0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views7 pages

Mathematical Logic Shortlisted PPT 45-60

The document provides a detailed explanation of logical equivalences, tautologies, contradictions, and contingencies using truth tables. It includes examples of proving logical statements, examining their properties, and defining quantifiers. Additionally, it discusses the concept of duality in logical statements.

Uploaded by

Bhavesh padhiyar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views7 pages

Mathematical Logic Shortlisted PPT 45-60

The document provides a detailed explanation of logical equivalences, tautologies, contradictions, and contingencies using truth tables. It includes examples of proving logical statements, examining their properties, and defining quantifiers. Additionally, it discusses the concept of duality in logical statements.

Uploaded by

Bhavesh padhiyar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

# Prove that the followings are identical:

(i) ~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q

Solution:

p q ~p ~q p∨q ~(p ∨ q) ~p ∧ ~q

T T F F T F F
T F F T T F F
F T T F T F F

F F T T F T T

(ii) ~(p ∧ q) ≡ ~p ∨ ~q

# Using truth tables, prove the following logical equivalences :

(p ∧ q) ≡ ~ (p → ~ q)
p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
1.

(p ∧ q) → r ≡ p → (q → r)
2.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
3.
4.
# Tautology :
A statement pattern having truth value always T, irrespective of the truth values
of its component statement is called Tautology.
For example, consider (p ↔ q) ↔ (q ↔ p)
p q p↔q q↔p (p ↔ q) ↔ (q ↔ p)

T T T T T
T F F F T
F T F F T

F F T T T
In the above truth table, all the entries in the last column are T.
∴ The given statement pattern is a tautology

# Contradiction :
A statement pattern having truth value always F, irrespective of the truth values
of its component statement is called a Contradiction.
For example, consider p ∧ ~ p

p ~p p∧~p

T F F

F T F

In the above truth table, all the entries in the last column are F.
∴ The given statement pattern is a Contradiction.
# Contingency :
A statement pattern which is neither a tautology nor a contradiction is called
Contingency.
For example, consider (p ↔ q) ∧ ~(p → ~ q)

p q p↔q ~q p →~q ~(p → ~q) (p ↔ q) ∧~(p


→~q)

T T T F F T T
T F F T T F F
F T F F T F F

F F T T T F F

In the above truth table, the entries in the last column are a combination of T
and F.
∴ The given statement pattern is neither a tautology nor a contradiction, it is a
contingency

# Using truth tables examine whether the following statement


patterns are tautology, contradiction or contingency.

1. (p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (p → q)….Ans. Contradiction

2. (~p ∧ q) ∧ (q → p) …Ans. Contradiction

3. (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)…Ans. Contingency

4. [(p ∨ q) ∨ r] ↔ [p ∨ (q ∨ r)]… Ans. Tautology

5. (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)… Ans. Contingency


# Prepare the truth table of the following statement patterns :
1. (p ↔ r) ∧ (q ↔ p)

(p ↔ r) ∧(q ↔
p q r p↔r q↔p

p)

T T T T T T

T T F F T F
T F T T F F
T F F F F F
F T T F F F
F T F T F F
F F T F T F

F F F T T T

# Prepare the truth table of the following statement patterns :

1. [(p → q) ∧ q] → p

2. (p ∧ q) → (~p)

3. (p → q) ↔ (~p ∨ q)

4. (p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)
# Quantifiers :
Quantifiers are the symbols used to denote a
group of words or a phrase. Generally, two types of
quantifiers are used. They are as follows:
1. Universal Quantifier
2. Existential Quantifier

1. Universal Quantifier:

For example, Consider A = {1, 2, 3} Let p: ∀ x ∈ A, x < 4


The symbol „∀‟ stands for “all values of” and is known as universal quantifier.

Here, the statement p uses the quantifier „for all‟(∀).


This statement is true if and only if each and every element of set A satisfies the
condition „x < 4‟ and is false otherwise.

3 satisfy the condition, „x ∈ A, x < 4‟.


Here the given statement is true for all the elements of set A, as 1, 2,

2. Existential Quantifier :
The symbol „∃‟ stands for „there exists‟ and is known as existential quantifier.
For example, Consider A = {4, 14, 66, 70}.
Let p: ∃ x ∈ A such that x is an odd number.
Here, the statement p uses the quantifier „there exists‟ (∃).
This statement is true if at least one element of set A satisfies the
condition „x is an odd number‟ and is false otherwise.

satisfy the condition,„x ∈ A such that x is an odd number‟.


Here, the given statement is false as none of the elements of set A

# Quantified statement :
The statement containing quantifiers is known as quantified statement.
Generally, an open sentence with a quantifier becomes a statement
and is called quantified statement.
For example:
Use quantifiers to convert open sentence x + 2 < 4 into a statement.

∃ x ∈ N such that x + 2 < 4, is a true statement, since x = 1 ∈ N


Solution:

satisfies x + 2 < 4.

Example-1 If A = {3, 4, 6, 8}, determine the truth value of each of

1. ∃ x ∈ A, such that x + 4 = 7
the following:

Ans. Since x = 3 ∈ A, satisfies x + 4 = 7


∴ The given statement is true.
∴ Its truth value is „T‟.

2. ∀ x ∈ A, x + 4 < 10.
Ans. Since x = 6, 8 ∈ A, do not satisfy x + 4 < 10,
∴ The given statement is false.
∴ Its truth value is „F‟

3.∀ x ∈ A, x + 5 ≥ 13…Ans.F
4. ∃ x ∈ A, such that x is odd…Ans.T
5. ∃ x ∈ A, such that (x − 3) ∈ N…Ans.T

# Duality :
Two compound statements S1 and S2 are said to be duals of each other, if
one can be obtained from the other by interchanging „∧‟ and „∨‟ and
vice- versa.
The connectives „∧‟ and „∨‟ are duals of each other.
Also, a dual is obtained by replacing t by c and c by t, where „t‟ denotes
tautology and „c‟ denotes contradiction.

Remarks:
1. The symbol „∼‟ is not changed while finding the dual.
2. Dual of a dual is the statement itself.
3. The special statements „t‟ (tautology) and „c‟ (contradiction) are
duals of each other.
4. T is changed to F and vice-versa.

You might also like