Obli Recit
Obli Recit
D owes C to build a fence. When D completes the Y accepts painted house using a different paint
fence, the obligation is extinguished—even if no brand without complaint → Y waives objection.
money changed hands.
Obligation is extinguished. Court may say this is a total loss if the purpose is racing.
If the fire happened after A was already late in delivering If the horse was for meat (to be slaughtered), the injury
it, A is still liable, even if it wasn’t his fault. doesn’t matter much, and A still has to deliver it (maybe
with minor compensation).
When the Obligation is NOT Extinguished
ARTICLE 1265
(Even Without Fault or Delay):
General Rule:
1. When the law requires liability even in loss (e.g., If a thing is lost while in the debtor’s possession,
Art. 1170 – if guilty of negligence). it is presumed to be his fault—unless he can
2. When there’s a stipulation (agreement) that prove otherwise.
debtor will still be liable even in case of
fortuitous event. When a thing is under the care of the debtor and it’s lost,
3. When the nature of the obligation involves risk the law assumes it was the debtor’s fault, unless he can
(e.g., insurance, transport of dangerous goods). give proof. But in cases of natural calamity, this
4. When the obligation is due to a crime (see Art. presumption does not apply.
1268).
D borrows C’s car. The car is stolen while in D’s garage.
ARTICLE 1263 It is presumed D was at fault unless he proves otherwise.
If the car was destroyed in an earthquake, and D proves
General Rule: it,
If the obligation is to deliver a generic thing, D is not liable.
the loss or destruction of any particular
object does not cancel the obligation.
ARTICLE 1266
A generic thing (like “100 sacks of rice”) doesn’t refer to
General Rule:
a specific object. The rule “genus nunquam perit” In obligations to do, the debtor is released if
applies – a class or kind of item never perishes. The performance becomes legally or physically
debtor can still provide another item of the same kind. impossible WITHOUT his fault.
A agreed to deliver 50 sacks of rice to B. A’s warehouse This refers to obligations to perform services or do
floods and the rice is destroyed. something. If it becomes impossible to do the task, the
debtor is released from responsibility—as long as it’s
not his fault.
A was hired to build a sculpture, but loses his This protects the creditor. Even if the debtor is no longer
arms in an accident. liable (because the item was lost due to a third party),
the creditor may directly sue that third party.
He is physically incapable, so the obligation is
extinguished. A promises to deliver a specific horse to B. T, a third party,
killed the horse.
A lawyer agrees to defend a client but later
becomes a judge (and can’t practice law). A is no longer liable to B, but B can sue T for damages.
A contractor agrees to build a bridge. A landslide caused → (1) If the thing is lost without fault or delay (Art. 1262);
by a typhoon makes construction life-threatening.
→ (2) If the act becomes physically or legally impossible
The court may release A from the obligation. (Art. 1266).
If the obligation arises from a crime, loss of the The law says so
thing does not release the debtor—unless the There’s a contract saying he’s liable even if the
item is lost
creditor refused the return of the item without
The obligation involves assumed risk
good reason.
The obligation arose from a crime
If someone is ordered to return stolen property and the
Q3: Does partial loss extinguish the obligation?
item is destroyed—even by accident—they are still
liable, unless the rightful owner refused to accept the
item. → Not automatically. The court decides based on how
serious the loss is.
A stole B’s car. A was ordered to return it. The car was
accidentally destroyed. Q1: X promises to deliver a carabao on July 31. It dies
on July 25. No proof of negligence.
A must pay for the value, unless B refused to accept the
return without valid reason. → Not liable. The carabao was lost before delay, and
there’s no fault. (Art. 1262)
ARTICLE 1269
Q2: X loses the thing before due date, without fault.
General Rule:
→ Yes, he is exempt if it is a specific thing, no fault, and
no delay. (Art. 1262)
If the obligation is extinguished due to loss, the
creditor inherits the right to go after third parties
Q3: Z (a third party) caused the loss.
who caused the loss.
→ Obligation of X to Y is extinguished.
D borrows money from C and pledges a diamond 2. The debt of D is guaranteed by G and secured by a
ring. pledge (stock certificate).
→ Later, the ring is found with D. (a) What if the debt is condoned?
→ Presumption: the pledge was waived, but the → The entire debt is extinguished, so both guaranty and
debt still exists. pledge are also extinguished (Art. 1273).
1. Condonation or remission of debt – A free act (b) What if the certificate is found with D?
where the creditor forgives or cancels the debt.
It can be express (clearly stated) or implied → Presumption that the pledge has been waived, but
(inferred from actions). debt still exists (Art. 1274).
2. Inofficious remission – A type of remission or
donation that exceeds what the law allows the
creditor to give (violating legitime of heirs).
SECTION 4 – Confusion or Merger of ARTICLE 1276
Rights General Rule:
ARTICLE 1275
If the merger happens in the principal debtor or
creditor, the obligation is extinguished, and this
General Rule: benefits the guarantors.
An obligation is extinguished from the moment the If the merger happens only in the guarantor, the
characters of debtor and creditor are merged in one principal obligation continues.
person.
A guarantor is a third party who promises to pay the
Confusion or merger of rights occurs when one person debt if the debtor fails. When the main debt is
becomes both the creditor and debtor of the same extinguished, the guaranty is also extinguished. But if the
obligation. Since no person can be obliged to pay guarantor becomes creditor, only the guaranty is
himself, the obligation is automatically extinguished. extinguished—the debtor still owes the debt.
1. The same person must be both principal debtor D owes C ₱10,000. G is the guarantor.
and creditor. C’s credit is assigned to D.
2. The confusion must be complete (total, not
partial).
→ D now becomes creditor and debtor →
obligation is extinguished.
Negotiable Note Merger:
→ G (guarantor) is also released from the
D owes C ₱10,000 via promissory note. obligation.
C indorses the note to E, and E to F.
F buys goods from D, and instead of paying cash,
2. Merger in Guarantor
gives the note back to D.
C assigns his right to collect to G, the guarantor.
→ D becomes his own creditor, so the obligation
is extinguished.
→ The guaranty is extinguished since G is now
the creditor.
2. Usufruct and Ownership:
→ But D (debtor) still owes the amount to G.
Z gives X a usufruct (right to use property) and
gives ownership to Y.
ARTICLE 127
Later, Y sells his ownership to X.
General Rule:
→ Since X now owns and uses the property, the
usufruct is extinguished due to merger.
In a joint obligation, confusion only extinguishes the
share of the creditor or debtor where the roles merge.
3. Mortgage:
It does not affect the shares of other debtors or
creditors.
D mortgages his land to C as security for a loan.
Later, D sells the land to C.
In a joint obligation, each debtor is liable for his own
share and each creditor can demand only his part. So, if
→ The mortgage (accessory) is extinguished, but
one of them becomes both debtor and creditor, only his
the debt remains because the principal
share is canceled.
obligation persists.
Joint obligation – An obligation where each
debtor is only responsible for his share, not the
whole debt.
Solidary obligation – An obligation where each
debtor is responsible for the entire debt, and
the creditor can demand full payment from any
one of them.
1. Joint Obligation: → But the principal obligation remains, and the
guarantor (now creditor) may still collect from the
A, B, and C owe D ₱9,000 jointly. debtor
D assigns the credit to A.
1. A, B, and C are jointly liable to D for ₱15,000. D assigns
→ A’s share (₱3,000) is extinguished by merger. his credit to C in exchange for goods. What is the effect?
→ B and C still owe ₱3,000 each to A (the new → In a joint obligation, C becomes his own creditor for
creditor). his ₱5,000 share.
A, B, and C are solidarily liable for ₱9,000. → A and B remain liable for ₱5,000 each—now payable
D assigns the credit to A. to C.
→ The entire obligation is extinguished. 2. What if the obligation of A, B, and C was solidary?
→ A can collect ₱3,000 each from B and C → In a solidary obligation, each is liable for the entire
through reimbursement. ₱15,000.
1. Confusion or Merger of Rights – A mode of → When D assigns the right to C, and C becomes one of
extinguishing an obligation when the roles of the solidary debtors, the entire debt is extinguished.
creditor and debtor meet in the same person
for the same obligation. → But C may reimburse A and B for their ₱5,000 shares.
2. Merger as a mode of extinguishment – Occurs
when the obligation is logically cancelled SECTION 5 — COMPENSATION
because a person cannot be obliged to fulfill an
obligation to himself.
ARTICLE 1278
1. What is the rationale behind confusion or merger as a
General Rule:
mode of extinguishing obligations?
For legal compensation to apply, these 5 requisites A guarantor may set up compensation for what the
must be present: creditor owes the principal debtor.
1. Both parties must be principal creditors and Even though a guarantor is not primarily liable, the law
debtors of each other. allows them to use compensation if it results in
2. Both debts must consist of money or extinguishing the main obligation and therefore also the
consumable things of the same kind and guaranty.
quality.
3. The debts must be due. A owes B ₱10,000. G is the guarantor.
4. The debts must be liquidated and demandable. B owes A ₱10,000.
5. There must be no retention or controversy
initiated by a third party. → G can invoke compensation to cancel A’s
obligation and thereby be released from liability.
Principal creditor/debtor – Direct parties to the
obligation, not just guarantors or agents. ARTICLE 1281
Consumable things – Items that are used up, like
rice or gasoline. General Rule:
Liquidated debt – The amount is certain or
clearly known.
Compensation may be total or partial:
Demandable – The debt is due and can be
enforced legally.
Total – If both debts are of the same amount.
Retention or controversy – Another person
Partial – If debts are unequal, it only cancels the
(third party) is claiming or withholding part of
smaller amount.
the debt.
A owes B ₱1,000.
1. All conditions met:
B owes A ₱800.
A owes B ₱1,000.
→ Partial compensation extinguishes ₱800. A
B owes A ₱1,000.
still owes ₱200.
→ Legal compensation takes place.
ARTICLE 1282
2. Guarantor cannot claim compensation:
General Rule:
Voluntary compensation is allowed even if the debts
A owes B ₱1,000 with G as guarantor.
are not yet due, as long as both parties agree.
B owes G ₱1,000.
Even if some legal requisites are lacking (e.g., debts are
→ No legal compensation. G is not a principal
not yet due), the parties may still agree to compensate
creditor of A.
their debts.
Debts that are rescissible or voidable may still be Legal compensation takes place even if debts are
compensated before being annulled by a court. payable in different places, but the party invoking
compensation must pay expenses of exchange or
These debts are valid until declared void. So they may be transport.
used for compensation until annulled.
A owes B ₱50,000 payable in Manila.
A owes B ₱10,000 (valid). B owes A ₱50,000 payable in Davao.
B claims A owes him ₱10,000 through a
fraudulent promissory note. → Compensation can happen, but A (who
claims compensation) must pay for shipping or
→ Before annulment, the two debts can be transfer costs.
compensated. But if annulled later,
compensation is reversed. ARTICLE 1287
Assignment of credit and its effects on compensation 1. A depositum (a trust-based deposit of goods),
depend on the debtor’s consent or knowledge. 2. A commodatum (loan for use), or
3. A claim for support granted by gratuitous title.
Three Scenarios:
A deposits a ring with B.
1. Debtor consents to the assignment: A owes B ₱10,000.
→ Debtor cannot claim compensation unless he → B cannot refuse to return the ring by claiming
reserved the right. compensation.
2. Debtor is notified but does not consent: B is A’s father. A owes B money.
→ He can claim compensation for debts before → B still has to provide support (as a legal
assignment, but not those incurred after. obligation), unless it’s support in arrears, which
may be compensated.
3. Debtor has no knowledge of assignment:
ARTICLE 1288
→ He can claim compensation for all debts
before and even after assignment, until he General Rule:
learns about it.
No compensation when one debt arises from civil
A owes B ₱30,000. liability due to a crime.
B owes A ₱20,000.
C steals D’s jewelry (worth ₱10,000).
→ Legal compensation occurs; A owes B C also lent ₱10,000 to D.
₱10,000.
→ C cannot claim compensation. Civil liability
B assigns his right to C. from a crime cannot be set off.
When all the requisites of Article 1279 are present, Obligations may be modified or extinguished by
legal compensation takes place automatically—no need novation through:
for consent or awareness.
1. Changing the object or principal conditions
Once all requirements are present, the law automatically 2. Substituting the person of the debtor
cancels the debts up to the matching amount—even if 3. Subrogating a third person in the rights of the
the parties are unaware. creditor
DEFINITIONS
It settles debts without actual transfer of Express – stated in clear, direct terms
money—just like simplified payment. Implied – old and new obligations are
incompatible
By Effect:
3. Can compensation happen if the things due are not
consumable? Extinctive (Total) – old obligation completely
extinguished
Yes, as long as they are of the same kind and Modificatory (Partial) – old obligation just
quality, like identical goods (e.g., horses, if modified
fungible).
By Subject:
General Rule: If the new obligation is void, the old one remains,
unless the parties intended otherwise.
Novation must be declared clearly or arise from
incompatible obligations. Effect of Void or Voidable Novation:
General Rule:
⚠ Novation is never presumed.
Novation is invalid if the original obligation was void,
It must be proven with clear intent or incompatibility unless the defect can be remedied (e.g., voidable and
between old and new obligations. ratified).
1. A creditor pays another preferred creditor → Yes, unless they benefit a third party who did not
2. A third party pays, with debtor’s approval consent to the novation.
3. A person interested (e.g., guarantor) pays even
without debtor’s knowledge
The new creditor steps into the shoes of the original 1. T (third person) tells C (creditor) that T will pay the
creditor and can enforce the same rights and debt of D. C agrees. Is D released?
guarantees (e.g., pledges, mortgages).
→ No, unless there’s an express agreement to release D.
Partial Subrogation (Art. 1304): This is expromisión, and without express release, D is still
liable.
If the original creditor was only partially paid, they are
preferred over the new creditor in case the debtor 2. D proposes that T substitutes him, and C agrees. Is D
becomes insolvent. still liable if T becomes insolvent?
1. Novation – Substitution or modification of an → No, unless D knew T was insolvent or it was of public
obligation by another, extinguishing the original knowledge at the time of substitution (delegación
2. Mixed Novation – Novation involving both a exception).
change in the subject and the parties
3. Expromisión – A third person assumes the 3. T pays C without D’s objection. What are T’s rights?
debtor’s obligation without the debtor
initiating → T is subrogated to C’s rights. T can now collect from D
4. Delegación – The original debtor proposes a what was paid to C (Art. 1236, 1237, 1302).
new debtor with the creditor’s consent
4. Illustrate a mixed novation:
1. Requisites of Novation:
A was obliged to deliver 10 laptops to B. Later, it
A prior valid obligation was agreed that A would deliver a generator to
Clear intent to novate C instead.
Extinguishment or modification of the old
obligation → This is mixed novation (change of object and
A new valid obligation creditor).
3. Effects: