Radiology For Medical Finals 1st Edition by Edward Sellon 9781351651431 1351651439 Instant Download
Radiology For Medical Finals 1st Edition by Edward Sellon 9781351651431 1351651439 Instant Download
https://ebookball.com/product/radiology-for-medical-finals-1st-
edition-by-edward-sellon-9781351651431-1351651439-1652/
https://ebookball.com/product/pediatric-radiology-practical-
imaging-evaluation-of-infants-and-children-1st-edition-by-edward-
lee-1496380282-9781496380289-6080/
https://ebookball.com/product/rules-of-thumb-for-mechanical-
engineers-1st-edition-by-edward-pope-
isbn-9780080516479-0080516475-18836/
Top Score for the Radiology Boards 1st edition by Alan Weissman
9781638534266 1638534268
https://ebookball.com/product/top-score-for-the-radiology-
boards-1st-edition-by-alan-
weissman-9781638534266-1638534268-1684/
https://ebookball.com/product/radiology-for-undergraduates-and-
genral-practitioners-1st-edition-by-hariqbal-
singh-9350257939-978-9350257937-1638/
Clinical Manual for Oral Medicine and Radiology 1st Edition by Praveen
Ongole ISBN 9350254769 9789350254761
https://ebookball.com/product/clinical-manual-for-oral-medicine-
and-radiology-1st-edition-by-praveen-ongole-
isbn-9350254769-9789350254761-7976/
https://ebookball.com/product/thoracic-radiology-a-guide-for-
beginners-1st-edition-by-iacopo-carbone-michele-
anzidei-9783030357658-3030357651-6066/
Medical Law for the Dental Surgeon 1st edition by Paul 8180612422
9788180612428
https://ebookball.com/product/medical-law-for-the-dental-
surgeon-1st-edition-by-paul-8180612422-9788180612428-7400/
https://ebookball.com/product/frommer-s-radiology-for-the-dental-
professional-10th-edition-by-jeanine-stabulas-
savage-9780323479332-0323479332-5356/
https://ebookball.com/product/what-radiology-residents-need-to-
know-chest-radiology-1st-edition-by-ronald-
eisenberg-9783030168261-3030168263-6040/
Radiology for
Medical Finals
A case-based guide
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. While all reasonable
efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, neither the author[s] nor the publisher can
accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publishers wish
to make clear that any views or opinions expressed in this book by individual editors, authors or contributors
are personal to them and do not necessarily reflect the views/opinions of the publishers. The information or
guidance contained in this book is intended for use by medical, scientific or health-care professionals and is
provided strictly as a supplement to the medical or other professional’s own judgement, their knowledge of the
patient’s medical history, relevant manufacturer’s instructions and the appropriate best practice guidelines.
Because of the rapid advances in medical science, any information or advice on dosages, procedures or diagnoses
should be independently verified. The reader is strongly urged to consult the relevant national drug formulary
and the drug companies’ and device or material manufacturers’ printed instructions, and their websites, before
administering or utilizing any of the drugs, devices or materials mentioned in this book. This book does not
indicate whether a particular treatment is appropriate or suitable for a particular individual. Ultimately it is the
sole responsibility of the medical professional to make his or her own professional judgements, so as to advise
and treat patients appropriately. The authors and publishers have also attempted to trace the copyright holders
of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this
form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know
so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted,
or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, includ-
ing photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, w ithout
w ritten permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com
(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive,
Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registra-
tion for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate
system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
To my dear wife Lara and all the children, Thomas, Ella, Robert and Miles,
also to my parents, Ken and Margaret, and remembering fondly
Joanna and Christopher (DCH)
5 Thoracic cases 51
HANNAH ADAMS, SARAH HANCOX, CRISTINA RUSCANU, AND DAVID C HOWLETT
Bibliography 555
List of cases 557
Index 559
From the initial discovery of X-rays and their application to medical imaging by Wilhelm Röntgen,
imaging has been an increasingly vital part of medical practice. The modern doctor needs a strong
understanding of the different modalities and their application in the diagnosis and management
of a wide range of medical conditions. While in many situations images are reported by expert
radiologists, the ability to understand and interpret radiological images is essential and the vast
majority of medical schools will require students to demonstrate fundamental skills in this area.
More importantly, diagnostic and therapeutic imaging opens a window to the internal struc-
ture and function of the human body and links the fundamental sciences of anatomy, physiol-
ogy, and pathology to the patient as a whole presenting with symptoms and signs of disease.
The clues gleaned from a careful history and thorough examination lead us to select the most
appropriate investigations to expedite a diagnosis, allowing us to inform the patient about their
condition and commence appropriate treatment. It is the distinction between normal and abnor-
mal structure and function, which is at the core of radiological diagnosis, that provides an illus-
trative basis for learning and a truly patient-orientated understanding of medical disorders. As
such, the use of radiology in teaching and learning facilitates and enhances the understanding
of medicine and is of enormous benefit in preparing for examinations such as medical school
Finals. This textbook edited by Edward Sellon and David Howlett provides an invaluable learn-
ing resource not just for students preparing for medical school Finals but any doctor preparing
for subsequent professional assessments. In addition to the well-illustrated cases and a use-
ful introduction to OSCE-style exams, the real value in this text is in the clearly structured
cases based on high-quality radiological imaging, which span the whole spectrum of medicine.
The book takes a regional anatomy approach with additional chapters on the normal chest and
abdominal X-rays and paediatric cases.
The contributors and editors are to be commended for producing a high-quality, com-
prehensive compilation of cases with clear and concise questions, answers, and explanatory
notes. I would commend this text book to its target audience of final year medical students but
also to doctors in training in a wide range of clinical disciplines as well as those in established
practice.
ix
Radiology is an unusual medical discipline in being able to trace its origin precisely to a specific
event – the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Röntgen in 1895. The practice of medicine was trans-
formed almost overnight by the use of X-rays in diagnosis. The development of further imaging
techniques such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) followed in the second half of the twentieth century and has led to medical imaging occu-
pying a central place in the management of patients with a very wide range of conditions.
Whatever branch of medicine you pursue as a career, at some stage you will find that an under-
standing of medical images – X-rays and scans – will be essential to your work. You will need to
understand not only the principles of interpretation of tests such as the chest X-ray but also their
strengths and limitations and how to make the best use of these tests to benefit your patients.
Although imaging findings can occasionally be so characteristic that they could almost be
called “pathognomonic”, one of the most important lessons that you will learn is that the inter-
pretation of an imaging test depends critically on the clinical context. The classic diagnostic
sequence – history, examination, tests – is as valid today as it ever has been, despite the increas-
ing sophistication of the imaging tests. The doctor who makes a diagnosis based only on imaging
findings without due regard to the clinical context is more than likely to be tripped up.
Radiology is not a discipline that can be learned in isolation from clinical medicine. In this
book, David Howlett, Edward Sellon, and their colleagues, renowned educators in this field, have
therefore embedded the teaching of radiology in a series of clinical cases, which illustrate not only
the specific imaging findings in certain conditions but, importantly, the principles that underpin
the effective use of imaging tests in clinical practice.
Although there are encouraging signs with the establishment of undergraduate radiology
societies in many medical schools, the teaching of radiology to undergraduates has not always
kept up with the progress in medical imaging. I believe that this book will prove invaluable, not
only in preparing students for medical Finals, but also in giving them a better understanding of
the central role of imaging in modern clinical management, which will serve them well in the
early years of their careers as doctors. Maybe some will even be inspired to consider a future
career in this most exciting and rapidly developing discipline.
xi
This book has been a long time in the making and is the product of many years of both teaching
and examining undergraduate medical students. Over this time there has been an exponential
increase in the use of all forms of imaging in both acute and elective patient care and this has been
reflected in undergraduate medical school curricula and also examinations. Radiology images
feature prominently in both Finals written papers and Objective Structured Clinical Examination
(OSCE), and whole OSCE stations may be based upon a chest X-ray for example. Various imag-
ing modalities tend to feature, in particular X-rays of the chest, abdomen, and common fractures,
but increasingly CT and MR images. The incorporation of radiology/imaging into Finals reflects
the increasing exposure of both medical students and junior doctors to all forms of radiology and
the requirement for trainees to be able to provide provisional interpretation of many forms of
imaging.
This book is not intended to be an all-encompassing textbook of radiology, and the bibliog-
raphy provides supplementary reading for those who wish to dig deeper. A case-based approach
has been adopted and radiology images in questions have been selected in two broad categories –
those that students could expect to encounter in Finals or, alternatively, to cover key learning
points/educational aspects of radiology. This structure should allow students and also foundation
doctors to approach both Finals and the foundation years with more confidence.
Inevitably within the book there is a strong emphasis on plain film interpretation, as these
investigations are the most common form of imaging that students and junior doctors will
encounter and they will also often be expected to provide a provisional interpretation. Extensive
additional examples are used in case answer sections to explain and reinforce learning points
throughout the book. There is widespread use also of common/important CT/MR images, again
because these modalities are increasingly frontline; for example, CT head interpretation in stroke
care. There is less emphasis on ultrasound and nuclear medicine, as these modalities occur less
frequently in Finals, although an understanding of their use is necessary. Ultrasound does feature
in some cases reflecting more widespread use of this modality on the wards and in the emergency
department.
We hope you will enjoy this book and that it will stimulate and enhance your knowledge and
understanding of radiology, and improve your confidence in image interpretation.
Edward Sellon
David C Howlett
xiii
Dr Faye Cuthbert MBBS, MRCP, FRCR Dr Sean Mitchell BMBS, BSc (Hons)
Consultant Urogenital Radiologist General Practitioner Specialty Trainee Year 2
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals
NHS Trust, Brighton, UK NHS Trust
Honorary Clinical Teaching Fellow
Dr Sarah Hancox MBBS, BSc (Hons)
Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Resident Medical Officer, Emergency
Brighton, UK
Department
Townsville Hospital, Townsville Dr Cristina Ruscanu MBBS
Queensland, Australia Foundation Year 2 Doctor
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Dr Vincent G Helyar MBBS, BSc, MSc,
Eastbourne, UK
FRCR, EBIR
Interventional Radiology Fellow Lt Col Edward Sellon BSc (Hons),
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust MBBS, MRCS, FRCR, PgD (SEM),
London, UK Dip (ESSR), RAMC
Consultant Musculoskeletal Radiologist
Professor David C Howlett MBBS, PhD,
Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford
FAcadMEd, FRCP (London), FRCP
and
(Edinburgh), FRCR
Consultant Military Radiologist
Consultant Radiologist
Centre for Defence Radiology
Eastbourne Hospital, East Sussex Healthcare
Birmingham, UK
NHS Trust, Eastbourne
and Dr Lucy Shimwell MB BCh, BAO
Honorary Clinical Professor Resident Medical Officer
Brighton and Sussex Medical School Royal Perth Hospital, Perth
Brighton, UK Western Australia, Australia
xv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Two people in particular have been fundamental to the successful production of this book.
Nick Taylor, medical photographer, has worked tirelessly and with great skill preparing the
images, which are such a vital component of any book on imaging. Also Susi Arjomand who has,
with her customary patience and attention to detail, typed up the numerous editing iterations of
the manuscript. Thank you both.
The editors would also like to thank Jo Koster, commissioning editor at Taylor Francis, for her
support and guidance throughout the publishing process. Dr Gillian Watson and Dr Justin Harris
kindly provided some of the radiological images used in the text and Kirstie Leach also helped
with manuscript preparation.
Finally, we would like to gratefully acknowledge all the book’s contributors for their hard work
and enthusiasm, and for finding the time to prepare their cases amidst busy schedules.
xvi
xvii
xviii
xix
It is helpful for finals to have an understanding of the core imaging modalities you are likely
to encounter and to have an idea of the relative strengths/weaknesses and indications/
contraindications for each.
ADVANTAGES
• Inexpensive.
• Usually quick to perform.
• Painless, noninvasive.
• Good diagnostic tool for many pathologies.
DISADVANTAGES
• Soft tissue, lung, bone resolution much reduced compared with CT/magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI).
• Provides a two-dimensional (2D), single image only.
• Radiation exposure.
AXR
• Abdomen – bowel obstruction, perforated viscus (erect CXR more sensitive), ingested
foreign body, abdominal pain in the emergency setting.
• Pelvic – pelvic fracture, neck of femur fracture.
Bone XR
• Limbs – trauma, fractures, skeletal survey, acutely swollen joint, osteomyelitis, septic
arthritis, bone pain, tumour/metastasis.
• Skulls – skeletal survey, myeloma, dental imaging.
• Spine – trauma, scoliosis.
ULTRASOUND
Ultrasound (US) uses sound waves of high frequencies, which are emitted towards the studied
tissues and are reflected/echoed back to the probe depending on the tissue density and composi-
tion. This signal is then translated into an US image. US is a ‘live’ imaging modality and requires
interpretation while the investigation is being carried out. US colour Doppler techniques are used
to assess moving blood and are used in vascular assessment, e.g. carotid stenosis.
ADVANTAGES
• No radiation, noninvasive (some US is performed using endocavity probes, e.g. transrectal,
transvaginal, transoesophageal).
• Real-time assessment and interpretation of results.
• Relatively inexpensive.
• Useful for imaging of soft tissue and muscles, extremities, testes, breast, and eye, plus
abdomen, pelvis, chest, and vascular colour Doppler applications.
DISADVANTAGES
• Requires a skilled practitioner with US interpretation skills, operator dependent.
• No use for bone imaging as sound is attenuated/absorbed by bone.
• Images are degraded by gas and fat, and this restricts US use in the abdomen/pelvis in
some patients.
INDICATIONS
• Abdomen – trauma, malignancy, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surveillance,
gallstones, suspected hydronephrosis.
• Chest – assessment of pleural spaces.
• Musculoskeletal – assessment of muscles, ligaments, and tendons.
• Scrotal – assessment of testicles, epididymis, and scrotum.
• Obstetrics – growth scans, placental sighting, anomaly scans.
• Gynaecology – transabdominal and transvaginal imaging of ovaries, uterus, and Fallopian tubes.
• Baby hips.
• Breast, eye assessment.
• Vascular applications – suspected upper/lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT), carotid/
peripheral vascular assessment.
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
CT uses X-rays, which are emitted from a rotating X-ray source around the patient with mul-
tiple detectors to produce a series of 2D axial images of the studied body part. This can then be
computer-reconstructed to obtain axial, coronal, sagittal 2D, and three-dimensional (3D) images
of the studied body parts. There are other imaging modalities that make use of CT imaging such
as positron emission tomography (PET scan).
ADVANTAGES
• Provides 2D cross-sectional images of the body, which are rapidly acquired with the
potential to reformat in multiple planes; 3D reformatting is also possible.
• Provides a detailed image of the studied body part and the surrounding tissue.
• High sensitivity and specificity in particular for assessment of the lungs, mediastinum,
bones, abdomen/pelvis structures, the brain – especially acute blood.
DISADVANTAGES
• CT scanners are expensive.
• Moderate to high dose of radiation, depending on areas scanned.
• May require intravenous (IV) iodinated contrast use – risk of contrast reaction (allergy,
anaphylaxis) and nephrotoxicity in those at risk.
INDICATIONS
• Head – trauma, brain imaging (ischaemic/haemorrhagic strokes, calcifications,
haemorrhage, malignancy).
• Chest – detailed imaging of the lungs to detect abnormalities not seen on CXR, used
in diagnosis and surveillance of malignancy, pulmonary embolism (CT pulmonary
angiogram: CTPA), emphysema, fibrosis. Cardiac – CT to image coronary arteries.
• Abdomen and pelvis – diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of malignancies, bowel
obstruction, AAA, pancreatitis, renal calculi (CT kidneys ureters and bladder [CT KUB] and
CT IV urogram [CT IVU]).
• CT angiography and venography – for example, suspected limb or mesenteric vascular
occlusion, sagittal sinus thrombosis.
• Orthopaedic – complex fractures.
• CT-guided biopsy, surgery, and radiosurgery.
ADVANTAGES
• No ionising radiation exposure.
• Provides 2D and 3D cross-sectional images of the body.
• Superior to other imaging modalities in obtaining high-resolution images of the brain and
musculoskeletal system.
• Ideal for soft tissue structures, cartilage, and ligament imaging.
• Vascular and cardiac applications.
DISADVANTAGES
• Expensive equipment – the most expensive imaging modality.
• Time consuming, requiring patient cooperation, ability to lie still, often for 30–60 minutes.
• Contraindicated in patients with ferrous metal implants – pacemakers, cochlear implants,
metallic foreign bodies in the eyes.
• MRI is undertaken in a relatively enclosed space – unsuitable for patients with
claustrophobia and young children (may need general anaesthesia).
• Relatively contraindicated in pregnancy, particularly first trimester.
INDICATIONS
• Head and neck – neuroimaging – clear differentiation between the grey and white
matter, diagnosis of demyelinating disease, cerebrovascular disease, detailed imaging of
malignancies and infectious diseases, epilepsy imaging, functional MRI brain studies.
CT is more accurate in the detection of acute blood; new MRI techniques, e.g. diffusion
weighting, can detect cerebral ischaemia very early (minutes) when compared with CT.
• Spine imaging – nerve compression (cord and cauda equina), malignancies, disc disease.
• Hepatobiliary – liver, pancreas, and biliary lesions, MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)
for structural imaging of the biliary tree.
• Small bowel – Crohn’s disease diagnosis.
• Knee and other joints – used in cartilage and ligament imaging.
• Angiographic, vascular protocols, cardiac MRI.
• Prostate imaging, diagnosis, and staging of prostate cancer.
• Rectal, gynaecological cancer staging.
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Nuclear medicine uses injected (or inhaled) radioactive isotopes to diagnose or treat many con-
ditions: endocrine, heart, and gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It images the emission of isotope
radiation from within the body and can construct a 2D/3D image of the areas of the radioactive
substance uptake. It is used for functional imaging, rather than structural imaging, as contrast/
spatial resolution is poor. Some nuclear medicine is combined with CT/MRI to improve anatomi-
cal detail.
IMAGING MODALITIES
• Myocardial perfusion scan – assessment of the function of myocardium for diagnosis
of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease, in combination with
MRI +/– CT.
• Genitourinary scan – assessment of renal blood flow and function, evaluate renovascular
hypertension, and assess vesicoureteral reflux.
• Bone imaging – assessment of bone metastases, infection.
• PET – imaging of metastases, neuroimaging – imaging of brain activity in dementias,
combining injection of metabolically active substances, e.g. fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and
tomography/CT detection.
ADVANTAGES
• Provides functional information of organs and disease processes.
• Advancement of treatment options for cancer patients.
• Allows early or improved detection of metastases (PET).
• Provides detailed and accurate information in hard to reach areas.
• Radioisotopes are used to treat some cancers, e.g. radioiodine and papillary thyroid
cancer.
DISADVANTAGES
• High cost.
• Exposure to radiation doses, which may be significant, e.g. PET.
• Not all techniques are widely available, e.g. PET.
FLUOROSCOPY TECHNIQUES
Fluoroscopy combines ionising radiation from X-ray exposure with administration (ingested/
injected) of contrast medium, which is then imaged passing through the structures/organs of
interest to assess their function and structure in real time. Examples include:
• Contrast swallow – assessment of the structure and function of the pharynx and
oesophagus (largely replaced by oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy [OGD]).
• Barium follow through – assessment of the structure and function of the small bowel
(MRI small bowel replacing).
• Contrast enema – assessment of structure and function of the large bowel and rectum
(colonoscopy replacing), used particularly to evaluate the integrity of postoperative bowel
anastomoses.
• Tubogram (hysterosalpingography) – assessment of the shape of the uterine cavity and the
shape and patency of the Fallopian tubes.
• Arteriogram, venogram (CT/MRI replacing).
ADVANTAGES
• Allow a ‘live’ assessment.
• Relatively inexpensive, readily available.
• Relatively noninvasive.
DISADVANTAGES
• Exposure to ionising radiation, which may be significant, e.g. barium enema.
• Poor soft tissue resolution.
• Endoscopy techniques are more accurate in bowel mucosal assessment and allow tissue
biopsies.
2 Examination
THOMAS KURKA
The OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) is designed to test clinical and communi-
cation skills in a structured environment in real time. Many medical schools use the ‘integrated
station’ approach in their OSCE exams, which means that you may be asked to take a focused his-
tory, do a part of a clinical examination, and interpret a test result all in one station. This tests your
knowledge, skills, and your thinking process towards reaching a working diagnosis. Remember
that most people pass their OSCE and you are allowed to fail a small proportion of the stations –
your medical school will be able to advise on the specific rules of the exam.
• Read the OSCE station instructions properly and follow the script – this ensures you stay
on the topic of the OSCE station and will earn you points. If the station says take a history
from the patient you will not score any points on educating or advising the patient. Stay
focused on the tasks specified in your station brief.
• Begin every station with a polite introduction of yourself. Knock on the door before
entering and say hello with a smile on your face (even a nervous smile counts). Introduce
yourself with a full name and your role, and do not forget to articulate. Most feedback
from the patients from OSCE stations was that they could not understand the students’
names and introduction because they spoke too fast as they were nervous. Be the one to be
remembered for appearing calm, with a smile on your face and a clear introduction.
• Ask your patient’s permission to take their history and/or examine them – there is a mark
for gaining a verbal consent.
• Follow up with letting the patient tell you their story – this will allow you to have a minute
to catch your breath and to connect with the patient.
• Finally, the staff who are examining you want you to pass and you need to give them the
opportunity to give you the points!
It is important to acknowledge their worries and concerns directly, even if you need to
divert to continue gathering the essential information for your history. Sometimes patients
can talk for a long time and go off the topic, and it is your job to politely interrupt them,
acknowledge you will return to their point, and only then divert to what you want to talk
about. You need to appear to be in control but do it politely.
• The examiner will nudge you if you start slowing down or diverge from the main topic or
time is running short. Take the hint as they are trying to set you back on the right path, the
path of the marking sheet.
• Avoid talking too much. It can be tempting to try to talk a lot to show you know your
subject but remember this is a two-way discussion, not a monologue. This applies mainly to
communication stations when you are asked to explain a procedure, counsel the patient or
discuss a new treatment. It is tempting to quickly say everything you know about the subject
to impress your examiner but remember this is about giving information to the patient who
needs to understand it, be able to ask questions, and share their point of view with you.
COMMUNICATION STATIONS
• Communication stations are those where you are asked to discuss a certain treatment or
procedure with a patient, to break bad news or to deal with a complaint.
• Practice communication stations with your friends and colleagues.
• Many medical schools use communication stations in their finals OSCE. Commonly the
instructions prior to entering the communication stations will be very brief, allowing
consultation for the full time of the station. This can be both an advantage and a
disadvantage, as you need to be very organised to structure your discussion to fill the time
and cover the most important areas.
• It is crucial to have a general structure on how to approach any station. There are a number
of structures that ensure you are able to obtain and give all the necessary information about
any topic and allow for a two-way discussion. Prior to entering the examining room decide
which structure you are going to use. For example, when asked to explain a procedure,
discuss a new treatment or counsel a patient, always start by gaining permission to discuss
the topic with your patient: ‘I am here to talk to you about X, would it be OK?’ This is
usually followed by, ‘What do you know about X?’ By asking this question, you gain the
patient’s understanding, perceptions, and concerns about the topic. This often provides
the narrative you should use to elaborate on. Always ensure you pause regularly and check
the patient’s understanding and give time for questions. You have to address all of their
concerns and answer all their questions by the end of the station. It is good practice to start
winding down in the last minute of the station, recap all of the important points, and allow
for final questions.
• Remember you cannot know everything and it is important to admit it. It is appropriate
to say that you do not know but you would check with your senior and tell the patient later.
By doing this, you show that you understand your limitations and that you will be a safe
practitioner.
• It may happen that the station instructions ask you to discuss a topic you have absolutely no
knowledge about. Do not panic! In such situations, remember that following a script could
get you out of trouble. Allow the patient to tell you what they know about the topic, which
may trigger some of your knowledge. Be honest and acknowledge that this is a topic you do
not know a great deal about but state that you will find out. Also, if you find yourself totally
lost and have no more to talk about, remember to consider the patient’s ideas, concerns, and
expectations (ICE). One tip would be to discuss the patient’s social support – do they have a
partner, family or friends who they could talk to or get help from? Would they benefit from
counselling, group sessions or further information from the Internet or leaflets? Do they have
a general practitioner (GP) with whom they would feel comfortable discussing this further?
This not only keeps the conversation going but it shows that you understand that difficult life
situations and decisions require support from those who are closest to the patient.
• Sometimes you may encounter a difficult conversation station such as an angry patient or
relative, or having to break bad news. Many students feel that they have to show knowledge
of the topic to score all the points but often the main point is to be empathetic, respond to
the patients’ concerns, allow them to express their feelings and emotions, and remember
that the use of silence in difficult conversations can be exactly what the patient needs.
• Practice breaking bad news with your friends and colleagues before your OSCE. It is often
uncomfortable to be silent through a stressful or a sad discussion but it is important to use
silence at the right moment. The more you practice, the easier it becomes.
EXAMINATION STATIONS
• Practice examination stations with your friends and colleagues.
• Always gain an informed consent from your patient.
• Never hurt your patient during a physical examination. It is important to ask about pain
before your examination. Always check with the patient if you are causing them discomfort
during the examination and warn the patient if you have cold hands before you touch them!
10
• Read your instructions clearly to understand which part of the body you are supposed to
examine. If it says to examine the cardiovascular system, than start at the bottom of the bed
with general inspection, moving onto the hands, face, neck, etc. If it says to examine the
precordium, then you are only being asked to concentrate on the chest. If in doubt, always
ask the examiner to clarify the instructions for you.
• Be systematic! You need to develop a sequence by which you can examine any body system.
The general rule is to OBSERVE, PERCUSS/PALPATE, AUSCULTATE/MOVE. You can
examine somebody’s shoulder by following the sequence of observe, palpate, and move
even if you cannot remember precisely how to do it.
• Students are never sure whether to narrate during the examination or not. Some medical
schools have specific rules about this and you should follow them. A rule of thumb is to
narrate only those parts of the examination that are not obvious to the examiner. For
example, when you are inspecting the hands during an abdominal examination, you should
comment on nicotine tar staining, clubbing, palmar erythema, etc. If you did not narrate
this part and the examiner had a separate point for each of these findings on their scoring
sheet, it would be difficult to award you all the points. On the other hand, if you were
auscultating the heart, the examiner can see the areas that you are auscultating and you
would not need to state this. However, you would need to state your findings with regard to
heart sounds.
• Avoid saying, ‘I am looking for...’ because this does not inform the examiner whether
you found it or not. You should always say, ‘There is no pitting oedema of the legs’ rather
than, ‘I am looking for leg oedema.’
• Practice summarising your examination findings in three succinct sentences. You do not
need to state everything. Unless you found any peripheral signs of a disease, it is perfectly
acceptable to say that there were no peripheral signs of disease. You have to mention all
your positive findings. For example: ‘I performed a full cardiovascular examination on
Mr X, a 35-year-old male who had no peripheral signs of cardiovascular disease. His blood
pressure was 135/70 mmHg with a regular pulse of 70 bpm, heart sounds one and two were
audible with no additional sounds, and his lung bases were clear. I would conclude this to
be a normal cardiovascular examination.’
• Practice using instruments. It is easy to spot a student who has never held a patellar
hammer or ophthalmoscope in their hand. When practicing for your OSCE, make sure you
have all the required equipment and you practice using it.
• Use alcohol gel when practicing examination stations with your colleagues. It is an easy
point on the mark scheme to gain and many students forget to use it because of stress.
Use it in your practice time to ensure it becomes second nature. You should gel your hands
before examining your patient and again after, just before leaving the room.
• If you find something abnormal during your OSCE examination and you cannot remember
what it is, what it is called or what sign of disease it represents, describe it to the examiner
in your own words and say that you recognise this as abnormal but you cannot remember
what it signifies. Also offer to seek advice from senior colleagues; this will demonstrate that
you are safe, and there are usually OSCE points for stating this.
• Do not forget to look around the bedside. Some patients may have a walking stick, inhaler,
glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) spray, glasses or hearing aids on the table. These are there to give
you a hint; take it!
11
• Often, if there is something on the patent’s table in the OSCE station, it is there to be used.
If you were asked to examine the thyroid gland, make sure you use the glass of water on
their table to assess swallowing. If you were to examine someone’s hands, make sure you
use the 50p coin on the table to observe grip and dexterity.
• Always thank the patient afterwards. In many stations the examiner will ask for the
opinion of the actor with regard to how you treated them and your general demeanour.
Patient opinion does not usually attract marks but will add to the overall impression of the
examiner. Often patients are volunteering their services, especially if they are real patients,
and although you are only doing the station once they will be repeating it with nervous
students multiple times. A kind word and a smile will go a long way.
12
• Imaging in the exam is covered in detail throughout the book and may occur in the OSCE
or the written papers. Imaging pathology will be clearly apparent and the image is usually
nonadjustable on the computer screen. Having a clear method and approach to image
presentation is essential and will reassure the examiner that you have seen/presented
imaging many times in the past.
FINAL WORDS
• Practice ... practice ... practice: be systematic, practice more, and remember to be seen to
wash your hands as needed. Do not panic because by the time you undergo your OSCE
exams you should have a system to tackle any problem, practice again, smile, and be kind to
your patients.
• Do not rely on books only to prepare for OSCE. You must get involved in regular group
revision.
• Eat healthily, keep hydrated, exercise, and get some quality sleep during your revision
period.
• Allow yourself some downtime to relax. Watch some television, visit friends, play your
favourite sport, go for walks or anything else you used to do before you started this
revision. Do not allow it to completely take over your life but at the same time make it your
priority.
• Remember, there is light at the end of the tunnel and the skills you are learning now are
genuinely useful for the future.
• Most people pass!
13
3 THOMAS KURKA
The CXR is the most common radiological investigation performed. Interpretation can be dif-
ficult and often falls initially to those with relatively limited experience. It is important to have a
systematic approach to interpretation to ensure that the correct diagnosis is made and nothing is
missed. This will help both in the examination situation and in real life.
This chapter provides a step-by-step approach to reviewing the CXR. It provides a compre-
hensive problem-solving technique, which encourages a set format involving an introduction, a
detailed assessment of the key abnormality, and a systematic review of the rest of the film. It is
this systematic review that students have most difficulty with and we provide two different tech-
niques for dealing with it. We then illustrate these techniques with example cases.
15
Diagnoses Symptoms
Respiratory Malignancy (primary or secondary) Haemoptysis
Infection – pneumonia, TB Dyspnoea
Pulmonary embolism Chest pain
Pleural effusion Productive cough
Inhaled foreign body Severe abdominal pain
Chest trauma
Pneumothorax
Acute exacerbation of asthma
Acute exacerbation of COPD
Cardiac Heart failure
Heart murmurs
Surgical Pneumoperitoneum
Other NG tube position
Central venous catheter position
The lifetime risk of developing cancer is influenced by the dose and cumulative exposure
to radiation. According to the Royal College of Radiologists, exposures of less than 1 mSv
(equivalent to 70 CXR or 6 months of background radiation) confer a cancer development risk
of less than 1:20,000. This rises to about 1:4,000 for 5 mSv and 1:2,000 for 10 mSv exposures.
The risk ratio, however, is heavily influenced by age and sex, with infants and females at the
greatest risk. The risk of a medical exposure, however, should always be put into the context of
the population cancer risk (currently 1 in 3 in the UK) and be balanced against the investiga-
tion benefits.
Each of us is exposed daily to background radiation from the earth and space. The background
radiation in the UK is around 2.2 mSv per year with a regional variation of as much as 1.5–7.5 mSv
per year depending largely on rock type (notably granite in the Aberdeen area and the rocks of
Cornwall). In addition, we expose ourselves to further radiation during air flight. A return flight
from London, UK to New York, USA adds approximately 0.1 mSv radiation exposure, which is
equivalent to seven CXRs.
ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) is an American safety principle and regulatory
requirement, which sets standards for a reasonable level of radiation exposure. The main princi-
ples are time (minimising the time of direct exposure), distance (double the distance, quarter the
dose), and shielding (using absorbent materials to reduce radiation exposure). Table 3.2 illustrates
the associated radiation dose of some common imaging tests with the equivalent dose in CXR or
background radiation.
16
Equivalent period
Equivalent of background
Modality DOSE (mSv) in CXRs radiation
CXR 0.015 1 2.5 days
AXR 0.4 30 2 months
XR pelvis 0.3 20 1.5 months
XR skull 0.07 5 12 days
XR hip 0.8 60 4 months
XR hand/foot <0.001 <1 <2 days
XR cervical spine 0.05 3 7.5 days
XR thoracic spine 0.4 30 2 months
XR lumbar spine 0.6 40 3 months
CT head 1.4 90 7.5 months
CT chest 6.6 440 3 years
CT abdomen 5.6 370 2.5 years
CT abdomen/pelvis 6.7 450 3 years
CT chest/abdomen/pelvis 10 670 4.5 years
CT KUB 5.5 370 2.5 years
CT colonography 10 670 4.5 years
Barium swallow 1.5 100 8 months
Barium meal 2.0 130 11 months
Barium enema 2.2 150 1 year
Bone (Tc-99m) scan 3.0 200 1.4 years
DEXA scan 0.0004 <1 <2 days
Mammogram 0.5 35 3 months
PET scan 18 1200 8.1 years
First, you need to introduce the CXR by checking the projection of the image and men-
tioning any available personal demographic information (i.e. ‘This is a PA CXR of an adult
female.’). It is really important to check you are reviewing the correct CXR for the correct
patient, and from the correct date and time. In the exam you will not be able to do this as
the XR should be anonymised but mention to the examiner that you would wish to do this
as part of your usual practice. Then consider its technical quality (i.e. ‘There is no rotation,
and inspiration and penetration are adequate.’). This ensures that any visible abnormality is
17
likely to be related to pathology rather than an artefact of the film. Exam XRs should not have
any technical issues.
Second, describe any obvious abnormality in terms of what and where.
Third, a systematic review of the entire CXR is required to make sure that you have not missed
anything. Two different approaches to this (ABCDE or anatomical) are discussed below. Finally,
summarise your findings, give a diagnosis or differential diagnosis, and recommend further
management.
These three stages of reporting will now be discussed in greater detail.
INTRODUCTION
A number of factors should be considered for PPP.
PPP
Projection
• Pay attention to letters PA (posteroanterior) or AP (anteroposterior) on the CXR and also
the words erect or supine (Figure 3.1).
• A standard CXR is taken in a PA, erect position (i.e. the patient is standing up with
shoulders internally rotated, hands on hips, which moves the scapulae laterally so they are
less visible on the film). If it is not labelled, this is the default position.
• AP films are taken for patients that are difficult to mobilise and/or very unwell and may be
labelled portable where the patient is sat up in bed with the film cassette tucked behind them.
• AP films have more of the scapulae projected over the chest. They also have a more
prominent cardiac silhouette, which can be misinterpreted as cardiomegaly. Only assess
heart size on a PA projection (Figure 3.1).
PA AP
Fig. 3.1 The size of the heart on the PA and AP CXR. Note on PA projection that the heart is closer to the
X-ray film and thus less magnified by the divergent beam than on the AP view.
18
• Other projections are available (i.e. lateral, lordotic, apical, rotated, and oblique) but they
have been almost entirely replaced by the use of CT. You will not see these projections in
medical school exams.
RIP
Rotation
• To assess for rotation, find the medial heads of the clavicles and compare their distances
away from the spinous process of the adjacent vertebral body (Figures 3.3 and 3.4).
• If the spinous process of the vertebral body is equidistant between both clavicle heads then
there is no rotation.
• If the gap is less on the right then the patient is rotated to the right, and vice versa.
Inspiration
• Patients are asked to breathe in and hold their breath when a CXR is taken so that the lungs
are optimally visualised.
• Poor inspiratory effort may be caused by pain, confusion or respiratory distress.
19
20
• Hyperexpanded lungs may be seen in COPD patients with obstructive airway disease.
The diaphragms will appear flattened.
• Inspiratory effort is described as adequate when 9–11 posterior or 5–7 anterior ribs are seen.
Penetration
• The vertebral bodies should just be visible behind the heart for adequate penetration.
• If the CXR is either over- or underpenetrated, then you will not be able to fully assess all
the structures and compare their densities accurately.
• An underpenetrated XR appears overly opaque/dense/white.
• An overpenetrated XR appears too lucent/dark/black.
WHAT
• Shape: describe the shape of the abnormality (round, diffuse, well/poorly demarcated).
• Size: describe size of lesion.
• Density: say if it is hypo- (dark) or hyperdense (bright) compared with the surrounding
soft tissues, also if it is homogeneous (same density throughout) or heterogeneous (various
densities). Cavitating lesions have a soft tissue rim with a hypodense core and may contain
an air/fluid level. Is there calcium or fat density associated?
• Associated factors: presence of lung oedema, fluid level or air bronchogram. For pleural
effusions, describe which side is affected, comment on the presence of a meniscus and how
high the fluid level extends.
WHERE
• Site: say which lung is affected.
• Site: describe whether it is in the upper, middle or lower zone of the lung. This is much
easier than trying to assess which lobe is involved, this may be difficult to evaluate on the
frontal XR.
• Pneumonia: mostly unilateral, patchy, soft tissue consolidation. Look for air bronchograms.
• Pulmonary oedema: mostly bilateral, patchy, soft tissue consolidation with associated
cardiomegaly and pleural effusions (Table 3.3).
• Pleural effusion: mostly unilateral, homogeneous, soft tissue opacification. Blunting of
costo- and cardiophrenic angles with a meniscus at the air–fluid level.
• Pneumothora: loss of lung markings in the lateral aspect of the thorax with a visible pleural line.
• Tension pneumothorax: as above with mediastinal and/or tracheal shift away from the
pneumothorax and flattening of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm.
• Lobar collapse: mediastinal and/or tracheal shift towards the collapse, raised ipsilateral
diaphragm, displaced hilum, and rib space narrowing.
21
ABCDE APPROACH
Airway
• Trachea should be central. Deviation to the right may be related to ipsilateral lung
volume loss (lung or lobar collapse) or contralateral volume expansion (pneumothorax,
haemothorax, pleural effusion or large lung mass). It may also be deviated by a mediastinal
mass (thyroid goitre).
• Free gas in the soft tissues (surgical emphysema) secondary to penetrating trauma or severe
asthma.
• Neck masses, such as an enlarged thyroid goitre or calcified vascular calcification (subclavian
aneurysm), may be visible.
Breathing
• Lung apices should be compared. They should be symmetrical and have a similar density –
take care here as pathology in the apices can easily be missed!
• Upper, middle, and lower zones. Follow the lateral borders down to the bases and then up
towards the hila. Compare both sides (Figure 3.5).
• Pneumothorax. Close inspection of the lateral borders of each lung for a visible pleural line
and rim of absent lung markings. If you are shown a pneumothorax in the exam it will
usually be large and clearly demonstrated – small, subtle lesions will not be used.
22
Fig. 3.5 Airway and breathing structures on CXR. Trachea (1), carina (2), right hilum (3), left hilum (4), right
costophrenic angle (5), left costophrenic angle (6), right cardiophrenic angle (7), left cardiophrenic angle (8).
Note bilateral, normal, symmetrical breast outlines (9).
• Pleural angles. The costophrenic and cardiophrenic angles are checked for blunting and
increased density, as seen with consolidation (pneumonia), pleural effusion or chronic
pleural thickening.
• Hilar position, shape, and density. The left should sit at the same level or slightly higher
than the right. The hila are made up of pulmonary arteries, veins, bronchi, and lymph
nodes. They should be equal in size, shape, and density. A displaced hilum may suggest
lung volume loss. A dense or enlarged hilum may be caused by lymphadenopathy
(due to infection, malignancy or sarcoidosis) or pulmonary hypertension (due to COPD
or heart disease).
• Nodules and masses may be dense and well defined (calcified) or soft tissue density and
poorly defined: the latter are more concerning for malignancy. They may be single or
multiple. Remember to check behind the heart for a subtle mass in the left lower lobe and
also to assess the basal segments of the lower lobes through the upper abdomen/diaphragm.
• Fissures. Check the normal appearance and position of the fissures, as these will be
distorted in lobar collapse.
23
Circulation
• Heart size (if it is a PA film). If you compare the width of the heart with that of the thorax,
the cardiothoracic ratio should be less than 50% in adults (Figure 3.6). Cardiomegaly may
be caused by heart failure.
• Mediastinal shift. If the heart no longer appears in the centre of the thorax the film may
be rotated, there may be volume loss pulling structures towards the pathology (lung or
lobar collapse) or volume increase pushing structures away from the pathology (tension
pneumothorax, haemothorax or large mass).
• Aortic arch (AA). This should be on the left. If small, there could be an atrial septal defect.
If enlarged, there may be hypertension, aortic stenosis or aortic dissection.
• Left heart border (LHB). The left atrium (LA) or left atrial appendage may be enlarged
in mitral valve disease (now rarely seen as rheumatic heart disease is less prevalent).
Fig. 3.6 Circulation structures on CXR. The left heart border (LHB) is made of the left atrium (LA)
superiorly and left ventricle (LV). The right heart border (RHB) is made up of the right atrium (dotted line)
only, as the right ventricle lies posteriorly. Aortic arch (AA), descending right pulmonary artery (PA). The
CTR (cardiothoracic ratio) is the greatest cardiac width ÷ the intrathoracic width at its widest point (inner rib
→ inner rib), <50% in adults.
24
ebookball.com