archive.today stem “ Tare2on sananure APPOOe CSEIU a anapahots from host eknatousneou home biog Ofte ame Wenase One Stunts Furnas Oto ‘Adamic Christianity rato oo‘Adam: the Patriarch of One ‘The Noahite Nations: the Race Japhethites ‘The Noahite Nations: the ‘The Noahite Nations: the Hamites Shemites The Dispersions of Israel: the Danaans and ‘The Dispersions of Israel: the Hebrew Dorian Phoenicians Concerning the Non-Adamic Biblical Descriptions of the Adamic White Ancient Races Israelites ‘Aram The House of the Pharoahs and the Ancient n Ancient Hebrews Hamites Concerning the Ancient ‘A Brood of Vipers: the Serpent's Aethiops Seed ‘The Satanic Origins of the Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews Deuteronomy 23.7 and the Re Against the Lying Pen of the Edomites, Scribes Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation and Multiculturalism Who Killed Refuting “Black Hebrew Against the Jesus? Israelites” Sudaizers The Jewish Perversion of the Biblical Circumcision Rite ‘The Ethiopian Eunuch and Simeon Niger: Negroe Saints? ‘The Jewish Ties of the Infamous Opponents of the Early Church 1g the Sin of the Antediluvian ‘The Genesis Flood: Global or Adamites. Local? “Desert Against the Lying Pen of the Scribes‘Parable of the Wheat and the Tares” “Abraham Bloemaert Itis an established historical fact that the Hasmonean ruler John Hyrcanus I conquered the Edomites in the late 2nd century BC, forcibly converted them to the religion of Judah and integrated the Edomites into the nation af Jucah (Josephus, Antiquities 13.257-258, 13.395-397, Strabo, Geography 16.2.34 et al). The ‘conquest and mass conversion of any people, let alone a cursed and mongrelized people like Edom, was an unprecedented event in Israel's history which hac catastrophic results. ‘The Jews of today are themselves descended from the Edomites and are thoroughly mixed with them, and therefore they find it necessary to justify and even praise the absorption of the Edomites into the nation of Judah. In the Masoretic Text of Amos 9 ‘we read “In that day will | raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereot and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old: That they may possess the remnant of Edom, and ofall the heathen, which ere called by my name" (wv. 11-12, King James Version), ‘The Edomite Jews of course interpret that this refers to the conversion of their ancestors during the reign of Hyrcanus I. There are many points of apparent conflict with other Scriptures in this interpretation (Ezekiel 35, Isaiah 34, Obadiah, Malachi 1.2-4, Romans 9 et al), but there is a simple resolution. Most modern Old Testament translations are based upon the Masoretic Text of the Jews, but the Greek Septuagint, version of the Old Testament provides a different reading which is certainly more consistent with Scripture,“LLIn that day I will raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and will rebuild the ruins oft, and will set up the parts thereo! that have been broken down, and will, build it up as in the ancient days: 12that the remnant of men, and all the Gentiles upon whom my name is called, may earnestly seek me, saith the Lord who does all these things.” -Amos 9 (Brenton’s Septuagint) Where the Masoretic Text has OFTx/Edom (Strong’s H123) the Septuagint has ‘oxvfipcoruny/men (Strong's G444). This reading gives a very different picture of the prophecy which is much more consistent with the rest of Scripture. It is apparent here that the Septuagint translators read OTW/Adam (H1.20) where the Masoretes read DFTX/Edom. Aside from the vowel markings of the Masoretes, the lvav is the only thing to distinguish the Hebrew words ON and O'R and the addition of a single simple line () to the text transforms the message. Ostensibly this corruption of the text must predate Jerome's Latin Vulgate translation (late 4th century AD) which has Idumeae/Edom in this verse. Itis evident from the reading of Amos 9.12 in the elder Septuagint, which preceded the Vulgate by over 5 centuries and which was favoured by the early Church, that this prophecy refers to the remnant of Adamic man called back to God through Israel under the New Covenant. Its certainly not a prophecy of the integration of Edom into the nation of Judah. The unchanging God never changed his mind about Edom ‘who has been condemned of God since ancient times, but God has always had a plan for the redemption of the authentic seed of Adam. That the Septuagint contains the cortect reading is proven fully by James’ speech at the Council of Jerusalem where he paraphrases the Septuagint reading (Acts 15.1617) Obadiah 1.48 states that “the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau stubble: and they shall be kindled in them, and shall devour them: and there shall be no remains of the house of Esau”, Would the God of Jacob be a God unto “the remnant of Edom” only to later have Israel ensure that, “there shall be no remains of the house of Esau"? Why would God annihilate his own authentic followers? ‘The Kenite, Canaanite and Edomite Jews dread the righteous judgement of our God Upon Edom and all the aliens, and this has influenced their textual traditions of the Old Testament in another place; Malachi 4.1, The Masoretic Text reads here “behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble” (King James Version). The Septuagint however, gives a different reading, “1For, Behold, a day comes burning as an oven, and it shall consume them; and all the aliens {adAoyevelc, Strong's G244], and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that is coming shall set them on fire, saith the Lord Almighty, and there shall not be left of them root or branch, 28ut to you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise, and healing shall be in his wings: and ye shall go forth, andbound as young calves let loose from bonds. 3And ye shall trample the wicked; for they shall be ashes underneath your feet in the day which I appoint, saith the Lord Almighty.” -Malachi 4 (Brenton's Septuagint) Here in Malachi 4.1 the LXX translators apparently read a resh where the Masoretes read (or corrupted to) a dalet instead. Thus the Masoretes have zedim (plural of }2086) where the LX translators read zarim (plural of H2114) and translated oidhoyeveig (6241) meaning “of another race” (Liddell and Scott sv) or “sprung from another race” (Thayer s.x). Compare zediny/O" and zarim/O"W. ‘The same scribal error (or corruption) has been noted elsewhere by other scholars, Inannote for Psalm 54.3 the Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges states that “This verse is repeated almost vertuatim in Psalm 86:14 (a mosaic constructed of fragments of other Psalms), with the change, accidental or intentional, of strangers into proud. The consonants of the Heb, words zarim, strangers, and zédim, proud, are almost identical, and some Heb. MSS. and the Targ. read 26 here; but the rest of the versions support the Massoretic Text”, Ellicot's Commentary for English Readers corroborates this under the entry for Psalm 54.3 stating “This verse, with some variations, occurs again (Psalm 86:14); some MSS. even reading here “proud,” instead of “strangers.” ‘There are several other examples of dalet/resh confusion evident in a comparison of the LXX and MT. For example at 1 Samuel 22.9 Doeg is called a Syrian in the LXX where the translators apparently read MN/Arammiy (H764) instead of NTA/Edomiy (H130), Another example is Genesis 10.4 where in the MT we have D'77/Dodanim (1721) while the LXX translators read D'TY/Rodanim (H72900) and translated as Rhodians. Other examples can be found. ‘That the Septuagint reading of Malachi 4.1 is most accurate is evident in the New ‘Testament in Jesus’ parable of the wheat and the tares when Christ uttered “things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world” (Matthew 13.35). In this parable recorded in Matthew 13 Jesus tells us that the weeds sown in the field of wheat were planted by an enemy (ww. 25, 26) who is the devil and whose children are the weeds (w. 38, 39). Does the devil go about planting evil spirit created by God? Nay, Satan has no such power over the spirits and bodies that God has created. The children sown by the devil are the same aliens refered to in Malachi 4.1 whose fate is the lake of fire. in vessels At 1 Thessalonians 2.15 the Majority Text, (and therefore the King James Version) doscribes the wicked Judeans as those “Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their ‘own [WStous, Strong's G2398] prophets”, This reading might be taken to mean that the murderers of Christ could call the prophets of God “their own’, which is certainly Not the case. Jesus said that “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 15.24) and that “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me” (John 10.27), yet He had also said to his Judean opponents that “yebelieve not, because ye are not of my sheep” (John 10.26). Why then would the text say that those who plotted against Jesus’ life were lost sheep of the house of Israel to whom were sent the prophets? All the oldest manuscripts (e.g. the codices Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Vaticanus, Claromentanus, Freerianus and 0208) have “the” (tos, G3588) rather than “their ‘own’. That “the prophets” is the correct reading has been noted by other scholars. Motzger’s Textual Commentary states that “The Textus Receptus reads Sous npogrzac, following a variety of secondary witnesses ... Whether these somehow derived the reading from Marcion, who inserted the word in order to limit the reference to Jewish prophets, or whether they were influenced by iSiav in the preceding verse, is immaterial to the present purpose, The shorter reading is decisively supported by the best representatives of several text types.” footnote for this verse in the New English Translation says ofthe longer reading that “This is obviously a secondary reading, Marcion’s influence my stand behind part of the tradition, but the Byzantine text probably added the adjective in light ofits mention in v. 14 and as a clarification or interpretation of which prophets were in view", Ibis not only the anti-Christ Jews who have failed to faithfully transmit the text but Christian scribes have also erred in this regard, We must lake great care to faithfully examine the Scriptures to obtain the most accurate readings that we might rightly divide the word of truth (2 Timothy 2.25). "8 How do you say: We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us? Indeed the lying pen of the scribes hath wrought falsehood.” “Jeremiah & wie || Factack ie Deuteronomy 23.7 nd he The Satanic Origins ofthe Kents, Who Killed Jesus? Rovelnesecomites Canaanite and Edomte tows 2 SloanSutheriand @ 18th Sop 2020 w Uncategorized Published by SloanVSutherland "Lam the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord” Viewmore postsPrevious Post Next Post Against the Judaizers The Jewish Ties of the Infamous Opponents of the Early Church Leave a Reply Enter your comment er Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. 8y continuing to use this website, you agree to thelr use Ea Totine out mare, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy