AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF
FOREIGN AIDS ON THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA: 2019 TO 2025
16 responses
Publish analytics
SECTION A: Demographic Information Copy
16 responses
(a) Male
(b) Female
43.8%
56.3%
2. Age category Copy
16 responses
(a) 18–25
(b) 26–35
(c) 36–45
18.8%
(d) 46 and
above
50%
25%
4. Occupation Copy
16 responses
(a) Student
(b) Employed
37.5% (c) Self-
employed
(d)
Unemployed
50%
5. Level of Education Copy
16 responses
(a) No formal
education
(b) Primary
(c) Secondary
(d) Tertiary
100%
5. Years of Experience in Development-related Field Copy
15 responses
(a) Less than 2
years
20%
(b) 2–5 years
(c) 6–10 years
13.3% (d) Above 10
26.7% years
40%
SECTION B:
Copy
6. Nigeria received various forms of foreign aid (financial, technical,
material) between 2019 and 2025.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
37.5% Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
12.5%
50%
7. The distribution of foreign aid was focused on strategic sectors such Copy
as health, education, and infrastructure.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
31.3%
Agree
Strongly Agree
50%
18.8%
8. The health sector received the largest share of foreign aid during the Copy
period under review.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
25% Agree
37.5% Strongly Agree
31.3%
Copy
9. Aid received was well-documented and accounted for by Nigerian
agencies.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
37.5%
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
18.8%
37.5%
10. Foreign aid distribution in Nigeria was influenced by donor priorities Copy
more than national needs.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
Agree
18.8%
50% Strongly Agree
18.8%
12.5%
SECTION C:
11. Foreign aid contributed positively to improvements in Nigeria’s health Copy
indicators.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
Agree
18.8%
Strongly Agree
68.8%
12.5%
12. Foreign aid enhanced educational access and quality during the Copy
2019–2025 period.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
81.3%
12.5%
Copy
13. Infrastructure projects funded by foreign aid improved economic
productivity.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
Agree
12.5% Strongly Agree
81.3%
14. Foreign aid significantly reduced poverty and unemployment in Copy
Nigeria.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
43.8% Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
12.5%
37.5%
15. Foreign aid interventions aligned with Nigeria’s development Copy
priorities.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
62.5% Agree
Strongly agree
12.5%
18.8%
SECTION D:
16. Corruption and mismanagement affected the effectiveness of foreign Copy
aid in Nigeria.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
56.3% Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
12.5%
25%
20. Bureaucratic bottlenecks delayed the implementation of foreign aid Copy
projects.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
25% Agree
Strongly Agree
62.5%
21. Monitoring and evaluation of foreign aid programs in Nigeria was Copy
weak or inconsistent.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
43.8% Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
31.3%
18.8%
22. There was limited transparency in the disbursement and utilization of Copy
aid funds.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
43.8% Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
25% 12.5%
18.8%
23. Inadequate coordination between donors and government agencies Copy
hindered aid effectivenes.
16 responses
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
25% Agree
Strongly Agree
50%
25%
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Contact form owner - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Does this form look suspicious? Report
Forms