Jews of Medieval Christendom 1st Edition Robert Chazan PDF Download
Jews of Medieval Christendom 1st Edition Robert Chazan PDF Download
Chazan download
https://ebookbell.com/product/jews-of-medieval-christendom-1st-
edition-robert-chazan-1221678
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-jews-of-medieval-western-
christendom-10001500-chazan-7043128
https://ebookbell.com/product/at-the-gate-of-christendom-jews-muslims-
and-pagans-in-medieval-hungary-c1000-c1300-nora-berend-berend-27006666
https://ebookbell.com/product/at-the-gate-of-christendom-jews-muslims-
and-pagans-in-medieval-hungary-c-1000c-1300-nora-berend-7007852
Living With The Law Gender And Community Among The Jews Of Medieval
Egypt Oded Zinger
https://ebookbell.com/product/living-with-the-law-gender-and-
community-among-the-jews-of-medieval-egypt-oded-zinger-51442622
Conflict And Coexistence Archbishop Rodrigo And The Muslims And Jews
Of Medieval Spain Lucy K Pick
https://ebookbell.com/product/conflict-and-coexistence-archbishop-
rodrigo-and-the-muslims-and-jews-of-medieval-spain-lucy-k-pick-2484786
https://ebookbell.com/product/on-the-margins-of-a-minority-leprosy-
madness-and-disability-among-the-jews-of-medieval-europe-1st-edition-
ephraim-shohamsteiner-professor-haim-watzman-51423408
https://ebookbell.com/product/regional-identities-and-cultures-of-
medieval-jews-1st-edition-javier-castao-editor-36453378
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-persecution-of-jews-in-medieval-
spain-charles-river-editors-232140908
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-absent-jews-kurt-forstreuter-and-
the-historiography-of-medieval-prussia-cordelia-hess-51749816
This page intentionally left blank
The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom, 1000–1500
isbn-13 978-0-521-61664-5paperback
isbn-10 0-521-61664-6 paperback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls
for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not
guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
For
Jonah and Adam
Gabriel and Nathan
Arlo and Eve
CONTENTS
Epilogue 285
Notes 289
Bibliography 313
Index 321
MAPS
ENGLAND
POLAND
KINGDOM
OF
GERMANY
FRANCE
KINGDOM HUNGARY
OF
KINGDOM
BURGUNDY OF ITALY
LEÓN
NAVARRE
CASTILE SMALL
COUNTIES PRINCIPALITY
OF BENEVENTO
PAPAL
STATES
CALIPHATE OF CÓRDOVA
COUNTY
OF CAPUA
PRINCIPALITY
OF SALERNO
M E D I T BYZANTINE
TERRITORY
E R R
A N
E
A
N
S
E MUSLIM
A TERRITORY
An observer viewing world Jewry in the year 1000 would have readily
discerned an obvious Jewish demographic distribution and an equally
obvious configuration of Jewish creativity. The oldest, largest, and
most creative Jewish communities were located in the Muslim sphere,
stretching from Mesopotamia westward through the eastern littoral
of the Mediterranean Sea, across North Africa, and over onto the
Iberian peninsula. Somewhat smaller, but still sizeable and venerable
were the Jewish communities of the Byzantine Empire. Our putative
observer might have noted, as an afterthought, the small Jewish settle-
ments in western Christendom, huddled along the northern shores
of the Mediterranean Sea, in Italy, southern France, and northern
Spain; he might have – reasonably enough – not even bothered to
mention them, for they would hardly have seemed worthy of serious
attention.
Our observer would almost certainly have known that this pattern
of Jewish demography and creativity had been established more than
a thousand years earlier, long before the rise of Islam to its position
of power during the seventh century. He would have been aware
that, subsequent to the exile of the Jews from their homeland in
the sixth pre-Christian century, two major centers of Jewish life had
emerged, one as the result of Jewish resettlement in Palestine and the
other as a result of the decision of Jews to secure for themselves a
permanent place in Mesopotamia. He would have known that the
great religious–political leaders of world Jewry had been the patri-
archs of Palestinian Jewry and the exilarchs of Mesopotamian Jewry;
2 The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom
that the classical texts of post-biblical Judaism were the (Palestinian)
Mishnah, the Jerusalem (Palestinian) Talmud, and the Babylonian
(Mesopotamian) Talmud; that the distinguished rabbis whose teach-
ings were enshrined in the Mishnah and the two Talmuds were all
residents of either the Holy Land or the Mesopotamian territory that
Jews anachronistically called Babylonia.
Our hypothetical observer would also have recalled that Palestinian
Jews had, from a fairly early date, made their way westward, creating
new centers of Jewish life all along the Mediterranean shorelines.
He would have been aware that the centers in what are today Syria
and Egypt were the oldest and largest of these western communities.
Newer and smaller settlements stretched out all along the southern
and northern coastlines of the Mediterranean Sea – across North
Africa, through Asia Minor, and into what is today Italy, southern
France, and Spain.
With the rise of Islam during the seventh century and its remark-
able conquests, the overwhelming majority of world Jewry fell under
the rule of the new religion and the empire built upon it. The only
Jewries left outside the realm of Islam were the Jewish communities
of the shrunken Byzantine Empire, along the northeastern shores of
the Mediterranean Sea, and those of the relatively backward western
Christian states in Italy, southern France, and northern Spain, along
the northwestern shores of that same sea.
While we do not have the kind of observations just now suggested
from the year 1000, we do possess the writings of a European Jew
who traveled from west to east during the middle decades of the
twelfth century. This Jew, Benjamin of Tudela, did not attempt the
kind of assessments just now suggested. However, his travelogue –
generally rather dry and boring – does provide a first-hand sense of
the various areas of Jewish settlement he encountered.1
Benjamin made his way down the Ebro River from his home
town, reached the Mediterranean, visited some major Spanish port
cities, traversed much of southern France, and crossed over into Italy
and down the peninsula. Throughout this portion of his journey, he
encountered a variety of Jewish communities. The largest of these
numbered a few hundred souls or males or households.2 When Ben-
jamin reached the Byzantine Empire, he encountered much greater
urban enclaves and much larger Jewish communities. In Constantino-
ple, he found a city far exceeding in size, wealth, and culture anything
he had seen further west. The Jewish community numbered some
Introduction 3
three thousand. Again, it is not clear whether this means souls, males,
or households. In any case, the Jewish community of Constantinople
was many times larger than any Benjamin had encountered in the
Roman Catholic sphere of southern Europe.
When Benjamin entered the realm of Islam, he was overwhelmed
by what he found. The city of Baghdad, then arguably the greatest city
in the Western world, captivated him. His description of the size and
splendor of the city reveals an utterly enthralled visitor. The Jewish
communities of the Islamic realm in general far surpassed in size and
strength those of the Roman Catholic world from which he came. In
Damascus, Benjamin found three thousand Jews; in Alexandria, seven
thousand Jews; in Baghdad, the staggering number of forty thousand
Jews.3 In Baghdad, according to Benjamin, there were twenty-eight
synagogues and a Jewish officialdom that enjoyed remarkable prestige
and respect in the caliph’s court. While Benjamin limits himself to
fairly specific and often pedestrian observations, his travelogue indi-
cates clearly an Islamic realm far superior to Byzantium and Roman
Catholic Europe, and Jewish communities that reflect the same order-
ing of size, strength, and creativity. Even though Benjamin traveled
at a time when the balance of power had already begun to shift, he
still found that the Jewries under Muslim domination were larger and
more fully developed than those under Christian control.
Pressed to predict what the future might hold, our hypothetical
observer in the year 1000 would have assumed that the known config-
uration of Jewish life would surely last into the indeterminate future.
In general, of course, most of us have great difficulty in imagining
radically altered circumstances. Such a lack of imagination would
have hardly been the only factor influencing our observer, how-
ever. For there was nothing in the year 1000 to suggest that radical
change was in the offing. The constellation of world power appeared
remarkably stable. Islam’s domination seemed to be challenged seri-
ously by no one, neither the Greek Christians of the eastern sectors
of the Mediterranean nor the Latin Christians of the western sectors
of Europe. Our observer of the year 1000 would surely have con-
cluded that the contemporary power structure was unlikely to shift
and that Jewish life would thus continue along the lines currently
discernible.
Benjamin, traveling and writing in the middle of the twelfth
century, had the benefit of a century and a half of change. By time he
made his journey, western Christian forces had driven the Muslims
0 150 300 450 km
R
E
have been labeled.
D
R
O
IC
LITHUANIA
N
O
T
U
TE
ENGLAND
GREAT
POLAND
LITTLE
GERMAN POLAND
BOHEMIA
MORAVIA
PRINCIPALITIES
AUSTRIA
FRANCE STYRIA
HUNGARY
N Y
S CO
A
G
NAVARRE
PAPAL
L
STATES
ON
GA
CASTILE G
A
TU
A
POR
F SICI LY
M O
GRANADA
DO
M E D I T
G
E R R
IN
A N
E K
A
N
S
E
A
L I T H U A N I A
ENGLAND
T
S AN
ER AB POLAND
D
GERMAN
BR
LANDS OF
AN
FL
THE BOHEMIAN
CROWN
PRINCIPALITIES
BURGUNDY
H U N G A R Y
FRANCE
SAVOY
NAVARRE
PAPAL
L
STATES
ON
GA
CASTILE G
A N
R
A
TU
P
A
L
E
S
POR
GRANADA M E D I T
E R R
A N SICILY
E
A
N
S
E
A
The spatial boundaries of this study are easy to delineate and are
hardly controversial. The designation “western Christendom” points
to the distinction between the eastern and western areas of the Chris-
tian world, with the eastern centered in the imperial court at Con-
stantinople and the western centered in the papal court at Rome. On
another level, eastern Christendom was constructed around Greek
language and culture, while western Christendom was constructed
around Latin, its linguistic derivatives, and its culture. With the pas-
sage of time, these two segments of the Christian world pulled further
away from one another. This process of disengagement and differ-
entiation culminated in the bloody Fourth Crusade of 1204 and the
sacking by western Christian troops of the eastern Christian imperial
city of Constantinople.8
While there was considerable unity within western Christendom –
religious, cultural, and political – that unity should by no means be
overstated. This vast area harbored considerable differences as well.
The fault lines were both horizontal and vertical. Perhaps the most
significant fault line lay in the distinction between the Mediterranean
lands of southern Europe and the more remote lands of the north.
The Mediterranean lands of the south had been fully absorbed into
the Roman Empire and had been richly infused with Roman civiliza-
tion and culture. Remnants of Roman civilization and culture were
(and are) everywhere palpable across the southern tier of Europe. In
contrast, the lands of northern Europe had been only brushed by
the contact with Rome and had preserved much of their Germanic
heritage.9 In a general way, the southern sector of medieval western
Christendom was far more advanced in the year 1000 than were the
areas of the north. That situation, however, was to change rapidly
and dramatically.
The remarkable vitalization of western Christendom subsequent
to the year 1000 took place most markedly in the heretofore backward
north. By the year 1500, England and France had emerged as large
and powerful monarchies on the Western scene, contesting Spain for
preeminence. Indeed, part of the French kingdom’s success lay in its
absorption of previously independent southern territories into the
expanded royal domain, centered in the north. Paris and London
were the greatest cities of medieval western Christendom by the year
10 The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom
1500; strikingly, they had both been backward provincial towns five
hundred years earlier. There is perhaps no more eloquent testimony to
the centrality of northern Europe in the great awakening of medieval
western Christendom that took place between 1000 and 1500.10
There is a second major fault line as well, one that proceeds on
a vertical axis, and that is the distinction – particularly noteworthy
in the north – between western Europe, on the one hand, and cen-
tral and eastern Europe on the other. In the year 1000, the most
potent political authority in western Christendom seemed to be the
German emperor. Rooted in imperial lore and tradition, the German
throne seemed likely to remain the strongest political power among
the emerging states of western Christendom. Such was not, however,
to be the case. The far less imposing kings of France, England, and
Spain learned how to manipulate the feudal system to their advantage,
slowly converting local rule and royal prerogative into large, stable,
and increasingly puissant monarchies. Germany slipped far behind its
more westerly neighbors in economic development, political matu-
rity, and cultural creativity. Further east, at the fringe of medieval
western Christendom, such kingdoms as Hungary and Poland slowly
began to develop by the end of our period.
Finally, there is yet one more important geographic distinction,
involving interior areas of western Christendom and those exposed
to outside forces. On many levels, differences emerged between those
lands generally insulated from outside aggression and with a relatively
homogeneous population (in which Jews were prominent as the only
legitimate dissenters), on the one hand, and territories that bordered
on other realms and in which populations were heterogeneous, on
the other.11 The lands of the east – Italy in the south and Hungary and
Poland in the north – were very much exposed to external intrusion,
as was the Iberian peninsula in the southwest. There were salient
differences between exposed and interior areas in terms of majority
self-image and in terms of the populations with which the Christian
majority (even in a few instances the Christian ruling minority) had
to deal.
We shall have to be constantly aware of these important geographic
distinctions. They will play a key role in understanding the roots
of Jewish life in the south, the establishment of important Jewish
communities in the rapidly developing north, the banishment of these
new Jewish centers to the eastern peripheries of northern Europe
toward the end of our period, and the eventual disappearance of
Introduction 11
almost all Jewish life from the western sectors of Europe by the year
1500. It is impossible to make the kind of generalizations necessary
in an overview such as this without occasionally slighting one or
another geographic sector of large and complex medieval western
Christendom. Ideally, there should be available more focused studies
of medieval Jewish life for each of the geographic regions included
in medieval western Christendom.12
While the geographic parameters of this study are fairly easy to
specify, the temporal boundaries are somewhat more difficult. The
designation “medieval” is fraught with problems. Medievals would
never of course have identified themselves as medievals; they very
much saw themselves as moderni, that is to say moderns, the lat-
est link in the chain of human history. The terms “Middle Ages”
and “medieval” came into being as the medieval synthesis began to
unravel; they were terms of opprobrium, used to highlight the alleged
backwardness and benightedness of the period that stretched from
late antiquity to the onset of the Renaissance. Generally, this nega-
tive sense of the Middle Ages focused on the purportedly suffocating
centrality of religion in every sphere of human endeavor. This cen-
trality of religion – monotheistic religion at that – contrasted with
the more open society of ancient Rome and with the more open
society that the men and women of the Renaissance hoped to create.
Out of this backlash the pejorative term “medieval” was fashioned.
In practical terms, how does this view of the Middle Ages trans-
late into tangible dating for the beginning and end of the medieval
period? This is an extremely difficult question to answer. Scholars
have differed regularly as to the onset and conclusion of the Middle
Ages. Happily, for our purposes, the debate over the beginnings of
the Middle Ages is irrelevant. As already noted, significant Jewish
presence in medieval western Christendom did not emerge until the
end of the first Christian millennium, the point in time when the
region began its long ascent toward dominance in the Western world.
Thus, whatever “medieval” might mean in the abstract, for this spe-
cific study of the Jews of medieval western Christendom it identifies
a period that begins around the year 1000.13
The end point for this study is more problematic. Once again,
there is considerable scholarly dispute as to marking the close of the
Middle Ages. Clearly, the Middle Ages ended at different points in
time in diverse sectors of western Christendom – generally earlier in
the western areas and later in the eastern areas. Since by the fourteenth
12 The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom
century the process of removal of the Jewish population to the eastern
edges of western Christendom was well under way, for the bulk
of European Jewry medieval conditions ended quite late. For the
purposes of this study, however, the adjective “medieval” will be
attached to western Christendom, not to the Jews. This will be a
history of the Jews in medieval western Christendom, rather than a
history of medieval Jewish circumstances in western Christendom.
As the medieval synthesis began to disintegrate, toward the close
of the fifteenth century, our story will conclude, even though Jews
continued to live under medieval conditions for centuries to come
in the northeastern areas of Europe.
The divergences within the Jewish communities of medieval west-
ern Christendom make the terminal date of 1500 sometimes irrele-
vant, sometimes inappropriate, and in one major case highly appro-
priate. The year 1500 is obviously irrelevant to English Jewry, whose
history came to a close in 1290, and to French Jewry, whose cre-
ative history ended in 1306. It means little for the history of German
and eastern European Jewish history. The year 1500 is actually prob-
lematic for the history of Italian Jewry, for which most historians
see the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries as a unified epoch.14 1500
is of course highly appropriate for Iberian Jewry, given the expul-
sion from Aragon and Castile in 1492 and from Portugal in 1497.
Again, the date has been chosen out of consideration of the Chris-
tian majority, rather than any special sector of the diversified Jewish
minority.
Thus, the temporal boundaries of this study will be the years 1000
and 1500. During this five-hundred-year period, the old Jewish com-
munities of the south expanded markedly and a new set of Jewish
communities was created in the north; both sets of Jewish communi-
ties developed through the thirteenth century with measures of suc-
cess and failure; they disintegrated subsequently in the more advanced
areas of western Europe and were reconstituted on the eastern periph-
eries of western Christendom, especially in the north. Despite all the
shortcomings and failures, the bulk of world Jewry made its transition
into the rapidly developing Christian orbit, a change that would not
be undone down to the present.
In some ways, the shortest word in my title – “of” – has pre-
sented the most difficulties. I vacillated regularly between The Jews in
Medieval Western Christendom and The Jews of Medieval Western Chris-
tendom. The first title suggests the relative isolation of the Jews whom
we shall be studying; the second integrates them somewhat into their
Introduction 13
European ambience. I ultimately opted for the latter title, out of the
strong conviction that medieval Europe was far more than simply
a terrain on which Jewish life unfolded. Problems aside – and they
were manifold – the Jews upon whom we shall focus were very much
a part of the medieval European scene. They spoke the language of
their land; they were integrated into the economic and political struc-
tures of their societies; their cultural and religious lives were deeply
affected by their environment; they influenced – for good and ill –
the majority ambience within which they found themselves.15
th e mu sl i m le gac y
While it may seem somewhat strange to begin with the Muslim
legacy as part of the necessary backdrop to this study of Jewish life in
medieval western Christendom, there are a number of justifications
for so doing. First of all, prior to the year 1000, the bulk of world-
wide Jewry – as we have seen – was to be found within the Muslim
sphere. This meant that the Muslim world had enjoyed far greater
contact with a Jewish minority than had western Christendom and
had, as a result, developed far fuller policies for dealing with toler-
ated minority communities in general and with the Jews in partic-
ular. The Jews absorbed into medieval western Christendom from
the year 1000 onwards had their expectations fashioned in no small
measure from their prior experience in the Islamic world. Equally
important, the Jews absorbed into medieval western Christendom
were deeply steeped in the vibrant culture of the medieval Muslim
world and brought much of that culture with them into their new
Christian environment. Finally, the situation of the Jews in the Mus-
lim sphere will recurrently offer enlightening contrasts with Jewish
life in medieval western Christendom.2
Islam emerged onto the world scene very much in the mold of
biblical Israel, as a political and religious unity. In utterly unexpected
fashion, the Muslim armies broke out of the Arabian peninsula and
conquered in almost every direction, creating one of the Western
world’s great empires in the process. The populations subjugated
by the Muslim armies were vast and heterogeneous. The victori-
ous Islamic authorities divided the non-Muslim subject population
into two camps, that of the polytheists who had no intrinsic rights
and that of the monotheistic precursors of Islam, meaning essentially
Jews and Christians. This latter group did have a set of basic rights, to
be enjoyed in quid pro quo fashion. Jews and Christians were entitled
to physical security and the right to observe their own traditions, in
return for political loyalty to the Muslim regime, tax revenues, and
acknowledgement through a set of stipulated limitations of a status
inferior to that of what ultimately became an Islamic majority.
The guarantees of physical and spiritual security were by and large
maintained throughout the early centuries of the Middle Ages. There
are few recorded instances of Muslim infringement on these rights
during this period. In return, the Jews did prove loyal to their Muslims
rulers and did produce the obligatory tax revenues. The demand for
Prior legacies 25
inferior Jewish status had a checkered history. To an extent, it was
maintained; to an extent, it was neglected. Jews recurrently evaded
the restrictions supposedly incumbent upon them and rose to heights
of wealth, social standing, and political power. One of the areas in
which the restrictions were most regularly evaded and in which Jews
frequently achieved wealth and power was the Iberian peninsula,
where eventual Christian conquest was to bring into the Christian
orbit large numbers of Jews accustomed to considerable latitude in
lifestyle.
As we shall see, Jews in post-1000 Christendom were subjected
to more or less the same set of theoretical policies. The differences,
however, are instructive. As Islam developed, Jews were only one
of its monotheistic precursors; fundamental Christian stances toward
the Jews were formed at a point when Jews were the sole monothe-
istic precursor community, making the Christian–Jewish relationship
much more focused and intense. Whereas Islam saw itself simply as the
third and final of the monotheistic revelations, the Christian relation-
ship to Judaism and the Jews was – as we shall shortly see – much more
involved, convoluted, and emotionally charged.3 Moreover, the pop-
ulation of the medieval Muslim world was far more heterogeneous
than its Christian counterpart; this heterogeneity again provided an
ease and latitude by and large missing in western Christendom.
Westerners today often fail to appreciate the extent to which the
Islamic world far outstripped its Christian counterparts through the
first half of the Middle Ages. We have earlier utilized the Jewish
traveler Benjamin of Tudela to convey some sense of this imbalance,
which was military, economic, technological, and cultural. The last is
especially important for our purposes. The Jews living in the vibrant
Muslim sphere were thoroughly conversant with majority culture.
They, like medieval Jews in general, spoke the language of their
environment, which in this case was Arabic. Since Arabic was the
written language as well, Jews had entrée into the dominant high cul-
ture and were creatively challenged by it. The Jews immigrating into
medieval western Christendom brought with them the high culture
of the Islamic world, which constituted simultaneously a challenge
to Jewish identity and a stimulus to Jewish creativity.
The institutional framework for maintaining Jewish life as a minor-
ity community in the medieval Muslim world was fully developed.
Alongside a rich complex of local institutions, there existed a set
of centralized institutions that claimed roots well back in antiquity.
26 The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom
The exilarchate housed in Baghdad claimed direct descent from the
Davidic dynasty; the great academies likewise housed in Baghdad
could be traced back into the period of the evolution of the
Babylonian Talmud. The antiquity and central authority of these
institutions contrasts strikingly with the sense of newness and limited
authority of the Jewish institutions of medieval western Christendom.
The creativity of the Muslim environment and its Jewish minority
resulted in considerable augmentation of an evolving Jewish cultural
legacy. The traditional areas of Jewish study, focused around the Bible
and the Babylonian Talmud, were much enhanced. In biblical stud-
ies, a new emphasis on lexical and grammatical accuracy emerged; in
rabbinic studies, the first efforts to examine closely and mine the rich
and diffuse talmudic corpus are discernible. In addition, new avenues
of cultural creativity developed. The most prominent of these innova-
tive areas were theological and philosophical speculation and secular
poetry. In both instances, the broad and stimulating environment
encouraged the Jewish minority to experiment with new forms and
ideas. Quickly, these Jews made the new cultural outlets their own.
To be sure, such innovation inevitably raised hackles in some sectors
of the Jewish community. Conflict around the new creativity was
inevitable and quickly materialized.
While Jewish identity in the medieval Muslim world was not
directly challenged by a majority propensity toward missionizing,
Islam was successful nonetheless in attracting polytheists, Jews, and
Christians to its ranks. Precisely how deeply these conversions cut
into the Jewish community is not clear. In any case, the conversions
were not the result of concentrated Muslim efforts to reach out to the
other monotheistic communities. There were no identifiable struc-
tures for regularly engaging Jews and Christians with Islamic truth,
and there is relatively little in the way of Muslim anti-Jewish and anti-
Christian polemical literature. As a result, there is likewise relatively
little in the way of an anti-Islamic polemical literature created by the
Jews, since there was no genuine defensive need for such a literature.
The greatest challenge to Jewish belief and identity emanated from
the philosophic inclinations of the period. Medieval Islamic culture
engaged profoundly the riches of Greco-Roman civilization, pre-
served much of that civilization through extensive translation, and
expanded the Greco-Roman legacy in its own terms. Many of the
foundations of Greco-Roman thought were inimical to monotheis-
tic principles, challenging simultaneously traditional Islam, Judaism,
Prior legacies 27
and Christianity. The best minds of the period – Muslim, Jewish,
and Christian – were absorbed by the effort to mediate between their
received religious traditions and the impressive philosophic legacy of
Greece and Rome.
Jews lived all across the medieval Muslim world, from the great
centers of the Middle East across North Africa and over onto the
Iberian peninsula. People and ideas passed freely from east to west
and back. The large Jewish communities of North Africa and espe-
cially the Jewish settlements of the Islamic Iberian peninsula con-
stituted a considerable reservoir of new Jewish recruits to medieval
western Christendom. In some instances – particularly in the Iberian
peninsula – the transition was involuntary, as Christian armies added
ever larger portions of Spain to the realm of Christianity. In other
instances, movement from the Islamic sphere to western Christendom
represented a conscious choice on the part of Jews attracted by
the dynamic development of western Christendom. In both cases,
the Jewish communities of western Christendom were demograph-
ically and culturally strengthened by the flow of immigrants. The
enlarged Jewish population heightened Christian sensitivity to the
Jewish minority, reinforcing traditional concerns and creating new
anxieties. These Jews who had now become, in one way or another,
part of western Christendom brought with them expectations of the
ruling majority, patterns of minority existence, and a richly developed
cultural legacy.
th e c h ri st i an le gac y
Awareness of the Islamic legacy provides us, on the one hand, with an
understanding of the backdrop for Jewish life in post-1000 western
Christendom, since so many of the immigrants came from the Mus-
lim sphere and brought with them political and social expectations
and a rich cultural legacy. At the same time, awareness of the Islamic
stance toward Judaism and the Jews affords us a number of extremely
useful contrasts, which serve to highlight the special tensions that
shaped Jewish experience in the Christian orbit; this awareness indi-
cates how unusual Christian–Jewish relations have been over the ages,
how complex the stances with which Christianity has encountered
its Jewish rival.
Two contrasts are especially helpful. The first involves the early
development of the two faiths and their accession to power. As noted,
28 The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom
Islam emerged from its earliest days – like biblical Israel – as a religious
polity, with a conviction that the political and religious spheres of life
were unified. Islamic tradition projected Muhammed as a prophetic
communal leader and ruler, along the lines of the Israelite Moses.
Muhammed both brought laws and led the way toward their imple-
mentation. He was also a military conqueror, in this sense combining
the roles of both Moses and Joshua in Israelite history. By contrast,
the founding figure in Christianity, Jesus, exercised no worldly power,
sending forth his disciples on a distinctly religious mission of teach-
ing new truth to the world. It was only centuries later, at a point
when Christian missionizing had been highly successful and an effec-
tive ecclesiastical hierarchy had been fashioned, that power over the
political apparatus of the pre-existent Roman Empire was achieved.
For the history of the Jews in medieval western Christendom, this
contrast had potent implications. It meant that the Jews in Christen-
dom found themselves in an environment pervaded by the notion of
both ecclesiastical and temporal leadership. To an extent, this bifur-
cated authority held out benefits to the Jewish minority; it allowed
for the playing off of one leadership cohort against the other. At the
same time, the bifurcated authority was in some respects harmful,
in that it accorded considerable power to an ecclesiastical leadership
group that could afford to be relatively unconcerned with tempo-
ral gain and loss. In any case, bifurcated authority was a reality with
which the Jews of medieval western Christendom regularly had to
contend.
Far more important for Jewish fate was the importance of prose-
lytizing in the Christian scheme of things. A faith that had come to
power through religious suasion could never forget the importance
of that suasion. There were of course periods in which the mission-
izing impulse was relatively dormant; it could never, however, be
neglected in the long term. The extent to which Jews might become
the objects of missionizing involved complex and contradictory con-
siderations. There were good reasons to make the Jews secondary,
given for example their relatively small numbers and long record of
resistance. As we shall see, there were equally compelling reasons to
make missionizing among the Jews a very high priority.
A second contrast between Islam and Christianity has to do with
their relationships to Judaism and is – from the Jewish perspective – yet
more significant. Islam developed on the Arabian peninsula among a
new human community of believers. It quite simply proclaimed itself
Prior legacies 29
an innovative religious vision. Fully aware of the prior monotheistic
traditions of Judaism and Christianity, Islam venerated these prior
traditions to an extent, but proclaimed its supersession of both. The
break was clean – a new place, a new people, a new revelation,
and a new corpus of authoritative Scripture. By contrast, Chris-
tianity emerged out of a geographic and physical Jewish matrix and
developed an extremely complex and tormented relationship to that
matrix. The complexities of that relationship form the most critical
element for the evolution of Jewish life in medieval western Christen-
dom. For centuries, the complex Christian–Jewish relationship was
central to Christian thinking only in theoretical terms and exerted lit-
tle impact on Jews, who were concentrated in the Muslim realm. The
augmented Jewish presence in the western Christian world made this
complex relationship far more important than it had previously been
to the Christian majority, crucial to the fate of the Jewish minor-
ity, and critical to our understanding of the history of the Jews in
medieval western Christendom.4
Because of the very special circumstances of its early history, Chris-
tianity has had a complicated and ambivalent relationship toward the
Jewish matrix out of which it was spawned. This complicated and
ambivalent relationship includes elements of deepest respect and – at
the same time – elements of deepest hostility. For Christians, Jews
have been viewed, over the ages, as the very noblest of humanity
in some senses, while being perceived in other respects as the very
worst of the human species. This ambiguous and ambivalent Chris-
tian relationship with Judaism and the Jews set the terms for Jewish
life throughout medieval western Christendom and demands expli-
cation as the critical element in the pre-1000 legacy that would affect
subsequent Jewish life in medieval western Christendom.5
In order to gain some sense of this complexity and ambivalence, we
must briefly trace broad lines of early Christian history (which cre-
ated the complexity and ambivalence), identify the apologetic stance
developed by Christians to differentiate themselves from Judaism and
Jews, examine the ecclesiastical doctrine and policies established at
the point in time that Christians ascended to power in the Roman
world, and conclude by ascertaining the major elements in Christian
imagery of Judaism and the Jews. Superficially, it was the doctrine and
policies of Christianity – more specifically the doctrine and policies
of the Roman Catholic Church – that overtly affected the Jews of
medieval western Christendom. At a less obvious, but even deeper
30 The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom
level, Jewish life in medieval western Christendom was shaped by
the imagery that everyday Christians bore of their Jewish neighbors.
Christian policy toward and imagery of Judaism and the Jews set the
stage for Jewish life in medieval western Christendom.
Our initial focus on pre-1000 Christian doctrine, policy, and
imagery should by no means be taken to imply that they were destined
to remain static during the period between 1000 and 1500. Religious
thinking is generally characterized by organic growth and develop-
ment. One of the critical elements in declining Jewish circumstances –
as we shall see – was a hardening of ecclesiastical policy toward the
Jews and a corresponding deterioration of the image of Judaism and
the Jews. Both these processes will be examined as important com-
ponents in the history of the Jews in medieval western Christen-
dom. For the moment, we shall turn our attention to the pre-1000
legacy, a legacy already rich and complex. This legacy set important
parameters for evolving Jewish circumstances in medieval western
Christendom.
The history of Jesus of Nazareth and his immediate followers can-
not be reconstructed in modern scholarly terms. Our inability to
recapture the reality of Jesus and his disciples results from a total lack
of data from his immediate time period and circumstances. What we
today know of Jesus is derived from sources composed many decades
after his death, when the vision he enunciated had undergone con-
siderable alteration. Now, if we do not have sources from the lifetime
of Jesus himself, why are modern scholars so certain that the sources
we do have – composed a number of decades after his death – come
from altered circumstances and reflect shifts in his original vision?
The answer to that question lies in historical realities of which we
can be relatively certain.
It seems obvious to the majority of students of early Christian-
ity that Jesus and his immediate followers lived within the fractious
Jewish community of first-century Palestine and were part and par-
cel of that Jewish community, sharing its assumptions, its concerns,
and its uncertainties. The Jewish community of first-century Pales-
tine lived under the stress of Roman domination, with its members
taking differing stances toward their Roman overlords. Some first-
century Palestinian Jews were comfortable enough with Roman rule;
others found it utterly intolerable. This Jewish community, plagued
by dissension in the realm of politics, was further fragmented by reli-
gious contention as well. Alternative visions of the historic covenant
Prior legacies 31
between God and the people of Israel were abroad in the land at this
time.
Happily, we do have some first-century evidence of Jewish life
during this frantic period. The first-century Jewish historian Josephus
alerts us nicely to some of the fragmentation in first-century Jewish
life. Yet more strikingly, from the writings of the first-century Dead
Sea community we gain the sense of one vibrant sub-group of Jews,
wiped out during Roman suppression of the Jewish uprising that
began in the year 66. In these writings, we encounter a group of
Jews deeply critical of the official leadership in Jerusalem, committed
to what they believed to be purification of Jewish faith, and very
much Bible-centered in their view of history. In fact, as they read
closely the words of the prophets of Israel, the members of the Dead
Sea community became convinced that these prophets were in fact
predicting important events in their own communal experience.
In the tumultuous setting that spawned the Dead Sea community,
Jesus of Nazareth preached his own particular vision of the covenant
between God and Israel. He brought this vision to his Jewish followers
in the language of his community (either Hebrew or Aramaic) and
was surely viewed by friend and foe alike as a Jew, one of those –
like the Dead Sea group – highly dissatisfied with current religious
leadership and norms. Unlike the Dead Sea community, however,
Jesus and his immediate followers did not leave us their Hebrew or
Aramaic writings.
The very first writings from the Jesus movement that have come
down to us derive from the pen of a diaspora, Greek-speaking Jew
named Saul of Tarsus, who took the name Paul upon his acceptance
of the vision of Jesus. Saul, who never encountered Jesus first-hand,
thought and wrote in Greek, not the Hebrew or Aramaic of Jesus
and his immediate followers; his preaching was addressed largely to
diaspora Jews, not the Palestinian Jews among whom Jesus circulated;
in many cases, Paul brought his message to non-Jews as well. Thus,
even without certainty as to Jesus’ original message, the important
linguistic and social shifts reflected in the activities and writings of
Paul suggest that his teachings were hardly identical to those of Jesus
and his immediate Palestinian Jewish circle. Indeed, Paul’s writings
and the account of his life in the book of Acts reflect considerable
disagreement with the original followers of Jesus.
Paul’s stance toward Judaism and the Jews is both complex and
ambiguous. Modern scholars are deeply divided on the issue of
32 The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom
Paul’s views of Judaism and the Jews.6 For our purposes, it is suf-
ficient to note that Paul’s own letters and the account of his activities
in the book of Acts include elements of deep respect toward Judaism
and Jews, on the one hand, and elements of sharp disparagement,
on the other. This ambiguity, troubling to scholars seeking to clar-
ify the Pauline stance, may in fact be the most important aspect of
his teachings on Judaism and the Jews.7 Paul was surely aware of the
growing gulf between the Jewish world, in which he had been raised,
and the gentile Christianity he vigorously fostered. He was deeply
conscious of the need to differentiate the two. This differentiation
had to emphasize the truth of the gentile Christian views and the
errors of the Jews. Yet, Paul seems to have been unwilling to dismiss
the Jews entirely, recognizing their past greatness and holding out
hope for their future redemption.
With the further passage of time, the Palestinian Jewish group
declined in importance within the nascent Christian community; the
diaspora Jewish groups eventually declined as well; the gentile sub-
group came to dominate the young faith community. Here again,
there was much room for changes that would reflect a new social
grouping, a new linguistic and cultural milieu, and new forms of spir-
ituality. To be sure, much of the original message was undoubtedly
retained; at the same time, much was altered. Exactly what remained
and what was changed is the key question, to which no precise answer
has yet won – or is likely to win – a consensus of scholarly support.
What we do know is that the Gospels, on which subsequent knowl-
edge and imagery of Jesus are based, post-date the social, linguistic,
and ideational changes just now depicted. Thus, they reveal a Jesus as
perceived by later observers far removed from the original Palestinian
ambience within which Jesus himself lived and taught.
In this new gentile Christian setting, determined to maintain a
sense of continuity with the earlier and somewhat different Jesus
movement, the Jews constituted a vexing problem. On the one hand,
there was much in the new faith that involved traditional Jewish
thinking and that was deeply and inextricably bound up with the
Jesus legacy. For example, it was clear that Jesus and his followers
were Jews, that the ethical and spiritual norms of the Hebrew Bible
were central to their early vision, that miracles of biblical proportions
played a key role in their thinking, and that fulfillment of biblical
prophecy was a crucial element in the early Jesus movement. At the
same time, there was obviously much criticism of the established
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
then took the cloth which contained our provision: having spread it,
I called upon GOD to give his blessing. My comrade said, "you pray
too much, do you think that GOD takes notice of what you say?"
surely said I, because, if He did not take notice of what I said and
asked him, He would not have provided for us: well says he, "all
your nonsense will bring nothing but bad luck."
One day having some company at home, that were invited to spend
two or three weeks with us; I retired as usual after supper to bed,
and knelt down: at the time I was pouring out my soul unto GOD in
prayers, a young lady inadvertently passed by, and seeing my
chamber door half open, stepped in; and finding me in the posture
as before mentioned, she bursted into a loud laugh and rushed out
of the room, and in a few minutes I had the whole company round
me making all sorts of jests, some laughing till they fell down on the
floor, others holding their sides with laughing, and others jumping
and stamping, &c. It was indeed such a noise as I never heard
before, for it was both a tragedy, and comedy. In all that disturbance
I was as firm as a rock, and did not move from the place in which I
was, untill I had fulfilled my duty towards my SAVIOUR. I told them
it was very unmannerly to disturb me thus, in my most precious
time: for prayers were my best delight and comfort, and without
them I could not rest nor be happy. The tale soon spread in the
neighbourhood about me being a devout,[18] so that I was
persecuted daily by my own friends, but as I did not mind them,
they were soon tired, and at last were obliged to let me be quiet,
seeing they could not get master over me.
Three weeks after that scandalous scene, I was taken very ill, of the
putrid and malign fever; three days after the Doctor gave me up, for
I was so ill that he thought I could not recover.
I was ten days and nights senseless; and saw wondrous things in my
agony; and the eleventh day I came to myself again: my keeper said
to me, "I hope you have prayed enough this time?" I did not know
what she meant, but having asked her the reason why; she said, all
the time I was senseless, I did nothing else but pray night and day
untill I came to my senses again. I was a long time before I could
recover my former strength again; and as soon as I was able, I went
to my business. I then was melancholy with thinking about my
Country, and Mother; as for my Mother I did not know in what
quarter of the world she was in; notwithstanding that, I took my pen
and wrote, first, to St. Domingo, and then to two or three other
places where I thought most likely, but all was without success, for
no answer was to be had. Again I wrote, and so on for about
eighteen months without receiving the least tidings: which made me
some how think that my poor Mother was no more. I was in such a
low state of mind that my life became a burden to me, I could not
find any comfort either in amusement or prayer; and when at prayer,
I prayed not with such a delight as I used to do: so that in a short
time I quite turned my back from the path of the truly and most
blessed LORD JESUS CHRIST, and became again as wicked as ever.
One day my master called me, and said, "the Negroes are in
rebellion, and you must go to war and fight." He provided horse and
arms for me, and sent me to join the cavalry that were encamped at
a little distance from where we lived. Some days after I was at the
camp, the Captain ordered me to go into the Town to carry some
dispatches; I made some excuse, telling him to send some others;
but he said, "you are appointed to go and you must for I dare not
trust any other." I obeyed and went out of the camp, and rode to
Town which was nine or ten miles distance from the place above
mentioned; and not being able to return the same day, I waited till
morning: but what was my great surprise at the moment I was
putting my foot in the stirrup to return? an alarm was given that the
whole camp were murdered in the night,[19] except one who
escaped having on nothing but his shirt. We being the only persons
that were spared, we were put into another company, and marched
on the same day against the rebels, and were successful in all our
attempts. I was for three weeks night and day fighting, some times
wet through with rain, and at other times suffocated with the heat:
all that while, I never knew what it was to lay down or take rest;
neither having an opportunity to put clean linen on: but at last we
returned into the Town, where we took some refreshment and put
clean linen on, for we had need of it. No sooner was I refreshed, but
I was ordered to carry some letters of consequence to a camp nine
miles off; but as the road was very dangerous, I asked one of my
comrades to go with me, which he did with great pleasure; we
arrived at the camp without the least injury or danger: but it was not
with the same luck we went back, for as we were passing through a
dark Wood, (it was then between ten and eleven o'Clock at night,) a
shower of musket balls were fired at us, which unexpected noise and
hissing, so much frighted our horses, that it was impossible for us to
lead them; they rushed through brambles and briers, and at last
plunged into a dead Lake, where we had like to have been drowned;
but our horses being stout animals, they swam and gained the other
side in a few minutes. We made the best of our way through woods
and thickets to escape the fury of the balls which were continually
flying about us, and after having wandered a great while through
unpracticable places, we found again the road, and rode as fast as
we could to the Town: since that affair I have been in many
obstinate and bloody engagements.
One day as I was reading the news-paper, I heard that St. Domingo
was in a state of tranquillity; at this I was determined to go thither:
accordingly, I went on board a Ship that was going there; we went
first to St. Thomas, to take some passengers, and for my dear
Country we sailed, and arrived safe there. My first inquiry was my
Mother; I was about two days rambling through the streets without
hearing any tidings respecting her or any other relations; till at last
peradventure I met with one of my Cousins that was in France at the
time I left that Country; she took me to her house and entertained
me with loving kindnesses; and told me that my Mother was in the
Spanish part of St. Domingo, at the distance of sixty miles from the
place where I then was.
Anxious to see the author of my days, I would have set out
immediately, but she entreated me to spend a week or two with her,
to which I agreed: we related to each other our misfortunes, and
soothed each other's sorrows. Once in my conversation I was
speaking of that barbarous and pretended Uncle of mine, who used
me so ill when I was in France; I asked her whether she knew where
he was, she told me that he was in the Town, and not far from the
house; I was indeed amazed that such a wretch was still alive; she
told me also that he came some times to see her; well, said I, if he
comes I will be ready for his reception, for I am no more what I
formerly was, [a Child,] that I should dread him. Two days after, he
heard that I was in Town, and came to see me: as soon as he came
into the house, my mind was struck with horror. He advanced
towards me and asked how I did stretching forth his hand to shake
hands with me; I refused my hand and said, Sir, I do not shake
hands with people that I know not. "why (said he) don't you know
me?" no Sir! I replied: "why don't you know your Uncle S?" no Sir! I
never had any relation of that name: "why don't you remember you
lived in France with me?" no Sir! for I am sure I never saw you
before to day, if I did, my mind does not afford me the recollection
of your features: "how is it you don't remember me, who married
your Aunt V.—— in second wedlock?" "Oh! yes I do now you
execrable villain; retire from my presence, monster of iniquities;
think not that you shall go unpunished, nor escape the wrath of
GOD, for the sword of vengeance hangs over your head, and will
crush you to atoms in an unexpected time that justice may be
satisfied." He first blushed, then became pale, and without replying
left the house; and I saw him no more while I tarried there. My
Cousin was very much pleased with my reception of him; but as the
time I agreed with her was expired, I thought of going to see my
Mother; so I took leave of her and embarked in a long-boat which
was going that way: in four and twenty hours I was landed at
Moutechristo where she resided, and was not long to find out the
place of her dwelling, the Town being small. I will just let my reader
know how I made my entrance: first, I knock'd at the door; when in,
I asked her whether she knew me; she said no Sir; I asked her
again whether she had not Children abroad; she said yes, "but,
[giving a deep sigh,] all my hopes are vanished, for it is between
thirteen and fourteen years since I have seen or heard from them." I
then said to her, behold the youngest of them before you: she
exclaimed in a transport of joy, "Oh! my Son is it you? my dear H.
—— is still existing?" and then fainted: but was not long in that
state, for her exceeding joy soon called her to her senses again. My
hard heart was melted in an instant; I could no longer withstand
that filial love; I threw myself into those arms which were so
desirous and eager to welcome me to that breast which was so
ardently panting for me: our joy was so great on both sides, that
neither of us could utter a word. Our language was only by sighs:
and those precious tears which bedewed my face when I first parted
with her, were once more mixed with mine. Our arms interwove in
each other as an emblem of the most affecting tenderness. In that
posture we remained a long time, so much were our feelings
affected, that we could not utter a single word.
Some time afterwards, she shewed me my little Brother and Sister,
by her second husband; and dispatched my Brother to go and fetch
my Father-in-law who was then at the farm, a little distance from the
Town. In the mean time she said to me; "your Father-in-law is an
honest man? he is not like many others, but he is a true Father that
I have met with for you;" she then asked me where my Brothers
were; I told her they were taken prisoners by the English and
conveyed to England: at the same time my Father-in-law came into
the house, which interrupted our conversation. He seemed to be
very joyful of my arrival, and treated me with the greatest kindness.
This was the happiest moment I ever enjoyed, being in the bosom of
my friends. But all this happiness did not last long, for the Negroes
rose up again, and killed every white man that fell into their hands.
I was then compelled to stand in my own defence, as a foot soldier;
every night, alarms were given, for the blacks were at the gates of
the Town: but having received reinforcement, they were repulsed.
Afterwards I was sent to garrison, fifteen miles off, where I stay'd
four and twenty days; at my return my little Brother fell sick of the
fever, and died in two days after; which put my Mother and Father-
in-law in such distress of mind, that I thought they would have
followed, especially my Father-in-law, for he was a man of very
tender feelings: but by degrees and length of time, their griefs were
dispersed.
I was for several days in a such distressed state of mind, that I had
not courage enough to go out; for I thought every body knew what
was the matter with me; and to appease my wounded conscience, I
thought that a reformation would have been sufficient to justify me
in the sight of GOD: so that I began to build, as it is said upon a
sandy foundation, by performing a few formal duties; thinking that
by my good works, I should merit the favours of GOD so as to
forgive me all my trespasses. The plan I had formed was this:
having a Roman Catholic prayer book, I thought it was all-sufficient
to calm my troubled breast, and to bring me to a perfect state of
happiness. So every night and morning I used to kneel down, and
taking the prayer book I read the morning and evening prayer; this
performance I thought would please GOD, and get me from under
the terrors of an accused conscience: but in all these vain duties I
never looked to JESUS for forgiveness or remission of sins, neither to
his precious and cleansing blood, nor could I perceive the depravity
of my corrupted nature: but I depended wholly upon my best
endeavours and good works. I continued but a little time in doing
those erroneous duties, and felt insensibly at last that all my fears
were vanished away; I was like the dog, returning to his vomit
again: for I begun the same method as before, keeping all sorts of
bad company, and breaking the sabbath with drinking, swearing and
fighting &c. I was at the least five days drunk in the week, and
always quarrelling.
One day in one of my mad fits, (though I was not drunk,) I resolved
to delay no longer to put an end to my miserable existence; for that
purpose I went into a garden near by: the same instrument that had
been lifted up before, was again employed; I was in such great
despair, that I was relentless towards my own life and happiness; so
that I lifted up my sanguinary hand and struck my left breast
twice[22].—I fell down senseless; some persons who were near,
hearing the exclamation I made, which was, Oh! Mother, I shall
never see thee again! came to see what was the matter; and to their
great surprise, found me wallowing in my own blood. They carried
me into my room for dead, and some person went to fetch the
Doctor. As soon as the Doctor saw my wounds, which were through
my lungs, he said, I can be of no use to him, for he has not ten
minutes to live; but if he does, I may be of service to him: and went
away. But he was soon fetched back again for I was not dead. When
he came the second time, he gave me something to drink which
recalled me to my senses: my inside being full of blood, he thought
it would be proper to bleed me, it might ease me a little, for I could
hardly breathe. After I was bled I fell into a swoon; the Doctor then
said, if he lives till one o'Clock it will be a wonder. Some-body went
to fetch a Catholic Minister[23], who lived in the same Town; when he
saw me, he told me to recommend my soul to GOD, saying, that I
had but a few minutes to live: and after this short exhortation he
went out of the room, saying, it was too much for him to see.
I was restless all the night, for I could not sleep on account of the
soreness of my wounds. When morning came I was so weak and so
feverish, that the Doctor thought I could not live to see the sun set.
Night came, and yet alive: but I was so tormented with ideas as
before mentioned, that I durst not shut my eyes for fear I should
awake in Hell. I was three nights without taking the least rest; for I
was afraid to fall asleep, as I made it a sure thing in my mind, that if
I fell asleep, I should awake no more. I felt myself in such a
miserable condition, that I thought GOD would never forgive me. All
the time I was in bed, I lay upon thorns as it were; for I was so filled
with grief and sorrow, occasioned by my misbehaviour towards the
everlasting being, that my life was quite miserable.
The week before Good Friday I was taken ill, and was obliged to
keep my bed several days. In the mean time I prayed unto GOD to
give me health and strength, that I might be able to go and hear his
word that precious day he bought my Salvation; but it was not
permitted; for that very day I was extremely ill, and wept bitterly
because I could not go to SION my happy place. So I called for a
new Testament that I might read a chapter or two; but I was so
weak, that I could not read; and was forced to put the book down.
In the afternoon I felt myself a little better, and took the book I read
a chapter, by which I received some comfort.
I was very patient under my afflictions, for the more I was afflicted,
the more my mind was comforted; I did not fear the sting of Death
at all, because, I had faith to believe I should be happy. In a few
weeks I was entirely recovered, and the LORD soon after blessed me
with the Spirit of prayer, so that I could join my friends in CHRIST in
their labours.
Now I am fully convinced that I am found, and brought back to the
flock of whom JESUS CHRIST is the Shepherd: and I will adore and
praise him for what He has done for me through Grace, and trust in
Him for what He has promised to do.
"O! most blessed JESUS, thou who hast been pleased to protect me
through so many dangers, and watched over me ever since my
youthful days; be pleased I beseech thee, to keep me now that I am
found: I did not find myself, thou knowest; but it was thou, O! most
blessed JESUS who found me when lost and ready to sink into the
valley of destruction. Thou hast brought me from thousands of miles
to shew me thy light divine, and to make me a prisoner of hope
instead of a prisoner of war. O! Eternal THREE in ONE, look down on
thine unworthy servant, and water his Soul with the dew of thy
Heavenly Grace, that he may be prepared to receive that never
fading Crown, which is at the end of the race thou hast enabled him
to run: and help him to renounce all other works but thine. Now I
forsake all the riches and pleasures of this world, for the Eternal life
which was purchased by the precious Blood of thy dear Son JESUS:
to which I beseech thee, to keep me now, and to the end." AMEN.
THE
WEST INDIAN HYMN.
"This my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost and is
found."
PRODIGAL'S FATHER.
Now though six thousand miles from home,
Yet nearer to my GOD I come
'Twas JESUS' love that set me free,
And brought me back by grace to thee,
And JESUS will lead me to see;
Eternal days.
[2]
Remember, that GOD makes us sensible that we are
sinners.
[3]
Behold, He taketh away, who can hinder him? who will
say unto him, what doest thou? Job. chap. 9. ver. 12.
[4]
Being Persued by the Negroes, and as he was escaping
over an hedge, his Horse alighted; where the
Barbarous Negroes cut him in small pieces with their
Swords.
[5]
Alluding to the French Revolution.
[6]
This was the first time I ever dar'd to contend with
him, but the remembrance of my Father and former
state rose in me such a violent spirit, that I spoke to
him with such a Gloomy tone of voice, that all those
that were present could not help but pity my situation.
[7]
No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper.
Isaiah chap. 54. ver. 17.
[8]
This passenger was a Captain which understood the
Navigable part of the river.
[9]
Called in Sea terms a Cabin.
[10]
Though we did not come from that place, we applyed
the untruth as you see above, only that we might
deceive them and pass for an English Ship; for our
Ship was a great deal less then theirs: besides that we
were much damaged, both by the Sea, and by
Fighting.
[11]
They were come from Demerara themselves, and they
knew that there was no Ship of war in that Harbour.
We heard after that the name of the Ship was the
Pelican, and carried eighteen Guns of nine Pounders,
which were a great advantage over us, who carried but
twelve Guns of four Pounders.
[12]
This is a real Mariners principle.
[13]
In famine he shall Redeem thee from Death. Job chap.
5. ver. 20.
[14]
He shall deliver thee in six troubles; yea, in seven there
shall no evil touch thee. In famine He shall Redeem
thee from Death; and in war from the power of the
sword. Job chap. 5. ver. 19 & 20.
[15]
She kept a linen drapery shop where he boarded and
lodg'd.
[16]
A Gold coin worth thirty-six shillings.
[17]
It was a forged one as I heard after, as the Doctor did
not charge any thing for his trouble.
[18]
In England, if any profess Christianity, he is called a
methodist, and in France or any other dominions
appertaining to the same, a Devout.
[19]
Oh! reader consider and meditate? see how GOD was
pleased to spare such a rebellious Creature as I; and
how Divine Providence distinguished itself by calling
me alone, though I, with obstinacy refused to comply
to its orders: but who can resist the power of the
LORD when he says, I will and they shall. &c. "Oh!
bless the LORD O my soul, and all that is within me,
bless his holy name: for the LORD has done wondrous
things. He has lifted me up, and has not made my foes
to rejoice over me."
[20]
May it please GOD to enrol them in the Royal Regiment
of Saints, commanded by his most truly and Honorable
Son, the LORD JESUS CHRIST.
[21]
When thou passest through the waters, I will be with
thee. Isaiah. chap. 43, ver. 2.
[22]
I have sinned: what shall I do unto thee, O thou
preserver of men? why hast thou set me as a mark
against thee, so that I am a burden to myself. Job,
chap. 7. ver. 20.
[23]
I did not know for what purpose they went for him;
but I supposed it was to administer unto me the
Extreme-Unction; for as it is reported among the
Roman Catholic that a man or woman dying without
having received the Extreme-Unction, (which they call
a Sacrament,) must either go to Hell, or in Purgatory.
[24]
Though I had had a taste and a view of the love of
GOD, (as you may read in the former part of my life,)
and a great desire to serve and worship him; yet I did
not feel the corruption of my fallen nature, neither the
great weight and burden of my inveterate sins and
transgressions: I was far from thinking of the
inestimable worth and want of a precious SAVIOUR. I
had a zeal, but not according to knowledge; I was like
that sect which the Apostle Paul speaks of in the tenth
chapter of Romans and the third verse: for they, being
ignorant of GOD's Righteousness, and going about to
establish their own Righteousness, have not submitted
themselves unto the Righteousness of GOD.
[25]
the Reverend Samuel Franklin, of Ebley in
Gloucestershire, Minister in Lady Huntingdon's
connection, then at Ashbourn in Derbyshire.
[26]
My friends scorn me; but mine eye poureth out tears
unto GOD. Job, chap. 16, ver. 20.
[27]
SION Chapel.
Transcriber's Note:
Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note.
Irregularities and inconsistencies in the text have been
retained as printed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must,
at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy,
a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy
upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive
from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
ebookbell.com