3 - Owp126010 Wcdma Hspa&Hspa+ Dimensioning Issue 1.01 Wom Colombia
3 - Owp126010 Wcdma Hspa&Hspa+ Dimensioning Issue 1.01 Wom Colombia
HSPA+ Dimensioning
www.huawei.com
1. HSDPA Dimensioning
2. HSUPA Dimensioning
3. HSPA+ Dimensioning
1. HSDPA Dimensioning
Cable Loss
UE Antenna Gain
Penetration UE
Loss Sensitivity DOWNLINK BUDGET
UE reception sensitivity
Coverage Requirement
R99: Based on target continuous coverage service
Simulation KPI
R99: Connect Success Rate, Coverage Probability, Pilot
Pollution Proportion and SHO
HSDPA
power
Cell total power Cell total power
More power
R99 DCH Power 90% R99 DCH Power to ensure
75% R99 capacity
CCH CCH
time time
Other Parameters
R99
Power control margin should be considered.
HSDPA
Power control margin need not be considered.
Ec PHS − DSCH
= 10 × log( DL _ CoupleLoss+NF+Nt
)
No
(α + f )×η DL × Pmax + 10 10
DL_CoupleLoss=DL_PL+TxBodyLoss+TxCableLoss-TxAntennaGain
Downlink Path Loss
+RxBodyLoss + RxCableLoss-RxAntennaGain +PenetrationLoss
+SlowFadingMargin
Ec PHS − DSCH
Ec/No at Cell Edge = 10 × log( DL _ CoupleLoss+NF+Nt
)
No
(α + f )×η DL × Pmax + 10 10
Simulation Results
DL_CoupleLoss=DL_PL+TxBodyLoss+TxCableLoss-TxAntennaGain
+RxBodyLoss + RxCableLoss-RxAntennaGain +PenetrationLoss
HSDPA Cell Radius
+SlowFadingMargin
HSDPA Power
Body loss : 0 dB
6000
= 10 * log( 144.66 −108.16 + 7
) = −10.2dB
(0.5 + 1.78) * 0.9 * 20000 + 10 10
1. HSDPA Dimensioning
HS-DSCH will use the spare power apart from that of R99
Unused power
Pmax-R99 HS-DSCH
Distribution probability
3.50%
3.00%
2.50%
4.22
2.98
2.04
1.39
0.96
0.66
0.45
0.31
0.21
0.14
0.1
0.07
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0
0
0
0
Ioc/Ior
Cell coverage
radius
Simulation
HSDPA Power
Ior/Ioc distribution
Allocation
800 *1200
* (1 + 10%) = 293kbps
3600
The needed power for HS-DSCH including that for HS-SCCH is 18.38%
1. HSDPA Dimensioning
Definition of a CE:
A Channel Element is the base band resource required in the NodeB
to provide capacity for one voice channel, including control plane
signaling, compressed mode, transmit diversity and softer handover.
AMR12.2k 1 1
CS64k 3 2
PS64k 3 2
PS128k 5 4
PS144k 5 4
PS384k 10 8
1. HSDPA Dimensioning
2. HSUPA Dimensioning
3. HSPA+ Dimensioning
2. HSUPA Dimensioning
Interference Margin
NodeB Antenna Gain
Cable loss
Cable Loss UE Antenna Gain
Body Loss
NodeB UE power backoff
Sensitivity Penetration Penetration Loss
Loss
UE maximum transmission
power
Margin
Loss
NodeB receiver sensitivity
Cell Radius
Link
Budget
Ec/No = Cell
Edge NodeB Cell Edge NodeB
Receiver signal Receiver signal strength
Simulation
strength-(-
108.16+ NodeB
Noise Figure) Cell Edge
Cell Edge Ec/No =>Throughput
Ec/No Throughput
TU3_SBLER70%
10 TU3_SBLER30%
5 TU50_SBLER70%
TU50_SBLER30%
0 RA3_SBLER70%
RA3_SBLER30%
-5
Ec/N0
-10
-15
-20
Bearer Rate
-25
69 507.6 978 1353 1927.8 2706 4050
SBLER
Simulation Condition
SBLER=10%
-10
TU50 TU3 PA3
Without Power Control -11
-12
-13
Ec/N0 -14
-15
-16
R99
-17
HSUPA
-18
Channel Model
Simulation Condition
TA3
CAT5&CAT6
2. HSUPA Dimensioning
Target
The relationship between HSUPA Ec/No and HSUPA Cell
throughput is obtained from simulation
Simulation Condition
Voice per cell : 20Erl
Cell Throughput
TTI of HSUPA :10ms 700
Cell Throughput
Cell Throughput(Kbps) 600
Single carrier 500
118%
400
30%
300
200
100
0
R99_Load50% HSUPA_Load50% HSUPA_Load75%
HSDPA
HSUPA
\
HSUPA
R99 DCH
R99 DCH R99 R99
DCHDCH
700 19%
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
WithoutHSUPA HSUPA_5%_Power HSUPA_10%_Power
64 128 16 2 4
128 256 8 4 8
UL
608 608 4 8 16
1280 1280 2SF4 16 32
608 608 4 8 16
NA 64 32 1 2
32 128 16 2 4
128 256 8 4 8
UL 608 608 4 8 16
Corresponding
Rate (kbit/s) Rate (kbit/s) Number of CEs
Direction SF Credits
SF > minSF SF = minSF Consumed
Consumed
608 608 4 8 16
1280 1280 2SF4 16 32
Associated
Dedicated Channels
E-D
PD
E-D CH
PC
CH
Site 1 Site 2
A-DCH of HSUPA
One HSUPA link requires one downlink A-DCH
Associated
Dedicated Channels
AG
CH
&R
GC
H&
HIC
H
Site 1 Site 2
R99
Uplink and downlink CE dimensioning are the same
HSDPA
HS-DSCH and HS-SCCH consume no additional CE
No soft handover overhead
HSUPA
Uplink CE dimensioning is more complicated
Both E-DPDCH and E-DPCCH consume CE
Soft handover overhead
1. HSDPA Dimensioning
2. HSUPA Dimensioning
3. HSPA+ Dimensioning
DL DRX
UL 16QAM: Higher order modulation for UL, increase peak rate to 11Mbps
DC-MIMO : DC-HSDPA(with 64QAM) and MIMO are used at the same time,
with the technology, DL peak rate can reach 84Mbps
HSPA+ Dimensioning
Algorithms of Dimensioning are all same with HSPA
NodeB
Throughput (kbps)
15000
Ior/Ioc (dB)
Cell Throughput: 64QAM vs 16QAM, Macro, PA3 Cell Throughput: 64QAM vs 16QAM, Micro, PA3
11000 11000
16%
10000 10000
9000 9000
8000
7% 16QAM 8000
16QAM
64QAM
7000 7000 64QAM
6000 6000
5000 5000
4000 4000
30000
25000
Throughput (kbps)
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Ior/Ioc (dB)
MIMO vs 16QAM: MIMO has better performance under both
good and bad radio condition
10000
8000 9000
7000 8000
6000 7000
5000 16QAM
6000 16QAM
MIMO MIMO
4000 5000
40
30 UE NUMBER be provided in typical Urban
20
10
scenario
0 47.5% capacity gain can be
noncpc upload = 33.514005% cpc upload = 33.7399988%
achieved in typical Rural
UPLINK UPLOAD(%)
scenario
The basic principle which CPC can provide capacity gain is that activity of
DPCCH is decreased. Thus the interferences from each users is degraded
and more users can be supported with the same noise rise (Uplink load)
VoIP UEs bring smaller noise rise compare to Non CPC case, which
remains more resources to FTP service to achieve higher cell
1400
1200
1000
400
200
0
10VoIP+5FTP 10VoIP+5FTP 20VoIP+5FTP 30VoIP+5FTP 40VoIP+5FTP
50% loading 75% loading 75% loading 75% loading 75% loading
0.30
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VoIP USERS
1600
800
600
400
200
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
VoIP USERS
DC-HSDPA extend
coverage range
7.4%
7.2%
1.9%
7
29%
6
UL Cell Throuput (Mbps)
5
32%
38%
4 IC OFF
3 IC ON
2
1
0
2 3 4
User Number (HSUPA Cat6) in one cell
1*SF64 1 CE 1 CE 1 CE
1*SF32 1.5 CE 1 CE 1 CE
1*SF16 3 CE 2 CE 2 CE
1*SF8 5 CE 4 CE 4 CE
1*SF4 10 CE 8 CE 8 CE
2*SF4 20 CE 16 CE 16 CE
2*SF2 32 CE 32 CE 32 CE
2*SF2+2*SF4 48 CE 48 CE 48 CE
2*SF2+2*SF4
not supported not supported 64 CE
(HSP A+, 16QAM )
up as radius increase
due to MIMO TD
DC-
HSUPA SC-HSUPA
HSUPA密集城区H
coverage,
SU Pdensely populated urban area
A 新特性覆盖对比
12000
H SU P A + Q P SK 10m s
10000 H SU P A + Q P SK 2m s
H SU P A + 16Q A M
H SU PA Th ro u g h p u t (kb p s)
D C + H SU P A + 16Q A M
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80
R a d iu s (km )
* Link estimation
Simulation Result
Cell throughput decreases as DC users increase (typically -5.99% at 8
DC users)
System
Cell1 Load Cell2 Load Gain of DC
User Number Throughput
(%) (%) vs SC (%)
(kbps)
2 SC 65.02 65 8421.84 -
2 DC 75.03 74.78 8629.38 2.46
4 SC 73.63 73.56 6942.49 -
4 DC 73.64 73.63 6802.62 -2.01
8 SC 72.16 72.41 4537.97 -
8 DC 72.03 72.31 4266.1 -5.99
16 SC 73.62 73.42 3566.36 -
16 DC 73.96 74.06 3320.85 -6.88
HSDPA Dimensioning
HSUPA Dimensioning
HSPA+ Dimensioning