Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security Konstadinos Mattas PDF Download
Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security Konstadinos Mattas PDF Download
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-agriculture-and-
food-security-konstadinos-mattas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-agriculture-towards-
food-security-1st-edition-arulbalachandran-dhanarajan-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-agri-food-law-in-
china-germany-european-union-food-security-food-safety-
sustainable-use-of-resources-in-agriculture-1st-edition-ines-
hartel-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/microorganisms-in-sustainable-
agriculture-food-and-the-environment-1st-edition-deepak-kumar-
verma/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-food-systems-from-
agriculture-to-industry-improving-production-and-processing-1st-
edition-charis-michel-galanakis/
Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 45 Legume Agriculture
and Biotechnology Vol 1 Praveen Guleria
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-agriculture-
reviews-45-legume-agriculture-and-biotechnology-vol-1-praveen-
guleria/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sago-palm-multiple-
contributions-to-food-security-and-sustainable-livelihoods-1st-
edition-hiroshi-ehara/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-agriculture-
reviews-29-sustainable-soil-management-preventive-and-
ameliorative-strategies-rattan-lal/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-agriculture-forest-
and-environmental-management-manoj-kumar-jhariya/
https://textbookfull.com/product/ecological-and-practical-
applications-for-sustainable-agriculture-kuldeep-bauddh/
Cooperative Management
Sustainable
Agriculture and
Food Security
Aspects of Euro-Mediteranean Business
Cooperation
Cooperative Management
Series editors
Constantin Zopounidis, Production Engineering and Management, Technical
University of Crete, Chania, Greece
George Baourakis, Business Economics and Management, Mediterranean
Agronomic Institute of Chania, Chania, Greece
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/11891
Konstadinos Mattas George Baourakis
•
Constantin Zopounidis
Editors
Sustainable Agriculture
and Food Security
Aspects of Euro-Mediteranean Business
Cooperation
123
Editors
Konstadinos Mattas Constantin Zopounidis
Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Production Engineering
School of Agriculture and Management
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Technical University of Crete
Thessaloniki Chania
Greece Greece
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer International Publishing AG
part of Springer Nature
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Contents
v
vi Contents
The Cooperative Management Book Series creates a helpful framework for creative
and scholarly work on cooperative management, policy, economics, organizational,
financial, and marketing aspects of cooperative communities throughout the
Mediterranean region and worldwide. The main objectives of this book are to
advance knowledge related to collective management processes and cooperative
initiatives as well as to provide theoretical background for promoting research
within various sectors wherein market communities operate (agriculture, food
security, real estate, insurance, and other forms). Papers appearing in this series
should relate to one of these areas, should have a theoretical and/or empirical
problem orientation, and should demonstrate innovation in theoretical and empirical
analyses, methodologies, and applications. Further, this series encourages inter-
disciplinary and cross-disciplinary research from a broad spectrum of disciplines
ranging from environmental studies to business studies and food security.
The aim of this volume is to bring together researches from the agriculture and
food sectors to be combined over methodological and empirical issues regarding
relationships among Euro-Mediterranean countries on topics such as food policy,
trade, and environmental issues. The volume also focuses on Euro-Med food
relations including sustainability, marketing, trade, and policy issues. In this
respect, it is critical to examine the sustainability of food sector policies under the
perspective of the scarcity of natural resources.
Moreover, the degree of freedom and possible obstacles regarding trade activities
between Euro-Med countries is another crucial issue, taking also into consideration
the role of marketing. Proper methods will offer crucial insights into how to build
up powerful tools for decision-making, particularly today that agriculture and the
economy alike are affected by a volatile political, social, and economic environment
and forced to undergo severe structural changes. The increase in food prices since
2007 and the world food crisis had severe adverse effects in several countries,
causing macroeconomic problems (inflation, trade deficits, and fiscal pressure),
increased poverty and political instability. Policymakers have acknowledged food
relations as a key strategic area for Mediterranean countries, which needs to be
placed at the core of Euro-Mediterranean regional cooperation.
vii
viii Editorial
We would like to thank the assistant editor Georgios Manthoulis and English
professor Maria Verivaki for the English proofreading. We extend appreciation to
the authors and referees of these chapters, and Springer Academic Publications, for
their assistance in producing this book.
Konstadinos Mattas
George Baourakis
Constantin Zopounidis
Towards a More Democratic
and Sustainable Food System: The
Reflexive Nature of Solidarity Purchase
Groups and the Migrants’ Social
Cooperative “Barikamà” in Rome
Abstract Food insecurity, poverty and migration emergencies are the biggest
challenges that all modern societies have to deal with. The aim of this paper is to
explore the role played by civil society in dealing with these issues through a
reflexive approach. Starting from addressing the multidimensional nature of food
security, this deliverable comes to adopt the concept of a “democratic and sus-
tainable food system”. This change of focus allows to encompass all the comple-
mentary issues: e.g. poverty reduction, environmental sustainability, social equity
and social integration. Due to the complex nature of the matter, not only a strong
local and global coordination is needed but also a reflexive approach. After intro-
ducing the concept of reflexivity, this paper addresses the crucial role that civil
society organizations may play in the transition towards a more democratic and
sustainable food system, focusing on solidarity purchase groups in Italy. In par-
ticular, this deliverable spotlights the collaboration between solidarity purchase
groups (Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale—GAS-in Italian) and the migrants’ social
cooperative “Barikamà” in Rome. That shows an interesting example of how civil
society organizations may cope with poverty reduction, social integration and
sustainability.
D. Bernaschi (&)
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Florence and Turin,
Florence, Italy
e-mail: daniela.bernaschi@unifi.it
G. Crisci
Department of Planning and Geography, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
1 Introduction
Three relevant key points characterize this paper. Firstly, it takes into account the
Post-2015 Agenda presented by the United Nations at the Sustainable Development
Summit (New York, 2015). The first two SDGs to be reached by 2030 are the eradi-
cation of extreme poverty and the “Zero Hunger” program. There, the main ideas are to
achieve food security and improve nutrition through sustainable agriculture. Poverty,
food insecurity and sustainable agriculture are deeply interrelated phenomena.
Hence, policy strategies to achieve global food security may have to deal with a
wide range of issues: climate change, poverty reduction, social equity, hunger e.g.
(Arcuri et al., 2015; Marsden & Sonnino, 2012). Indeed, a key assumption in this
paper is that food security is a multidimensional concept; it goes beyond mere food
availability and entails different kinds of deprivation. With this in mind, the present
deliverable adopts the all-encompassing concept of a democratic and sustainable
food system.
Secondly, this paper discusses the link between a food system defined as
democratic and sustainable and the “reflexive” approach as a way to better coor-
dinate local and global issues (Duncan, 2015; Edwards et al., 2002; Marsden, 2013;
Voss & Kemp, 2005, 2006; Wolff, 2006). Reflexive governance is characterized by
a multi-stakeholder structure, interactive participation and social learning. Despite
their various declinations, the academic debates on reflexive governance agree that
a broader social participation, discussion and sharing of knowledge are crucial to
solve social problems. Hence, this paper illustrates the emerging contribution
offered by the reflexive governance in addressing new social issues.
Thirdly, it explores the role of civil society organizations in their attempt to
attain a more democratic and sustainable food system. The article analyses the three
specific contributions of solidarity purchase groups (Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale—
GAS-in Italian) in terms of: changing consumers’ behavior and improving nutrition,
supporting local development and enhancing social integration. Then, the collab-
oration between the GAS Movement and Barikamà will be discussed. Barikamà is a
cooperative founded by six migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa in 2014. Its expe-
rience demonstrates how civil society organizations can positively improve social
integration and contribute to the struggle against poverty, realizing a more demo-
cratic and sustainable food system.
“We live in a world of unprecedented opulence (…) People live much longer, on an
average, than ever before. (…) And yet we also live in a world with remarkable
deprivation, destitution and oppression. (…) Overcoming these problems is a
central part of the exercise of development” (Sen, 1999, Preface).
Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System … 3
still at the center of the academic debate. Despite the crises that have occurred over
the years, the global availability of food is sufficient to ensure almost 2800 kcal/
person/day (FAO, 2006), an amount that exceeds our needs. Looking at the figure
related to FAO’s data (2013a, b), we can also notice an unequal distribution among
countries: for instance, North America, France, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Romania
and Turkey are marked by more than 3,276 kcal per capita per day; whereas
Bolivia, Ecuador, Kenya, Ethiopia are marked by less than 2,454 kcal.
Over the last decades, a new definition of food security has been developed in
order to address its multidimensional nature. A great contribution to the elaboration
of a more comprehensive approach to food security was offered by Amartya Sen at
the beginning of 1980s.
Sen introduced an “entitlements-based analysis” in order to address famine and
hunger. In his famous work “Poverty and Famines” (1981), the focus of the
analysis shifted from food availability at the national level (Fig. 1) to people’s
entitlements. Hunger resulted as an economic issue, rather than a humanitarian one.
Whether we are unable to buy enough food to satisfy our hunger, then we are
destined to suffer from it (Sen, 2000b).
In a market economy, entitlements depend inter alia on the resources and
endowments available: labour force, land and the possession of production factors.
These said factors can be directly used or sold in the market. The entitlements are
related to the market opportunities for what we sell, and the prices and availability
of food and other goods that we want to buy. Getting enough food to eat or
otherwise be forced to go hungry depends on many aspects, such as the endow-
ments and the conditions of production and exchange. The totality of these factors
determines the type of entitlements.
Fig. 1 Global food availability. Source FAO Statistics Division (2013b), Food Balance Sheets,
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, http://www.fao.org/faostat/
en/#data/FBS/visualize, Reproduced with Permission
Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System … 5
Dahrendorf (1989) compared the entitlements to the tickets that allow access to a
desired place. Through these tools, you can have access to different combinations of
tangible and intangible assets that Dahrendorf called “provision”. The entitlements
approach highlights the institutional, political and socio-economic conditions linked
to food insecurity (Burchi & De Muro, 2012).
Sen’s research has affected the following definitions of food security, such as
that elaborated by the World Food Summit (1996), according to which food
security is the condition where: “All people, at all times, have physical and eco-
nomic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs
and food preferences for an active and healthy life”.
It may be useful to mention “Hunger and Public Action” (1989), a joint work by
Sen and Drèze, which had the merit to broaden the debate about food security by
turning the attention to food utilization, and therefore to nutritional capabilities.
“The object, in this view, is not so much to provide a particular amount of food
for each. Indeed, the relationship between food intake and nutritional achievement
can vary greatly depending not only on features such as age, sex, pregnancy,
metabolic rates, climatic conditions, and activities, but also access to complemen-
tary inputs” (Drèze & Sen, 1989: 13).
In general, food security is not achieved when all individuals get the same
amount of food, because the ability to draw nourishment from it depends on
multiple conversion factors related to personal characteristics (age, sex, physical
and mental health) and the family, social, economic and institutional environment.
Hence, food security does not reside in the dualism “production-consumption”
(Marsden & Sonnino, 2012). As shown by Drèze and Sen (1989), we must look at
the use of food and complementary inputs (whether people can have access to
drinking water, public health services, basic education, epidemics prevention pro-
grams) that have an impact on an individuals’ health.
In Sen’s words: “Hunger and undernutrition are related both to food intake and
to the ability to make nutritive use of that intake. The latter is deeply affected by
general health conditions and that in turn depends much on communal health care
and public health provisions” (1995: 115).
The stress on the multidimensional nature of food insecurity led Sen to use terms
such as “hunger” and “nutritional deprivation” and to avoid phrases like “food
security”, so as to remove all emphasis from “food” (Burchi & De Muro, 2012).
The need for a multidimensional approach to food security has triggered aca-
demic debates. The focus of the analysis shifted from a “production–consumption
framework” to all the complementary inputs: e.g. poverty reduction, environmental
sustainability issues, promotion of social equity.
The debate about access to food is enriched by many academic studies that
highlight the emergence of what Sonnino (2016) defines a “new geography of food
security”, namely the new spatial coordinates of the problem. In fact, the compass
of food insecurity is no longer rigidly fixed on the Global South and in the rural
areas but it also affects the Global North (Dowler & Lambie-Mumford, 2015),
where the paradox of “scarcity in abundance” (Campiglio & Rovati, 2009) is
reified.
6 D. Bernaschi and G. Crisci
Food is available but some segments of the population are unable to access food
that meets their nutritional and cultural needs (Maino et al., 2016; Shetty, 2015).
This condition is often described as “food poverty” and it entails multiple depri-
vations (Sonnino & Hanmer, 2016).
Maslen et al. (2013: 4) argue that “food poverty is complex and multi-faceted. It
is not simply about immediate hunger and how that might be alleviated. It is not just
about the quantity of food that is eaten, but involves the dietary choices, the cultural
norms and the physical and financial resources that affect which foods are eaten,
ultimately impacting on health status”.
As discussed by Sen (1995), the paradox of hunger in rich societies can be
understood only if we do not focus exclusively on the income dimension.
In this sense, Lang and Barling (2012) offer a conclusive consideration. They
assume that the complexity and the multidimensional nature of food security,
together with the diverse perspectives that its meaning implies, claim for a broader
understanding of that concept, and go on to argue that the concept itself may be
limited. For this reason, they suggest giving up the expression “food security” and
opting for a broader and all-encompassing definition: the “sustainable food system”.
Following Lang and Barling, the current deliverable adopts the concept of
“democratic and sustainable food system”. In this way, the multidimensional nature
of the issue will be easier to comprehend. This change of focus will also encompass
poverty reduction, environmental sustainability and social integration.
Considering what was previously realized in this paper, it seems pivotal to follow
Beck’s invitation (2003) to renew the conceptual tools, in order to understand the
contemporary social changes and the complexity of the matter.
Hence, it brings us to state that a more democratic and sustainable food system
requires not only a coordination between local and global dimension (Duncan,
2015), but also governance arrangements which are reflexive and able to adopt
flexible and prompt strategies (Voss & Kemp, 2005, 2006; Wolff, 2006; Marsden,
2013; Edwards et al., 2002).
Reflexive governance is a management strategy that does not imply a one-way
problem-solving analysis (Voss & Bornemann, 2011), but an interactive and par-
ticipative multi-stakeholder process, which considers different prospective analyses
and strategies (Feindt, 2010; Gottschick, 2013) to reach a shared solution on the
common social problems (Sonnino et al., 2014).
Studies about reflexive governance are indebted to the concept of “reflexive
modernity” formulated by Giddens (1990), Beck (1992) and Lush (1994),
according to whom reflexivity is “the capacity of an individual subject to direct
their awareness towards themselves, reflecting upon their own practices, and con-
stantly examining and reforming these practices in the light of incoming informa-
tion” (Giddens, 1990: 38).
Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System … 7
In reflexive governance, there are new social and political spaces, which engage
public, private and civic actors and allow a common reflection on practices to be
adopted in order to pursue the transition towards sustainability (Marsden, 2013) and
a better understanding of social change.
The more the governance process is participative, the more it is able to reach the
substantial goals of sustainability: wellbeing, social justice, respect for the envi-
ronment (Stirling, 2009).
In other words, despite their various declinations, the academic debates on
reflexive governance agree that a broader social participation, discussion and
sharing of knowledge are crucial to solve the social problems (Marsden, 2013;
Sonnino et al., 2014). The reflexive approach’s essence is apparent within the civil
society initiatives in their attempt to deal with the socio-economic challenges
affecting modern societies.
Those initiatives draw our attention to their adaptive and responsive nature that
make them able to develop innovative measures and creative responses to new
forms of social vulnerability. Due to their locally based nature, civil society ini-
tiatives have a direct and deep knowledge of the social realities in which they are
linked. This allows them to be more likely to capture the social transformations
taking place, react promptly and adapt their strategies.
It is sharply apparent that the number of civil society initiatives have increased
remarkably since the economic crisis which engulfed Europe in 2008, destroying
“employment, production and human security” (Sen, 2012: 6).
The rise in poverty, social exclusion and food insecurity rates (Eurostat, 2015)
has led to the flourishing of resilient civil society initiatives which work for a more
democratic and sustainable food system, such as: food banks, soup kitchens, soli-
darity purchase groups, urban agriculture, social markets, emporiums of solidarity.
What prompts the civil society to organize itself? At the core of the
community-based initiatives, there is what Beck (2003) calls “empathetic imagi-
nation”, unifying and universal feeling that promotes and justifies actions and leads
to open new communication and relational channels (Magatti, 2005).
However, Crespi’s definition of “solidarity” seems to be more accurate with this
paper’s contents. According to Crespi (1994, 2013), solidarity is an expression of
shared responsibility toward society, not just a selfless approach towards others.
Therefore, as Crespi (2013) stated, assuming the “constitutive sociability” of
human beings, solidarity can be defined as an emancipation process through par-
ticipation in community life. In other words, the constitution of a more democratic
and sustainable food system requires a greater sense of responsibility toward
society, caring more considerately for the world (Pulcini, 2009). Therefore, soli-
darity is crucial to ensure the survival of mankind and to promote inclusive
development.
In the deeper civic engagement, we can see not only a desire for a broader
participation, but also a social laboratory with innovative capacity and the ability of
humanizing social contexts (Magatti, 2005).
8 D. Bernaschi and G. Crisci
Civil society ensures that the local dimension “repossesses challenges that come
from the global dimension autonomously”1 (Leonardi, 2001: 39). In fact, the social
actors of civil society work to build what Beck (2003) calls “cosmopolitan society”,
a society which has a strong local anchoring without losing the linkages with the
global dimension, a society able to promote connections instead of exclusions
(Keane, 2003).
At the core of civil society initiatives (e.g. urban gardens, solidarity purchase
groups and social market), there is a dense network of solidarity ties used to deal
with social issues.2
If the top-down initiatives for local development are drawing increasing atten-
tion, the initiatives of civil society have not yet received the attention they deserve
(Moulaert et al., 2005).
For this reason, the aim of the following paragraph is to increase the theoretical
and practical understanding of civil society organizations. It will focus on the
experience of solidarity purchase groups in Rome and their reflexive role in:
changing consumers’ behavior and improving nutrition; supporting local develop-
ment; and enhancing social integration. Concerning the last point, social integration
will be addressed, introducing the support offered by the GAS Movement to six
African migrants in setting up their social cooperative called Barikamà.
1
Our translation.
2
An example is the “Eutorto”, an urban garden run by workers on redundancy payment which
belongs to Eutelia Information Technology in Rome. In this case, civil society developed alter-
native responses to the economic crisis and a group of workers decided to remain united to cope
with unemployment.
Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System … 9
and vegetables. These groups enable the culture of sustainability, a process that
should engage people and enforce their relationship with nature.
GAS are mainly informal groups and operated without any legal acknowl-
edgement until 2007, when the Italian governmental Budget Committee released an
amendment (Fifth Section) attached to the Finance Act. At a local level, several
regional, provincial and municipal authorities supported the emergence and
empowerment of GAS with small economic incentives (Schifani & Migliore,
2011).
Before that time, however, most of the GAS operated like single consumers or as
no-profit organizations or social promotion associations (Fonte & Salvioni, 2013).
Nowadays, even if they can still preserve their flexible legal form, the formal
recognition from the authorities has been relevant to classify them as a
non-commercial activity.
The GAS movement is organized in subgroups that act independently.
According to Retegas (1999), the activity of every single group is directed to create
a space for an ethical and sustainable food consumption which puts people together
rather than divide them.
A study led by the Coldiretti Farmers Union (2014) shows that from 2008 the
movement has increased by 400% in Italy, and the number of Italian citizens that
regularly arrange collective orders has reached 2.7 million.
The diffusion of these new forms of solidarity and social economies arises from a
new reflexive capacity in the consumers (Giddens, 1990), who reflect on their own
actions and modify them according to new incoming information. Furthermore, the
unprecedented rise of these types of economies can be seen as a specific form of
social self-defense (Guthman, 2007), since they are a response to the recession and
to social retrenchments.
This paper aims to spotlight how GAS can contribute towards a more sustainable
and democratic food system. In this regard, it will address GAS’s contribution in:
reshaping consumers’ behavior and improving nutrition; supporting local devel-
opment; and enhancing social integration.
As for the first point, local food networks are the alternative systems through
which individuals can have economic and physical access to food for a fair price
(Goodman & DuPuis, 2002; Renting et al., 2003). According to Crisci and Fonte
(2014), GAS’s members save up to 72.5% weekly, more than what they spend
when buying organic food through other sales channels. Since the vegetarian
purchase in GAS is less expensive than the omnivorous one, the reduction of meat
consumption renders GAS more competitive and improves the sustainability of
agrifood systems (Ibidem, 2014).
Hence, GAS can improve the economical and physical access to fresh and
organic food. In addition, the trend in consumption and lifestyle changes consis-
tently after joining a GAS: people consume more organic, seasonal and local food,
limit the consumption of meat and start to produce home-made food (Grasseni
et al., 2013).
The solidarity purchase groups can also reinforce local development. In fact,
their main goal is to support small-medium organic producers, who cannot survive
10 D. Bernaschi and G. Crisci
in the large-scale trade because they are not strong enough to compete in the
mainstream food system (Retegas, 1999). The fair price promoted by GAS is the
result of an agreement between consumers and producers.
Considering the difficulties sometimes faced by small enterprises, GAS’s
members set up pre-financing systems where consumers pay for crops in advance
and share part of the risk taken by the farmer (Savioli et al., 2015). This gives the
producers disposable cash to use for further cultivation and the certainty to sell the
product at the pre-arranged price (Grasseni et al., 2013). Supporting local devel-
opment leads to the boost of territorial heritage and biodiversity.
Concerning the social integration promoted by GAS, it has recently become a
central element in the alternative food network, thanks in particular to the
engagement of the SOS Rosarno organization (Oliveri, 2015). This organization
sets up alternative economic strategies and new social alliances in order to over-
come small producers’ impoverishment, migrant farmworkers’ exploitation and
racial discrimination in many Italian regions.
SOS Rosarno deliveres oranges, lemons and other products to the GAS spread in
Italy and still represents the main solution to racial exploitation in Southern Italy.
Concerning the role that GAS may play in promoting social integration, it may be
interesting to discuss the relationship between the Roman GAS Movement and
Barikamà, a cooperative set up by six migrants in 2014.
Suleman, Aboubakar, Sialiki, Modibo, Ismael and Moussa are six young men
from Mali. They crossed the desert by foot in one year; during that excruciating
journey, many of their friends and travel companions did not survive. After that,
they arrived in Libya and then they travelled by boat to finally land on the Italian
coast.
Because of its geographical position Italy, like several Mediterranean countries,
has become an unavoidable passage to escape from the migrants’ original countries.
Monzini (2007) describes the process through which these people become part of
an illegal system in Southern Italy. When they arrive in Italy, migrants are exploited
by illegal organizations: they are forced to pay for some services and are subjected
to rough treatment.
Barikama’s members (Fig. 2) were exploited in the tomato and citrus production
in South Italy, and in particular they started working in the tomato agri-business in
Puglia. There, migrants work from 8 to 12 h a day, with wages that range between
20 and 25 Euros per day, in working environments with little or no safety measures
at all (Bernaschi, 2013).
The Amnesty International Report (2014) states that migrant workers in Italy are
victims of ‘severe exploitation’ in the agricultural sector. The debilitating working
conditions lead to human rights violations and deprivation of basic capabilities,
firstly health: these people suffer from diseases related to the absence of safety
measures, malnourishment and undernourishment. Moreover, an unsecure job
determines housing conditions that are degrading from a socio-sanitary point of
view, like makeshift accommodations and overcrowding (Pugliese et al., 2012;
Bernaschi, 2013).
Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System … 11
As Brovia (2008) reported, more than 12,000 migrants work in the seasonal
harvest of tomato crop in Northern Puglia. Most of them are employed illegally
through the so-called “caporalato” system that is a gangmaster system.3
In 2006, after a decisive social pressure related to the living conditions of
migrant workers, several initiatives were started to provide an alternative response
to exploitation. One of these initiatives was promoted by the SOS Rosarno orga-
nization, which put a group of six migrants (soon to become Barikamà’s associates)
in contact with activists able to introduce them into the local food system in Central
Italy.
In January 2010, after a violent riot against exploitation and racism occurred in
Rosarno (Calabria region, Southern Italy), the six migrants moved to Rome. There,
they came across members of the Ex Snia community center and established contact
with the GAS movement (Diara et al., 2015).
Thanks to that encounter, Barikamà became a social promotion association in
order to gain legal acknowledgement. In the Bambarà language, Barikamà means
“resilience”, showing the adaptive and responsive nature of this civil society ini-
tiative. The Barikamà experience touches several points related to social inclusion:
learning a new language and a new job; community building; inclusion in the
workforce; crowdfunding; and the inclusion of Italian workers in the social coop-
erative “Barikamà”.
3
The Ethical Trading Initiative Report (2015), an alliance formed by companies and NGOs
committed to respecting the rights of the workers in the world, denounced the massive exploitation
of migrants in Southern Italy’s tomato industry and the involvement of the Mafia. As a conse-
quence, some Northern European countries have decided to boycott Italian tomatoes.
12 D. Bernaschi and G. Crisci
Fig. 3 Barikamà’s yoghurt: production and distribution. Source: Barikamà’s website http://
barikama.altervista.org/foto-e-video/, Reproduced with Creative Commons Permission
In the beginning, they relied on the African food culture (mainly based on family
livestock production) and on the knowledge gained both in their countries as well as
in Italy, so they decided to produce yogurt to be sold to farmers’ markets and to
GAS members.
GAS members gave them the opportunity to learn how to produce it with the
assistance of a local organic dairy producer who trained them. The response of the
consumers was mostly based on the willingness of several activists to test the
product and stay in contact with these migrants, so as to facilitate their integration
and develop a marketable product. Through this process, Barikamà’s migrants
learned new skills: dairy production, marketing and distribution (Fig. 3).
They presented the project “Barikamà” in the farmers’ market and during the
GAS meetings and this allowed the migrants to work in a team and to learn Italian.
Then, thanks to the support of “Casale di Martignano”, a certified organic farm,
they were able to transform their informal job into an enterprise that respected all
the sanitary requirements. In 2014, they started a social cooperative “type B”4
aiming to integrate disadvantaged people into the labour market.
According to GAS’s set of principles, farming methods should always be
organic. The migrants started to produce organic yogurt even without any formal
certification; firstly, because their customers knew that labeling is expensive for
small producers and could make them less competitive (Pimbert et al., 2006) and
secondly, because the milk they used to make the yogurt was organic.
Today, the yogurt they sell shows an organic certification since it is produced in
a fully organic dairy farm.
In 2014, Barikamà participated in a public regional competition launched by the
regional government concerning the solidarity economy and got an assisted loan of
20,000 Euros. However, since that money had to be spent before the government
4
In social co-operatives type B at least 30% of the members must be from disadvantaged groups:
people with physical and mental disability, drug and alcohol addiction; ex-convicts e.g.
Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System … 13
started the loan, the cooperative launched a crowdfunding initiative and gathered
26,000 Euros in a few months.
GAS’s support was crucial, since they loaned Barikamà a considerable amount
of money and accepted to be refunded in food products during the following years.
The competition allowed Barikamà to buy all the equipment needed to improve the
quality of their yogurt and to do home deliveries, for which they needed electric
bicycles and new refrigerators.
Therefore, Barikamà also started to work as a bike company with a project called
“Pedalatte Bio”, which literally means “organic milk cycling” to delivery milk,
yogurt and other organic dairy products in Rome. They decided to use bicycles as a
more environmentally-friendly transportation method, harmonising with
Barikamà’s meaning of resilience.
In addition, the crowdfunding initiative not only allowed the migrants to gather
the money needed but improved their network of potential partners and customers.
Consequently, they developed enough relational skills to maintain and cultivate
relationships with other associations and social entities.
Hence, Barikamà is the final output of a dense network of ties between asso-
ciations and different civil society initiatives that deal with poverty, working
exploitation and discrimination, all complying with respect for the environment.
Moreover, thanks to the skills acquired in Barikamà, many members (who only
work part-time in the cooperative) found other jobs in restaurants and farms around
Rome. Many of them were able to earn decent incomes in just a few years and even
invest in their business.
Another relevant point of this scaling-up experience is that today the social
cooperative “Barikamà” also allows Italian people affected by disabilities to work in
its staff. Barikamà has decided to employ two young Italians who suffer from
Asperger’s syndrome (a form of autism), driven by the empathy towards them.
Indeed, when the migrants arrived to Italy they were not able to communicate
due to their language and felt isolated. However, thanks to the support offered by
the solidarity networks, Barikamà has started to rise as a relevant link in a social
promotion chain, fostering the inclusion of the socially excluded.
Hence, the Italians who have Asperger’s syndrome, dealing with the coopera-
tive’s website and home deliveries, can earn money, gain new knowledge and
improve their personal skills.
Barikamà represents an outstanding demonstration of how the integrated and
reflexive civil society initiatives can positively affect the local community, by
integrating migrants and other disadvantaged people.
Recently, the Restaurant “Grandma Bistrot”, the cooperative “Barikamà” and the
organic farm “Casale di Martignano” decided to participate together in a public
competition to run an organic local café. Thanks to their perseverance and appeal to
the institutional initiatives, they won the competition and are about to open the café
in a former Mafia store requisitioned by the authorities. The organic café is located
in Parco Nemorense, a town park in Rome whose conservation is managed by
Barikamà together with the other business partners.
14 D. Bernaschi and G. Crisci
6 Findings
Following what was said in the previous paragraph, the Barikamà project is scaling
up and attempts to combine several development dimensions.
Indeed, the collaboration between the GAS movement and Barikamà in Rome
shows an interesting example of how civil society organizations may cope with
poverty reduction, social integration, sustainability and local development.
GAS and Barikamà are what Isin (2009) called an “act of citizenship”, namely a
social act that facilitates the transition from the status of “citizen, foreigner, out-
sider” to that of a “citizen activist”, who demands his rights and exercises his
capability for voice (Bonvin et al., 2013).
This study has three aims. Firstly, it tries to understand whether and how
Barikamà contributes to reducing poverty. Barikamà as a project is based on a deep
synergy and interdependence between different types of civil society actors moved
by solidarity in terms of responsibility towards society.
Thanks to these interconnected relationships and thanks to a reflexive approach
adopted, Barikamà started to rise as a new entity. The cooperative provides sub-
sistence income to the migrants. In addition, through the solidarity networks the
migrants found other supplementary jobs.
Secondly, it tries to comprehend the role played by Barikamà in contributing to
the social inclusion of migrants and disadvantaged people through environmentally
friendly projects. The primary purpose of Barikamà is to allow a gradual inclusion
of migrants by developing several working skills. Indeed, Barikamà members
started working and developing skills related to organic yoghurt production.
Consequently, Barikamà represents a means through which migrants and the two
young Italians with disabilities can improve their professional skills and be
employed.
Thirdly, it tries to assess how reflexivity works in the relationships between
Barikamà and the GAS movement as discussion and sharing of knowledges.
Starting from their common attempt to support a more sustainable food system,
Barikamà decided to produce organic food to be delivered on bicycles.
Furthermore, the cooperative fosters local development: e.g. the conservation of
Parco Nemorense, running the confiscated Mafia store.
Barikamà as a “development project” allows us to understand how the synergies
between the different social initiatives are crucial and how civil society is creative in
dealing with new and complex issues. However, reflecting on the migrants’ social
cooperative, the collaboration with the public institutions seems pivotal as it has
allowed the early project to get expanded and strengthened.
In other words, civil society organizations may play a strategic role in the
transition towards a more democratic and sustainable food system. Nevertheless, as
Leonardi (2001) stated, they need to establish a dialectical relationship with the
institutions to reinforce their role and to become more important. At the same time,
public institutions should underpin and be inspired by the innovative projects led by
Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System … 15
those initiatives that are strongly linked to community life. Hence, this paper
provides evidence of why it is opportune to foster virtuous synergies between civil
society initiatives and the public institutions.
7 Conclusion
This paper, starting from a holistic vision of the world in terms of interconnected
and interdependent phenomena (Capra & Luisi, 2014), suggests analyzing food
security in its multidimensional dimension. An all-encompassing comprehension of
the problem is possible only by deleting the dichotomy “production-consumption”
and by broadening the assessment towards: e.g. poverty reduction, environmental
issues and social integration. With this in mind, the concept of a “democratic and
sustainable food system” has been considered as more suitable to address the topic.
Moreover, a strong local and global coordination as well as a reflexive approach
is required in order to analyze the matter extensively. This paper assesses the
growing civic engagement around food through its reflexive nature of promoting a
wide social participation, debate and cooperation for the solution of shared social
problems.
This deliverable aims to deal with those civil society initiatives that contribute to
a more democratic and sustainable food system. On account of this, it focuses on
the solidarity purchase groups and their relationships with the migrants’ cooperative
“Barikamà” in Rome. That experience allows us to spotlight three relevant
considerations:
Firstly, civil society initiatives are highlighted. Thanks to a deep knowledge of
the social realities to which they are linked, they are able to develop creative,
dynamic and reflexive measures to address poverty, social integration and
sustainability.
Secondly, those initiatives represent a form in which individuals take care of the
world as a form of responsibility towards society, fostering relationships instead of
exclusions.
Lastly, civil society initiatives based on dense networks of solidarity ties may
play a strategic role in the transition towards a more democratic and sustainable
food system. Nevertheless, in order to matter they need to come out of the niche
dimension. This can be done by building an interconnected collaboration with
public institutions.
This paper provides evidence of why social issues to be addressed require more
than just a fertile civic ground. Indeed, an involvement of public institutions seems
necessary in supporting the civic society initiatives (e.g. the legal acknowledgement
received by the GAS movement in 2007 or the financial support received by the
Barikamà cooperative) and in assuming an active role in tackling new and complex
social issues.
16 D. Bernaschi and G. Crisci
References
Amnesty International. (2014). Exploited labour two years on: the “Rosarno Law” fails to protect
migrants exploited in the agricultural sector in Italy. London, UK: Amnesty International
Publication.
Arcuri, S., Brunori, G., Bartolini, F., & Galli, F. (2015, June). “La sicurezza alimentare come
diritto: per un approccio sistemico.” Agriregionieuropa, Year 11 (Vol. 41).
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, UK: SAGE.
Beck, U. (2003). La società cosmopolita. Prospettive dell’epoca postnazionale. Bologna, Italia: Il
Mulino.
Bernaschi, D. (2013). Analisi delle condizioni di vita e di lavoro dei migranti nell’area del
Casertano. Tra sfruttamento lavorativo e privazioni delle basic capabilities. Master’s thesis in
Human Development Economics.
Bonvin, J. M., Dif-Pradalier, M., & Moachon, E. (2013). A capability approach to restructuring
processes, lessons from a Swiss and a French case study. Lausanne, Switzerland: CESCAP,
University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland.
Brovia, C. (2008). In the iron grip of the Caporali: seasonal workers on tomato farms in Apulia;
Sous La Férule Des Caporali. Les Saisonniers De La Tomate Dans Les Pouilles. Etudes
Rurales, 182(2), 153–166.
Burchi, F., De Muro, P. (2012). A human development and capability approach to food security:
Conceptual framework and informational basis. United Nations Development Programme, WP
2012-009, February 2012.
Campiglio, L., & Rovati, G. (2009). La povertà alimentare in Italia: Prima indagine quantitativa e
qualitativa. Milano, Italia: Guerini e associati.
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The system view of life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press.
Coldiretti. (2014). Crisi: Coldiretti, spesa di gruppo per 2, 7 mln italiani (+400%). Retrieved June
21, 2017 from http://www.coldiretti.it/News/Pagine/672–%E2%80%93-12-Ottobre-2014.aspx.
Crespi, F. (1994). Imparare ad esistere. Nuovi fondamenti della solidarietà sociale. Roma, Italia:
Donzelli.
Crespi, F. (2013). Esistenza-come-realtà. Contro il predominio dell’economia. Salerno, Italia:
Orthotes.
Crisci, G., & Fonte, M. (2014). L’accesso al bio nella transizione verso la sostenibilità dei sistemi
agro-alimentari. Agriregionieuropa, year 10(37).
Daily, G., et al. (1998). Food production: Population growth, and the environment. Science, 281,
12–91.
Dahrendorf, R. (1998). Il conflitto sociale nella modernità. Roma-Bari, Italia: Editori Laterza.
Diara, S., Crisci, G., & Fonte, M. (2015). “Barikamà: resistance through food”. In Proceedings of
Second International Conference on Agriculture in an Urbanizing Society: Reconnecting
Agriculture and Food Chains to Societal Needs, 14–15 September 2015. Rome, Italy.
Dowler, E., & Lambie-Mumford, H. (2015). Introduction: Hunger, food and social policy in
austerity. Social Policy and Society, 14(3), 411–415.
Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (1989). Hunger and public action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Duncan, J. (2015). Greening global food governance. Canadian Food Studies, 2(2), 335–344.
Edwards, R., Ranson, S., & Strain, M. (2002). Reflexivity: Towards a theory of lifelong learning.
International Journal Lifelong Education, 21(6), 525–536.
Ethical Trading Initiative. (2015). Due diligence in agricultural supply chains: Counteracting
exploitation of migrant workers in Italian tomato production. Joint Ethical Trading Initiatives,
Norway.
Eurostat. (2015). People at risk of poverty or social exclusion. Retrieved July 21, 2017 from http://
ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/People_at_risk_of_poverty_or_social_
exclusion.
Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System … 17
Feindt, P. (2010). Reflexive governance of global public goods: multi-level and multi-referential
governance in agriculture policy. In Brousseau, E., et al. (Eds.), Reflexive governance for
public goods. Boston, USA: MIT Press.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (1996). Rome declaration on world food security and world
food summit plan of action. In Proceedings of World Summit on Food Security, FAO. Rome,
Italy.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2006). World agriculture: Towards 2030/2050 Interim report
prospects for food, nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups. Interim Report, FAO:
Rome, Italy.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013a). Food wastage footprint. Impacts on natural
resources. Summary Report, FAO. Rome, Italy.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013b). Food balance sheets. Statistics Division, Rome,
Italy. Retrieved July 21, 2017 from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS/visualize.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2015). The state of food insecurity in the world 2015.
Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: Taking stock of uneven progress. Report, FAO.
Rome, Italy.
Fonte, M., & Salvioni. (2013). Cittadinanza ecologica e consumo sostenibile: dal biologico ai
Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale. In Corrado, A., & Sivini, S. (Eds.), Cibo locale. Percorsi
innovativi nelle pratiche di produzione e consumo alimentare. Napoli, Italy: Liguori.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, J. I., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., et al.
(2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327, 812–818.
Goodman, D., & DuPuis, E. M. (2002). Knowing food and growing food: Beyond the production–
consumption debate in the sociology of agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(1), 5–22.
Gottschick, M. (2013). Reflexive capacity in local networks for sustainable development:
integrating conflict and understanding into a multi-level perspective transition framework.
Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 1–22.
Grasseni, C., Forno, F., & Signori, S. (2013). Beyond alternative food networks an agenda for
comparative analysis of Italy’s solidarity purchase groups (GAS) and districts of solidarity
economy (DES) vis-à-vis US Community Economies. In Proceedings of UNRISD Conference,
Potential and Limits of Social and Solidarity Economy. Geneva, Switzerland, 6–8 May 2013.
Guthman, J. (2007). The polanyan way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode,
39(3), 456–478.
Hazell, P., & Wood, S. (2008). Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society B, 363, 495–515.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change, impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Retrieved June 21, 2017
from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/.
Isin, E. F. (2009). Citizenship in flux: The figure of the activist citizen. In Subjectivity, 29, 367–
388.
Keane, J. (2003). Global civil society?. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lang, T., & Barling, D. (2012). Food security and food sustainability: Reformulating the debate.
The Geographical Journal, 178(4), 313–326.
Leonardi, L. (2001). La dimensione sociale della globalizzazione. Rome, Italy: Carocci.
Lush, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, Cambridge.
Magatti, M. (2005). Il potere istituente della società civile. Rome, Italy: Laterza.
Maino F., Lodi Rizzini, C., & Bandera, L. (2016). Povertà alimentare in Italia: le risposte del
secondo welfare. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
Maslen, C., Raffle, A., Marriott, S., & Smith, N. (2013). Food poverty: What does the evidence tell
us? Food Poverty Report, Bristol City Council, Bristol, UK.
Marsden, T. (2013). From post-productionism to reflexive governance: Contested transitions in
securing more sustainable food futures. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 123–134.
Marsden, T., & Sonnino, R. (2012). Human health and wellbeing and the sustainability of
urban-regional food systems. Current Opinion Environmental Sustainability, 4(4), 427–430.
18 D. Bernaschi and G. Crisci
Monzini, P. (2007). Sea-border crossings: The organization of irregular migration to Italy. Journal
of Mediterranean politics, 12(2), 163–184.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s)
of local innovation. Urban Studies (Vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 1969–1990), October 2005.
Oliveri, F. A. (2015). Network of resistances against a multiple crisis: SOS Rosarno and the
experimentation of socio-economic alternative models. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8(2), 504–
529.
Pimbert, M., Tran-Thanh, K., Deléage, E., Reinert, M., Trehet, C., & Bennet, E. (2006). Farmers’
views on the future of food and small scale producers. London, UK: International Institute for
Environment and Development.
Pugliese, E., de Filippo, E., De Stefano, D., Dolente, F., Oliviero, L., & Pisacane, L. (2012). Diritti
Violati, Indagine sulle condizioni di vita dei lavoratori immigrati in aree rurali del Sud Italia e
sulle violazioni dei loro diritti umani e sociali. Napoli, Italy: Dedalus Cooperativa.
Pulcini, E. (2009). La cura del mondo. Paura e responsabilità nell’età globale. Torino, Italy:
Bollati Boringhieri.
Renting, H., Marsden, T. K., & Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks:
Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and
Planning, 35, 393–411.
Retegas. (1999). Documento base dei GAS. I Gruppi di Acquisto Solidali. Un modo diverso di fare
la spesa. Retrieved June 21, 2017 from www.retegas.org/upload/dl/doc/GASDocumentoBase.
pdf.
Savioli, A., Crisci, G., & Fonte, M. (2015). Il Papavero: The butterfly laboratory and the financial
strength of solidarity economy. In Proceedings of Second International Conference on
Agriculture in an Urbanizing Society: Reconnecting Agriculture and Food Chains to Societal
Needs, 14–15 September 2015. Rome, Italy.
Schifani, G., & Migliore, G. (2011). Solidarity purchase groups and the new critical and ethical
consumer trends: First result of a direct study in Sicily. New Medit, 11(3), 26–33.
Sen, A. K. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford, UK:
Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. K. (1995). Inequality reexamined. Harvard, USA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2000a). Freedom, rationality, and social choice: The arrow lectures and other essays.
Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2000b). Food entitlements and agricultural production. In Proceedings of Doctoral
Lecture, 30 November 2000. University of Florence, Italy.
Sen, A. K. (2012). The snakes and ladders of europe. The economic system we need, 10 May 2012.
Shetty, P. (2015). From food security to food and nutrition security: Role of agriculture and
farming systems for nutrition. Current Science, 109(3), 456–461.
Sonnino, R., Moragues Faus, A., & Maggio, A. (2014). Sustainable food security: An emerging
research and policy agenda. International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 21
(1), 173–188.
Sonnino, R. (2016). The new geography of food security: Exploring the potential of urban food
strategies. The Geographical Journal, 182(2), 190–200.
Sonnino, R., & Hanmer, O. (2016). Beyond food provision: Understanding community growing in
the context of food poverty. Geoforum, 74, 213–221.
Stirling, A. (2009). Direction, distribution and diversity! pluralising progress in innovation,
sustainability and development. In STEPS Working Paper 32. Brighton, UK: STEPS Centre,
University of Sussex.
United Nations. (1974). Universal Declaration on the Eradication of Hunger and Malnutrition. In
World Food Conference General Assembly, 5–16 November 1974. Rome, Italy.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In
70th Session of the General Assembly United Nations, 25–27 September 2015, United Nations
Headquarters. New York, USA.
Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System … 19
Daniela Bernaschi is a development economist and Ph.D candidate in Political and Social Change
at the University of Turin and Florence, Italy. She deals with food insecurity in Europe and the role
played by civil society organizations, using the Capability Approach by Amartya Sen. She is
currently visiting student at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain.
Giacomo Crisci is a development economist and MSc candidate in Food, Space and Society at
Cardiff University, United Kingdom. He is lecturer in the Master of Arts in Food Studies at the
American University of Rome. His work is centred around the solidarity purchase groups in Italy
and the challenge of scaling up social and solidarity economy.
We would like to thank Dr. George Baourakis and Prof. Konstadinos Mattas for organizing the
158th EAAE Seminar on Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture for which this article has been
written.
We are particularly grateful to our colleague Ms. Benedetta Tavani, who commented on an early
draft of this article. Special thanks also to Gabriella, Luigi, Elisabetta and Francesca for their
inestimable support.
The usual disclaimer applies.
Role of Buffalo Production
in Sustainable Development of Rural
Regions
Ibrahim Soliman
Abstract Rice is the main summer crop in Egypt. It is a cash exportable crop that
provides a main source of income to the Egyptian farmers and the national econ-
omy. However, the farmers used to burn the rice straw at the farm borders and
violate the law that forbids such action, which causes socio-economic negative
externalities due to the generated smoke from burning. The smoke generated from
burning is straw produced as byproduct of cultivated around 0.75 million ha of rice
crop in Egypt, causes social costs due to the probability of premature-mortality and
morbidity of rural and urban individuals and livestock. To conduct an economic
assessment of such negative externalities a field research was conducted. A targeted
ration of chopped rice-straw mixed with dissolved urea and molasses at 2% and 3%
of weight, respectively, was fed to buffalo-feeder calves for meat production at 40%
of the S.E. of the daily ration with a concentrate feed mix of 60% S.E. Such ration
was compared with a control ration of dray chopped rice straw with the same
proportion of concentrate feed mix. Two feed-response models were estimated for
comparison of the two rations on the growth of the buffalo feeder calves for meat
production. The Cobb-Douglas response function was the best fitted form according
to the economic logic, significance of estimated parameters and the magnitude of
R-2. The study derived the production elasticity, marginal daily gain, the value of
marginal product from both estimated feed response functions. The economic
marketing weight that maximizes the gross margin above the feed costs was esti-
mated under the response model of treat rice straw feeding plan (targeted ration). It
reached around 518 Kg live weight, while under the control ration it was only
around 384 Kg. The larger market weight of treated rice straw ration was due to
higher production elasticity, faster marginal daily gain, better marginal feed con-
version and higher palatability of the ration than the control one. Egypt imports of
red meat reached about 600 million dollars, due to lack of sufficient feed supply that
constrained expansion in red meat production. Therefore, providing treated rice
straw feed would provide additional source of livestock feeds which would provide
additional 80,000 tons’ carcass weight from fed buffalo calves, which currently are
I. Soliman (&)
Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
e-mail: [email protected]
LIBRARY OF THE OF
The text on this page is estimated to be only 29.00%
accurate
CHRISTOPH BECK
The text on this page is estimated to be only 27.00%
accurate
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
textbookfull.com