0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

A Critique On The Effects of Omega

The document critiques a study on the effects of Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on critically ill COVID-19 patients, highlighting its positive outcomes in improving survival rates and respiratory function. However, it points out significant limitations in the study's methodology, including a small sample size, lack of diversity, and short duration of treatment. The critique emphasizes the need for more comprehensive research with diverse participants and longer monitoring to better understand the effects of Omega-3 supplementation.

Uploaded by

BLACK ROSE
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

A Critique On The Effects of Omega

The document critiques a study on the effects of Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on critically ill COVID-19 patients, highlighting its positive outcomes in improving survival rates and respiratory function. However, it points out significant limitations in the study's methodology, including a small sample size, lack of diversity, and short duration of treatment. The critique emphasizes the need for more comprehensive research with diverse participants and longer monitoring to better understand the effects of Omega-3 supplementation.

Uploaded by

BLACK ROSE
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

A Critique on the Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Covid-19 Patients 1

A Critique on the Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Covid-19 Patients

Name

Institution

Course

Date
A Critique on the Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Covid-19 Patients 2

The onset of the coronavirus served as a wake-up call, especially to the world and

precisely to the medical field. The research field for contagious diseases had been abandoned,

and most medical researchers focused on major diseases such as cancer and HIV, as is evident in

the discoveries that have been made in these fields (Cioti, 2020). In the article "The Effect of

Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Clinical and Biochemical Parameters of Critically Ill

Patients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial" by Dr. Doaei and his colleagues, they

have done thorough research on the effects of acid supplementation on COVID-19 patients. The

article indeed is a marvel and has proven beyond that indeed the Omega-3 fatty acid

supplementation improved the chances of living of the patients (Doaei, 2021), however, some

limitations do present themselves in the method of data collection the individuals chosen for the

trial and not to mention the study was only limited to a small area.

Dr. Doaei and his team conducted the study at Razi hospital in Iran and only had

128participants. The volunteers had to meet certain criteria to participate in the study. First, they

had no history of cardiovascular or lung disease or malignant malignancies and no seafood

hypersensitivity. The participants were divided into three groups, each receiving a different dose

and form of treatment. The first batch received 1000 mg omega-3 containing 400 mg EPAs and

200 mg DHAs, the second received n3-PUFAs, and the third received dietary assistance. All

treatments lasted 14 days. The results showed the intervention group's survival rate and

parameters were higher than the control group. Blood sugar and albumin didn't differ across

groups. The study showed that Omega-3 supplements affected the measured parameters. It

improved respiratory and renal function in critically ill COVID-19 patients.


A Critique on the Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Covid-19 Patients 3

The research done was thorough and produced positive results; there was an added

advantage in giving Covid 19 patients fatty acid supplements. Regardless the study still

portrayed a lot of weaknesses in data collection and duration of the study. The researchers had

less than three months to collect and analyze their data, not to mention the treatments of the

participants only took fourteen days. The monitoring of patients during research is important as it

gives the researchers time to determine even the long-term effects of the drug to be introduced

(Hudson, 1995). The research also focused on participants from a specific age group and area.

The participants had to be between the age of 35-85 years. This proves that the supplement may

only work for people in this age group. Medical research requires a lot of diversity for effective

results (Stanford, 2020). The article also focused a lot on people with no underlying conditions;

the limited time of the research probably didn't allow for further study of the effects of the

supplements on other people but do the supplements also work for people with underlying

conditions? The research was limited to a specific sample size and criteria to be met, leaving a

lot of room for misinterpretation of the results (Vick, 2018).

The researchers did an amazing job regardless of the limited resources and not to mention

time; however, for future medical research, time as a resource should be prioritized, and diverse

sample sizes and areas should also be considered for the best results. (Doaei, 2021)
A Critique on the Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Covid-19 Patients 4

References

Ciotti, M., Ciccozzi, M., Terrinoni, A., Jiang, W. C., Wang, C. B., & Bernardini, S. (2020). The

COVID-19 pandemic. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences, 57(6), 365-388.

Does S, Gholami S, Rastgoo S, Gholamalizadeh M, Bourbour F, Bagheri SE, Samipoor F,

Akbari ME, Shadnoush M, Ghorat F, Mosavi Jarrahi SA. The effect of omega-3 fatty

acid supplementation on clinical and biochemical parameters of critically ill patients with

COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of translational medicine. 2021

Dec;19(1):1-9.

Hudson, L. D., Milberg, J. A., Anardi, D., & Maunder, R. J. (1995). Clinical risks for

development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. American journal of respiratory

and critical care medicine, 151(2), 293-301.

Stanford, F. C. (2020). The importance of diversity and inclusion in the healthcare

workforce. Journal of the National Medical Association, 112(3), 247-249.

Vick, A. D., Baugh, A., Lambert, J., Vanderbilt, A. A., Ingram, E., Garcia, R., & Baugh, R. F.

(2018). Levers of change: a review of contemporary interventions to enhance diversity in

medical schools in the USA. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 9, 53.

You might also like