using different vaccine platforms taken from each participant.
such as inactivated, virus-like particles, viral vectors, mRNA,
self-amplifying RNA, DNA, and live attenuated vaccines (15). Sample Size. The sample size was calculated by following the
In India, Covishield, Covaxin, Sputnik, Moderna, Johnson & exact binomial confidence limit method:–
Johnson, and ZyCoV-D have been given approval for
emergency use. India began the administration of COVID-19 N = Z² x (p) x (1-p)/C² = (1.96)2 (0.8) (0.2) / (0.06)2 =170.66
vaccines on January 16, 2021. As of May 23, 2022, India has
administered over 192.5 crores, including the first and second Where N = Sample size, Z = value corresponding to a given
doses of the currently-approved vaccines (16). confidence level (1.96 for a confidence level of 95%-value
commonly used); p = Percentage of the prevalence,
In early March 2020, studies documented over 3300 expressed as a decimal (Prevalence of good KAP is 0.8 as in
confirmed healthcare workers cases in China met as high as previous studies Bloom's cut-off of 80% was used to
19% in the USA. Infection and mortality of Healthcare workers determine sufficient knowledge, positive attitude and good
(HCWs) worldwide from COVID-19 are also very high. A global practice (20, 21)), C=Allowable absolute error expressed as a
study found 152888 infections and 1413 deaths among HCWs. decimal (0.06), after considering six percent allowable
Infections were mainly in women (71.6%) and nurses (38.6%), standard error. By this formula, the sample size was 170.66.
but deaths were mainly in men (70.8%) and doctors (51.4%) Therefore, we enrolled 171 participants in our study. Stratified
(17). Gholami et al. (2020) reported that 51.7% HCWs were random sampling was applied among different cadres of
found to be infected with COVID-19 during the first six months HCWs to have equitable distribution as maximum as possible.
of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a prevalence of
hospitalization of 15.1% and mortality of 1.5% (18). Procedure. A self-administered questionnaire was
used; it was developed after reviewing previously conducted
Guidelines for the prevention and control of COVID- research and visiting WHO websites for frequently asked
19 for HCWs were published by the WHO and the Ministry of questions (16, 22). The questionnaire had fifteen questions for
Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW, India) to strengthen knowledge (K1-K15), ten questions for attitude (A1-A10), and
further preventive strategies, including raising awareness and seven questions for practice (P1-P7) assessment. Each
training healthcare workers in preparedness activities. The knowledge, attitude, and practice item had three options in
WHO and MoHFW (India) have initiated several online training natural order (Ordinal categorical data). A Likert-type scale
sessions and materials on COVID-19 in various languages (6, was used to assess attitude and practice (23).
19).
These questions for knowledge, attitude, and
HCWs are the frontline workers and their knowledge, practice assessment were answered in the form of Yes, No, or
attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding the COVID-19 I don't know. Correct answers had 3 points, while incorrect
pandemic plays an essential role in managing COVID-19. answers were allocated 1 point, and no opinion answer had 2
Although many researchers have studied COVID-19 among points. Eventually, the overall knowledge score ranged from
HCWs, studies from different parts of the world on KAPs in 15 to 45. Individuals scoring less than 39 were categorized as
COVID-19 among HCWs are still needed. Therefore, we having low knowledge, 39 to 40 as having moderate
conducted this descriptive cross-sectional study to assess knowledge, and above 41 as enjoying high knowledge of
KAP among HCWs regarding the COVID-19 pandemic at a COVID-19. The total attitude score ranged from 10 to 30. A
National Institute of North India. score of under 26, 26 to 28, and above 28 was classified as low,
moderate, and high attitudes towards COVID-19, respectively.
Materials and methods The total practice score ranged from 07 to 21. Total scores of
fewer than 13, 13 to 15, and above15 were classified as weak,
This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted moderate, and strong practices towards COVID-19,
from August 2020 to July 2021 at the Department of respectively (24).
Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, National Institute of
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (NITRD). The study Data Collection Process. The questionnaire was
included HCWs of the national institute of North India, such as given to HCWs, who filled in the responses in the researcher's
safaikaramchari, multi-tasking staff (MTS), ward boys, presence. After the completion of responses, questionnaires
laboratory technicians, pharmacists, nurses, and resident were collected within fifteen minutes. The questionnaire was
doctors. HCWs working in the institute aged between 20-60 pretested on 20 HCWs who were excluded from the analysis;
years were included in the study. HCWs that refuse to the internal consistency of the study questionnaire was
participate were excluded from the study. assessed by calculating the Cronbach alpha.
Ethics Statement. Approval for the study was Data Analysis. Once all necessary data were
obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC). obtained, they were checked for completeness, and normal
Table 2
Composite Level of KAP Score
Total score Level (%), n=171
Number of Range of
Variables
questions score (Mean ± SD*) Poor Moderate Excellent
Knowledge 15 32-45 42.76 ± 2.140 4(2.34%) 51(29.82%) 116(67.84%)
Attitude 10 22-30 28.91 ± 1.594 7(4.09%) 51(29.82%) 113(66.08%)
Practice 7 13-21 20.38 ± 1.468 0 6(3.51%) 165(96.49%)
*SD: Standard Deviation.
Among HCWs, 31(18.12%) were resident doctors, Knowledge score was maximum for resident doctors
47(27.48%) each were nurses & ward boys, 22(12.86%) were (44.09±1.13) compared to others. MTS (29.35±1.4), laboratory
laboratory technicians, 14(8.2%) were MTS, 9(5.3%) were technicians (29.31±1.21), and ward boys (29.29±1.55) had
safaikaramchari and 1(0.58%) was pharmacist. Most of the better attitude scores than resident doctors (28.74±1.50).
HCWs used Television (n=48; 28.07%), Newspaper & television Nurses and safaikaramacharis had low attitude scores of
(n=42; 24.56%), MoHFW& WHO website (n=21; 12.28%), and 28.44±1.69 and 28.11±1.96, respectively (Table 3).
social media (n=11; 6.43%) as the preferred main source of
information on COVID-19. Association of knowledge (P<0.001) and attitude
score (P=0.01) of HCWs with their profession were found to be
The mean score for knowledge, attitude, and statistically significant, whereas practice score with
practice for COVID-19 were 42.76±2.14 (range =0-45), profession was statistically non-significant. On subgroup
28.91±1.59 (range =0-30), and 20.38±1.46 (range =0-21), analysis, comparing resident doctors with respect to others, it
respectively. The cut-off for excellent knowledge score, was found that resident doctors' knowledge score was
attitude score &practice score was above 41, 28, & 15, significantly higher than all other professionals except MTS.
respectively. The knowledge score of 69.1%, attitude score of The attitude score of resident doctors did not differ
66.1%, and practice score of 97.1% were excellent among significantly compared to other professionals. However, for
HCWs (Table 2). practice, nurses and MTS fared well than resident doctors
significantly, with P=0.01 and P=0.03, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3
Effect of Profession on KAP score
# $
Profession Minimum Maximum Mean±SD* P P
Resident Doctor 41 45 44.09±1.13 NA
Nurse 39 45 43.34±1.63 0.002
Pharmacist 43 43 43 NA
Knowledge
laboratory technician 36 45 42.50±2.17 <0.001 0.002
score
Ward Boy 36 45 41.53±1.92 <.0001
MTS 41 45 43.85±1.29 0.53
SafaiKaramchari 32 45 40.44±3.84 <.0001
Resident Doctor 24 30 28.74±1.50 NA
NURSE 24 30 28.44±1.69 0.21
Pharmacist 30 30 30 NA
Attitude
Laboratory Technician 25 30 29.31±1.21 0.01 0.06
score
Ward Boy 22 30 29.29±1.55 0.06
MTS 26 30 29.35±1.44 0.2
SafaiKaramchari 24 30 28.11±1.96 0.3
Resident Doctor 13 21 19.83±2.20 NA
Nurse 16 21 20.70±.85 0.01
Pharmacist 21 21 21 NA
Practice
laboratory technician 14 21 20.13±1.80 0.09 0.3
score
Ward Boy 14 21 20.34±1.37 0.1
MTS 20 21 20.92±.267 0.03
SafaiKaramchari 18 21 20.44±1.13 0.13
*SD: Standard Deviation. #P<0.05 was considered to indicate significance (ANOVA Test applied).
$P<0.05 was considered to indicate significance (T-test applied). Bold values show significant differences.
Knowledge and attitude scores of HCWs were statistically score was not associated with the level of education. Age and
significantly associated with a higher level of education marital status did not affect KAP scores (Table 4).
(P<0.001) & (P=0.02), respectively. However, the practice
Table 4
Effect of Age, Marital status, and level of Education on KAP Score
Knowledge # Attitude # Practice #
Characteristics N (%) P P P
(Mean±SD*) (Mean±SD*) (Mean±SD*)
20-29 76 (44.4) 42.68±2.11 28.93±1.73 20.37±1.41
Age Group 30-39 47 (27.5) 43.26±1.76 29.11±1.37 20.28±1.87
(Years) 40-49 28 (16.4) 42.82±2.70 28.50±1.73 20.43±1.16
> 50 20 (11.7) 42.30±2.43 0.33 28.95±1.31 0.45 20.60±0.94 0.87
Marital Married 109 (64) 42.73±2.22 28.85±1.49 20.39±1.45
Status Unmarried 62 (36) 42.96±2.08 0.5 29.01±1.76 0.52 20.35±1.50 0.86
Postgraduate 47 (27.5) 43.85±1.25 28.49±1.76 20.21±1.74
University 33 (19.3) 43.09±1.40 29.18±1.10 20.42±1.45
Intermediate 30 (17.5) 42.77±1.97 28.50±1.87 20.47±0.93
Level of
Education High School
39 (22.8) 42.31±2.27 <0.001 29.49±1.25 0.02 20.44±1.68 0.92
Education
Less than high
22 (12.9) 41.18±3.36 28.95±1.67 20.45±1.05
school education
*SD: Standard Deviation. #P values were calculated using a student t-test between two groups and an ANOVA test for more than two groups. P<0.05 was
considered to indicate significance. Bold values show significant differences.
Superscripts
Multivariate linear regression reaffirms that knowledge and Practice sore of female HCWs was significantly
attitude scores were significantly associated with profession associated with their knowledge. In this study, we found a
(P <0.001 and P=0.04) and level of education (P value positive correlation between knowledge and attitude score,
<0.001and P=0.01), respectively. Gender was associated with and a significantly positive correlation was found (Figure 1).
practice scores (P=0.03) (Table 5).
Table 5
Multivariate linear regression of demographic characteristics with KAP
Variables Knowledge Attitude Practice
Unstandardized Unstandardized Unstandardized
coefficient P* coefficient P* coefficient P*
# # #
(95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI)
-0.016 -0.03 0.039
Age (Year) 0.67 0.56 0.48
(-.090 to .059) (-.130 to .071) (-.072 to .150)
Gender -0.017 -0.021 0.055
0.32 0.37 0.03
(Male/Female) (-.052 to .017) (-.068 to .025) (.004 to .106)
-0.389 0.207 0.178
Professions <0.001 0.04 0.11
(-.538 to -.239) (.005 to .409) (-.044 to .400)
Marital Status 0.012 0.014 -0.01
0.5 0.54 0.7
(Married/Unmarried) (-.023 to .046) (-.032 to .061) (-.061 to .042)
-0.273 0.154 0.111
Level of Education <0.001 0.01 0.1
(-.364 to -.182) (.031 to .276) (-.024 to .247)
*P<0.05 was considered to indicate significance. Bold values show significant differences.
#CI: Confidence Interval.
Figure 1 Discussion
Correlation scatters among knowledge, attitude, and practice
of HCWs. A: Knowledge vs. Attitude, B: Knowledge vs. HCWs are the frontline warriors in the battle against
Practice, C: Attitude vs. Practice COVID-19. They are exposed to occupational hazards,
including exposure to SARS-CoV-2, stigma and discrimination
in society, heavy workload, and prolonged use of personal
protective equipment (PPE) (World Health Organisation
2020c). A poor understanding of the disease among HCWs
results in delayed identification and treatment and may lead
to a greater risk of spreading the disease. As an essential part
of the health care system, HCWs' KAP plays a vital role in
preventing and spreading COVID-19.
adequate knowledge were male gender, nurse, doctor, and score was significantly associated with both attitude and
IPC training. practice scores.
In this study, the attitude score was statistically Attitude score was significantly associated with
significantly associated with profession (P=0.01) and practice score. In another study, Pham A. et al. (34) in Vietnam
education level (P=0.02). This study's attitude score agrees found that those with sufficient knowledge and a positive
with the results from earlier studies. A study by Almohammed attitude towards COVID-19 were more likely to have good
A. et al. (29) found that the participants from the nursing preventive practices. Asdaq S. et al. (36) found that the
profession demonstrated a less favorable attitude. Among attitude score increased significantly with an improvement in
nurses, a master's degree is related to more positive attitudes. knowledge. Besides, there was a greater association between
Ahmed F. et al. (25) found among HCWs that a positive attitudes and practices. A significant enhancement in the
attitude was predicted by sound knowledge and female practice score of the professionals was noted with an increase
gender. In another study, Hussain I. et al. (23) found that in knowledge score, an indicator of a positive correlation
attitudes toward COVID-19 significantly differed with age, between practice and knowledge scores.
marital status, profession, hospital, and residential place.
In this study, the primary source of knowledge and
Similarly, Haghighi F. et al. (29), found male gender information among HCWs was Television (n=48; 28.1%),
was correlated with more correct attitudes. Tamang N.et al. followed by Newspaper & television (n=42; 24.6%), MoHFW
(30) found that positive attitudes were significantly (n=21; 12.3%), WHO website & social media (n=11; 6.4%). Similar
associated with online courses related to COVID-19. results are shown by Kaihan Y. et al. (37), who found Mass
Conversely, Basnet S. et al. (32) found that the HCWs with a media as the primary source of knowledge and information on
clinical experience level of one to five years or more were COVID-19. This corroborates with a study by Abhisek S. et al.
significantly associated with a negative attitude. (38), which showed that more than three fourth (82.1%) of the
participants reported their primary source of knowledge was
In this study, practice score was not associated with news media, while only less than half of the participants
profession and level of education. Nurses and MTS had (44.9%) reported government official websites. In another
significantly better practice scores than resident doctors. study , Albahri A.et al. (39) found that official health
Practice score among female HCWs was significantly organizations were the primary source of information for
correlated with their knowledge. Similar results were shown 91.5% (161/176) of participants, and only 38.1% (67/176)
by Maheshwari S. et al. (33), that gender had a significant reported using scientific journals as one of their sources.
impact on practice scores (P <0.05). Pham A. et al. (34) found
that the female participants, and the receiving of information Few other studies found social media as the primary
from the official websites, reported a significantly higher level source of information. Khasawneh A. et al. (40) found medical
of good practice. Haghighi F. et al. (31) found that 2 - 5 years of students used primarily social media (83.4%) and online search
work experience was associated with better practice among engines (84.8%) as their preferred source of information on
nurses. Conversely, in another study Almohammed A. et al. COVID-19 and relied less on medical search engines (64.1%).
(29), found males were more likely to practice most of the Huynh G. et al. (41) found that HCWs predominantly used
time appropriately. social media to inform themselves about COVID-19 (91.1%).
Alrubaiee G. et al. (42) found that 57.1% of the respondents
In a study, Tamang N. et al. (30) reported that obtained their information via social networks and news
profession, education of master's degree or above, and online media, and a further 60.0% had never attended lectures/
courses are statistically significantly associated with practice discussions about COVID-19.
scores (p < 0.05). In another study, Hussain I. et al. (23) found
a significant difference in practice scores across the Limitations of the study. HCWs may have good
participants' age, educational level, hospital, and residence. In practice scores in our specialty hospital institute. This may lead
a study by Ronald Olum et al. (21), they found factors to excellent to good practice scores. Stratified random
associated with good practices were an age of 40 years or sampling was applied among the different cadre of HCWs to
more and holding a diploma. Ahmed F. et al. (25) found among have equitable distribution as maximum as possible to reduce
HCWs that practice was associated with good knowledge of selection bias. In this study, the data presented were partly
COVID-19. dependent on the participants' honesty, recall ability, and
self-reported, which could have resulted in recall bias. In most
In this study, we found a positive correlation cross-sectional questionnaire-based studies, inherent recall
between knowledge and attitude and a significantly positive bias is expected. The actual practice section of the HCWs is
correlation between knowledge and practice (r=0.188, different from the practice score of the study, as the
p=0.01). These results are consistent with the results of a participants report them. Thus, to provide further depth in this
previous study by Wahed et al. (35), which found a positive section, the observing and auditing approach of the
correlation between knowledge and attitude scores (r=0.215, participants is needed. No previously validated tools
p<0.001). Other researchers found a significant association assessing KAP about COVID-19 among HCWs in hospitals have
between knowledge, attitude, and practice, corroborating determined a cut-off point for adequate or excellent
with the studies (25, 30), which found that the knowledge knowledge, positive attitude, and an appropriate level of
19. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 30. Tamang N, Rai P, Dhungana S et al. COVID-19: a National
(MoHFW). Available at Survey on perceived level of knowledge, attitude and
https://www .google.com/search?q=mohfw&oq=mohfw& practice among frontline healthcare Workers in Nepal. BMC
aqs=chrome.69i57j46i131i199i433i465i512j0i512l3j69i60l3. Public Health. 2020;20(1):1905.
3312j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 31. Haghighi KF, Kouhi P, Amini M et al. Knowledge, Attitude,
20. Feleke BT, Wale MZ, Yirsaw MT. Knowledge, attitude and and Practice Toward COVID-19 Among Healthcare Workers
preventive practice towards COVID-19 and associated in Shiraz, Iran. Shiraz E-Med J. 2020;21(12).
factors among outpatient service visitors at Debre Markos 32. Basnet S, Dahal S, Tamrakar D et al. Knowledge, Attitude,
compressive specialized hospital, north-west Ethiopia, and Practices Related to COVID-19 among Healthcare
2020. PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0251708. doi: Personnel in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nepal: A Cross-
10.1371/journal.pone.0251708. PMID: 34264940; PMCID: sectional Survey . Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ).
PMC8282282. 2020;18(70):21–28.
21. Olum R, Chekwech G, Wekha G et al. Coronavirus Disease- 33. Maheshwari S, Gupta PK, Sinha R et al. knowledge,
2019: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Health Care attitude, and practice towards coronavirus disease 2019
Workers at Makerere University Teaching Hospitals, (COVID-19) among medical students: A cross-sectional
Uganda. Front Public Health. 2020;8:181. study. J Acute Dis. 2020;9(3):100.
22. World Health Organization (WHO). Infection prevention 34. Le-An P, Huynh G, Nguyen HTN et al. Knowledge, Attitude,
and control during health care when novel coronavirus and Practice Towards COVID-19 Among Healthcare
(nCoV) infection is suspected: interim guidance. 2020. Students in Vietnam. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:3405–13.
Available at https://www.who.int/publications-detail- 35. Wahed WYA, Hefzy EM, Ahmed MI et al. Assessment of
redirect/10665-331495 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perception of Health Care
23. Hussain I, Majeed A, Imran I et al. Knowledge, Attitude, Workers Regarding COVID-19, A Cross-Sectional Study from
and Practices Toward COVID-19 in Primary Healthcare Egypt. J Community Health. 2020;45(6):1242–51.
Providers: A Cross-Sectional Study from Three Tertiary Care 36. Asdaq SMB, Alshrari AS, Imran M et al. Knowledge,
Hospitals of Peshawar, Pakistan. J Community Health. attitude and practices of healthcare professionals of
2021;46(3):441–449. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00879-9. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia towards covid-19: A cross-sectional
24. Erfani A, Shahriarirad R, Ranjbar K et al. Knowledge, study. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(9):5275–82.
Attitude and Practice toward the Novel Coronavirus 37. Yang K, Liu H, Ma L et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice
(COVID-19) Outbreak: A Population-Based Survey in Iran. of residents in the prevention and control of COVID‐19: An
B u l l Wo r l d H e a l t h O r g a n . 2 0 2 0 ; E - p u b . 1 0 . 2 4 7 1 / online questionnaire survey. J Adv Nurs. 2021; 77(4):
BLT.20.256651. doi: 1839–55. doi: 10.1111/jan.14718.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.256651. 38. Singh A, Panika R, Surana A et al. Evaluation of knowledge
25. Tsiga-Ahmed FI, Amole TG, Musa BM et al. COVID 19: and perceptions among medical undergraduate students
Evaluating the Knowledge, Attitude and Preventive toward novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in Southern Haryana,
Practices of Healthcare Workers in Northern Nigeria. Int J India: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Health Sci Biomed
MCH AIDS. 2021;10(1):88–97. doi: 10.21106/ijma.418. Res KLEU. 2020;13(2):91.
26. Malik UR, Atif N, Hashmi FK et al. Knowledge, Attitude, 39. Albahri AH, Alnaqbi SA, Alnaqbi SA et al. Knowledge,
and Practices of Healthcare Professionals on COVID-19 and Attitude, and Practice Regarding COVID-19 Among
Risk Assessment to Prevent the Epidemic Spread: A Healthcare Workers in Primary Healthcare Centers in Dubai:
Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study from Punjab, Pakistan. A Cross-Sectional Survey, 2020. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:6395. doi: 10.3390/ 617679.
ijerph17176395. 40. Khasawneh AI, Humeidan AA, Alsulaiman JW et al. Medical
27. Zhang M, Zhou M, Tang F et al. knowledge, attitude, and Students and COVID-19: Knowledge, Attitudes, and
practice regarding COVID-19 among healthcare workers in Precautionary Measures. A Descriptive Study From Jordan.
Henan, China. J Hosp Infect. 2020;105(2):183–7. doi: Front Public Health. 2020;8:253. doi:
10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.012. 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00253.
28. Mushi A, Yassin Y, Khan A et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and 41. Huynh G, Nguyen TH, Tran V et al. knowledge and attitude
Perceived Risks Towards COVID-19 Pandemic and the toward COVID-19 among healthcare workers at District 2
Impact of Risk Communication Messages on Healthcare Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City. Asian Pac J Trop Med.
Workers in Saudi Arabia. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13(6):260.
2021;14:2811–24. 42. Alrubaiee GG, Al-Qalah TAH, Al-Aawar MSA. Knowledge,
29. Almohammed OA, Aldwihi LA, Alragas AM et al. attitudes, anxiety, and preventive behaviours towards
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Associated With COVID-19 among health care providers in Yemen: an online
COVID-19 Among Healthcare Workers in Hospitals: A Cross- cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1541.
Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia. Front Public Health.
2021;9:643053.