0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

A Review of Latency Minimization Techniques in Multimedia Cognitive Radio Networks (Recovered)

This document reviews latency minimization techniques in Multimedia Cognitive Radio Networks (CRNs), highlighting the challenges of ensuring low-latency communication for bandwidth-intensive applications. It consolidates findings from ten key research works, categorizing strategies into predictive access, scheduling, cross-layer optimization, and edge computing. The review emphasizes the need for integrated frameworks and suggests future research directions to enhance multimedia performance in dynamic spectrum environments.

Uploaded by

Rahmat minnawal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

A Review of Latency Minimization Techniques in Multimedia Cognitive Radio Networks (Recovered)

This document reviews latency minimization techniques in Multimedia Cognitive Radio Networks (CRNs), highlighting the challenges of ensuring low-latency communication for bandwidth-intensive applications. It consolidates findings from ten key research works, categorizing strategies into predictive access, scheduling, cross-layer optimization, and edge computing. The review emphasizes the need for integrated frameworks and suggests future research directions to enhance multimedia performance in dynamic spectrum environments.

Uploaded by

Rahmat minnawal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

A Review of Latency Minimization Techniques in Multimedia Cognitive Radio Networks:

Abstract

Multimedia Cognitive Radio Networks (CRNs) offer a dynamic solution to spectrum scarcity but face
critical challenges in ensuring low-latency communication for bandwidth-intensive applications such
as video streaming and conferencing. Latency arises from spectrum sensing delays, dynamic
spectrum access, and media-specific transmission constraints. This review consolidates recent
advancements from ten key research works on latency minimization techniques in multimedia
CRNs. It presents a detailed examination of the methodologies, summarizes the proposed
techniques, and concludes with a discussion on their effectiveness and implications for future
research.

1. Introduction

Cognitive Radio Networks (CRNs) enable 1. Predictive Access and Machine


opportunistic spectrum usage, making them Learning
ideal for handling the high data rate
requirements of multimedia content. This paper makes a strong case for predictive
However, the dynamic nature of spectrum modelling in CRNs. By leveraging historical
access introduces delays detrimental to data with supervised learning, the approach
quality-of-service (QoS) metrics such as sidesteps the latency overhead of real-time
latency. Researchers have explored various spectrum sensing. Its innovation lies in
strategies—ranging from predictive models to proactively determining channel availability,
edge computing—to reduce delay and which is especially effective for real-time
enhance real-time multimedia performance in media. However, the reliability of predictions
CRNs. This review highlights such techniques,
under dynamic or adversarial conditions is a
providing a review of each along with its
limitation; accuracy may degrade in highly
contribution to latency minimization.
volatile spectrum environments. Future work
might explore hybrid models combining real-
time feedback with predictions.
2. The ten reviewed papers collectively
Using SVMs for spectrum sensing improves
explore a broad spectrum of strategies aimed
upon traditional energy detection by
at minimizing latency in multimedia
transmission over Cognitive Radio Networks reducing false positives and decreasing
(CRNs). They can be thematically grouped sensing time. The paper effectively highlights
into four main categories: predictive access the trade-off between training time and
and machine learning, scheduling and runtime efficiency. Its contribution is
resource allocation, cross-layer optimization, significant for improving sensing accuracy,
and edge computing and spectrum which directly translates to lower latency.
aggregation. However, the paper could benefit from
comparing SVMs to more modern deep real deployments may hinder adoption
learning models like CNNs or LSTMs, which unless standardized APIs or middleware are
may offer superior performance on complex proposed.
signal data.
Innovatively integrating video quality metrics
into MAC-layer decisions bridges technical
QoS with user-perceived QoE (Quality of
1. Scheduling and Resource Allocation
Experience). This user-centric optimization is
The priority-aware scheduling algorithm adds a major strength. The system’s ability to
an essential QoS layer by differentiating adjust for packet importance rather than
packet types. It’s well suited to CRNs where treating all packets equally adds nuance. The
resource contention is high. This approach paper might further explore subjective
aligns with real-world multimedia needs testing or user feedback mechanisms to
where some packets (like I-frames in video) validate improvements in perceived video
are more critical. One potential concern is quality.
fairness—non-multimedia traffic might
experience starvation. An adaptive or
fairness-preserving enhancement could 3. Edge Computing and Spectrum
address this. Aggregation
By using an MDP framework for delay- Spectrum aggregation is a logical yet
sensitive resource allocation, this paper underused approach in CRNs. This paper’s
smartly models the stochastic nature of method of bonding fragmented channels into
CRNs. The probabilistic decision-making a logical stream meets the bandwidth
mechanism accounts for traffic load and demands of multimedia well. The design
channel conditions, yielding effective long- mitigates jitter and rebuffering—two critical
term delay minimization. The framework is pain points. However, it assumes relatively
theoretically robust, though practical stable availability of multiple subchannels,
implementation might be computationally which may not always hold. Techniques for
intensive, especially with a large state space. rapid aggregation reconfiguration would
Approximation techniques or reinforcement enhance its robustness.
learning could make it more scalable.
Extending the previous work, this paper’s
contribution lies in dynamic reconfiguration
of bonded channels during active sessions.
2. Cross-Layer Optimization
This capability is vital for continuity in
This paper underscores the need for inter- multimedia streams. The real-time aspect
layer coordination in CRNs. Their cross-layer distinguishes it from earlier, more static
scheme is logical and timely, particularly as aggregation methods. A potential limitation
traditional layered designs struggle under is computational complexity; the system
fast-changing network conditions. The must act quickly under pressure, which may
synchronization of parameters across MAC strain resources without dedicated hardware
and physical layers ensures more agile or optimized algorithms.
adaptation. However, the complexity of
Edge computing to offload tasks from end-
implementing such tightly coupled systems in
user devices is well-motivated, especially for
mobile users. Their system addresses  AI-based dynamic protocol stacks that
encoding and spectrum selection latency adapt to network and application
effectively. By moving heavy computation contexts.
closer to the user, the model reduces end-to-  Federated edge learning to enhance
end delay. The approach is practical and local decision-making without
scalable, especially in 5G/6G architectures. It compromising privacy.
 QoS standardization for multimedia
would be beneficial to quantify energy
CRNs, especially in heterogeneous
savings or improvements in battery life to
deployment environments.
fully showcase the edge computing
advantage.
Proactive caching is a novel and efficient way References:
to reduce initial buffering delays. Their edge-
1. Y.-H. Hsieh, C.-M. Chao, C.-Y. Lin, and
oriented content delivery system emphasizes
C.-C. Yeh, “Anti-Jamming Low-Latency
prefetching based on user behavior Channel Hopping Protocol for
predictions, which can greatly enhance the Cognitive Radio Networks,”
user experience. However, the accuracy of Electronics, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1811,
prediction models is crucial. Poor predictions Apr. 2023. (MDPI)
could lead to wasted storage or bandwidth. 2. A. Bilal, S. Latif, S. A. Ghauri, O.-Y.
Exploring federated learning or privacy- Song, A. A. Abbasi, and T. Karamat,
preserving user profiling might strengthen “Modified Heuristic Computational
this approach. Techniques for the Resource
Optimization in Cognitive Radio
3. Conclusion Networks (CRNs),” Electronics, vol. 12,
no. 4, p. 973, Apr. 2023. (MDPI)
Latency minimization in multimedia CRNs 3. M. Abdel-Malek, K. Seddik, T. ElBatt,
remains an evolving challenge due to dynamic and Y. Mohasseb, “Effective Capacity
spectrum access and heterogeneous and Delay Optimization in Cognitive
multimedia demands. The reviewed studies Radio Networks,” in Proc. 10th Int.
highlight that no single solution suffices across Conf. Cognitive Radio Oriented
all scenarios. Predictive models and machine Wireless Networks (CROWNCOM),
learning show promise in reducing sensing Doha, Qatar, Apr. 2015, pp. 23–34.
and access delays, while edge computing and (EUDL)
cross-layer optimizations offer end-to-end 4. M. A. Elhassan, M. Abd-Elnaby, S. A.
latency reductions. Spectrum aggregation El-Dolil, and F. E. Abd El-Samie,
techniques enhance throughput stability, “Throughput Maximization for
essential for real-time video. Multimedia Communication with
Cooperative Cognitive Radio Using
Adaptively Controlled Sensing Time,”
Multimedia Tools and Applications,
4. Future Directions vol. 78, no. 24, pp. 34999–35025, Dec.
2019. (SpringerLink)
Future research should focus on integrating 5. F. R. Yu, B. Sun, V. Krishnamurthy, and
these approaches into unified frameworks. S. Ali, “Application Layer QoS
Specific areas of interest include: Optimization for Multimedia
Transmission over Cognitive Radio
Networks,” Wireless Networks, vol.
17, no. 2, pp. 371–383, Feb. 2011.
(SpringerLink)
6. T. Majumder, R. K. Mishra, A. Sinha, S.
S. Singh, and P. K. Sahu, “Robust
Congestion Control in Cognitive Radio
Network Using Dynamic Event-
Triggered Sliding Mode,” Int. J.
Commun. Syst., vol. 33, no. 10, p.
e4206, Oct. 2020. (Wiley Online
Library)
7. H. Hu, H. Zhang, and H. Yu, “Efficient
Spectrum Sensing with Minimum
Transmission Delay in Cognitive Radio
Networks,” Mobile Networks and
Applications, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 487–
501, Jun. 2014. (SpringerLink)
8. A. Elnakeeb, H. Elsayed, and M.
Khairy, “Power Minimization Through
Packet Retention in Cognitive Radio
Sensor Networks Under Interference
and Delay Constraints: An Optimal
Stopping Approach,” in Proc. 10th Int.
Conf. Cognitive Radio Oriented
Wireless Networks (CROWNCOM),
Doha, Qatar, Apr. 2015, pp. 227–238.
(EUDL)
9. M. Srilatha and A. Bharathi, “Low
Access Latency and High Throughput
for Full-Duplex Cognitive Radio Using
Mobility Caching Placement Strategy,”
Advances in Technology Innovation,
vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 143–154, Mar. 2022.
(IMETI)
10. D. P. Patil and V. M. Wadhai, “Delay
Minimization Using Cognitive Radio
from Spectrum Management
Perspective,” in Proc. Int. Conf.
Computational Intelligence (ICCIA),
Mar. 2012, vol. 9, pp. 6–9. (IJCA)

You might also like