LQuantum Field Theory in The Space-Time of A Cosmic String - Linet1987
LQuantum Field Theory in The Space-Time of A Cosmic String - Linet1987
B. Linet
Unite Associee au Centre National de la Recherche Scient~fiqueNo. 769, Uniuersite Pierre er Marie Curie,
Institut Henri Poincare. 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
(Received 16 September 1986)
For a massive scalar field in the static cylindrically symmetric space-time describing a cosmic
string, we determine explicitly the Euclidean Green's function. We obtain also a n alternative local
form which allows us to calculate the vacuum energy-momentum tensor. In the case of a conformal
scalar field, we carry out completely the calculations.
where is defined by the case B > which is physically justified (on the
p2+po2+(z -zo)* cosmological level p - Then, for all points ( p , b , z )
coshv = (7720). and (po,do,zo)of space-time (1) such that the coordinates
~PPO d and do verify the inequalities
For certain calculations, we derived in our previous work7 -
a more convenient form for G. We restrict ourselves to
35
- 536 81987 The American Physical Society
35
- QUANTUM FIELD THEORY IN THE SPACE-TIME OF A . . . 537
G can be expressed as the sum of two terms biscalar G E ( x , x O )on the manifold which obeys the co-
variant equation
(0-m E -8(4)(X; X o )
2 ) ~= ,
where the quantities r, R , and FBhave the expressions where is the Laplacian operator, and which vanishes
when the points x and x o are infinitely separated. In our
metric ( I ) , we replace t by - i r and the Riemannian
metric can be written
z 2 O<B < 1
d s 2 = d ~ + d p 2 + ~ Z p 2 d d 2 + d with (9)
in the coordinate system (r,p,d,z) with p 2 0 and
0 d < 2 ~ Equation
. (8) takes the form
GE(x,xo)=-
2.rr
1
S -m
+m
~ ~ ~ , d , z ; ~ ~ , d ~ , z ~ ; ( m ~ + h. ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ) c ~ ~ h ( ~ - - r ~ ~ d h
Result (11) can be easily verified taking into account the formula
8(7-r0)=-
1
27~
1- c o s h ( r - r O ) d h .
+m
We are now in a position to determine the Green's function GE(x,xO). T O do this, we first integrate by parts integral
(4):
where
g,(<,*)= -
dl sinh({/B)
d < sinh<[cosh(</B) -cos$]
Then we apply formula ( 1 1) with G given by ( 13); we may interchange the order of integrations. We have thereby
where Jo denotes the Bessel function, we can perform the h integration in (14) and we obtain finally the integral form
B. LINET
where y is defined by
( Z -z0 )'
(r-ro)2+p2+po2+
coshy = ( ~ 2 0 ) .
~PPO
Result (16) is the desired Green's function which can be integrated for B = 1 to give the familiar Green's function
m
GE(x,x~)= ,/,
~ l ( [mr 2 + ( r - r o ) 2 ] " 2 )
4 ~ ~ [ r ~ + ( r -] r ~ )
for B =1 , (17 )
where
Result (19) is valid for all points x and x o of the manifold (9) such that the coordinates d and do verify inequalities ( 5 ) .
The first term in (19) is a solution to Eq. (10) which coincides with the usual Green's function in Euclidean space (by per-
forming the change of coordinate O=Bd). The second term G;(x,x,) and its derivatives are regular in the coincidence
limit x = x o
It may be of some interest to give the limit of G E ( x , x o )given by (16) when the mass m goes to zero. As J o ( 0 ) = 1, we
obtain obviously
Expression (21) corresponds to a result of ~ o w k e r 'on the Green's function, which is periodic in the imaginary Rindler
time, for a massless scalar field in a Rindler space-time.
T o regularize the vacuum expectation values of the energy-momentum tensor operator within the Euclidean theory of
quantum field, a standard prescription is the f-function regularization. However, in our present problem we point out
that there is no trace anomaly because the Riemann tensor of metric (9) vanishes identically. Moreover, expression (19)
of the Green's function G E ( x , x o )shows off the singular part which coincides with the usual Green's function. We can
ignore infinities arising from it because we are locally in a Euclidean space and these divergences are familiar. On the
other hand, the second term and its derivatives are regular in the coincidence limit x =x,; therefore, there is no problem
for well defining the vacuum expectation values.
We consider a general form of the energy-momentum tensor parametrized by a constant 6. A procedure similar to the
one of ~ a w k i n gyields
~
where V, (VPo) means covariant differentiation with respect to the coordinates x p ( x i ) . We check that
VPpG;(x,x) = m ' G ~ ( x , x). It should be remarked that ( p P v ( x )) will not depend on the coordinate r . Consequently, ex-
pression (22) gives the vacuum energy-momentum tensor in the space-time since the change of time coordinate is r=it.
T o determine ( p P v ( x ) )given by (22), the calculations are straightforward but give complicated expressions. We have
simple results for a conformal scalar field (i.e., <=
and m =O).
The limit of G;(x,xo) when the mass m goes to zero is
-
35 QUANTUM FIELD THEORY I N T H E SPACE-TIME OF A ...
'B. Linet, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 17, 1109 (1985); and also for an Survey, edited by S . W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge
extended cosmic string see J. R. Gott 111, Astrophys. J. 288, University Press, Cambridge, England, 19791, p. 639.
422 (1985);W. A. Hiscock, Phys. Rev. D 31, 3288 (1985). 6R. M. Wald, Commun. Math. Phys. 70, 221 (1979).
'A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rep. 121, 263 (19851, and references therein. 'B. Linet, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 45, 249 (1986).
3A. Vilenkin, Astrophys. J. Lett. 282, 51 (1984); C. J. Hogan 8J. S. Dowker, Phys. Rev. D 18, 1856 (1978).
and R. Narayan, Mon. Not. R . Astron. Soc. 211, 575 (1984). 9S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 55, 133 (1977).
4B. Linet, Phys. Rev. D 33, 1833 (1986). l q . M. Helliweil and D. A. Konkowski, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1918
5G. W. Gibbons, in General Relativity: A n Einstein Centenary (1986).