Iron AgeMegalithic Remains in Kollam District, Kerala
Iron AgeMegalithic Remains in Kollam District, Kerala
Abstract: Megalithism, or huge-stone burial practice, is a significant cultural practice worldwide. Its
varied manifestations have been available in different cultural contexts since the late stone age. The
Megalithic practice in Kerala is associated with the early Iron Age, which shares many characteristics
with their counterparts in the Indian subcontinent. The Megalithic burial monuments and associated
materials are the distinctive landmarks of the Iron Age in Kerala, while there is a lack of clear-cut
evidence of habitation or settlement. The State of Kerala produces evidence of a wide variety of Megalithic
monuments, especially in the north Kerala region. A significant share of Megalithic sites found in
southern Kerala has been accidentally discovered. The majority of the southern part of Kerala is
unexplored, and a detailed database of sites is not available. Kollam district in south Kerala is one such
area where minimal research has been conducted on Megaliths. The present paper attempts to document
the Megalithic monuments in this region and identify their typology, distribution and characteristic
features with the help of a full-coverage village-to-village survey.
Keywords: Urn, Cist, Menhir, Iron Age, Excavations, Burial Typology, Distribution
Introduction
The term ‘Megaliths’ refers to the monuments built of large stones. The term has a
restricted usage and is applied only to a particular class of monuments or structures,
which are built of large stones and have some grave-like, commemorative or ritualistic
association. The Indian Megalithic burials and monuments generally belong to the Iron
Age and are largely sepulchral in character. However, the sepulchral aspect of this
tradition was not a new feature of the Iron Age, the antiquity of burial practices in
India is dated back to the Mesolithic period (Allchin and Allchin 1982), and the marked
burials began to appear in the Neolithic period. During the Neolithic and Chalcolithic
periods, the tradition of burying the dead continued to exist in different parts of the
Indian subcontinent as an antecedent stage of Megalithism (Rajan 1994). This tradition
became widely popular during the Iron Age, mostly in the southern part of India and
Kumar et al. 2021-22: 270-287
to some extent in northern India, and it continued to survive even during the historical
and up to modern times in a few pockets of central, southern and north-eastern India.
Colonel Colin Mackenzie noticed the Megalithic culture in India and accidentally
found some Megalithic remains in Karnataka (Paddayya 2006). In 1823, Babington
published for the first time an account of the Megalithic tombs he had excavated in the
Malabar region in Kerala. It was followed by a host of explorations and excavations by
various agencies and scholars, for which reviews are available (Peter 2002; Darsana
2010; Abhayan 2018). The Megalithic period in Kerala is represented largely by burials,
but habitation evidence is almost unavailable. Apart from the burial types found in the
other southern Indian States, the northern Kerala region exhibits unique types of
laterite-made burial architecture, such as rock-cut chambers, umbrella stones,
capstones, and hood stones.
Despite the presence of Megalithic burials and the strategic location of Kollam, this
region has received limited attention from the point of view of Megalithic/Iron Age
research. In the Kollam district, 35 Megalithic sites (excavated and explored) were
reported previously. Mangadu is one of the important excavated sites in the Kollam
district. The cultural assemblage of the urn burial site at Mangadu belongs without any
doubt to the Megalithic order of south India, but the monument is different in many
respects from its counterparts in other places. The Megalithic monuments at Mangadu
consisted of 28 hard, compact and uneven laterite blocks within an area of
approximately 10 × 10 metres (Satyamurthy 1992). The radiocarbon determinations
from the Megalithic burial of Mangadu, Kollam district of Kerala are cal BC 1299- 902
(100%) (BS-958), and cal BC 1289- 1282 (0.37%) cal BC 1269- 821 (99.63%) (BS-957)
(Satyamurthy 1992; Abhayan 2018). This is the earliest date assigned to the Megalithic
burials in Kerala so far. Other excavated sites in Kollam are Poredam (Rajendran 1993),
Valiyapadam (IAR 1989-1990: 45), Arippa (Rajendran and Badam 1995), Karimpalur
(IAR 1991-1992: 126), and Thazhuthala (The Hindu 2009) (Table 1). The reports of the
excavations, except Mangadu, are preliminary in nature. Hence, detailed information
on contexts, burial architecture, and material remains is not available. The major
Megalithic burial type reported from Kollam is urn burials, which are followed by
cists, menhirs, dolmens and stone circles. Beads of semiprecious stone and glass, bone
pieces, metal objects (iron, copper and gold), and pottery (Black and Red Ware, Red
Ware and Black Polished Ware) (Rajendran 1993) were unearthed from these burials
(Table 1). Recently, Megalithic cists have been excavated in the Pathanamthitta district,
which is a neighbouring district of Kollam (Abhayan et al. 2021; Ambily 2021b).
271
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 9: 2021-22
coordinates
Monument
References
Materials
Reported
from the
Type of
Sl. No
Taluk
Sites
Geo-
Site
The reported Megalithic remains from Kollam are mostly discovered accidentally.
Hence, limited information is available on their burial monument typology and
distribution. The sites are reported in various journals, books, newspapers, Indian
Archaeology – A Review, etc. In many cases, not only are the geo-coordinates not given
but even details such as distance and direction from the nearest village and the name of
the district are not provided. As a result of the detailed survey of the published works
on the Megalithic remains of Kollam, a total of 35 reported sites were documented
(Table 2). These 35 sites include the recent explorations by Vinuraj (2016), which
reported 11 new Megalithic sites in the Kollam district (Table 2).
272
Kumar et al. 2021-22: 270-287
Geo-coordinates
Monuments
References
Materials
Reported
Reporter
Type of
Sl. No.
Site
273
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 9: 2021-22
274
Kumar et al. 2021-22: 270-287
29.2416”
26 Villumala N 09° 03’ Urn burial Urn burial Vinuraj Vinuraj
44.32” 2016: 89
E 76° 58’
14.43”
27 Abhayagiri N 08° 57’ Urn burial Urn burial Vinuraj Vinuraj
48” 2016: 90
E 77° 02’
16”
28 Pullupara N 08° 57’ Menhir Vinuraj Vinuraj
33” 2016: 91
E 76° 36’
33”
29 Verukuzhy N 09° 03’ Cist Vinuraj Vinuraj
52” 2016: 92
E 76° 58’
50”
*The term ‘Topikallu’ is used for referring to stone slab in the published sources.
Recent Explorations
In order to document the Megalithic vestiges of the Kollam district, the first author
conducted a systematic village-to-village survey in the Kollam district as part of the
PhD programme and Kerala Megalithic Gazetteer Project. For the study, 1347 localities
(in 64 Grama Panchayath and 6 Municipalities) were subjected to a village-to-village
survey. The recent explorations conducted in the study area revealed 58 new
Megalithic sites (Figure1). Out of 35 previously reported Megalithic sites, only 16 sites
were visited in the present survey. The rest of the previously reported sites were either
destroyed or still untraceable due to the lack of geo-coordinates. However, as a result
of recent surveys, the number of Megalithic sites in the study area increased from 35 to
93. Most of the burial monuments discovered from the survey are in destroyed
condition. Geo-coordinates of previously reported sites are provided only for those
that have been revisited (Table 2). Many previously documented sites are destroyed
and hence no Megalithic remains were found, or local residents are unaware of the
existence of Megaliths.
In this recent exploration, the common type of Megalithic remains encountered in the
Kollam district is urn burials (24) and cist burials (24) and is followed by menhirs (8)
and stone circles (2). Most of the Megalithic sites were reported from Pathanapuram
(29) and are followed by Punalur (12), Kottarakkara (11), and Kollam (6) taluks (Table
3). The Megalithic sites were not discovered in Karunagapally and Kunnathur taluks in
the Kollam district (Arun Kumar et al. 2021).
Cist Burials
From the study area, 24 cist burial sites were discovered. Most of the cist burials are
reported from Pathanapuram (18) and are followed by Punalur (4) and Kottarakkara
275
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 9: 2021-22
(2). The cist burials of the Kollam district are mostly located in the hilly areas and 78 m
to 170 m above the mean sea level. The granite/charnockite formations can be seen in
the areas where the cists are located.
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Pathanapuram Punalur Kottarakkara Kollam
Menhirs 0 6 2 0
Cist Burials 18 4 2 0
Urn Burials 11 2 7 4
Stone Circles 0 0 0 2
276
Kumar et al. 2021-22: 270-287
277
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 9: 2021-22
278
Kumar et al. 2021-22: 270-287
Urn Burials
The urns (Nannangadi)are the most common type of Megalithic burial in the Kollam
district. Urns are usually low-quality Red Wares. Even though they are huge enough to
accommodate skeletal remains, they appear to be used for secondary burial purposes.
The urns are covered with terracotta lids or stone slabs and sometimes marked with
stones and cairn circles.
In recent explorations, 24 new urn burial sites were discovered in the study area. Most
of them were reported from Pathanapuram taluk (11) and are followed by
Kottarakkara (7), Kollam (4) and Punalur (2). The urn burials from the study area were
found in the area of 21 m to 203 m above the mean sea level.
An urn burial from Pavumba Loc-1 (Figure4) is covered with a terracotta lid, and an
urn burial from Kallorkonam Loc-1 (Figure5) is covered with a stone slab. Six urn
burials have a globular base and chain-like applique decorations on the neck portion of
the exterior.
279
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 9: 2021-22
The explorations yielded Megalithic ceramics from three urn burial sites, namely
Vayakkal (VKL), Pavumba Loc-1 (PVMA-1), and Pavumba Loc-2 (PVMA-2). The
Megalithic ceramics from these urn burials include Black Wares and Red Wares in the
shape of bowls, pots, lids, and miniature pots. All the urn burial sites in the study area
are in an extremely destroyed condition due to modernization and infrastructure
development.
Figure 4: Lid Covered Urn from Figure 5: Stone Slab Covered Urn from
Pavumba Loc-1 Kalloorkonam Loc-1
Menhirs
Menhirs are erected single stones and are devoid of any grave goods placed beneath
them. The menhirs are also known as Nattukkal/Pullachikkal. From the study area, 8
menhirs were discovered. Most of the menhirs were reported from Punalur (6) and
Kottarakkara (2). The menhirs from the study area were found in an area of 94 m to 186
m above the mean sea level. All the menhirs are made of granite/charnockite stones.
Typologically the menhirs are found with the pointed top portion (Figure 6) and with
the flat top portions (Figure 7). The menhir at Sathyanpara is comparatively bigger
than the other menhirs. It has 230 cm in height and 102 cm in width.
Stone Circles
This type of burial consists of huge dressed or undressed stones arranged in a circle to
enclose burials. Generally, stone circles are used to demarcate and mark places with
memorials. From the study area, 3 stone circles were reported. In the recent
exploration, two stone circle sites were reported from Kollam taluk. The stone circles
from the study area were found in an area of 10 m above the mean sea level. Both the
stone circles are made of laterite stones. The stone circles at both sites are largely
destroyed, so their circumference measurements are not possible. At each site,
280
Kumar et al. 2021-22: 270-287
presently only single stone of the stone circle can be seen on the surface (Figure 8). The
measurements of the stones are 63 cm to 84 cm in height, 50 to 64 cm in width and 33 to
42 cm in thickness.
Figure 6: Menhir with Pointed Top from Figure 7: Menhir with Flat Top from
Kottathala Sathyanpara
281
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 9: 2021-22
Condition of Preservation
In the Kollam district, most of the sites are in a poor state of preservation. The natives
do not have adequate awareness of the cultural value of the Megaliths, and factors like
urbanization and the development of infrastructure badly affect archaeological
remains. Still, a large number of burial structures have been damaged by the local
people in search of treasure within them. However, some Megalithic sites have been
considered worship places due to local beliefs, which helped to save some of the
Megalithic monuments from human interference.
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Cist Urn Menhir Stone Circle Dolmen
Previous 6 14 13 1 1
New 24 24 8 2 0
35 Megalithic sites were previously reported in the study area. Twenty of these sites
were reported between the late 1980s and early 1990s. The geo-coordinates of these
sites are not given in the available published sources. Among the previously reported
sites, only 16 were revisited with the help of local information, and thus, geo-
coordinates were recorded. Many of these are completely destroyed. Hence only 6 of
282
Kumar et al. 2021-22: 270-287
In the study area, out of the total 30 cists reported, 24 cists were reported in the recent
exploration, and all the recently reported cists are located in hilly regions. Depending
on the location of the cists, hilly areas can be classified into three categories. The cists
are located on hill slopes (18), foothills (4) and hilltops (2). However, the cists located
on the hill slopes face a valley or water body, or agricultural areas such as paddy fields.
The locations of the 11 cists are in proximity to the streams, 12 cists to the valleys and
one cist to the paddy field. These areas are more likely to have habitation deposits of
the Iron Age people. Although the present surveys in these regions did not reveal any
habitation evidence, there is immense scope for future investigations.
The cists found during the study are located in various locations on hill slopes. The
cists are located on the slopes towards the east (8 nos.), west (5 nos.), south (8 nos.) and
north (3 nos.) of the hills.
44 Megalithic sites are located in the eastern hilly region, of which 31 are in
Pathanapuram taluk, and the other 13 are in Punalur taluk (Figures 4, 9-12). Most of
the Megalithic sites are in Pathanapuram and Punalur taluks. The majority of the
reserved forests are also concentrated in these two taluks. Compared to other four
taluks, Pathanapuram and Punalur taluks have least population density. As
Pathanapuram taluk is a hilly region and due to the presence of reserved forest, the
area is less disturbed. This could be a reason for the availability of a large number of
sites from this region. Geomorphologically the areas of Punalur and Pathanapuram
taluks are similar in nature. The enormous availability of granite and charnockite rocks
in these regions favoured the erection of cist burials. In addition to this, the region also
produces evidence of urn burials.
Kottarakkara taluk is in the midland region of the Kollam district. Therefore, the
agricultural and housing construction activities were responsible for exposing most of
the areas. Along with the urn burials, menhirs and cist burials were also identified
from Kottarakkara taluk. Kollam taluk has mostly coastal areas, and very few
Megalithic sites were found as compared to other taluks. It includes urn burials and
menhirs. Previous studies found only one Megalithic site in Kunnathur taluk, but not a
single Megalithic site in Karunagapally taluk. In this recent exploration, Kunnathur
and Karunagapally taluks did not reveal a single Megalithic vestige (Figures 4 and 12).
The reasons for the complete absence of Megalithic remains in this region need to be
investigated.
283
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 9: 2021-22
Figure 10: Distribution Pattern of Previously Reported Megalithic Sites (for which
geocoordinates are available) in Kollam District
Figure 11: Distribution Pattern of Newly Reported Megalithic Sites in Kollam District
284
Kumar et al. 2021-22: 270-287
Figure 12: Distribution Pattern of Previously Reported Megalithic Sites (for which
Geo-coordinates are available) and Newly Reported Megalithic Sites in Kollam District
The distribution pattern revealed through the present study does not show much
difference with regard to the distribution pattern based on the previously reported
sites (Figures 9-12). However, this study imparts a detailed list of Megalithic remains
from the region, which was systematically gathered with the help of a comprehensive
fresh archaeological survey. Importantly, this kind of regional-level database will be
available and useable to future researchers for further advancing the knowledge about
Megalithic populations of the Kollam region and the Indian subcontinent in general.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Department of Archaeology, University of Kerala, for
research support. The first author thankfully acknowledges the e-grants scheme of the
Government of Kerala for funding his PhD research. Thanks are due to the Kerala
Forest and Wildlife Department, and the State Farming Corporation of Kerala for
granting permission to survey the areas concerned. Thanks are due to Ananthu V. Dev
for preparing maps.
References
Abhayan, G.S. 2018. Iron Age Culture in Kerala, South India: An Appraisal, in Iron Age
in South Asia, South Asian Archaeology Series 2 (Akinori Uesugi Ed.), pp. 145-
188, Osaka: Research Group for South Asian Archaeology, Archaeological
Research Institute, Kansai University.
285
ISSN 2347 – 5463 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 9: 2021-22
Abhayan, G.S., S.V. Rajesh, A. Uesugi, P. Nayar, B.S. Mohammed Muhaseen, N.L.
Sulal, K.G. Archana, R. Harinarayanan, A.V. Dev, K. Muhammed Fasalu, P.
Soorya, K.S. Arun Kumar, R. Haseen Raja, S. Kumbodharan, M.S. Sujanpal
and M.S. Sandra 2021. Megalithic Cist Burial Excavation at Enadimangalam
in Kerala and its Implication in Cist Burial Architecture and Burial
Practices, Archaeological Research in Asia 27: 1-15.
Allchin, B.G. and R. Allchin 1982. The Rise of Civilization in India and Pakistan.
Cambridge University Press.
Ambily, C.S. 2021a. An Overview of Iron Age/Megaliths in Pamba River Basin, South
Kerala, in Iron Age in India: Some More Thoughts (G.S. Abhayan, S.V. Rajesh
and P. Nayar Eds.), pp. 35-60. Thiruvananthapuram: Department of
Archaeology, University of Kerala.
Ambily, C.S. 2021b. Megalithic Culture of Kerala: A Study of Pamba River Basin. New
Delhi: Sharada Publishing House.
Arun Kumar, K.S., G.S. Abhayan and S.V. Rajesh 2021. Distribution Pattern of
Megalithic Remains in Kottarakkara and Pathanapuram Taluks in Kollam
District, Kerala, in Iron Age in India: Some More Thoughts (G.S. Abhayan, S.V.
Rajesh and P. Nayar Eds.), pp. 77-101. Thiruvananthapuram: Department
of Archaeology, University of Kerala.
Darsana, S.B. 2010. Megalithic Burials of Iron Age-Early Historic Kerala: An Overview,
Man and Environment 35(1): 98-117.
IAR 1960-61. Ghosh, A. (Ed.) 1964. Indian Archaeology 1961-62: A Review. New Delhi:
Archaeological Survey of India.
IAR 1989-90. Mahapatra, S.K. (Ed.) 1994. Indian Archaeology 1989-90: A Review. New
Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.
IAR 1990-91. Mahapatra, S.K. (Ed.) 1995. Indian Archaeology 1991-92: A Review. New
Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.
IAR 1991-92. Singh, B. P. (Ed.) 1996. Indian Archaeology 1991-92: A Review. New Delhi:
Archaeological Survey of India.
IAR 1992-93. Shankar, A. (Ed.) 1997. Indian Archaeology 1992-93: A Review. New Delhi:
Archaeological Survey of India.
IAR 1993-94. Bisht, R. S., C. Dorje and A. Banerji (Ed.) 2000. Indian Archaeology 1993-94:
A Review. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.
IAR 1996-97. Menon, K. G. (Ed.) 2002. Indian Archaeology 1996-97: A Review. New
Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.
Liju, A. 2006. Distribution Pattern of Megalithic Sites in Kerala. Unpublished MA
Dissertation. Thiruvananthapuram: Department of Archaeology,
University of Kerala.
Paddayya, K. 2006. Recent Studies in Indian Archaeology (Indian Council of Historical
Research Monograph). New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
Peter, Jenee 2002. Dimensions of Megalithic Culture of Kerala in Relation to Peninsular India:
An Interdisciplinary Approach. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Vadodara:
The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda.
286
Kumar et al. 2021-22: 270-287
Rajan, K. 1994. Archaeology of Tamilnadu (Kongu country). Noida: Book India Pub. Co.
Rajendran, P. and A. Kshirsagar 1993. Poredam urn burial - A Chalcolithic
culture, Current Science 64(3): 148-149.
Rajendran, P. and C.S.P. Iyer 1997. A preliminary report on the characterization of
copper and gold ornaments of the Arippa Megalithic culture in Kollam
district, Kerala, South India, Man and Environment XXII (2): 61–65.
Rajendran, P. and G.L. Badam 1995. A note on the Megalithic cultural remains from the
cist burials at Arippa in Kollam District of Kerala, South India, Current
Science 68 (7): 684-686.
Satyamurthy, T. 1992. The Iron Age in Kerala - A Report on Mangadu
Excavation. Thiruvananthapuram: Publication Unit, Department of
Archaeology, Government of Kerala.
The Hindu 2005. Megalithic burial site uncovered. October 10, 2005.
The Hindu 2009. Megalithic age idols unearthed in Kerala (Hemachandran). September 12,
2009.
Vinuraj, B. 2016. Archaeology of Kollam District. Unpublished M.A. Dissertation.
Thiruvananthapuram: Department of Archaeology, University of Kerala.
287