0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views2 pages

Circumstances For Refusing Injunction and Granting

The document outlines the grounds for granting and refusing injunctions, emphasizing the necessity of a prima facie case, proof of irreparable injury, and the balance of convenience among other factors. It also details circumstances under which injunctions may be denied, such as ongoing judicial proceedings, legislative applications, and lack of personal interest. Key principles include the Clean Hands Doctrine and the importance of public interest in the decision to grant an injunction.

Uploaded by

haldergaurav5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views2 pages

Circumstances For Refusing Injunction and Granting

The document outlines the grounds for granting and refusing injunctions, emphasizing the necessity of a prima facie case, proof of irreparable injury, and the balance of convenience among other factors. It also details circumstances under which injunctions may be denied, such as ongoing judicial proceedings, legislative applications, and lack of personal interest. Key principles include the Clean Hands Doctrine and the importance of public interest in the decision to grant an injunction.

Uploaded by

haldergaurav5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Grounds for Granting Injunction:

1. Prima Facie Case: The plaintiff must show that their case is likely to succeed based on
initial evidence. Though not explicitly stated, this principle is fundamental in all
equitable relief cases. Illustration: If a plaintiff produces valid property documents
showing ownership, a court may grant an injunction to prevent trespassing.

2. Irreparable Injury: The plaintiff must prove that without the injunction, they would
suffer harm that cannot be compensated monetarily. Provision: This concept is inherent
in Section 37 (Temporary and Perpetual Injunctions). Illustration: Demolishing a
heritage building would cause irreparable loss to cultural value.

3. Balance of Convenience: The court assesses which party would face greater harm from
granting or denying the injunction. Illustration: If pollution from a factory harms nearby
farms, an injunction could prioritize the farmers' convenience over delaying factory
operations.

4. No Delay or Laches: If the plaintiff delays taking legal action after the harm begins, the
court may refuse relief. Illustration: A landowner who waits years to challenge an
encroachment may not be granted an injunction due to the delay.

5. Clean Hands Doctrine: Plaintiffs must demonstrate honesty and fairness in the matter
to qualify for equitable relief. Provision: Section 41(i) disqualifies plaintiffs acting in bad
faith. Illustration: Someone who falsifies evidence cannot be granted an injunction.

6. Public Interest: Injunctions are denied if granting them harms the public interest.
Provision: Section 41(ha) prevents injunctions from obstructing public infrastructure or
welfare projects. Illustration: An individual grievance cannot halt construction of a
public hospital.

7. Adequate Remedy: If a legal remedy other than an injunction exists (like monetary
compensation), an injunction is denied except in trust breaches. Provision: Section
41(h) specifically mentions this ground. Illustration: A plaintiff seeking damages for a
contract breach would not need an injunction.

circumstances for Refusing Injunction (Section 41):

1. Judicial Proceedings (Clause a)

o Injunction cannot restrain a person from prosecuting judicial proceedings


pending at the time of filing the suit unless it prevents multiplicity of such
proceedings.
2. Proceedings in Other Courts (Clause b)

o Courts cannot grant an injunction restraining proceedings in a court that is not


subordinate to the court granting relief.

3. Legislative Applications (Clause c)

o No injunction is granted to restrain a person from applying to legislative bodies.

4. Criminal Proceedings (Clause d) o Injunctions cannot halt the institution or

prosecution of criminal cases.

5. Unenforceable Contracts (Clause e)

o Preventing a breach of contracts not capable of specific enforcement is not


grounds for injunction.

6. Unclear Nuisance Claims (Clause f)

o Courts will not grant an injunction against acts that are not reasonably clear as
constituting a nuisance.

7. Acquiescence by Plaintiff (Clause g)

o Injunctions are denied if the plaintiff has knowingly allowed a continuing breach.

8. Equally Efficacious Remedy (Clause h)

o Relief will not be granted if the plaintiff can obtain a suitable remedy by another
usual mode, except in cases of breach of trust.

9. Infrastructure Projects (Clause ha)

o Injunctions will not impede progress or completion of infrastructure projects or


related facilities/services.

10. Disentitled by Conduct (Clause i)

o Plaintiffs acting in bad faith or with conduct that disqualifies them cannot seek
injunction.

11. No Personal Interest (Clause j)

o If the plaintiff has no personal stake in the subject matter, injunction is denied.

You might also like