INTRODUCTION
Focus of mobile communication shifted from high data rates to managing connected
devices.
Exponential increase in traffic volume expected, reaching 1000-fold by 2020.
Anticipated 50 billion connected devices by 2021.
II. MASSIVE MACHINE TYPE COMMUNICATIONS
(mMTC)
Previous generations overlooked energy consumption in network scenarios.
ICT industry projected to consume 30% of global power by 2025.
Small cells will replace 4G with 5G, increasing installations to 13.1 million by 2025.
Massive MIMO increases power consumption due to additional hardware.
Need for efficient resource management and spectral sharing for energy efficiency.
Virtualization can lead to energy savings by reducing hardware deployment.
Machine learning techniques are essential for optimizing network operations.
Supervised and unsupervised learning approaches can enhance energy efficiency in 5G.
III. MOTIVATION
Connected devices expected to reach 20.4 billion by 2020, with 3.5 billion smartphone
users.
User data projected to quadruple by 2025, emphasizing energy efficiency in 5G.
Machine learning can address challenges in 5G networks for energy efficiency.
Intelligent networks are needed to adapt and optimize energy use.
Energy efficiency is crucial for both economic and ecological reasons.
IV. NOVELTY AND CONTRIBUTION
Limited studies on energy efficiency across the entire network spectrum.
Detailed discussion on machine learning applications for energy efficiency in 5G.
V. ARTICLE ORGANIZATION
High frequencies used in small cells for improved data rates and spectrum utilization.
Massive MIMO enhances performance but faces challenges like interference
management.
Decoupling hardware from network functions improves scalability and flexibility.
VI. ENERGY CONSUMPTION OVERVIEW
Base station ON/OFF strategy effectively saves energy based on traffic patterns.
China Mobile's strategy saved around 36 million kWh since 2009.
5G networks face challenges in energy-efficient practices due to technology
heterogeneity.
VII. QUEST FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Energy consumption projected to rise by 21% by 2030.
3G networks initiated energy efficiency research, improving with CDMA.
Multi-user MIMO and OFDM enhance energy efficiency in 5G.
VIII. COMPARISON WITH TRADITIONAL
APPROACHES
Software development for new applications is costly and resource-intensive.
IX. MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES FOR
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Supervised learning is effective for known problems; reinforcement learning suits
unknown issues.
Machine learning can solve complex problems in resource allocation and management.
X. ENERGY EFFICIENCY OVERVIEW
Energy consumption increases with bandwidth, necessitating efficient technologies like
massive MIMO.
Resource allocation strategies can enhance energy efficiency and reduce carbon
footprints.
Various projects initiated to improve energy efficiency in 5G networks.
XI. GREEN METRICS
ITU focuses on reducing energy consumption and environmental impact in
telecommunications.
ETSI aims for energy efficiency throughout the telecom lifecycle.
XII. TAXONOMY
Overview of energy efficiency solutions in 5G using machine learning.
XIII. CORE NETWORK
1) SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKING (SDN)
Centralized management of applications enhances real-time adaptability.
SDN faces challenges like increased overhead and congestion.
Proposed frameworks aim to improve traffic management and energy efficiency.
2) NETWORK FUNCTION VIRTUALIZATION (NFV)
NFV reduces energy consumption by eliminating dedicated hardware.
Efficient resource management is crucial for maintaining quality of service.
XIV. ACCESS NETWORK
1) MASSIVE MIMO
Massive MIMO enhances spectrum efficiency but poses energy efficiency challenges.
Deep learning approaches optimize power allocation based on user location.
2) COVERAGE GAPS
Network architecture and deployment impact energy efficiency.
Resource management is essential for effective user association in HetNets.
3) mmWave
mmWave offers high data rates but is sensitive to environmental factors.
Hybrid precoding techniques enhance energy efficiency in mmWave communications.
XV. EDGE NETWORK
1) CRAN
C-RAN architecture improves energy efficiency by centralizing baseband operations.
Resource allocation schemes using machine learning enhance energy efficiency and QoS.
2) MEC
MEC enhances flexibility and services by integrating with NFV and SDN.
Computational offloading improves energy efficiency and performance.
XVI. ENERGY HARVESTING
Radiofrequency signals are efficient for energy harvesting in 5G.
Energy harvesting can extend battery life for devices in machine-type communications.
XVII. FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND OPEN ISSUES
More research needed on hardware design, energy efficiency, and service chaining.
Combining technologies can lead to more energy-efficient 5G designs.
Collaboration protocols are necessary for effective MEC deployment.
XVIII. CONCLUSION
The paper surveys literature on energy efficiency in 5G networks.
A taxonomy categorizes 5G networks into access, edge, and core components.
Summary for “
DRL.pdf
”
Introduction
Heterogeneous networks (HetNets) address increasing mobile data traffic demands.
HetNets consist of various base stations (BSs) like micro, pico, and femto BSs.
Increased mobile devices lead to severe interference in uplink HetNets.
OFDMA-based HetNets are preferred in major wireless communication standards.
Conventional user association schemes lead to inefficient small BS deployment.
Uplink interference is a significant challenge in HetNets.
Power control strategies can reduce interference and improve QoS.
Joint optimization of user association and power control is crucial for performance.
Previous studies explored user association and power control in HetNets.
Q-learning and deep reinforcement learning (DRL) methods are emerging solutions.
DRL, particularly deep Q-networks (DQN), can handle large state-action spaces.
The paper proposes a multi-agent DQN approach for joint user association and power
control.
The focus is on maximizing energy efficiency in uplink OFDMA-based HetNets.
System model
The set of all BSs is denoted as M = {0, 1, 2, ..., M}.
Learning occurs via a cloud server connected to macro or small BSs.
UEs are assigned to N orthogonal subchannels; each UE accesses one subchannel.
Channel gain is affected by Rayleigh fading, log-normal shadowing, and path loss.
Binary variables represent active links between UEs and BSs.
Power consumption includes static and dynamic components.
Transmit power is set at discrete levels for practical applications.
Total power consumption for each UE includes static and dynamic power.
SINR for each UE is calculated based on noise and interference.
Data rate is derived from the Shannon capacity formula.
Problem formulation
Energy efficiency is defined as the sum of individual UEs' efficiencies.
Individual efficiency is the ratio of throughput to total power consumption.
The sum-energy efficiency maximization problem is formulated as a MINLFP.
Constraints ensure maximum transmit power and QoS requirements are met.
The problem aims to find optimal user association and power control strategies.
Multi-agent DQN for joint user association and power
control
Introduces a new reward function for the reinforcement learning process.
The multi-agent DQN approach is presented to optimize user association and power
control.
The reinforcement learning approach
Defines state space, action space, and reward function for the learning process.
State space includes all UEs' associations and power control decisions.
Action space involves controlling UE association and transmit power.
The reward function is based on the sum-energy efficiency of UEs.
The problem is transformed into a maximization problem for energy efficiency.
The agent learns optimal policies through interactions with the environment.
The Q-learning algorithm updates the Q-value function based on experiences.
Multi-agent DQN framework
The Q-function approximates the expected rewards for actions taken.
A target network stabilizes learning by maintaining constant parameters.
The behavior network updates parameters based on the minimum loss function.
Experience replay technique mitigates instability from correlated data samples.
The multi-agent DQN algorithm is detailed in a structured process.
Simulation results and analysis
DNN with two hidden layers is used to estimate the Q-function.
Performance is evaluated based on learning parameters and neuron counts.
Energy efficiency converges with increased episodes; optimal learning rate is identified.
Multi-agent DQN outperforms Q-learning in energy efficiency and learning speed.
Energy efficiency decreases with higher SINR thresholds due to increased power
consumption.
Increasing power levels improves energy efficiency by allowing better power selection.
The number of micro BSs affects energy efficiency, with optimal designs needed.
The multi-agent DQN algorithm shows superior performance across various scenarios.
Conclusion
The multi-agent DQN approach effectively solves the MINLFP problem.
It requires less communication information compared to traditional methods.
The algorithm demonstrates better convergence and energy efficiency than classical Q-
learning.
