Table of Content

Serial Title Page

No. No.
1. Introduction
2. Common Microbial Hazards in Food
3. Principles of Microbiological Risk Assessment
3.1 Hazard Identification
3.2 Hazard Characterization
3.3 Exposure Assessment

3.4 Risk Characterization

4. Additional Codex Principles of MRA
4.1 Scientific Soundness
4.2 Transparency and Documentation

4.3 Uncertainty and Variability Analysis

4.4 Separation of Risk Assessment and Risk
Management
5. Applications of Microbiological Risk Assessment in
the Food Chain
6. Future Directions in Microbiological Risk
Assessment (MRA)

7. Conclusion
References
 Microbiological Risk Assessment in the Food
Chain: Principles, Applications, and Future
Directions

1. Introduction:
Microbiological contamination in the food chain remains one of the most
significant public health challenges worldwide, particularly in low- and
middle-income countries like Bangladesh. The food supply chain is
vulnerable to a wide range of microbial hazards—including bacteria,
viruses, and parasites—which can lead to foodborne illnesses, economic
losses, and long-term public health consequences. According to the World
Health Organization (WHO, 2015), over 600 million people globally suffer
from foodborne diseases annually, with approximately 420,000 deaths,
many of which are attributed to microbial pathogens such as Salmonella
spp., Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter jejuni.
In the context of Bangladesh, the problem is further exacerbated by
inadequate infrastructure, poor food handling practices, lack of
awareness, and limited regulatory enforcement. Food sold in informal
markets, street food vendors, and small-scale food processors often lacks
basic hygiene and safety standards. A study by the International Centre
for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b) revealed that over
90% of raw food items in Dhaka’s local markets were contaminated with
microbial agents, including E. coli, due to improper handling and
unsanitary environmental conditions (Haque et al., 2016). These findings
underscore the urgency of adopting scientific tools like Microbiological
Risk Assessment (MRA) to identify, evaluate, and control microbial
hazards in the national food chain.
Microbiological Risk Assessment is a science-based, systematic process
used to estimate the risk of illness due to the presence of pathogenic
microorganisms in food. It consists of four core components: hazard
identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and risk
characterization (Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2007). This structured
approach enables policymakers, food industry professionals, and
regulators to assess not only the presence of harmful microbes in the food
chain but also the likelihood and severity of their effects on public health.
In Bangladesh, however, the adoption of MRA remains limited due to
constraints such as lack of trained personnel, inadequate laboratory
facilities, fragmented food safety governance, and limited access to real-
time surveillance data (FAO, 2020).
Globally, MRA has evolved to incorporate cutting-edge tools like
quantitative risk models, predictive microbiology, and whole genome
sequencing, making it possible to respond rapidly to emerging threats and
assess risks under various hypothetical scenarios. These methodologies
can be adapted to the Bangladeshi context through capacity building and
strategic investment in public health and food safety infrastructures.
Moreover, international collaborations and support from organizations like
the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health
Organization (WHO) can play a pivotal role in institutionalizing risk-based
food safety frameworks in Bangladesh.
As food systems become more globalized and climate change continues to
alter pathogen dynamics, the relevance of MRA becomes increasingly
critical. Bangladesh, with its dense population, growing urban food
demand, and vulnerability to waterborne and foodborne pathogens, must
integrate MRA into national food safety policies to ensure the health and
well-being of its citizens. This assignment explores the principles, practical
applications, and future directions of microbiological risk assessment, with
a particular emphasis on how these concepts can be adapted and scaled
for Bangladesh’s unique socio-economic and environmental landscape.
In recent decades, the role of MRA has evolved beyond traditional food
safety management. It now incorporates predictive microbiology,
probabilistic modelling, and quantitative risk evaluation to assess
microbial risks under varying conditions and scenarios (Buchanan &
Whiting, 1998). Moreover, the globalization of food trade, climate change,
and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) have further
emphasized the need for dynamic and integrated risk assessment
strategies that can adapt to complex, real-world food systems (EFSA,
2020).

2. Common Microbial Hazards in Food

Microbial hazards are microorganisms that can cause disease when
present in food. These include bacteria, viruses, parasites, and fungi,
each with unique characteristics and associated health risks. Their
presence in the food chain poses a significant threat to public health,
particularly in countries with limited hygiene, sanitation, and regulatory
systems.
I. Bacterial Hazards
a. Salmonella spp.
 Source: Undercooked poultry, eggs, raw milk, meat, and
contaminated water.
 Health Effects: Causes salmonellosis—symptoms include
diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps.
  Relevance: Common in developing countries due to poor sanitation
and improper food handling.
 Heat Sensitivity: Killed by proper cooking.
 Concern in Bangladesh: Frequently detected in street food and
poultry farms.
b. Escherichia coli O157:H7
 Source: Contaminated beef (especially ground beef), raw milk,
vegetables washed with contaminated water.
 Health Effects: Causes bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and
hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in severe cases.
 Risk Factor: Highly pathogenic strain; very low infectious dose.
 Prevention: Thorough cooking and proper hygiene.
c. Listeria monocytogenes
 Source: Ready-to-eat meats, unpasteurized dairy, smoked fish.
 Health Effects: Causes listeriosis, dangerous for pregnant women
(can lead to miscarriage), elderly, and immunocompromised
individuals.
 Unique Trait: Can grow at refrigeration temperatures.
 Control Measures: Sanitation in processing plants, especially in
cold environments.
d. Campylobacter jejuni
 Source: Raw or undercooked poultry, unpasteurized milk, untreated
water.
 Health Effects: Causes campylobacteriosis, leading to diarrhea,
fever, and sometimes Guillain-Barré syndrome.
 Common in poultry and often under-reported due to self-limiting
nature.

II. Viral Hazards

a. Norovirus
 Source: Contaminated water, raw shellfish, unwashed produce,
infected food handlers.
 Health Effects: Severe gastroenteritis; vomiting and diarrhea.
 Infectious Dose: Very low (as few as 10 particles).
  Transmission: Person-to-person, or through contaminated food.
 Control: Handwashing, hygiene, exclusion of sick workers.
b. Hepatitis A Virus (HAV)
 Source: Contaminated water, raw or undercooked shellfish, food
prepared by infected individuals.
 Health Effects: Liver infection, jaundice, fatigue, nausea.
 Long Incubation: Symptoms appear weeks after infection.
 Prevention: Vaccination, hygiene, proper sanitation.

III. Parasitic Hazards

a. Giardia lamblia
 Source: Contaminated water, fresh produce washed with unsafe
water.
 Health Effects: Causes giardiasis—chronic diarrhea, cramps,
fatigue.
 Common in: Regions with poor water treatment.
 Control: Safe water, washing produce with clean water.
b. Toxoplasma gondii
 Source: Undercooked meat, contaminated water, cat feces.
 Health Effects: Toxoplasmosis—dangerous for pregnant women
and immunocompromised people.
 Relevance: Risk in consuming raw or undercooked pork and lamb.
c. Taenia solium (Pork Tapeworm)
 Source: Raw/undercooked pork infected with cysts.
 Health Effects: Neurocysticercosis—can cause seizures and
neurological issues.
 Control: Meat inspection, proper cooking.

IV. Fungal Hazards (Toxigenic Molds)

a. Aspergillus flavus (produces Aflatoxins)
 Source: Improperly stored grains, nuts (especially peanuts), spices.
  Health Effects: Aflatoxins are carcinogenic, especially to the
liver. Chronic exposure linked to liver cancer.
 Common in: Hot, humid climates like Bangladesh.
 Prevention: Proper drying and storage of food commodities.
In developing countries like Bangladesh, microbial contamination is often
linked to lack of infrastructure, poor sanitation, and weak food safety
enforcement. Addressing these challenges through education, hygiene,
risk assessment, and improved regulation is critical to reduce the
burden of foodborne illnesses.

3. Principles of Microbiological Risk Assessment

Microbiological Risk Assessment (MRA) is a systematic, science-based
process used to estimate the risk of illness from exposure to pathogenic
microorganisms in food. It serves as a foundation for food safety decision-
making and policy development. The Codex Alimentarius outlines four
core components that define MRA, along with key principles to ensure
scientific integrity, transparency, and usability.

Figure-1: Steps and questions in the Risk Assessment process.

3.1 Hazard Identification

This initial step involves detecting and identifying microorganisms that
may pose a health risk in a specific food product or process. Tools such as
MicroHibro, FDA-iRisk, and BCoDE (Burden of Communicable Diseases in
Europe) are used for systematic hazard identification based on existing
scientific data and surveillance reports (EFSA, 2015). For example,
Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli
O157:H7 are commonly identified hazards in meat and dairy products.
This step involves:
 Identifying biological agents (bacteria, viruses, parasites) that may
cause foodborne illness.
 Determining their presence in specific foods or along the food chain.
 Using data from epidemiological studies, laboratory surveillance,
and outbreak reports.

3.2 Hazard Characterization

Hazard characterization describes the nature and severity of the health
effects associated with exposure to a pathogen. This may involve dose-
response assessments, which analyze the relationship between the dose
of the microorganism ingested and the likelihood of an adverse effect. The
variability among populations (e.g., infants, the elderly, or
immunocompromised individuals) is also considered (FAO/WHO, 2009).
This step assesses:
 The nature and severity of adverse health effects linked to the
pathogen.
 Dose-response relationship: the likelihood of illness based on the
amount of pathogen ingested.
 The susceptibility of different population groups (e.g., children,
elderly, immunocompromised).

3.3 Exposure Assessment

This component estimates the likely intake of a microorganism through
food consumption. It evaluates the prevalence, concentration, and
survival of pathogens at different stages of the food chain—during
farming, processing, storage, distribution, and consumption (FAO/WHO,
2008). Data inputs often include consumption patterns, microbial testing
data, and processing conditions. The production-to-consumption approach
is typically used to trace the entire pathway of contamination and
exposure.
This evaluates:
 The likely intake of the pathogen via food consumption.
 Factors such as:
 Prevalence and concentration of pathogens in food.
 Food handling, processing, storage, and preparation practices.
 Consumption patterns and food frequency data.

3.4 Risk Characterization

In the final step, all collected data are synthesized to provide an estimate
of the likelihood and severity of health outcomes. Risk characterization
can be qualitative (low, moderate, high risk) or quantitative (numerical
probability). Tools such as risk matrices are often used to visualize and
communicate risks to stakeholders (CAC, 2007).
This final component integrates all previous steps to:
 Provide an estimate of risk (qualitative or quantitative).
 Describe uncertainties and assumptions.
 Present findings in a format suitable for risk managers and
policymakers.

Figure-3: Hazard Identification to Uncertainty Analysis

4. Additional Codex Principles of MRA
In addition to the four components, the Codex Alimentarius recommends
the following principles:
4.1. Scientific Soundness
 MRA must be based on the best available scientific data.
 All data sources, assumptions, and methodologies must be
transparent and replicable.

Figure-4: Scientific Technical Soundness

4.2. Transparency and Documentation

 Every step, including data sources and uncertainties, should be
clearly documented.
 Transparency improves credibility and facilitates stakeholder trust.

4.3. Uncertainty and Variability Analysis

 MRA should explicitly characterize uncertainties and variability in
input data and modeling.
4.4. Separation of Risk Assessment and Risk Management
 Risk assessment must remain independent of policy or management
decisions, to preserve objectivity.

Figure-6: Risk Assessment and Risk Management Decision Process

These principles ensure that MRA remains a credible, science-based tool

for protecting public health and managing food safety risks. Following this
structured approach allows food safety authorities to make informed, risk-
based decisions that are globally recognized and harmonized.

5. Applications of Microbiological Risk Assessment in the

Food Chain
Microbiological Risk Assessment (MRA) plays a critical role in identifying,
managing, and mitigating risks associated with foodborne pathogens
throughout the food chain. As microbial contamination can occur at any
stage—ranging from production and processing to distribution and
consumption—MRA serves as a scientific foundation for ensuring food
safety and protecting public health.
 Supporting Risk-Based Food Safety Management
One of the primary applications of MRA is in the development of risk-
based food safety systems, which prioritize interventions based on the
level of microbiological risk. Traditional food safety approaches often
apply uniform standards, but MRA allows regulatory bodies and food
industries to target specific hazards more precisely.
By identifying high-risk foods and pathways of contamination, MRA
enables the design and implementation of Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Points (HACCP) systems that are tailored to specific products or
operations. For example, MRA can inform food processors about critical
steps in meat processing where Salmonella contamination is most likely,
allowing targeted monitoring and control.
This targeted approach ensures efficient resource utilization and
minimizes food safety failures, reducing the incidence of foodborne
illnesses and outbreaks.
 Establishing Microbiological Criteria and Food Standards
MRA is fundamental to setting science-based microbiological criteria for
food safety. These criteria include acceptable levels or absence of specific
pathogens in food products and are used to evaluate food lots, enforce
compliance, and ensure public safety.
Regulatory bodies such as the Codex Alimentarius Commission, European
Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
rely on MRA to set standards for pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes in
ready-to-eat foods or Escherichia coli in leafy greens.
For instance, a quantitative MRA of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-
eat foods informed Codex guidelines by estimating the likelihood of illness
per serving and suggesting risk-based limits. These standards guide
industry practices and inspection regimes, aligning public health goals
with international trade requirements.
 Enhancing Foodborne Outbreak Investigation and
Surveillance
MRA contributes to foodborne disease surveillance and outbreak
investigation by helping identify contamination sources, assess potential
exposure levels, and evaluate risk reduction strategies. When an outbreak
occurs, risk assessors can use existing data or develop rapid assessments
to estimate the scope and severity of the event.
For example, during a Campylobacter outbreak linked to raw milk, an MRA
can estimate how many people may be affected based on consumption
rates, pathogen levels, and population susceptibility. This enables health
authorities to act swiftly with evidence-based recalls, public health
advisories, and regulatory actions.
Furthermore, MRA supports the development of national foodborne
disease databases, strengthening early detection systems and long-term
epidemiological studies.
 Informing Consumer Protection and Public Health Policy
One of the key objectives of MRA is to protect public health, particularly
for vulnerable groups such as infants, elderly individuals, pregnant
women, and immunocompromised populations. By providing quantitative
estimates of infection risks from various foods, MRA helps shape
consumer guidance and national dietary recommendations.
For instance, MRAs on seafood contamination with Vibrio
parahaemolyticus or methylmercury inform advisories for pregnant
women to avoid high-risk species. Similarly, risk assessments on
Toxoplasma gondii guide public campaigns on cooking and handling meat.
These measures help reduce individual risk through informed choices and
responsible food handling, bridging the gap between science and public
education.
 Facilitating International Food Trade and Policy
Harmonization
Global food trade is governed by the World Trade Organization’s Sanitary
and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement, which requires that food safety
measures be scientifically justified. MRA provides the necessary evidence
base for these measures, promoting transparency and harmonization
between trading partners.
Countries can use MRAs to defend national standards during trade
disputes or to establish equivalence agreements. For instance, a country
may require that imported shellfish meet microbiological limits based on
its national MRA. In response, the exporting country can conduct a
comparable assessment to demonstrate equivalence.
Thus, MRA strengthens international cooperation and facilitates safe trade
by building trust in the scientific integrity of food safety systems.
 Supporting Product Development and Innovation
In the private sector, MRA is increasingly applied to evaluate the safety of
novel food products, processing technologies, and packaging innovations.
Before a new product is introduced, manufacturers may conduct a risk
assessment to identify potential microbial hazards and validate control
strategies.
For example, an MRA might be conducted for a new high-protein beverage
made from raw eggs, assessing the likelihood of Salmonella growth under
various storage conditions. Based on this, the company can implement
thermal processing, preservatives, or other control measures.
This application ensures that innovation does not compromise consumer
safety and supports industry competitiveness in an increasingly complex
food landscape.
 Building Institutional Capacity and Food Safety Culture
Finally, MRA plays an essential role in capacity building and education.
Governments and international organizations use MRA as a training tool to
strengthen national food safety infrastructure, particularly in developing
countries. It also supports the establishment of national risk assessment
units, analytical laboratories, and surveillance networks.
Educational institutions incorporate MRA into food science, veterinary, and
public health curricula to cultivate the next generation of risk analysts and
food safety professionals. This widespread adoption contributes to a
stronger food safety culture, enabling science-driven decision-making
across the food chain.
Microbiological Risk Assessment is a cornerstone of modern food safety
systems, with wide-ranging applications that span regulation, public
health, trade, and innovation. Its utility lies in its ability to transform
complex microbiological data into actionable insights, ensuring that food
remains safe and nutritious at every step of the supply chain. As the
global food system continues to evolve, the role of MRA will become
increasingly central in tackling emerging food safety challenges and
achieving public health goals.

6. Future Directions in Microbiological Risk Assessment

(MRA)
As global food systems become increasingly complex due to changing
consumer demands, international trade, climate variability, and emerging
pathogens, Microbiological Risk Assessment (MRA) must continue to
evolve. Future directions in MRA are focused on enhancing its scientific
robustness, technological integration, and practical utility across food
safety governance and industry.
 Integration of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)
One of the most transformative developments in microbiology is the
application of whole genome sequencing (WGS) for pathogen
identification and characterization. In future MRAs, WGS will:
  Improve hazard identification by accurately distinguishing
between virulent and non-virulent strains.
 Enable better source tracking and attribution of foodborne
outbreaks.
 Enhance understanding of antimicrobial resistance patterns.
For example, using WGS, regulators can trace a Listeria monocytogenes
outbreak back to a specific processing plant, even when cases are
geographically dispersed.
 Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) Modelling
Future MRA will increasingly rely on quantitative models that simulate
real-world scenarios with high accuracy. These models will:
 Use probabilistic approaches to estimate exposure, dose-
response, and risk under varying conditions.
 Be supported by advanced computational tools and artificial
intelligence (AI) to handle complex data.
 Open-access tools like @Risk, MicroHibro, and FDA-iRisk are
examples of platforms that will be refined and widely used to
support scenario-based decision-making.
 Incorporating Climate Change and One Health
Considerations
Climate change is expected to significantly influence foodborne disease
dynamics through:
 Changes in temperature and humidity affecting microbial
growth.
 Increased risks of contamination from floods, droughts, and
altered agricultural practices.
Future MRAs will integrate climate data and One Health frameworks
(linking human, animal, and environmental health) to assess risk
comprehensively. This is especially relevant for zoonotic pathogens and
antimicrobial resistance (AMR) originating from agricultural sources.
 Real-Time and Predictive Risk Assessment
With the advancement of smart sensors, blockchain, and Internet of
Things (IoT) in the food industry, MRA will become more dynamic and real-
time. Future systems may include:
 Automated alerts for microbial contamination based on sensor
data.
 Real-time risk scoring during processing or distribution.
 Integration with supply chain traceability systems to identify
high-risk batches quickly.
These technologies will enable preventive risk management rather than
reactive measures.
 Expanded Use in Developing Countries
As food safety systems develop globally, MRAs will become critical tools in
low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Future efforts will include:
 Building national capacity for MRA through training,
infrastructure, and policy support.
 Tailoring MRA methodologies to data-scarce environments
using qualitative or semi-quantitative tools.
 Promoting regional risk assessment centers for collaborative
assessments.
This expansion will help harmonize food safety standards and reduce the
burden of foodborne illnesses worldwide.
 Consumer Behavior and Socioeconomic Integration
Future MRA frameworks will integrate behavioral sciences and
socioeconomic data to assess how consumer practices influence exposure
risk. These include:
 Improper storage or cooking techniques.
 Cultural food preferences (e.g., raw milk, street food).
 Socioeconomic access to safe food.
Understanding these factors allows for more realistic exposure
assessments and targeted public health interventions.
 Multi-Hazard and Cumulative Risk Assessment
Traditional MRA focuses on individual hazards; however, real-world
exposure often involves multiple pathogens, chemicals, or stressors.
Future MRA will move toward:
 Cumulative risk assessment frameworks.
 Incorporating synergistic or antagonistic effects of combined
exposures (e.g., bacteria + toxins).
 Holistic approaches to evaluate total food safety risk.
This approach aligns with modern public health risk management
principles and ensures a more comprehensive safety assessment.

The future of Microbiological Risk Assessment is poised for transformative

change driven by genomics, predictive analytics, digital tools, and global
collaboration. Its evolution will enable faster, more accurate, and inclusive
assessments that can anticipate risks before they escalate into outbreaks.
By embracing innovation while ensuring scientific integrity, MRA will
remain an essential pillar of global food safety in the 21st century.

7. Conclusion
Microbiological Risk Assessment (MRA) plays a pivotal role in ensuring
food safety by providing a structured, science-based framework for
identifying and managing microbiological hazards in the food chain. As
food systems become more globalized and complex, the importance of
MRA in safeguarding public health continues to grow. The core principles
of MRA—hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure
assessment, and risk characterization—form the backbone of preventive
food safety systems. These steps enable risk managers and policymakers
to make informed decisions, prioritize resource allocation, and implement
appropriate control measures (FAO/WHO, 2006). In practical applications,
MRAs have been successfully employed to assess risks associated with
pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., Escherichia
coli O157:H7, and Campylobacter jejuni, influencing food safety standards
and policy at national and international levels. The incorporation of MRA
into Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems and
Codex Alimentarius guidelines demonstrates its value in regulatory and
industry settings (Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2007).Looking ahead,
the future of MRA lies in integrating quantitative risk models, genomic
surveillance, predictive microbiology, and big data analytics. These
advancements will improve the precision and speed of assessments,
particularly in real-time decision-making scenarios. Additionally, the One
Health approach, which considers the interconnectedness of human,
animal, and environmental health, underscores the need for
interdisciplinary collaboration in microbiological risk analysis (Havelaar et
al., 2010).MRA serves as a critical tool in ensuring food safety. It not only
identifies and evaluates microbial hazards but also guides policy-makers
and industry stakeholders in implementing effective risk management
strategies. Future directions should focus on:
 Increasing accessibility to open-source hazard identification tools.
 Enhancing data-sharing protocols.
 Improving communication of risks to consumers and regulators.
By strengthening each component of MRA, we can create a more resilient
global food safety system.
Despite its advancements, challenges remain, including data limitations,
variability in food production environments, and uncertainties in dose-
response relationships. To overcome these, investment in capacity
building, standardized methodologies, and international cooperation is
essential. Microbiological Risk Assessment stands as a cornerstone of
modern food safety. As the global food supply chain evolves, MRA will
continue to be indispensable in mitigating risks, protecting consumers,
and fostering trust in food systems. Strategic advancements and global
harmonization of practices will be critical to unlocking its full potential and
ensuring resilient food safety frameworks in the future.

References:
Buchanan, R. L., & Whiting, R. C. (1998). Risk assessment and
predictive microbiology: the journey from theory to reality.
Food Control, 9(2–3), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-
7135(98)00002-5
Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). (2007). Working principles for risk
analysis for food safety for application by governments. FAO/WHO.
Codex Alimentarius Commission. (1999). Principles and Guidelines for the
Conduct of Microbiological Risk Assessment. FAO/WHO.
Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2007). Principles and guidelines for the
conduct of microbiological risk assessment (CAC/GL-30). FAO/WHO.
Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/
Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2007). Principles and guidelines for the
conduct of microbiological risk assessment. CAC/GL-30.
http://www.fao.org/input/download/standards/351/CXG_030e.pdf
EFSA. (2015). The use of microbiological risk assessment outputs in
support of decision-making. EFSA Journal, 13(6), 4131.
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4131
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2020). Microbiological hazards in
the EU: Summary of scientific opinions, 2016–2020. EFSA Journal,
18(S1), e18041. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e18041
FAO. (2020). Bangladesh: Food safety and quality management systems –
Baseline and way forward. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations. Retrieved from
https://www.fao.org/publications
FAO/WHO. (2006). Food Safety Risk Analysis: A Guide for National Food
Safety Authorities. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 87.
FAO/WHO. (2006). Food safety risk analysis: A guide for national food
safety authorities. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 87.
http://www.fao.org/3/a0822e/a0822e00.htm
FAO/WHO. (2009). Principles and methods for the risk assessment of
chemicals in food. Environmental Health Criteria 240.
FAO/WHO. (2011). Risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood:
Interpretative summary and technical report. Microbiological Risk
Assessment Series No. 16.
Food and Drug Administration. (2023). FDA-iRisk Tool. Retrieved from
https://www.fda.gov
Haque, M. A., Bari, M. L., & Alam, M. J. (2016). Microbial contamination in
street-vended foods in Dhaka City: An emerging public health
concern. Journal of Food Protection, 79(4), 708–714.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-388
Havelaar, A. H., Brul, S., de Jong, A., de Jonge, R., Zwietering, M. H., & ter
Kuile, B. H. (2010). Future challenges to microbial food safety.
International Journal of Food Microbiology, 139, S79–S94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.10.015
NACMCF. (1989). Microbiological Criteria for Foods. United States
Department of Agriculture.
WHO. (2015). Estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases:
Foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007–
2015. World Health Organization. Retrieved from
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565165
WHO/FAO. (2008). Exposure Assessment of Microbiological Hazards in
Food: Guidelines.