Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry For Biotechnologists 1st Edition Munishwar Nath Gupta (Editor) Download
Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry For Biotechnologists 1st Edition Munishwar Nath Gupta (Editor) Download
https://ebookmeta.com/product/some-key-topics-in-chemistry-and-
biochemistry-for-biotechnologists-1st-edition-munishwar-nath-
gupta-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/some-unusual-topics-in-quantum-
mechanics-2nd-edition-pankaj-sharan/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/multiple-choice-questions-in-
biochemistry-3rd-edition-r-c-gupta/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/phenolic-antioxidants-in-foods-
chemistry-biochemistry-and-analysis-1st-edition-alam-zeb/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/earlys-physical-dysfunction-
practice-skills-for-the-occupational-therapy-assistant-4th-
edition-mary-elizabeth-patnaude/
Imaging and Technology in Urology Sotonye Tolofari
(Editor)
https://ebookmeta.com/product/imaging-and-technology-in-urology-
sotonye-tolofari-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/operations-management-and-data-
analytics-modelling-economic-crises-perspective-1st-edition-
lalit-kumar-awasthi-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/melting-the-frost-troll-monster-
between-the-sheets-season-2-1st-edition-ella-maven/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/seduced-by-the-mountain-man-a-
mountain-man-curvy-woman-short-instalove-romance-men-of-big-horn-
ridge-book-4-1st-edition-carly-keene/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/foreign-direct-investments-
concepts-methodologies-tools-and-applications-1st-edition-
mehdikhosrow-pour-ed/
Cottonmouth Creek Ben Nussbaum
https://ebookmeta.com/product/cottonmouth-creek-ben-nussbaum/
Some Key Topics in Chemistry
and Biochemistry for
Biotechnologists
Editor
Munishwar Nath Gupta
Former Emeritus Professor
Department of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
New Delhi, India
p,
p,
A SCIENCE PUBLISHERS BOOK
A SCIENCE PUBLISHERS BOOK
Cover credit: Image taken from Chapter 4 of this book. Reproduced by kind courtesy of authors of
the chapter.
Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and
publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of
their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material
reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this
form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and
let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced,
transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or
hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information
storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, access
www.copyright.com or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive,
Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. For works that are not available on CCC please contact
[email protected]
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are
used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Covid-19 brought out some fault lines in our preparation for a crisis which needed
coordinated efforts from scientists and technologists belonging to different disciplines.
Lately, there has been a debate about the relative values of a specialist versus a
generalist. The experience with Covid-19 perhaps teaches us that it is best to have
specialists who are also reasonably familiar with basic concepts of other disciplines
which have interfaces with their own special subject. It is in line with this thinking
that engineers and doctors are taught chemical sciences at an undergraduate level. As
science and technology grows, it is becoming increasingly difficult to optimise this
exposure. Not everything is covered in standard text books. The present volume is
an effort to bring together some topics which are generally not covered adequately
in the books/syllabi of undergraduate or even post graduate courses. The idea is
to encourage scientists/technologists to read more widely. That would enable these
persons to deal more effectively with such crisis by rounding off their knowledge in
some basic areas in chemical and biochemical sciences.
Chapter 1 covers flow-based systems which are increasingly becoming important
in both chemical and biological sciences. Biologists would profit from learning
how rates of biocatalytic reactions are monitored in such systems. Chapters 2 and 3
describe chemiproteomics and high throughput screening methods. Both topics are
valuable in the context of drug discovery/design.
Enzymes function in many different milieu. Among such non-conventional
media, solid-gas biphasic medium is perhaps most under appreciated. Gases like
hydrogen sulphide and nitric oxide are now known to be metabolic intermediates of
high biological significance. Hence the choice of the topic of Chapter 4 as solid-gas
biocatalysis. Biocatalysis in non-conventional media and at high temperatures needs
enzymes with high stability. More robust enzymes derived from salty environments
(marine resources being the most important one) are described in Chapters 5 and 6.
Nanosciences/nanotechnology is now relevant to many area of biotechnology
and medicine. Quantum dots, extremely small nanoparticles have some fascinating
properties. Among these is their value as fluorescent materials. Chapter 7 discusses
these nanoparticles. While most reviews focus on their applications; this chapter
highlights synthesis. This may enable one to design and tailor QDs for specific
applications. While chirality of organic molecules is generally a familiar topic among
chemists; chirality of nanomaterials is not so well known. Chapter 8 deals with this
somewhat obscure topic.
iv Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
Preface iii
1. Uses of Flow-based Systems for Enzyme Kinetics 1
Supaporn Kradtap Hartwell
2. Chemoproteomics: An Extremely Powerful Kit in Drug Discovery 26
Toolbox
Anupama Binoy, Revathy Sahadevan and Sushabhan Sadhukhan
3. Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening Methods 44
Vaishnavi Puppala, Shivcharan Prasad and Ipsita Roy
4. Fundamentals and Applications of Solid/Gas Biocatalysis 64
Sergio Huerta‑Ochoa, Carlos Omar Castillo‑Araiza,
Itza Nallely Cordero‑Soto, Yahir Alejandro Cruz‑Martínez,
Lilia Arely Prado‑Barragán and Olga Miriam Rutiaga Quiñones
5. Biochemistry and Biomolecules of Halophiles: Recent Trends 91
and Prospects
Sumit Kumar, Bibhuti Bhusan Das, Nitin Srivastava and Sunil Kumar Khare
6. Marine Enzymes: Exploiting Bacterial Resource for 117
Blue Biotechnology
Yasmin Khambhaty
7. Quantum Dots in Biological Sciences 152
Kamla Rawat and Himadri B. Bohidar
8. Chirality in Nanomaterials: Occurrence, Methods of 177
Determination and Biochemical Significance
Wells Utembe
9. Surface Chemistry and Immunochemistry at a Crossroad 191
called COVID-19
Munishwar Nath Gupta
Index 215
Chapter 1
Uses of Flow-based Systems
for Enzyme Kinetics
Supaporn Kradtap Hartwell
Introduction
Enzymes are proteins that accelerate chemical reactions upon binding to a specific
reagent called a substrate. Enzymes have been incorporated in numerous chemical
and biochemical analyses and biotechnological processes to catalyze the target
reactions. The shape and properties of the binding sites on the enzyme, arisen from
the unique amino acids sequence, is complimentarily specific for a certain substrate
and is conventionally known as a Lock and Key fit. The induced fit model further
explains that a binding site on an enzyme is not rigid and can adjust its shape to
better accommodate a substrate molecule (Koshland 1958, Boyer 2022, Vasella
et al. 2022). Some enzymes facilitate bond breaking and transition state formation by
physically altering the substrate molecules (Garcia-Viloca et al. 2004). Even though
some enzymes may form chemical bonds with the substrate during the reaction,
these bonds are temporary and active sites will return to normal after releasing the
products. In other words, an enzyme catalyzes a chemical reaction without itself
being altered, and therefore, can resume its function after removal of products.
Figure 1 shows the reversible binding of enzyme-substrate, followed by the releasing
of products and freeing of enzyme. Thus, apart from having high selectivity, enzymes
have signal amplification ability by continuously reacting the released enzyme with
more incoming substrate molecules. This helps to increase the number of products
and promote sensitivity, which is beneficial when using enzymatic reaction as part
of a chemical detection process such as in enzyme-based immunoassay techniques
(Calabria et al. 2021). In addition, the fact that enzyme molecules can resume their
Department of Chemistry, 3800 Victory Parkway, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA 45207.
Email: [email protected]
2 Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
Enzyme kinetic assays are generally carried out batch-wise by mixing enzyme at a
constant concentration with a substrate at various concentrations in several cuvettes.
The initial rates (velocity V) of the individual reactions are observed for a period of
time, e.g., measurement of products in a spectrophotometer for a set period of time
such as a few seconds or a few minutes; V = d[P]/dt. Initial rate is preferred because
it is easiest to observe the rate of reaction when the reaction is just started without
the effect of accumulated products that slow down the reaction. At low substrate
concentration ([S] << Km), the reaction is first order with respect to substrate as
rate of the reaction is directly proportional to the concentration of substrate. At high
substrate concentration ([S] >> Km) where it is assumed to be a constant parameter
in the rate law, the reaction is assumed zero order with respect to substrate as rate
of the reaction is at maximum and independent of substrate concentration (Atkins
and de Paula 2017). Figure 2 shows three common plots used for determination of
the important kinetic parameters Km and Vmax of an enzyme. Plot of V vs [S] is non-
linear. Transformation of the curve to linear graph, either by plotting 1/V vs 1/[S] as
proposed by Lineweaver and Burk, or V vs V/[S] as proposed by Eddie and Hofstee,
makes it easier to estimate Km and Vmax from slope and XY intercepts.
Apart from physical conditions such as temperature, pH, and ionic strength, the
presence of enzyme inhibitors can alter Vmax or Km of the enzyme. Inhibitors may
be in the form of small organic molecules or small peptide analog of the natural
substrate. Table 1 summarizes common types of inhibitors and their effects on
kinetic parameters of an enzyme (Kuddas 2019, Strelow et al. 2012). Nevertheless,
inhibitors can be used as tools to validate purity of an enzyme. A detailed discussion
on this is beyond the scope of this chapter but is available elsewhere (Scott and
Williams 2012).
As mentioned, enzyme kinetic assays usually involve mixing enzyme at a
constant concentration with various concentrations of substrate. When performed
manually, the process can be tedious and slow. The commonly used 96 well-plate
does not always answer the demand for high throughput analysis (Pereira et al. 2020),
for example to evaluate sources of enzyme, and drug discovery. Limitations of the
common 96 well-plate include insufficient space to accommodate the experiments
that involve many different conditions to be studied. It also requires relatively large
volumes of reagents, is not portable nor fully automated, and still requires well trained
Table 1. Common types of inhibitors and their effects on Vmax and Km.
and, in many cases, amount of chemicals. The flow injection technique involves
introducing a plug of a chemical reagent, usually via an injection valve, into a
flowing stream of another reagent that is forced into a small tubing by pumping.
Chemical reaction takes place while the reagents are merging and flowing down-
stream. Product is detected when the reaction plug flows through the detector.
For studying enzyme kinetics, volumes of enzyme/substrate and degree of mixing
can be optimized by controlling flow rates. Detection of product or substrate
concentration, especially at non-equilibrium state, can be done rapidly and at a
more precise time for each replicate, as compared to the batch method. The process
becomes more automatic and helps to minimize inconsistency owing to manual
operations. This is especially useful in measuring initial rate that is often hard to
do precisely in batch mode due to the difficulty in conducting prompt and precise
solution transferring, mixing, and maneuvering cuvettes. The ability to measure
initial rate is attractive because concentration of the main substrate of interest is
still abundant at the beginning of enzymatic reaction. Therefore, it can suppress
interferences from other lower concentration substrates that may become pronounced
as the reaction progresses and the concentration of the main substrate is depleted.
Also, as the product concentration[s] are low, product inhibition does not complicate
the situation.
Conventional flow injection analysis (FIA) systems for enzyme kinetics have
been reviewed (Hartwell and Grudpan 2012). A typical flow injection system,
composed of peristaltic pump, a 6-port injection valve, tubing, and detector, can
easily be operated at milliliter level. Volume of sample/reagent is dictated by
the size of the injection loop connected to the ports on the valve, see Fig. 3a. In
loading position, the injected solution fills the loop of a selected size/volume and
excess amount goes to waste. In injection position, the valve is switched to let the
carrier solution push out the injected solution inside the loop and mix with it while
travelling through the detector. In enzyme kinetics, enzyme may be injected into
the flowing substrate carrier solution or vice versa, depending on cost of reagents
and experimental design. Due to the continuous flow in one direction, it is more
convenient to use enzyme solution at constant concentration as a carrier, and inject a
substrate of various concentrations. However, high consumption of enzyme solution
can increase analysis cost.
A more modern sequential injection analysis (SIA) system with a computer
controlled syringe pump can perform chemical analysis at lower volume at microliter
level. The flow control is not continuous, instead direction and movement of liquid
is programmed based on volume and flow rate selection. Another main component
of the SIA system is a selection valve for aspiration and dispensing of all the
solutions. Flow reversal of the syringe pump controlled by a computer software
which allows multiple solutions as well as air segments to be introduced as stacked
zones into a long holding coil located between the syringe pump and the selection
valve, see Fig. 3b. In enzyme kinetics, aliquots of enzyme, substrate, and co-
factor solutions are aspirated one at a time through different ports on the selection
valve into a holding coil. The sequence of aspiration should be optimized to allow
6 Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
Figure 3. Diagrams and operation of a) 6-port injection valve used in FIA, and b) multi-port selection
valve used in SIA. R1, R2, R3 are reagents such as enzyme, substrate, and co-factor.
introduction is important for designing the analysis. Consider Fig. 3 for comparison
of operational principles of the FIA 6-port injection valve and the SIA 8-port selection
valve, as described above, for better understanding of flow direction manipulation
and accommodation.
A review on applications of SIA for enzyme kinetics include various examples of
research (van Staden and Raluca 2002, Silvestre et al. 2011), mainly in homogenous
phase where enzyme is in solution (non-immobilized enzyme). Incorporation of the
mixing chamber to one of the ports on the selection valve is most common in order
to promote mixing by increasing radial movement that may be insufficient in the
holding coil alone. Detection, then, can be done directly on the mixing chamber
(e.g., using fiber optics), or by sending an aliquot of product solution from the chamber
to the detector unit. Lab-on-Valve (LOV) and Lab-at-Valve (LAV) commonly used
with the SIA system are ways to incorporate the detection unit within or closely
adjacent to a multi-position selection valve, in order to enable higher throughput
analysis and lower volume consumption of reagents (from hundreds to tenths of
microliter). The low dead volume in the SIA system allows for faster analysis
because the new portion of solution can be sent to the detection at the same time
that the previous portion in the detector is pushed out. While the most common
detector used for the LOV system is fiber optics which can fit within the channel
specially made for it located as part of the selection valve, other devices such as
mixing chamber, filtration unit, and dialysis unit can also be incorporated around the
valve which are usually referred to as LAV. Schematic representations of basic FIA,
SIA, SIA-LOV, and SIA-LAV systems are depicted in Fig. 4. Please note that figures
shown are common conventional flow based systems. Implementation of other types
of valves such as a solenoid valve to perform hydrodynamic injection is also possible
(Khongpet et al. 2018).
Figure 4. Common flow based systems a) FIA using a peristaltic pump and 6-port injection valve, b) SIA
using a syringe pump and 8-port injection valve, c) SIA-LOV where the detector is integrated onto the
selection valve, d) SIA-LAV where the detector is adjacent to the selection valve.
8 Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
In general the flow of solution in the FIA system is continuous, while the flow
of solution in the SIA system is stop and go due to reversed flow operation of the
syringe pump. However, both FIA and SIA systems can be designed and adapted to
manipulate various other solution flow formats (such as continuous flow, stopped
flow, segmented flow, and quenched flow) to serve particular applications. Briefly,
continuous flow systems are based on mixing of the merged sample and reagent
solutions injected into the continuous flow of the carrier solution. In order to allow
more reaction time between enzyme and substrate, and hence increased sensitivity,
stopped flow format can be used in which the reaction zone is physically stopped
for a period of time. This is done by stopping the pump, before online detection.
This is similar but is not the same as quenched flow where the reaction zone is
stopped both physically and chemically by stopping the pump and introducing a
quenching solution. In this case, a typical FIA system with a single 6-port injection
valve and one direction flow has limitation due to number of solutions that can be
injected being limited to one. An additional valve or a pump is needed to introduce
a quencher. The 8-port selection valve with capability of reverse flow enables
introduction of more solutions using a single valve. The stopped flow technique can
be used to detect intermediates, while the quenched flow technique is mostly limited
for detection of product. The two techniques can be used complementarily (Fisher
2005). In the FIA and SIA systems, band broadening and dispersion of the sample/
reagent zone that occur at the interfaces with the carrier stream may cause dilution
and low sensitivity of detection. However, the systems can introduce air segments
before and after each reaction zone to prevent mixing/minimize dispersion, which in
turn improves sensitivity and reduces consumption of reagents (Patton and Crouch
1986).
Microfluidics
Due to the great demand for high throughput analysis along with the need for low
volume consumption of chemical/biological reagents, downscaling the analysis
system has been a major focus. Study of enzyme, in particular, requires numerous
observations of the catalytic capability of the enzyme under various conditions of
enzyme-substrate reactions which is time consuming, labor intensive, and can be
expensive due to high total volume of reagents. The progress in downscaling of the
chemical analysis system has been gearing toward a small portable unit known as
lab-on-chip or microfluidic systems.
Microfluidic devices are usually composed of a network of microchannels of
the size in the range of sub-millimeters engraved on a solid material such as glass
or plastic that can accommodate the chemical reaction in the volume of microliter
or lower. Although in some applications, top-open channels can be used (Casavant
2013), the microchannels are usually closed with another solid plate that is secured
to the plate with engraved microchannels using such physical and chemical methods
as double sided tape, magnetic clamps, or plasma treatment (Tkachenko et al. 2009,
Tsao and DeVoe 2009, Khongpet et al. 2020).
Uses of Flow‑based Systems for Enzyme Kinetics 9
Figure 5. Laminar flow in a microchannel where there is a) a pressure driven parabolic gradient flow
profile in which the direction of flow is due to the pressure pump, and b) an electroosmotic driven plug
flow profile in which the direction of flow is due to the movement of a layer of adsorbed ions toward the
oppositely charged electrode.
10 Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
Figure 6. An example of microfluidic system with some common microchannel designs (modified from
Siegesmund and Hartwell 2018, Ellerhorst and Hartwell 2019).
Figure 7. Different kinetic conditions a) intrinsic kinetics in homogeneous phase with no concentration
gradient and no rotational nor diffusional limitation. b) an open large pore size relative to the size of
substrate (P > W) yields inherent kinetics with no concentration gradient, and no rotational nor diffusion
limitation c) an open small pore size relative to the size of substrate (P < W) yields rotational masked
inherent kinetics d) a closed end large pore size relative to the size of substrate (P > W) yields diffusional
masked inherent kinetics e) a closed end small pore size relative to the size of substrate (P < W) yields
diffusional and rotational masked inherent kinetics. P is pore diameter. W is size of substrate molecule. S
is substrate. E is enzyme. X shown on dotted arrows indicates the binding that cannot happen.
show the need of suitable geometry and pore size large enough for free rotation of
substrate molecules in order to prevent concentration gradient, and rotational and
diffusional masking.
To improve the efficiency of the packed-bed column, a single piece of monolith
material has been used in place of small beads (He et al. 2010). Monolith material
contains interconnected pore network that allows a more free flow of solution, with
lower back pressure and better mass transfer. One last point to ponder when using
immobilized enzyme reactor for kinetic study, reusing of enzyme may be affected
by memory effect that causes deactivation or interferences from the previous
run. Therefore, cleaning prior to the next analysis cycle is important to take care
of the interferences due to the presence of unreacted substrate/product, etc., from
the previous run. As the enzyme is generally used in excess, effect due to partial
deactivation is generally insignificant.
or substrate can better ensure accuracy and precision of the kinetic measurements.
Although many varieties of microchannel designs are possible, depending on
the particular application, all usually incorporate some common inlet designs for
generating droplets, namely the two inlets Y- and T-junctions, and the three inlets
flow focusing in either cross junction or co-flow formats, see Fig. 8. Please note that
the dispersed phase may be originating from two or more reagents (e.g., enzyme
and substrate) merged together before intersecting with the continuous phase. The
components in the dispersed phase may not completely mix when forming a droplet.
The single shading shown in Fig. 8 is for simplicity in presentation, not necessarily
representing a homogeneous mixture. For a complete reaction, various ways of
droplet operations such as fusion, fission, and merging can be done as reviewed by
Sohrabi et al. (2020).
The Y- and T-junctions, Figs. 8a and 8b, are popular due to the simplicity of the
designs and fabrication. The critical region is the junction where the dispersed phase
is pinched off due to the pressure and the stress applied when intersecting with the
continuous phase. Droplet size, shape, and frequency of production can be varied
by changing the geometry of the channel, i.e., height to width ratio of the channels
(Wehking et al. 2014, Garstecki et al. 2006). Steegmans et al. (2009a, 2009b, and
2010) explained that droplet formation and detachment at a Y-junction occurs in one
step by shear force between the two phases. In contrast, the process is two steps in
T-junction configuration, where a droplet is formed by inertial forces of the dispersed
phase before being detached by the dominant pressure of the continuous phase that
overcomes the interfacial tension of the dispersed phase. Ushikubo et al. (2014)
also found that droplet size depends mainly on viscosity and relative velocity of
the two liquid phases, while interfacial forces is insignificant. They compared the
Y- and T-junction performances on droplet production and found that the Y-junction
is suitable for the high viscous continuous phase fluids, while T-junction is more
feasible as it can be used with all types of fluids. T-junction is also reported to offer
14 Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
more uniform size droplets and its performance does not depend much on conditions
such as velocity or flow rate.
In the flow-focusing configuration, unlike the Y- and T-junctions, shear force
exerted by the continuous phase on the dispersed phase is symmetrical. Therefore,
the generated droplets by the flow-focusing method are rather stable. The angle at
the junction affects the hydrodynamic force in and around the region and changes
characteristics of the droplets (Yu et al. 2019). In the cross junction design,
Fig. 8c, the continuous phase flows in and focuses on the dispersed phase equally
from both sides. The sum of vectors results in the droplet flowing forward. Another
flow-focusing design, Fig. 8d, employs a narrow tubing (e.g., capillary) as a sub-
channel to force the dispersed phase into the continuous phase flowing inside the main
channel. Initially, the flows of both phases are parallel. The pressure increases at the
narrow orifice and it overcomes surface tension of the dispersed phase, subsequently
forcing droplets to form and detach (Nooranidoost et al. 2016). Physical parameters,
e.g., droplet size and dispersion, impact directly the quality of the analysis results,
e.g., throughput, dynamic working range, and accuracy (Rosenfeld et al. 2014). It
has been demonstrated that the droplet size is directly related to orifice width and
the distance of the orifice from the inlet, while it conversely relates to the orifice
length up to a certain limit (Gupta et al. 2014). Apart from the sizes of the channels
and orifice, the sizes of the droplets can be controlled by changing the flow rate
of the continuous phase. It was found that droplet size is decreased by increasing
flow rate of the continuous phase, or by using a lower ratio of dispersed flow rate to
continuous flow rate (Nooranidoost and Kuma 2019).
Droplet-based microfluidics has become an attractive method for small volume
enzyme kinetics because of important benefits including rapidity, biocompatible
interfacial chemistry, and a dispersion-free system. Enzyme kinetics in the droplet-
based platform can be carried out, for example, by introducing enzyme and substrate
as a combined small volume into a continuous flow of the carrier fluid. Immiscibility
of the droplets in the carrier helps to minimize dispersion and helps to retain
enzymatic reagents within the droplet. Adsorption of enzyme and substrate onto
the wall of the microchannel is also minimized. The mixing of content within the
droplet (e.g., enzyme and substrate) occurs through diffusion, and can be enhanced
with chaotic advection by using a winding microchannel such as serpentine design
(e.g., downstream portion of Fig. 6) to promote stretch and fold movement of the
liquid mixture (Song et al. 2006). The immiscible carrier fluid should be chosen
so as to prevent side reactions as well as dispersion or partitioning of the enzyme-
substrate products from the droplet. Aqueous phase enzyme-substrate droplets are
usually carried through the microfluidic system with a surfactant or oil based liquid.
Surfactants in the carrier fluid can help to lower the surface tension and adsorption
at the liquid-liquid interface between the dispersed and the carrier phases (Dickinson
1991).
Ochoa et al. (2020) described a step-by-step procedure to design and fabricate
a microfluidic chip for enzyme inhibition assay based on microfluidic droplets and
using fluorescent image analysis. Some examples are included here to demonstrate
Uses of Flow‑based Systems for Enzyme Kinetics 15
how the droplet-based microfluidics system can mimic the batch-wise enzyme
kinetics study such as those carried out in a micro-well plate. Song et al. (2006)
also suggested that such systems as “preformed cartridge,” proposed by Zheng and
Ismagilov (2005), may be applied to identify the enzyme of a desired reactivity. In
this application, droplets (plugs) of various enzymes in the preformed cartridge, flow
and merge with a stream of a common substrate at a T-junction. The system should,
therefore, be applicable to study the kinetic of a particular enzyme. For example, the
preformed cartridge can be employed to contain a substrate of various concentrations
which is then merged with a constant concentration stream of an enzyme.
On-chip dilution has also been reported for creating different concentrations
of reagents. Song and Ismagilov (2003) utilized a three-inlet and flow of buffer in
between two reagents (e.g., enzyme and substrate) to prevent direct mixing while
varying the amount of reagents by controlling their flow rates. Later, Bui et al. (2011)
proposed an on-chip dilution based on diffusive mixing. A Y-junction is utilized
to produce laminar parallel flows of substrate and buffer solutions. Concentration
gradients of substrate were created through diffusive mixing while the two solutions
are flowing in parallel downstream, similar to the phenomenon shown in Fig. 6. The
gradient along the liquid flows can be in linear, parabolic, or exponential fashion,
depending on the concentration of the substrate, flow rate, viscosity, and channel
length (Jeon et al. 2000). In Bui’s work, the substrate linear gradient was merged with
a constant concentration enzyme before entering the T-junction where droplets of
enzyme-substrate were produced when intersecting with the immiscible continuous
phase of oil solution. Due to the concentration gradient of the substrate, each droplet
contains different substrate concentrations. Utilizing a multiple serpentine design to
accommodate numerous droplets, a high throughput analysis of various enzymatic
conditions can be carried out within a small device. Other methods for inducing
concentration gradients have been reported, but diffusive mixing with laminar flow
is the simplest and most stable.
Another example, by Jebrail and Wheeler (2010), demonstrates the use of
electroosmotic flow to control the droplets. Electrical potentials are applied to
an array of electrodes to control the mixing and movement of the droplets. The
proposed microfluidics include both two plate format where liquid and droplets
are accommodated in a closed microchannel, and one plate format where droplets
are placed on the open channel. A hydrophobic insulator coated onto the electrodes
isolated the droplets from direct contact with the electrode surfaces. Electrical charge
was created on either side of the insulator when electrical potential was applied to the
electrodes. These charges make it possible to manipulate liquid droplets to enter and
leave the system, as well as to merge, mix, and split them as desired.
The applications of the droplet-based microfluidics have also been expanded
to include encapsulation of rare cells or a single cell, e.g., bacteria, and DNA. This
technological progress allows for the detection of a single enzymatic event and the
screening of cells for a particular enzyme activity, which enables study of evolution
of cells (Agresti et al. 2010), e.g., evaluation of the activity of enzyme expressed
after repetitive cell mutation. Droplet fusion techniques (Joensson and Svahn 2012)
16 Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
can be very useful in adding enzyme, substrate, or other necessary reagents to the
existing droplets that contain cells. Due to the large surface area to volume ratio
of the micro-droplets, characteristics of the interface between the droplet’s surface
and the continuous phase (water/oil) may have great influence on the content inside
the droplet. Therefore, compositions of aqueous and oil phases should be selected
so as to minimize adverse phenomenon, e.g., nonspecific protein adsorption at the
interface which can interfere with the enzymatic assay (Roach et al. 2005).
Detection
Image analysis based on fluorescence is a popular detection method in a microfluidic
system while the UV-Visible region is not as widely used because of limited choices
of the materials for microfluidics fabrication that do not absorb light in the range of
UV-Visible detection wavelengths (Urban et al. 2006). By comparing fluorescence
signals from images taken at the inlet and the outlet, rate of the enzymatic reaction
can be determined. Fluorophores are usually attached to either the natural substrates
(Joensson and Svahn 2012) or the enzyme (Girault et al. 2018). The fluorophores
remain quenched until being released when substrates bind to the enzyme, as illustrated
in Fig. 9, in which fluorescence intensity indicates the extent of enzymatic activity.
In the droplet-based microfluidics, the observed fluorescence is usually the average
signal of many droplets travelling through the detector during the particular set
time duration, e.g., every 30s. However, the averaged responses cannot differentiate
activity in each single droplet (Yin and Marshall 2012). In order to study enzyme at a
single cell level, various attempts have been made for sorting of droplets (Beneyton
et al. 2016, Vallejo et al. 2019), commonly known as Fluorescence Activated Droplets
Sorting (FADS). For example, Vallejo et al. (2019) developed a microfluidic system
to discover new enzyme variants of particular properties. Droplets containing single
cell and substrate were collected for incubation, prior to being excited by a laser. The
droplets that emit fluorescence upon exposure to the laser indicate the presence of
the preferred enzyme variant. The emitted light activated the electrode, forcing the
droplet containing the desired cell to move into a certain outlet.
Ultrahigh throughput analysis can be performed by designing a multi-
microchannel to accommodate multi enzymatic reactions in parallel, and using
more than one fluorogenic substrate. Example reports include screening for the
particular cells that contain enzyme of specific characteristics of interest, e.g.,
Figure 9. Illustration of the use of fluorogenic substrate as a tool to detect enzymatic activity.
Uses of Flow‑based Systems for Enzyme Kinetics 17
Figure 10. Waxed paper was created by applying crayon wax onto one side of a piece of filter paper. a)
Heating of the waxed paper prevents liquid from leaking on both the front and back sides of the paper, and
b) Non-heated waxed paper has the problem of liquid leaking from the hydrophilic region on the back side
of the paper due to the lack of hydrophobic wax (modified from Nzobigeza and Hartwell 2019).
18 Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
Figure 11. Creating a microfluidic pattern using a laser engraver. A piece of filter paper is taped onto
aluminum foil using double sided tape. A laser engraver is used to cut the design imported from Corel
Draw, creating a hydrophilic pattern, with the aluminum foil acting as hydrophobic barrier (modified from
DeMott and Hartwell 2020).
hot plate. Heating is necessary for complete absorption of wax into the paper and to
create a hydrophobic barrier on both sides of the paper. Without heating, liquid can
leak out of the hydrophilic area on the back side which has not been directly coated
with hydrophobic material. Adding a graphite barrier around the pattern can also
better define the hydrophobic-hydrophilic boundary (Whitford et al. 2020). In order
to create a more precise or complicated design, equipment with higher precision such
as a laser engraver may be used. A common 60 W laser can cut through paper, but not
the aluminum foil backing (Mahmud et al. 2016). As shown in Fig. 11, by taping the
paper onto aluminum foil, the hydrophobic-hydrophilic pattern can be created and be
kept intact. If backing is not needed, removable double sided tape will allow for easy
detachment of the aluminum foil backing.
Despite many benefits of the mPADs, some drawbacks have been reported
(Carrell et al. 2019), especially regarding poor detection limit, short shelf-life of
the devices with pre-immobilized reagents, e.g., enzyme, and low reproducibility
of the reaction. The main way to improve detection limit has been accomplished
by integrating sensitive detection methods such as florescence, chemiluminescence,
or electrochemical detection onto the mPADs. As mentioned earlier, a fluorescence
substance is quenched until being released due to enzymatic reaction. As for
chemiluminescence, the reaction is usually initiated by the oxidizing agent in the
presence of a catalyst such as enzyme or metal ion (Li et al. 2019). The main advantage
of chemiluminescence over the fluorescence detection method is owing to its
simplicity with no requirement of excitation source. In addition, chemiluminescence
offers a wide calibration range and low background signal. Nevertheless, most
commercially available paper based biosensors utilize electrochemical detection
with electrodes screen printed onto the paper because of their convenient mass
production, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use (Caratelli et al. 2020).
Although enzymes can be immobilized on paper materials and Vmax and Km can
be found similar to those of free enzymes, researchers have reported that enzymes
tend to denature when being deposited and left to dry on paper for extended periods.
Shelf-life of biological materials can be increased by refrigeration. However, while
Ilacas and Gomez (2019) demonstrated successful storage of enzyme for 30 days
at low temperature, many works report lowered or inhibition of enzyme activities
Uses of Flow‑based Systems for Enzyme Kinetics 19
Table 2. Examples of flow based systems for determination of activities, kinetic parameters of enzymes,
and their applications.
...Table 2 contd.
Future trends
Microfluidics have progressed toward nanofluidic systems (van den Berg et al. 2010,
Chen et al, 2021). This lower volume manipulation would require a precise reagent
delivery system, and a sensitive detection method. Reduction of cost by using
cheaper materials that enable the possibility of mass production of the microfluidic/
nanofluidic systems are also of interest. For portable and field analyses, reducing the
number of fresh reagents would be of a great benefit. Therefore, long-term and stable
storage of the device with pre-immobilized reagents is necessary, and reusability
would be a plus. In many cases, the design of a device that can detect multiple
analytes is also desirable. Finally, bio-compatible devices that would not cause after-
use negative impact on health and environment would be welcome.
References
Adkins, J.A., E. Noviana and C.S. Henry. 2016. Development of a quasi-steady flow electrochemical
paper-based analytical device. Anal. Chem. 88: 10639−10647.
Agresti, J.J., E. Antipov, A.R. Abate, K. Ahn, A.C. Rowat, J.-C. Baret, M. Marquez, A.M. Klibanov,
A.D. Griffiths and D.A. Weitz. 2010. Ultrahigh-throughput screening in drop-based microfluidics for
directed evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 4004–4009.
Asanomi, Y., H. Yamaguchi, M. Miyazaki and H. Maeda. 2011. Enzyme-immobilized microfluidic
process reactors. Molecules 16: 6041–6059.
Atkins, P. and J. de Paula. 2017. Homogeneous catalysis. pp. 295–297. In: Elements of Physical Chemistry.
7th edition. Oxford University Press. New York, USA.
Becker, M., U. Spohn and R. Ulbrich-Hofmann. 1997. Detection and characterization of phospholipase D
by flow injection analysis. Anal. Biochem. 244: 55–61.
22 Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
Beneyton, T., I.P.M. Wijaya, P. Postros, M. Najah, P. Leblond, A. Couvent, E. Mayot, A.D. Griffiths and A.
Drevelle. 2016. High-throughput screening of filamentous fungi using nanoliter range droplet-based
microfluidics. Sci. Reports 6: 27223.
Boyer, R. 2002. Chapter 6: Enzymes I, reactions, kinetics, and inhibition. pp. 137–1388. In: Concepts in
Biochemistry. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. USA.
Bui, M.P.N., C.A. Li, K.N. Han, J. Choo, E.K. Lee and G.H. Seong. 2011. Enzyme kinetic measurements
using a droplet-based microfluidic system with a concentration gradient. Anal. Chem. 83: 1603–1608.
Calabria, D., M.M. Calabretta, M. Zangheri, E. Marchegiani, I. Trozzi, M. Guardigli, E. Michelini, F. Di
Nardo, L. Anfossi, C. Baggiani and M. Mirasoli. 2021. Recent advancements in enzyme-based lateral
flow immunoassays. Sensors 21: 3358.
Caratelli, V., A. Ciampaglia, J. Guiducci, G. Sancesario, D. Moscone and F. Arduini. 2020. Precision
medicine in Alzheimer’s disease: An origami paper-based electrochemical device for cholinesterase
inhibitors. Biosens. Bioelectron 165: 112411.
Carrell, C., A. Kava, M. Nguyen, R. Menger, Z. Munshi, Z. Call, M. Nussbaum and C. Henry. 2019.
Beyond the lateral flow assay: A review of paper-based microfluidics. Microelectron. Eng.
206: 45–54.
Casavant, B.P., E. Berthier, A.B. Theberge, J. Berthier, S. Montanez-Sauri, L.L. Bischel, K. Brakke,
C.J. Hedman, W. Bushman, N.P. Keller and D.J. Beebe. 2013. Suspended microfluidics. PNAS
110: 10111–10116.
Cedillo-Perez, V.V., V.A. Quintero-Lopez, U.R. Carrillo-Medrano and M.P. Canizares-Macias. 2017.
β-Glucosidase activity by sequential injection analysis: Evaluation of the free and immobilized
enzyme. Curr. Anal. Chem. 13: 128–136.
Chen, L., C. Yang, Y. Xiao, X. Yan, L. Hu, M. Eggersdorfer, D. Chen, D.A. Weitz and F. Ye. 2021.
Millifluidics, microfluidics, and nanofluidics: Manipulating fluids at varying length scales. Materials
Today Nano. 16: 100136.
DeMott, J. and S.K. Hartwell. 2020. An exploration of natural reagents for the ninhydrin reaction on a
paper analytical device. Undergraduate Thesis. Chemistry Department, Xavier University, Cincinnati,
Ohio, USA.
Dickinson, E. 1991. Chapter 9 Competitive adsorption and protein—surfactant interactions in oil-in-
water emulsions. pp. 114–129. In: Microemulsions and Emulsions in Foods. ACS Symp. Ser. 448.
American Chemical Society. USA.
Ding, Y., P.D. Howes and A.J. deMello. 2020. Recent advances in droplet microfluidics. Anal. Chem.
92: 132–149.
Ellerhorst, N.P. and S.K. Hartwell. 2019. Investigation of flow pattern in serpentine microchannel design.
Undergraduate Thesis. Chemistry Department, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Fisher, H.F. 2005. Transient-state kinetic approach to mechanisms of enzymatic catalysis. Acc. Chem.
Res. 38: 157–166.
Garcia-Viloca, M., J. Gao, M. Karplus and D.G. Truhlar. 2004. How enzymes work: Analysis by modern
rate theory and computer simulations. Science 303: 186–195.
Garstecki, P., M.J. Fuerstman, H.A. Stone and G.M. Whitesides. 2006. Formation of droplets and bubbles
in a microfluidic T-junction—Scaling and mechanism of break-up. Lab Chip 6: 437–446.
Girault, M., T. Beneyton, D. Pekin, L. Buisson, S. Bichon, C. Charbonnier, Y. del Amo and J.-C. Baret.
2018. High-content screening of plankton alkaline phosphatase activity in microfluidics. Anal. Chem.
90: 4174−4181.
Gupta, A., H.S. Matharoo, D. Makkar and R. Kumar. 2014. Droplet formation via squeezing mechanism
in a microfluidic flow-focusing device. Comput. Fluids 100: 218–226.
Hassan, S., A.M. Nightingalea and X. Niu. 2016. Continuous measurement of enzymatic kinetics in
droplet flow for point-of-care monitoring. Analyst 141: 3266–3273.
Hartwell, S.K. and K. Grudpan. 2012. Flow-based systems for rapid and high precision enzyme kinetics
studies. J. Anal. Methods Chem. Article ID 450716, 10 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/450716.
He, P., G. Greenway and S.J. Haswell. 2010. Development of enzyme immobilized monolith micro-
reactors integrated with microfluidic electrochemical cell for the evaluation of enzyme kinetics.
Microfluid. Nanofluid 8: 565–573.
Uses of Flow‑based Systems for Enzyme Kinetics 23
Honda, T., M. Miyazaki, H. Nakamura and H. Maeda. 2005. Immobilization of enzymes on a microchannel
surface through cross-linking polymerization. Chem. Commun. 5062–5064.
Ilacas, G. and F.A. Gomez. 2019. Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs): Miniaturization
and enzyme storage studies. Anal. Sci. 35: 379–384.
Jebrail, M.J. and A.R. Wheeler. 2010. Let’s get digital: Digitizing chemical biology with microfluidics.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14: 574–581.
Jeon, N.L., S.K.W. Dertinger, D.T. Chiu, I.S. Choi, A.D. Stroock and G.M. Whitesides. 2000. Generation
of solution and surface gradients using microfluidic systems. Langmuir 16: 8311–8316.
Joensson, H.N. and H.A. Svahn. 2012. Droplet microfluidics—A tool for single-cell analysis. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 51: 12176–12192.
Khongpet, W., P. Yanu, S. Pencharee, C. Puangpila, S.K. Hartwell, S. Lapanantnoppakhun, Y.
Yodthongdee, A. Paukpol and J. Jakmunee. 2020. A compact multi-parameter detection system based
on hydrodynamic sequential injection for sensitive determination of phosphate, nitrite, and nitrate in
water samples. Anal. Methods 12: 855–864.
Khongpet, W., S. Pencharee, C. Puangpila, S.K. Hartwell, S. Lapanantnoppakhun and J. Jakmunee. 2018.
Exploiting an automated microfluidic hydrodynamic sequential injection system for determination of
phosphate. Talanta 177: 77–85.
Kim, S. 2016. Programming of wicking behavior of hydrogel and paper-based microfluidic device. M.S.
Thesis. Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Koshland, D.E. 1958. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. PNAS
USA 44: 98–104.
Kracke-Helm, H.A., L. Brandes, B. Hitzmann, U. Rinas and K. Schiigerl. 1991. On-line determination of
intracellular P-galactosidase activity in recombinant Escherichia coli using flow injection analysis
(FIA). J. Biotechnol. 20: 95–104.
Kuddas, M. 2019. Chapter 1 Introduction to food enzymes. pp.1–18. In: Enzymes in Food Biotechnology:
Production, Applications, and Future prospects. Elsevier Inc. New York. USA.
Li, F., J. Liu, L. Guo, J. Wang, K. Zhang, J. He and H. Cui. 2019. High-resolution temporally resolved
chemiluminescence based on double layered 3D microfluidic paper-based device for multiplexed
analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron 141: 111472.
Li, X., Z. He, C. Li and P. Li. 2021. One-step enzyme kinetics measurement in 3D printed microfluidics
devices based on a high-performance single vibrating sharp-tip mixer. Anal. Chim. Acta
1172: 338677.
Lilly, M.D., W.E. Hornby and E.M. Crook. 1966. The kinetics of carboxymethylcellulose-ficin in packed
beds. Biochem. J. 100: 718–723.
Liu, C.H., I.C. Noxon, L.E. Cuellar, A.L. Thraen, C.E. Immoos, A.W. Martinez and P.J. Costanzo. 2017.
Characterization of reagent pencils for deposition of reagents onto paper-based microfluidic devices.
Micromachines 8: 242.
Ma, F., M.T. Chung, Y. Yao, R. Nidetz, L.M. Lee, A.P. Liu, Y. Feng, K. Kurabayashi and G.Y. Yang. 2018.
Efficient molecular evolution to generate enantioselective enzymes using a dual-channel microfluidic
droplet screening platform. Nat. Commun. 9: 1030.
Mahmud, A., E.J.M. Blondeel, M. Kaddoura and B.D. MacDonald. 2016. Creating compact and microscale
features in paper-based devices by laser cutting. Analyst 141: 6449–6454.
Mitchell, H.T., I.C. Noxon, C.A. Chaplan, S.J. Carlton, C.H. Liu, K.A. Ganaja, N.W. Martinez, C.E.
Immoos, P.J. Costanzo and A.W. Martinez. 2015. Reagent pencils: A new technique for solvent-free
deposition of reagents onto paper-based microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 15: 2213–2220.
Miyazaki, M., T. Honda, H. Yamaguchi, M.P.P. Briones and H. Maeda. 2008. Enzymatic processing in
microfluidic reactors. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 25: 405–42.
Nishat, S., A.T. Jafry, A.W. Martinez and F.R. Awan. 2021. Paper-based microfluidics: Simplified
fabrication and assay method. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 336: 129681.
Nooranidoost, M. and R. Kuma. 2019. Geometry effects of axisymmetric flow-focusing microchannels for
single cell encapsulation. Materials 12: 2811.
Nooranidoost, M., D. Izbassarov and M. Muradoglu. 2016. Droplet formation in a flow focusing
configuration: Effects of viscoelasticity. Phys. Fluids 28: 123102.
24 Some Key Topics in Chemistry and Biochemistry for Biotechnologists
Noviana, E., T. Ozer, C.S. Carrell, J.S. Link, C. McMahon, I. Jang and C.S. Henry. 2021. Microfluidic
paper-based analytical devices: From design to applications. Chem. Rev. 121: 11835–11885.
Nzobigeza, W. and S.K. Hartwell. 2019. Paper-based assay of copper ion using egg white as natural
reagent. Undergraduate Thesis. Chemistry Department, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Ochoa, A., F. Trejo and L.F. Olguín. 2020. Chapter 14 Droplet-based microfluidics methods for detecting
enzyme inhibitors. pp. 209–232. In: N.E. Labrou (ed.). Targeting Enzymes for Pharmaceutical
Development Methods and Protocol. Humana Press. New York, USA.
Osborn, J.L., B. Lutz, E. Fu, P. Kauffman, D.Y. Stevens and P. Yager. 2010. Microfluidics without pumps:
Reinventing the T-sensor and H-filter in paper networks. Lab Chip 10: 2659–2665.
Patton, C.J. and S.R. Crouch. 1986. Experimental comparison of flow-injection analysis and air-segmented
continuous flow analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 179: 189–201.
Pereira, S.A.P., F.D. Bobbink, P.J. Dyson and M.L.M.F.S. Saraiva. 2021. Automatic evaluation of
cyclooxygenase 2 inhibition induced by metal-based anticancer compounds. J. Inorg. Biochem.
218: 111399.
Pereira, S.A.P., P.J. Dyson and M.L.M.F.S. Saraiva. 2020. Miniaturized technologies for high-throughput
drug screening enzymatic assays and diagnostics: A review. Trends in Anal. Chem. 126: 115862.
Pinto, P.C.A.G., S.P.F. Costa, J.L.F.C. Lima and M.L.M.F.S. Saraiva. 2012. β-Galactosidase activity
in mixed micelles of imidazolium ionic liquids and sodium dodecylsulfate: A sequential injection
kinetic study. Talanta 96: 26–33.
Razak, N.N.A., S. Firmansyah and M.S.M. Annuar. 2020. Effects of microfluidization on kinetic parameter
values of lipase hydrolysis reaction. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 27: 101660.
Rezk, A.R., A. Qi, J.R. Friend, W.H. Lib and L.Y. Yeo. 2012. Uniform mixing in paper-based microfluidic
systems using surface acoustic waves. Lab Chip 12: 773–779.
Rho, H.S., A.T. Hanke, M. Ottens and H. Gardeniers. 2016. Mapping of enzyme kinetics on a microfluidic
device. PLOS ONE, 1–14.
Roach, L.S., H. Song and R.F. Ismagilov. 2005. Controlling nonspecific protein adsorption in a plug-
based microfluidic system by controlling interfacial chemistry using fluorous-phase surfactants. Anal.
Chem. 77: 785–796.
Rosenfeld, L., T. Lin, R. Derda and S.K.Y. Tang. 2014. Review and analysis of performance metrics of
droplet microfluidics systems. Microfluid. Nanofluid 16: 921–939.
Ṙuz̆ ic̆ ka, J. and E.H. Hansen. 1975. Flow injection analyses: Part I. A new concept of fast continuous flow
analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 78: 145–157.
Schilling, E. 2001. Basic microfluidic concepts. https://faculty.washington.edu/yagerp/
microfluidicstutorial/basicconcepts/basicconcepts.htm. Accessed April 27, 2022.
Scott, J.E. and K.P. Williams. 2012. Validating identity, mass purity and enzymatic purity of enzyme
preparations. pp. 81–92. In: S. Markossian (ed.). Assay Guidance Manual (updated 2021). Eli Lilly &
Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. USA.
Sedighi, A. and U.J. Krull. 2018. Enzymatic amplification of oligonucleotides in paper substrates. Talanta
186: 568–575.
Seong, G.H., J. Heo and R.M. Crooks. 2003. Measurement of enzyme kinetics using a continuous-flow
microfluidic system. Anal. Chem. 75: 3161–3167.
Siegesmund, E. and S.K. Hartwell. 2018. Microfluidics: Design and assembly. Undergraduate Thesis.
Chemistry Department, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Silvestre, C., P. Pinto, M.A. Segundo, M.L. Saraiva and J. Lima. 2011. Enzyme based assays in a sequential
injection format: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 689: 160–177.
Sohrabi, S., N. Kassir and M.K. Moraveji. 2020. Droplet microfluidics: Fundamentals and its advanced
applications. RSC Adv. 10: 27560–27574.
Song, H. and R.F. Ismagilov. 2003. Millisecond kinetics on a microfluidic chip using nanoliters of
reagents. J. Am. Chrm. Soc. 125: 14613–14619.
Song, H., D.L. Chen and R.F. Ismagilov. 2006. Reactions in droplets in microfluidic channels. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 45: 7336–7356.
Steegmans, M.L.J., C.G.P.H. Schroën and R.M. Boom. 2009b. Generalised insights in droplet formation
at T-junctions through statistical analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 64: 3042–3050.
Uses of Flow‑based Systems for Enzyme Kinetics 25
Steegmans, M.L.J., J. De Ruiter, K.G.P.H. Schroën and R.M. Boom. 2010. A descriptive force-balance
model for droplet formation at microfluidic Y-junctions. AIChE. J. 56: 2641–2649.
Steegmans, M.L.J., K.G.P.H. Schroën and R.M. Boom. 2009a. Characterization of emulsification at flat
microchannel Y junctions. Langmuir 25: 3396–3401.
Strelow, J., W. Dewe, P.W. Iversen, H.B. Brooks, J.A. Radding, J. McGee and J. Weidner. 2012. Mechanism
of action assays for enzymes. pp. 105–126. In: S. Markossian (ed.). Assay Guidance Manual (updated
2021). Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. USA.
Thomsen, M.S. and B. Nidetzky. 2008. Microfluidic reactor for continuous flow biotransformations
with immobilized enzymes: The example of lactose hydrolysis by a hyperthermophilic β-glycoside
hydrolase. Eng. Life Sci. 8: 40–48.
Tkachenko, E., E. Gutierrez, M.H. Ginsberg and A. Groisman. 2009. An easy to assemble microfluidic
perfusion device with a magnetic clamp. Lab Chip 9: 1085–1095.
Tsao, C. and D.L. DeVoe. 2009. Bonding of thermoplastic polymer microfluidics. Microfluid. Nanofluid
6: 1–16.
Urban, P.L., D.M. Goodall and N.C. Bruce. 2006. Enzymatic microreactors in chemical analysis and
kinetic studies. Biotechnol. Adv. 24: 42–57.
Ushikubo, F.Y., F.S. Birribilli, D.R.B. Oliveira and R.L. Cunha. 2014. Y- and T-junction microfluidic
devices: Effect of fluids and interface properties and operating conditions. Microfluid. Nanofluid
17: 711–720.
Vallejo, D., A. Nikoomanzar, B.M. Paegel and J.C. Chaput. 2019. Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting
for single-cell directed evolution. ACS Synth. Biol. 8: 1430–1440.
van den Berg, A., H.G. Craighead and P. Yang. 2010. From microfluidic applications to nanofluidic
phenomena. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39: 899–900.
van Staden, J.F. and S.I. Raluca. 2002. New horizons in sequential injection kinetic analysis. Anal.
Bioanal. Chem. 374: 3–12.
Vasella, A., G.J. Davies and M. Böhm. 2002. Glycosidase mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
6: 619–629.
Webster, A. 1983. Intrinsic, inherent, and observed kinetic data with immobilized enzymes: The concept
of rotational masking. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25: 2479–2484.
Wehking, J.D., M. Gabany, L. Chew and R. Kumar. 2014. Effects of viscosity, interfacial tension, and
flow geometry on droplet formation in a microfluidic T-junction. Microfluid. Nanofluid 16: 441–453.
Whitford, E., W. Nzobigeza and S.K. Hartwell. 2020. Paper based assay of copper (II) ion using egg white
as a natural chromogenic reagent. Anal. Lett. 53: 2465–2480.
Yerian, T.D., G.D. Christian and J. Ruzicka. 1988. Flow injection analysis as a diagnostic tool for
development and testing of a penicillin sensor. Anal. Chem. 60: 1250–1256.
Yin, H. and D. Marshall. 2012. Microfluidics for single cell analysis. Curr. Opin. Biotechol. 23: 110–119.
Yu, W., X. Liu, Y. Zhao and Y. Chen. 2019. Droplet generation hydrodynamics in the microfluidic cross-
junction with different junction angles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 203: 259–284.
Zheng, B. and R.F. Ismagilov. 2005. A microfluidic approach for screening submicroliter volumes against
multiple reagents by using preformed arrays of nanoliter plugs in a three-phase liquid/liquid/gas flow.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44: 2520–2523.
Chapter 2
Chemoproteomics
An Extremely Powerful Kit
in Drug Discovery Toolbox
Anupama Binoy,1,# Revathy Sahadevan1,# and
Sushabhan Sadhukhan1,2,*
Introduction
The human genome project (HGP) has revolutionized the scientific world by
providing a blueprint of genes encoding the entire human proteome and one cannot
overstate its importance for modern pharmacology. This allowed us to understand the
information present on approximately 20,000 protein-coding genes (Legrain et al.
2011). However, there is a huge knowledge gap on various functional and redundant
proteins in the human proteome, their cellular localization, and distribution, their
abundance as well as their interaction with small molecules. Additionally, the existence
of splice variants and the post-translational modifications (PTMs) make the human
proteome more complicated than it seems. In 2009, the human proteome project
was launched to prepare a human proteome map with a gene-centric approach (A
Gene-Centric Human Proteome Project: HUPO--the Human Proteome Organization,
2010). The intention was to generate publicly accessible information resources for
further exploration by the scientific community. The word ‘proteome’ was coined
quite early by Mark Wilkins in 1994 (Wilkins and Gooley 1997) describing it as the
1
Department of Chemistry, Physical & Chemical Biology Laboratory, Indian Institute of Technology
Palakkad, Kerala 678 623, India.
2
Department of Biological Sciences & Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Kerala 678
623, India.
Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]
* Corresponding authors: [email protected]
# Authors contributed equally.
Chemoproteomics: An Extremely Powerful Kit in Drug Discovery Toolbox 27
referred to as activity-based probes (ABP) (Berger et al. 2004) and are designed
to be bioorthogonal in nature, i.e., they should act without interfering with the
native physiology of live cells (Chan et al. 2021). It is generally comprised of three
components, (i) a warhead or reactive group, (ii) a reporter tag, and (iii) a linker
connecting the first two, i.e., the warhead and the reporter tag (Fig. 1). A reactive
group (also known as warhead) is designed to enable the covalent interaction between
the small molecule and its target protein. It can be the entire molecule of interest
itself or a part of it with the desired functional group which can selectively interact
with amino acids in the active site of enzymes. Several reactive functional groups
such as sulphonate ester (Adam et al. 2001, Adam et al. 2002a), epoxide (Greenbaum
et al. 2000, Chen et al. 2003, Marques et al. 2017), fluorophosphonate (Liu et al.
1999, Field et al. 2020, Faucher et al. 2020), peptide (acyloxy)methyl ketone (Sexton
et al. 2006, van de Plassche et al. 2020), etc., have been widely used to design and
synthesize reactive warheads. A reporter tag is used to visualize, pulldown, or enrich
the target protein for identification and further validation studies. Fluorescent or
radiolabeled tags are generally used for visualization, and biotin tags are used for the
purification and mass spectrometric identification of target proteins. A linker group is
introduced to connect the reporter tag with the reactive warhead. They are designed
to control the steric hindrances and specificity of the attached groups (Meng et al.
2017). Linkers can be long alkyl chains, or poly ethylene glycol (PEG), or short
peptides. To study the small molecule-protein non-covalent interactions, photo-cross
linkers such as diazirine, benzophenone groups, etc., have been introduced to the
linker region of the probe (Guo and Li 2017). Upon photo-irradiation, these photo-
crosslinkers yield reactive carbenes which are capable of capturing non-covalently
interacting proteins or adjacent proteins that reside near the active site of the target
protein. This in turn helps in the identification of the mode of action of the small
molecules by elucidating if the small molecule is working through any off-targets.
There exists another type of probe which has been designed by introducing a terminal
alkyne or azide functional group to the molecule of interest. These kinds of probes
exert the least steric hindrance in terms of their interaction with bio-macromolecules.
The reporter tags can be introduced in the downstream process via alkyne-azide
Click reactions with an alkyne/azide derivative of fluorescent counterpart or biotin
(Meldal et al. 2008).
profiling (ABPP) is based on the covalent interaction between small molecules (such
as inhibitors, ligands, drugs, etc.) and the reactive amino acid side chains present in
the active site of the enzymes; unlike other techniques which mainly focus on non-
covalent interactions. ABPP is mostly utilized under physiological conditions and it
potentially reflects true drug-target interactions taking place inside the native cellular
environment. In principle, the activity-based probes should not differ significantly
from the parent molecule in terms of its biological activities. As discussed in above,
there are two important components in an activity-based probe: (i) the reactive
group (in the compound of interest) for binding or covalently modifying the active
site of the target proteins and (ii) a reporter tag for the detection and enrichment
of the target proteins. Often, a linker is placed in between the molecule of interest
and the reporter group to avoid any possible steric hindrance. The probes are
incubated with the live cells and allowed to physiologically interact with the cellular
components before they are lysed, followed by an affinity enrichment of the target
protein using the reporter group. Biotin is the most frequently used reporter owing
to its strong affinity towards avidin, where enrichment is performed using either
avidin or streptavidin (an avidin analog with a more convenient binding constant
with biotin) beads. While, in the case of fluorescent reporters, efficient and rapid
detection, as well as visualization of proteins, can be done through an in-gel
fluorescence experiment (Fig. 3). ABPP probes have been utilized to study different
enzyme families like kinases (Yee et al. 2005, Liu et al. 2005), phosphatases (Kumar
et al. 2004), oxidoreductases (Adam et al. 2001, Adam et al. 2002b, 2002a),
glycosidases (Hekmat et al. 2005, Vocadlo and Bertozzi 2004), proteases (Liu et al.
1999, Kidd et al. 2001), etc. This strategy involved the covalent labeling of the active
site of enzymes in an activity-based manner which helped to distinguish between
functional enzymes from their inactive zymogens (Kidd et al. 2001, Liu et al. 1999,
Adam et al. 2001).
ABPP has also been successfully applied in identifying protein targets of various
natural products/drug molecules. For example, Yee et al. (2005) attached fluorescent
labels (BODIPY and rhodamine) to Wortmannin enabling the identification of its
binding partners from HEK 293T cell lysates. This led to the identification of PI-3
kinases and other associated proteins as the major targets of Wortmannin (Yee et al.
2005). With a similar strategy, Liu and co-workers identified other kinases such as
Polo-like kinase 1 and 3 (Plk1and Plk3) as the cellular targets of Wortmannin (Liu
et al. 2007). Klaic et al. (2012) developed an affinity probe of biotinylated celestrol
to elucidate its potential targets as annexin II, β-tubulin, and eukaryotic elongation
factor 1A (Klaic et al. 2012). Greenbaum et al. (2000), developed ABPP probes based
on epoxysuccinyl peptide with different reporter groups such as the radionuclide
125I, biotin, and the BODIPY (fluorophore). They were able to validate cathepsin
as the major target of the E-64, an inhibitor of cysteine protease (Greenbaum
et al. 2000). Cravatt’s group successfully profiled the global serine hydrolases in
the complex proteome by synthesizing a biotinylated fluorophosphonate (FP-biotin)
which showed affinity toward several members of the serine hydrolase family
(Liu et al. 1999). They also synthesized a variant of FP-biotin by replacing the
Chemoproteomics: An Extremely Powerful Kit in Drug Discovery Toolbox 33
hydrophobic alkyl chain linker with a more hydrophilic polyethylene glycol (PEG)
moiety to obtain FP-PEG-biotin. Both the probes showed a similar ability to fish out
multiple members of serine hydrolases like serine peptidases, lipases, and esterases
simultaneously (Kidd et al. 2001).
3. Click‑able probes:
The application of biotinylated probes poses problems due to their large sizes which
can interfere with the way they interact with the biomacromolecules as compared to
the parent analogs of the probes. Advancements in ABPP technology alleviated steric
hindrances associated with a bulky reporter like biotin or fluorescent tags by adapting
a two-step strategy that took advantage of bioorthogonal reactions. Bioorthogonal
reactions refer to the chemical reactions that can happen within the living system
without interfering its native biological processes (Sletten and Bertozzi 2009, Prescher
et al. 2004, Prescher and Bertozzi 2005). This method involves the functionalization
of the molecule of interest with a small functional group (such as a terminal alkyne
or azide) that does not interfere with the native physiological activities of a living
system, which ultimately can yield the profiling of enzyme activities in vitro as well
as in vivo systems (Fig. 3). As depicted in Fig. 2, the identification of target proteins
can be achieved by the downstream addition of reporter tags through bioorthogonal
reactions between the complements such as alkyne with an azide moiety (Vasilyeva
et al. 2016, Zhou and Fahrni 2004), alkene with tetrazine (Wu and Devaraj 2018), or
Staudinger ligation (Sletten and Bertozzi 2011, Bednarek et al. 2020).
Due to the minimal steric hindrance and bio-orthogonal nature of these
probes, they pose the least interferences to the pharmacological activity of the drug
Figure 3. Illustrated representation of various chemoproteomics-based tools and their mode of action for
identification and validation of protein targets.
4. Photoaffinity labeling
It is relatively easier to identify the proteins which covalently interact with the small
molecules as the resulting complex is stable enough for downstream processing
and mass-spectrometric analysis. On the contrary, there exists a significant number
of biologically active molecules which interact non-covalently (via hydrophobic-
hydrophobic, van der Walls interaction, ionic interaction, or hydrogen bonding, etc.)
with the proteins and this results in very labile protein-small molecule complexes
which are prone to degradation as soon as cells are lysed. In this kind of situation,
photoaffinity labeling comes to the rescue. It is a unique and unbiased strategy that
utilizes photoactivation of the probe that is bearing a photo-crosslinker. These groups
remain inactive under normal chemical and biological conditions but get activated
when they are irradiated at a specific wavelength to yield highly reactive transient
species (e.g., carbenes) that crosslink the probe to its binding partners (Fig. 3). This is
followed by a Click reaction which enables the downstream enrichment of captured
proteins. Benzophenones, aryl azides, and alkyl or aryl diazirines are commonly used
photo crosslinkers in this context (Mishra et al. 2020). Hulce et al. (2013) utilized
photoaffinity probes for the global identification of cholesterol-binding proteins
(Hulce et al. 2013). They synthesized a set of structurally similar probes made of
sterol moiety connected to the photoactivatable diazirine group. HeLa cells were
incubated with this probe and further photoactivated through exposure to 365 nm
UV light to covalently cross-link the probe to its binding proteins. Later, Click reaction
with the biotin azide followed by streptavidin enrichment led to the identification of
approximately 250 cholesterol-binding proteins. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid
(SAHA) was the first histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor to get the FDA approval.
Salisbury and Cravatt (2007) developed SAHA-BPyne as a probe for suberoylanilide
hydroxamic acid (SAHA), the first FDA-approved HDAC inhibitor to identify
the proteins that come together (non-covalently) to form the active complex for
histone deacetylases (HDACs). SAHA was modified using benzophenone moiety
(a photo-crosslinker) to covalently capture the HDAC-associated proteins like
MTA2, CoREST, and methyl CpG binding protein 3 (MBD3) (Salisbury and Cravatt
2007).
Figure 4. Schematic representation of application of ABPP in drug screening. (A) Direct labeling of
proteins with probes to identify the targets, (B) Competitive labeling and (C) Screening of library of
inhibitors for their specificity.
for the enzymes (orphan enzymes) that lack any information about their activities
or substrates. Selective inhibitors can be readily identified from the non-specific
inhibitors and this is particularly of immense importance for the ones that belong to
a large family of enzymes having multiple isoforms such as kinases or hydrolases.
Greenbaum et al. (2002) used this approach to identify the targets of cysteine
proteases using a library of irreversible inhibitors containing primary tripeptide
skeleton linked with an epoxide electrophile. The inhibitory action was visualized
with radiolabeled active site-directed probe, 125I-DCG-04 treatment for proteases
followed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging. This method allowed them to
identify multiple targets of each inhibitor in a single gel-based assay without any
optimization of substrate and kinetic conditions (Greenbaum et al. 2002). A similar
strategy was used by Leung et al. (2003) to screen the serine hydrolase inhibitors
from a library of compounds containing electrophilic ketone group. The protein-
inhibitor complex was visualized through competitive assay with fluorophosphonate
rhodamine (FP-Rhodamine). They found that fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH),
an endocannabinoid-degrading enzyme and triacylglycerol hydrolase are the most
important targets of the serine hydrolase inhibitors (Leung et al. 2003). In another
study, Bonavia et al. (2011) found that carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 2, and
aspartate transcarbamylase and dihydroorotase (CAD) complex are the targets of
isoxazole- pyrazole and their proline derivatives that are effective against respiratory
syncytial virus (Bonavia et al. 2011).
Mevr. Warren. Nee, dat weet je niet. Ik wel. Ze noemde d’r eigen een
weduwvrouw en ze had ’n winkel van gebakken visch ergens bij de Munt
en daar onderhield ze d’r eigen en d’r vier dochters van. Twee van ons ware
zusters, dat ware Lies en ik, en we zage d’r allebei goed uit, met knappe
figure. Ik vermoed, dat onze vader ’n goedgevoede man was. Moeder
beweerde, dat ’t een heer was, maar dà weet ik niet. De andere twee ware
maar halfzusters: kleine, leelijke, magere, slovende, eerlijke onderkruipsels.
Lies en ik zouen ze half vermoord hebben, als moeder òns niet half
vermoord had, om onze handen van ze af te houden. Zij waren de
fatsoenlijken van ons. Nou, weet je wat ze kregen voor d’r fatsoen? De eene
werkte in ’n loodwitfabriek,—12 uur daags voor 9 shilling in de week,
totdat ze stierf an loodwitvergiftiging. Ze dacht, dat ze alleen maar d’r
handen wat verlamd zou krijgen, maar ze ging er van dood. De ander werd
ons altijd voorgehouden als ’n voorbeeld, omdat ze met ’n werkman van de
rijkswerf trouwde en d’r kamer en d’r drie kinderen netjes en zuiver hield
van 18 shilling in de week, totdat hij aan de drank raakte. Dat was de
moeite waard om fatsoenlijk voor te zijn, niet?
Mevr. Warren. Lies niet, dat kan ik je vertellen, diè was wijzer. We gingen
allebei na ’n kerkelijke school,—dat hoorde zoo bij de damesachtige
manieren die we ons gaven om meer te zijn dan de kinderen, die niks wisten
en nergens heengingen,—en daar bleven we, totdat Lies eens op ’n nacht
wegliep en nooit terug kwam. Ik weet, dat de schooljuffrouw dacht, dat ik
wel gauw d’r voorbeeld zou volgen,—want de dominé waarschuwde me
aldoor, dat Lies zou eindigen met van Waterloo-brug af te springen.—Arme
hals,—dat was àl wat hij er van wist! Maar ik had meer angst voor de
loodwitfabriek dan voor de rivier, en dat zou jij ook gehad hebben in mijn
plaats.—De dominé wist ’n betrekking voor me te krijgen, as bijhulp in de
keuken van ’n afschaffersrestauratie, waar ze uitzonden met alles wat je
hebben wou.—Toen ben ik kellnerin geworden en daarna ging ik an ’t
buffet van ’t Waterloostation,—veertien uur per dag drank bedienen en
glazen omwasschen voor 4 shillings in de week en de kost. Dat werd toen
beschouwd as ’n groote vooruitgang voor me.—Nou, op ’n kouwe,
ellendige nacht, toen ik zòò moe was, dat ik nauwelijks wakker kon blijven,
wie denk je dat er binnen kwam voor ’n halve schotsche? Lizzie;—in ’n
lange, bonte mantel, elegant en lekker, met ’n hoop goudstukke in d’r beurs!
Vivie (nu geweldig geïnteresseerd). Nee, maar waarom koos u diè zaak.
Met spaarzaamheid en goed beheer kun je elke zaak er boven op werken.
Mevr. Warren. Ja, geld opsparen. Maar in welke zaak kàn ’n vrouw geld
opspare? Zou jij kenne sparen van 4 shillings in de week en je d’r van
kleeje ook? Jij niet. Natuurlijk, as je ’n dood gewoon mensch ben en niks
anders kan verdienen, of as je idee heb in muziek of ’t tooneel, of
krantegeschrijf,—dan is ’t iets anders. Maar zoomin Lies as ik hadden eenig
benul van die dingen; alles wat wij hadden was ons uiterlijk en onze slag
om de mannen in te pakken. Denk je, dat wij zulke gekken waren, om
andere menschen zaken te laten doen met ònze mooie oogen, door òns te
gebruiken as winkelmeisjes, of buffetjuffrouwen, of kellnerinnen, as wij
zèlf er zaken mee konden doen en al ’t profijt in ònze zak steken, inplaats
van hongerloonen? Wìj niet, hoor.
Mevr. Warren. Ja, en uit ieder ànder oogpunt ook. Waartoe wordt ieder
fatsoenlijk meisje anders grootgebracht als om ’n rijke man in te palmen en
het voordeel van z’n geld te hebben door hem te trouwen? Asof ’n
huwelijksceremonie eenig verschil maakt in het goeie of het slechte van de
zaak! O, de huichelarij van de wereld maakt me misselijk! Lies en ik
hadden te werke en te spare en te berekene net zoo goed als andere
menschen; anders zouen we nou even arm zijn als iedere nikswaardige
dronken doorbrengster van ’n vrouw, die denkt dat d’r goeie tijd altijd zal
duren (met groote energie). Ik veracht dat soort menschen;—ze hebben
geen karakter. En as d’r iets is, dat ik haat in ’n vrouw, dan is ’t gebrek an
karakter.
Vivie. Kom nou, moeder, wees ’ns eerlijk! Is ’t niet voor ’n deel wat je
noemt karakter in ’n vrouw, dat haar die afschuw moet geven van dèze
manier van geld verdienen.
Mevr. Warren. Natuurlijk is ’t de moeite waard voor ’n arm meisje, dat d’r
eigen niet weggooit en er goed uitziet en zich verstandig en netjes gedraagt.
’t Is oneindig beter dan eenige andere betrekking, die ze hebben kan. Ik heb
altijd gevonden dat dat zoo niet moest zijn. ’t Kàn niet rechtvaardig zijn,
Vivie, dat ’n vrouw geen betere kansen zou hebben. Ik blijf er bij: dat is
verkeerd. Maar goed of verkeerd, ’t is eenmaal zoo, en ’n meisje moet ’t
neme zooas ’t is. Maar natuurlijk is ’t niet de moeite waard voor ’n dame.
Als jij die kant uitging, zou je dwaas zijn; maar ìk zou dwaas geweest zijn,
as ik ’t nièt had gedaan.
Vivie. Ik geloof, dat ik ’t zal zijn, die nu niet zal kunnen slapen. (Zij gaat
naar ’t buffetje en steekt de kaars aan. Dan doet ze de lamp uit, waardoor
de kamer veel donkerder wordt). We zullen wat frissche lucht in laten vòòr
we sluiten. (Zij opent de buitendeur en ziet dat ’t heldere maan is). Kijk
eens! (Zij trekt de gordijnen van ’t raam open. Men ziet het landschap
badend in de stralen van ’n nazomermaan, die boven Blackdown rijst).
Mevr. Warren (met ’n vluchtigen blik naar buiten). Ja liefje, maar pas op,
dat je geen kou vat van de nachtlucht.
Vivie (minachtend). Gekheid!
Mevr. Warren (knorrig). Welzeker, alles wat ik zeg is gekheid volgens jou.
Vivie (keert zich haastig naar haar toe). Nee, dat is volstrekt niet waar,
moeder. U hebt ’t vannacht totaal van me gewonnen, hoewel ìk gewild had,
dat ’t andersom zou zijn geweest. Laten we nu goeie vrienden zijn.
Vivie. Dat hindert niet... Kom, goeie nacht goeie, oude moeder. (Zij omarmt
haar moeder).
Mevr. Warren. En je zult goed zijn voor je arme, ouwe moeder, niet waar?
Frank zit op den stoel bij den zonnewijzer, waarop hij de ochtendbladen
gelegd heeft en leest de Standard, (conservatief Londensch blad). Zijn vader
komt ’t huis uit, rillerig en met roode oogen;—en ontmoet Franks blik wat
onzeker.
Frank (kijkt op z’n horloge). Half twaalf, ’n Mooi uur voor ’n dominé om
te komen ontbijten.
Dominé Sam. Spot niet Frank, spot niet. Ik ben ’n beetje .... è ... (hij rilt).
Frank. Katterig?
Frank. Daar zal ze mogelijk wel aan gedacht hebben. In ieder geval, als
Crofts hier nog blijft en jij iederen nacht tot vier uur toe met hem op blijft
zitten, om herinneringen uit je vurige jeugd op te halen, dan is ’t natuurlijk
m’n moeders plicht om naar stad te gaan en ’n vat whisky en ’n paar
honderd flesschen spuitwater te bestellen.
Dominé. Ik heb niet opgemerkt, dat Jhr. George bizonder veel heeft
gedronken.
Frank. O, al lang. Die is zoo frisch als ’n hoen; hij is veel beter geoefend
dan jij:—heeft de training waarschijnlijk tot nu toe bijgehouden. Hij is
ergens gaan rooken. (Frank neemt z’n krant weer op. De dominé wendt zich
ontstemd naar het hek toe en komt dan besluiteloos terug).
Frank. Ja.
Frank. Ze zijn al geïnviteerd. Crofts vertelde ons aan ’t ontbijt, dat je hem
gezegd hadt om mevrouw Warren en Vivie vandaag hier te brengen en hun
te verzoeken dit huis als het hunne te beschouwen. ’t Was na diè
mededeeling, dat moeder bedacht, dat ze naar stad moest met den trein van
11.13.
Dominé (met wanhopige heftigheid). Ik heb die invitatie niet gedaan. Ik heb
noòit aan zoo iets gedacht.
Dominé. Ja, dat is ’t ook. Als u wilt, zal Frank ’n eindje met u gaan
wandelen. Ik hoop dat u me zult excuseeren: ik moet de gelegenheid
waarnemen om m’n preek te schrijven, terwijl mevrouw Gardner weg is en
m’n gasten zich amuseeren. U neemt me niet kwalijk, niet waar?
Praed. Zeker niet, u moet voor mij niet de minste complimenten maken.
Dominé. Dank u. Ik zal... è... è... (stamelend gaat hij naar den ingang en
verdwijnt in huis).
Praed (gaat op ’t gras zitten en pakt z’n enkels beet). Wonderlijk moet dat
zijn om iedere week ’n preek te schrijven.
Frank. Heel wonderlijk als hij ’t deèd. Hij koopt ze. Hij is nou spuitwater
gaan drinken.
Praed. Beste jongen, ik wou dat je meer respect toonde tegenover je vader.
Je weet zelf hoe aardig je kunt zijn als je wìlt.
Frank. M’n goeie Praeddie, je vergeet dat ik met den ouden heer moet
lèven. Als twee menschen samen wonen—’t doet er niet toe of ze vader en
zoon, man en vrouw of broeder en zuster zijn—dan kunnen ze onmogelijk
de beleefde voor-den-gek-houderij volhouden, die zoo makkelijk valt voor
’n minuut of tien op ’n middagvisite. De oude heer nou, die aan veel
bewonderenswaardige huiselijke hoedanigheden paart de besluiteloosheid
van ’n schaap met de opgeblazenheid en de ongemakkelijkheid van ’n
jakhals...
Praed. Nee, asjeblieft, beste Frank. Bedenk toch, dat hij je vader is.
Frank. Daar geef ik hem alle eer van.—Maar stel je voor, dat hij Crofts
gezegd heeft om de Warrens hier te brengen!! Hij moet totaal weg zijn
geweest. Je weet beste Praeddie, dat m’n moeder haar dadelijk weg zou
kijken. Vivie moet hier niet komen, vòòrdat zij naar de stad terug is.
Praed. Maar je moeder weèt toch niets van mevrouw Warren, wel?
Frank. Ik weet ’t niet. Haar gaan naar de stad doet me denken van wel.
Niet, dat ’t m’n moeder in ’t algemeèn zou kunnen schelen. Zij heeft ’t
dikwijls kranig opgenomen voor ’n massa vrouwen, die in moeilijkheden
waren geraakt. Maar dat waren allemaal behoòrlijke vrouwen. Daarin zit
’em het verschil. Mevrouw Warren heeft zeker haar eigenaardige
verdiensten, maar ze is zoo allemachtig lawaaiig,—en m’n moeder zou haar
eenvoudig niet kunnen dulden. Daarom... Allo! (Deze uitroep wordt
veroorzaakt door de wederverschijning van den dominé, die haastig en
ontsteld z’n huis uitkomt).
Dominé. Frank, mevrouw Warren en haar dochter komen de hei over met
Crofts. Ik zag ze van uit m’n studeerkamer. Wat moèt ik zeggen van je
moeder?
Frank. Daar is nou geen tijd voor om over te denken. Hier! (Hij vliegt ’t
huis in en keert onmiddellijk terug met ’n vilten dominé’s hoed, die hij z’n
vader op ’t hoofd duwt). Maak nu, dat je weg komt. Praed en ik zullen hier
wachten, om het zaakje ’n ongezocht aanzien te geven. (De dominé,
beduusd maar gehoorzaam, snelt weg door ’t hek. Praed staat op en stoft
zichzelf af).
Frank (z’n tanden op elkaar). Krijg jij er geen kippenvel van? Die kwaje
oude duvel, in staat tot àlles wat gemeen is, en Vivie.... brr!
Praed. Sst, asjeblieft. Daar komen ze. (De dominé en Crofts komen samen
het rijpad op, gevolgd door Mevrouw Warren en Vivie, die heel innig met
elkaar loopen.)
Frank. Kijk, ze heeft waarachtig haar arm om het middel van de oude
vrouw. ’t Is haar rechterarm; zij moet er mee begonnen zijn. God in den
hemel, ze is sentimenteel geworden! Ai! jai! Krijg je nou geen kippenvel?
(De dominé opent het hek en mevrouw Warren en Vivie gaan hem voorbij en
blijven in het midden van den tuin naar ’t huis staan kijken. Frank, in ’n
extase van veinzerij, wendt zich vroolijk naar mevrouw Warren toe en roept
uit): Alleraangenaamst om u te zien, mevrouw Warren,—deze rustige, oude
pastorie-tuin flatteert u bizonder.
Mevr. Warren. Wel, heb je ooit! Hoor je dat George? Hij zegt dat ik er zoo
goed uitzie in ’n rustigen, ouden pastorie-tuin.
Dominé (houdt het hek nog open voor Crofts, die er met ’n bizonder
landerig air doorheen slentert). U ziet er overal goed uit, mevrouw Warren.
Mevr. Warren. Wel ja, laten we maar gaan en ’t afdoen: ’t Zal George
goed doen; de kerk zal van hèm niet veel last hebben, wed ik.
Dominé. Neen, die weg niet. We zullen door ’t veld gaan, als u ’t goed
vindt. Dèzen kant uit.
Crofts. O, mij goed. (Hij gaat met den dominé. Praed volgt met mevrouw
Warren. Vivie beweegt zich niet, maar kijkt hen na met de lijnen van
vastberadenheid scherp geteekend op haar gezicht).
Frank. Kom je niet?
Frank. M’n beste Vivie, dat zou ze niet apprecieëren. Ze is heel anders dan
m’n moeder: dezelfde behandeling zou voor die twee niet deugen. Maar wat
ter wereld is er met je gebeurd? Gisterenavond waren we ’t samen volmaakt
eens over je moeder en haar kliek. En van morgen stel je je sentimenteel
aan met je arm om haar middel heen.
Frank. Dièn indruk maakte ’t op me. Den eèrsten keer dat ik je iets zag
doen van twijfelachtig allooi.
Frank. En vandaag?
Vivie (haar gezicht vertrekt pijnlijk, dan ziet ze hem vast aan). Vandaag ken
ik m’n moeder beter dan jij.
Frank (ad rem haar zin voor haar afmakend). Dan zou ik weten waàrom ze
is geworden, wàt ze is,—is ’t zoo niet? Wat zou er dat toe doen?
Omstandigheden of geen omstandigheden Viv,—je zult nooit met je moeder
kunnen opschieten.
Frank. Omdat ze ’n slecht wijf is, Viv. Als je ooit weer in mijn bijzijn je
arm om haar middel slaat, dan schiet ik me op de plaats zelf voor m’n kop,
—als ’n protest tegen ’n vertooning, die me in opstand brengt.
Frank. Dat zou de oude dame ’n veel te slechte kans geven. Nee, Viv, je
verwaande jongentje zal je in geen geval aan je lot overlaten. Maar daarom
moet hij ook zorgen, dat je geen vergissingen begaat.—’t Geeft allemaal
niks, Viv, je moeder ìs eenmaal onmogelijk. Ze mag in haar soort niet
kwaad zijn,—maar ’t soort zelf ìs slecht, door en door slecht.
Vivie (heftig). Frank! (Hij blijft kalm. Zij wendt zich af en gaat zitten op de
bank onder den taxus, worstelend om haar zelfbeheersching te herkrijgen.
Dan zegt ze). Moet ze door iedereen verlaten worden, omdat ze eenmaal is
wat jij “’n slecht soort” noemt? Heeft ze geen recht om te leven?
Frank. Daar hoef je niet bang voor te wezen, Viv; zij zal nooit verlaten
zijn. (Hij gaat naast haar zitten op de bank).
Frank (sust haar op babyachtige manier en vleit haar met z’n stem). Moèt
niet met haar leven. Familiegroepje van moeder en dochter zou geen succes
zijn. Zou òns groepje bederven.
Vivie (hem zachtjes wiegend als ’n moeder). Vast in slaap, hand in hand,
onder de boomen.
Vivie. Het lieve kleine jongentje, met het zielige kleine meisje.
Frank. Heel, hèèl rustig en bevrijd van de idiotigheid van den vader van ’t
jongentje en de rarigheid van de moe....
Vivie (het woord smorend tegen haar borst aan). St. st. stst! ’t Kleine
meisje wil alles vergeten van haar moeder. (Zij zwijgen eenige oogenblikken
elkaar wiegend. Dan komt Vivie plotseling tot bezinning en roept uit): Wat
’n paar gekken zijn we! Kom, zit overeind. Goeie hemel, je haar! (Zij strijkt
’t glad). Ik zou wel eens willen weten of alle groote menschen zoo
kinderachtig doen, als er niemand bij is. Ik heb ’t nooit gedaan als kind.
Frank. Ik ook niet. Jij bent m’n eerste speelkameraad. (Hij vat haar hand
en wil die kussen, maar houdt eerst even op om rond te kijken. Heel
onverwacht verschijnt Crofts door de palmhaag). O verdomd!
Frank (fluisterend). Sst! Daar komt die fielt van ’n Crofts aan. (Hij gaat
verder van haar af zitten met ’n heel onschuldig gezicht).
Vivie. Wees niet lomp tegen hem, Frank. Ik wil erg m’n best doen om
beleefd tegen hem te zijn. Dat zal m’n moeder plezier doen. (Frank trekt ’n
leelijk gezicht).
Vivie. Zeker.
Crofts (tot Frank). Je excuseert me wel, Gardner.—Ze wachten op je in de
kerk, als je er niets tegen hebt.
Frank (staat op). Ik wil je graag van dienst zijn, Crofts, behalve met naar
de kerk te gaan. Als je iets noodig hebt, Vivie, bel dan aan ’t hek, dan
verschijnt een van de dienstboden. (Hij gaat ’t huis in met kalme
beminnelijkheid).
Vivie. Vindt u?
Crofts. Wel, wat moet hij uitvoeren? Heeft geen betrekking en geen
fortuin.—Waar dient hij toe?
Crofts (’n beetje van z’n stuk gebracht, omdat hij zoo volmaakt doorzien
wordt). O zòò meen ik ’t niet, Maar zoolang we eenmaal op deze wereld
zijn, moeten we er ook rekening mee houden,—en geld is geld. (Vivie
antwoordt niet). ’n Mooie dag, vindt u niet?
Crofts (met brutale jovialiteit, alsof hij haar flinkheid bewondert). Wel,
daarover wou ik anders niet praten (met voorgewende openhartigheid).
Luister ’ns, juffrouw Vivie. Ik ben me volkomen bewust, dat ik geen man
voor dames ben.
Crofts. Nee; en om u de waarheid te zeggen, dat wil ik ook niet zijn. Maar
als ik wat zeg, dan meen ik het;—als ik iets voel, dan voel ik ’t ècht,—en
wat ik graag wil hebben, daar wil ik ook goed voor betalen. Dàt soort van
man ben ik.
Crofts. O, ik wil m’n eigen lof niet zingen. De hemel weet, dat ik m’n
fouten heb;—geen man ziet die beter dan ik. Ik weet, dat ik niet volmaakt
ben: die zelfkennis is een van de voordeelen van ’n man van middelbaren
leeftijd;—want ik bèn niet jong meer en daar geef ik me niet voor uit ook.
Mìjn moraal is heel eenvoudig en ik geloof goed: Eergevoel tusschen man
en man, trouw tusschen man en vrouw en geen malle praatjes over den een
of anderen godsdienst, maar ’n eerlijk geloof, dat de wereld geleidelijk
vooruitgaat.
Crofts. Kom nou, juffrouw Vivie,—u hoeft u niet te houden, alsof u niet
weet, waar ik heen wil. Ik verlang om me te vestigen met ’n “Lady Crofts”.
—Ik vermoed, dat u me wel erg botaf vindt?
Vivie. Volstrekt niet. Ik ben er u heel dankbaar voor, dat u zoo kort en
zakelijk bent. Ik stel uw aanbod zeer op prijs: het geld, de positie, Lady
Crofts en zoo al meer. Maar, met uw welnemen, zal ik toch maar “nee”
zeggen. Liever niet. (Zij staat en drentelt naar den zonnewijzer, om wat uit
z’n onmiddellijke nabijheid te zijn).
Crofts (in ’t minst niet ontmoedigd, gebruik makend van de meerdere
plaats op de bank om er zich gemakkelijk op uit te strekken, vat het op alsof
’n paar voorloopige weigeringen ’n onvermijdelijk deel uitmaakten van den
gewonen gang van ’n huwelijksaanzoek). Ik heb geen haast. Ik wou u dit
alleen maar laten weten, voor ’t geval dat de jonge Gardner mocht
probeeren u te vangen. Denk er eens over na.
Vivie (scherp). Mijn neen blijft neen. Ik kom er niet op terug. (Zij ziet hem
aan van uit de hoogte. Hij grijnst; buigt zich voorover met z’n elbogen op
z’n knieën om met z’n stok naar ’n ongelukkig insect in ’t gras te prikken.
Hij kijkt haar sluw aan. Ongeduldig wendt zij zich af).
Crofts. Ik ben ’n goed beetje ouder dan u,—vijf en twintig jaar, ’n kwart
eeuw. Ik heb ’t eeuwige leven niet, en ik zal zorgen, dat u goed achterblijft,
als ik er niet meer zijn zal.
Vivie. Zelfs tegen diè verleiding ben ik bestand, Jhr. George. Gelooft u niet,
dat u beter zoudt doen met m’n antwoord te accepteeren? Er is niet de
minste kans, dat ik veranderen zal.
Crofts. Ja. Bedenk dus nou ’ns wat ’n last en explicaties ’t besparen zou,
als wij ’t heele geval onder ons hielden, om zoo te zeggen. Vraag uw
moeder maar eens of zij ’t prettig zou vinden om uitlegging van d’r zaken te
geven aan ’n totaal vreemde.
Vivie. Daar zie ik de bezwaren niet van in, nu de zaken toch aan kant zijn
gedaan en het geld belegd is.
Crofts. Wel, de kwestie is, dat ze nou niet precies als ’n zaak van den
eersten rang beschouwd wordt in mijn kringen, de voorname kringen, weet
u;—die ònze kringen zullen worden, als u anders over m’n aanzoek gaat
denken. Niet, dat er iets niet in den haak mee is, dat moet u niet denken. U
begrijpt door het feit, dat uw moeder er in is, dat ze volkomen fair en eerlijk
is. Ik heb haar jaren lang gekend en ik weet van haar, dat ze liever haar
hand zou afslaan, dan met iets te doen te hebben, wat niet heelemaal
behoorlijk is. Als u wilt zal ik er u alles van vertellen. Ik weet niet of u wel
eens ondervonden hebt, als u op reis was, hoe moeilijk ’t is, om ’n werkelijk
goèd ingericht familiehotel te vinden.
Crofts. Nu, dat is alles. Uw moeder heeft ’n zeldzame gave om die dingen
te besturen. We hebben er twee in Brussel, één in Berlijn, één in Weenen en
twee in Buda-Pest.—Natuurlijk zijn er nog anderen behalve wij in de zaak,
maar wìj hebben er het meeste kapitaal in,—en uw moeder is onmisbaar als
directrice. U hebt zeker wel gemerkt, dat zij veel reist.—Maar u begrijpt,—
over zulke dingen kun je in gezelschap niet spreken. Noem ’t woord “hotel”
maar eens en iedereen zegt, dat je ’n publiek huis houdt. U zoudt toch niet
willen, dat ze dàt van uw moeder zouden zeggen, wel? Daarom houden we
’t zoo stil. Wat ik zeggen wil, u zult ’t ook wel voòr u houden, niet? Nu ’t al
zòòlang ’n geheim is geweest, is ’t beter dat ’t dat ook blijft.
Vivie. En dit is dus de onderneming, waar u wilt, dat ik deel in zal nemen!
Crofts. Welnee. Mijn vrouw zal niets met zaken te maken hebben. U zult
er niet meer mee te maken hebben dan u altijd gedaan hebt.
Crofts. Alleen maar dat u er altijd van geleefd hebt. Ze heeft betaald voor
uw opvoeding en voor de japon die u aan uw lijf hebt. Trek uw neus maar
niet op voor zaken, juffrouw Vivie. Wat zou er van uw mooie scholen
worden zonder geld?
Vivie (staat op, half buiten zichzelf). Pas op. Ik weet wàt voor zaak ’t is.
Crofts (zwart van woede). Die ouwe.... (Vivie ziet hem haastig aan. Hij
slikt ’t woord in en staat stilletjes voor zich te razen en te vloeken. Dan
bedenkt hij zich, dat hij sympathiek moet zijn en hij neemt z’n toevlucht tot
’n edele verontwaardiging). Zij behoorde u meer te hebben ontzien. Ik zou
’t u nooit verteld hebben.
Crofts (heel oprecht). Ik had ’t nooit willen doen. Op m’n woord niet.
(Vivie ziet hem verwonderd aan. Haar gevoel voor de ironie van zijn protest
kalmeert haar en geeft haar kracht. Zij antwoordt met minachtende
zelfbeheersching.)
Vivie. ’t Doet er niet toe. Ik veronderstel dat u begrijpt, dat wanneer wij
vandaag van hier weggaan, onze kennismaking tot ’n eind komt.
Vivie. Mijn moeder was ’n arme vrouw die geen keus had om anders te
handelen dan ze gedaan heeft. Maar ù was rijk en u deed hetzelfde terwille
van 35 percent. U bent mijns inziens ’n gewone, echte schurk. Dàt is m’n
opinie van u.
Crofts (staart haar even aan,—volstrekt niet gekwetst, en veel meer op z’n
gemak, nu ze op dezen ongegeneerden voet met elkaar zijn, dan toen ze
eerst wat vormelijk waren). Ha, ha, ha, ha! ga je gang, juffie, geef er me van
langs; ’t hindert me niet en ’t amuseert me. Wat weerga, waarom zou ik m’n
geld niet op die manier beleggen? Ik neem de interest van ’n kapitaal net als
alle andere menschen. Ik hoop niet, dat je vindt, dat ik er m’n eigen handen
mee vuil maak. Zeg ’ns zelf: je zoudt toch niet weigeren om kennis te
maken met m’n moeders neef, den hertog van Belgravia, omdat sommige
van de renten, die hij ontvangt, op ’n wat wonderlijke wijze verdiend
worden? Je zoudt vermoedelijk den aartsbisschop van Canterbury niet
negeeren omdat de leden van de kerkelijke commissies enkele
kroeghouders en zondaren onder hun huurders hebben? Herinner je je de
Croftsbeurs in Newnham? Nu, die is gesticht door m’n broer, het
parlementslid. Hij krijgt z’n 22 percent van ’n fabriek met 600 meisjes,
waarvan er niet één genoeg verdient om van te leven. Hoe stel je je voor,
dat die rondscharrelen? Vraag ’t je moeder maar eens. En verwacht je dan,
dat ik bedanken zou voor 35 percent, terwijl andere menschen in hun zak
steken wàt ze maar kunnen, als verstandige lui? Zòò gek ben ik niet. Als je
je kennissen wilt kiezen en uitzoeken volgens zedelijke principes, dan kun
je ’t land wel uittrekken, tenzij je jezelf buiten de heele fatsoenlijke
maatschappij wilt houden.
Crofts. Wel, ik geloof, dat ik mezelf mag vleien, dat je beter over me
denkt, dan je eerst hebt gedaan.
Crofts (hijgend van woede). Denk je, dat ik dit alles van je verdraag, jij
kleine duivel?
Frank (met opgewekte beleefdheid). Wil jij ’t geweer hebben Viv, of zal ik
’t gebruiken?
Frank (na ’n pauze van ontdaanheid, neemt z’n geweer op). Viv, je zult
voor den rechter getuigen, dat ’t een ongeluk was. (Hij mikt op de
verdwijnende figuur van Crofts. Vivie grijpt den loop en draait die rond,
tegen haar borst aan).
Frank (laat ’t eind van z’n geweer haastig vallen). Halt! Pas op! (Zij laat ’t
gaan. ’t Valt op den grond). O, wat heb je je jongentje laten schrikken! Stel
je voor, dat ’t af was gegaan.... O! (geheel ontdaan valt hij op de bank
neer).
Vivie. Ja, stel je dat voor. Begrijp je niet, dat ’t een verlichting voor me
geweest zou zijn om ’n felle lichamelijke pijn in me te voelen scheuren?
Frank (vleiend). Trek ’t je niet zoo aan, beste Viv. Bedenk maar, dat àls
m’n geweer den vent zòò heeft verschrikt, dat hij voor ’t eerst in z’n leven
de waarheid gezegd heeft, ’t ons dan in èrnst maakt tot de babies in ’t
bosch. (Hij houdt z’n armen voor haar open). Kom, laten we ons weer
toedekken met blaâren.
Vivie (met ’n kreet van afschuw). O, dat niet, dat niet! Je laat me rillen!
Frank (opspringend). Allo! Wacht even! Viv! Viv! (Zij draait zich om bij ’t
hek). Waar ga je naar toe? Waar kan ik je vinden?
Vivie. Op Honoria Frasers kantoor, Chancery Lane 67,—voor de rest van
m’n leven. (Zij gaat heen in de tegenovergestelde richting van Crofts).
Frank. Maar hoor dan toch ’ns... wacht even... Wat drommel! (hij rent haar
achterna).
VIERDE BEDRIJF.
Frank (roept). Binnen! ’t Is niet gesloten. (Vivie komt binnen met hoed op
en mantel aan. Zij blijft staan en staart hem aan).