Scribd
Upload
10 views2 pages

Feedback Comments Logical Fallacies Assignment

The feedback comments evaluate an assignment on logical fallacies in advertisements, categorizing it into four levels: Poor, Fair, Good, and Excellent. Key issues include a lack of understanding, minimal analysis, and disorganized structure in lower ratings, while higher ratings demonstrate strong understanding, relevant examples, and effective teamwork. Overall, the feedback emphasizes the importance of clarity, coherence, and depth in analysis.

Uploaded by

Haram Dior
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views2 pages

Feedback Comments Logical Fallacies Assignment

The feedback comments evaluate an assignment on logical fallacies in advertisements, categorizing it into four levels: Poor, Fair, Good, and Excellent. Key issues include a lack of understanding, minimal analysis, and disorganized structure in lower ratings, while higher ratings demonstrate strong understanding, relevant examples, and effective teamwork. Overall, the feedback emphasizes the importance of clarity, coherence, and depth in analysis.

Uploaded by

Haram Dior
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Feedback Comments for Logical Fallacies Assignment

Poor:

- The assignment lacks a clear understanding of logical fallacies and how they apply to

advertisements.

- There is minimal analysis, and the examples provided are either incorrect or do not effectively

illustrate the logical fallacies used in advertisements.

- The teamwork between members appears disjointed, with little collaboration evident in the final

product.

- The connection between the fallacies and the advertisement is weak, and the examples do not

align well with the intended message.

- The structure is disorganized, making it difficult to follow the argument or reasoning.

Fair:

- The assignment addresses the concept of logical fallacies but lacks depth in the analysis.

- Some examples are relevant, but more explanation is needed to show how these fallacies apply to

the advertisements presented.

- Teamwork is apparent, though the contributions from different members are not well integrated,

which affects the overall coherence.

- The connection between the fallacies and the advertisement could be clearer, as some examples

feel forced or disconnected from the advert's messaging.

- The structure is clear, but further refinement is needed in both analysis and integration of team

members' contributions.

Good:

- The assignment demonstrates a solid understanding of logical fallacies and applies them
reasonably well to the advertisements.

- The examples provided are relevant and help support the argument, though more detailed

explanations could improve the connection.

- Teamwork is evident, with most members contributing meaningfully, although there could be better

integration of ideas and smoother transitions between sections.

- The fallacies are mostly coherent with the advertisements, but there are a few instances where the

connection could be explained more clearly.

- The structure is organized, and the argument is logical, though further refinement would make the

overall analysis stronger.

Excellent:

- The assignment shows a strong understanding of logical fallacies and their application to

advertisements.

- The examples are clear, relevant, and thoughtfully explained, effectively demonstrating how

fallacies influence the advertisements.

- Teamwork is exceptional, with each member contributing to the project in a cohesive manner, and

the collaboration is reflected in the smooth flow of ideas.

- The fallacies and advertisements are well-coordinated, and the connection between the two is

clearly articulated throughout the work.

- The structure is well-organized, and the analysis is both thorough and insightful, showcasing a high

level of critical thinking and team collaboration.

You might also like