Bodythink Program-Based Body Image Education Improves Korean Adolescents' Attitudes Toward Cosmetic Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial
Bodythink Program-Based Body Image Education Improves Korean Adolescents' Attitudes Toward Cosmetic Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background The aims of this study were to modify the widely used BodyThink program to suit the circumstances of
Korean schools and determine its effects on body esteem, body image, appearance stress, depression, and attitudes
toward cosmetic surgery.
Methods Participants were 184 third-grade students from two middle schools in Korea, who were randomly
assigned to a control or intervention group. Two of the participants dropped out; hence, data from 182 students were
analyzed. The control group received the existing curriculum for 4 sessions, and the experimental group was provided
with 4 sessions of the revised BodyThink program. Before and after the intervention, all participants completed
questionnaires.
Results In the BodyThink group, improved body image, decreased depression, and positive improvements in
attitudes toward cosmetic plastic surgery were observed after the intervention.
Discussion These results suggest that school health nurses can utilize interventions based on BodyThink program in
their curricula to improve the physical and emotional health of adolescents.
Trial registration This study has been retrospectively registered with the Clinical Research information Service (CRIS)
in Korea on October 5, 2023 (KCT0008839).
Keywords Body image, Depression, Cosmetic surgery, Adolescent
†
Hyeonhwa Sung and A Young Han contributed equally to this work.
*Correspondence:
Geun Hee Seol
[email protected]
1
Department of Basic Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Korea
University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Nursing, College of Life Science and Industry, Sunchon
National University, Suncheon, Republic of Korea
3
BK21 FOUR Program of Transdisciplinary Major in Learning Health
Systems, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,
sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included
in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The
Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available
in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Sung et al. BMC Nursing (2023) 22:481 Page 2 of 10
Hence, the final analysis included 90 students in the Appearance stress instruments
experimental group and 92 in the control group (Fig. 1). Appearance stress refers to the psychological pressure
felt about one’s overall appearance, and was measured
Body esteem instruments using the instrument developed by Yang [19]. A total of
Body esteem refers to an individual’s subjective percep- 19 questions are measured on a 5-point Likert scale, with
tion and evaluation of his or her own body. Body esteem higher scores indicating higher appearance stress. Cron-
was assessed using the scale developed by Mendelson, bach’s alpha value was 0.95 in the present study and 0.92
Andrews, Balfour, and Buchoiz (1997) for adolescents in the work of Yang (1993).
and adults, adapted by Lee [16, 17]. This scale consists
of 23 questions on a 4-point Likert scale, with a higher Depression instruments
score indicating higher body esteem. Questions 4, 7, 9, The Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression
11, 13, 17, 18, 19, and 21, which have negative connota- (CES-D) scale Korean version was used to measure
tions, were reverse calculated. Cronbach’s α coefficient depression [20]. The CES-D scale developed by the
was found to be 0.90 in the present study, similar to the American Institute of Mental Health (1971) was trans-
value of 0.92 obtained by Lee (2001). lated into Korean by Noh (1992) and revised to 26 ques-
tions by adding 4 questions to ensure reliability. The
Body image instruments Korean version of CES-D uses a 4-point Likert scale to
Body image refers to an individual’s satisfaction with the evaluate the frequency of recently experienced depressive
shape and function of each part of his or her body. Body symptoms, with higher scores indicating higher levels of
image was assessed using the body cathexis scale devel- depression. Questions 4, 8, 12, and 16 were back-calcu-
oped by Secord and Jourard [18]. This scale consists of lated. This tool has been used several times in Korean
46 questions on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores adolescents. Cronbach’s α coefficient was found to be
indicating higher satisfaction with one’s body. Cronbach’s 0.91 in the present study, and 0.89 in the study by Cho
α coefficient was found to be 0.95 in the present study, and Kim (1993).
compared to 0.83 in the study of Secord and Jourard
(1953).
Fig. 1 Flow diagram of the study and number of participants at each stage
Sung et al. BMC Nursing (2023) 22:481 Page 4 of 10
Cosmetic surgery attitude instruments and post-data was collected immediately after the fourth
Cosmetic surgery attitude, which refers to an individ- training session.
ual’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery, was assessed
using the scale developed by Jeon & Lee [21]. This scale Ethical considerations
consists of 19 questions on a 4-point Likert scale, with All procedures in this study were conducted with the
higher scores indicating a more active intention toward approval of the Korea University Institutional Review
cosmetic surgery. This tool consists of 5 sub-categories Board (Code: KUIRB-2023-0141-01). Registration for this
comprising 4 questions about secrecy regarding cosmetic study as a CRIS clinical trial has been completed (Code:
surgery, 4 questions about the value of cosmetic surgery, KCT0008839). Considering the characteristics of middle
5 questions about conformity regarding cosmetic sur- school students, the study was conducted with the con-
gery, 4 questions about payment for cosmetic surgery, sent of the school principal, parents, and the students
and 3 questions about risk tolerance for cosmetic surgery. themselves prior to data collection. A study description
Cronbach’s α in Jeon’s (2002) study was 0.63 for secrecy and consent form specifying the purpose of the study,
regarding cosmetic surgery, 0.75 for value of cosmetic research content and procedures, confidentiality of data,
surgery, 0.84 for conformity regarding cosmetic surgery, disposal after completion of the study, and possibility of
0.75 for payment for cosmetic surgery, and 0.79 for risk cancellation at any time during participation were sent
tolerance for cosmetic surgery, and the corresponding home, and written consent was obtained.
values obtained in the present study were 0.86, 0.87, 0.78,
0.86, and 0.90, respectively. Statistical analyses
Data were expressed as numbers and percentages or
Revised BodyThink program means and standard deviations. The collected data were
The BodyThink program applied in this study maintained subjected to a two-sided test at a significance level of
the same topics and activities as the previously deployed 0.05 using SPSS 28.0. After verifying the normality of the
BodyThink program [14], but several parts were modified data and homogeneity between groups, the independent
to make it applicable to a Korean context (Table 1). For t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, paired t-test, and Wilcoxon
example, the existing program lasted 50 min per session, Signed-Rank test were used to compare the differences
but in the present study sessions were 45 min, the regular in the effectiveness of the intervention program between
class time in Korean schools. The intervention consisted and within the experimental and control groups. The
of 4 sessions, the same as in the existing program. Some possibility of gender differences was considered, but
video materials were changed to feature Korean culture because the analysis of the results of this study did not
and Korean people. To increase intervention fidelity in show significant differences between genders, the data
our study, we implemented three strategies. First, the were analyzed based on the control group and experi-
topics and activities of the revised program were verified mental group [22].
for content validity through consultation with two nurs-
ing professors. Second, a syllabus was created for each Results
session regarding the educational content provided to Participant characteristics
the control and intervention groups, and the classes were Of the 182 participants, 105 (57.7%) were boys, and the
conducted according to the protocol. Third, to increase average age was 14.47 years old. The average BMI of
the internal validity of the study, the author of the present the participants was 21.32 kg/m2, and 95 (52.2%) were
study, a middle school health nurse (HS), delivered the within the normal range. Ninety-four (51.7%) partici-
program to all students. pants preferred sweet tastes. Among all participants, the
average scores for the dependent variables were as fol-
Intervention lows: body esteem, 2.50 ± 0.52 (out of 4.00) points; body
The intervention was conducted after school for 4 weeks, image, 3.39 ± 0.76 (out of 5.00) points; appearance stress,
once a week from May to June 2023. The control group 2.28 ± 0.88 (out of 4.93) points; depression, 1.88 ± 0.51
was given four sessions of healthy body image education (out of 3.65) points, and cosmetic surgery attitude,
linked to the existing curriculum. For example, it cov- 1.55 ± 0.56 (out of 3.16) points. There was no significant
ered topics such as the characteristics of physical devel- difference in the baseline scores of the participants’ gen-
opment during adolescence, establishment of a desirable eral characteristics, body esteem, body image, appear-
body image, health promotion culture, and health threat ance stress, depression, and cosmetic surgery attitude
culture. The experimental group was provided with 4 ses- between the control and experimental groups, ensuring
sions of the revised BodyThink program. The interven- homogeneity (Table 2).
tions for each group are detailed in Table 1. Pre-data were
collected immediately before the first training session,
Sung et al. BMC Nursing (2023) 22:481 Page 5 of 10
Table 1 (continued)
Sessions Control group Experimental group
4th Aims • Identify health risk cultures such as fad imitation and suggest • Understand the reality and risks of youth cosmetic surgery
improvements • Reinforce behaviors that positively impact body image and
self-esteem
Development 1. Health risk culture 1. The dangers of adolescent cosmetic surgery and the
• Explain the concepts of fashion imitation culture, appear- beauty of choosing oneself
ance-oriented culture, safety insensitivity, and addiction • Explain the reality and risks of youth cosmetic surgery
culture • Watch and discuss the Choose Beautiful video
• Explain the seriousness of the culture of indiscriminate • Watch and discuss the video of a girl who was teased for
imitation of trends and emphasis on appearance due to the having a rare disease, but became a top model
influence of consumer culture and media • Complete individual activity sheet ‘What can I do to con-
• Explain the health threats of addiction culture and insensitiv- tinue to help my body?’
ity to safety
• Think about ways to improve health risk culture in daily life
Summary • Summarize the impact of health risk culture on health • Summary of the effects of appearance-related teasing and
countermeasures
Effects of intervention on body esteem and body image group changed only slightly, with a score difference of
The body esteem scores of both the control and 0.02 ± 0.39 between before and after training, whereas
experimental groups increased slightly after train- the experimental group’s score increased significantly
ing, with no statistically significant difference between from 3.39 ± 0.69 before training to 3.55 ± 0.72 after
the two groups. The body image score of the control training (p < 0.05, Table 3). After training, there was no
Sung et al. BMC Nursing (2023) 22:481 Page 7 of 10
Table 3 Outcome variables of BodyThink program of study Effects of the intervention on cosmetic surgery attitude
participants After the intervention, there was a significant differ-
Variables Control Experi- Z* P* ence in the change in cosmetic surgery attitude scores
(n = 92) mental
(n = 90)
between the control and experimental groups (0.03 ± 0.38
Body esteem vs. -0.19 ± 0.41, p < 0.001). Compared to baseline, the cos-
Pre 2.55 ± 0.54 2.45 ± 0.51 metic surgery attitude score of the control group did not
Post 2.59 ± 0.53 2.49 ± 0.51 differ significantly after the intervention, whereas the
Difference 0.04 ± 0.28 0.04 ± 0.36 -0.276 0.782 score of the experimental group after training was signifi-
P† 0.059 0.226 cantly lower (1.59 ± 0.58 vs. 1.40 ± 0.52, p < 0.001, Table 3).
Body image The change in score between before and after the inter-
Pre 3.39 ± 0.75 3.39 ± 0.69 vention in the cosmetic surgery attitude subcategories
Post 3.42 ± 0.84 3.55 ± 0.72 differed significantly between the control and experimen-
Difference 0.02 ± 0.39 0.16 ± 0.56 -1.509 0.131 tal groups (Fig. 2). The cosmetic surgery secrecy score,
P** 0.824 0.028 which indicates a person’s desire to hide having under-
Appearance stress gone cosmetic surgery, of the control group changed
Pre 2.20 ± 0.85 2.36 ± 0.90 very little whereas the score for the experimental group
Post 2.15 ± 0.89 2.29 ± 0.91 decreased, with the difference between the groups being
Difference -0.05 ± 0.44 -0.07 ± 0.55 -0.217 0.828 significant (0.01 ± 0.06 vs. -0.38 ± 0.08, p < 0.001). The
P** 0.455 0.297 change in cosmetic surgery value score, which indicates
Depression the desire to improve one’s appearance through cosmetic
Pre 1.89 ± 0.55 1.86 ± 0.47 surgery, also decreased significantly in the experimen-
Post 1.82 ± 0.50 1.80 ± 0.53 tal group compared to the control group (0.07 ± 0.06 vs.
Difference -0.07 ± 0.39 -0.05 ± 0.43 -1.011 0.312 -0.21 ± 0.05, p < 0.01). The change in cosmetic surgery
P** 0.288 0.046 conformity score, which refers to the psychological
Cosmetic surgery pressure to imitate the appearance or opinions of oth-
attitude
ers, showed no difference in the control group, while
Pre 1.51 ± 0.54 1.59 ± 0.58
the experimental group showed a significant change,
Post 1.54 ± 0.64 1.40 ± 0.52
decreasing by 0.16 from before to after the interven-
Difference 0.03 ± 0.38 -0.19 ± 0.41 -3.851 < 0.001
tion (p < 0.01). The change in cosmetic surgery payment
P** 0.830 < 0.001
score, which indicates willingness to pay for cosmetic
Note. Mean ± SD, *Mann-Whitney U test, **
Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test, †paired
t-test surgery, also significantly decreased in the experimen-
tal group compared to the control group (0.01 ± 0.05 vs.
statistically significant difference in body image between -0.16 ± 0.06, p < 0.05). These results show that the Body-
the two groups. These results show that the BodyThink Think program has a positive effect on the formation of
program can help improve adolescents’ body image. adolescents’ attitudes toward cosmetic surgery.
media literacy, cognitive dissonance, and healthy weight content related to media literacy and self-esteem in the
information are the most promising approaches for BodyThink program makes it particularly suitable for this
improving body image perceptions in adolescents [31, population [33].
32]. The present results suggest a relationship between
In our study, the BodyThink program was found to improving body image and positive changes in cosmetic
have positive effects on body image satisfaction. This can surgery attitudes. A previous study showed that young peo-
be attributed to the emphasis of the BodyThink program ple have a higher level of media involvement than other age
on cultivating media literacy to enable adolescents to groups, and that the higher the level of media involvement,
critically view media images based on their understand- the higher the desire for cosmetic surgery, value attributed
ing of body image and self-esteem [14]. Given that young to cosmetic surgery, and attitudes toward risk tolerance [34].
people consume large volumes of media and are highly Eastern cultures, such as that of Korea, tend to pursue West-
affected by self-esteem issues, the preponderance of ern face and body shapes as beauty standards, emphasizing
Sung et al. BMC Nursing (2023) 22:481 Page 9 of 10
2. Bianchi D, Schinelli A, Fatta LM, Lonigro A, Lucidi F, Laghi F. Body image 24. Rezaeisharif A, Cheraghian H, Naeim M. Effectiveness of acceptance and
impact on quality of life and adolescents’ binge eating: the indirect role of commitment therapy on reducing body image disorders in adolescent girls.
body image coping strategies. Eat Weight Disord. 2023;28(1):75. https://doi. Addict Disorders Their Treat. 2021;20(4):336–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/
org/10.1007/s40519-023-01607-7. ADT.0000000000000265.
3. Choukas-Bradley S, Roberts SR, Maheux AJ, Nesi J. The perfect Storm: a 25. Eickman L, Betts J, Pollack L, Bozsik F, Beauchamp M, Lundgren J. Random-
Developmental-Sociocultural Framework for the role of Social Media in ado- ized controlled trial of REbeL: a peer education program to promote positive
lescent girls’ body image concerns and Mental Health. Clin Child Fam Psychol body image, healthy eating behavior, and empowerment in teens. Eat Disord.
Rev. 2022;25(4):681–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00404-5. 2018;26(2):127–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2017.1349005.
4. Rodgers RF, Slater A, Gordon CS, McLean SA, Jarman HK, Paxton SJ. A 26. Debeuf T, Verbeken S, Boelens E, Volkaert B, Van Malderen E, Michels N, Braet
Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and body image concerns, C. Emotion regulation training in the treatment of obesity in young adoles-
disordered eating, and muscle-building behaviors among adolescent girls cents: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21:1–17. https://
and boys. J Youth Adolesc. 2020;49(2):399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/ doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4020-1.
s10964-019-01190-0. 27. Franko DL, Cousineau TM, Rodgers RF, Roehrig JP. BodiMojo: effective
5. Ji Y. Statistics of the 18th (2022) Youth Health Behavior Survey. In. Edited by internet-based promotion of positive body image in adolescent girls. Body
Bureau CDM. Cheongju: Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; 2023. Image. 2013;10(4):481–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.04.008.
6. Tresna KAAD, Sukamto ME, Tondok MS. Celebrity worship and body image 28. Lewis-Smith H, Garbett KM, Chaudhry A, Dhillon M, Shroff H, White P,
among young girls fans of K-pop girl groups. Humanitas Indonesian Psy- Diedrichs PC. Evaluating a body image school-based intervention in India:
chological Journal. 2021;18(2):100–11. https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas. a randomized controlled trial. Body Image. 2023;44:148–56. https://doi.
v18i2.19392. org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.12.006.
7. Swami V, Hwang CS, Jung J. Factor structure and correlates of the acceptance 29. Gordon CS, Rodgers RF, Slater AE, McLean SA, Jarman HK, Paxton SJ. A cluster
of cosmetic Surgery scale among South Korean university students. Aesthet randomized controlled trial of the SoMe social media literacy body image
Surg J. 2012;32(2):220–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x11431577. and wellbeing program for adolescent boys and girls: study protocol. Body
8. Sisti A, Restrepo DJ, Boczar D, Rinker BD, Forte AJ. The meaning of plastic Image. 2020;33:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.003.
Surgery. 2019;82(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001712. 30. Cerea S, Ghisi M, Bottesi G, Manoli T, Carraro E, Doron G. Cognitive behavioral
9. Elfving-Hwang J. Media, cosmetic Surgery and aspirational beauty aesthet- training using a mobile application reduces body image-related symptoms
ics of the ageing body in South Korea. Asian Stud Rev. 2021;45(2):238–52. in high-risk female university students: a randomized controlled study. Behav
https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1736513. Ther. 2021;52(1):170–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2020.04.002.
10. Global Survey. 2021 https://www.isaps.org/discover/ 31. Stice E, Onipede ZA, Marti CN. A meta-analytic review of trials that tested
about-isaps/global-statistics/reports-and-press-releases/ whether eating disorder prevention programs prevent eating disorder onset.
global-survey-2021-full-report-and-press-releases/. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;87:102046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102046.
11. Kim YA, Chae D, Kim H. Factors affecting acceptance of cosmetic Sur- 32. Pursey KM, Burrows TL, Barker D, Hart M, Paxton SJ. Disordered eating, body
gery among undergraduate students. J Korea Contents Association. image concerns, and weight control behaviors in primary school aged chil-
2017;17(1):455–64. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.01.455. dren: a systematic review and meta-analysis of universal–selective prevention
12. Hayes JF, Fitzsimmons-Craft EE, Karam AM, Jakubiak J, Brown ML, Wilfley DE. interventions. Int J Eat Disord. 2021;54(10):1730–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/
Disordered eating attitudes and behaviors in Youth with overweight and eat.23571.
obesity: implications for treatment. Curr Obes Rep. 2018;7(3):235–46. https:// 33. Diedrichs PC, Atkinson MJ, Garbett KM, Leckie G. Evaluating the dove
doi.org/10.1007/s13679-018-0316-9. confident me five-session body image intervention delivered by teachers in
13. Hartman-Munick SM, Gordon AR, Guss C. Adolescent body image: influenc- schools: a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness trial. J Adolesc Health.
ing factors and the clinician’s role. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020;32(4):455–60. 2021;68(2):331–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.001.
https://doi.org/10.1097/mop.0000000000000910. 34. Park SK. The effect of media involvement and appearance satisfaction on
14. Richardson SM, Paxton SJ, Thomson JS. Is BodyThink an efficacious body plastic Surgery related attitudes and intentions - focusing on gender and
image and self-esteem program? A controlled evaluation with adolescents. age. Korean Soc Fashion Des. 2014;14(4):101–16.
Body Image. 2009;6(2):75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.11.001. 35. Lee H, Son I, Yoon J, Kim SS. Lookism hurts: appearance discrimination and
15. Titov N, Andrews G, Robinson E, Schwencke G, Johnston L, Solley K, Choi I. self-rated health in South Korea. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):204. https://
Clinician-assisted internet-based treatment is effective for generalized anxiety doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0678-8.
disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial. Australian & New Zealand Journal of 36. Robinson IS, Carswell JM, Boskey E, Agarwal CA, Brassard P, Bélanger M, Zhao
Psychiatry. 2009;43(10):905–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670903179269. LC, Bluebond-Langner R. Gender-affirming Surgery in adolescents and young
16. Lee J. Correlation among adolescents gender, obesity, others appraisal of adults: a review of ethical and Surgical considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg.
their bodies and the adolescents body-esteem. Cheongwon: Korea National 2023;152(4):737e–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000010325.
University of Education; 2001. 37. Seo YA, Kim YA. Predictors of Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery in South
17. Mendelson B, Mendelson M, Andrews J, Balfour L, Bucholz A. Three aspects Korean women. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022;46(4):2031–9. https://doi.
of body esteem in adolescents and young adults: Differential relations with org/10.1007/s00266-022-02795-w.
weight and self-esteem. Research in Child Development 1997;17(1):145–160. 38. Kwak Y-s. Tanghulu captures hearts of Korean millennials and Gen Z. In: The
18. Secord PF, Jourard SM. The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the Korea Times Seoul, Korea; 2023.
self. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1953;17(5):343. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060689. 39. Yang J, Han KS. A rational emotive behavior therapy-based intervention for
19. Yang K. The link between body-esteem and self-esteem during adolescence. binge eating behavior management among female students: a quasi-
Cheongju: Chungbuk National University; 1993. experimental study. J Eat Disorders. 2020;8(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/
20. Noh S, Avison WR, Kaspar V. Depressive symptoms among Korean s40337-020-00347-8.
immigrants: Assessment of a translation of the Center for epidemiologic 40. Bergren MD. Education is not enough. J School Nurs. 2023;39(2):103–4.
studies—Depression Scale. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(1):84. https://doi. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405231158450.
org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.84. 41. Soong C, Shojania KG. Education as a low-value improvement intervention:
21. Jeon KR, Lee MH. A study on the need, Self-Esteem and aesthetic Surgery often necessary but rarely sufficient. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29(5):353–7. https://
attitude of female. J Korean Soc Costume. 2002;52(6):71–83. doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010411.
22. Wilksch SM, Tiggemann M, Wade TD. Impact of interactive school-based
media literacy lessons for reducing internalization of media ideals in young
adolescent girls and boys. Int J Eat Disord. 2006;39(5):385–93. https://doi. Publisher’s Note
org/10.1002/eat.20237. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
23. Engel SG, Crosby RD, Thomas G, Bond D, Lavender JM, Mason T, Steffen KJ, published maps and institutional affiliations.
Green DD, Wonderlich SA. Ecological momentary assessment in eating dis-
order and obesity research: a review of the recent literature. Curr Psychiatry
Rep. 2016;18:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0672-7.