0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views14 pages

Classicism 3

The document discusses classical theories of crime, highlighting the transition to positivist theories due to scientific advancements and inherent issues with classical approaches. It introduces contemporary classicism, particularly the New Right perspective, which emphasizes rational choice and deterrence in crime prevention, while also addressing the limitations and criticisms of these theories. The Rational Choice and Routine Activities theories are presented as dominant frameworks in criminal justice policy, focusing on crime prevention through opportunity reduction and situational factors.

Uploaded by

zita.yasmeen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views14 pages

Classicism 3

The document discusses classical theories of crime, highlighting the transition to positivist theories due to scientific advancements and inherent issues with classical approaches. It introduces contemporary classicism, particularly the New Right perspective, which emphasizes rational choice and deterrence in crime prevention, while also addressing the limitations and criticisms of these theories. The Rational Choice and Routine Activities theories are presented as dominant frameworks in criminal justice policy, focusing on crime prevention through opportunity reduction and situational factors.

Uploaded by

zita.yasmeen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

Classical Theories – Part 3

Associate Professor Guy Hall


Classical Theories

• Classical theory as an explanation of crime was soon overtaken by positivist


theories

• This occurred for two main reasons:


• Growth of science including social sciences which is covered in the lecture on positivism
• Inherent problems with classical position
Contemporary Classicism

• New Right – from the rise and rise of right wing politics

• From more sophisticated number crunching

• Rational choice

• Routine activities
New Right

• Not so much a “theory” as populist criminology.

• New right policies are simply a logical reintroduction of retributionist and utilitarian
principles.

• The fundamental proposition in criminal law is free will and thus rationality.
New Right

• Hedonism provides a simple explanation of crime.

• Deterrence is a logical basis for crime prevention.

• Punish hard and you will reduce crime!


Problems with New Right

• Increasing penalties have limited effects.

• Research has focused on deterrent effects of changing police practices,


increasing incarceration and death penalty. This research shows small increase,
small decrease or no effect on crime rates

• In any case, the small decrease is associated with massive costs which are best
spent elsewhere
Problems with New Right

• Increasing penalties may exacerbate crime.


• If punishments are increased then it may reduce reporting or increase severity of
behaviour (might as well be hung for sheep as a lamb), more tragically kill a
victim since they cannot then give evidence.
Rational Choice Theory

• Also referred to as Opportunity Theory


• Most strongly applied in crime prevention
• Not proponent of punishment
• Crime is viewed from an economic, rational choice perspective.
• People commit crimes because the benefits outweigh the disadvantages ie
simple hedonism.
• Crime is a rational, opportunistic decision based behaviour (as opposed to
pathology)
Rational Choice Theory

• People will commit crimes if:


• it is attractive
• it is accessible

It is still possible to accept that choices may be bounded and that choice making
may be pre-determined. That is, decision making is in part determined by the
characteristics of the decision maker – an acceptance of positivism.
Rational Choice Theory

• It is a crime control theory and the fundamental basis of situational crime control.

• The focus is on making the targets of crime either less attractive or less
accessible rather than focussing on the offender.

• The approach also acknowledges the importance of differences in individual


decision making and in different crimes (hence the situational perspective).
Routine Activities Theory

• It is suggested that crimes occur where

• 1. there is a convergence of likely offenders;

• 2. there are suitable targets; and

• 3. there is an absence of capable guardians


Routine Activities Theory

• Theory accounts for opportunity and modernisation (ie structure of communities


eg dormitory suburbs, shopping centres, etc)

• Focus is on prevention but includes need for deterrence & restitution


Contemporary Classicism

• The opportunity theories now dominant theories in criminal justice policy

• These theories provide considerable drive for crime prevention


Limitations

• The major criticism of the opportunity theories is that they accept the status quo
• However the response from the opportunity theorists is that they are merely trying
to limit harm in the community
• Another criticism is that it is mostly focussed on situational crime prevention
• To which they reply “yes”
• The point is – there are other explanations of crime

You might also like