0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views2 pages

Administrative Monitoring Spot Check Form

The document is a Classroom Spot Check Rating Form used for administrative monitoring in schools under the Department of Education in the Philippines. It outlines indicators for evaluating teaching effectiveness across various areas such as content knowledge, learning environment, curriculum planning, and professionalism, with a rating scale from 1 to 4. The form also includes sections for strengths observed and suggestions for improvement, culminating in a numerical rating that categorizes performance as Unsatisfactory, Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, or Excellent.

Uploaded by

EDGARDO CORTEZ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views2 pages

Administrative Monitoring Spot Check Form

The document is a Classroom Spot Check Rating Form used for administrative monitoring in schools under the Department of Education in the Philippines. It outlines indicators for evaluating teaching effectiveness across various areas such as content knowledge, learning environment, curriculum planning, and professionalism, with a rating scale from 1 to 4. The form also includes sections for strengths observed and suggestions for improvement, culminating in a numerical rating that categorizes performance as Unsatisfactory, Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, or Excellent.

Uploaded by

EDGARDO CORTEZ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region III
Schools Division of Angeles City
CLASSROOM SPOT CHECK RATING FORM
(Administrative Monitoring)
School :
School Head :
Teacher Observed :
Grade :
Subject :
Date :
Directions: Observe a maximum of eight (8) indicators from the locally combined Key Results Areas (KRAs) that you can actively
spot during the classroom visit. Evaluate those indicators using check mark (✓). Provide additional comments if necessary to offer
specific feedback, commendations, or suggestions for improvement.
Rating Scale: Not Evident (1); Minimally Evident (2); Partially Evident (3); and Evident (4).

INDICATORS RATING
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy 1 2 3 4
 Demonstrates strong understanding of the subject matter and effective teaching methods.

 Uses diverse strategies to promote critical, creative, and higher-order thinking.

 Effectively teaches using the appropriate medium of instruction (Mother Tongue, Filipino, or English).

 Asks questions that enhance student understanding, engagement, and participation.


2. Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners 1 2 3 4
 Organizes the classroom to engage students in hands-on, meaningful activities.

 Maintains a well-organized, conducive learning environment.

 Manages student behavior positively, ensuring a focused learning environment.

 Tailors teaching methods to meet the diverse needs and interests of all students.
3. Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment 1 2 3 4
 Plans and implements lessons that meet curriculum requirements and adapt to different teaching
contexts.
 Executes lesson plans coherently, aligning activities with teaching goals.

 Uses appropriate instructional materials, including technology, to support learning goals.

 Designs and applies assessment strategies aligned with curriculum standards.


4. Professionalism 1 2 3 4
 Manages instructional time effectively, including punctuality.

 Follows school policies and procedures, fostering positive relationships within the school community.

 Demonstrates professionalism through care, respect, and integrity in teaching.


 Maintains appropriate grooming and professional appearance by wearing the prescribed uniform or
attire
Computation of Rating (Add and include only the scores under each KRA that was observed):
KRAs Scores Computation Descriptive Ratings

Jesus St., Brgy. Pulungbulu, Angeles City 2009, Philippines


(045) 901-9498 | [email protected]
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III
Schools Division of Angeles City

Numerical Rating = (Total Score ÷ 1:00 to 1:75 – Unsatisfactory


1 Number of Indicators Observed) 1:76 to 2:50 – Needs Improvement
2 Numerical Rating = 16 ÷ 6 = 2.67 2:51 to 3:25 – Satisfactory
3 Descriptive Rating = Satisfactory 3:26 to 4:00 – Excellent
4
Numerical Rating Descriptive Rating
TOTAL

Strengths Observed:

Suggestions for Improvement:

Observed: Noted:

Public Schools District Supervisor School Head

Jesus St., Brgy. Pulungbulu, Angeles City 2009, Philippines


(045) 901-9498 | [email protected]

You might also like