dk;kZy;
iz/kku funs’kd ys[kkijh{kk
mRrj&if’pe jsyos] t;iqj
OFFICE OF THE
PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR OF AUDIT,
NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY, JAIPUR
lgk;d ys[kkijh{kk vf/kdkfj;ksa@i;Zos{kdksa
ds fy;s
okf"kZd dk;Z&fu"iknu ewY;kadu izfrosnu
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORT
FOR
ASSISTANT AUDIT OFFICERS
OFFICER / SUPERVISORS
Jh @ Jherh @ Shri/Smt.
/Smt. …………………………………….…......
……………………………………
inuke@ Designation …………………………………………………
fnukad ………….……. ls …..…..……. rd dh vof/k ds fy, fjiksVZ
From …..………….……………. to …………………………………..
i;Zos{kdksa@lgk;d ys[kkijh{kk vf/kdkfj;ksa@ofj"B ys[kkijh{kk vf/kdkjh ds fy;s
okf"kZd dk;Z&fu"iknu ewY;kadu izfrosnu
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORT FOR SUPERVISORS /
ASSISTANT AUDIT OFFICER / SENIOR AUDIT OFFICER
____________________ ls __________________ rd dh vof/k ds fy;s izfrosnu
Report for the period from …………………………… to …………………………….
Hkkx&I
PART-I
oS;fDrd fooj.k
Personal Data
¼dk;kZy; ds iz’kklfud vuqHkkx n~okjk Hkjk tk;s½
(To be filled by the Administrative Section concerned of the Office)
1. deZpkjh dk uke@¼cM+s v{kjksa esa½ %
Name of the Officer
(in capital letters)
2. deZpkjh dh igpku@Employee I.D. %
3. inuke@Designation %
4. D;k deZpkjh vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr %
dk gS\
Whether the Official belongs to
Scheduled caste/Scheduled Tribe?
5. tUe frfFk %
Date of Birth
6. o`frd ,oa rduhdh ;ksX;rkvksa lfgr 'kS{kf.kd ;ksX;rk;sa %
Educational qualifications including
Professional and technical qualifications
7. mÙkh.kZ dh x;h foHkkxh; ijh{kk;sa ;kfu v-v-xz-i- %
¼flfoy] okf.kfT;d] jsyos] ih-&Vh-] fjosU;w ys[kkijh{kk½
Departmental Examination passed
i.e. SOGE (Civil, Commercial, Railway,
P&T, Revenue Audit etc.)
8. orZeku xzsM esa lrr fu;qfDr dh frfFk %
Date of continuous appointment to
the present grade
9. orZeku in vkSj ml in ij fu;qfDr dh frfFk %
Present post and date of appointment thereto
10. vuqHkkx] ftlesa fjiksVZ dh vof/k ds nkSjku lsok dh %
o"kZ@vof/k ds nkSjku ¼vodk’k] izf’k{k.k vkfn ij
jgus ds dkj.k½ M~;wVh ls vuqifLFkfr dh vof/k
Period of absence from duty
(on leave, training etc.) during the year.
If he has undergone training please specify
Hkkx&II
PART-II
Lo&ewY;kadu
SELF APPRAISAL
¼fjiksVkZ/khu deZpkjh }kjk Hkjk tk,½
(To be filled by the Official Reported upon)
¼d`i;k izfof"V;ka Hkjus ls igys izi= ds var esa fn, x, vuqns’kksa dks /;ku ls i<+ ysa+s½
(Please read carefully the instructions given at the end of the form before filling the entries)
1. dk;ksZa dk laf{kIr fooj.k %
Brief description of the duties
2. ¼d½ d`i;k Lo;a n~okjk fu/kkZfjr ;k vkils fy;s fu/kkZfjr dk;Z ds y{;@mn~ns’;@/;s; ¼ek=kRed ;k
vU; :iksa esa½ dk mYys[k djsaA izkFkfedrk ds Øe esa vkB ls nl dk;Z dh enksa rFkk izR;sd ds
lkeus viuh miyfC/k dk mYys[k djsaA
2. A. Please specify targets/objectives/goals (in quantitative or other terms) of work you set for yourself or
that were set for you, eight or ten items of work in the order of priority and your achievement against
each target.
y{;@mn~ns’;@/;s; miyfC/k;k¡
Target/Objectives/Goals Achivements
2. ¼[k½ ;fn vki lgk;d ys[kkijh{kk@ys[kk vf/kdkjh gSa] d`i;k Qkbyksa dh NVuh rFkk i`"Bkadu] vfHkys[ku
ds laca/k esa fd, x, dk;Z dk;Z dh ek=k] xkMZ Qkby dk j[kj[kko] vuqHkkxh; uksV cqd rFkk vU;
jftLVjksa o dk;kZy; Kkiu bR;kfn ds j[kj[kko dks la{ksfir djsaA
2. B. If you are a Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer, please state briefly, the target set and the quantum of
work done in regard to recording, indexing and weeding out of files, maintenance of Guard Files,
Sectional Note Book and other registers, furnishing of O & M and other returns etc.
3. ¼d½ d`i;k en 2 esa crk, x, y{;ksa@mn~ns’;ksa dh izfr esa gks jgh dfe;ksa dk la{ksi esa mYys[k djsaA
;fn y{;ksa dh izkfIr esa ck/kk jgh gks rks crk,aA
3. A. Please state briefly the shortfalls with reference to the targets/objectives referred to the column.
2. Please specify constraints, if any, in achieving the targets.
3. ¼[k½ d`i;k mu enksa dk Hkh mYys[k djsa ftuesa dkQh vf/kd miyfC/k;k¡ jgh gSa vkSj muesa vius ;ksxnku
dk Hkh mYys[k djsaA
3. B. Please also indicate items in which there have been significantly, higher achievement and your
contribution thereto.
3. ¼x½ dkWye 2 esa fufnZ"V ds vfrfjDr vU; fof’k"V miyfC/k;k¡A
3. C. Any significant additional achievements apart from those mentioned in Column 2.
3. ¼?k½ izf’k{k.k izkIr fd;kA
3. D. Training programme attended.
fjiksVkZ/khu deZpkjh ds gLrk{kj
Signature of the Officer reported upon __________________
iwjk uke
Full Name …………………………………..
inuke
Designation …………………………………
fnukad
Date …………………………………………
Hkkx&III
PART-III
¼fjiksfVZax vf/kdkjh }kjk Hkjk tk,½
(To be filled in by Reporting Officer)
1. d`i;k crk,a fd D;k vki Hkkx&II esa of.kZr] deZpkjh ds Lo&ewY;kadu ls lger gSa\ ;fn ugha] rks
rF;kRed o.kZu izLrqr djsaA
Please state whether you agree with the self-appraisal of the Official reported upon as mentioned in
Part-II. If not, please furnish the factual details.
2. dk;Z fu"iknu dk ewY;kadu
vadh; xzsfMax dk fu/kkZj.k fjiksVZ fy[kus okys rFkk leh{kk izkf/kdkjh }kjk fd;k tkuk gS tks 01&10
ds iSekus ij gksuk pkfg,] tgk¡ 1 vad fuEure Js.kh rFkk 10 vad mPpre Js.kh ds fy, gSaA bl
Hkkx ds 40% vad gksaxsA
Assessment of work output
Numerical grading is to be assigned by Reporting and Reviewing Authorities on a scale of 1-10
(One – Ten), where 1 refers to the lowest and 10 to the highest grade. Weightage to this Section
would be 40 percent.
Ø- en fjiksfVZax leh{kk leh{kk
la- Items izkf/kdkjh izkf/kdkjh izkf/kdkjh ds
Sl. Reporting ¼Hkkx&IV dk vkn~;k{kj
No. Authority iSjk 2 nsf[k,½ Initial of
Reviewing Reviewing
Authority Authority
(Refer Para 2
of Part-IV)
(i) fu;ksftr dk;Z dh miyfC/k@vkoafVr
fo"k;kuqlkj vkoafVr dk;Z
Accomplishment of planned work/work
allotted as per subject allotted
(ii) fu"iknu dh xq.koRrk
Quality of output
(iii) fo'ys"k.k dh ;ksX;rk
Analytical ability
(iv) fo'ks"k dk;Z dh miyfC/k;k¡@fd, x,
vizR;kf{kr dk;Z
Accomplishment of exceptional work/
unforeseen tasks performed
(v) *dk;Z fu"iknu* ds fy, lexz Js.khdj.k
Overall Grading on ‘Work Output’
3. O;fDrxr xq.kksa dk ewY;kadu
vadh; xzsfMax dk fu/kkZj.k fjiksVZ fy[kus okys rFkk leh{kk izkf/kdkjh }kjk fd;k tkuk gS tks 01&10
ds iSekus ij gksuk pkfg,] tgk¡ 1 vad fuEure Js.kh rFkk 10 vad mPpre Js.kh ds fy, gSaA bl
Hkkx ds 30% vad gksaxsA
Assessment of personal attributes
Numerical grading is to be assigned by Reporting and Reviewing Authorities on a scale of 1-10
(One – Ten), where 1 refers to the lowest and 10 to the highest grade. Weightage to this Section
would be 30 percent.
Ø- en fjiksfVZax leh{kk leh{kk
la- Items izkf/kdkjh izkf/kdkjh izkf/kdkjh
Sl. Reporting ¼Hkkx&IV dk ds
No. Authority iSjk 2 nsf[k,½ vkn~;k{kj
Reviewing Initial of
Authority Reviewing
(Refer Para 2 Authority
of Part-IV)
(i) dk;Z ds izfr vfHko`fRr
Attitude to work
(ii) mRrjnkf;Ro dk cks/k
Sense of responsibility
(iii) vuq'kklu dk ikyu
Maintenance of Discipline
(iv) laizs"k.k dkS’ky
Communication skills
(v) usr`Ro xq.koRrk
Leadership qualities
(vi) Vhe Hkkouk ls dk;Z djus dh {kerk
Capacity to work in team spirit
(vii) fu;r le; esa dk;Z fu"iknu dh {kerk
Capacity to adhere to time-schedule
(viii) varoSZ;fDrd laca/k
Inter-personal relations
(ix) lexz Nfo ,oa O;fDrRo
Overall bearing and personality
(x) *O;fDrxr fo’ks"krkvksa* ds fy, lexz
Js.khdj.k
Overall Grading on ‘Personal Attributes’
4. dk;kZRed {kerk dk ewY;kadu
vadh; xzsfMax dk fu/kkZj.k fjiksVZ fy[kus okys rFkk leh{kk izkf/kdkjh }kjk fd;k tkuk gS tks 01&10
ds iSekus ij gksuk pkfg,] tgk¡ 1 vad fuEure Js.kh rFkk 10 vad mPpre Js.kh ds fy, gSaA bl
Hkkx ds 30% vad gksaxsA
Assessment of functional competency
Numerical grading is to be assigned by Reporting and Reviewing Authorities on a scale of 1-10
(One – Ten), where 1 refers to the lowest and 10 to the highest grade. Weightage to this Section
would be 30 percent.
Ø- en fjiksfVZax leh{kk izkf/kdkjh leh{kk
la- Items izkf/kdkjh ¼Hkkx&IV dk izkf/kdkjh
Sl. Reporting iSjk 2 nsf[k,½ ds
No. Authority Reviewing vkn~;k{kj
Authority Initial of
(Refer Para 2 Reviewing
of Part-IV) Authority
(i) dk;Z{ks= esa fu;eksa@fofu;eksa@ dk;Zfof/k dk
Kku rFkk mUgsa lgh rjg ls ykxw djus dh
;ksX;rk
Knowledge of Rules/ Regulations/
Procedures in the area of function and ability
to apply them correctly
(ii) uhfrc) ;kstuk dh {kerk
Strategic planning ability
(iii) fu.kZ; ysus dh {kerk
Decision making ability
(iv) leUo; {kerk
Coordination ability
(v) v/khuLFkksa ds fodflr ,oa izsfjr djus dh
{kerk
Ability to motivate and develop subordinates
(vi) igy
Initiative
(vii) *dk;kZRed {kerk* ds fy, lexz Js.khdj.k
Overall Grading on ‘Functional
Competency’
5. ¼d½ vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr@lekt ds detksj oxksZa ds izfr n`f"Vdks.k ¼d`i;k muds vuqlwfpr
tkfr@tutkfr@detksj oxksZa dh leL;kvksa dks le>us rFkk muls fuiVus dh bPNk ij fVIi.kh
djsa½
5. A. Attitude towards Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/Weaker Sections of Society (Please
comment on his/her understanding of the problems of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled
Tribe/Weaker Sections and willingness to deal with them)
5. ¼[k½ vuqlwfpr tkfr vkSj@;k vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds fodkl vkSj laj{k.k djus esa izHkkooRrkA
5. B. Effectiveness in the development and protection of Scheduled Castes and/or Scheduled Tribes.
(a) vuqlwfpr tkfr vkSj@;k vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds izfr n`f"Vdks.kA
Attribute towards Scheduled Castes and/or Scheduled Tribes.
(b) lkekftd U;k; ds izfr laosnu’khyrkA
Sensitivity to Social Justice.
(c) vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa@;k vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds izfr Øwjrk jksdus vkSj
lekIr djus rFkk muds fy, U;k; lqfuf’pr djus gsrq 'kh?kz rFkk izHkkoh
dkjZokbZ dh {kerkA
Ability to take quick and effective action to prevent and quell atrocities and
ensure justice to Scheduled Castes and/or Scheduled Tribes.
(d) vuqlwfpr tkfr vkSj@;k vuqlwfpr tutkfr dk fodkl djus esa
izHkkooRrkA
Effectiveness in bringing about the development of Scheduled Castes
and/or Scheduled Tribes.
** ¼dsoy mu vf/kdkfj;ksa ds ekeyksa esa Hkjk tk, tks vuqlwfpr tkfr vkSj@;k vuqlwfpr tutkfr
ds fodkl vkSj laj{k.k ds dk;Z ls lacaf/kr gksaA ;fn dksbZ dkWye vf/kdkjh ls lac) ugha gS rks
dkWye ds le{k mYys[k djsa½
** (To be filled in only in the case of officers dealing with development and protection of SCs and/or
STs. Where the column is not applicable in the case of any officer, it may be so stated against the
column.)
6. vfHko`fr ,oa {kerk%
6. Attitude & Potential:
d`i;k fuEu esa ls vf/kdkjh ds dSfj;j ds fodkl ,oa laHkkfor fo’ks"kKrk ds fy, rhu dk;Z {ks=ksa dks
n’kkZ,A
(Please indicate three fields of work from amongst the following for possible specialization and
career development of the officer. Please mark 1, 2, 3, in three appropriate boxes.)
(i) izkfIr ys[kkijh{kk Receipt Audit
(ii) okf.kT; ys[kkijh{kk Commercial Audit
(iii) Lok;Ùk fudk;ksa dh ys[kkijh{kk Autonomous Bodies Audit
(iv) oDlZ ys[kkijh{kk Works Audit
(v) vU; ys[kkijh{kk Other Audit
(vi) Lo iz’kklu ,oa dk;kZy; izca/ku Personal Administration
and Office Management
(vii) ys[kk dk;Z Account Function
(viii) gdnkjh dk;Z Entitlement Function
(ix) izf'k{k.k Training
(x) flLVEl] Systems, O & M Computerisation
(xi) vU; {ks= ¼d`i;k fufnZ"V djsa½ Any other fields (please
specify)
7. izf’k{k.k
7. Training:
d`i;k vf/kdkjh dh dk;Z {kerkvksa vkSj vf/kd lq/kkj dh n`f"V ls mlds izf’k{k.k dh vuq’kalk djsaA
Please give recommendations for training with a view to further improving the effectivenesss
and capabilities of the officer
8. ys[kkijh{kk] ys[kk vf/kdkfj;ksa@ofj"B ys[kkijh{kk@ys[kk vf/kdkfj;ksa gsrq vfrfjDr fo’ks"krk,¡A
8. Additional Attributes for Audit/Accounts Officers, Senior Audit/Accounts Officers
(i) i;kZoj.k ds izfr vfHko`frA Attitude towards environment
(a) d`i;k ys[kkijhf{krh laxBuksa ds lkFk mlds lg;ksx dks izdk’k esa yk,a rFkk laca/kksa ij fVIi.kh
djsaA Please comment on his/her relations with the auditee organizations and ability to elicit
co-operation from them.
(b) d`i;k O;fDrxr nkoksa ls lacaf/kr f’kdk;rksa ds fuokj.k ds izfr mldh vfHko`fr ij fVIi.kh
djsaA Please comment on his/her attitude towards redressal of grievances relating to personal
claims.
9. LokLF; dh fLFkfr
State of health:
10. lR;fu"Bk
¼d`i;k vuqns’k ds uhps fn, x, uksV dks ns[ksaA½
Integrity:
(Please see note below the instruction)
11. fjiksVZ fy[kus okys vf/kdkjh }kjk deZpkjh dh fo’ks"krkvksa dk lexz fooj.k ¼yxHkx 100 'kCnksa esa½
ftlesa lkeF;Z {ks= ,oa de lkeF;Z {ks=] vlk/kkj.k miyfC/k;ksa ,oa detksfj;ksa ds izfr n`f"Vdks.k
'kkfey gksA
Pen Picture by Reporting Officer (in about 100 words) on the overall qualities of the official
including area of strength and lesser strength, extraordinary achievements, significant failures.
12. fjiksVZ ds Hkkx&3 ds iSjk 2] 3 vkSj 4 esa fn, x, vadksa ds vk/kkj ij lexz vadh; Js.khdj.kA
Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in Para 2, 3 and 4 in Part-III of the
Report.
fjiksVZ fy[kus okys vf/kdkjh ds gLrk{kj
Signature of the Reporting Officer ______________________
uke ¼cM+s v{kjksa esa½
Name (in Block Letters) …………...……….
inuke
LFkku% Designation ………………………………...
Place: _________ fjiksVZ dh vof/k
fnukad% Period of Report ……………………............
Date: ________
Hkkx&IV
PART-IV
leh{kk vf/kdkjh dh vH;qfDr;k¡
REMARKS OF THE REVIEWING OFFICER
1. leh{kk vf/kdkjh ds v/khu dh xbZ lsok dh vof/k
Length of service under the Reviewing Officer
2. D;k vki Hkkx&III esa mfYyf[kr fofHkUu fo’ks"krkvksa rFkk dk;Z fu"iknu ds laca/k esa fjiksfVaZx vf/kdkjh
ds ewY;kadu ls lger gSa\ ;fn vki xq.kksa ds fdlh Hkh vadh; ewY;kadu ls lger ugha gSa rks d`i;k
Hkkx&III esa vkids fy, fu/kkZfjr LraHk esa viuk ewY;kadu fy[ksa rFkk viuh izfof"V;ksa ij vk|k{kj
djsaA
Do you agree with the assessment made by the Reporting Officer with respect to the work output and
the various attributes in Part-III ? In case you do not agree with any of the numerical assessments of
attributes please record your assessment in the column provided for you in Part-III and initial your
entries.
gk¡] eSa lger gw¡ ugha] eSa lger ugha gw¡A eSaus Hkkx&III esa viuk ewY;kadu ntZ fd;k gSA
Yes, I agree. No, I do not agree. I have recorded my assessment in Part-III
¼d`i;k tks ykxw u gks mls dkV nsa½
(Please strike out whichever is not applicable)
3. vlger gksus dh fLFkfr esa] d`i;k mldk fooj.k nsa ,oa dkj.k fy[ksaA
In case of difference of opinion, please give details and reasons for the same.
4. ;fn fjiksfVaZx vf/kdkjh }kjk n’kkZ, x, ewY;kadu ij dksbZ fVIi.kh djuk pkgrs gSa] rks mYys[k djsaA
Comments, if any, on the Pen Picture written by the Reporting Officer.
5. fjiksVZ ds Hkkx&III ds iSjk 2] 3 o 4 esa fn, x, vadksa ds vk/kkj ij lexz vadh; Js.khdj.kA
Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in Para 2, 3 and 4 in Part-III of the Report.
leh{kk vf/kdkjh ds gLrk{kj
Signature of the Reviewing Officer
uke ¼cM+s v{kjksa esa½
Name (in Block Letters) ……………….
inuke
LFkku% Designation …………………………...
Place: _________ fjiksVZ dh vof/k
fnukad% Period of Report ……………………...
Date: ________
