Limiting AC Temperatures Is A Misguided Attempt at Solving A Real
Limiting AC Temperatures Is A Misguided Attempt at Solving A Real
themorningcontext.com/yesterday/limiting-ac-temperatures-is-a-misguided-attempt-at-solving-a-real-problem
Union minister Manohar Lak Khattar on Tuesday said that India will
experiment with standardization of AC temperatures, restricting them from
going below 20 degrees Celsius or above 28 degrees Celsius. This move is
aimed at reducing excessive power consumption.
The move draws from the Bureau of Energy Efficiency finding that the
comfort range for AC temperatures is between 24 and 25 degrees Celsius
and increasing AC temperature by just 1 degree Celsius can save about 6%
of electricity consumption.
But there are many factors that affect the efficiency of air conditioners and
the thermostat temperature setting is only one of them. Putting a restriction
on thermostat temperature thus is a short-sighted move that doesn’t really
take into account other factors that affect AC efficiency.
Longread
BlissClub’s niche is going to be its Achilles' heel
Explore Longread
Between 8% and 10% of the 300 million households in the country have an
air conditioner but that is expected to reach close to 50% by 2037. The
International Energy Agency predicts that India will have more than 1 billion
ACs in operation by 2050. The solution for increasing temperatures creates
another problem—a massive spike in power demand.
The biggest source of new electricity demand in India is coming from air
conditioning, outpacing both transport and data centres. ACs account for
about a fifth of the peak electricity load and, in recent years, demand for
electricity has outpaced generation capacity. This means that power
shortages are projected to sharply increase during the hottest months of the
year.
Even if India’s electricity generation were to keep pace with the appetite for
ACs, it doesn’t change the fact that the electricity consumed by the
appliances would further exacerbate climate change, making the sweltering
summer months even more unbearable.
News Brief
Air India’s AI171 tragedy leaves behind lost lives, unanswered questions
A better parameter: Besides setting a minimum ISEER level for ACs sold
in the market, as Singhal mentions, there is also a case to be made for
energy efficiency standards to be improved to include another important
feature—dehumidification.
“We do not really require 20 degrees, people would feel comfortable at 24.
But you also need to look at dehumidification. Even if you set a temperature
of 20 or even 16, if the humidity is high, it might still feel hot, So that is
where the larger dissatisfaction of consumers comes into play. But right
now, ISEER does not take into account dehumidification. If you also account
for dehumidification as an efficiency parameter, the gains could be much
more tangible,” says Singhal.
So limiting the minimum ISEER rating with which an AC can be sold and
creating an efficiency standard that takes into account dehumidification are
two steps that can go much further than a limit on thermostat temperature.
But there is a clear downside to both; it would mean that ACs could end up
being more expensive than they already are.
What this high tax rate does is that it pushes consumers to buy cheaper
and, therefore, less efficient ACs. If instead, the tax on ACs was tied to
something like ISEER ratings, it could mean that more efficient ACs would
be cheaper and more affordable and accessible for customers.
“That is one of the key things that we have been trying to push for. Right
now, ACs are taxed at 28%. If you buy a 40,000 rupee machine, around
10,000 is just taxes that you pay on it. Even if it was reduced to 20%, it
could be a game changer,” says Singhal. “I am not saying you tax every AC
at a lower bracket but let’s say the super efficient ones, the five-star ones
have a lower tax on them.”
At the end of the day, it is very important that we tackle the huge expected
increase in power demand coming from ACs. But all three solutions that we
discussed here would take a better stab at the problem than arbitrarily
putting a limit on thermostat temperatures.