1
Fallacies and Ads: A Better Story than Twilight
A few decades ago if we needed information, we had to go for radio news, newspapers,
magazines, and so on, and we had complete control over what information we wanted to receive
and what information we didn't want to receive. Cut to 2022, and this right somewhat has been
taken away from us, and the icing on the cake is that we have no control over the
information, since we are regularly fed with twisted news and propaganda through our social
media and even mainstream media without even realizing it. As a result, there is a lack of critical
thinking and fact-checking among people, and they cannot even differentiate between what is
fallacious news and what is not, and advertisements have taken full advantage of this loophole.
Thus, this paper aims to educate readers on the prevalence of fallacies, particularly in
commercials, as well as the ethical aspects of using fallacies in advertisements, and ultimately, to
provide potential countermeasures against fallacious information.
Before we get into advertising fallacies, let's take a glance at how prevalent fallacies are
in general. According to an article by Musi & Reed (2022), 59 percent of fake news during the
COVID-19 epidemic period was not fabricated, but rather presented in a misleading context. The
authors also say in the article that at that period, news about vaccines and symptoms of the
COVID-19 virus was being reconfigured, which in a crisis scenario, contributed to a lot more
anxious environment among the people. The article also quotes a statement by Tedros Adhanom
Ghebreyesus, then-WHO Director General, who stated that the globe was not only facing an
epidemic but also an infodemic during the Covid-19 outbreak. This remark from the WHO
director has a lot of depth to it, and it can be used to sum up the entire situation in the context of
the misleading information that surrounds us. This research does not address false news since
2
fake news is something that everybody can spot; rather, this research focuses on reconfigurable
news, which is extremely difficult to identify and avoid.
Now it's time to talk about fallacies in advertisement. For this, let's examine an Indian
advertisement of Vimal Elaichi, which can be found in the video by Elaichi (2022), which
includes two major fallacies. Beginning with the advertisement's breakdown, this advertising
features two of the most well-known actors in Hindi film, Mr. Ajay Devgan and Mr. Shahrukh
Khan, who are promoting the Vimal Elaichi as a product. According to an article by Petric
(2020), appeal to authority occurs when a claim is made utilizing a person's position of authority,
which is exactly the situation in this advertising where famous actors are used to establish the
credibility of the product.
Moving on to the commercial's other fallacy, which is both interesting and well-hidden. If
you look attentively at the advertisement, at the end you will notice a picture of the product,
which is Vimal Elaichi, but if you search for Vimal Gutkha in the market or on the internet, you
will find a packaging that is similar to Vimal Elaichi. To put this in context, Vimal Gutkha is a
tobacco-containing product, and advertising of such products is prohibited in India. As a result,
the company cleverly uses Vimal Elaichi as a foreground product without the actors mentioning
the name elaichi anywhere in the advertisement, and puts the tobacco-containing product in a
similar packaging, causing people to assume that the actors use the tobacco-containing product.
According to Petric (2020), such fallacy is known as the Red herring fallacy, in which the
audience is misled by diverting the course of information at hand to make it easier for the
presenter to convey the information, but ultimately leading to the presenter's indented topic. As
previously explained, this is the identical scenario for Vimal Elaichi's commercial.
3
After discussing all of the points mentioned in the previous paragraphs, like the false
news that surrounds us and an example of Indian advertising that is full of fallacies, many people
can be left with the question: Is it truly unethical to use fallacies in advertisements? To answer
this topic, let us explore an article by Ripley (2005), which provides examples of numerous
advertisements with fallacies, but separates them into two categories: ethical fallacious
commercials and unethical fallacious commercials. To get a clearer picture, let's compare two
commercials from the same article by Ripley (2005), one of which is from ethical fallacious
advertisement and the other is from unethical fallacious advertisement.
To begin, there is the example of "Ethical Fallacious Advertisement," which is a Pepsi
commercial in which the article claims that the advertisement reflects friendship, connection, and
youthfulness between a school girl and the drink, despite the fact that there is no mention of the
nature of the product, such as taste, quality, etc., which is a fallacy in itself, but it does not depict
anything wrong or immoral. Thus, this commercial is classified as ethical. Furthermore,
according to the same article, another advertisement that falls under the category of unethically
fallacious advertising is the commercial for Jordache Clothing, which reflects an offensive
condition between a man and a woman, where the chastising male is shown, which can be
threatening and offensive to many people. As a result, the author of the article considers such
advertisement to be unethically fallacious. The author also emphasizes at the conclusion of the
article that fallacies that reflect unfair, harmful, and hazardous reasoning can be considered
unethical. Overall, the main idea of this argument is that while utilizing fallacies in ads is not
immoral in itself, the manner in which they are presented can be kept under ethically
consideration.
4
As the saying goes "Easier said than done,”. Nitpicking problems in a crisis is easy for us,
but offering meaningful and significant solutions to the problem is quite difficult. However, the
purpose of this study is to discuss the issue as well as potential solutions to mitigate it. An article
by Walton (2010) explains how to avoid fallacies and manipulation by stating that even if the
information appears to be true, one should not leap to conclusions too early. Instead, one should
do an analysis of the offered explanation before drawing a judgment. In a similar manner, Musi
& Reed (2022) in their article propose that a systematic approach should be developed to
automate the identification and detention of fallacies using software and bots, as well as educate
individuals on how to recognize fallacies by making them their own fact checkers. These two
potential solutions for countering fallacies are not specific to fallacies in advertising, but they can
certainly be adapted to countering fallacies in advertisements as well.
Allow me to set aside all facts and evidence for a moment and express my own opinion
on the subject. According to Ripley (2015), if the advertisement's fallacies aren't biased or
harmful, it can be considered ethical. I have a similar opinion on this topic, since I consider using
fallacies in a creative and entertaining manner is a skill. I believe it is OK to use fallacies in
advertisements as long as they do not hurt people's sentiments. And in response to the argument
that fallacies mislead people, rather than prohibiting the use of healthy fallacies, individuals
should be educated and taught not to confuse reality with creative fallacies.
From beginning to conclusion this paper seeks to unfold everything in the context of this
issue. This research covers it all: proving the prevalence of fallacies, examples of fallacies in
commercials, ethical considerations for the use of fallacies in advertising, possible solutions, and
my personal opinion. The primary goal of this study was to inform readers on the current state of
advertising fallacies, as well as fallacies in general. However, more research is recommended in
5
order to dig up more facts and evidences for this topic, which will help people become more
aware of fallacies and how to distinguish between fallacies and facts in advertisements, making
commercials more entertaining and at the same time making it informative as well, and only then
it can truly be said that "Fallacies and Ads: A Better Story than Twilight."
6
References
Ripley, M.L. (2005). Arguing For the Ethics of an Ad: An Application of Multi-Modal
Argumentation Theory. OSSA Conference Archive, 47.
http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA6/papers/47
Petric, D. (2020). Logical Fallacies. The Knot Theory of Mind.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24781.18401/1
Musi, E., & Reed, C. (2022). From fallacies to semi-fake news: Improving the identification of
misinformation triggers across digital media. Discourse & Society.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221076609
Walton, D. (2010). Why Fallacies Appear to Be Better Arguments than They Are. Informal
Logic, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v30i2.2868
Elaichi, V. (2021, March 20). Vimal Elaichi - Ajay Devgn | Shahrukh Khan | Hindi 60 secs
[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUoJRZgJ-ZE