0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views29 pages

Earthquake Load Calculation BNBC2020

The document outlines the principles and guidelines for earthquake-resistant design as per the Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC). It discusses the sources of earthquakes in Bangladesh, seismic zoning, response spectrum, and design response spectrum, emphasizing the importance of minimizing risks to life and ensuring structural performance during seismic events. Key parameters such as seismic zone coefficients, natural periods of buildings, and the effects of soil conditions on seismic response are also detailed.

Uploaded by

Al Emran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views29 pages

Earthquake Load Calculation BNBC2020

The document outlines the principles and guidelines for earthquake-resistant design as per the Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC). It discusses the sources of earthquakes in Bangladesh, seismic zoning, response spectrum, and design response spectrum, emphasizing the importance of minimizing risks to life and ensuring structural performance during seismic events. Key parameters such as seismic zone coefficients, natural periods of buildings, and the effects of soil conditions on seismic response are also detailed.

Uploaded by

Al Emran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 29

Earthquake Load

Calculation as per BNBC

Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor
1
Dept. Civil and Environmental Engg., SUST

EARTHQUAKE LOAD
LECTURE - 1

Mohaiminul Haque 3

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
Earthquake Resistant Design – Basic Concepts

▰ General principles:
▰ To provide guidelines to minimize the risk to life for all structures,
▰ To increase expected performance of higher occupancy structures compared to
ordinary structures ( by increasing importance factor)
▰ To improve the capability of essential structures to function after an earthquake (by
increasing importance factor)
▰ Building design without any damage for a major earthquake event not economically
feasible
▰ To allow inelastic deformation & structural damage at preferred locations in structure
▰ To prevent structural collapse during a major earthquake
Mohaiminul Haque 9

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Earthquake Resistant Design – Basic Concepts

Mohaiminul Haque 10

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
Earthquake Resistant Design – Basic Concepts

Mohaiminul Haque 11

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

SOURCES OF EARTHQUAKE IN BANGLADESH

▰ Regional seismicity
▰ Bangladesh can be affected by moderate to strong earthquake for
▻ Its proximity to collision boundary of
▻ Northeast moving Indian plate,
▻ Eurasian Plate and
▻ Burmese plate
▰ Strong historical earthquakes with Magnitude greater than 7.0 have Affected
parts of Bangladesh in last 150 years, Some of them had their epicenters
within the country
Mohaiminul Haque 12

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
Earthquake Resistant Design – Basic Concepts

Mohaiminul Haque 13

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Earthquake Resistant Design – Basic Concepts

Figure: Tectonic Map


of Bangladesh

Mohaiminul Haque 15

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION

▰ The ground motion at the site due to an earthquake is a complex


phenomena and depends on several parameters such as
▻ earthquake magnitude
▻ focal depth
▻ earthquake source characteristics
▻ distance from earthquake epicenter, wave path characteristics,
as well as local soil conditions at the site.

Mohaiminul Haque 16

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

SEISMIC ZONING

▰ The intent of the seismic zoning map is to give an indication of the Maximum
Considered Earthquake (MCE) motion at different parts of the country.
▰ In probabilistic terms, the MCE motion may be considered to correspond to
having a 2% probability of exceedance within a period of 50 years.
▰ The seismic zoning map divides the country into four seismic zones with
different expected levels of intensity of ground motion.
▰ Each zone has a seismic zone coefficient (Z) which represents the maximum
considered peak ground acceleration (PGA) on very stiff soil/rock (site class
SA) in units of g (acceleration due to gravity).

Mohaiminul Haque 18

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
SEISMIC
ZONING MAP

Figure 6.2.24
Seismic zoning map of
Bangladesh

Mohaiminul Haque 19

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

SEISMIC ZONING

▰ The zone coefficients (Z) of the four zones are:


▻ Z=0.12 (Zone 1)
▻ Z=0.20 (Zone 2)
▻ Z=0.28 (Zone 3)
▻ Z=0.36 (Zone 4)
▰ The most severe earthquake prone zone,
▻ Zone 4 is in the northeast which includes Sylhet and has a maximum PGA
value of 0.36g

Mohaiminul Haque 20

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
EARTHQUAKE LOAD
LECTURE - 2

Mohaiminul Haque 21

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

RESPONSE SPECTRUM

▰ Response means motion of structure in response to a base excitation


(earthquake motion)
▰ For earthquake resistant design, the entire time history of response may not be
required. Maximum value of response of a structure to particular base motion is
important.
▰ The response spectrum describes the maximum response (maximum
displacement, velocity, acceleration, or any other quantity of interest) of a SDOF
system to a particular input motion as function of natural frequency (or period)
of the system and damping ratio

Mohaiminul Haque 23

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM

Figure: Effect of damping: Amplitude of Figure: System whereby structure is


oscillation reduces with increase in considered as SDOF
damping

Mohaiminul Haque 24

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

RESPONSE SPECTRUM

▰ Natural Period Tn of a building is the time taken by it to undergo one complete


cycle of oscillation. It is an inherent property of a building controlled by its
mass, m and stiffness, k.
▰ Usually, natural periods (Tn) of 1 to 20 storey normal reinforced concrete and
steel buildings are in the range of 0.05 - 2.00s.
▰ Frequencies of ground-motion for engineering purposes
▻ Up to 0.1 to 10 Hz (T=0.1 to 10 sec)
▻ Resonant period of typical N story structure ~ N/10 sec

Mohaiminul Haque 25

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
RESPONSE SPECTRUM

Mohaiminul Haque 26

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

SPECTRAL ACCELERATION/VELOCITY/DISPLACEMENT

▰ The maximum value of response acceleration is called spectral acceleration


(Sa)
▰ Thus, Sv, Sd
▰ Zero natural period = infinite natural frequency = rigid body → Sa= PGA

Mohaiminul Haque 28

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
EARTHQUAKE LOAD
LECTURE - 3

Mohaiminul Haque 29

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM

▰ The earthquake ground motion for which the building has to be designed is represented by the
design response spectrum.
▰ Both static and dynamic analysis methods are based on this response spectrum.
▰ This spectrum represents the spectral acceleration for which the building has to be designed as a
function of the building period, taking into account the ground motion intensity.
▰ The spectrum is based on elastic analysis but in order to account for energy dissipation due to
inelastic deformation and benefits of structural redundancy, the spectral accelerations are reduced
by the response modification factor R.
▰ For important structures, the spectral accelerations are increased by the importance factor I.

Mohaiminul Haque 30

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM

▰ The design basis earthquake (DBE) ground motion is selected at a ground


shaking level that is 2/3 of the maximum considered earthquake (MCE) ground
motion.
▰ The effect of local soil conditions on the response spectrum is incorporated in
the normalized acceleration response spectrum Cs.
▰ The spectral acceleration for the design earthquake is given by the following
equation:
𝟐 𝒁𝑰
𝑺𝒂 = 𝑪 … … (𝟔. 𝟐. 𝟑𝟒)
𝟑𝑹 𝒔
Mohaiminul Haque 31

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM

𝟐 𝒁𝑰
𝑺𝒂 = 𝑪
𝟑𝑹 𝒔

Mohaiminul Haque 32

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM

𝟐 𝒁𝑰
𝑺𝒂 = 𝑪
𝟑𝑹 𝒔
▰ Sa = Design spectral acceleration (in units of g), which shall not be less than 2/3*ZI*β*S.
▰ β = coefficient used to calculate lower bound for Sa.
Recommended value for β is 0.11.
▰ Z = Seismic zone coefficient, as defined in Section 2.5.4.2
▰ I = Structure importance factor, as defined in Section 2.5.5.1
▰ R = Response reduction factor which depends on the type of structural system given in
Table 6.2.19. The ratio I/R cannot be greater than one.
▰ Cs = Normalized acceleration response spectrum, which is a function of structure (building)
period and soil type (site class) as defined by Equations 6.2.35 (a‐d)
Mohaiminul Haque 33

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM

Figure 6.2.25 Typical shape of the


elastic response spectrum
coefficient Cs

Mohaiminul Haque 34

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
NORMALIZED ACCELERATION RESPONSE
SPECTRUM, Cs

Figure 6.2.26 Normalized design


acceleration response spectrum for
different site classes.

Mohaiminul Haque 35

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

NORMALIZED ACCELERATION RESPONSE


SPECTRUM, Cs

▰ Cs depends on S and values of TB, TC and


Normalized acceleration response spectrum, Cs TD, (Figure 6.2.25) which are all functions
of the site class.
𝑻
𝑪𝒔 = 𝑺 𝟏 + 𝟐. 𝟓𝜼 − 𝟏 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝟎 ≤ 𝑻 ≤ 𝑻𝑩 … (𝟔. 𝟐. 𝟑𝟓𝒂) ▰ Constant Cs value between periods TB
𝑻𝑩 and TC represents constant spectral
acceleration
𝑪𝒔 = 𝟐. 𝟓𝑺𝜼 − 𝟏 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑻𝑩 ≤ 𝑻 ≤ 𝑻𝒄 … … (𝟔. 𝟐. 𝟑𝟓𝒃) ▰ S = Soil factor which depends on site
class and is given in Table 6.2.16
𝑻𝒄 ▰ T = Structure (building) period as defined
𝑪𝒔 = 𝟐. 𝟓𝑺𝜼 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑻𝒄 ≤ 𝑻 ≤ 𝑻𝑫 … … (𝟔. 𝟐. 𝟑𝟓𝒄)
𝑻 in Section 2.5.7.2
𝑻𝒄 𝑻𝑫
𝑪𝒔 = 𝟐. 𝟓𝑺𝜼 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑻𝑫 ≤ 𝑻 ≤ 𝟒 … … (𝟔. 𝟐. 𝟑𝟓𝒅)
𝑻𝟐

Mohaiminul Haque 37

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
NORMALIZED ACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM, Cs

▰ TB = Lower limit of the period of the constant spectral acceleration


branch given in Table 6.2.16 as a function of site class.
▰ TC = Upper limit of the period of the constant spectral acceleration
branch given in Table 6.2.16 as a function of site class
▰ TD = Lower limit of the period of the constant spectral displacement
branch given in Table 6.2.16 as a function of site class
▰ η = Damping correction factor as a function of damping with a
reference value of η=1 for 5% viscous damping. It is given by the
following expression:
𝜂= 10/(5 + ξ) ≥ 0.55 … … (6.2.36)

▰ where, ξ is the viscous damping ratio of the structure, expressed


as a percentage of critical damping. The value of η cannot be
Mohaiminul Haque 38
smaller than 0.55.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM


Table 6.2.16: Site Dependent Soil Factor and Other
Parameters Defining Elastic Response Spectrum

Soil type S TB (s) TC (s) TD (s)


SA 1.00 0.15 0.40 2.0
SB 1.20 0.15 0.50 2.0
SC 1.15 0.20 0.60 2.0
SD 1.35 0.20 0.80 2.0
SE 1.40 0.15 0.50 2.0

6.2.16: Site Dependent Soil Factor and Other Parameters Defining Elastic Response Spectrum 40

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
Table 6.2.13: Site Classification Based on Soil Properties

Mohaiminul Haque 41

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Table 6.2.13: Site Classification Based on Soil Properties

Mohaiminul Haque 42

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
2.5.3.2 Site Classification

▰ Site will be classified as type SA, SB, SC, SD, SE, S1 and S2 based on the provisions of
this Section. Classification will be done in accordance with Table 6.2.13 based on the
soil properties of upper 30 meters of the site profile.
▰ Average soil properties will be determined as given in the following equations

▰ where, ξ is the viscous damping ratio of the structure, expressed as a percentage of critical damping.
The value of η cannot be smaller than 0.55.
Mohaiminul Haque 43

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

2.5.3.2 Site Classification

Mohaiminul Haque 44

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
BUILDING CATEGORY

▰ IMPORTANCE FACTOR Table 6.2.17: Importance Factors for


▰ Buildings are classified in four occupancy (Table 6.1.1), Buildings and Structures for Earthquake
depending on the consequences of design
▻ collapse for human life,
Occupancy Importance
▻ on their importance for public safety and civil protection in
the immediate post earthquake period, and Category factor I
▻ on the social and economic consequences of collapse. I or II 1.0
▰ Depending on occupancy category, buildings may be designed III 1.25
for higher seismic forces using importance factor greater than
one IV 1.50

Mohaiminul Haque 45

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

BUILDING CATEGORIES

Table 6.1.1: Occupancy Category of Buildings and other Structures for Flood, Surge, Wind and Earthquake
Loads
Nature of Occupancy Category
Agricultural facilities, temporary facilities, Minor storage facilities I
All buildings and other structures except those listed in Occupancy Categories I, III and IV II
Buildings with more than 300 people, School, College, University, Jail III
Essential facilities: IV
power plant, Hospitals, Fire station, police stations, designated earthquake, hurricane, or other
emergency shelters, Aviation control towers, air traffic control centers.

Mohaiminul Haque 47

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
BUILDING CATEGORIES

SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY


▰ Buildings shall be assigned a seismic design category among B, C or D based on seismic zone, local site
conditions and importance class of building, as given in Table 6.2.18.
▰ Seismic design category D has the most stringent seismic design detailing, while seismic design category
B has the least seismic design detailing requirements.

Table 6.2.18: Seismic


Design Category of
Building

Mohaiminul Haque 48

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

TYPE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Table 6.2.19: Response Reduction Factor, Deflection Amplification Factor and Height Limitations for Different
Structural Systems

Mohaiminul Haque 49

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
TYPE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Mohaiminul Haque 50

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

TYPE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Mohaiminul Haque 51

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
TYPE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Mohaiminul Haque 52

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

TYPE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Mohaiminul Haque 53

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
TYPE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Mohaiminul Haque 54

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

EARTHQUAKE LOAD
LECTURE - 4

Mohaiminul Haque 55

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
STATIC ANALYSIS PROCEDURE

▰ Although analysis of buildings subjected to dynamic earthquake loads should


theoretically require dynamic analysis procedures, for certain type of building
structures subjected to earthquake shaking, simplified static analysis
procedures may also provide reasonably good results.
▰ The equivalent static force method is such a procedure for determining the
seismic lateral forces acting on the structure.

Mohaiminul Haque 56

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

EQUIVALENT STATIC ANALYSIS

▰ To perform equivalent static analysis the following two conditions need to be


fulfilled
a. The building period in the two main horizontal directions is smaller than
both 4TC (TC is defined in Section 2.5.6.3) and 2 sec.
b. The building doesn’t possess irregularity in elevation as defined in Section
2.5.7.3.

Mohaiminul Haque 57

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
DESIGN BASE SHEAR

Base shear
▰ Total design lateral force or shear due to earthquake at the base of a structure.

Design base shear


▰ The seismic design base shear force in a given direction shall be determined
from the following relation:
𝑉 = 𝑆 𝑊 … … (6.2.37)
▰ where, V
▻ 𝑆𝑎 = Lateral seismic force coefficient calculated using Eq. 6.2.34 (Sec
2.5.4.3). It is the design spectral acceleration (in units of g)
corresponding to the building period T (computed as per Sec 2.5.7.2).
Mohaiminul Haque 58
▻ W = Total seismic weight of the building defined in Sec 2.5.7.3
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

BUILDING PERIOD

▰ The building period T (in secs) may be approximated by the following formula:
𝑻 = 𝑪𝒕 (𝒉𝒏 )𝒎 … … (𝟔. 𝟐. 𝟑𝟖)
Where,
ℎ𝑛 = Height of building in (m) from foundation or from top of rigid basement. 𝐶𝑡 and m are
obtained from Table 6.2.20

Table 6.2.20: Values for Coefficients to Estimate Approximate Period

Mohaiminul Haque 59

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
SEISMIC WEIGHT

▰ Seismic weight, W, is the total dead load of a building or a structure, including partition walls,
and applicable portions of other imposed loads listed below:
a) For live load up to and including 3 kN/m2, a minimum of 25 percent of the live load shall be
applicable.
b) For live load above 3 kN/m2, a minimum of 50 percent of the live load shall be applicable.
c) Total weight (100 percent) of permanent heavy equipment or retained liquid or any imposed
load sustained in nature shall be included.

Mohaiminul Haque 60

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF LATERAL FORCES

▰ The total seismic lateral force at the base level, in other words the base shear V, shall be considered
as the sum of lateral forces 𝐹𝑥 induced at different floor levels, these forces may be calculated as:

𝑤 ℎ
𝐹 =𝑉 … … (6.2.41)
∑ 𝑤ℎ
Where,
𝐹𝑥 = Part of base shear force induced at level x
𝑤𝑖 and 𝑤𝑥 = Part of the total effective seismic weight of the structure (w) assigned to level i or x
ℎ𝑖 and ℎ𝑥 = the height from the base to level i or x
𝑘 = 1 For structure period ≤ 0.5s
= 2 for structure period ≥ 2.5s
= linear interpolation between 1 and 2 for other periods.
Mohaiminul Haque 61
n = number of stories Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
STOREY SHEAR AND ITS HORIZONTAL
DISTRIBUTION

▰ The design storey shear 𝑉𝑥, at any storey 𝑥 is the sum of the forces 𝐹𝑥 in that storey and all other
stories above

𝑉 = 𝐹 … … … (6.2.42)

▰ Where, 𝐹𝑖= Portion of base shear induced at level i, as determined by Eq. 6.2.41.

Mohaiminul Haque 62

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

EARTHQUAKE LOAD
LECTURE - 5

Mohaiminul Haque 64

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
EXAMPLE

▰ The plan of a 6-storied residential building situated in Sylhet city shown in Figure. Calculate base
shear force according to BNBC-2020. Also show the vertical distribution of lateral load in x-
direction. Consider following data:
Column size: 12"x 12" Floor height: 10’
Beam size: 10" x 18“ Wall Thickness: 5"
Slab Thickness: 5“
Seismic force resisting system:
Special reinforced concrete moment frame.

Mohaiminul Haque 65

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

EXAMPLE
Soil type S TB (s) TC (s) TD (s)
SA 1.00 0.15 0.40 2.0
We know, 𝑉 = 𝑆 𝑊 = 𝐶 .𝑊 SB 1.20 0.15 0.50 2.0
Here, Z = 0.36 (for zone 4) SC 1.15 0.20 0.60 2.0
I = 1 (for residential building) SD 1.35 0.20 0.80 2.0
For concrete moment resisting frame system, R = 8 SE 1.40 0.15 0.50 2.0

𝑻 Building period, 𝑇 = 𝐶 (ℎ )
𝑪𝒔 = 𝑺 𝟏 + 𝟐. 𝟓𝜼 − 𝟏 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝟎 ≤ 𝑻 ≤ 𝑻𝑩
𝑻𝑩
For concrete moment resisting frame,
= 𝟐. 𝟓𝑺𝜼 − 𝟏 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑻𝑩 ≤ 𝑻 ≤ 𝑻𝒄
𝐶 = 0.0466, 𝑚 = 0.9
𝑻𝒄 10
= 𝟐. 𝟓𝑺𝜼 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑻𝒄 ≤ 𝑻 ≤ 𝑻𝑫 ℎ = ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑛 𝑚 = 6 × 𝑚 = 18.29𝑚
𝑻 3.28
𝑻𝒄 𝑻𝑫 .
= 𝟐. 𝟓𝑺𝜼 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑻𝑫 ≤ 𝑻 ≤ 𝟒 ∴ 𝑇 = 0.0466 × 18.29 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟑𝟕 𝒔𝒆𝒄
𝑻𝟐
Let's Assume, site class is Sc
𝑇 0.60
∴, 𝐶 = 2.5𝑆𝜂 = 2.5 × 1.15 × 1 = 𝟐. 𝟕𝟎𝟕 ∴ 𝑆 = 1.15, 𝑇 = 0.20, 𝑇 = 0.60, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑇 = 2.0
𝑇 0.637
2 0.36 × 1 ∴, 𝑇 (= 0.20) < 𝑇(= 0.637) < 𝑇 (= 2.0)
∴, 𝑆 = × × 2.707 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟖𝟏𝟐
3 8
2 2
𝑆 ) = × 𝑍𝐼𝛽𝑆 = 0.36 × 1 × 0.11 × 1.15 = 0.0306
(
3 3 Mohaiminul Haque 67

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
EXAMPLE

Weight of slab= 53 × 26 × 0.15 = 86.13 𝑘𝑖𝑝

×
Weight of beam = 53 × 3 + 26 × 4 × 0.15 = 35.61𝑘𝑖𝑝
×
Weight of column = × 10 × 0.15 × 12 = 18𝑘𝑖𝑝

Weight of wall = 53 × 3 + 26 × 4 × 10 − × × 0.12 = 111.78 𝑘𝑖𝑝 Column size: 12"x 12" Floor height: 10’

Floor finish = 53 × 26 × 0.02 = 27.56 𝑘𝑖𝑝 Beam size: 10" x 18“ Wall Thickness: 5"

Total Dead Load = 279.07 𝑘𝑖𝑝 Slab Thickness: 5“

Live Load = 53 × 26 × 0.04 = 55.12 𝑘𝑖𝑝 Seismic force resisting system:


Special reinforced concrete moment frame.
Seismic Weight of one floor = 279.07 + 0.25 × 55.12 = 292.85 𝑘𝑖𝑝
Total Seismic Weight of the structure, W = 292.85 × 6 = 1757.128 𝑘𝑖𝑝
We know, 𝑉 = 𝑆 𝑊 = 0.0812 × 1757.128 = 142.7 𝑘𝑖𝑝

Mohaiminul Haque 68

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

EXAMPLE

Vertical Distribution of base shear

We know, 𝐹 = 𝑉 ∑

𝐹𝑜𝑟, 𝑇 = 0.5; 𝑘 = 1; 𝑇 = 2.5; 𝑘 = 2


2−1
∴ 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑇 = 0.637; 𝑘 = × .637 − 0.5 + 1 = 1.0685
2.5 − 0.5

𝑤 ℎ = 292.85 10 . + 20 . + 30 . + 40 . + 50 . + 60 . = 79276

Mohaiminul Haque 69

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
EXAMPLE

𝑤 ℎ
𝐹 =𝑉 𝑘 = 1.0685 𝑉 = 142.7
∑ 𝑤ℎ

Base shear distribution 42 k


Storey Height, Height above base,
Wx (kip) Wxhik Fh(kip)
hx(ft) hi(ft) 34 k
10.00 10.00 293 3432 6
27 k
10.00 20.00 293 7198 13
20 k
10.00 30.00 293 11102 20
13 k
10.00 40.00 293 15097 27

10.00 50.00 293 19163 34 6k

10.00 60.00 293 23285 42

∑ 79276 143

Mohaiminul Haque 70

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

EXAMPLE

Frame wise Distribution (in X-dir)


Load on Frame (kip)
Storey Fh(kip)
1 2 3
1 6 1.43 3.09 1.66

2 13 2.99 6.48 3.49


3 20 4.61 9.99 5.38

4 27 6.27 13.59 7.32


5 34 7.96 17.25 9.29
6 42 9.67 20.96 11.28

Mohaiminul Haque 71

Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

Course Teacher
Mohaiminul Haque
Assistant Professor, Dept. of CEE, SUST

You might also like